Oligonucleotides Containing 7‐Deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine: Synthesis,Base Protection,and Base‐Pair Stability

Oligonucleotides incorporating 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 3 ) and 2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 1 ) were prepared by solid‐phase synthesis using the phosphoramidites 6 – 9 and 16 which were protected with allyl, diphenylcarbamoyl, or 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl groups. Among the various groups, only the 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl group was applicable to 7‐deazaxanthine protection being removed with 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU) by β‐elimination, while the deprotection of the allyl residue with Pd⁰ catalyst or the diphenylcarbamoyl group with ammonia failed. Contrarily, the allyl group was found to be an excellent protecting group for 2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 1 ). The base pairing of nucleoside 3 with the four canonical DNA constituents as well as with 3‐bromo‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine‐4,6‐diamine ( 4 ) within the 12‐mer duplexes was studied, showing that 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 3 ) has the same universal base‐pairing properties as 2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 1 ). Contrary to the latter, it is extremely stable at the N‐glycosylic bond, while compound 1 is easily hydrolyzed under slightly acidic conditions. Due to the pK_a values 5.7 ( 1 ) and 6.7 ( 3 ), both compounds form monoanions under neutral conditions (95% for 1 ; 65% for 3 ). Although both compounds form monoanions at pH 7.0, pH‐dependent T_m measurements showed that the base‐pair stability of 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosine ( 3 ) with dT is pH‐independent. This indicates that the 2‐oxo group is not involved in base‐pair formation.     

Nucleotides,Part LXVII,The 2‐Cyanoethyl and (2‐Cyanoethoxy)carbonyl Group for Base Protection in Nucleoside and Nucleotide Chemistry

The amino functions of the common 2′‐deoxyribo‐ and ribonucleosides were blocked by the (2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl group on treatment with 2‐cyanoethyl carbonochloridate ( 5 ) or 1‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐3‐methyl‐1H‐imidazolium chloride ( 6 ) leading to 7 , 18 , 8 , 19 , 9 , and 20 . In 2′‐deoxyguanosine, the amide group was additionally blocked at the O⁶ position by the 2‐cyanoethyl (→ 27 ) and 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl group (→ 31 , 32 ). Comparative kinetic studies regarding the cleavage of the ce/ceoc and npe/npeoc group by β‐elimination revealed valuable information about the ease and sequential deprotection of the various blocking groups at different sites of the nucleobases. Besides the 5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)‐protected 3′‐(2‐cyanoethyl diisopropylphosphoramidites) 38 and 39 of N⁴‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐2′‐deoxycytidine and N⁶‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐2′‐deoxyadenosine, respectively, the N²‐[(2‐cyanoethoxy)carbonyl]‐2′‐deoxy‐O⁶‐[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl]guanosine analog 40 is recommended as building block for oligo‐2′‐deoxyribonucleotide synthesis.     

Nucleotides,Part LXVIII,Acetals as New 2′‐O‐Protecting Functions for the Synthesis of Oligoribonucleotides: Synthesis of Monomeric Building Units and Oligoribonucleotides

For the efficient synthesis of oligoribonucleotides by the 5′‐O‐(4,4′‐dimethoxytrityl) phosphoramidite approach, the 2′‐O‐[1‐(benzyloxy)ethyl]acetals 56 – 67 were investigated. Studies with the 2′‐O‐[1‐(benzyloxy)ethyl]‐5′‐O‐(dimethoxytrityl)ribonucleoside 3′‐phosphoramidites 56 – 59 gave, however, only reasonable results. The oligoribonucleotides obtained showed some impurities since the acid stabilities of the acetal and dimethoxytrityl functions are too close to guarantee a high selectivity. A combination of new acid‐labile protected 2′‐O‐protecting groups with the 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl/[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl (npe/npeoc) strategy for base protection was more successful. The synthesis and physical properties of the monomeric building units and their intermediates 8 – 67 and the conditions for the automated generation of homo‐ and mixed oligoribonucleotides is described. The new 2′‐acetal protecting group could be cleaved off in a two step procedure and was designed for levelling their stability with regard to the attached nucleobase as well. Therefore, we used the 1‐{{3‐fluoro‐4‐{{[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl}oxy}benzyl}oxy}ethyl (fnebe) moiety for the protection of 2′‐OH of uridine, and for that of 2′‐OH of A, C, and G, the 1‐{{4‐{{[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl}oxy}benzyl}oxy}ethyl (nebe) residue. After selective deprotection by β‐elimination induced by a strong organic base like DBU, the remaining activated acetal was hydrolyzed under very mild acidic protic conditions, which reduced 2′‐3′ isomerization and chain cleavage. Also storage, handling, and purification of the chemically and enzymatically sensitive oligomers was simplified by this approach.     

Ein neuer Zugang zu 2′‐O‐(2‐Methoxyethyl)ribonucleosiden ausgehend von D‐Glucose

A New Access to 2′‐ O ‐(2‐Methoxyethyl)ribonucleosides Starting from D ‐Glucose A new synthesis of 2′‐O‐(2‐methoxyethyl)ribonucleosides, building blocks for second‐generation antisense oligonucleotides, starting from D ‐glucose is presented. The key‐step is the transformation of 3‐O‐methoxyethylallofuranose to 2‐O‐(2‐methoxyethyl)ribose by NaIO₄ oxidation. Together with the 4′‐phenylbenzoyl protecting group, which results in crystalline intermediates, this synthesis provides an easy and cheap access to 2′‐O‐(2‐methoxyethyl)‐substituted ribonucleosides.     

Divergent Synthesis of 3‐Deoxy‐d‐manno‐oct‐2‐ulosonic Acid (Kdo) Glycosides Containing α‐(2→4)‐Linked Kdo‐Kdo Unit

A convenient and divergent approach was developed to prepare diverse bacterial 3‐deoxy‐d ‐manno‐oct‐2‐ulosonic acid (Kdo) oligosaccharides containing a Kdo‐α‐(2→4)‐Kdo fragment. The orthogonal protected α‐(2→4) linked Kdo‐Kdo disaccharide 3 , serving as a common precursor, was divergently transformed into the corresponding 8‐, 8′‐, and 4′‐hydroxy disaccharides 5 , 7 , and 14 , respectively. Then, these alcohols were glycosylated, respectively, with the 5,7‐O‐di‐tert‐butylsilylene (DTBS) protected Kdo thioglycoside donors 1 or 2 in an α‐stereoselective and high‐yielding manner to afford a range of Kdo oligosaccharides. Finally, removal of all protecting groups of the newly formed glycosides resulted in the desired free Kdo oligomer.     

New Protected Protecting Groups for the 5′‐Hydroxy Group of Deoxynucleosides by Use of 2‐(Hydroxymethyl)‐ and 2‐[(Methylamino)methyl]benzoyl Skeletons and Oxidatively Cleavable Tritylthio and (4‐Methoxytrityl)thio Groups

The new protecting groups 1a , b and 2a , b were developed for the 5′‐OH group of deoxynucleosides by utilizing the unique characters of the sulfenate and sulfenamide linkage. These new protecting groups have a 2‐(hydroxymethyl)benzoyl or 2‐[(methylamino)methyl]benzoyl skeleton whose hydroxy O‐atom or amino N‐atom was blocked with a tritylthio‐type substituent. They are removable by intramolecular cyclization following the oxidative hydrolysis of the tritylthio‐type substituents under mildly oxidative conditions (Schemes 3 and 6). Among them, 2‐{{[(4‐methoxytrityl)sulfenyl]oxy}methyl}benzoyl (MOB; 2b ) was found to be the most preferable for protection of the 5′‐OH function of deoxynucleosides. MOB can be introduced at the 5′‐OH groups of various deoxynucleosides without the protection of the 3′‐OH functions (Scheme 5). The applicability of the MOB group to a new oligodeoxynucleotide synthesis protocol without acid treatment was demonstrated by the solid‐phase synthesis of a tetrathymidylate (Scheme 8).     

Reliable Chemical Synthesis of Oligoribonucleotides (RNA) with 2′‐O‐[(Triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl(2′‐O‐tom)‐Protected Phosphoramidites

A method for the introduction of the 2′‐O‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (=tom) group into N‐acetylated, 5′‐O‐dimethoxytritylated ribonucleosides is presented. The corresponding 2′‐O‐tom‐protected phosphoramidite building blocks were obtained in pure form and were successfully employed for the routine synthesis of oligoribonucleotides on DNA synthesizers. Under DNA coupling conditions (2.5 min coupling time for a 1.5‐μmol synthesis scale) and with 5‐(benzylthio)‐1H‐tetrazole (BTT) as activator, 2′‐O‐tom‐protected phosphoramidites exhibited average coupling yields >99.4%. The combination of N‐acetyl and 2′‐O‐tom protecting groups allowed a reliable and complete two‐step deprotection, first with MeNH₂ in EtOH/H₂O and then with Bu₄NF in THF, without concomitant destruction of the product RNA sequences.     

Green Synthesis of 1‐(1,2,4‐Triazol‐4‐yl)spiro[azetidine‐2,3′‐(3H)indole]‐2′,4′(1′H)‐diones as Potential Insecticidal Agents

One pot green synthesis of 1‐(1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)spiro[azetidine‐2,3′‐(3H)‐indole]‐2′,4′(1′H)‐diones was carried out by the reaction of indole‐2,3‐diones,4‐amino‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazole and acetyl chloride/chloroacetyl chloride in ionic liquid [bmim]PF₆ with/without using a catalyst. It was also prepared by conventional method via Schiff's bases, 3‐[4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl]imino‐indol‐2‐one. Further, the corresponding phenoxy derivatives were obtained by the reaction of chloro group attached to azetidine ring with phenols. The synthesized compounds were characterized by analytical and spectral (IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and FAB mass) data. Evaluation for insecticidal activity against Periplaneta americana exhibited promising results.     

Oligodeoxynucleotides Containing 2′‐Deoxy‐1‐methyladenosine and Dimroth Rearrangement

2′‐Deoxy‐1‐methyladenosine was incorporated into synthetic oligonucleotides by phosphoramidite chemistry. Chloroacetyl protecting group and controlled anhydrous deprotection conditions were used to avoid Dimroth rearrangement. Hybridization studies of intramolecular duplexes showed that introduction of a modified residue into the loop region of the oligonucleotide hairpin increases the melting temperature. It was shown that modified oligonucleotides may be easily transformed into oligonucleotides containing 2′‐deoxy‐N⁶‐methyladenosine.     

2′‐Deoxyuridine and 2′‐Deoxyisocytidine as Constituents of DNA with Parallel Chain Orientation: The Stabilization of the iCd⋅Gd Base Pair by the 5‐Methyl Group

Parallel‐stranded oligonucleotides containing 2′‐deoxyuridine ( 2 ) and 2′‐deoxyisocytidine ( 4 ) were synthesized. The phosphoramidite 11 employed in the solid‐phase synthesis carries a (dimethylamino)methylidene residue as amino‐protecting group. This group stabilizes the acid‐labile glycosylic bond of 4 and enables the base‐catalyzed deprotection of oligonucleotides without degrading the nucleoside 4 residues. Oligonucleotide duplexes incorporating the 5‐Me derivatives of 2 (→2′‐deoxythymidine) and 4 (→2′‐deoxy‐5‐methylisocytidine), which are more stable than those containing the unmethylated nucleosides, were also compared. Depending on the nearest‐neighbor environment, Me groups provide an additional stabilization through Me/Me contacts or Me/backbone interactions.     

Semisynthesis of 3′(2′)‐O‐(Aminoacyl)‐tRNA Derivatives as Ribosomal Substrate

An efficient synthesis of (3′‐terminally) 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated pCpA derivatives is described, which could lead to the production of (aminoacyl)‐tRNAs following T4 RNA ligase mediated ligation. The tetrahydrofuranyl (thf) group was used as a permanent protective group for the 2′‐OH of the cytidine moiety which can be removed during the purification of the 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated‐pCpA. This approach allowed for a general synthesis of (3′‐terminally) 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated oligonucleotides. The fully protected pCpA 14 was synthesized by phosphoramidite chemistry and treated with NH₃ solution to remove the 2‐cyanoethyl and benzoyl groups (→ 15 ; Schemes 1 and 2). The 2′‐O‐thf‐protected‐pCpA 15 was coupled with α‐amino acid cyanomethyl esters, and the products 20a – c were deprotected and purified with AcOH buffer to afford 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated pCpA 21a – c in high yields. The 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated pCpA were efficiently ligated with tRNA(? CA) to yield (aminoacyl)‐tRNA which was an active substrate for the ribosome.     

Novel Fluoride‐Labile Nucleobase‐Protecting Groups for the Synthesis of 3′(2′)‐O‐Aminoacylated RNA Sequences

With the aim to develop a general approach to a total synthesis of aminoacylated t‐RNAs and analogues, we describe the synthesis of stabilized, aminoacylated RNA fragments, which, upon ligation, could lead to aminoacylated t‐RNA structures. Novel RNA phosphoramidites with fluoride‐labile 2′‐O‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (=tom) sugar‐protecting and N‐{{2‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]benzyl}oxy}carbonyl (=tboc) base‐protecting groups were prepared (Schemes 4 and 5), as well as a solid support containing an immobilized N⁶‐tboc‐protected adenosine with an orthogonal (photolabile) 2′‐O‐[(S)‐1‐(2‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]methyl (=(S)‐npeom) group (Scheme 6). From these building blocks, a hexameric oligoribonucleotide was prepared by automated synthesis under standard conditions (Scheme 7). After the detachment from the solid support, the resulting fully protected sequence 34 was aminoacylated with L ‐phenylalanine derivatives carrying photolabile N‐protecting groups (→ 42 and 43 ; Scheme 9). Upon removal of the fluoride‐labile sugar‐ and nucleobase‐protecting groups, the still stabilized, partially with the photolabile group protected precursors 44 and 45 , respectively, of an aminoacylated RNA sequence were obtained (Scheme 9 and Fig. 3). Photolysis of 45 under mild conditions resulted in the efficient formation of the 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated RNA sequence 46 (Fig. 4). Additionally, we carried out model investigations concerning the stability of ester bonds of aminoacylated ribonucleotide derivatives under acidic conditions (Table) and established conditions for the purification and handling of 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated RNA sequences and their stabilized precursors.     

The 2‐Cyano‐2,2‐dimethylethanimine‐N‐oxymethyl Group for the 2′‐Hydroxyl Protection of Ribonucleosides in the Solid‐Phase Synthesis of RNA Sequences

The reaction of 2‐cyano‐2‐methyl propanal with 2′‐O‐aminooxymethylribonucleosides leads to stable and yet reversible 2′‐O‐(2‐cyano‐2,2‐dimethylethanimine‐N‐oxymethyl)ribonucleosides. Following N‐protection of the nucleobases, 5′‐dimethoxytritylation and 3′‐phosphitylation, the resulting 2′‐protected ribonucleoside phosphoramidite monomers are employed in the solid‐phase synthesis of three chimeric RNA sequences, each differing in their ratios of purine/pyrimidine. When the activation of phosphoramidite monomers is performed in the presence of 5‐benzylthio‐1H‐tetrazole, coupling efficiencies averaging 99 % are obtained within 180 s. Upon completion of the RNA‐chain assemblies, removal of the nucleobase and phosphate protecting groups and release of the sequences from the solid support are carried out under standard basic conditions, whereas the cleavage of 2′‐O‐(2‐cyano‐2,2‐dimethylethanimine‐N‐oxymethyl) protective groups is effected (without releasing RNA alkylating side‐products) by treatment with tetra‐n‐butylammonium fluoride (0.5 m) in dry DMSO over a period of 24–48 h at 55 °C. Characterization of the fully deprotected RNA sequences by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), enzymatic hydrolysis, and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry confirmed the identity and quality of these sequences. Thus, the use of 2′‐O‐aminooxymethylribonucleosides in the design of new 2′‐hydroxyl protecting groups is a powerful approach to the development of a straightforward, efficient, and cost‐effective method for the chemical synthesis of high‐quality RNA sequences in the framework of RNA interference applications.     

2‐Amino‐8‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)imidazo[1,2‐a]‐1,3,5‐triazin‐4(8H)‐one: Synthesis and Conformation of a 5‐Aza‐7‐deazaguanine Fluoronucleoside

Nucleobase‐anion glycosylation of 2‐[(2‐methyl‐1‐oxopropyl)amino]imidazo[1,2‐a]‐1,3,5‐triazin‐4(8H)‐one ( 6 ) with 3,5‐di‐O‐benzoyl‐2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐α‐D ‐arabinofuranosyl bromide ( 8 ) furnishes a mixture of the benzoyl‐protected anomeric 2‐amino‐8‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐D ‐arabinofuranosyl)imidazo[1,2‐a]‐1,3,5‐triazin‐4(8H)‐ones 9 / 10 in a ratio of ca. 1 : 1. After deprotection, the inseparable anomeric mixture 3 / 4 was silylated. The obtained 5‐O‐[(1,1‐dimethylethyl)diphenylsilyl] derivatives 11 and 12 were separated and desilylated affording the nucleoside 3 and its α‐D anomer 4 . Similar to 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoroarabinoguanosine, the conformation of the sugar moiety is shifted from S towards N by the fluoro substituent in arabino configuration.     

Synthesis of the Anticodon Hairpin tRNAfMet Containing N‐{[9‐(β‐D‐Ribofuranosyl)‐9H‐purin‐6‐yl]carbamoyl}‐L‐threonine (=N6‐{{[(1S,2R)‐1‐Carboxy‐2‐hydroxypropyl]amino}carbonyl}adenosine,t6A)

As part of our studies on the structure of yeast ^tRNA_f^Met, we investigated the incorporation of N‐{[9‐(β‐D ‐ribofuranosyl)‐9H‐purin‐6‐yl]carbamoyl}‐L ‐threonine (t⁶A) in the loop of a RNA 17‐mer hairpin. The carboxylic function of the L ‐threonine moiety of t⁶A was protected with a 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl group, and a (tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl group was used for the protection of its secondary OH group. The 2′‐OH function of the standard ribonucleotide building blocks was protected with a [(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl group. Removal of the base‐labile protecting groups of the final RNA with 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU) and then with MeNH₂ was done under carefully controlled conditions to prevent hydrolysis of the carbamate function, leading to loss of the L ‐threonine moiety.     

Synthesis of optically active af‐(1‐Ethyl‐3‐methylhexahydro‐1,3‐diazin‐5‐yl)‐ and N‐(1‐Ethyl‐5‐methyloctahydro‐1,5‐diazocin‐3‐yl)pyridine‐3‐carboxamides

As part of the structure‐activity relationship of the dopamine D₂ and serotonin 5‐HT₃ receptors antagonist 1, which is a clinical candidate with a broad antiemetic activity, the synthesis and dopamine D₂ and serotonin 5‐HT₃ receptors binding affinity of (R)‐5‐bromo‐N‐(1‐ethyl‐3‐methylhexahydro‐1,3‐diazin‐5‐yl)‐ and (R)‐5‐bromo‐N‐(1‐ethyl‐5‐methyloctahydro‐1,5‐diazocin‐3‐yl)‐2‐methoxy‐6‐methylaminopyridine‐3‐carboxam‐ides ( 2 and 3 ) are described. Treatment of 1‐ethyl‐2‐(p‐toluenesulfonyl)amino‐3‐methylaminopropane dihy‐drochloride ( 4a ) with paraformaldehyde and successive deprotection gave the 5‐aminohexahydro‐1,3‐diazine 6 in excellent yield. 3‐Amino‐1‐ethyl‐5‐methyloctahydro‐1,5‐diazocine ( 15 ) was prepared from 2‐(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino‐3‐[[N‐(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)‐N‐methyl]amino]‐1‐ethylaminopropane ( 9 ) through the intramolecular amidation of (R)‐3‐[N‐[(2‐benzyloxycarbonylamino‐3‐methylamino)propyl]‐N‐ethyl]aminopropionic acid trifluoroacetate ( 12 ), followed by lithium aluminum hydride reduction of the resulting 6‐oxo‐1‐ethyl‐5‐methyloctahydrodiazocine ( 13 ) in 41% yield. Reaction of the amines 6 and 15 with 5‐bromo‐2‐methoxy‐6‐methylaminopyridine‐3‐carboxylic acid furnished the desired 2 and 3 , which showed much less potent affinity for dopamine D₂ receptors than 1 .     

Heterocyclization reaction of 2‐(2‐methylaziridin‐1‐yl)‐3‐ureidopyridines under appel's conditions

The reaction of 2‐(2‐methylaziridin‐1‐yl)‐3‐ureidopyridines 12 with triphenylphosphine, carbon tetra‐chloride, and triethylamine (Appel's conditions) led to the corresponding carbodiimides 13 , which underwent intramolecular cycloaddition reaction with aziridine under the reaction conditions to give the pyridine‐fused heterocycles, 2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazo[2′,3′:2,3]imidazo[4,5‐b]pyridines 16 and 12,13‐dihydro‐5H‐1,3 ‐benzodiazepino [2′,3′:2,3] imidazo[4,5‐b]pyridines 17 .     

Synthesis of 5‐[2‐(guanin‐9‐yl)‐ and 5‐[2‐(2‐aminopurin‐9‐yl)ethyl]‐2‐D‐ribo‐(1,2′,3′,4′‐tetrahydroxybutyl)‐1,3‐dioxane

Stereoselective synthesis of 5‐[2‐(guanin‐9‐yl)‐ and 5‐[2‐(2‐aminopurin‐9‐yl)ethyl]‐2‐D‐ribo‐(1′,2′,3′,4′‐tetrahydroxybutyl)‐1,3‐dioxane, 2‐5, as potential prodrugs of penciclovir, has been accomplished in six steps from readily available 2,3,4,5‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐aldehydo‐D‐ribose ( 6 ) and the 1,3‐diol 7 . It has been demonstrated that the use of boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF₃·Et₂O) in dichloromethane along with excess anhydrous copper(II) sulfate was crucial for the efficient formation of cyclic acetal 8 . In addition, the chromatographic separation of cis and trans isomers of the cyclic acetal at the bromide stage 10 was feasible, which was requisite for the successful stereoselective synthesis of the ribosyl derivatives 2–5 .     

Synthesis of 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(4′′‐hydroxyphenyl)‐thiazoles and their O‐glucosides

In continuation of our work, we synthesized 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐amino‐4‐(4″‐hydroxyphenyl)‐thiazole ( 3a ), which were reacted with various (aryl/hetroaryl) aldehyde to form 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(4″‐hydroxyphenyl)‐thiazoles ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4d , 4e , 4f ). Glucosylation of compounds ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4d , 4e , 4f ) have been done by using acetobromoglucose as a glucosyl donor to afford 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐4″‐O‐β‐D ‐glucosidoxyphenyl)‐thiazoles ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d , 5e , 5f ), further on deacetylation to produce 2‐(sulfamoylphenyl)‐4′‐(iminoaryl/hetroaryl)‐4‐(4″‐O‐β‐D ‐glucosidoxyphenyl)‐thiazoles ( 6a , 6b , 6c , 6d , 6e , 6f ). The compounds are confirmed by FTIR, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, and ES‐Mass spectral analysis. J. Heterocyclic Chem., (2011).     

New Synthetic Approach to Naphtho[1,2‐b]furan and 4′‐Oxo‐Substituted Spiro[cyclopropane‐1,1′(4′H)‐naphthalene] Derivatives

A one‐step synthesis of ethyl 2,3‐dihydronaphtho[1,2‐b]furan‐2‐carboxylate and/or ethyl 4′‐oxospiro[cyclopropane‐1,1′(4′H)‐naphthalene]‐2′‐carboxylate derivatives 2 and 3 , respectively, from substituted naphthalen‐1‐ols and ethyl 2,3‐dibromopropanoate is described (Scheme 1). Compounds 2 were easily aromatized (Scheme 2). In the same way, 3,4‐dibromobutan‐2‐one afforded the corresponding 1‐(2,3‐dihydronaphtho[1,2‐b]furan‐2‐yl)ethanone and/or spiro derivatives 8 and 9 , respectively (Scheme 6). A mechanism for the formation of the dihydronaphtho[1,2‐b]furan ring and of the spiro compounds 3 is proposed (Schemes 3 and 4). The structures of spiro compounds 3a and 3f were established by X‐ray structural analysis. The reactivity of compound 3a was also briefly examined (Scheme 9).