Enclosings of λ‐Fold 5‐Cycle Systems: Adding One Vertex

A k‐cycle system of a multigraph G is an ordered pair (V, C) where V is the vertex set of G and C is a set of k‐cycles, the edges of which partition the edges of G. A k‐cycle system of is known as a λ‐fold k‐cycle system of order V. A k‐cycle system of (V, C) is said to be enclosed in a k‐cycle system of if and . We settle the difficult enclosing problem for λ‐fold 5‐cycle systems with u = 1.     

Group Divisible Designs with Block Size Four and Group Type for

Nonuniform group divisible designs (GDDs) have been studied by numerous researchers for the past two decades due to their essential role in the constructions for other types of designs. In this paper, we investigate the existence problem of ‐GDDs of type for . First, we determine completely the spectrum of ‐GDDs of types and . Furthermore, for general cases, we show that for each and , a ‐GDD of type exists if and only if , and , except possibly for , and .     

Set Systems with L‐Intersections and k‐Wise L‐Intersecting Families

In this paper, by employing linear algebra methods we obtain the following main results:

• (i) Let and be two disjoint subsets of such that Suppose that is a family of subsets of such that for every pair and for every i. Then Furthermore, we extend this theorem to k‐wise L‐intersecting and obtain the corresponding result on two cross L‐intersecting families. These results show that Snevily's conjectures proposed by Snevily (2003) are true under some restricted conditions. This result also gets an improvement of a theorem of Liu and Hwang (2013).
• (ii) Let p be a prime and let and be two subsets of such that or and Suppose that is a family of subsets of [n] such that (1) for every pair (2) for every i. Then This result improves the existing upper bound substantially.

     

On the Enumeration of ‐Optimal and Minimax‐Optimal k‐Circulant Supersaturated Designs

In recent years, several methods have been proposed for constructing ‐optimal and minimax‐optimal supersaturated designs (SSDs). However, until now the enumeration problem of such designs has not been yet considered. In this paper, ‐optimal and minimax‐optimal k‐circulant SSDs with 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26 runs, factors and are enumerated in a computer search. We have also enumerated all ‐optimal and minimax‐optimal k‐circulant SSDs with (mod 4) and . The computer search utilizes the fact that theses designs are equivalent to certain 1‐rotational resolvable balanced incomplete block designs. Combinatorial properties of these resolvable designs are used to restrict the search space.     

Cycle Frames of Complete Multipartite Multigraphs ‐ III

For two graphs G and H their wreath product has vertex set in which two vertices and are adjacent whenever or and . Clearly, , where is an independent set on n vertices, is isomorphic to the complete m‐partite graph in which each partite set has exactly n vertices. A 2‐regular subgraph of the complete multipartite graph containing vertices of all but one partite set is called partial 2‐factor. For an integer λ, denotes a graph G with uniform edge multiplicity λ. Let J be a set of integers. If can be partitioned into edge‐disjoint partial 2‐factors consisting cycles of lengths from J, then we say that has a ‐cycle frame. In this paper, we show that for and , there exists a ‐cycle frame of if and only if and . In fact our results completely solve the existence of a ‐cycle frame of .     

On Small Complete Arcs and Transitive ‐Invariant Arcs in the Projective Plane

Let q be an odd prime power such that q is a power of 5 or (mod 10). In this case, the projective plane admits a collineation group G isomorphic to the alternating group A₅. Transitive G‐invariant 30‐arcs are shown to exist for every . The completeness is also investigated, and complete 30‐arcs are found for . Surprisingly, they are the smallest known complete arcs in the planes , and . Moreover, computational results are presented for the cases and . New upper bounds on the size of the smallest complete arc are obtained for .     

Flag‐Transitive 2‐ Symmetric Designs with Sporadic Socle

Let be a nontrivial 2‐ symmetric design admitting a flag‐transitive, point‐primitive automorphism group G of almost simple type with sporadic socle. We prove that there are up to isomorphism six designs, and must be one of the following: a 2‐(144, 66, 30) design with or , a 2‐(176, 50, 14) design with , a 2‐(176, 126, 90) design with or , or a 2‐(14,080, 12,636, 11,340) design with .     

‐Relative Difference Sets and Their Representations

We show that every ‐relative difference set D in relative to can be represented by a polynomial , where is a permutation for each nonzero a. We call such an f a planar function on . The projective plane Π obtained from D in the way of M. J. Ganley and E. Spence (J Combin Theory Ser A, 19(2) (1975), 134–153) is coordinatized, and we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions of Π to be a presemifield plane. We also prove that a function f on with exactly two elements in its image set and is planar, if and only if, for any .     

Optimal 1—Spontaneous Emission Error Designs*

A t‐spontaneous emission error design, denoted by t‐ SEED or t‐SEED in short, is a system of k‐subsets of a v‐set V with a partition of satisfying for any and , , where is a constant depending only on E. The design of t‐SEED was introduced by Beth et al. in 2003 (T. Beth, C. Charnes, M. Grassl, G. Alber, A. Delgado, M. Mussinger, Des Codes Cryptogr 29 (2003), 51–70) to construct quantum jump codes. The number m of designs in a t‐ SEED is called dimension, which corresponds to the number of orthogonal basis states in a quantum jump code. A t‐SEED is nondegenerate if every point appears in each of its member design. A nondegenerate t‐SEED is called optimal when it achieves the largest possible dimension. This paper investigates the dimension of optimal 1‐SEEDs, in which Baranyai's Lemma plays a significant role and the hypergraph distribution is closely related as well. Several classes of optimal 1‐SEEDs are shown to exist. In particular, we determine the exact dimensions of optimal 1‐ SEEDs for all orders v and block sizes k with .     

The Existence and Construction of (K5∖e)‐Designs of Orders 27, 135, 162, and 216

The problem of the existence of a decomposition of the complete graph into disjoint copies of has been solved for all admissible orders n, except for 27, 36, 54, 64, 72, 81, 90, 135, 144, 162, 216, and 234. In this paper, I eliminate 4 of these 12 unresolved orders. Let Γ be a ‐design. I show that divides 2^k3 for some and that . I construct ‐designs by prescribing as an automorphism group, and show that up to isomorphism there are exactly 24 ‐designs with as an automorphism group. Moreover, I show that the full automorphism group of each of these designs is indeed . Finally, the existence of ‐designs of orders 135, 162, and 216 follows immediately by the recursive constructions given by G. Ge and A. C. H. Ling, SIAM J Discrete Math 21(4) (2007), 851–864.     

Partitions of V(n,q) into 2‐ and s‐Dimensional Subspaces

Let denote a vector space of dimension n over the field with q elements. A set of subspaces of V is a (vector space) partition of V if every nonzero element of V is contained in exactly one subspace in . Suppose that is a partition of V with subspaces of dimension for . Then we call the type of the partition . Which possible types correspond to actual partitions is in general an open question. We prove that for any odd integer and for any integer , the existence of partitions of across a suitable range of types guarantees the existence of partitions of of essentially all the types for any integer . We then apply this result to construct new classes of partitions of V. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Combin. Designs 20: 467‐482, 2012     

Some Results on 1‐Rotational Hamiltonian Cycle Systems

A Hamiltonian cycle system of (briefly, a HCS(v)) is 1‐rotational under a (necessarily binary) group G if it admits G as an automorphism group acting sharply transitively on all but one vertex. We first prove that for any there exists a 3‐perfect 1‐rotational HCS. This allows to get the existence of another infinite class of 3‐perfect (but not Hamiltonian) cycle decompositions of the complete graph. Then we prove that the full automorphism group of a 1‐rotational HCS under G is G itself unless the HCS is the 2‐transitive one. This allows us to give a partial answer to the problem of determining which abstract groups are the full automorphism group of a HCS. Finally, we revisit and simplify by means of a careful group theoretic discussion a formula by Bailey, Ollis, and Preece on the number of inequivalent 1‐rotational HCSs under G. This leads us to a formula counting all 1‐rotational HCSs up to isomorphism. Though this formula heavily depends on some parameters that are hard to compute, it allows us to say that, for any , there are at least nonisomorphic 1‐rotational (and hence symmetric) HCS().     

On ‐Cocyclic Hadamard Matrices

A characterization of ‐cocyclic Hadamard matrices is described, depending on the notions of distributions, ingredients, and recipes. In particular, these notions lead to the establishment of some bounds on the number and distribution of 2‐coboundaries over to use and the way in which they have to be combined in order to obtain a ‐cocyclic Hadamard matrix. Exhaustive searches have been performed, so that the table in p. 132 in A. Baliga, K. J. Horadam, Australas. J. Combin., 11 (1995), 123–134 is corrected and completed. Furthermore, we identify four different operations on the set of coboundaries defining ‐cocyclic matrices, which preserve orthogonality. We split the set of Hadamard matrices into disjoint orbits, define representatives for them, and take advantage of this fact to compute them in an easier way than the usual purely exhaustive way, in terms of diagrams. Let be the set of cocyclic Hadamard matrices over having a symmetric diagram. We also prove that the set of Williamson‐type matrices is a subset of of size .     

Cycle Extensions in BIBD Block‐Intersection Graphs

A cycle C in a graph G is extendable if there is some other cycle in G that contains each vertex of C plus one additional vertex. A graph is cycle extendable if every non‐Hamilton cycle in the graph is extendable. A balanced incomplete block design, BIBD, consists of a set V of v elements and a block set of k‐subsets of V such that each 2‐subset of V occurs in exactly λ of the blocks of . The block‐intersection graph of a design is the graph having as its vertex set and such that two vertices of are adjacent if and only if their corresponding blocks have nonempty intersection. In this paper, we prove that the block‐intersection graph of any BIBD is cycle extendable. Furthermore, we present a polynomial time algorithm for constructing cycles of all possible lengths in a block‐intersection graph.     

Embedding Partial k‐Star Designs

A k‐star is the complete bipartite graph . Let G and H be graphs, and let be a partial H‐decomposition of G. A partial H‐decomposition, , of another graph is called an embedding of provided that and G is a subgraph of . We find an embedding of a partial k‐star decomposition of into a k‐star decomposition of , where s is at most if k is odd, and if k is even.     

The Hamilton–Waterloo Problem for ‐Factors and ‐Factors

The Hamilton–Waterloo problem asks for a 2‐factorization of (for v odd) or minus a 1‐factor (for v even) into ‐factors and ‐factors. We completely solve the Hamilton–Waterloo problem in the case of C₃‐factors and ‐factors for .     

Large Cross‐Free Sets in Steiner Triple Systems

A cross‐free set of size m in a Steiner triple system is three pairwise disjoint m‐element subsets such that no intersects all the three ‐s. We conjecture that for every admissible n there is an STS(n) with a cross‐free set of size which if true, is best possible. We prove this conjecture for the case , constructing an STS containing a cross‐free set of size 6k. We note that some of the 3‐bichromatic STSs, constructed by Colbourn, Dinitz, and Rosa, have cross‐free sets of size close to 6k (but cannot have size exactly 6k). The constructed STS shows that equality is possible for in the following result: in every 3‐coloring of the blocks of any Steiner triple system STS(n) there is a monochromatic connected component of size at least (we conjecture that equality holds for every admissible n). The analog problem can be asked for r‐colorings as well, if and is a prime power, we show that the answer is the same as in case of complete graphs: in every r‐coloring of the blocks of any STS(n), there is a monochromatic connected component with at least points, and this is sharp for infinitely many n.     

Detachments of Amalgamated 3‐Uniform Hypergraphs Factorization Consequences

A is a hypergraph obtained from by splitting some or all of its vertices into more than one vertex. Amalgamating a hypergraph can be thought of as taking , partitioning its vertices, then for each element of the partition squashing the vertices to form a single vertex in the amalgamated hypergraph . In this paper, we use Nash‐Williams lemma on laminar families to prove a detachment theorem for amalgamated 3‐uniform hypergraphs, which yields a substantial generalization of previous amalgamation theorems by Hilton, Rodger, and Nash‐Williams. To demonstrate the power of our detachment theorem, we show that the complete 3‐uniform n‐partite multihypergraph can be expressed as the union of k edge‐disjoint factors, where for , is ‐regular, if and only if:

1. for all ,
2. for each i, , and
3. .

     

Group Divisible Covering Designs with Block Size 4: A Type of Covering Array with Row Limit

A k‐GDCD, group divisible covering design, of type is a triple , where V is a set of gu elements, is a partition of V into u sets of size g, called groups, and is a collection of k‐subsets of V, called blocks, such that every pair of elements in V is either contained in a unique group or there is at least one block containing it, but not both. This family of combinatorial objects is equivalent to a special case of the graph covering problem and a generalization of covering arrays, which we call CARLs. In this paper, we show that there exists an integer such that for any positive integers g and , there exists a 4‐GDCD of type which in the worst case exceeds the Schönheim lower bound by δ blocks, except maybe when (1) and , or (2) , , and or . To show this, we develop constructions of 4‐GDCDs, which depend on two types of ingredients: essential, which are used multiple times, and auxiliary, which are used only once in the construction. If the essential ingredients meet the lower bound, the products of the construction differ from the lower bound by as many blocks as the optimal size of the auxiliary ingredient differs from the lower bound.