Charge Transport through Self‐Assembled Monolayers of Monoterpenoids

The nature of the processes at the origin of life that selected specific classes of molecules for broad incorporation into cells is controversial. Among those classes selected were polyisoprenoids and their derivatives. This paper tests the hypothesis that polyisoprenoids were early contributors to membranes in part because they (or their derivatives) could facilitate charge transport by quantum tunneling. It measures charge transport across self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) of carboxyl‐terminated monoterpenoids (O₂C(C₉HX)) and alkanoates (O₂C(C₇HX)) with different degrees of unsaturation, supported on silver (Ag^TS) bottom electrodes, with Ga₂O₃/EGaIn top electrodes. Measurements of current density of SAMs of linear length‐matched hydrocarbons—both saturated and unsaturated—show that completely unsaturated molecules transport charge faster than those that are completely saturated by approximately a factor of ten. This increase in relative rates of charge transport correlates with the number of carbon–carbon double bonds, but not with the extent of conjugation. These results suggest that polyisoprenoids—even fully unsaturated—are not sufficiently good tunneling conductors for their conductivity to have favored them as building blocks in the prebiotic world.     

Charge Tunneling along Short Oligoglycine Chains

This work examines charge transport (CT) through self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) of oligoglycines having an N‐terminal cysteine group that anchors the molecule to a gold substrate, and demonstrate that CT is rapid (relative to SAMs of n‐alkanethiolates). Comparisons of rates of charge transport‐using junctions with the structure Au^TS/SAM//Ga₂O₃/EGaIn (across these SAMs of oligoglycines, and across SAMs of a number of structurally and electronically related molecules) established that rates of charge tunneling along SAMs of oligoglycines are comparable to that along SAMs of oligophenyl groups (of comparable length). The mechanism of tunneling in oligoglycines is compatible with superexchange, and involves interactions among high‐energy occupied orbitals in multiple, consecutive amide bonds, which may by separated by one to three methylene groups. This mechanistic conclusion is supported by density functional theory (DFT).     

Anion‐directed Silver(I) Coordination Assemblies Based on 1‐(2‐Pyridyl)‐2‐(4‐pyridyl)‐1,2,4‐triazolewith Diverse Supramolecular Networks and Dichromate Removal Capabilities

A series of silver(I) supramolecular complexes, namely, {[Ag(L²⁴)](NO₃)}_n ( 1 ), [Ag₂(L²⁴)(NO₂)₂]_n ( 2 ), and {[Ag_1.25(L²⁴)(DMF)](PF₆)_1.25}_n ( 3 ) were prepared by the reactions of 1‐(2‐pyridyl)‐2‐(4‐pyridyl)‐1,2,4‐triazole (L²⁴) and silver(I) salts with different anions (AgNO₃, AgNO₂, AgPF₆). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction indicates that 1 – 3 display diverse supramolecular networks. The structure of dinuclear complex 1 is composed of a six‐membered Ag₂N₄ ring with the Ag ··· Ag distance of 4.4137(3) Å. In complex 2 , the adjacent Ag^I centers are interlinked by L²⁴ ligands into a 1D chain, the adjacent of which are further extended by the bridged nitrites to construct a 2D coordination architecture. Complex 3 shows a 3D (3,4)‐connected framework, which is generated by the linkage of L²⁴ ligands. All complexes were characterized by IR spectra, elemental analysis, and powder X‐ray diffraction. Notably, a structural comparison of the complexes demonstrates that their structures are predominated by the nature of anions. Additionally, 1 and 2 show efficient dichromate (Cr₂O₇^2–) capture in water system, which can be ascribed to the anion‐exchange.     

catena‐Poly[[silver(I)‐μ‐[9,10‐bis(1H‐benzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)anthracene]‐κ2N3:N3′] bis(nitrato‐κO)silver(I)]

Yellow needle‐shaped crystals of the title compound, {[Ag(C₃₀H₂₂N₄)][Ag(NO₃)₂]}_n, were obtained by the reaction of AgNO₃ and 9,10‐bis(benzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)anthracene (L) in a 2:1 ratio. The asymmetric unit consists of two Ag^I cations, one half L ligand and one nitrate anion. One Ag^I cation occupies a crystallographic inversion centre and links two N‐atom donors of two distinct L ligands to form an infinite one‐dimensional coordination polymer. The second Ag^I cation lies on a crystallographic twofold axis and is coordinated by two O‐atom donors of two nitrate anions to form an [Ag(NO₃)₂]⁻ counter‐ion. The polymeric chains are linked into a supramolecular framework via weak Ag...O [3.124 (5) Å] and Ag...π (2.982 Å) interactions (π is the centroid of an outer anthracene benzene ring). The π interactions contain two short Ag...C contacts [2.727 (6) and 2.765 (6) Å], which can be considered to define Ag–η²‐anthracene bonding interactions. In comparison with a previously reported binuclear Ag^I complex [Du, Hu, Zhang, Zeng & Bu (2008). CrystEngComm, 10 , 1866–1874], this new one‐dimensional coordination polymer was obtained by changing the metal–ligand ratio during the synthesis.     

5‐n‐Butylpyridine‐2‐carboxylate–copper(II) and –iron(III) complexes

In trans‐bis(5‐n‐butyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­bis­(methanol‐κO)copper(II), [Cu(C₁₀H₁₂NO₂)₂(CH₄O)₂], the Cu atom lies on a centre of symmetry and has a distorted octahedral coordination. The Cu—O(methanol) bond length in the axial direction is 2.596 (3) Å, which is much longer than the Cu—­O(carboxylate) and Cu—N distances in the equatorial plane [1.952 (2) and 1.977 (2) Å, respectively]. In mer‐tris(5‐n‐bu­tyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­iron(III), [Fe(C₁₀H₁₂NO₂)₃], the Fe atom also has a distorted octahedral geometry, with Fe—O and Fe—N bond‐length ranges of 1.949 (4)–1.970 (4) and 2.116 (5)–2.161 (5) Å, respectively. Both crystals are stabilized by stacking interactions of the 5‐n‐butyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ate ligand, although hydrogen bonds also contribute to the stabilization of the copper(II) complex.     

catena‐Poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)­silver(I)]‐μ‐nicotinato] and catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato]

In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐nico­tinato‐κ²N:O], [Ag(C₆H₄NO₂)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom is tetracoordinated by two N atoms from the di‐2‐pyridyl­amine (BPA) ligand [Ag—N = 2.3785 (18) and 2.3298 (18) Å] and by one N atom and one carboxyl­ate O atom from nicotinate ligands [Ag—N = 2.2827 (15) Å and Ag—O = 2.3636 (14) Å]. Bridging by nicotinate N and O atoms generates a polymeric chain structure, which extends along [100]. The carboxyl O atom not bonded to the Ag atom takes part in an intrachain C—H⋯O hydrogen bond, further stabilizing the chain. Pairs of chains are linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to generate ribbons. There are no π–π interactions in this complex. In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato‐κ²O¹:O²], [Ag(C₇H₅O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom has a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with three strong bonds to two pyridine N atoms from the BPA ligand [Ag—N = 2.286 (5) and 2.320 (5) Å] and to one carboxyl­ate O atom from the 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligand [Ag—O = 2.222 (4) Å]; the fourth, weaker, Ag‐atom coordination is to one of the phenol O atoms [Ag⋯O = 2.703 (4) Å] of an adjacent moiety, and this interaction generates a polymeric chain along [100]. Pairs of chains are linked about inversion centers by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form ribbons, within which there are π–π interactions. The ribbons are linked about inversion centers by pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and additional π–π interactions between inversion‐related pairs of 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligands to generate a three‐dimensional network.     

Poly[μ2‐(N‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐carboxamidine)‐μ2‐nitrato‐silver(I)]

In the title complex, [Ag(NO₃)(C₆H₇N₃O)]_n or [Ag(NO₃)(pyaoxH₂)] (pyaoxH₂ is N‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐carboxamidine), the Ag⁺ ion is bridged by the pyaoxH₂ ligands and nitrate anions, giving rise to a two‐dimensional molecular structure. Each pyaoxH₂ ligand coordinates to two Ag⁺ ions using its pyridyl and carboxamidine N atoms, and the OH and the NH₂ groups are uncoordinated. Each nitrate anion uses two O atoms to coordinate to two Ag⁺ ions. The Ag...Ag separation via the pyaoxH₂ bridge is 2.869 (1) Å, markedly shorter than that of 6.452 (1) Åvia the nitrate bridge. The two‐dimensional structure is fishscale‐like, and can be described as pyaoxH₂‐bridged Ag₂ nodes that are further linked by nitrate anions. Hydrogen bonding between the amidine groups and the nitrate O atoms connects adjacent layers into a three‐dimensional network.     

Silver(I) sulfate coordination polymers with 4,4′‐bipyridazine and pyridazino[4,5‐d]pyridazine

Poly[[μ₄‐4,4′‐bipyridazine‐μ₅‐sulfato‐disilver(I)] monohydrate], {[Ag₂(SO₄)(C₈H₆N₄)]·H₂O}_n, (I), and poly[[aqua‐μ₄‐pyridazino[4,5‐d]pyridazine‐μ₃‐sulfato‐disilver(I)] monohydrate], {[Ag₂(SO₄)(C₆H₄N₄)(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n, (II), possess three‐ and two‐dimensional polymeric structures, respectively, supported by N‐tetradentate coordination of the organic ligands [Ag—N = 2.208 (3)–2.384 (3) Å] and O‐pentadentate coordination of the sulfate anions [Ag—O = 2.284 (3)–2.700 (2) Å]. Compound (I) is the first structurally examined complex of the new ligand 4,4′‐bipyridazine; it is based upon unprecedented centrosymmetric silver–pyridazine tetramers with tetrahedral AgN₂O₂ and trigonal–bipyramidal AgN₂O₃ coordination of two independent Ag^I ions. Compound (II) adopts a typical dimeric silver–pyridazine motif incorporating two kinds of square‐pyramidal AgN₂O₃ Ag^I ions. The structure exhibits short anion–π interactions involving noncoordinated sulfate O atoms [O...π = 3.041 (3) Å].     

Time‐Resolved Assembly of Cluster‐in‐Cluster {Ag12}‐in‐{W76} Polyoxometalates under Supramolecular Control

We report the time‐resolved supramolecular assembly of a series of nanoscale polyoxometalate clusters (from the same one‐pot reaction) of the form: [H_(10+m)Ag₁₈Cl(Te₃W₃₈O₁₃₄)₂]_n, where n=1 and m=0 for compound 1 (after 4 days), n=2 and m=3 for compound 2 (after 10 days), and n=∞ and m=5 for compound 3 (after 14 days). The reaction is based upon the self‐organization of two {Te₃W₃₈} units around a single chloride template and the formation of a {Ag₁₂} cluster, giving a {Ag₁₂}‐in‐{W₇₆} cluster‐in‐cluster in compound 1 , which further aggregates to cluster compounds 2 and 3 by supramolecular Ag‐POM interactions. The proposed mechanism for the formation of the clusters has been studied by ESI‐MS. Further, control experiments demonstrate the crucial role that TeO₃^2?, Cl^?, and Ag⁺ play in the self‐assembly of compounds 1 – 3 .     

Poly[[diaquabis[μ2‐2‐(4‐pyridinio)propane‐1,3‐dionato‐κ2O:O′]cobalt(II)] dinitrate]

The title compound, {[Co(C₈H₇NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂](NO₃)₂}_n, is the first d‐metal ion complex involving bidentate bridging of a β‐dialdehyde group. The Co²⁺ ion is situated on an inversion centre and adopts an octahedral coordination with four equatorial aldehyde O atoms [Co—O = 2.0910 (14) and 2.1083 (14) Å] and two axial aqua ligands [Co—O = 2.0631 (13) Å]. The title compound has a two‐dimensional square‐grid framework structure supported by propane‐1,3‐dionate O:O′‐bridges between the metal ions. The organic ligand itself possesses a zwitterionic structure, involving conjugated anionic propane‐1,3‐dionate and cationic pyridinium fragments. Hydrogen bonding between coordinated water molecules, the pyridinium NH group and the nitrate anions [O...O = 2.749 (2) and 2.766 (3) Å, and N...O = 2.864 (3) Å] is essential for the crystal packing.     

Polymeric (3‐amino‐2‐chloropyridine)nitratosilver(I)

In the title compound {alternative name: poly­[silver(I)‐μ‐(3‐­amino‐2‐chloro­pyridine)‐μ‐nitr­ato]}, [Ag(NO₃)(C₅H₅ClN₂)]_n the Ag^I atom is in an irregular AgN₂O₃ geometry, surrounded by one pyridyl N atom [Ag—N 2.283 (5) Å], one amine N atom [Ag—N 2.364 (6) Å] and three O atoms from different nitrate ions [Ag—O 2.510 (6)–2.707 (6) Å]. The Ag ions are bridged by the 3‐amino‐2‐chloro­pyridine ligands into helical chains. Adjacent uniform chiral chains are further interlinked through the NO₃ bridges into an interesting two‐dimensional coordination network in the solid.     

Silver(I) complexes of 2‐(2‐amino­eth­yl)pyridine: nitrate and perchlorate salts of bis­[μ‐2‐(2‐amino­eth­yl)pyridine‐κ2N:N′]disilver(I)

2‐(2‐Amino­eth­yl)pyridine (2‐aep, C₇H₁₀N₂) acts as a bridging ligand in bis­[μ‐2‐(2‐amino­eth­yl)pyridine‐κ²N:N′]disilver(I) dinitrate, [Ag₂(2‐aep)₂](NO₃)₂, and bis­[μ‐2‐(2‐amino­eth­yl)­pyridine‐κ²N:N′]disilver(I) diperchlorate, [Ag₂(2‐aep)₂](ClO₄)₂. Both salts contain the dinuclear [Ag₂(2‐aep)₂]²⁺ cation, which possesses a crystallographic inversion center. The Ag⋯Ag distance is 3.1163 (5) Å for the nitrate and 3.0923 (3) Å for the perchlorate salt, and may indicate a weak d¹⁰–d¹⁰ inter­action in each case. Essentially linear coordination of the Ag^I atom is perturbed by weak coordination to the anionic O atoms. These latter inter­actions organize the dinuclear cations into one‐dimensional polymeric chains in the crystals of the two salts.     

Tetra­kis(μ2‐1,8‐naphthyridine)‐1:2κ4N:N′;3:4κ4N:N′‐bis­(μ2‐salicylato)‐1:4κ2O:O′;2:3κ2O:O′‐tetrakis­(salicylic acid)‐1κO,2κO,3κO,4κO‐tetra­silver(I)(4 Ag—Ag)

The title complex, [Ag₄(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₈H₆N₂)₄(C₇H₆O₃)₄], lies about an inversion centre and has a unique tetra­nuclear structure consisting of four Ag^I atoms bridged by four N atoms from two 1,8‐naphthyridine (napy) ligands to form an N:N′‐bridge and four O atoms from two salicylate (SA) ligands to form an O:O′‐bridge. The Ag atoms have distorted octa­hedral coordination geometry. The centrosymmetric Ag₄ ring has Ag—Ag separations of 2.772 (2) and 3.127 (2) Å, and Ag—Ag—Ag angles of 107.70 (4) and 72.30 (4)°. All SA hydroxy groups take part in intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding. In the crystal packing, the napy rings are oriented parallel and overlap one another. These π–π inter­actions, together with weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O contacts, stabilize the crystal structure.     

A one‐dimensional silver(I) coordination polymer based on an asymmetric flexible N‐donor carboxylate ligand: catena‐poly[(μ3‐4‐{[(1‐phenyl‐1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)sulfanyl]methyl}benzoato‐κ3O:O′:N4)silver(I)]

The title compound, [Ag(C₁₅H₁₁N₄O₂S)]_n, was synthesized by the reaction of 4‐{[(1‐phenyl‐1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)sulfanyl]methyl}benzoic acid (Hptmba) with silver nitrate and triethylamine at room temperature. The asymmetric unit contains one crystallographically independent Ag^I cation and one ptmba⁻ ligand. Each Ag^I cation is tricoordinated by two carboxylate O atoms and one tetrazole N atom from three different ptmba⁻ ligands, displaying a distorted T‐shaped geometry. Three Ag^I cations are linked by tris‐monodentate bridging ptmba⁻ ligands to form a one‐dimensional double chain along the c axis, which is further consolidated by an intrachain π–π contact with an offset face‐to‐face distance of 4.176 (3) Å between the centroids of two adjacent aromatic rings in neighbouring benzoate groups. The one‐dimensional chains are linked into a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework by additional π–π interchain interactions, viz. of 3.753 (3) Å between two phenyl substituents of the tetrazole rings and of 4.326 (2) Å between a benzoate ring and a tetrazole ring. Thermogravimetric analysis and the fluorescence spectrum of the title compound reveal its good thermal stability and a strong green luminescence at room temperature.     

Cobalt(II) and cadmium(II) square grids supported with 4,4′‐bipyrazole and accommodating 3‐carboxyadamantane‐1‐carboxylate

In poly[[bis(μ‐4,4′‐bi‐1H‐pyrazole‐κ²N²:N^2′)bis(3‐carboxyadamantane‐1‐carboxylato‐κO¹)cobalt(II)] dihydrate], {[Co(C₁₂H₁₅O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (I), the Co²⁺ cation lies on an inversion centre and the 4,4′‐bipyrazole (4,4′‐bpz) ligands are also situated across centres of inversion. In its non‐isomorphous cadmium analogue, {[Cd(C₁₂H₁₅O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (II), the Cd²⁺ cation lies on a twofold axis. In both compounds, the metal cations adopt an octahedral coordination, with four pyrazole N atoms in the equatorial plane [Co—N = 2.156 (2) and 2.162 (2) Å; Cd—N = 2.298 (2) and 2.321 (2) Å] and two axial carboxylate O atoms [Co—O = 2.1547 (18) Å and Cd—O = 2.347 (2) Å]. In both structures, interligand hydrogen bonding [N...O = 2.682 (3)–2.819 (3) Å] is essential for stabilization of the MN₄O₂ environment with its unusually high (for bulky adamantanecarboxylates) number of coordinated N‐donor co‐ligands. The compounds adopt two‐dimensional coordination connectivities and exist as square‐grid [M(4,4′‐bpz)₂]_n networks accommodating monodentate carboxylate ligands. The interlayer linkage is provided by hydrogen bonds from the carboxylic acid groups via the solvent water molecules [O...O = 2.565 (3) and 2.616 (3) Å] to the carboxylate groups in the next layer [O...O = 2.717 (3)–2.841 (3) Å], thereby extending the structures in the third dimension.     

catena‐Poly[[disilver(I)(Ag—Ag)‐bis[μ‐1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)diimidazole‐κ2N3:N3′]] bis(perchlorate)]: a double helix stabilized by ligand‐unsupported argentophilic interactions

The title compound, {[Ag₂(C₁₀H₁₄N₄)₂](ClO₄)₂}_n, is a one‐dimensional coordination polymer formed by Ag^I atoms linearly bridged by 1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)diimidazole molecules. The chains have a helical arrangement and pairs of chains are held together by the rarely reported ligand‐unsupported Ag—Ag interaction [2.966 (1) Å], which results in a double‐helix structure. The double helix contains twisted 24‐membered metallomacrocycles, which are composed of four Ag atoms and two ligands. The Ag atoms lie on twofold axes.     

Alkoholyse von [Fe2(OtBu)6] als einfacher Weg zu neuen Eisen(III)‐Alkoxo‐Verbindungen: Synthesen und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2(OtAmyl)6], [Fe5OCl(OiPr)12], [Fe5O(OiPr)13], [Fe5O(OiBu)13], [Fe5O(OCH2CF3)13], [Fe5O(OnPr)13] und [Fe9O3(OnPr)21] · iPrOH

Alcoholysis of [Fe₂(O^tBu)₆] as a Simple Route to New Iron(III)‐Alkoxo Compounds: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂(O^tAmyl)₆], [Fe₅OCl(OⁱPr)₁₂], [Fe₅O(OⁱPr)₁₃], [Fe₅O(OⁱBu)₁₃], [Fe₅O(OCH₂CF₃)₁₃], [Fe₅O(OⁿPr)₁₃], and [Fe₉O₃(OⁿPr)₂₁] · ⁿPrOH New alkoxo‐iron compounds can be synthesized easily by alcoholysis of [Fe₂(O^tBu)₆] ( 1 ). Due to different bulkyness of the alcohols used, three different structure types are formed: [Fe₂(OR)₆], [Fe₅O(OR)₁₃] and [Fe₉O₃(OR)₂₁] · ROH. We report synthesis and crystal structures of the compounds [Fe₅OCl(OⁱPr)₁₂] ( 2 ), [Fe₂(O^tAmyl)₆] ( 3 ), [Fe₅O(OⁱPr)₁₃] ( 4 ), [Fe₅O(OⁱBu)₁₃] ( 5 ), [Fe₅O(OCH₂CF₃)₁₃] ( 6 ), [Fe₉O₃(OⁿPr)₂₁] · ⁿPrOH ( 7 ) and [Fe₅O(OⁿPr)₁₃] ( 8 ). Crystallographic Data: 2 , tetragonal, P 4/n, a = 16.070(5) Å, c = 9.831(5) Å, V = 2539(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.360 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0636; 3 , monoclinic, P 2₁/c, a = 10.591(5) Å, b = 10.654(4) Å, c = 16.740(7) Å, β = 104.87(2)°, V = 1826(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.154 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0756; 4 , triclinic, , a = 20.640(3) Å, b = 21.383(3) Å, c = 21.537(3) Å, α = 82.37(1)°, β = 73.15(1)°, γ = 61.75(1)°, V = 8013(2) ų, Z = 6, d_c = 1.322 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0412; 5 , tetragonal, P 4cc, a = 13.612(5) Å, c = 36.853(5) Å, V = 6828(4) ų, Z = 4, d_c = 1.079 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0609; 6 , triclinic, , a = 12.039(2) Å, b = 12.673(3) Å, c = 19.600(4) Å, α = 93.60(1)°, β = 97.02(1)°, γ = 117.83(1)°, V = 2600(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 2.022 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0585; 7 , triclinic, , a = 12.989(3) Å, b = 16.750(4) Å, c = 21.644(5) Å, α = 84.69(1)°, β = 86.20(1)°, γ = 77.68(1)°, V = 4576(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.344 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0778; 8 , triclinic, , a = 12.597(5) Å, b = 12.764(5) Å, c = 16.727(7) Å, α = 91.94(1)°, β = 95.61(1)°, γ = 93.24(2)°, V = 2670(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.323 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0594.     

Complex Formation of 2, 6‐Bis‐(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)pyridine with AlIII,FeIII and CuII

Complex formation of 2, 6‐bis(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)pyridine (H₂Lⁱ) with Fe³⁺ and Cu²⁺ was investigated in a H₂O/DMSO medium (mole fraction x_DMSO = 0.2) by potentiometric and spectrophotometric methods. The pK_a values of [H₃Lⁱ]⁺ are 2.25, 10.51 and 14.0 (25 °C, 0.1 M KCl). The formation constants of [Fe^III(Lⁱ)]⁺ and [Cu^II(Lⁱ)] (25 °C, 0.1 M KCl) are log β₁ = 21.5 for Fe³⁺ and log β₁ = 18.5 for Cu²⁺. The crystal structures of [Al(Lⁱ)₂Na(EtOH)₃], [Fe(Lⁱ)₂Na(EtOH)₃], and [Cu(Lⁱ)(py)]₂ were investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses. The Fe^III and the Al^III compound are isotypic and crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. Al‐compound (215 K): a = 12.599(3) Å, b = 16.653(3) Å, c = 17.525(4) Å, β = 100.27(3)°, Z = 4 for C₄₀H₄₀AlN₂NaO₇; Fe‐compound (293 K): a = 12.753(3) Å, b = 16.715(3) Å, c = 17.493(3) Å, β = 99.68(3)°, Z = 4 for C₄₀H₄₀FeN₂NaO₇. Both compounds contain a homoleptic, anionic bis‐complex [M(Lⁱ)₂]^‐ of approximate D₂ symmetry. The Cu compound crystallized as an uncharged, dinuclear and centrosymmetric [Cu(Lⁱ)(py)]₂ complex in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with (293 K) a = 13.386(3) Å, b = 9.368(2) Å, c = 14.656(3) Å, β = 100.65(3)°, Z = 2 for C₄₄H₃₂Cu₂N₄O₄. The structural properties and in particular the possible influence of the ligand geometry on the stability of the metal complexes is discussed.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Physicochemical Studies of Hexakis(2,4‐dimethylanilinium) Cyclohexaphosphate Hexahydrate

Chemical preparation, crystal structure, thermal analysis, IR absorption, and NMR studies are given for a new organic cyclohexaphosphate, the hexakis(2,4‐dimethylanilinium) cyclohexaphosphate hexahydrate ((2,4‐Me₂C₆H₃NH₃)₆P₆O₁₈?6 H₂O). This compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, with cell parameters a=10.914(4) Å, b=11.198(3) Å, c=25.670(2) Å, β=95.05(4)°, Z=2, and V=3124(2) ų. Its crystal structure is determined and refined to a final R=0.054 for 4627 independent reflections. The atomic arrangement can be described as a layer organization built by P₆O₁₈‐ring anions and H₂O molecules. Between these layers are located the organic groups that form H‐bonds with O‐atoms of the P₆O₁₈ rings and H₂O molecules. Determination of the geometric characteristics of the H‐bonds show the existence in this structure of four particularly strong H‐bonding contacts (1.75, 1.76, 1.78, and 1.87 Å).     

Beiträge zur Kristallchemie und zum thermischen Verhalten von wasserfreien Phosphaten. XXXIII [1] In2P2O7, ein Indium(I)‐diphosphato‐indat(III) und In4(P2O7)3 — Darstellung,Kristallisation und Kristallstrukturen

Contributions on Crystal Chemistry and Thermal Behaviour of Anhydrous Phosphates. XXXIII [1] In₂P₂O₇ an Indium(I)‐diphosphatoindate(III), and In₄(P₂O₇)₃ — Synthesis, Crystallization, and Crystal Structure Solid state reactions via the gas phase lead to the new mixed‐valence indium(I, III)‐diphosphate In₂P₂O₇. Colourless single crystals of In₂P₂O₇ have been grown by isothermal heating of stoichiometric amounts of InPO₄ and InP (800 °C; 7d) using iodine as mineralizer. The structure of In₂P₂O₇ [P2₁/c, a = 7.550(1) Å, b = 10.412(1) Å, c = 8.461(2) Å, b = 105.82(1)°, 2813 independent reflections, 101 parameter, R1 = 0.031, wR2 = 0.078] is the first example for an In⁺ cation in pure oxygen coordination. Observed distances d(In^I‐O) are exceptionally long (d_min(In^I‐O) = 2.82 Å) and support assumption of mainly s‐character for the lone‐pair at the In⁺ ion. Single crystals of In₄(P₂O₇)₃ were grown by chemical vapour transport experiments in a temperature gradient (1000 → 900 °C) using P/I mixtures as transport agent. In contrast to the isostructural diphosphates M₄(P₂O₇)₃ (M = V, Cr, Fe) monoclinic instead of orthorhombic symmetry has been found for In₄(P₂O₇)₃ [P2₁/a, a = 13.248(3) Å, b = 9.758(1) Å, c = 13.442(2) Å, b = 108.94(1)°, 7221 independent reflexes, 281 parameter, R1 = 0.027, wR2 = 0.067].