Photochemische Reaktionen von Cyclopentadienylbis(ethen)rhodium mit Benzolderivaten

Photochemical Reactions of Cyclopentadienylbis(ethene)rhodium with Benzene Derivatives During UV irradiation of [CpRh(C₂H₄)₂] ( 1 ) (Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅) in hexane in the presence of hexamethylbenzene the di‐ and trinuclear arene bridged complexes [(CpRh)₂(μ‐η³ : η³‐C₆Me₆)] ( 3 ) and [(CpRh)₃(μ₃‐η² : η² : η²‐C₆Me₆)] ( 4 ) are formed besides known [CpRh(η⁴‐C₆Me₆)] ( 2 ). It was shown by a separate experiment that 3 besides small amounts of 4 is formed by attack of photochemically from 1 arising CpRh fragments at the free double bond of the η⁴‐bonded benzene ring in 2 . Irradiation of 1 in the presence of diphenyl (C₁₂H₁₀) affords the compounds [(CpRh)₂(μ‐η³ : η³‐C₁₂H₁₀)] ( 5 ) and [(CpRh)₃(μ₃‐η² : η² : η²‐C₁₂H₁₀)] ( 6 ) as analogues of 3 and 4 , in the presence of triptycene (C₂₀H₁₄) only [(CpRh)₂(μ‐η³ : η³‐C₂₀H₁₄)] ( 7 ) is obtained; the bridging in 5 , 6 , and 7 always occurs via the same six‐membered ring of the corresponding ligand system. During the photochemical reaction of 1 in the presence of styrene (C₈H₈) substitution of the ethene ligands by the vinyl groups with formation of [CpRh(C₂H₄)(η²‐C₈H₈)] ( 8 ) and known [CpRh(η²‐C₈H₈)₂] ( 9 ) is observed exclusively. The new complexes were characterized analytically and spectroscopically, in the case of 3 also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

Self-assembly of tetrareduced corannulene with mixed Li–Rb clusters: dynamic transformations,unique structures and record 7Li NMR shifts

Self-assembly processes of the highly reduced bowl-shaped corannulene generated by the chemical reduction with a binary combination of alkali metals, namely Li–Rb, have been investigated by variable-temperature ¹H and ⁷Li NMR spectroscopy. The formation of several unique mixed metal sandwich products based on tetrareduced corannulene, C₂₀H₁₀ ^4– (1 ^4–), has been revealed followed by investigation of their dynamic transformations in solutions. Analysis of NMR data allowed to propose the mechanism of stepwise alkali metal substitution as well as to identify experimental conditions for the isolation of intermediate and final supramolecular products. As a result, two new triple-decker aggregates with a mixed Li–Rb core, [{Rb(THF)₂}₂]//[Li₃Rb₂(C₂₀H₁₀)₂{Li⁺(THF)}] (2) and [{Rb(diglyme)}₂]//[Li₃Rb₃(C₂₀H₁₀)₂(diglyme)₂]·0.5THF (3·0.5THF), have been crystallized and structurally characterized. The Li₃Rb₂-product has an open coordination site at the sandwich periphery and thus is considered transient on the way to the Li₃Rb₃-sandwich having the maximized intercalated alkali metal content. Next, the formation of the LiRb₅ self-assembly with 1 ^4– has been identified by ⁷Li NMR as the final step in a series of dynamic transformations in this system. This product was also isolated and crystallographically characterized to confirm the LiRb₅ core. Notably, all sandwiches have their central cavities, located in between the hub-sites of two C₂₀H₁₀ ^4– decks, occupied by an internal Li⁺ ion which exhibits the record high negative shift (ranging from –21 to –25 ppm) in ⁷Li NMR spectra. The isolation of three novel aggregates having different Li–Rb core compositions allowed us to look into the origin of the unusual ⁷Li NMR shifts at the molecular level. The discussion of formation mechanisms, dynamic transformations as well as unique electronic structures of these remarkable mixed alkali metal organometallic self-assemblies is provided and supported by DFT calculations.     

Synthese verbrückter binuklearer Titanocenverbindungen – Kristallstruktur von Cl2Ti[(C5H4)(C5H4)(Me)Si–Si(Me)(C5H4)(C5H4)]TiCl2 · PhMe

Synthesis of Bridged Binuclear Titanocene Compounds – Crystal Structure of Cl₂Ti[(C₅H₄)(C₅H₄)(Me)Si–Si(Me)(C₅H₄)(C₅H₄)]TiCl₂ · PhMe Starting from Cp₂(Me)Si–Si(Me)Cp₂ 1 the complexes X₂Ti[(C₅H₄)(C₅H₄)(Me)Si–Si(Me)(C₅H₄)(C₅H₄)]TiX₂ (X = Cl ( 2 a ); X = Me ( 3 )) were synthesized. The compounds were characterized by means of their ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐n.m.r. and MS‐spectra. The crystal structure of 2 a · PhMe was determined.     

Two coordination polymers constructed by 5‐[(4‐carboxyphenoxy)methyl]benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylic acid and 2,2′‐bipyridine: syntheses,structures and luminescence properties

Coordination polymers (CPs) have attracted increasing interest in recent years. In this work, two new CPs, namely poly[[aquabis(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′){μ₃‐5‐[(4‐carboxylatophenoxy)methyl]benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O³:O⁵}(μ‐formato‐κ³O:O,O′)dicadmium(II)] monohydrate], {[Cd₂(C₁₆H₉O₇)(HCO₂)(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n ( 1 ), and poly[[(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′){μ₃‐5‐[(4‐carboxylphenoxy)methyl]benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O³:O⁵}manganese(II)] sesquihydrate], {[Mn(C₁₆H₁₀O₇)(C₁₀H₈N₂)]·1.5H₂O}_n ( 2 ), have been prepared using the tricarboxylic acid 5‐[(4‐carboxyphenoxy)methyl]benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylic acid and 2,2′‐bipyridine under hydrothermal conditions. CP 1 displays a two‐dimensional layer structure which is further extended into a three‐dimensional (3D) supramolecular structure via intermolecular π–π interactions, while CP 2 shows a different 3D supramolecular structure extended from one‐dimensional ladder chains by intermolecular π–π interactions. In addition, the solid‐state luminescence spectra of 1 and 2 were studied at room temperature.     

Selective,Cytotoxic Organoruthenium(II) Full‐Sandwich Complexes: A Structural,Computational and In Vitro Biological Study

A structurally diverse range of lipophilic, cationic η⁶‐arene η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl (η⁵‐Cp*) full‐sandwich complexes of ruthenium(II) have been prepared and structurally characterized by Fourier‐transform IR and NMR spectroscopy, electrospray mass spectrometry, and elemental microanalyses. Computational experiments incorporating the Hartree–Fock theory and the second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory predict each complex to possess a uniform δ+ electrostatic potential, with the cationic charge of the [RuCp*]⁺ moiety completely delocalizing throughout the molecular structure of each metallocene. In vitro cytotoxicity studies demonstrate these delocalized lipophilic cations to be potent growth inhibitors of eleven unique tumorigenic cell lines, while exhibiting significantly lower levels of toxicity towards both a normal human fibroblast and a mouse macrophage cell line. Single‐crystal X‐ray structural determinations are additionally reported for five complexes, [Ru(η⁶‐C₆H₅(CH₂)₂CH₃)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄, [Ru(η⁶‐C₆H₅CO₂CH₂CH₃)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BF₄, [Ru(η⁶‐C₁₀H₈)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄, [Ru(η⁶‐C₁₄H₁₀)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄, and [Ru(η⁶‐C₁₆H₁₀)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄.     

Two nickel(II) bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine complexes with homophthalic and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acids

Two new Ni^II complexes involving the ancillary ligand bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine (bpma) and two different carboxylate ligands, i.e. homophthalate [hph; systematic name: 2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)acetate] and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate (btc), namely catena‐poly[[aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)]‐μ‐2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)aceteto‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(C₉H₆O₄)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)]_n, and (μ‐benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O⁴,O⁵)bis(aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) bis(triaqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate hexahydrate, [Ni₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)₂(H₂O)₂]·[Ni(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)₃]₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)·6H₂O, (II), are presented. Compound (I) is a one‐dimensional polymer with hph acting as a bridging ligand and with the chains linked by weak C—H...O interactions. The structure of compound (II) is much more complex, with two independent Ni^II centres having different environments, one of them as part of centrosymmetric [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)]₂(btc) dinuclear complexes and the other in mononuclear [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)₃]²⁺ cations which (in a 2:1 ratio) provide charge balance for btc⁴⁻ anions. A profuse hydrogen‐bonding scheme, where both coordinated and crystal water molecules play a crucial role, provides the supramolecular linkage of the different groups.     

A new two‐dimensional ZnII coordination polymer constructed by a multidentate N‐heterocyclic ligand and 5‐carboxybenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate

In the coordination polymer, poly[[{μ‐1‐[(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐imidazole‐κ²N:N′}(μ‐5‐carboxybenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O³)zinc(II)] dimethylformamide monosolvate pentahydrate], {[Zn(C₉H₄O₆)(C₁₁H₁₀N₄)]·C₃H₇NO·5H₂O}_n, the Zn^II ion is coordinated by two N atoms from two symmetry‐related 1‐[(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐imidazole (bmi) ligands and two O atoms from two symmetry‐related 5‐carboxybenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate (Hbtc²⁻) ligands in a slightly distorted tetrahedral geometry. The Zn^II ions are bridged by Hbtc²⁻ and bmi ligands, leading to a 4‐connected two‐dimensional network with the topological notation (4⁴.6²). Adjacent layers are further connected by 12 kinds of hydrogen bonds and also by π–π interactions, resulting in a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture in the solid state.     

[(C6H10)(NH3)2][Ni(H2O)4C6H2(COO)4]·4H2O – A Coordination Polymer with the Chain‐like Polyanion {Ni(H2O)4[C6H2(COO)4]2−}n

Triclinic single crystals of [(C₆H₁₀)(NH₃)₂][Ni(H₂O)₄C₆H₂(COO)₄]·4H₂O have been prepared in aqueous solution at 55 °C. Space group (Nr. 2), a = 691.23(6), b = 924.84(5), c = 1082.43(7) pm, α = 74.208(6)°, β = 75.558(7)°, γ = 68.251(6)°, V = 0.60985(7) nm³, Z = 1. The Nickel(II) species, located on a crystallographic inversion centre, is coordinated in a trans‐octahedral fashion by two oxygen atoms stemming from the centrosymmetric pyromellitate anions and four from water molecules (Ni–O 205.82(12) – 208.11(13) pm). The connection between Ni²⁺ and [C₆H₂(COO)₄)]^4? leads to infinite chain‐like polyanions extending parallel to with {Ni(H₂O)₄[C₆H₂(COO)₄]^2?}_n composition. [(C₆H₁₀)(NH₃)₂]²⁺‐cations are accomodated between the chains, compensating for the negative charge of the polyanions. Thermogravimetric analysis in air showed that the loss of water of crystallisation occurs in two steps between 102 and 206 °C, corresponding to the loss of 6 and 2 water molecules per formula unit, respectively. The dehydrated sample was stable between 206 and 353 °C. Further decomposition yielded nickel(II) oxide (NiO).     

Exceeding Metal Capacity in Sandwich Complexes: Ligand‐Unsupported Docking of Extra Metal Moieties at Edges of a Metal Sheet Sandwich Complex

The ligand‐unsupported accommodation of extra metal moieties in a sandwich complex is reported. Although it has been considered that the metal‐capacity of a metal sheet sandwich complex is strictly limited by the size of cyclic unsaturated hydrocarbon ligands, the M?M edge bonds in a metal sheet sandwich complex provide a ligand‐unsupported docking site for extra metal moieties, allowing expansion of metal‐capacity in sandwich complexes. The metal sheet sandwich complex [Pd₄(μ₄‐C₈H₈)(μ₄‐C₉H₉)]⁺, in which the ligand‐based metal capacity is full in terms of the usage of all C=C moieties of the smaller carbocyclic ligand C₈H₈ in coordination, can accommodate extra M⁰{P(OPh)₃}₂ (M=Pd, Pt) moieties without coordinative assistance by either the C₉H₉ or the C₈H₈ ligand.     

Ringkontraktion durch NHC‐induzierte Pnictogen‐Abstraktion

Die Reaktion von [Cp′′′Co(η⁴‐P₄)] ( 1 ) (Cp′′′=1,2,4‐tBu₃C₅H₂) mit ^MeNHC (^MeNHC=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) führt über eine NHC‐induzierte Phosphorkationen‐Abstraktion zum Ringkontraktionsprodukt [(^MeNHC)₂P][Cp′′′Co(η³‐P₃)] ( 2 ), welches das erste Beispiel eines anionischen CoP₃‐Komplexes repräsentiert. Solche von NHCs induzierten Ringkontraktionsreaktionen lassen sich ebenfalls auf Tripeldecker‐Sandwich‐Komplexe anwenden. So werden die Komplexe [(Cp*Mo)₂(μ,η^6:6‐E₆)] ( 3 a , 3 b ) (Cp*=C₅Me₅; E=P, As) zu den Komplexen [(^MeNHC)₂E][(Cp*M)₂(μ,η^3:3‐E₃)(μ,η^2:2‐E₂)] ( 4 a , 4 b ) transformiert, wobei 4 b das erste strukturell charakterisierte Beispiel eines NHC‐substituierten As^I‐Kations darstellt. Darüber hinaus führt die Reaktion des Vanadium‐Komplexes [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 5 ) mit ^MeNHC zur Bildung der neuartigen Komplexe [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 6 ), [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^5:5‐P₅)] ( 7 ) bzw. [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^3:3‐P₃)(μ,η^1:1‐P{^MeNHC})] ( 8 ).     

Two new CoII coordination polymers with multifunctional 5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromoisophthalic acid and flexible isomeric bis(imidazole) ligands: preparation,crystal structure and characterization

Two new Co^II coordination polymers (CPs), namely, catena‐poly[[[(5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κO)aquacobalt(II)]‐bis[μ‐1,3‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene‐κ²N:N′]] 4.75‐hydrate], {[Co(C₈H₂Br₃NO₄)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)₂(H₂O)]·4.75H₂O}_n, (1), and poly[(μ‐5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O³)[μ‐1,2‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene‐κ²N:N′]cobalt(II)], [Co(C₈H₂Br₃NO₄)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)]_n, (2), have been synthesized successfully by the assembly of multifunctional 5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromoisophthalic acid (H₂ATBIP) and Co^II ions in the presence of the flexible isomeric bis(imidazole) ligands 1,3‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene (mbix) and 1,2‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene (obix). The isomeric mbix and obix ligands have a big influence on the structures of CPs (1) and (2). CP (1) is composed of chains of nanometre‐sized elliptical rings, in which the Co^II atom exhibits a distorted octahedral coordination geometry and ATBIP²⁻ acts as a monodentate ligand. Two adjacent chains are interlinked by π–π stacking interactions and hydrogen bonds, resulting in a supramolecular double chain. Hydrogen‐bonded R₈⁶(16) rings extend adjacent supramolecular double chains into a two‐dimensional supramolecular layer. Halogen bonding and a hydrogen‐bonded R₄²(8) ring further link the two‐dimensional supramolecular layers, leading to the formation of a three‐dimensional supramolecular network. The Co^II ion in CP (2) is tetracoordinated, exhibiting a distorted tetrahedral configuration. The ATBIP²⁻ ligand exhibits a bis(monodentate) coordination bridging mode, linking adjacent Co^II ions into zigzag chains, which are further bridged by the auxiliary bridging obix ligand, resulting in a two‐dimensional (4,4) topological network. Interlayer hydrogen and halogen–halogen bonding further extend the two‐dimensional layers into a three‐dimensional supramolecular network. A detailed analysis of the solid‐state UV–Vis–NIR diffuse‐reflectance spectra of (1) and (2) indicates that a wide optical band gap exists in both (1) and (2). CP (1) exhibits an irreversible dehydration–rehydration behaviour.     

Comparative Studies of Thermally Induced Homolytic CarbonCarbon Bond Cleavage Reactions of Strained Dicarba[2]ferrocenophanes and Their Ring‐Opened Oligomers and Polymers

Reactivity studies of dicarba[2]ferrocenophanes and also their corresponding ring‐opened oligomers and polymers have been conducted in order to provide mechanistic insight into the processes that occur under the conditions of their thermal ring‐opening polymerisation (ROP) (300 °C). Thermolysis of dicarba[2]ferrocenophane rac‐[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CHPh)₂] (rac‐ 14 ; 300 °C, 1 h) does not lead to thermal ROP. To investigate this system further, rac‐ 14 was heated in the presence of an excess of cyclopentadienyl anion, to mimic the postulated propagating sites for thermally polymerisable analogues. This afforded acyclic [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)‐CH₂Ph] ( 17 ) through cleavage of both a Fe?Cp bond and also the C?C bond derived from the dicarba bridge. Evidence supporting a potential homolytic C?C bond cleavage pathway that occurs in the absence of ring‐strain was provided through thermolysis of an acyclic analogue of rac‐ 14 , namely [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(CHPh)₂‐C₅H₅] ( 15 ; 300 °C, 1 h), which also afforded ferrocene derivative 17 . This reactivity pathway appears general for post‐ROP species bearing phenyl substituents on adjacent carbons, and consequently was also observed during the thermolysis of linear polyferrocenylethylene [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CHPh)₂]_n ( 16 ; 300 °C, 1 h), which was prepared by photocontrolled ROP of rac‐ 14 at 5 °C. This afforded ferrocene derivative [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄CH₂Ph)₂] ( 23 ) through selective cleavage of the ?H(Ph)C?C(Ph)H? bonds in the dicarba linkers. These processes appear to be facilitated by the presence of bulky, radical‐stabilising phenyl substituents on each carbon of the linker, as demonstrated through the contrasting thermal properties of unsubstituted linear trimer [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] ( 29 ) with a ?H₂C?CH₂? spacer, which proved significantly more stable under analogous conditions. Evidence for the radical intermediates formed through C?C bond cleavage was detected through high‐resolution mass spectrometric analysis of co‐thermolysis reactions involving rac‐ 14 and 15 (300 °C, 1 h), which indicated the presence of higher molecular weight species, postulated to be formed through cross‐coupling of these intermediates.     

Ring Contraction by NHC‐Induced Pnictogen Abstraction

The reaction of [Cp′′′Co(η⁴‐P₄)] ( 1 ) (Cp′′′=1,2,4‐tBu₃C₅H₂) with ^MeNHC (^MeNHC=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) leads through NHC‐induced phosphorus cation abstraction to the ring contraction product [(^MeNHC)₂P][Cp′′′Co(η³‐P₃)] ( 2 ), which represents the first example of an anionic CoP₃ complex. Such NHC‐induced ring contraction reactions are also applicable for triple‐decker sandwich complexes. The complexes [(Cp*Mo)₂(μ,η^6:6‐E₆)] ( 3 a , 3 b ) (Cp*=C₅Me₅; E=P, As) can be transformed to the complexes [(^MeNHC)₂E][(Cp*M)₂(μ,η^3:3‐E₃)(μ,η^2:2‐E₂)] ( 4 a , 4 b ), with 4 b representing the first structurally characterized example of an NHC‐substituted As^I cation. Further, the reaction of the vanadium complex [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 5 ) with ^MeNHC results in the formation of the unprecedented complexes [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^6:6‐P₆)] ( 6 ), [(^MeNHC)₂P][(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^5:5‐P₅)] ( 7 ) and [(Cp*V)₂(μ,η^3:3‐P₃)(μ,η^1:1‐P{^MeNHC})] ( 8 ).     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Killing two birds with one stone: 2D+2D→3D parallel stacking and 3D self‐penetrating structures in one reaction and their crystal‐to‐crystal transformation

Reaction of the flexible phenolic carboxylate ligand 2‐(3,5‐dicarboxylbenzyloxy)benzoic acid (H₃L) with nickel salts in the presence of 1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethylene (bpe) leads to the generation of a mixture of the two complexes under solvolthermal conditions, namely poly[[aqua[μ‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethylene‐κ²N:N′]{μ‐5‐[(2‐carboxyphenoxy)methyl]benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ³O¹,O^1′:O³}nickel(II)] dimethylformamide hemisolvate monohydrate], {[Ni(C₁₆H₁₀O₇)(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)(H₂O)]·0.5C₃H₇NO·H₂O}_n or {[Ni(HL)(bpe)(H₂O)]·0.5DMF·H₂O}_n, 1 , and poly[[diaquatris[μ‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethylene‐κ²N:N′]bis{μ‐5‐[(2‐carboxyphenoxy)methyl]benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O⁵}nickel(II)] dimethylformamide disolvate hexahydrate], {[Ni₂(C₁₆H₁₀O₇)₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)₃(H₂O)₂]·2C₃H₇NO·6H₂O}_n or {[Ni₂(HL)₂(bpe)₃(H₂O)₂]·2DMF·6H₂O}_n, 2 . In complex 1 , the Ni^II centres are connected by the carboxylate and bpe ligands to form two‐dimensional (2D) 4‐connected (4,4) layers, which are extended into a 2D+2D→3D (3D is three‐dimensional) supramolecular framework. In complex 2 , bpe ligands connect to Ni^II centres to form 2D layers with Ni₆(bpe)₆ metallmacrocycles. Interestingly, 2D+2D→3D inclined polycatenation was observed between these layers. The final 5‐connected 3D self‐penetrating structure was generated through further connection of Ni–carboxylate chains with these inclined motifs. Both complexes were fully characterized by single‐crystal analysis, powder X‐ray diffraction analysis, FT–IR spectra, elemental analyses, thermal analysis and UV–Vis spectra. Notably, an interesting metal/ligand‐induced crystal‐to‐crystal transformation was observed between the two complexes.     

Stacking of Benzene with Metal Chelates: Calculated CCSD(T)/CBS Interaction Energies and Potential‐Energy Curves

Accurate values for the energies of stacking interactions of nickel‐ and copper‐based six‐membered chelate rings with benzene are calculated at the CCSD(T)/CBS level. The results show that calculations made at the ωB97xD/def2‐TZVP level are in excellent agreement with CCSD(T)/CBS values. The energies of [Cu(C₃H₃O₂)(HCO₂)] and [Ni(C₃H₃O₂)(HCO₂)] chelates stacking with benzene are ?6.39 and ?4.77 kcal mol^?1, respectively. Understanding these interactions might be important for materials with properties that are dependent on stacking interactions.     

Synthesis,Reactivity and Crystal Structures of the Palladium(II) Complexes with the Pyrimidine Containing Ligand: Crystal Structures of [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐S2CNC4H8)] and [Pd(PPh3)(η1‐C4H3N2)(η2‐Tp)]

Treatment of Pd(PPh₃)₄ with 5‐bromo‐pyrimidine [C₄H₃N₂Br] in dichloromethane at ambient temperature cause the oxidative addition reaction to produce the palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(Br)], 1 , by substituting two triphenylphosphine ligands. In acetonitrile solution of 1 in refluxing temperature for 1 day, it do not undergo displacement of the triphenylphosphine ligand to form the dipalladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)Br]₂{μ,η²‐(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)}₂, or bromide ligand to form chelating pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐C₄H₃N₂)]Br. Complex 1 reacted with bidentate ligand, NH₄S₂CNC₄H₈, and tridentate ligand, KTp {Tp = tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate}, to obtain the η²‐dithiocarbamate η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐S₂CNC₄H₈)], 4 and η²‐Tp η¹‐pyrimidine complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐C₄H₃N₂)(η²‐Tp)], 5 , respectively. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

A Neutral Tetraphosphacyclobutadiene Ligand in Cobalt(I) Complexes

The unusual reactivity of the newly synthesized β‐diketiminato cobalt(I) complexes, [(L^DepCo)₂] ( 2 a , L^Dep=CH[C(Me)N(2,6‐Et₂C₆H₃)]₂) and [L^DippCo ? toluene] ( 2 b , L^Dipp=CH[CHN(2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)]₂), toward white phosphorus was investigated, affording the first cobalt(I) complexes [(L^DepCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)] ( 3 a ) and [(L^DippCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)] ( 3 b ) bearing the neutral cyclo‐P₄ ligand with a rectangular‐planar structure. The redox chemistry of 3 a and 3 b was studied by cyclic voltammetry and their chemical reduction with one molar equivalent of potassium graphite led to the isolation of [(L^DepCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)][K(dme)₄] ( 4 a ) and [(L^DippCo)₂(μ₂:η⁴,η⁴‐P₄)][K(dme)₄] ( 4 b ). Unexpectedly, the monoanionic Co₂P₄ core in 4 a and 4 b , respectively, contains the two‐electron‐reduced cyclo‐P₄^2? ligand with a square‐planar structure and mixed‐valent cobalt(I,II) sites. The electronic structures of 3 a , 3 b , 4 a , and 4 b were elucidated by NMR and EPR spectroscopy as well as magnetic measurements and are in agreement with results of broken‐symmetry DFT calculations.     

N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Analogues of Thiele and Chichibabin Hydrocarbons

Stable N‐heterocyclic carbene analogues of Thiele and Chichibabin hydrocarbons, [(IPr)(C₆H₄)(IPr)] and [(IPr)(C₆H₄)₂(IPr)] ( 4 and 5 , respectively; IPr=C{N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂CHCH), are reported. In a nickel‐catalyzed double carbenylation of 1,4‐Br₂C₆H₄ and 4,4′‐Br₂(C₆H₄)₂ with IPr ( 1 ), [(IPr)(C₆H₄)(IPr)](Br)₂ ( 2 ) and [(IPr)(C₆H₄)₂(IPr)](Br)₂ ( 3 ) were generated, which respectively afforded 4 and 5 as crystalline solids upon reduction with KC₈. Experimental and computational studies support the semiquinoidal nature of 5 with a small singlet?triplet energy gap ΔE_S?T of 10.7 kcal mol^?1, whereas 4 features more quinoidal character with a rather large ΔE_S?T of 25.6 kcal mol^?1. In view of the low ΔE_S?T, 4 and 5 may be described as biradicaloids. Moreover, 5 has considerable (41 %) diradical character.     

Comparative Study of Phosphine and N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Stabilized Group 13 Adducts [L(EH3)] and [L2(E2Hn)]

Quantum chemical calculations using density functional theory at the BP86/TZ2P level have been carried out to determine the geometries and stabilities of Group 13 adducts [(PMe₃)(EH₃)] and [(PMe₃)₂(E₂H_n)] (E=B–In; n=4, 2, 0). The optimized geometries exhibit, in most cases, similar features to those of related adducts [(NHC^Me)(EH₃)] and [(NHC^Me)₂(E₂H_n)] with a few exceptions that can be explained by the different donor strengths of the ligands. The calculations show that the carbene ligand L=NHC^Me (:C(NMeCH)₂) is a significantly stronger donor than L=PMe₃. The equilibrium geometries of [L(EH₃)] possess, in all cases, a pyramidal structure, whereas the complexes [L₂(E₂H₄)] always have an antiperiplanar arrangement of the ligands L. The phosphine ligands in [(PMe₃)₂(B₂H₂)], which has C_s symmetry, are in the same plane as the B₂H₂ moiety, whereas the heavier homologues [(PMe₃)₂(E₂H₂)] (E=Al, Ga, In) have C_i symmetry in which the ligands bind side‐on to the E₂H₂ acceptor. This is in contrast to the [(NHC^Me)₂(E₂H₂)] adducts for which the NHC^Me donor always binds in the same plane as E₂H₂ except for the indium complex [(NHC^Me)₂(In₂H₂)], which exhibits side‐on bonding. The boron complexes [L₂(B₂)] (L=PMe₃ and NHC^Me) possess a linear arrangement of the LBBL moiety, which has a B?B triple bond. The heavier homologues [L₂(E₂)] have antiperiplanar arrangements of the LEEL moieties, except for [(PMe₃)₂(In₂)], which has a twisted structure in which the PInInP torsion angle is 123.0°. The structural features of the complexes [L(EH₃)] and [L₂(E₂H_n)] can be explained in terms of donor–acceptor interactions between the donors L and the acceptors EH₃ and E₂H_n, which have been analyzed quantitatively by using the energy decomposition analysis (EDA) method. The calculations predict that the hydrogenation reaction of the dimeric magnesium(I) compound L′MgMgL′ with the complexes [L(EH₃)] is energetically more favorable for L=PMe₃ than for NHC^Me.