CAS based approach for discussing subset construction

This paper continues the discussion of teaching nondeterminism (see [6]) where we presented a didactic approach introducing the notion of nondeterministic automata. Although in this paper we use the same methodology we have to face up to new didactic challenges. Namely, teaching the subset construction requires answers to the question how can CAS be used in teaching the different phases of mathematical problem solving so that we can reach higher cognitive efficiency.     

Examining the didactic contract when handheld technology is permitted in the mathematics classroom

The use of mathematics analysis software (MAS) including handheld scientific and graphics calculators offers a range of pedagogical opportunities. Its use can support change in the didactic contract. MAS may become an alternative source of authority in the classroom empowering students to explore variation and regularity, manipulate simulations and link representations. Strategic use may support students to direct their own learning and explore mathematics, equipping them to share their findings with the teacher and the class with more confidence. This paper offers a framework for examining the impact of the use of MAS on the didactic contract. Lessons were observed in 12 grade 10 classes, with 12 different teachers new to MAS. MAS technology was used with a variety of didactic contracts, mostly traditional. The framework drew attention to many ways in which the teaching differed. Analysis of the didactic contract must consider both the teaching of mathematics and of technology skills, because these have different characteristics. In all classes, both teachers and students saw the teacher as having a responsibility to teach technology skills. Students saw technology skills as the main point of the lesson, but the teachers saw the lesson as primarily teaching mathematics—one of the mismatches which may need negotiation to adapt didactic contracts to teaching with MAS.     

Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories

In our research work, we have looked at the way in which artefacts become, for teachers as well as for students, instruments of their mathematical activity. The issues related to the use of tools and technologies in mathematical education are now widely considered. A look to history highlights the different ways in which the same questions have been studied at different times and in different places. This suggests that the contribution of artefacts to mathematics learning should be considered in terms of various contexts. Our “visits” to these contexts will be guided by the coordination of two main theoretical frameworks, the instrumental approach and the semiotic mediation approach from the perspective of mathematics laboratory. This journey through history and schooling represents a good occasion to address some questions: Are there “good” contexts in which to develop mathematical instruments? Are there “good” teaching practices which assist students’ instrumental geneses and construct mathematical meanings? How is it possible to promote such teaching practices? Some study cases are discussed.     

Students’ understanding of algebraic notation: A semiotic systems perspective

The ideas of equivalence and variable are two of the most fundamental concepts in algebra. Most studies of students’ understanding of these concepts have posited a gap between the students’ conceptions and the institutional meanings for the symbols. In contrast, this study develops a theoretical framework for describing the ways undergraduate students use personal meanings for symbols as they appropriate institutional meanings. To do this, we introduce the idea of semiotic systems as a framework for understanding the ways students use collections of signs to engage in mathematical activity and how the students use these signs in meaningful ways. The analysis of students’ work during task-based interviews suggests that this framework allows us to identify the ways in which seemingly idiosyncratic uses of the symbols are evidence of meaning-making and, in many cases, how the symbol use enables the student to engage productively in the mathematical activity.     

On the construction of set-based meanings for the truth of mathematical conditionals

This paper presents a case study of Hugo’s construction of Euler diagrams to develop set-based meanings for the truth of mathematical conditionals. We use this case to set forth a framework of three stages of activity in students’ guided reinvention of mathematical logic: reading activity, connecting activity, and fluent activity. The framework also categorizes various forms of connecting activity by which students may reflect on their reading activity: connecting tasks, connecting representations, and connecting conditions for truth and falsehood (which we call meanings). We argue that coordinating such connections is necessary to justify logical equivalences, such as why contrapositive statements share truth-values. Through the case study, we document the representations and meanings that Hugo called upon to assign truth-values to conditionals. The framework should help clarify and advance future research on the teaching and learning of logic rooted in students’ mathematical activity.     

Didactic approach for teaching nondeterminism in automata theory

Nondeterminism plays a central role in almost all fields of computer science. It has been incorporated naturally as well as in the theory of automata as a generalization of determinism. Although nondeterministic finite automata do not have more recognition power than deterministic ones their importance and usefulness is of no doubt.Unfortunately, the operation of the mathematical model of nondeterministic automata is difficult to understand which means a didactic challenge for every teacher and lecturer. This paper gives a didactic approach to introduce the notion of finite (deterministic and) nondeterministic automata.As a teaching tool we make use of the automata theory package developed in Maple. We put emphasis on the process character of learning and work out a method that promotes the repetitive experiments.     

The intangible task – a revelatory case of teaching mathematical thinking in Japanese elementary schools

This paper deals with the nature of teaching mathematical thinking and presents a case study of a single Japanese lesson where the characteristics of mathematical thinking and the teaching thereof are identified in relation to multiplication. The raison d’être for this teaching is questioned and investigated by looking at how multiplication is described in the curriculum and representative textbook material. It is seen how Japanese teachers are institutionally conditioned to incorporate mathematical thinking in the context of multiplication, something which may appear in contrast to other countries. The lesson is analysed using the notion of praxeologies and didactic co-determination conceptualised in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic.     

Graphic calculators and connectivity software to be a community of mathematics practitioners

In a teaching experiment carried out at the secondary school level, we observe the students’ processes in modelling activities, where the use of graphic calculators and connectivity software gives a common working space in the class. The study shows results in continuity with others emerged in the previous ICMEs and some new ones, and offers an analysis of the novelty of the software in introducing new ways to support learning communities in the construction of mathematical meanings. The study is conducted in a semiotic-cultural framework that considers the introduction and the evolution of signs, such as words, gestures and interaction with technologies, to understand how students construct mathematical meanings, working as a community of practice. The novelty of the results consists in the presence of two technologies for students: the “private” graphic calculators and the “public” screen of the connectivity software. Signs for the construction of knowledge are mediated by both of them, but the second does it in a social way, strongly supporting the work of the learning community.     

Mathematical modelling and the learning trajectory: tools to support the teaching of linear algebra

In this article we present a didactic proposal for teaching linear algebra based on two compatible theoretical models: emergent models and mathematical modelling. This proposal begins with a problematic situation related to the creation and use of secure passwords, which leads students toward the construction of the concepts of spanning set and span. The objective is to evaluate this didactic proposal by determining the level of match between the hypothetical learning trajectory (HLT) designed in this study with the actual learning trajectory in the second experimental cycle of an investigation design-based research more extensive. The results show a high level of match between the trajectories in more than half of the conjectures, which gives evidence that the HLT has supported, in many cases, the achievement of the learning objective, and that additionally mathematical modelling contributes to the construction of these linear algebra concepts.     

Qualities of examples in learning and teaching

In this paper, we theorise about the different kinds of relationship between examples and the classes of mathematical objects that they exemplify as they arise in mathematical activity and teaching. We ground our theorising in direct experience of creating a polynomial that fits certain constraints to develop our understanding of engagement with examples. We then relate insights about exemplification arising from this experience to a sequence of lessons. Through these cases, we indicate the variety of fluent uses of examples made by mathematicians and experienced teachers. Following Thompson’s concept of “didactic object” (Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 191–212, 2002), we talk about “didacticising” an example and observe that the nature of students’ engagement is important, as well as the teacher’s intentions and actions (Thompson avoids using a verb with the root “didact”. We use the verb “didacticise” but without implying any connection to particular theoretical approaches which use the same verb.). The qualities of examples depend as much on human agency, such as pedagogical intent or mathematical curiosity or what is noticed, as on their mathematical relation to generalities.     

On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms

Trouche’s [Third Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education Symposiums, Reims, France, June 2003] presentation at the Third Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education Symposium focused on the notions of instrumental genesis and of orchestration: the former concerning the mutual transformation of learner and artefact in the course of constructing knowledge with technology; the latter concerning the problem of integrating technology into classroom practice. At the Symposium, there was considerable discussion of the idea of situated abstraction, which the current authors have been developing over the last decade. In this paper, we summarise the theory of instrumental genesis and attempt to link it with situated abstraction. We then seek to broaden Trouche’s discussion of orchestration to elaborate the role of artefacts in the process, and describe how the notion of situated abstraction could be used to make sense of the evolving mathematical knowledge of a community as well as an individual. We conclude by elaborating the ways in which technological artefacts can provide shared means of mathematical expression, and discuss the need to recognise the diversity of student’s emergent meanings for mathematics, and the legitimacy of mathematical expression that may be initially divergent from institutionalised mathematics.     

Modeling the join curve between two co-axial carbon nanotubes

Making use of an applied mathematical model, we employ a calculus of variations technique to join two co-axial nanotubes. Due to the axial symmetry of the tubes, the three-dimensional problem can be reduced to a problem in two dimensions. The curvature squared for the join region is minimized for a prescribed join length and given tube radii. In this model, a certain non-dimensional parameter B arises, which approximately has the same numerical value when compared with the standard method for the joining between any two carbon nanotubes of different radii. This value occurs in consequence of adopting an angle of inclination of 9.594°, which occurs in the conventional method for joining two carbon nanotubes of different radii and which is necessary to accommodate a single pentagon. The simple calculus of variations model described here provides a general framework to connect nanotubes or other nanostructures.     

Revisiting the didactic triangle: from the particular to the general

The basic notion of a didactic triangle is explained with historical annotations on its origins and subsequent theorization in the literature. Instances of its application to classroom environments to demonstrate its representational capabilities are presented. Generalizations of the triangle are proposed that integrate the role of technology, the researcher in mathematics teaching developmental research, and mediating complexes in the student?Cteacher?Ccontent interfaces. Further, the use of the didactic triangle as a heuristic device is also discussed.     

Metaphor or Met-Before? The effects of previouos experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics

While the general notion of ‘metaphor’ may offer a thoughtful analysis of the nature of mathematical thinking, this paper suggests that it is even more important to take into account the particular mental structures available to the individual that have been built from experience that the individual has ‘met-before.’ The notion of ‘met-before’ offers not only a principle to analyse the changing meanings in mathematics and the difficulties faced by the learner—which we illustrate by the problematic case of the minus sign—it can also be used to analyse the met-befores of mathematicians, mathematics educators and those who develop theories of learning to reveal implicit assumptions that support our thinking in some ways and act as impediments in others.     

Mediated action in teachers’ discussions about mathematics tasks

This paper presents analyses of teachers?? discussions within mathematics teaching developmental research projects, taking mediation as the central construct. The relations in the so-called ??didactic triangle?? form the basic framework for the analysis of two episodes in which upper secondary school teachers discuss and prepare tasks for classroom use. The analysis leads to the suggestion that the focus on tasks places an emphasis on the task as object and its resolution as goal; mathematics has the role of a mediating artefact. Subject content in the didactic triangle is thus displaced by the task and learning mathematics may be relegated to a subordinate position.     

Learning about multiplication by comparing algorithms: “One times one,but actually they are ten times ten”

Multiplication algorithms in primary school are still frequently introduced with little attention to meaning. We present a case study focusing on a third grade class that engaged in comparing two algorithms and discussing “why they both work”. The objectives of the didactical intervention were to foster students' development of mathematical meanings concerning multiplication algorithms, and their development of an attitude to judge and compare the value and efficiency of different algorithms. Underlying hypotheses were that it is possible to promote the simultaneous unfolding of the semiotic potential of two algorithms, considered as cultural artifacts, with respect to the objectives of the didactical intervention, and to establish a fruitful synergy between the two algorithms. As results, this study sheds light onto the new theoretical construct of “bridging sign”, illuminating students’ meaning-making processes involving more than one artifact; and it provides important insight into the actual unfolding of the hypothesized potential of the algorithms.     

Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning

The purpose of this paper is to further the notion of defining as a mathematical activity by elaborating a framework that structures the role of defining in student progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning. The framework is the result of a retrospective account of a significant learning experience that occurred in an undergraduate geometry course. The framework integrates the instructional design theory of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and distinctions between concept image and concept definition and offers other researchers and instructional designers a structured way to analyze or plan for the role of defining in students’ mathematical progress.     

浅议高等数学的教学理念

本文根据目前高等数学教学的现状，提出了更新教师的教学理念，教学过程融入现代数学思想的一些建议．     

Modeling empowered by information and communication technologies

In this article, we describe our work with mathematical modeling (MM) at different educational levels and discuss how the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) empowered such work. Characteristics of two trends in research which have influenced our work are presented: one is a Brazilian perspective of MM, and the other is the use of ICTs in mathematics classrooms seen through the lens of the theoretical construct “humans-with-media”. We introduce some key questions regarding the notion of mathematical model and the phases of the modeling process that were paramount for us. Finally, we describe and analyze two experiences using modeling in different educational contexts, and present some evidence of the empowering role of ICTs in such contexts.