Heavy‐Atom Labeled Transmembrane β‐Peptides: Synthesis,CD‐Spectroscopy,and X‐ray Diffraction Studies in Model Lipid Multilayer

Transmembrane β‐peptides are promising candidates for the design of well‐controlled membrane anchors in lipid membranes. Here, we present the synthesis of transmembrane β‐peptides with and without tryptophan anchors, as well as a novel iodine‐labeled d ‐β³‐amino acid. By using one or more of the heavy‐atom labeled amino acids as markers, the orientation of the helical peptide was inferred based on the electron‐density profile determined by X‐ray reflectivity. The β‐peptides were synthesized through manual Fmoc‐based solid‐phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) and reconstituted in unilamellar vesicles forming a right‐handed 3₁₄‐helix secondary structure, as shown by circular dichroism spectroscopy. We then integrated the β‐peptide into solid‐supported membrane stacks and carried out X‐ray reflectivity and grazing incidence small‐angle X‐ray scattering to determine the β‐peptide orientation and its effect on the membrane bilayers. These β‐peptides adopt a well‐ordered transmembrane motif in the solid‐supported model membrane, maintaining the basic structure of the original bilayer with some distinct alterations. Notably, the helical tilt angle, which accommodates the positive hydrophobic mismatch, induces a tilt of the acyl chains. The tilted chains, in turn, lead to a membrane thinning effect.     

Controlling the Helix Handedness of ααβ‐Peptide Foldamers through Sequence Shifting

Peptide foldamers containing both cis ‐β‐aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid and α‐amino acid residues combined in various sequence patterns (ααβ, αααβ, αβααβ, and ααβαααβ) were screened using CD and NMR spectroscopy for the tendency to form helices. ααβ‐Peptides were found to fold into an unprecedented and well‐defined 16/17/15/18/14/17‐helix. By extending the length of the sequence or shifting a fragment of the sequence from one terminus to another in ααβ‐peptides, the balance between left‐handed and right‐handed helix populations present in the solution can be controlled. Engineering of the peptide sequence could lead to compounds with either a strong propensity for the selected helix sense or a mixture of helical conformations of opposite senses.     

Chirality and Template‐Mediated Induction of Helical Preferences in Achiral β‐Peptides

This study describes chirality‐ or template‐mediated helical induction in achiral β‐peptides for the first time. A strategy of end capping β‐peptides derived from β‐hGly (the smallest achiral β‐amino acid) with a chiral β‐amino acid that possesses a carbohydrate side chain (β‐Caa; C‐linked carbo β‐amino acid) or a small, robust helical template derived from β‐Caas, was adopted to investigate folding propensity. A single chiral (R)‐β‐Caa residue at the C‐ or N‐terminus in these oligomers led to a preponderance of right‐handed 12/10‐helical folds, which was reiterated more strongly in peptides capped at both the C‐ and N‐terminus. Likewise, the presence of a template (a 12/10‐helical trimer) at both the C‐ and N‐terminus resulted in a very robust helix. The propagation of the helical fold and its sustenance was found in a homo‐oligomeric sequence with as many as seven β‐hGly residues. In both cases, the induction of helicity was stronger from the N terminus, whereas an anchor at the C terminus resulted in reduced helical propensity. Although these oligomers have been theoretically predicted to favor a 12/10‐mixed helix in apolar solvents, this study provides the first experimental evidence for their existence. Diastereotopicity was found in both the methylene groups of the β‐hGly moieties due to chirality. Additionally, the β‐hGly units have shown split behavior in the conformational space to accommodate the 12/10‐helix. Thus, end capping to assist chiralty‐ or template‐mediated helical induction and stabilization in achiral β‐peptides is a very attractive strategy.     

Water‐Insensitive Synthesis of Poly‐β‐Peptides with Defined Architecture

Biocompatible and proteolysis‐resistant poly‐β‐peptides have broad applications and are dominantly synthesized via the harsh and water‐sensitive ring‐opening polymerization of β‐lactams in a glovebox or using a Schlenk line, catalyzed by the strong base LiN(SiMe₃)₂. We have developed a controllable and water‐insensitive ring‐opening polymerization of β‐amino acid N‐thiocarboxyanhydrides (β‐NTAs) that can be operated in open vessels to prepare poly‐β‐peptides in high yields, with diverse functional groups, variable chain length, narrow dispersity and defined architecture. These merits imply wide applications of β‐NTA polymerization and resulting poly‐β‐peptides, which is validated by the finding of a HDP‐mimicking poly‐β‐peptide with potent antimicrobial activities. The living β‐NTA polymerization enables the controllable synthesis of random, block copolymers and easy tuning of both terminal groups of polypeptides, which facilitated the unravelling of the antibacterial mechanism using the fluorophore‐labelled poly‐β‐peptide.     

Validation of the GROMOS 54A7 Force Field Regarding Mixed α/β‐Peptide Molecules

A molecular‐dynamics (MD) simulation study of two heptapeptides containing α‐ and β‐amino acid residues is presented. According to NMR experiments, the two peptides differ in dominant fold when solvated in MeOH: peptide 3 adopts predominantly β‐hairpin‐like conformations, while peptide 8 adopts a 14/15‐helical fold. The MD simulations largely reproduce the experimental data. Application of NOE atom? atom distance restraining improves the agreement with experimental data, but reduces the conformational sampling. Peptide 3 shows a variety of conformations, while still agreeing with the NOE and ³J‐coupling data, whereas the conformational ensemble of peptide 8 is dominated by one helical conformation. The results confirm the suitability of the GROMOS 54A7 force field for simulation or structure refinement of mixed α/β‐peptides in MeOH.     

“Helix‐in‐Helix” Superstructure Formation through Encapsulation of Fullerene‐Bound Helical Peptides within a Helical Poly(methyl methacrylate) Cavity

A one‐handed 3₁₀‐helical hexapeptide is efficiently encapsulated within the helical cavity of st‐PMMA when a fullerene (C₆₀) derivative is introduced at the C‐terminal end of the peptide. The encapsulation is accompanied by induction of a preferred‐handed helical conformation in the st‐PMMA backbone with the same‐handedness as that of the hexapeptide to form a crystalline st‐PMMA/peptide‐C₆₀ inclusion complex with a unique optically active helix‐in‐helix structure. Although the st‐PMMA is unable to encapsulate the 3₁₀‐helical peptide without the terminal C₆₀ unit, the helical hollow space of the st‐PMMA is almost filled by the C₆₀‐bound peptides. This result suggests that the C₆₀ moiety can serve as a versatile molecular carrier of specific molecules and polymers in the helical cavity of the st‐PMMA for the formation of an inclusion complex, thus producing unique supramolecular soft materials that cannot be prepared by other methods.     

Artificial β‐Double Helices from Achiral γ‐Peptides

Double helices are not common in polypeptides and proteins except in the peptide antibiotic gramicidin A and analogous l,d ‐peptides. In contrast to natural polypeptides, remarkable β‐double‐helical structures from achiral γ‐peptides built from α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids have been observed. The crystal structures suggest that they adopted parallel β‐double helical structures and these structures are stabilized by the interstrand backbone amide H‐bonds. Furthermore, both NMR spectroscopy and fluorescence studies support the existence of double‐helical conformations in solution. Although a variety of folded architectures featuring distinct H‐bonds have been discovered from the β‐ and γ‐peptide foldamers, this is the first report to show that achiral γ‐peptides can spontaneously intertwine into β‐double helical structures.     

Three‐Residue Turn in β‐Peptides Nucleated by a 12/10 Helix

A new three‐residue turn in β peptides nucleated by a 12/10‐mixed helix is presented. In this design, β peptides were derived from the 1:1 alternation of C‐linked carbo‐β‐amino acid ester [BocNH‐(R)‐β‐Caa_(r)‐OMe] (Boc=tert‐butyloxycarbonyl), which consisted of a D ‐ribo furanoside side chain, and β‐hGly residues. The hexapeptide with (R)‐β‐Caa_(r) at the N terminus showed the ‘turn’ stabilized by a 14‐membered NH(4) ??? CO(6) hydrogen bond at the C terminus nucleated by a robust 12/10‐mixed helix, thus providing a ‘helix‐turn’ (HT) motif. The turn and the helix were additionally stabilized by intraresidue electrostatic interaction between the furan oxygen in the carbohydrate side chain and NH in the backbone. However, the hexapeptide with a β‐hGly residue at the N terminus demonstrated the presence of a 10/12 helix through its entire length, which again showed the intraresidue interaction between NH and furan oxygen. The intraresidue NH ??? O? Me electrostatic interactions observed in the monomer, however, were absent in the peptides.     

Improved treatment of cyclic β‐amino acids and successful prediction of β‐peptide secondary structure using a modified force field: AMBER*C

We added parameters to the AMBER* force field to model cyclic β‐amino acid derivatives more accurately within the commonly used MacroModel program. In an effort to generate an improved treatment of cyclohexane and cyclopentane conformational preferences, carbon–carbon torsional parameters were modified and incorporated into a force field we call AMBER*C. Simulation of trans‐2‐aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid (trans‐ACHC) and trans‐2‐aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid (trans‐ACPC) derivatives using AMBER*C produces more realistic energy differences between (pseudo)diaxial and (pseudo)diequatorial conformations than does simulation using AMBER*. AMBER*C molecular dynamics simulations more accurately reproduce the experimental hydrogen‐bonding tendencies of simple diamide derivatives of trans‐ACHC and trans‐ACPC than do simulations using the AMBER* force field. More importantly, this modified force field allows accurate qualitative prediction of the helical secondary structures adopted by β‐amino acid homo‐oligomers. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 21: 763–773, 2000     

Helix Nucleation by the Smallest Known α‐Helix in Water

Cyclic pentapeptides (e.g. Ac‐(cyclo‐1,5)‐[KAXAD]‐NH₂; X=Ala, 1 ; Arg, 2 ) in water adopt one α‐helical turn defined by three hydrogen bonds. NMR structure analysis reveals a slight distortion from α‐helicity at the C‐terminal aspartate caused by torsional restraints imposed by the K(i)–D(i+4) lactam bridge. To investigate this effect on helix nucleation, the more water‐soluble 2 was appended to N‐, C‐, or both termini of a palindromic peptide ARAARAARA (≤5 % helicity), resulting in 67, 92, or 100 % relative α‐helicity, as calculated from CD spectra. From the C‐terminus of peptides, 2 can nucleate at least six α‐helical turns. From the N‐terminus, imperfect alignment of the Asp5 backbone amide in 2 reduces helix nucleation, but is corrected by a second unit of 2 separated by 0–9 residues from the first. These cyclic peptides are extremely versatile helix nucleators that can be placed anywhere in 5–25 residue peptides, which correspond to most helix lengths in protein–protein interactions.     

The first N‐terminal unprotected (Gly‐Aib)n peptide: H‐Gly‐Aib‐Gly‐Aib‐OtBu

Glycine (Gly) is incorporated in roughly half of all known peptaibiotic (nonribosomally biosynthesized antibiotic peptides of fungal origin) sequences and is the residue with the greatest conformational flexibility. The conformational space of Aib (α‐aminoisobutyric acid) is severely restricted by the second methyl group attached to the C_α atom. Most of the crystal structures containing Aib are N‐terminal protected. Deprotection of the N‐ or C‐terminus of peptides may alter the hydrogen‐bonding scheme and/or the structure and may facilitate crystallization. The structure reported here for glycyl‐α‐aminoisobutyrylglycyl‐α‐aminoisobutyric acid tert‐butyl ester, C₁₆H₃₀N₄O₅, describes the first N‐terminal‐unprotected (Gly‐Aib)_n peptide. The achiral peptide could form an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the C=O group of Gly1 and the N—H group of Aib4. This hydrogen bond is found in all tetrapeptides and N‐terminal‐protected tripeptides containing Aib, apart from one exception. In the present work, this hydrogen bond is not observed (N...O = 5.88 Å). Instead, every molecule is hydrogen bonded to six other symmetry‐related molecules with a total of eight hydrogen bonds per molecule. The backbone conformation starts in the right‐handed helical region (and the left‐handed helical region for the inverted molecule) and reverses the screw sense in the last two residues.     

Reversible peptide folding: Dependence on molecular force field used

Temperature‐dependent nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and CD spectra of methanol solutions of a β‐heptapeptide have been interpreted in such a way that the secondary structure, a 3₁₄‐helix, is assumed to be stable in a temperature range of between 298 and 393 K. This is in contrast to the results of a 50‐ns molecular dynamics simulation using the GROMOS 96 force field, which found a melting temperature of about 340 K. This discrepancy is addressed by further computational studies using the OPLS‐AA force field. The conformational energetics of N‐formyl‐3‐aminobutanamide in vacuo are obtained using ab initio and density functional quantum‐mechanical calculations at the HF/6‐31G*, B3LYP/6‐31G*, and B3LYP/6‐311+G* levels of theory. The results permit development of torsional parameters for the OPLS‐AA force field that reproduce the conformational energetics of the monomer. By varying the development procedure, three parameter sets are obtained that focus on reproducing either low‐energy or high‐energy conformations. These parameter sets are tested by simulating the reversible folding of the β‐heptapeptide in methanol. The melting temperature of the helix formed (>360 K) is found to be higher than the one obtained from simulations using the GROMOS 96 force field (∼340 K). Differences in the potential energy functions of the latter two force fields are evaluated and point to the origins of the difference in stability. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 21: 774–787, 2000     

N‐(tert‐Butoxycarbonyl)‐L‐valyl‐L‐valine methyl ester: a twisted parallel β‐sheet in the crystal structure of a protected dipeptide

The title compound, C₁₆H₃₀N₂O₅, crystallizes with three molecules in the asymmetric unit, each adopting a β‐strand/polyproline II backbone conformation. The main‐chain functional groups are hydrogen bonded into tapes having the characteristics of parallel β‐sheets. Each tape has a left‐handed twist and thus forms a helix, with six peptide molecules needed to complete a full 360° rotation. A comparison of hydrogen‐bond lengths and twisting modes is made with other related structures of protected dipeptides and with a hexapeptide derived from amyloid‐β containing the Val–Val segment. Additionally, a comparison of the backbone conformation is made with that of the Val141–Val142 segment of the water channel aquaporin‐4 (AQP4).     

Using one‐step perturbation to predict the effect of changing force‐field parameters on the simulated folding equilibrium of a β‐peptide in solution

Computer simulation using molecular dynamics is increasingly used to simulate the folding equilibria of peptides and small proteins. Yet, the quality of the obtained results depends largely on the quality of the force field used. This comprises the solute as well as the solvent model and their energetic and entropic compatibility. It is, however, computational very expensive to perform test simulations for each combination of force‐field parameters. Here, we use the one‐step perturbation technique to predict the change of the free enthalpy of folding of a β‐peptide in methanol solution due to changing a variety of force‐field parameters. The results show that changing the solute backbone partial charges affects the folding equilibrium, whereas this is relatively insensitive to changes in the force constants of the torsional energy terms of the force field. Extending the cut‐off distance for nonbonded interactions beyond 1.4 nm does not affect the folding equilibrium. The same result is found for a change of the reaction‐field permittivity for methanol from 17.7 to 30. The results are not sensitive to the criterion, e.g., atom‐positional RMSD or number of hydrogen bonds, that is used to distinguish folded and unfolded conformations. Control simulations with perturbed Hamiltonians followed by backward one‐step perturbation indicated that quite large perturbations still yield reliable results. Yet, perturbing all solvent molecules showed where the limitations of the one‐step perturbation technique are met. The evaluated methodology constitutes an efficient tool in force‐field development for molecular simulation by reducing the number of required separate simulations by orders of magnitude. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010     

Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of Hybrid α/β‐Dipeptides Incorporating S‐Glycosyl‐β2,2‐Amino Acids

We synthesized and carried out the conformational analysis of several hybrid dipeptides consisting of an α‐amino acid attached to a quaternary glyco‐β‐amino acid. In particular, we combined a S‐glycosylated β^2,2‐amino acid and two different types of α‐amino acid, namely, aliphatic (alanine) and aromatic (phenylalanine and tryptophan) in the sequence of hybrid α/β‐dipeptides. The key step in the synthesis involved the ring‐opening reaction of a chiral cyclic sulfamidate, inserted in the peptidic sequence, with a sulfur‐containing nucleophile by using 1‐thio‐β‐D ‐glucopyranose derivatives. This reaction of glycosylation occurred with inversion of configuration at the quaternary center. The conformational behavior in aqueous solution of the peptide backbone and the glycosidic linkage for all synthesized hybrid glycopeptides was analyzed by using a protocol that combined NMR experiments and molecular dynamics with time‐averaged restraints (MD‐tar). Interestingly, the presence of the sulfur heteroatom at the quaternary center of the β‐amino acid induced θ torsional angles close to 180° (anti). Notably, this value changed to 60° (gauche) when the peptidic sequence displayed aromatic α‐amino acids due to the presence of CH–π interactions between the phenyl or indole ring and the methyl groups of the β‐amino acid unit.     

Ambidextrous α,γ‐Hybrid Peptide Foldamers

Molecular chirality is ubiquitous in nature. The natural biopolymers, proteins and DNA, preferred a right‐handed helical bias due to the inherent stereochemistry of the monomer building blocks. Here, we are reporting a rare co‐existence of left‐ and right‐handed helical conformations and helix‐terminating property at the C‐terminus within a single molecule of α,γ‐hybrid peptide foldamers composed of achiral Aib (α‐aminoisobutyric acid) and 3,3‐dimethyl‐substituted γ‐amino acid (Adb; 4‐amino‐3,3‐dimethylbutanoic acid). At the molecular level, the left‐ and right‐handed helical screw sense of α,γ‐hybrid peptides are representing a macroscopic tendril perversion. The pronounced helix‐terminating behaviour of C‐terminal Adb residues was further explored to design helix–Schellman loop mimetics and to study their conformations in solution and single crystals. The stereochemical constraints of dialkyl substitutions on γ‐amino acids showed a marked impact on the folding behaviour of α,γ‐hybrid peptides.     

Peptide N‐Amination Supports β‐Sheet Conformations

The conformational heterogeneity of backbone N‐substituted peptides limits their ability to adopt stable secondary structures. Herein, we describe a practical synthesis of backbone aminated peptides that readily adopt β‐sheet folds. Data derived from model N‐amino peptides suggest that extended conformations are stabilized through cooperative steric, electrostatic, and hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

Exploiting Aromatic Interactions for β‐Peptide Foldamer Helix Stabilization: A Significant Design Element

Tetrameric H10/12 helix stabilization was achieved by the application of aromatic side‐chains in β‐peptide oligomers by intramolecular backbone–side chain CH–π interactions. Because of the enlarged hydrophobic surface of the oligomers, a further aim was the investigation of the self‐assembly in a polar medium for the β‐peptide H10/12 helices. NMR, ECD, and molecular modeling results indicated that the oligomers formed by cis‐[1S,2S]‐ or cis‐[1R,2R]‐1‐amino‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydronaphthalene‐2‐carboxylic acid (ATENAC) and cis‐[1R,2S]‐ or cis‐[1S,2R]‐2‐aminocyclohex‐3‐enecarboxylic acid (ACHEC) residues promote stable H10/12 helix formation with an alternating backbone configuration even at the tetrameric chain length. These results support the view that aromatic side‐chains can be applied for helical structure stabilization. Importantly, this is the first observation of a stable H10/12 helix with tetrameric chain‐length. The hydrophobically driven self‐assembly was achieved for the helix‐forming oligomers, seen as vesicles in transmission electron microscopy images. The self‐association phenomenon, which supports the helical secondary structure of these oligomers, depends on the hydrophobic surface area, because a higher number of aromatic side‐chains yielded larger vesicles. These results serve as an essential element for the design of helices relating to the H10/12 helix. Moreover, they open up a novel area for bioactive foldamer construction, while the hydrophobic area gained through the aromatic side‐chains may yield important receptor–ligand interaction surfaces, which can provide amplified binding strength.     

Folding–Unfolding Equilibrium of a Methylidene‐Substituted β‐Peptide

β‐Peptides possess the ability to fold into secondary structure elements, and this property, together with resistance to biodegradation, makes these compounds interesting for pharmaceutical applications. Recently, a novel class of β‐peptides containing methylidene moieties was described. The GROMOS 53A6 force field was used to simulate the folding equilibrium of a β³‐hexapeptide with methylidene (CH₂?) groups at all six CA‐atoms. Due to the rotational barriers induced by these methylidene groups, the helical secondary‐structure elements, normally found in β³‐peptides, are disfavored in this molecule. Simulations, started from fully extended and 3₁₄‐helical conformations, showed that the molecule adopts a complete 2₈‐helix for ca. 5% of the time and partial 2₈‐helical conformations for ca. 20% of the time. Yet, as suggested by experiments, the folding equilibrium is dominated by unfolded conformations.