The Thermolysis of [Ru3(CO)12] in Cyclohexene: Synthesis and Charaterisation of the New Clusters [Ru3H2(CO)9(μ3-η1:η2:η1-C6H8)] and [Ru5(CO)12(μ4-η2-C6H8)(η4-C6H8)]

Thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] in cyclohexene for 24 h affords the complexes [Ru(CO)₃(η⁴-C₆H₈)] (1), [Ru₃H₂(CO)₉(μ₂-η¹:η²:η¹-C₆H₈)] (2), [Ru₄(CO)₁₂(μ₄-C₆H₈)] (3) [Ru₄(CO)₉(μ₄-C₆H₈)(η⁶-C₆H₆)] (4a and 4b, two isomers) and [Ru₅(CO)₁₂(μ₄-η²-C₆H₈)(η⁴-C₆H₈)] (5), where 1, 3, 4a and 4b have been previously characterised as products of the thermolysis of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with cyclohexa-1,3-diene. The molecular structures of the new clusters 2 and 5 were determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, showing that two conformational polymorphs of 5 exist in the solid state, differing in the orientation of the cyclohexa-1,3-diene ligand on a ruthenium vertex.     

Comparison of the Bonding of Benzene and C60 to a Metal Cluster: Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η 2,η2-C6H6) and Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η2,η2-C60)

The electron distributions and bonding in Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆) and Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) are examined via electronic structure calculations in order to compare the nature of ligation of benzene and buckminsterfullerene to the common Ru₃(CO)₉ inorganic cluster. A fragment orbital approach, which is aided by the relatively high symmetry that these molecules possess, reveals important features of the electronic structures of these two systems. Reported crystal structures show that both benzene and C₆₀ are geometrically distorted when bound to the metal cluster fragment, and our ab initio calculations indicate that the energies of these distortions are similar. The experimental Ru–C_fullerene bond lengths are shorter than the corresponding Ru–C_benzene distances and the Ru–Ru bond lengths are longer in the fullerene-bound cluster than for the benzene-ligated cluster. Also, the carbonyl stretching frequencies are slightly higher for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) than for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆). As a whole, these observations suggest that electron density is being pulled away from the metal centers and CO ligands to form stronger Ru–C_fullerene than Ru–C_benzene bonds. Fenske-Hall molecular orbital calculations show that an important interaction is donation of electron density in the metal–metal bonds to empty orbitals of C₆₀ and C₆H₆. Bonds to the metal cluster that result from this interaction are the second highest occupied orbitals of both systems. A larger amount of density is donated to C₆₀ than to C₆H₆, thus accounting for the longer metal–metal bonds in the fullerene-bound cluster. The principal metal–arene bonding modes are the same in both systems, but the more band-like electronic structure of the fullerene (i.e., the greater number density of donor and acceptor orbitals in a given energy region) as compared to C₆H₆ permits a greater degree of electron flow and stronger bonding between the Ru₃(CO)₉ and C₆₀ fragments. Of significance to the reduction chemistry of M₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) molecules, the HOMO is largely localized on the metal–carbonyl fragment and the LUMO is largely localized on the C₆₀ portion of the molecule. The localized C₆₀ character of the LUMO is consistent with the similarity of the first two reductions of this class of molecules to the first two reductions of free C₆₀. The set of orbitals above the LUMO shows partial delocalization (in an antibonding sense) to the metal fragment, thus accounting for the relative ease of the third reduction of this class of molecules compared to the third reduction of free C₆₀.     

The preparation of a series of ring-linked derivatives of [Fe2(η-C5H5)2(CO)2(μ-CO)2] starting from [Fe2η5,η5-C5H4CH(NMe3)CH(NMe2)C5H4}(CO)2(μ-CO)2]+ salts

The salts [Fe₂η⁵,η⁵-C₅H₄CH{NMe₃)CH(NMe₂)C₅H₄}(CO)₂(μ-CO)₂][X] (X = I or SO₃CF₃) are the synthetic precursors to a wide range of [Fe₂(η-C₅H₅)₂(CO)₂(μ-CO)₂] derivatives in which the two cyclopentadienyl ligands are joined by a two-carbon bridge.     

Novel Hydrogen Transfer Reactions to the Ligated 1,2,4-Triphosphole in [Ru(η4-C8H12){η-P3C2But 2CH(SiMe3)2}]

INTRODUCTION

As discussed in a recent preliminary publication¹, the complex [Ru(η⁴-C₈H₁₂){η-P₃C₂Bu^t ₂CH(SiMe₃)₂}] (1) (C₈H₁₂ = cycloocta-l,5-diene) was prepared by the reaction of [Ru(η⁶-C₁₀H₈)(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)] (2) (C₁₀H₈ = naphthalene) with the 1,2,4-triphosphole P₃C₂Bu^t ₂CH(SiMe₃)₂ (3) (Fig. 1), illustrating the aromatic behaviour of (3).     

An Improved Synthesis for Novel Hexaruthenium Cluster Compound Bearing Two Quadruply-Bridging CO Ligands: Synthesis, Characterization, and X-Ray Structural Analysis of Ru6(CO)12(μ3-H)(μ-CO) (μ4-η2-CO)2[η5-C5H4(SiMe3)]

The hexaruthenium cluster compound Ru₆(₃-H)(CO)₁₅[C₅H₄(SiMe₃)] (2), possessing two ₄-²-CO ligands and with the Ru[C₅H₄(SiMe₃)] fragment located at the apex of the central tetrahedral framework, was prepared in low yield by refluxing a toluene solution of C₅H₅(SiMe₃) with excess Ru₃(CO)₁₂. This unique complex was characterized by spectroscopic methods and by X-ray structural analysis. The possible mechanism leading to its formation is discussed.     

Reactions of Unsaturated Quinoline Triosmium Clusters [Os3(CO)9(μ3-η2-C9H5(4-R)N)(μ-H)] (R=Me or H) with Tetramethylthiourea: X-ray Structures of [Os3(CO)8(μ-η2-C9H5(4-Me)N)(η2-SC(NMe2NCH2Me)(μ-H)2] and [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-C9H6N)(η1-SC(NMe2)2)(μ-H)]

Treatment of the electronically unsaturated 4-methylquinoline triosmium cluster $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu_3\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-}\hbox{C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5} \hbox{(4-Me)N})(\upmu\hbox{-H})]$ (1) with tetramethylthiourea in refluxing cyclohexane at 81°C gave $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{8}(\upmu\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5} \hbox{(4-Me)N})(\upeta^2\hbox{-SC}(\hbox{NMe}_2\hbox{NCH}_2\hbox{Me})(\upmu \hbox{-H})_2]$ (2) and $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5}\hbox{(4-Me)N})(\upeta^1\hbox{-SC}(\hbox{NMe}_2)_2)(\upmu\hbox{-H})]$ (3). In contrast, a similar reaction of the corresponding quinoline compound $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu_{3}\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{6}\hbox{N})(\upmu\hbox{-H})]$ (4) with tetramethylthiourea afforded $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu\hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{6}\hbox{N})(\upeta^{1}\hbox{-SC(NMe}_{2})_{2})(\upmu\hbox{-H)}]$ (5) as the only product. Compound 2 contains a cyclometallated tetramethylthiourea ligand which is chelating at the rear osmium atom and a quinolyl ligand coordinated to the Os₃ triangle via the nitrogen lone pair and the C(8) atom of the carbocyclic ring. In 3 and 5, the tetramethylthiourea ligand is coordinated at an equatorial site of the osmium atom, which is also bound to the carbon atom of the quinolyl ligand. Compounds 3 and 5 react with PPh₃ at room temperature to give the previously reported phosphine substituted products $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO)}_{9}(\upmu \hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{5}\hbox{(4-Me)N)(PPh}_{3})(\upmu\hbox{-H)}]$ (6) and $[\hbox{Os}_{3}\hbox{(CO}_{9}(\upmu \hbox{-}\upeta^{2}\hbox{-C}_{9}\hbox{H}_{6}\hbox{N)(PPh}_{3})(\upmu\hbox{-H)}]$ (7) by the displacement of the tetramethylthiourea ligand.     

Synthesis of the dimetal compounds [FeW{μ-PPh2 · CH · CH2 C(C6H4Me-4)}(CO)5(η5-C5Me5)] and [FeMo{μ-PPh2 · CH · CH2 · C(C6H4Me-4)}(CO)5(η5-C5H5)]; molecular structure of the iron-tungsten compound

Reactions between diphenyl(vinyl)phosphine and the compounds [FeW(μ-CC₆H₄Me-4)(CO)₅(η⁵-C₅Me₅)] and [FeMo(μ-CC₆H₄Me-4)(CO)₆(η⁵-C₅H₅)] result in a coupling of the vinyl and p-tolylmethylidyne groups at the dimetal centres to produce the PPh₂ · CH · CH₂ · C(C₆H₄Me-4) fragment, which bridges the metal-metal bonds. This was confirmed by an X-ray diffraction study on [FeW{μ-PPh₂ · CH · CH₂ · C(C₆H₄Me-4)}(CO)₅(η⁵-C₅Me₅)].     

Crystal structure of twinned (η5-C5(CH3)4CF3) (η5-C5(CH3)5)Ru

The substituted sandwich complex crystallizes in monoclinic space groupP2₁/m withZ=2. Twinning to the (001) direction with the special conditionc ^*/4a ^* = cos ^* causes systematic superposition of the reciprocal lattices of both domains and results in an apparent unit cell with double volume and the reflection condition (2h)kl, l=2n. The structure solution was obtained with the subset of intensity data for the predominant individuum and converged atR = 0.040,R _w =0.046 for 832 independent observations and 122 variables. The molecules show disorder with respect to the crystallographic mirror plane. The structure is closely related to that of decamethylruthenocene.     

Synthesis and structures of the η5-C5H5Cl(CO)2W-η1,η5-(PPh2)C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)3 and MeSi[C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)2PPh3]3 complexes

The metallation of the η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex with BuⁿLi (THF, ?78 °C) followed by the treatment of the lithium derivative with Ph₂PCl afforded the η⁵-Ph₂PC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex. The reaction of the latter with η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₃WCl in the presence of Me₃NO produced the trinuclear complex η⁵-C₅H₅Cl(CO)₂W-η¹,η⁵-(Ph₂P)C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃. The structure of the latter complex was established by IR, UV, and 1H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The reaction of MeSiCl₃ with three equivalents of LiC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃ gave the hexanuclear complex MeSi[C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃]₃.     

Reaction of alkyne cluster Os3(μ-CO)(CO)9(μ3-η1:η1:η2-Me3SiC2Me) with HC≡CCOOMe. Molecular and crystal structures of Os3(CO)9{μ3-η1:η1:η2:η2-C(SiMe3)C(Me)C(COOMe)CH× and Os3(CO)8{μ3-η1:η1:η4:η1-C(SiMe3)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)CH× complexes

Reaction of the cluster Os₃(μ-CO)(CO)₉(μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²-Me₃SiC₂Me) with HC≡CCOOMe in benzene at 70 °C results in Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(COOMe)CH× (5), Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)CH× (6), Os₃(CO)₉{μ-η¹:η¹:η⁴-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)CH× (7), and Os₃(CO)_δ{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η⁴:η¹-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)× complexes (8), containing an osmacyclopentadiene moiety. Complexes5–8 were characterized by¹H NMR and IR spectroscopy. The structure of clusters5 and8 was confirmed by X-ray analysis. Complex7 is formed from cluster5 as a result of a new intramolecular rearrangement and complex8 is obtained by decarbonylation of compound6. Complex8 adds PPh₃ to give Os₃(CO)_δ(PPh₃){μ-η¹:η¹:η⁴-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)×.     

Organometallic polymorphism. Synthesis and structural characterization of two forms of [Ru(η6-C6H6)(η6-C6H4(CH3)COOCH3)][BF4]2 and the phase transition in [Ru(η5-C5H5)(η6-C6H5OH)][PF6]

The synthesis and structural characterization of the complex [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₆)(η⁶-C₆H₄(CH₃)COOCH₃)] [BF₄]₂ (2) and of its precursor [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₄(CH₃)COOCH₃)Cl₂]₂ (1) are reported. Compound (2) has been characterized in two polymorphic modifications (2a and 2b) and the molecular organization in the solid state has been investigated. The complex [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(η⁶-C₆H₅OH)][PF₆] (3) has also been investigated; it has been shown to possess a disorder similar to that observed in the high temperature phase of related systems such as [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(η⁶-C₆H₆)][PF₆].     

The synthesis,electrochemistry and molecular structure of [Fe(η5-C5H4S)2Mo(NO){HB(3,5-Me2C3N2H)3}]

The new bimetallic complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅H₄S)₂Mo(NO){HB(3,5-Me₂C₃N₂H)₃)}] has been obtained from the reaction between [Fe(η⁵-C₅H₄SH)₂] and [Mo(NO){HB(3,5-Me₂C₃N₂H)₃}I₂]. Electrochemical studies reveal an anomalously cathodic oxidation potential for the metallocene redox centre. An X-ray diffraction study has revealed an FMo distance of 4.147(2) Å, with the ferrocenyl moiety oriented towards the nitrosyl ligand on the molybdenum atoms (Fe---O 3.976(6) Å), but provides no evidence for an interaction between the iron atom and the molybdenum-bound nitrosyl which might account for the electrochemical findings.     

Os3(CO)9(μ3-AsC6H4CH3)(μ3-C6H3CH3) synthesis and crystal structure

One of the products of the reaction of the activated cluster Os₃(CO)₁₁(NCMe) with As(p-tol)₃ in refluxing nonane has been shown by spectroscopic and X-ray crystallographic methods to be Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃-AsC₆H₄CH₃)(μ₃-C₆H₃CH₃), which contains a benzyne moiety bonded asymmetrically from one carbon to one osmium via a σ bond and from a second carbon to form a bridge between the remaining two osmium atoms.     

New electron-deficient alkene and alkyne derivatives of Ru5(μ5-C)(CO)15: The syntheses and crystal structure analyses of Ru5(μ5-C)(CO)13 [C2H2(CO2Me)2] and Ru5(μ5-C)(CO)15 [C2(CO2Me)2]

Treatment of carbido cluster Ru₅(μ ₅-C)(CO)₁₅ with Me₃NO in acetonitrile solution followed by addition of dimethyl maleate or dimethyl acetylene dicarboxylate affords new clusters Ru₅(μ ₅-C)(CO)₁₃[C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂] (1) and Ru₅(μ ₅-C)(CO)₁₅[C₂(CO₂Me)₂] (2), respectively. Single crystal X-ray structural studies reveal that both complexes contain a wingtip-bridged butterfly pentametallic skeleton. In complex1 the maleate fragment is coordinated to one wingtip Ru atom through its carbon-carbon double bond and to the adjacent Ru atom by the formation of two O → Ru dative bonding interactions, while the acetylene dicarboxylate fragment in2 is best considered as acis-dimetallated alkene, linking one hinge Ru atom and the nearby Ru atom at the bridged position. Crystal data for1: space group P 4₂/n;a=20.199(6),c=13.941(3) Å,Z=8; finalR _F=0.025,R _w=0.026 for 3963 reflections withI>2σ(I). Crystal data for2: space group P2₁/n;a=9.634(3),b=20.062(6),c=17.372(5) Å,β=90.62(2)°,Z=4; finalR _F=0 033,R _w=0.036 for 4683 reflections withI>3σ(I).     

Synthesis and reactions of phosphido-bridged μ3-alkylidyne clusters; X-ray crystal structures of the complexes [Co2W(μ-PEt2)3(CO)5(η-C5H5)], [Co2W{μ3-C(R)C(Et)C(Et)C(O)}(μ-CO)(CO)4(PPh2{C(Et)CHEt})(η-C5H5)], and [CoW{μ-C(R)C(Et)C(Et)C(OH)}(CO)4(η-C5H5)] (R = C6H4Me-4)

Reactions of the phosphido-bridged complexes [Co₂W(μ-H)(μ₃-CC₆H₄Me-4)(μ-PR₂)(CO)₆(η-C₅H₅)] (R = Ph or Et) with PR₂H (R = Ph or Et) or RCCR (R = Me or Et) are dominated by processes involving facile PC, CC and CH bond formation. The X-ray structures of the complexes [Co₂W(μ-PEt₂)₃(CO)₅(η-C₅H₅)], [Co₂W{μ₃-C(R)C(Et)C(Et)C(O)}(μ-CO)(CO)₄(PPh₂{C(Et)CHEt})(η-C₅H₅)], and [CoW{μ-C(R)C(Et)C(Et)C(OH)}(CO)₄(η-C₅H₅)] (R = C₆H₄Me-4) have been determined.     

Preparation and crystal structures of [μ-SbPh2]2[Mo(CO)2(η5-C5H5)]2·CHCl3 and SbPh[Fe(CO)2(η5-C5H5)]2

Antimony is reduced when [SbPh₂BrO]₂ is treated with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵-C₅H₅)] to produce [μ-SbPh₂]₂[Mo(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅)]₂. A structure determination shows diphenylstibido groups bridging between two Mo(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅) moieties giving a central ‘butterfly’ shaped Sb₂Mo₂ ring. The cyclopentadiene rings are trans to each other and Mo–Sb and Sb–Sb separations are both short. An iron analogue could not be obtained from [SbPh₂BrO]₂ and Na[Fe(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅)] but a mixture of SbPh[Fe(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅)]₂ and SbPh₂[Fe(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅)] was obtained using SbPh₂Cl. An X-ray structure for SbPh[Fe(CO)₂(η⁵-C₅H₅)]₂ shows an open stibinidine structure.     

Unexpected Carbon–Carbon Bond Cleavage in the Reactions of the Pentagonal Bipyramidal Cluster Fe3(CO)6(μ-CO)2[μ3-η4-{RCC(Et)C(Et)CR}] with Styrene. Synthesis and X-ray Structure of Fe3(CO)6[μ3-η4-{EtC2CR}]2 (R = CH3(=CH2))

The thermal reactions of 2-methyl-1-hexen-3-yne [CH₃CH₂C≡CC(=CH₂)CH₃, metey] with Fe₃(CO)₁₂ have been studied: cluster opening or fragmentation and alkyne dimerization occur. Main products are the open triangular isomers [Fe₃(CO)₆(μ-CO)₂{CH₃(=CH₂)CC(Et)C(Et)C(=CH₂)CH₃}] (complex 3a) and [Fe₃(CO)₆(μ-CO)₂{C(Et)CCH₃(=CH₂)C(Et)CCH₃(=CH₂)}] (complex 3b). The structure and isomerism of the complexes has been confirmed by X-ray studies. The minor products of the reaction have been characterized by spectroscopic techniques. An attempt at exploiting the reactivity of the “free” C=C bonds of the coordinated ene-yne was made: complex 3a was reacted with styrene under thermal conditions. Unexpectedly considerable yields of the closed triangular cluster [Fe₃(CO)₆{EtC₂C(=CH₂)CH₃}₂] (complex 5) have been obtained. This behaviour had not been previously observed. The unprecedented structure of complex 5 has been confirmed with an X-ray study.     

The cleavage of a coordinated SCNR group in [Fe(CO)2L2(η2-SCNR)] by [Co(η-C5H5)(PPh3)2] to give complexes containing μ3-CNR ligand. The preparation and structure of [{Co(η-C5H5)}2{Fe(CO)2(PPh3)}(μ3-S){μ3-CNC(O)C6H5}]

The reaction of [Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂{η²-SCNC(O)Ph}] with [Co(η-C₅H₅)(PPh₃)₂] in benzene solution at room temperature results in the facile cleavage of the CS bond of the SCNC(O)Ph ligand to give [{Co(η-C₅H₅)}₂{Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)}(μ₃-S{μ₃-CNC(O)Ph}], whereas [Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂(η²-SCNMe)] gives [{Co(η-C₅H₅)} ₂₂{Fe(CO)(CNMe)(PPh₃)(μ₃-S)(μ₃-CO)]. The structure of [{Co(η-C₅H₅)}₂{Fe(CO)₂(PPh₃)} (μ₃-CNC(O)Ph}] has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction.