A B–C Double Bond Unit Coordinated to Platinum: An Alkylideneboryl Ligand that Is Isoelectronic to Neutral Aminoborylene Ligands

The reaction of [Pt(PCy₃)₂] with Br₂B‐CH(SiMe₃)₂ resulted in generation of the first alkylideneboryl complex, trans‐[Br(Cy₃P)₂Pt{B?CH(SiMe₃)}], with concomitant elimination of Me₃SiBr. The trans bromide ligand of the alkylideneboryl complex was readily substituted by a methyl group upon treatment with methyllithium, leading to another alkylideneboryl complex, trans‐[Me(Cy₃P)₂Pt{B?CH(SiMe₃)}]. Various spectrochemical techniques, single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography, and quantum chemical calculations confirmed the formulation of a double bond between the boron and the carbon atom. The theoretical studies also provided evidence for the stronger trans influence of the alkylideneboryl ligand over iminoboryl and oxoboryl ligands.     

trans-[Pt(BCat')Me(PCy3)2]: an experimental case study of reductive elimination processes in Pt-Boryls through associative mechanisms

A stable trans‐(alkyl)(boryl) platinum complex trans‐[Pt(BCat′)Me(PCy₃)₂] (Cat′=Cat‐4‐tBu; Cy=cyclohexyl=C₆H₁₁) was synthesised by salt metathesis reaction of trans‐[Pt(BCat′)Br(PCy₃)₂] with LiMe and was fully characterised. Investigation of the reactivity of the title compound showed complete reductive elimination of Cat′BMe at 80 °C within four weeks. This process may be accelerated by the addition of a variety of alkynes, thereby leading to the formation of the corresponding η²‐alkyne platinum complexes, of which [Pt(η²‐MeCCMe)(PCy₃)₂] was characterised by X‐ray crystallography. Conversion of the trans‐configured title compound to a cis derivative remained unsuccessful due to an instantaneous reductive elimination process during the reaction with chelating phosphines. Treatment of trans‐[Pt(BCat′)Me(PCy₃)₂] with Cat₂B₂ led to the formation of CatBMe and Cat′BMe. In the course of further investigations into this reaction, indications for two indistinguishable reaction mechanisms were found: 1) associative formation of a six‐coordinate platinum centre prior to reductive elimination and 2) σ‐bond metathesis of B? B and C? Pt bonds. Mechanism 1 provides a straightforward explanation for the formation of both methylboranes. Scrambling of diboranes(4) Cat₂B₂ and Cat′₂B₂ in the presence of [Pt(PCy₃)₂], fully reductive elimination of CatBMe or Cat′BMe from trans‐[Pt(BCat′)Me(PCy₃)₂] in the presence of sub‐stoichiometric amounts of Cat₂B₂, and evidence for the reversibility of the oxidative addition of Cat₂B₂ to [Pt(PCy₃)₂] all support mechanism 2, which consists of sequential equilibria reactions. Furthermore, the solid‐state molecular structure of cis‐[Pt(BCat)₂(PCy₃)₂] and cis‐[Pt(BCat′)₂(PCy₃)₂] were investigated. The remarkably short B? B separations in both bis(boryl) complexes suggest that the two boryl ligands in each case are more loosely bound to the Pt^II centre than in related bis(boryl) species.     

Y,Lu, and Gd Complexes of NCO/NCS Pincer Ligands: Synthesis,Characterization, and Catalysis in the cis‐1,4‐Selective Polymerization of Isoprene

A series of NCO/NCS pincer precursors, 3‐(Ar²OCH₂)‐2‐Br‐(Ar¹N?CH)C₆H₃ ((^Ar1NCO^Ar2)Br, 3a , 3b , 3c , 3d ) and 3‐(2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃SCH₂)‐2‐Br‐(Ar¹N?CH)C₆H₃ ((^Ar1NCS^Me)Br, 4a and 4b ) were synthesized and characterized. The reactions of [^Ar1NCO^Ar2]Br/ [^Ar1NCS^Me]Br with nBuLi and the subsequent addition of the rare‐earth‐metal chlorides afforded their corresponding rare‐earth‐metal–pincer complexes, that is, [(^Ar1NCO^Ar2)YCl₂(thf)₂] ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d ), [(^Ar1NCO^Ar2)LuCl₂(thf)₂] ( 6a , 6d ), [(^Ar1NCO^Ar2)GdCl₂(thf)₂] ( 7 ), [{(^Ar1NCS^Me)Y(μ‐Cl)}₂{(μ‐Cl)Li(thf)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 8 , 9 ), and [{(^Ar1NCS^Me)Gd(μ‐Cl)}₂{(μ‐Cl)Li(thf)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 10 , 11 ). These diamagnetic complexes were characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and the molecular structures of compounds 5a , 6a , 7 , and 10 were well‐established by X‐ray diffraction analysis. In compounds 5a , 6a , and 7 , all of the metal centers adopted distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometries with the NCO donors and two oxygen atoms from the coordinated THF molecules in equatorial positions and the two chlorine atoms in apical positions. Complex 10 is a dimer in which the two equal moieties are linked by two chlorine atoms and two Cl? Li? Cl bridges. In each part, the gadolinium atom adopts a distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometry. Activated with alkylaluminum and borate, the gadolinium and yttrium complexes showed various activities towards the polymerization of isoprene, thereby affording highly cis‐1,4‐selective polyisoprene, whilst the NCO? lutetium complexes were inert under the same conditions.     

Synthesis and characterization of new (N‐diphenylphosphino)‐isopropylanilines and their complexes: crystal structure of (Ph2P S)NH?C6H4?4?CH(CH3)2 and catalytic activity of palladium(II) complexes in the Heck and Suzuki cross‐coupling reactions

Three new (N‐diphenylphosphino)‐isopropylanilines, having isopropyl substituent at the carbon 2‐ (1) 4‐ (2) or 2,6‐ (3) were prepared from the aminolysis of chlorodiphenylphosphine with 2‐isopropylaniline, 4‐isopropylaniline or 2,6‐diisopropylaniline, respectively, under anaerobic conditions. Oxidation of 1,2 and 3 with aqueous hydrogen peroxide, elemental sulfur or gray selenium gave the corresponding oxides, sulfides and selenides (Ph₂P?E)NH? C₆H₄? 2‐CH(CH₃)₂, (Ph₂P?E)NH? C₆H₄? 4‐CH(CH₃)₂ and (Ph₂P?E)NH? C₆H₄? 2,6‐{CH(CH₃)₂}₂, where E = O, S, or Se, respectively. The reaction of [M(cod)Cl₂] (M = Pd, Pt; cod = 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) with two equivalents of 1,2 or 3 yields the corresponding monodendate complexes [M((Ph₂P)NH? C₆H₄? 2‐CH(CH₃)₂)₂Cl₂], M = Pd 1d, M = Pt 1e, [M((Ph₂P)NH? C₆H₄? 4‐CH(CH₃)₂)₂Cl₂], M = Pd 2d, M = Pt 2e and [M((Ph₂P)NH? C₆H₄? 2,6‐(CH(CH₃)₂)₂)₂Cl₂], M = Pd 3d, M = Pt 3e, respectively. All the compounds were isolated as analytically pure substances and characterized by NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. Furthermore, representative solid‐state structure of [(Ph₂P?S)NH? C₆H₄? 4‐CH(CH₃)₂] (2b) was determined using single crystal X‐ray diffraction technique. The complexes 1d–3d were tested and found to be highly active catalysts in the Suzuki coupling and Heck reaction, affording biphenyls and stilbenes, respectively. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Platinum trans‐Bis(borirene) Complexes Displaying Coplanarity and Communication Across a Platinum Metal Center

Ambient‐temperature photolysis of the aminoborylene complex [(OC)₅Cr?B?N(SiMe₃)₂] in the presence of a series of trans‐bis(alkynyl)platinum(II) precursors of the type trans‐[Pt(CCAr)₂(PEt₃)₂] (Ar=Ph, p‐C₆H₄OMe, and p‐C₆H₄CF₃) successfully leads to twofold transfer of the borylene moiety [ : B?N(SiMe₃)₂] onto the alkyne functionalities. The alkynyl precursors and resultant bis(borirene)platinum(II) complexes formed are of the type trans‐[Pt(B{?N(SiMe₃)₂}C?CAr)₂(PEt₃)₂] (Ar=Ph, p‐C₆H₄OMe, and p‐C₆H₄CF₃). These species have all been successfully characterized by NMR, IR, and UV/Vis spectroscopy as well as by elemental analysis. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction has verified that these trans‐bis(borirene)platinum(II) complexes display coplanarity between the twin three‐membered rings across the platinum core in the solid state and stand as the first examples of coplanar conformations of twin borirene systems. These complexes were modeled using density functional theory (DFT), providing information helpful in determining the ability of the transition metal core to interact with each individual borirene ring system and allowing for the observed coplanarity of these rings in the solid state. This proposed transition metal interaction with the twin borirene systems is manifested in the electronic characterization of these borirene species, which display divergent photophysical UV/Vis spectroscopic profiles compared to a previously published mono(borirene)platinum(II) complex.     

The Role of 2,6‐Diaminopyridine Ligands in the Isolation of an Unprecedented,Low‐Valent Tin Complex

Stabilization of the central atom in an oxidation state of zero through coordination of neutral ligands is a common bonding motif in transition‐metal chemistry. However, the stabilization of main‐group elements in an oxidation state of zero by neutral ligands is rare. Herein, we report that the transamination reaction of the DAMPY ligand system (DAMPY=2,6‐[ArNH‐CH₂]₂(NC₅H₃) (Ar=C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)) with Sn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ produces the DIMPYSn complex (DIMPY=(2,6‐[ArN?CH]₂(NC₅H₃)) with the Sn atom in a formal oxidation state of zero. This is the first example of a tin compound stabilized in a formal oxidation state of zero by only one donor molecule. Furthermore, three related low‐valent Sn^II complexes, including a [DIMPYSn^IICl]⁺[SnCl₃]^? ion pair, a bisstannylene DAMPY{Sn^II[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂}₂, and the enamine complex MeDIMPYSn^II, were isolated. Experimental results and the conclusions drawn are also supported by theoretical studies at the density functional level of theory and ¹¹⁹Sn Mössbauer spectroscopy.     

Cationic Allyl Complexes of the Rare‐Earth Metals: Synthesis,Structural Characterization,and 1,3‐Butadiene Polymerization Catalysis

Monocationic bis‐allyl complexes [Ln(η³‐C₃H₅)₂(thf)₃]⁺[B(C₆X₅)₄]^? (Ln=Y, La, Nd; X=H, F) and dicationic mono‐allyl complexes of yttrium and the early lanthanides [Ln(η³‐C₃H₅)(thf)₆]²⁺[BPh₄]₂^? (Ln=La, Nd) were prepared by protonolysis of the tris‐allyl complexes [Ln(η³‐C₃H₅)₃(diox)] (Ln=Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm; diox=1,4‐dioxane) isolated as a 1,4‐dioxane‐bridged dimer (Ln=Ce) or THF adducts [Ln(η³‐C₃H₅)₃(thf)₂] (Ln=Ce, Pr). Allyl abstraction from the neutral tris‐allyl complex by a Lewis acid, ER₃ (Al(CH₂SiMe₃)₃, BPh₃) gave the ion pair [Ln(η³‐C₃H₅)₂(thf)₃]⁺[ER₃(η¹‐CH₂CH?CH₂)]^? (Ln=Y, La; ER₃=Al(CH₂SiMe₃)₃, BPh₃). Benzophenone inserts into the La? C_allyl bond of [La(η³‐C₃H₅)₂(thf)₃]⁺[BPh₄]^? to form the alkoxy complex [La{OCPh₂(CH₂CH?CH₂)}₂(thf)₃]⁺[BPh₄]^?. The monocationic half‐sandwich complexes [Ln(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₃)(η³‐C₃H₅)(thf)₂]⁺[B(C₆X₅)₄]^? (Ln=Y, La; X=H, F) were synthesized from the neutral precursors [Ln(η⁵‐C₅Me₄SiMe₃)(η³‐C₃H₅)₂(thf)] by protonolysis. For 1,3‐butadiene polymerization catalysis, the yttrium‐based systems were more active than the corresponding lanthanum or neodymium homologues, giving polybutadiene with approximately 90 % 1,4‐cis stereoselectivity.     

Synthese eines funktionalen Aluminiumalkinids,Me3C‐C≡C‐AlBr2, und dessen Reaktionen mit der sperrigen Lithiumverbindung LiCH(SiMe3)2

Synthesis of a Functional Aluminium Alkynide, Me₃C‐C≡C‐AlBr₂, and its Reactions with the Bulky Lithium Compound LiCH(SiMe₃)₂ Treatment of aluminium tribromide with the lithium alkynide (Li)C≡C‐CMe₃ afforded the aluminium alkynide Me₃C‐C≡C‐AlBr₂ ( 1 ) in an almost quantitative yield. 1 crystallizes with trimeric formula units possessing Al₃C₃ heterocycles and the anionic carbon atoms of the alkynido groups in the bridging positions. A dynamic equilibrium was determined in solution which probably comprises trimeric and dimeric formula units. Reaction of 1 with one equivalent of LiCH(SiMe₃)₂ yielded the compound [Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al(Br)‐CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ), which is a dimer via Al‐C‐Al bridges. Two equivalents of the lithium compound gave a mixture of four main‐products, which could be identified as 2 , Li[Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al{CH(SiMe₃)₂}₃] ( 3 ), Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 4 ), and Al[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₃. The lithium atom of 3 is coordinated by the C≡C triple bond and an inner carbon atom of one bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl group. Further interactions were observed to C‐H bonds of methyl groups.     

Reactivity of Cationic Agostic and Carbene Structures Derived from Platinum(II) Metallacycles

This paper describes the formation of new platinacyclic complexes derived from the phosphine ligands PiPr₂Xyl, PMeXyl₂, and PMe₂Ar (Xyl=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ and Ar=2,6‐(2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃)₂‐C₆H₃) as well as reactivity studies of the trans‐[Pt(C^P)₂] bis‐metallacyclic complex 1 a derived from PiPr₂Xyl. Protonation of compound 1 a with [H(OEt₂)₂][BAr_F] (BAr_F=B[3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₄) forms a cationic δ‐agostic structure 4 a , whereas α‐hydride abstraction employing [Ph₃C][PF₆] produces a cationic platinum carbene trans‐[Pt{PiPr₂(2,6‐CH(Me)C₆H₃}{PiPr₂(2,6‐CH₂(Me)C₆H₃}][PF₆] ( 8 ). Compounds 4 a and 8 react with H₂ to yield the same 1:3 equilibrium mixture of 4 a and trans‐[PtH(PiPr₂Xyl)₂][BAr_F] ( 6 ), in which one of the phosphine ligands participates in a δ‐agostic interaction. DFT calculations reveal that H₂ activation by 8 occurs at the highly electrophilic alkylidene terminus with no participation of the metal. The two compounds 4 a and 8 experience C–C coupling reactions of a different nature. Thus, 4 a gives rise to complex trans‐[PtH{(E)‐1,2‐bis(2‐(PiPr₂)‐3‐MeC₆H₃)CH?CH}] ( 7 ) that contains a tridentate diphosphine–alkene ligand, through agostic C?H oxidative cleavage and C–C reductive coupling steps, whereas the C–C coupling reaction in 8 involves classical migratory insertion of its [Pt?CH] and [Pt?CH₂] bonds promoted by platinum coordination of CO or CNXyl. The mechanisms of the C?C bond‐forming reactions have also been investigated by computational methods.     

Reduction vs. Addition: The Reaction of an Aluminyl Anion with 1,3,5,7‐Cyclooctatetraene

The potassium aluminyl complex K[Al(NON^Ar)] (NON=NON^Ar=[O(SiMe₂NAr)₂]^2?, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) reacts with 1,3,5,7‐cyclooctatetraene (COT) to give K[Al(NON^Ar)(COT)]. The COT‐ligand is present in the asymmetric unit as a planar μ₂‐η²:η⁸‐bridge between Al and K, with additional K???π‐aryl interactions to neighboring molecules that generate a helical chain. DFT calculations indicate significant aromatic character, consistent with reduction to [COT]^2?. Addition of 18‐crown‐6 causes a rearrangement of the C₈‐carbocycle to form the isomeric 9‐aluminabicyclo[4.2.1]nona‐2,4,7‐triene anion.     

Micron‐granula polyolefin with self‐immobilized nickel and iron diimine catalysts bearing one or two allyl groups

Self‐immobilized nickel and iron diimine catalysts bearing one or two allyl groups of [ArN?C]₂(C₁₀H₆)NiBr₂ [Ar = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₂] ( 1 ), [ArN?C(Me)][Ar′N? C(Me)]C₅H₃NFeCl₂ [Ar = Ar′ = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃, Ar = 2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃, and Ar′ = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃] were synthesized and characterized. All three catalysts were investigated for olefin polymerization. As a result, these catalysts not only showed high activities as the catalyst free from the allyl group, such as [ArN?C]₂C₁₀H₆NiBr₂ (Ar = 2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₂)], but also greatly improved the morphology of polymer particles to afford micron‐granula polyolefin. The self‐immobilization of catalysts, the formation mechanism of microspherical polymer, and the influence on the size of the particles are discussed. The molecular structure of self‐immobilized nickel catalyst 1 was also characterized by crystallographic analysis. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 1018–1024, 2004     

SiSi Double Bonds: Synthesis of an NHC‐Stabilized Disilavinylidene

An efficient two‐step synthesis of the first NHC‐stabilized disilavinylidene (Z)‐(SIdipp)SiSi(Br)Tbb ( 2 ; SIdipp=C[N(C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)CH₂]₂, Tbb=C₆H₂‐2,6‐[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂‐4‐tBu, NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene) is reported. The first step of the procedure involved a 2:1 reaction of SiBr₂(SIdipp) with the 1,2‐dibromodisilene (E)‐Tbb(Br)SiSi(Br)Tbb at 100 °C, which afforded selectively an unprecedented NHC‐stabilized bromo(silyl)silylene, namely SiBr(SiBr₂Tbb)(SIdipp) ( 1 ). Alternatively, compound 1 could be obtained from the 2:1 reaction of SiBr₂(SIdipp) with LiTbb at low temperature. 1 was then selectively reduced with C₈K to give the NHC‐stabilized disilavinylidene 2 . Both low‐valent silicon compounds were comprehensively characterized by X‐ray diffraction analysis, multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analyses. Additionally, the electronic structure of 2 was studied by various quantum‐chemical methods.     

β-Diketiminato Rare-Earth Metal Complexes: The Influence of Monoatomic Substituents in the N-aryl Moieties on Structures and Properties

Treatment of β-diketiminate ligands bearing different N-aryl monoatomic substituents [HL^H = (C₆H₅)N = C(Me)CH=C(Me)NH(C₆H₅), HL^F = (2,6-F₂C₆H₃)N=C(Me)CH=C(Me)NH(2,6-F₂C₆H₃), and HL^Cl = (2,6-Cl₂C₆H₃)N=C(Me)CH=C(Me)NH(2,6-Cl₂C₆H₃)] with Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ (Ln = Y and Lu) afforded a variety of β-diketiminato rare-earth metal complexes depending on substituents, namely, phenyl ring C–H bond activated complexes (L')(L^H)Lu(THF) ( 1b , L' = (C₆H₄)N = C(Me)CH=C(Me)N(C₆H₅)), six-coordinate homoleptic complexes (L^H)₃Ln [Ln = Y ( 1aa ), Lu ( 1bb )], five-coordinate monoalkyl complexes (L^F)₂Ln(CH₂SiMe₃) [Ln = Y ( 2a ), Lu ( 2b )], and four-coordinate dialkyl complexes (L^Cl)Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₂ [Ln = Y ( 3a ), Lu ( 3b )]. All these complexes were characterized with NMR spectroscopy, and lutetium complexes 1b , 1bb and 3b were structurally validated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Moreover, dialkyl complexes 3 promoted the polymerization of 2-vinylpyridine (2-VP) to produce atactic poly(2-vinylpyridine) (P2VP) with quantitative yield. On activation with an equimolar amount of [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄], complexes 3 afforded highly isotactic P2VP with an mm value up to 94 %. Both ¹H NMR spectrum and MALDI-TOF mass analysis of an oligomer indicate that the polymerization was initiated by coordination insertion of 2-VP into the Y-CH₂SiMe₃ bond.     

Amidinate bromogermylene resulting from carbodiimide insertion into Ar–GeBr bond

The reaction of diaryldibromodigermene Tbb(Be)Ge = Ge(Br)Tbb (Tbb = 4-Bu^t-2,6-[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂C₆H₂) with N,N'-diisopropyl-carbodiimide afforded the corresponding amidinato-supported bromogermylene via the insertion of the C=N moiety into the Ge–C(Tbb) sss-bond. The formation mechanism of the amidinato-supported bromogermylene was revealed by DFT calculations. This type of insertion reaction toward a metal–carbon bond can be interpreted in analogy to the reactivity of transition-metal complexes.     

Boosting Low‐Valent Aluminum(I) Reactivity with a Potassium Reagent

The reagent RK [R=CH(SiMe₃)₂ or N(SiMe₃)₂] was expected to react with the low‐valent (^DIPPBDI)Al (^DIPPBDI=HC[C(Me)N(DIPP)]₂, DIPP=2,6‐iPr‐phenyl) to give [(^DIPPBDI)AlR]^?K⁺. However, deprotonation of the Me group in the ligand backbone was observed and [H₂C=C(N‐DIPP)?C(H)=C(Me)?N?DIPP]Al^?K⁺ ( 1 ) crystallized as a bright‐yellow product (73 %). Like most anionic Al^I complexes, 1 forms a dimer in which formally negatively charged Al centers are bridged by K⁺ ions, showing strong K⁺???DIPP interactions. The rather short Al–K bonds [3.499(1)–3.588(1) Å] indicate tight bonding of the dimer. According to DOSY NMR analysis, 1 is dimeric in C₆H₆ and monomeric in THF, but slowly reacts with both solvents. In reaction with C₆H₆, two C?H bond activations are observed and a product with a para‐phenylene moiety was exclusively isolated. DFT calculations confirm that the Al center in 1 is more reactive than that in (^DIPPBDI)Al. Calculations show that both Al^I and K⁺ work in concert and determines the reactivity of 1 .     

Substituted Ferrocenylboranes – Potential Ligand Precursors for ansa‐ Metallocenes,Constrained Geometry Complexes and ansa‐Diamido Complexes

A wide range of potential ligand precursors and related compounds have been synthesized from ferrocenyldibromoborane and ferrocenylenebis(dibromoborane) via salt elimination reactions. These comprise ligand precursors suitable for the preparation of (i) ansa‐metallocenes such as [FcB(η¹‐C₅H₅)₂] ( 2 ), [FcB(1‐C₉H₇)₂] ( 3 ), [FcB(3‐C₉H₇)₂] ( 4 ) and [1,1′‐fc{B(3‐C₉H₇)₂}₂] ( 11 ), (ii) constrained geometry complexes such as [FcB(1‐C₉H₇)N(H)Ph] ( 7 ) and [FcB(3‐C₉H₇)N(H)Ph] ( 8 ), (iii) ansa‐diamido complexes such as [FcB(N(H)Ph)₂] ( 9 ) as well as (iv) the related compounds [FcB(Br)N(H)tBu] ( 5 ), [FcB(Br)N(H)Ph] ( 6 ), [1,1′‐fc{B(Br)N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] ( 12 ) and [1,1′‐fc{B(Br)NiPr₂}₂] ( 13 ) (Fc = ferrocenyl, fc = ferrocenylene, C₅H₅ = cyclopentadienyl, C₉H₇ = indenyl). All new compounds have been characterised by multinuclear NMR spectroscopic techniques and in the case of 7 and 12 by X‐ray diffraction methods.     

Lewis Base Assisted Magnesium Complexes Incorporating Pyrrolyl and Ketiminate Ligands: Synthesis,Structural Diversity and Characterization

A series of four, five and six‐coordinated magnesium derivatives integrating with substituted pyrrole and ketimine ligands are conveniently synthesized. Reaction of two equiv of 2‐dimethylaminomethyl pyrrole with Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in THF affords the monomeric magnesium complex Mg[C₄H₃N(2‐CH₂NMe₂)]₂ (THF)₂ ( 1 ) in high yield along with elimination of two equiv of HN(SiMe₃)₂. Similarly, the reaction between two equiv of 2‐t‐butylaminomethyl pyrrole and Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in THF renders the magnesium derivative, Mg[C₄H₃N(2‐CH₂NH^tBu)]₂(THF)2₂( 2 ) in good yield. Interestingly, reaction between two equiv of 2‐t‐butylaminomethyl pyrrole and Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in toluene, instead of THF, generates Mg[C₄H₃N(2‐CH2NH^tBu)]₂ ( 3 ), also in high yield. Furthermore, the assembly of two equiv of ketimine ligand, HOCMeCHCMeNAr (Ar = C₆H₃‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂) and Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂, yields five‐coordinated magnesium derivatives, Mg(OCMeCHCMeNAr)₂(THF) ( 4 ) and Mg(OCMeCHCMeNAr)₂(OEt₂) ( 5 ), using THF and diethyl ether, respectively. All the aforementioned derivatives are characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy as well as 1 , 3 , 4 and 5 are subjected to X‐ray diffraction analysis in solid state.     

Interconversion of Metallabenzenes and Cyclic η2‐Allene‐Coordinated Complexes

Treatment of the osmabenzene [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH} Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 1 ) with excess 8‐hydroxyquinoline produces monosubstituted osmabenzene [Os{CH C(PPh₃) CHC(PPh₃)CH}(C₉H₆NO)Cl(PPh₃)]Cl ( 2 ) or disubstituted osmabenzene [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH} (C₉H₆NO)₂]Cl ( 3 ) under different reaction conditions. Osmabenzene 2 evolves into cyclic η²‐allene‐coordinated complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH=(η²‐C?CH₂)}(C₉H₆NO)(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 4 ) in the presence of excess PPh₃ and NaOH, presumably involving a P? C bond cleavage of the metallacycle. Reaction of 4 with excess 8‐hydroxyquinoline under air affords the S_NAr product [(C₉H₆NO)Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHCHC} (C₉H₆NO)(PPh₃)]Cl ( 5 ). Complex 4 is fairly reactive to a nucleophile in the presence of acid, which could react with water to give carbonyl complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?CH₂}(C₉H₆NO) (CO)(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 6 ). Complex 4 also reacts with PPh₃ in the presence of acid and results in a transformation to [Os {CHC(PPh₃)CHCHC}(C₉H₆NO)Cl (PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 7 ) and [Os{CH?C(PPh₃) CH=(η²‐C?CH(PPh₃))}(C₉H₆NO) Cl(PPh₃)]Cl ( 8 ). Further investigation shows that the ratio of 7 and 8 is highly dependent on the amount of the acid in the reaction.     

1‐Azaallyl Complexes of NiII,PdII, and TiIII

The metal complexes [Ni{N(Ar)C(R)C(H)Ph}₂) ( 2 ) (Ar = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, R = SiMe₃), [Ti(Cp₂){N(R)C(Bu^t)C(H)R}] ( 3 ), M{N(R)C(Bu^t)C(H)R}I [M = Ni ( 4 a ) or Pd ( 4 b )] and [M{N(R)C(Bu^t)C(H)R}I(PPh₃)] [M = Ni ( 5 a ) or Pd ( 5 b )] have been prepared from a suitable metal halide and lithium precursor of ( 2 ) or ( 3 ) or, alternatively from [M(LL)₂] (M = Ni, LL = cod; M = Pd, LL = dba) and the ketimine RN = C(Bu^t)CH(I)R ( 1 ). All compounds, except 4 were fully characterised, including the provision of X‐ray crystallographic data for complex 5 a .     

Metal—azo and metal—imine compounds : IV. Chemical properties of cyclometallated compounds

The reactions of some cyclometallated azo and imino compounds have been studied. Treatment of [IrHX(PhCCHCHNC₃H₇)(PCy₃)₂] with X₂ (X = Cl, Br) yields substitution products [IrHX(PhCCXCHNC₃H₇)(PCy₃)₂] without rupture of the IrC bond. Treatment of [IrHCl(5-CH₃ · C₆H₃CHNCH₃) (PPh₃)₂] with AgClO₄ and then with CNC₆H₁₁ or CO (= L) leads to the formation of the complexes [IrHL(5-CH₃ · C₆H₃CHNCH₃)(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄, the metallocyclic ring remaining intact. Rupture of the metallocyclic ring is observed when [PdCl(C₆H₄NNPh)]₂ is treated under mild conditions with CNC₆H₁₁, and the insertion product [PdCl(CNC₆H₁₁)₂ {(CNC₆H₁₁)₂C₆H₄NNPh} ] is obtained.Possible mechanisms for the reactions are discussed.