Multiblock copolymers as polymeric surfactants: are “pancakes” better than “dumbbells”?

It is suggested that multiblock copolymers which form a pancake at the interface between two incompatible homopolymers would be more efficient as compatibilizers than di- or triblock copolymers. Less of the multiblock copolymers would be lost into the bulk phases as micelles or mesophases than di- or triblock copolymers if some degree of irregularity is included in the multiblock architecture, either in block length or chemical sequence distribution, without compromising the thermodynamic driving forces which localize the copolymers at the interface. This molecular design strategy is aimed at reducing the ability of the surfactant to form a separate phase, thereby increasing the interfacial activity in a nonequilibrium system with a large interfacial area. The multiblock loops which would preferentially orient into the most compatible homopolymer phases would have to exceed a certain critical size in order to avoid the entropic penalty of having an extremely flat pancake, and to provide good adhesion between the bulk phases.     

How good is CuAAC “click” chemistry for polymer coupling reactions?

¹H NMR and SEC analyses are used to investigate the overall efficiency of Copper Catalyzed Azide Alkyne Cycloaddition (CuAAC) “click” coupling reactions between alkyne‐ and azide‐terminated polymers using polystyrene as a model. Quantitative convolution modeling of the entire molecular weight distribution is applied to characterize the outcomes of the functional polymer synthesis reactions (i.e., by atom transfer radical polymerization), as well as the CuAAC coupling reaction. Incomplete functionality of the azide‐terminated polystyrene (∼92%) proves to be the largest factor compromising the efficacy of the CuAAC coupling reaction and is attributed primarily to the loss of terminal bromide functionality during its synthesis. The efficiency of the S_N2 reaction converting bromide to azide was found to be about 99%. After taking into account the influence of non‐functional polymer, we find that, under the reaction conditions used, the efficiency of the CuAAC coupling reaction determined from both techniques is about 94%. These inefficiencies compromise the fidelity and potential utility of CuAAC coupling reactions for the synthesis of hierarchically structured polymers. While CuAAC efficiency is expected to depend on the specific reaction conditions used, the framework described for determining reaction efficiency does provide a means for ultimately optimizing the reaction conditions for CuAAC coupling reactions. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2018 , 56, 75–84     

Is There a “Most Chiral Tetrahedron”?

A degree of chirality is a function that purports to measure the amount of chirality of an object: it is equal for enantiomers, vanishes only for achiral or degenerate objects and is similarity invariant, dimensionless and normalisable to the interval [0,1]. For a tetrahedron of non-zero three-dimensional volume, achirality is synonymous with the presence of a mirror plane containing one edge and bisecting its opposite, and hence it is easy to design degree-of-chirality functions based on edge length that incorporate all constraints. It is shown that such functions can have largest maxima at widely different points in the tetrahedral shape space, and by incorporation of appropriate factors, the maxima can be pushed to any point in the space. Thus the phrase "most chiral tetrahedron" has no general meaning: any chiral tetrahedron is the most chiral for some legitimate choice of degree of chirality.