On strictly Deza graphs with parameters (n,k,k−1,a)

A non-empty $k$-regular graph $\Gamma$ on $n$ vertices is called a Deza graph if there exist constants $b$ and $a$ $(b\ge a)$ such that any pair of distinct vertices of $\Gamma$ has either $b$ or $a$ common neighbours. The quantities $n$, $k$, $b$, and $a$ are called the parameters of $\Gamma$ and are written as the quadruple $(n,k,b,a)$. If a Deza graph has diameter 2 and is not strongly regular, then it is called a strictly Deza graph. In the present paper, we investigate strictly Deza graphs whose parameters $(n,k,b,a)$ satisfy the conditions $k=b+1$ and $\frac{k(k-1)-a(n-1)}{b-a}>1$.     

On the size of special class 1 graphs and (P3;k)-co-critical graphs

A well-known theorem of Vizing states that if G is a simple graph with maximum degree Δ, then the chromatic index ${\chi }^{\prime }(G)$ of G is Δ or $\mathrm{\Delta }+1$. A graph G is class 1 if ${\chi }^{\prime }(G)=\mathrm{\Delta }$, and class 2 if ${\chi }^{\prime }(G)=\mathrm{\Delta }+1$; G is Δ-critical if it is connected, class 2 and ${\chi }^{\prime }(G-e)<{\chi }^{\prime }(G)$ for every $e\in E(G)$. A long-standing conjecture of Vizing from 1968 states that every Δ-critical graph on n vertices has at least $(n(\mathrm{\Delta }-1)+3)/2$ edges. We initiate the study of determining the minimum number of edges of class 1 graphs G, in addition, ${\chi }^{\prime }(G+e)={\chi }^{\prime }(G)+1$ for every $e\in E(\bar{G})$. Such graphs have intimate relation to $(P_3;k)$-co-critical graphs, where a non-complete graph G is $(P_3;k)$-co-critical if there exists a k-coloring of $E(G)$ such that G does not contain a monochromatic copy of $P_3$ but every k-coloring of $E(G+e)$ contains a monochromatic copy of $P_3$ for every $e\in E(\bar{G})$. We use the bound on the size of the aforementioned class 1 graphs to study the minimum number of edges over all $(P_3;k)$-co-critical graphs. We prove that if G is a $(P_3;k)$-co-critical graph on $n\ge k+2$ vertices, then$e(G)\ge \frac{k}{2}(n-\lceil \frac{k}{2}\rceil -\epsilon )+\left(\begin{array}{c}\lceil k/2\rceil +\epsilon \\ 2\end{array}\right),$ where ε is the remainder of $n-\lceil k/2\rceil$ when divided by 2. This bound is best possible for all $k\ge 1$ and $n\ge \lceil 3k/2\rceil +2$.     

Number of minimum vertex cuts in transitive graphs

Let G be a k-regular vertex transitive graph with connectivity κ(G)=k and let m_k(G) be the number of vertex cuts with k vertices. Define m(n,k)=min{m_k(G): GT_n,k}, where T_n,k denotes the set of all k-regular vertex transitive graphs on n vertices with κ(G)=k. In this paper, we determine the exact values of m(n,k).     

On All Fractional （a,b, k）-Critical Graphs

Let a,b,k,r be nonnegative integers with 1≤a≤b and r≥2.LetG be a graph of order n with n(a+b)(r(a+b)-2)+ak/a.In this paper,we first show a characterization for all fractional(a,b,k)-critical graphs.Then using the result,we prove that G is all fractional(a,b,k)-critical if δ(G)≥(r-1)b2/a+k and |NG(x1)∪NG(x2)∪···∪NG(xr)|≥bn+ak/a+b for any independent subset {x1,x2,...,xr} in G.Furthermore,it is shown that the lower bound on the condition|NG(x1)∪NG(x2)∪···∪NG(xr)|≥bn+ak/a+b is best possible in some sense,and it is an extension of Lu's previous result.     

Cycle-saturated graphs of minimum size

A graph G is called C_k-saturated if G contains no cycles of length k but does contain such a cycle after the addition of any new edge. Bounds are obtained for the minimum number of edges in C_k-saturated graphs for all k ≠ 8 or 10 and n sufficiently large. In general, it is shown that the minimum is between n + c₁n/k and n + c₂n/k for some positive constants c₁ and C₂. Our results provide an asymptotic solution to a 15-year-old problem of Bollobás.     

The symmetric (2k,k)‐graphs

A noncomplete graph G is called an (n, k)‐graph if it is n‐connected and G − X is not (n − |X| + 1)‐connected for any X ⊆ V(G) with |X| ≤ k. Mader conjectured that for k ≥ 3 the graph K_{2k + 2} − (1‐factor) is the unique (2k, k)‐graph. We settle this conjecture for strongly regular graphs, for edge transitive graphs, and for vertex transitive graphs. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 35–51, 2001     

On integral sum graphs with a saturated vertex

As introduced by F.Harary in 1994, a graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its vertices can be given a labeling f with distinct integers so that for any two distinct vertices u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v) = f(w) for some vertex w in G.     

Total domination changing and stable graphs upon vertex removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination vertex removal stable if the removal of an arbitrary vertex leaves the total domination number unchanged. On the other hand, a graph is total domination vertex removal changing if the removal of an arbitrary vertex changes the total domination number. In this paper, we study total domination vertex removal changing and stable graphs.     

On graphs critical with respect to vertex partition numbers

For k?0, ?_k(G) denotes the Lick-White vertex partition number of G. A graph G is called (n, k)-critical if it is connected and for each edge e of G?_k(G–e)<?_k(G)=n. We describe all (2, k)-critical graphs and for n?3,k?1 we extend and simplify a result of Bollobás and Harary giving one construction of a family of (n, k)-critical graphs of every possible order.     

On K s -free subgraphs in K s+k -free graphs and vertex Folkman numbers

Extending the problem of determining Ramsey numbers Erdős and Rogers introduced the following function. For given integers 2 ≤ s < t let f _s,t (n) = min{max{|S|: S ⊆ V (H) and H[S] contains no K _s }}, where the minimum is taken over all K _t -free graphs H of order n. This function attracted a considerable amount of attention but despite that, the gap between the lower and upper bounds is still fairly wide. For example, when t=s+1, the best bounds have been of the form Ω(n ^1/2+o(1)) ≤ f _s,s+1(n) ≤ O(n ^1−ɛ(s)), where ɛ(s) tends to zero as s tends to infinity. In this paper we improve the upper bound by showing that f _s,s+1(n) ≤ O(n ^2/3). Moreover, we show that for every ɛ > 0 and sufficiently large integers 1 ≪ k ≪ s, Ω(n ^1/2−ɛ ) ≤ f _s,s+k (n) ≤ O(n ^1/2+ɛ . In addition, we also discuss some connections between the function f _s,t and vertex Folkman numbers.