The Reactivity of Potassium Polyfluoroaryl‐, Polyfluoroalkenyl‐, and Perfluoroalkyltrifluoroborates and their Hydrocarbon Analogues towards Acids of Different Strength: A Systematic Study of the Hydrodeboration

The hydrodeboration of the (fluoroorgano)trifluoroborates K [R_FBF₃] [R_F = C₆F₅, XCF=CF (X = F, cis‐ and trans‐Cl, C₃F₇O, cis‐C₂F₅, trans‐C₄F₉, ‐C₄H₉) and C₆F₁₃] and of the organotrifluoroborates K [RBF₃] (R = C₆H₅, cis‐ and trans‐C₄H₉CH=CH, C₄H₉ and C₈H₁₇) with CH₃CO₂H (100 %), CF₃CO₂H (100 %), aqueous HF and anhydrous HF was investigated. In the alkenyltrifluoroborates K [R'CF=CFBF₃] the formal replacement of BF₃ by a proton occurred stereospecifically under retention of the configuration. The ¹⁹F NMR spectra of K [R_FBF₃] in acids indicate strong interactions of the BF₃ group with protons or acid molecules.     

(Fluoroorgano)fluoroboranes and ‐borates. 7 [1] The Reaction of RFBF2 and K [RFBF3] (RF = perfluorophenyl‐, perfluoroalk‐1‐enyl‐ and perfluoroalkyl) with Xenon Difluoride in Anhydrous HF

The dissolution of (perfluoroorgano)difluoroboranes R_FBF₂ in anhydrous HF (aHF) resulted in equilibrium mixtures of the starting borane and different kinds of acid‐base products: [H₂F] [R_FBF₂(F · HF)] (R_F = C₆F₅, cis‐C₂F₅CF=CF, trans‐C₄F₉CF=CF) or [H₂F] [R_FBF₃] (R_F = C₆F₁₃). In aHF the aryl compounds C₆F₅BF₂ and K [C₆F₅BF₃] showed two parallel reactivities with XeF₂: xenodeborylation (formation of the [C₆F₅Xe]⁺ cation) and fluorine addition to the aryl group. In aHF perfluoroalk‐1‐enyldifluoroboranes R_FBF₂ as well as potassium perfluoroalk‐1‐enyltrifluoroborates K [R_FBF₃] (R_F = cis‐C₂F₅CF=CF, trans‐C₄F₉CF=CF) underwent only fluorine addition across the carbon‐carbon double bond under the action of XeF₂. Potassium perfluorohexyltrifluoroborate K [C₆F₁₃BF₃] did not react with XeF₂ in aHF.     

Tris(dimethylamido)bis(dimethylamine)titanium(IV) chloridobis(dimethylamine)[tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron–amido][tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron–nitrido]titanate(IV) toluene solvate

The title ionic solid, [Ti(C₂H₆N)₃(C₂H₇N)₂][Ti(C₁₈BF₁₅N)(C₁₈H₂BF₁₅N)Cl(C₂H₇N)₂]·C₇H₈, (I), comprises a cation with three dimethylamide ligands in the equatorial plane and two dimethylamine ligands positioned axially in a trigonal–bipyramidal geometry about the central Ti^IV atom. The anion has a highly distorted octahedral structure. The two dimethylamine ligands are coordinated mutually trans. The chloride is trans to the tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron–amide, while the sixth coordination site is occupied by an ortho‐F atom of the tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron–amide group in a trans disposition with respect to the tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron–nitride ligand. The most significant feature of the anion is the presence of an unprecedented terminal Ti[triple‐bond]N moiety [1.665 (2) Å], stabilized by coordination to B(C₆F₅)₃, with a Ti[triple‐bond]N—B angle of 169.50 (19)°.     

[(C6F5)2IF2][BF4], the First Salt with the Electrophilic Cation [(C6F5)2IF2]+: Synthesis,Reactivity, and Structure

The substitution of hypervalently bonded fluorine atoms in C₆F₅IF₄ was performed with C₆F₅BF₂ and resulted in the new salt [(C₆F₅)₂IF₂][BF₄]. The iodonium(V) salt was characterized by multi‐NMR and Raman spectroscopy and X‐ray crystal structure analysis. The fluorinating ability of the new electrophilic cation [(C₆F₅)₂IF₂]⁺ was exemplified in reactions with monovalent iodine compounds (C₆F₅I, p‐FC₆H₄I, and I₂) and with electron‐poor tri(organyl)pnictanes ER₃ (E = P, As, Sb, Bi; R = C₆F₅). In a heterogeneous reaction with CsF in MeCN the [(C₆F₅)₂IF₂]⁺ cation forms the dinuclear [{(C₆F₅)₂IF₂}₂F]⁺ cation.     

Gas‐phase fluorine migration reactions in the radical cations of pentafluorosulfanylbenzene (Aryl―SF5) and benzenesulfonyl fluoride (Aryl―SO2F) derivatives and in the 2,5‐xylylfluoroiodonium ion

The gas‐phase reactions of Aryl―SF₅^·+ and Aryl―SO₂F^·+ have been studied with the electron ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Such reactions involve F‐atom migration from the S‐atom to the aryl group affording the product ion Aryl―F^·+ by subsequent expulsion of SF₄ or SO₂, respectively. Especially, the 4‐pentafluorosulfanylphenyl cation 4‐SF₅C₆H₄⁺ (m/z 203) from 4‐NO₂C₆H₄SF₅^·+ by loss of ·NO₂ could occur multiple F‐atom migration reactions to the product ion C₆H₄F₃⁺ (m/z 133) by loss of SF₂ in the MS/MS process. The gas‐phase reactions of 2,5‐xylylfluoroiodonium (pXyl―I⁺F, m/z 251) have also been studied using the electrospray tandem mass spectrometry, which involve a similar F‐atom migration process from the I‐atom to the aryl group giving the radical cation of 2‐fluoro‐p‐xylene (or its isomer 4‐fluoro‐m‐xylene, m/z 124) by reductive elimination of an iodine atom. All these gas‐phase F‐atom migration reactions from the heteroatom to the aryl group led to the aryl―F coupling product ions with a new formed C_Aryl―F bond. Density functional theory calculations were performed to shed light on the mechanisms of these reactions. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Mono‐ and Perfluoroaryliodine(III) Cyano Compounds – Synthesis,Reactivity, and Structure

C₆F₅I(CN)₂ and x‐FC₆H₄I(CN)₂ (x = 2, 3, 4) were isolated from reactions of the corresponding aryliodine difluorides ArIF₂ and a stoichiometric excess of Me₃SiCN in CCl₃F (0 °C) or CH₂Cl₂ (20 °C), respectively. In addition, x‐FC₆H₄I(CN)₂ compounds were synthesized in good yields on alternative routes, namely from 3‐ or 4‐FC₆H₄I(OC(O)CH₃)₂ or 4‐FC₆H₄I(OC(O)CF₃)₂ or from 4‐FC₆H₄IO and Me₃SiCN in CH₂Cl₂ at 20 °C. In the 1 : 1 reaction of C₆F₅IF₂ and Me₃SiCN a lower temperature was necessary to suppress partial disubstitution and to obtain the first example of a new type of aryliodine(III) cyanide compounds, C₆F₅I(CN)F. 4‐FC₆H₄I(CN)F could be isolated from the equimolar reaction of 4‐FC₆H₄IF₂ and Me₃SiCN in CH₂Cl₂ even at 20 °C. The new products were characterized by multi‐NMR and Raman spectroscopy. The molecular structures of C₆F₅I(CN)₂, 3‐ and 4‐FC₆H₄I(CN)₂, C₆F₅I(CN)F, and 4‐FC₆H₄I(CN)F are discussed and compared with that of C₆F₅IF₂. The reactivity of C₆F₅I(CN)F towards fluoride acceptors EF_n (BF₃, AsF₅) and R_xEX_?x (C₆F₅SiF₃, C₆H₅SiF₃, C₆H₅PF₄, Me₃SiCl, Me₃SiC₆F₅) were investigated and showed differing reaction patterns (fluoride abstraction, aryl transfer, chloride transfer). Besides the molecular entities C₆F₅I(CN)F and C₆F₅I(CN)Cl, the corresponding iodonium salts [C₆F₅(CN)I][BF₄] and [C₆F₅(CN)I][AsF₆] were isolated. The thermal stability of ArI(CN)₂ and ArI(CN)F, neat and in solution, as well as the reactivity of 4‐FC₆H₄I(CN)₂ towards the Lewis acid BF₃ are reported.     

Fully and partially fluorinated flavone derivatives

In the crystal structures of the fully and partially fluorinated flavone derivatives 5,6,7,8‐tetrafluoro‐2‐(2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorophenyl)‐4H‐1‐benzopyran‐4‐one, C₁₅HF₉O₂, (I), and 5,6,7,8‐tetrafluoro‐2‐phenyl‐4H‐1‐benzopyran‐4‐one, C₁₅H₆F₄O₂, (II), the pentafluorophenyl group and the pyranone moiety in (I) are twisted due to repulsion of the F substituents, and a CO(δ⁻)...π(δ⁺) intermolecular interaction is observed between the carbonyl O atom and the pentafluorophenyl group. In (II), on the other hand, the phenyl group and the pyranone moiety are almost coplanar, and arene–perfluoroarene interactions are observed in the head‐to‐tail intermolecular columnar stacking between the phenyl group and the tetrafluorophenylene moiety.     

Synthesis and characterization of novel neutral nickel complexes bearing fluorinated salicylaldiminato ligands and their catalytic behavior for vinylic polymerization of norbornene

A series of salicylaldimine‐based neutral Ni(II) complexes (3a–j) [ArN = CH(C₆H₄O)]Ni(PPh₃)Ph [3a, Ar = C₆H₅; 3b, Ar = C₆H₄F(o); 3c, Ar = C₆H₄F(m); 3d, Ar = C₆H₄F(p); 3e, Ar = C₆H₃F₂(2,4); 3f, Ar = C₆H₃F₂(2,5); 3g, Ar = C₆H₃F₂(2,6); 3h, Ar = C₆H₃F₂(3,5); 3i, Ar = C₆H₂F₃(3,4,5); 3j, Ar = C₆F₅] have been synthesized in good yield, and the structures of complexes 3a and 3i have been confirmed by X‐ray crystallographic analysis. Using modified methylaluminoxane as a cocatalyst, these neutral Ni(II) complexes exhibited high catalytic activities for the vinylic polymerization of norbornene. It was observed that the strong electron‐withdrawing effect of the fluorinated salicylaldiminato ligand was able to significantly increase the catalyst activity for vinylic polymerization of norbornenes. In addition, catalyst activity, polymer yield and polymer molecular weight can also be controlled over a wide range by the variation of reaction parameters such as Al:Ni ratio, norbornene:catalyst ratio, monomer concentration, polymerization temperature and time. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis,characterization, antifungal,antibacterial, and antitumor activities of some tris(pentafluorophenyl)arsenic(V) derivatives

A series of tris(pentafluorophenyl) arsenic(V) derivatives of the type (C₆F₅)₃AsL₂, (C₆F₅)₃As(Cl)(L) [L =  OCOC₆H₄(o‐OH),  OCOC‐(OH)(C₆H₅)₂, and 2‐(6‐OCH₃C₁₀H₆)CH(CH₃) COO ], and cycloarsenates, (R = C₆H₅, p‐CF₃C₆H₄, and p‐OCH₃C₆H₄) have been isolated and characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopic data (infrared; ¹H, ¹⁹F, and ¹³C NMR). These compounds were screened for their in vitro antifungal, antibacterial, and antitumor activities and were found to show moderate to significant activity. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 21:181–187, 2010; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/hc.20593     

Anion‐Dependent Tendency of Di‐Long‐Chain Quaternary Ammonium Salts to Form Ion Quadruples and Higher Aggregates in Benzene

The self‐aggregation tendency of [N(CH₃)₂(C₁₈H₃₇)₂]X [ 1 X; X^?=BF₄^?, PF₆^?, OTf^?, NTf₂^?, BPh₄^?, BTol₄^?, BAr^F?, and B(C₆F₅)₄^?] salts to form ion quadruples (IQs) and higher aggregates (HAggs) in [D₆]benzene is investigated by means of diffusion NMR spectroscopy. The experimental results indicate that salts containing small anions ( 1 BF₄, 1 PF₆, and 1 OTf) are present in solution as IQs even at the lowest investigated concentration of C=5×10^?5 M and show a limited tendency to further self‐aggregate, reaching a maximum average aggregation number (N=V_H/${V_{\rm{H}}^{{\rm{0IP}}} }$ , where V_H=measured hydrodynamic volume and ${V_{\rm{H}}^{{\rm{0IP}}} }$ =hydrodynamic volume of the ion pair) of about 6–8 (C=0.050–0.100 M ). Salts with larger counterions [ 1 BPh₄, 1 BTol₄, 1 BAr^F, and 1 B(C₆F₅)₄] form instead ion pairs at low concentration but steadily self‐aggregate (especially the non‐fluorinated ones) on increasing their concentration up to N values exceeding 50 (C=0.030–0.050 M ). 1 NTf₂ behaves in an intermediate fashion. The self‐aggregation tendency of salts is quantified by formulating the dependence of V_H on C by means of the equations of indefinitive aggregation models. The following rankings for the formation of IQs and HAggs are obtained: IQs: 1 BF₄≈ 1 PF₆≈ 1 OTf> 1 NTf₂> 1 B(C₆F₅)₄≥ 1 BPh₄≥ 1 BTol₄≥ 1 BAr^F; HAggs: 1 BTol₄> 1 BPh₄> 1 NTf₂> 1 B(C₆F₅)₄> 1 BAr^F> 1 BF₄≈ 1 PF₆≈ 1 OTf. Interionic NOE NMR studies and DFT calculations were conducted in order to determine the relative anion–cation orientation in the self‐aggregating units.     

Multiple Pentafluorophenylation of 2,2,3,3,5,6,6‐Heptafluoro‐3,6‐dihydro‐2H‐1,4‐oxazine with an Organosilicon Reagent: NMR and DFT Structural Analysis of Oligo(perfluoroaryl) Compounds

The reagent Me₃Si(C₆F₅) was used for the preparation of a series of perfluorinated, pentafluorophenyl‐substituted 3,6‐dihydro‐2H‐1,4‐oxazines ( 2 – 8 ), which, otherwise, would be very difficult to synthesize. Multiple pentafluorophenylation occurred not only on the heterocyclic ring of the starting compound 1 (Scheme), but also in para position of the introduced C₆F₅ substituent(s) leading to compounds with one to three nonafluorobiphenyl (C₁₂F₉) substituents. While the tris(pentafluorophenyl)‐substituted compound 3 could be isolated as the sole product by stoichiometric control of the reagent, the higher‐substituted compounds 5 – 8 could only be obtained as mixtures. The structures of the oligo(perfluoroaryl) compounds were confirmed by ¹⁹F‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, MS, and/or X‐ray crystallography. DFT simulations of the ¹⁹F‐ and ¹³C‐NMR chemical shifts were performed at the B3LYP‐GIAO/6‐31++G(d,p) level for geometries optimized by the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level, a technique that proved to be very useful to accomplish full NMR assignment of these complex products.     

A Widely Applicable Synthetic Approach to Alk‐1‐yn‐1‐yl(polyfluoroorganyl)‐iodonium Salts [(RC≡C)(R′)I][BF4]

The reaction of alkynyldifluoroboranes RC≡CBF₂ (R = (CH₃)₃C, CF₃, (CF₃)₂CF) with organyliodine difluoride R′IF₂ bearing electron‐withdrawing polyfluoroorganyl groups R′ = C₆F₅, (CF₃)₂CFCF=CF, C₄F₉, and CF₃CH₂ leads to the corresponding alkynyl(organyl)iodonium salts [(RC≡C)(R′)I][BF₄]. This approach uses a widely applicable method as demonstrated for a representative series of polyfluorinated aryl‐, alkenyl‐, and alkyliodine difluorides. Generally, these syntheses proceed with good yields and deliver pure iodonium salts. The distinct electrophilic nature of their [(RC≡C)(R′)I]⁺ cations is deduced from multinuclear magnetic resonance data. Within the series of new iodonium salts [CF₃C≡C(C₄F₉)I][BF₄] is an intrinsic unstable one and decomposed forming CF₃C≡CI and C₄F₁₀.     

Tunable Fluorophores Based on 2‐(N‐Arylimino)pyrrolyl Chelates of Diphenylboron: Synthesis,Structure, Photophysical Characterization,and Application in OLEDs

Reactions of 2‐(N‐arylimino)pyrroles (HNC₄H₃C(H)?N‐Ar) with triphenylboron (BPh₃) in boiling toluene afford the respective highly emissive N,N′‐boron chelate complexes, [BPh₂{κ²N,N′‐NC₄H₃C(H)?N‐Ar}] (Ar=C₆H₅ ( 12 ), 2,6‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 2,6‐iPr₂‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), 4‐OMe‐C₆H₄ ( 15 ), 3,4‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 16 ), 4‐F‐C₆H₄ ( 17 ), 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄ ( 18 ), 4‐CN‐C₆H₄ ( 19 ), 3,4,5‐F₃‐C₆H₂ ( 20 ), and C₆F₅ ( 21 )) in moderate to high yields. The photophysical properties of these new boron complexes largely depend on the substituents present on the aryl rings of their N‐arylimino moieties. The complexes bearing electron‐withdrawing aniline substituents 17 – 20 show more intense (e.g., ?_f=0.71 for Ar=4‐CN‐C₆H₄ ( 19 ) in THF), higher‐energy (blue) fluorescent emission compared to those bearing electron‐donating substituents, for which the emission is redshifted at the expense of lower quantum yields (?_f=0.13 and 0.14 for Ar=4‐OMe‐C₆H₄ ( 15 ) and 3,4‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 16 ), respectively, in THF). The presence of substituents bulkier than a hydrogen atom at the 2,6‐positions of the aryl groups strongly restricts rotation of this moiety towards coplanarity with the iminopyrrolyl ligand framework, inducing a shift in the emission to the violet region (λ_max=410–465 nm) and a significant decrease in quantum yield (?_f=0.005, 0.023, and 0.20 for Ar=2,6‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 2,6‐iPr₂‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), and C₆F₅ ( 21 ), respectively, in THF), even when electron‐withdrawing groups are also present. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TD‐DFT) calculations have indicated that the excited singlet state has a planar aryliminopyrrolyl ligand, except when prevented by steric hindrance (ortho substituents). Calculated absorption maxima reproduce the experimental values, but the error is higher for the emission wavelengths. Organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs) have been fabricated with the new boron complexes, with luminances of the order of 3000 cd m^?2 being achieved for a green‐emitting device.     

Positional and compositional disorder in a ruthenium(II) piano‐stool complex

In (η⁶‐p‐cymene)(difluorophosphinato‐κO){2‐[(1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl‐κN²]pyridine‐κN}ruthenium(II) 0.85‐hexafluorophosphate 0.15‐tetrafluoroborate, [Ru(PO₂F₂)(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₉H₉N₃)](PF₆)_0.85(BF₄)_0.15, (I), the [PO₂F₂]⁻ ligand exhibits positional disorder due to one F atom and one O atom sharing the same two positions related by a mirror reflection across the O—P—F plane. The correct composition of this coordinated anion was successfully determined to be [PO₂F₂]⁻ by refining the complex with various tetrahedral anions in which terminal atoms have similar atomic form factors. The noncoordinated counter‐ion is compositionally disordered between [PF₆]⁻ and [BF₄]⁻. The difficulty in determining the correct composition of this anion illustrates the importance of a crystallographer remaining impartial and open to encountering unexpected moieties in the process of elucidating a structure.     

A first methodical approach to salts with unsymmetrical fluorophenyl(pentafluorophenyl)difluoroiodonium(V) cations [Rf(RF)IF2] (Rf=x-FC6H4, x=2, 3, 4; RF=C6F5)

A promising approach to the unknown type of [Ar′(Ar)IF₂]X salts is offered. x-FC₆H₄IF₄ (x=2, 3, 4) reacts with C₆F₅BF₂ in CH₂Cl₂ and forms [x-FC₆H₄(C₆F₅)IF₂][BF₄] salts in good yields. For [4-FC₆H₄(C₆F₅)IF₂][BF₄] the fluoro-oxidizer property is shown in reactions with weakly reducing agents like E(C₆F₅)₃ (E=P, As, Sb, Bi) and ArI (Ar=4-FC₆H₄, C₆F₅). The fluorine/aryl substitution method is also applied to the synthesis of [(4-FC₆H₄)₂IF₂][BF₄], an example with two identical aryl groups in the difluoroiodonium(V) moiety.     

Primary Studies on Variation in Position of Trifluoromethyl Groups in Several Aromatic Group‐14 Derivatives by 19F‐NMR Spectroscopy

Variation in the position of CF₃ groups in several aromatic Group‐14 compounds was studied by ¹⁹F‐NMR spectroscopy. In these compounds R_nECl_4?n (n=1 or 2; E=Si, Ge, or Sn; R=2,4,6‐(CF₃)₃C₆H₂ (=Ar), 2,6‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃ (=Ar′), or 2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃ (=Ar″)), Ar, Ar′, and Ar″ are all bulky, strongly electron‐withdrawing ligands. The ¹⁹F‐NMR studies of the variation in position of the CF₃ substituents in these compounds as revealed by chemical shifts could be correlated with the electronegativities of the central elements E, and with intramolecular E–F interactions derived from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data. These interactions are considered to play an important role in the stabilization of these compounds.     

Synthesis,Characterization, Luminescence,and Electrochemistry of the Tetranuclear Gold(I) Amidinate Clusters,Precursors to CO Oxidation Catalysts: Au4[(ArNC(H)NAr)]4, Au4[(PhNC(Ph)NPh)]4 and Au4[PhNC(CH3)NPh)4]

A summary of the chemistry of the tetranuclear Au(I) amidinate complexes is presented. Tetranuclear Au(I) amidinate clusters are produced by the reaction of the sodium salt of a amidine ligand with the gold precursor Au(THT)Cl in a (1:1) stoichiometry. The structures of the tetranuclear Au₄[ArNC(H)NAr]₄, Ar = C₆H₄‐4‐OMe, C₆H₃‐3,5‐Cl, C₆H₄‐4‐Me, C₆H₄‐3‐CF₃, C₆F₅, C₁₀H₇ and the tetranuclear Au₄[(PhNC(Ph)NPh]₄ and Au₄[PhNC(CH₃)NPh]₄ have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The average Au···Au distance between adjacent Au(I) atoms is ?3.0 Å, typical of compounds having an aurophilic interaction. The four gold atoms are located at the corner of a rhomboid with the amidinate ligands bridged above and below the near plane of the four Au(I) atoms. The angles at Au···Au···Au in the cyclic units are between 70° and 116°. The tetranuclear gold(I) amidinate clusters each show different luminescence behavior. The tetranuclear clusters Au₄[(ArNC(H)NAr]₄, Ar = C₆H₄‐4‐OMe, Ar = C₆H₄‐3‐CF₃, Ar = C₆H₄‐4‐Me and Ar = C₆H₄‐3,5‐Cl are the first tetranuclear gold(I) cluster species from group 11 elements that show fluorescence at room temperature. The tetranuclear naphthyl derivative Ar = C₁₀H₇ is luminescent only at 77 K. The pentafluorophenyl derivative Ar = C₆F₅ does not show any photoluminescence in the solid state nor in the solution. The lifetimes of the naphthyl and trifluoromethylphenyl complexes are in the millisecond range indicating phosphorescent processes. Electrochemical and chemical oxidation studies of the tetranuclear Au(I) amidinate clusters are presented. The tetranuclear complexes Au₄[ArNC(H)NAr]₄, Ar = C₆H₄‐4‐OMe, Ar = C₆H₄‐4‐Me, and Ar = C₆H₃‐3,5‐Cl, show three reversible waves at 0.75, 0.95, 1.09 V vs. Ag/AgCl at a scan rate of 500 mV/s in 0.1 M Bu₄NPF₆/CH₂Cl₂ at a Pt working electrode in CH₂Cl₂. Three reversible waves at 0.87, 1.19, 1.42 V vs. Ag/AgCl at a scan rate of 100 mV/s are also observed for the tetranuclear complex Au₄[PhNC(Ph)NPh]₄ in CH₂Cl₂. The pentafluorophenyl amidinate derivative, Au₄[ArNC(H)NAr]₄, Ar = C₆F₅ shows no oxidation wave below 1.8 V. Recently it has been shown that Au₄[ArNC(H)NAr]₄ is a very effective catalyst precursor for room temperature CO oxidation.     

Elusive Antimony‐Centered Radical Cations: Isolation,Characterization, Crystal Structures,and Reactivity Studies

One‐electron oxidation of the stibines Aryl₃Sb ( 1 , Aryl=2,6‐ⁱ Pr₂‐4‐OMe‐C₆H₂; 2 , Aryl=2,4,6‐ⁱ Pr₃‐C₆H₂) with AgSbF₆ and NaBAryl^F₄ (Aryl^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) afforded the first structurally characterized examples of antimony‐centered radical cations 1 ^.+[BAryl^F₄]⁻ and 2 ^.+[BAryl^F₄]⁻. Their molecular and electronic structures were investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy, in conjunction with theoretical calculations. Moreover, their reactivity was investigated. The reaction of 2 ^.+[BAryl^F₄]⁻ and p ‐benzoquinone afforded a dinuclear antimony dication salt 3 ²⁺[BAryl^F₄]₂⁻, which was characterized by NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction analysis. The formation of the dication 3 ²⁺ further confirms that the isolated stibine radical cations are antimony‐centered.     

Elusive Antimony‐Centered Radical Cations: Isolation,Characterization, Crystal Structures,and Reactivity Studies

One‐electron oxidation of the stibines Aryl₃Sb ( 1 , Aryl=2,6‐ⁱ Pr₂‐4‐OMe‐C₆H₂; 2 , Aryl=2,4,6‐ⁱ Pr₃‐C₆H₂) with AgSbF₆ and NaBAryl^F₄ (Aryl^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) afforded the first structurally characterized examples of antimony‐centered radical cations 1 ^.+[BAryl^F₄]⁻ and 2 ^.+[BAryl^F₄]⁻. Their molecular and electronic structures were investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy, in conjunction with theoretical calculations. Moreover, their reactivity was investigated. The reaction of 2 ^.+[BAryl^F₄]⁻ and p ‐benzoquinone afforded a dinuclear antimony dication salt 3 ²⁺[BAryl^F₄]₂⁻, which was characterized by NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction analysis. The formation of the dication 3 ²⁺ further confirms that the isolated stibine radical cations are antimony‐centered.     

New types of asymmetrical bromonium salts [RF(RF′)Br]Y where RF and/or RF′ represent perfluorinated aryl, alkenyl, and alkynyl groups

A series of previously unknown asymmetrical fluorinated bis(aryl)bromonium, alkenyl(aryl)bromonium, and alkynyl(aryl)bromonium salts was prepared by reactions of C₆F₅BrF₂ or 4-CF₃C₆H₄BrF₂ with aryl group transfer reagents Ar′SiF₃ (Ar′ = C₆F₅, 4-FC₆H₄, C₆H₅) or perfluoroorganyl group transfer reagents R_F′BF₂ (R_F = C₆F₅, trans-CF₃CFCF, C₃F₇C≡C) preferentially in weakly coordinating solvents (CCl₃F, CCl₂FCClF₂, CH₂Cl₂, CF₃CH₂CHF₂ (PFP), CF₃CH₂CF₂CH₃ (PFB)). The presence of the base MeCN and the influence of the adducts R_F′BF₂·NCMe (R_F = C₆F₅, CF₃C≡C) on reactions aside to bromonium salt formation are discussed. Reactions of C₆F₅BrF₂ with Alk_F′BF₂ in PFP gave mainly C₆F₅Br and Alk_F′F (Alk_F′ = C₆F₁₃, C₆F₁₃CH₂CH₂), presumably, deriving from the unstable salts [C₆F₅(Alk_F′)Br]Y (Y = [Alk_F′BF₃]⁻). Prototypical reactivities of selected bromonium salts were investigated with the nucleophile I^-and the electrophile H⁺. [4-CF₃C₆H₄(C₆F₅)Br][BF₄] showed the conversion into 4-CF₃C₆H₄Br and C₆F₅I when reacted with [Bu₄N]I in MeCN. Perfluoroalkynylbromonium salts [C_nF_2n+1C≡C(R_F)Br][BF₄] slowly added HF when dissolved in aHF and formed [Z-C_nF_2n+1CFCH(R_F)Br][BF₄].