Copolymerization and Copolymers of 2,4,5-Tribromostyrene with Styrene and Acrylonitrile

Abstract

2,4,5-Tribromostyrene (TBSt) was copolymerized with styrene (St) or acrylonitrile (AN) in toluene solution using 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile as free radical initiator. The copolymerization reactivity ratios were found to be for the system TBSt/St r ₁ = 1.035 ± 0.164 (TBSt) and r ₂ = 0.150 ± 0.057 (St), and for the system TBSt/AN r ₁ = 2.445 ± 0.270 (TBSt) and r ₂ = 0.133 ± 0.054 (AN). The e and Q values were also calculated. The initial copolymerization rate, R _p, for both systems linearly increases as the content of TBSt in the monomer mixture increases. However, these values are somewhat higher when AN was used as a comonomer. A similar behavior has also been established for the course of the copolymerization reactions to high conversion. The resulting copolymers and TBSt-homopolymer show similar thermal stabilities of polystyrene. However, the glass transition temperature increases markedly with increasing TBSt content.     

Copolymerization of 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione with p-chlorostyrene and vinylidene chloride

The copolymerization of 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione (M₂) with p-chlorostyrene and vinylidene chloride is reported. The copolymers were prepared in sealed tubes under nitrogen with azobisisobutyronitrile initiator. Infrared absorption bands at 1580 cm.^?1 revealed the presence of a highly enolic β-diketone and indicated that copolymerization had occurred. The copolymer compositions were determined from the chlorine analyses and the reactivity ratios were evaluated. The copolymerization with p-chlorostyrene (M₁) was highly alternating and provided the reactivity ratios r₁ = 0.32 ± 0.06, r₂ = 0.02 ± 0.01. Copolymerization with vinylidene chloride (M₁) afforded the reactivity ratios r₁ = 2.4 ± 0.6, r₂ = 0.15 ± 0.05. The Q and e values for the dione (Q = 0.13, e = 1.37), as evaluated from the results of the vinylidene chloride case, agree closely with the previously reported results of copolymerization with methyl methacrylate and acrylonitrile and confirm the general low reactivity of 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione in nonalternating systems.     

Inverse emulsion polymerization of acrylamide. II. Synthesis and characterization of copolymers with methacrylic acid

Inverse emulsion copolymerization studies of acrylamide (Am) with methacrylic acid (MAA) are reported. Aqueous monomer solutions were emulsified in toluene with a blend of two surfactants (sorbitan sesquioleate and C18-terminated acrylamide oligomers). Polymerization kinetics in presence of an oil-soluble initiator (AIBN) were determined at 40°C as a function of methacrylic acid content and aqueous-phase pH. Polymerization rates were found to be faster at basic pH than at acidic pH, which appeared to be related to the actual concentration of methacrylic acid in the aqueous phase. Monomer reactivity ratios have been derived as r_A-M = 0.58 ± 0.02 and r_M-A = 4.0 ± 0.10 at pH 4, r_A-M = 0.56 ± 0.005 and r_M-A = 0.15 ± 0.03 at pH 10. These differences were found to have an effect on the molecular characteristics of the copolymers. Initial emulsions and final inverse latexes displayed the same broad size distribution; under basic pH the particle size is relatively insensitive to the ionic comonomer concentration. Poor latex stability is characteristic of copolymer latexes prepared under acidic conditions. Based on these experimental results, some aspects of the polymerization mechanism are discussed.     

Determination of the reactivity ratios of methyl acrylate with the vinyl acetate,vinyl 2,2-dimethyl-propanoate,and vinyl 2-ethylhexanoate

The course of composition drift in copolymerization reactions is determined by reactivity ratios of the contributing monomers. Since polymer properties are directly correlated with the resulting chemical composition distribution, reactivity ratios are of paramount importance. Furthermore, obtaining correct reactivity ratios is a prerequisite for good model predictions. For vinyl acetate (VAc), vinyl 2,2-dimethyl-propanoate also known as vinyl pivalate (VPV), and vinyl 2-ethylhexanoate (V2EH), the reactivity ratios with methyl acrylate (MA) have been determined by means of low conversion bulk polymerization. The mol fraction of MA in the resulting copolymer was determined by ¹H-NMR. Nonlinear optimization on the thus-obtained monomer feed–copolymer composition data resulted in the following sets of reactivity ratios: r_MA = 6.9 ± 1.4 and r_VAc = 0.013 ± 0.02; r_MA = 5.5 ± 1.2 and r_VPV = 0.017 ± 0.035; r_MA = 6.9 ± 2.7 and r_V2EH = 0.093 ± 0.23. As a result of the similar and overlapping reactivity data of the three methyl acrylate–vinyl ester monomer systems, for practical puposes these data can be described with one set of reactivity data. Nonlinear optimization of all monomer feed–copolymer composition data together resulted in r_MA = 6.1 ± 0.6 and r_VEst = 0.0087 ± 0.023. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Copolymerization of 3,4-dimethyltetrahydrofuran with cyclic ethers

The copolymerization of 3,4-dimethyltetrahydrofuran with selected cyclic ethers was studied. Although 3,4-dimethyltetrahydrofuran did not homopolymerize, it readily copolymerized with propylene oxide and epichlorohydrin in an alternating fashion using the cationic initiator PF₅. The reactivity ratios r₁ and r₂ for the copolymerization of 3, 4-dimethyltetrahydrofuran and epichlorohydrin were r₁ = 0.22 ± 0.05 and r₂ = 0.11 ± 0.01, respectively.     

Copolymerization of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate

Copolymers of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate, (SEM) were prepared with ethyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, vinylidene chloride, and styrene in 1,2-dimethoxyethane solution with N,N′-azobisisobutyronitrile as initiator. The monomer reactivity ratios with SEM (M₁) were: vinylidene chloride, r₁ = 3.6 ± 0.5, r₂ = 0.22 ± 0.03; ethyl acrylate, r₁ = 3.2 ± 0.6, r₂ = 0.30 ± 0.05; ethyl methacrylate, r₁ = 2.0 ± 0.4, r₂ = 1.0 ± 0.1; styrene, r₁ = 0.6 ± 0.2, r₂ = 0.37 ± 0.03. The values of the copolymerization parameters calculated from the monomer reactivity ratios were e = +0.6 and Q = 1.4. Comparison of the monomer reactivities indicates that SEM is similar to ethyl methacrylate with regard to copolymerization reactivity in 1,2-dimethoxyethane solution. The sodium salt of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate, SEM^?Na^⊕, was copolymerized with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (M₂) in water solution. Reactivity ratios of r₁ = 0.7 ± 0.1 and r₂ = 1.6 ± 0.1 were obtained, indicating a lower reactivity of SEM^?Na^⊕ in water as compared to SEM in 1,2-dimethoxyethane. This decreased reactivity was attributed to greater ionic repulsion between reacting species in the aqueous medium.     

Copolymerization of isopropenyl and isopropylidene oxazolones with styrene

2-Isopropenyl-4-isopropyl-2-oxazolin-5-one (M₂), was copolymerized with styrene (M₁), and the monomer reactivity ratios were determined to be r₁ = 0.31 ± 0.03, r₂ = 1.12 ± 0.10. New isomerized oxazolones (M₂), 2-isopropylidene-4-methyl-3-oxazolin-5-one, 2-isopropylidene-4-isopropyl-3-oxazolin-5-one, and 2-isopropylidene-4-isobutyl-3-oxazolin-5-one were prepared and copolymerized with styrene. The monomer reactivity ratios were: r₁ = 0.36 = 0.07, r₂ = 0.0; r₁ = 0.39 ± 0.06, r₂ = 0.00 ± 0.10; r₁ = 0.39 ± 0.10, r₂ = 0.0, respectively. The isomerized oxazolones showed no tendency towards homopolymerization by radical initiator. From the results of infrared and NMR spectra and hydrolysis of the copolymer, it was indicated that the isomerized oxazolones participated in copolymerization in the form of 1–4 polymerization of the conjugated dienes (exo double bond at C₂ and the C?N in the ring). Copolymers reacted with nucleophilic reagents such as amines and alcohols.     

Synthesis of Graft Polymers by Copolymerization of Macromonomers. II. Copolymerization Kinetics of Styrene-and Methacrylate-Terminatedpoly(2-Acetoxyethyl Methacrylate) Macromonomers

Styrene-terminated poly(2-acetoxyethyl methacrylate) macromonomer (EBA), methacrylate-terminated poly(2-acetoxyethyl methacrylate) macromonomer (MPA), and methacrylate-terminated poly(methyl methacrylate) macromonomer (MPM) were synthesized and subjected to polymerization and copolymerization by a free-radical polymerization initiator (AIBN). EBA and MPA were homopolymerized at various concentrations. EBA exhibited higher reactivity than styrene. The reactivity of MPA, however, was almost equal to that of glycidyl methacrylate. Cumulative copolymer compositions were determined by GPC analysis of copolymerization products. The reactivity ratios estimated were r_a = 0.95 and r_b , = 0.90 for EBA macromonomer (a)-methyl methacrylate (b) copolymerization. These values were not consistent with literature values for the styrene-methyl methacrylate and p-methoxy-styrene-methyl methacrylate systems. The reactivity ratios estimated for MPA and 2-bromoethyl methacrylate were r_a - 0.95 and r_b , = 0.98; equal to the glycidyl methacrylate-2-bromoethyl methacrylate system. MPA or MPM was also copolymerized with styrene, and the reactivity ratios were r_a = 0.40, r_a = 0.60 and r_a = 0.39, r_a = 0.58, respectively. These estimates were in good agreement with the reactivity ratios for glycidyl methacrylate and styrene. Thus, no effect of molecular weight was observed for both copolymerization systems.     

Copolymerization of new pyrazolone-containing monomers with certain vinyl comonomers

The polymerization ability of two new pyrazolone-containing monomers—3-methyl-1-phenyl-4-crotonoyl-pyrazolone-5 ( Cr ) and 3-methyl-1-phenyl-4-(3′-phenyl-acryloyl) pyrazolone-5 ( Cy )—was investigated. The monomers were obtained by acylation of 3-methyl-1-phenyl-pyrazolone-5 with crotonyl chloride or cinnamoyl chloride, respectively. It was established that the two monomers do not homopolymerize either under the action of ionic and radical initiators nor with γ-rays (doses between 2 and 10 MRad). In contrast to this, the two monomers copolymerize with other vinyl comonomers. Copolymers of Cr and Cy with methacrylic acid (MAA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and Styrene (St) were synthesized by radical copolymerization. The molecular weights of the polymer products obtained were in the 10,000–65,000 range. It was established that the molecular weight characteristics of the copolymers were affected by the concentration of the pyrazolone-containing monomer and by the chemical nature of the solvent used. The copolymerization of Cr and Cy with MAA was investigated in detail in order to evaluate the relative activity of the new monomers during copolymerization. The reactivity ratios (r) were calculated by three different methods with good agreement. The values obtained for the monomer pairs are: r_MAA = 0.61 ± 0.01, r_Cr = 0.04 ± 0.01; r_MAA = 0.64 ± 0.05, r_Cy = 0.02 ± 0.02. The Q/e values for Cr and Cy were determined using the reactivity ratios of both monomers.     

Polymerization of meta-naphthoquinone methide: 3,4-benzo-6-methylenebicyclo [3.1.0] hex-3-ene-2-one

Polymerization behavior of meta-naphthoquinone methide, 3,4-benzo-6-methylenebicyclo[3.1.0]hex-3-ene-2-one ( 1 ), was studied. Radical initiator 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) induced polymerization of 1 , but ionic initiators potassium tert-butoxide, butyllithium, and boron trifluoride etherate did not. Polymerization of 1 proceeded via ring-opening and aromatization to give a polymer with head-to-tail monomer unit placement. Compound 1 copolymerized with methyl methacrylate (MMA) in the presence of AIBN to obtain the monomer reactivity ratios r₁ ( 1 ) = 0.28 ± 0.07 and r₂(MMA) = 0.39 ± 0.02 at 60°C and Q and e values of Q = 1.04 and e = −1.03, indicating that 1 is a conjugative and electron-donating monomer. Ring-opening and aromatization of 1 also took place in the copolymerization. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 35: 741–746, 1997     

Copolymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate. Reactivity ratios from conversion–composition data

A method for the determination of reactivity ratios from conversion–composition data has been outlined. The conversion–composition changes during the copolymerization of styrene (M₁) and methyl methacrylate (M₂) have been studied at 60°C. By a method of graphical intersection, the integrated form of Skeist's equation has been used to determine the reactivity ratios (r₁ = 0.54 ± 0.02 and r₂ = 0.50 ± 0.06) in reasonably good agreement with values reported in the literature. The area of intersection was used as a measure of the precision of the data.     

Radical copolymerization of acrylonitrile with 2,2,2‐trifluoroethyl acrylate for dielectric materials: Structure and characterization

Radical copolymerization based on acrylonitrile (AN) and 2,2,2‐Trifluoroethyl acrylate (ATRIF) initited by AIBN was investigated in acetonitrile solution. The resulting poly(AN‐co‐ATRIF) copolymers were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁹F NMR and IR spectroscopy, and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Their compositions were assessed by ¹H NMR. The kinetics of radical copolymerization of AN with ATRIF was investigated from sereval experiments achieved at 70 °C from initial [AN]₀/[ATRIF]₀ molar ratios ranging between 20/80 and 80/20 and was enabled to determine the reactivity ratios of both comonomers. From the monomer—polymer copolymerization curve, the Fineman–Ross and Kelen–Tüdos laws enabled to assess the reactivity ratios (r_AN= r₁ = 1.25 ± 0.04 and r_ATRIF = r₂ = 0.93 ± 0.05 at 70 °C) while the revised patterns scheme led to r₁₂ = r_AN = 1.03, and r₂₁ = r_ATRIF = 0.78 at 70 °C. In all cases, r_AN x r_ATRIF product was close to unity, which indicates that poly(AN‐co‐ATRIF) copolymers exhibit a random structure. This was also confirmed by the Igarashi's and Pyun's laws which revealed the presence of AN‐ATRIF, AN‐AN, and ATRIF‐ATRIF dyads. The Q and e values for ATRIF were also assessed (Q₂ = 0.62 and e₂ = 0.93). The glass transition temperature values, T_g, of these copolymers increased from 17 to 61 °C as the molar percentage of ATRIF decreased from 77 to 16% in the copolymer. Thermogravimetry analysis of poly(AN‐co‐ATRIF) copolymers showed a good thermal stability compared to that of poly(ATRIF) homopolymer due to incorporation of AN comonomer. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013 , 51, 3856–3866     

Monomer reactivity ratio and Q–e values for copolymerization of hydroxyalkyl acrylates and 2-(1-aziridinyl)ethyl methacrylate with styrene

Copolymers of 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxypropyl acrylate, and 2(1-aziridinyl)-ethyl methacrylate (M₂) with styrene (M₁) were prepared in benzene solution at 60°C. Benzoyl peroxide, 0.1–0.2 mole-%, was used as initiator. Copolymer samples with the molar concentrations of M₂ feed ranging from 0.10 to 0.85 were used to determine the reactivity ratios. Elemental analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) were used to determine copolymer compositions. There was a solubility problem when the latter technique was applied. When samples which were completely soluble were analyzed, the results obtained from NMR and elemental analysis were in excellent agreement. The monomer reactivity ratios and the corresponding parameters for the copolymerization of (M₁) with 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate are: r₁ = 0.38 ± 0.02, r₂ = 0.34 ± 0.03; Q₂ = 0.85, e₂ = 0.64; with hydroxypropyl acrylate are: r₁ = 0.45 ± 0.03, r₂ = 0.36 ± 0.03; Q₂ = 0.75, e₂ = 0.56; with 2(1-aziridinyl)ethyl methacrylate are: r₁ = 0.53 ± 0.02, r₂ = 0.63 ± 0.04; Q₂ = 0.82, e₂ = 0.25.     

Aminobutadienes. X. Polymerization and copolymerization of 2-phthalimidomethyl-1,3-butadiene

The polymerization and copolymerization of 2-phthalimidomethyl-1,3-butadiene were investigated. This monomer was easily polymerized by benzoyl peroxide catalyst in bulk or in solvent, and by γ-radiation in the solid state to give polymers having a softening point of 135–145°C. Although these resulting polymers did not give x-ray diffraction patterns, they showed crystalline patterns by electron diffraction. On the other hand, cationic polymerization with the use of boron trifluoride diethyl etherate in chloroform was attempted, but no formation of the polymer was observed. Also, this monomer was easily copolymerized with styrene in N,N-dimethylformamide. The monomer reactivity ratios and Alfrey-Price Q and e values calculated from the copolymerization data of this monomer (M₁) with styrene (M₂) were r₁ = 2.0 ± 0.13, r₂ = 0.15 ± 0.02, and Q₁ = 2.78, e₁ = 0.30.     

Polymerization behaviour of 2,5-dimethylene- 2,5-dihydrofuran

Spontaneous homopolymerization of 2,5-dimethylene-2,5-dihydrofuran (DDF) was studied. The polymerization rates in two different initial monomer concentrations of DDF were analyzed with the first-order and second-order kinetics, and the homopolymerization of DDF was found to obey the first-order kinetics. The Arrhenius plot of the apparent rate constants at 30, 40, 50, and 60° gave an overall activation energy of 68.0 kJ/mol for the polymerization of DDF. From the comparison of the apparent rate constants at –78° and the time (the so-called half-life time) to decrease in half the monomer concentration for DDF with the corresponding values for p-xylylene (QM), DDF was found to be a less reactive monomer than QM. The copolymerizations of DDF with vinyl monomers such as acrylonitrile (AN), α-chloroacrylonitrile (CIAN), diethyl fumarate (DEF), and fumaronitrile (FN) were carried out in chloroform at 50° in the presence of AIBN to obtain the monomer reactivity ratios r₁(DDF) = 30.0 ± 3.0 and r₂ (AN) = 0 for the DDF-AN system, r₁ (DDF) = 1.55 ± 0.2 and r₂(CIAN) = 0 for the DDF-CIAN system, r₁(DDF) = 3.88 ± 0.2 and r₂(DEF) = 0 for the DDF-DEF system, and r₁(DDF) = 2.41 ± 0.1 and r₂ (FN) = 0 for the DDF-FN system, respectively. As the monomer reactivity ratios of r₂ for all systems were zero, Q and e values of DDF were calculated from the combination of two r₁ (DDF) values of any two copolymerization systems to be the 7.64 to 6.63 ×10²¹ range for Q and the –0.70 to –6.31 range for e, indicating that DDF is a highly conjugative and electron-donating monomer. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Synthesis and polymerization of 5‐(methacrylamido)tetrazole,a water‐soluble acidic monomer

The reaction of methacryloyl chloride with 5‐aminotetrazole gave the polymerizable methacrylamide derivative 5‐(methacrylamido)tetrazole ( 4 ) in one step. The monomer had an acidic tetrazole group with a pK_a value of 4.50 ± 0.01 in water methanol (2:1). Radical polymerization proceeded smoothly in dimethyl formamide or, after the conversion of monomer 4 into sodium salt 4‐Na , even in water. A superabsorbent polymer gel was obtained by the copolymerization of 4‐Na and 0.08 mol % N,N′‐methylenebisacrylamide. Its water absorbency was about 200 g of water/g of polymer, although the extractable sol content of the gel turned out to be high. The consumption of 4‐Na and acrylamide (as a model compound for the crosslinker) during a radical polymerization at 57 °C in D₂O was followed by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. Fitting the changes in the monomer concentration to the integrated form of the copolymerization equation gave the reactivity ratios r _4‐Na = 1.10 ± 0.05 and r_acrylamide = 0.45 ± 0.02, which did not differ much from those of an ideal copolymerization. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 4333–4343, 2002     

Initiator effect on the cationic ring‐opening copolymerization of 2‐ethyl‐2‐oxazoline and 2‐phenyl‐2‐oxazoline

The aim of this research was to study the effect of the initiator on the resulting monomer distribution for the cationic ring‐opening copolymerization of 2‐ethyl‐2‐oxazoline (EtOx) and 2‐phenyl‐2‐oxazoline (PhOx). At first, kinetic studies were performed for the homopolymerizations of both monomers at 160 °C under microwave irradiation using four initiators. These initiators have the same benzyl‐initiating group but different leaving groups, Cl^?, Br^?, I^?, and OTs^?. The basicity of the leaving group affects the ratio of covalent and cationic propagating species and, thus, the polymerization rate. The observed differences in polymerization rates could be correlated to the concentration of cationic species in the polymerization mixture as determined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. In a next‐step, polymerization kinetics were determined for the copolymerizations of EtOx and PhOx with these four initiators. The reactivity ratios for these copolymerizations were calculated from the polymerization rates obtained for the copolymerizations. This approach allows more accurate determination of the copolymerization parameters compared to conventional methods using the composition of single polymers. When benzyl chloride (BCl) was used as an initiator, no copolymers could be obtained because its reactivity is too low for the polymerization of PhOx. With decreasing basicity of the used counterions (Br^? > I^? > OTs^?), the reactivity ratios gradually changed from r_EtOx = 10.1 and r_PhOx = 0.30 to r_EtOx = 7.9 and r_PhOx = 0.18. However, the large difference in reactivity ratios will lead to the formation of quasi‐diblock copolymers in all cases. In conclusion, the used initiator does influence the monomer distribution in the copolymers, but for the investigated system the differences were so small that no difference in the resulting polymer properties is expected. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 4804–4816, 2008     

Controllability of radical copolymerization of maleimide and ethyl α‐(n‐propyl)acrylate using 1,1,2,2‐tetraphenyl‐1,2‐bis(trimethylsilyloxy) ethane as initiator

The radical copolymerization of maleimide (MI) and ethyl α‐propylacrylate was performed using 1,1,2,2‐tetraphenyl‐1,2‐bis(trimethylsilyloxy) ethane (TPSE) as initiator. The whole copolymerization process might be divided into two stages: in the first stage, the copolymerization was carried out on the common radical mechanism, the molecular weight of the copolymer increased rapidly in much lower conversion (< 85%), and did not depend on the polymerization time and conversion; in the second stage, molecular weight of the copolymer increased linearly with the conversion and the polymerization time. It was found, however, when the conversion was higher than a certain value, for example, more than 36%, the molecular weight of the copolymer was nearly unchangeable with the polymerization time and the molecular weight distribution was widened. The effect of reaction conditions on copolymerization was discussed and the reactivity ratios were calculated by the Kelen–Tudos method, the values were r_MI = 0.13 ± 0.03, r_EPA = 0.58 ± 0.06 for TPSE system and r_MI = 0.12 ± 0.03, r_EPA = 0.52 ± 0.06 for AIBN system. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 2872–2878, 2000     

Kinetic Studies on the Copolymerization of Acrylonitrile and Itaconic Acid in Dimethylsulfoxide

The free radical copolymerization of acrylonitrile (AN) with itaconic acid (IA) in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) initiated by azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) has been found to be chemically controlled even at high conversion. In order to explain this specific finding by Walling's kinetic model, a detailed study on the monomer reactivity ratios (MMRs), decomposition kinetics of AIBN and homopolymerization kinetics of AN was carried out in DMSO from 50 to 80°C. The results suggest that the reactivity ratio of IA is less than unity and always larger than that of AN. Thus, the reaction has an ideal copolymerization behavior when the temperature is increased. It is also found that decomposition of AIBN in DMSO is strictly first order and the decomposition rate constants (k _d) determined by nitrogen evolution technique are acceptable. k_p /k ^0.5 _t ratios of AN were estimated from the off-line conversion data under various monomer and initiator concentration. Additionally, the temperature dependences on MRRs, k _d and k_p /k ^0.5 _t were believed to follow the Arrhenius's law very well.     

Copolymerization of glycidyl methacrylate with alkyl acrylate monomers

A newer approach to obtaining acrylic thermoset polymers with adequate hydrophilicity required for various specific end uses is reported. Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was copolymerized with n-butyl acrylate (n-BA), isobutyl acrylate (i-BA), and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (2-EHA) in bulk at 60°C. with benzoyl peroxide as free radical initiator. The copolymer composition was determined from the estimation of epoxy group. Reactivity ratios were calculated by the Yezrielev, Brokhina, and Roskin method. For copolymerization of GMA (M₁) with n-BA (M₂) the reactivity ratios were r₁ = 2.15 ± 0.14, r₂ = 0.12 ± 0.03; with i-BA (M₂) they were r₁ = 1.27 ± 0.06, r₂ = 0.33 ± 0.031; and with 2-EHA (M₂) they were r₁ = 2.32 ± 0.14, r₂ = 0.13 ± 0.009. The reactivity ratios were the measure of distribution of monomer units in a copolymer chain; the values obtained are compared and discussed.