Hydrophobic ionic liquid‐based ultrasound‐assisted extraction of magnolol and honokiol from cortex Magnoliae officinalis

The hydrophobic ionic liquid of [BMIM][PF₆] was successfully used for the ultrasound‐assisted extraction of hydrophobic magnolol and honokiol from cortex Magnoliae officinalis. To obtain the best extraction efficiencies, some ultrasonic parameters including the concentration of [BMIM][PF₆], pH, ultrasonic power and ultrasonic time were evaluated. The results obtained indicated that the [BMIM][PF₆]‐based ultrasound‐assisted extraction efficiencies of magnolol and honokiol were greater than those of the [BMIM][BF₄]‐based ultrasound‐assisted extraction (from 48.6 to 45.9%) and the traditional ethanol reflux extraction (from 16.2 to 13.3%). Furthermore, the proposed extraction method is validated by the recovery, correlation coefficient (R²) and reproducibility (RSD, n=5), which were 90.8–102.6, 0.9992–0.9998, and 1.6–5.4%, respectively.     

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Soyasaponins from Hypocotyls, and Analysis by LC-ESI-MS

A rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method with electrospray mass spectrometric detection has been developed for determination of soyasaponins in hypocotyls. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was used to prepare the sample, because it was simpler and more effective than conventional extraction methods for extraction of soyasaponins from soybean hypocotyls using methanol, ethanol, or acetonitrile as solvents. Maximum yields of total or individual soyasaponins extracted by UAE were highly dependent on the extraction solvent and on the operating conditions. The maximum amount of total soyasaponins was extracted by use of 40% ethanol in water. The effects of extraction temperature and time were also investigated, and the stability of soyasaponins during UAE was examined. Soyasaponins could be extracted without decomposition from soybean hypocotyls by three-fold UAE with 40% ethanol at 25 °C for 20 min. The calibration plot was linear (r ² > 0.991) in the concentration range 0.01–1.0 mg L^?1 for each soyasaponin, with a lower limit of quantification less than 4.0 ng m L^?1. Intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSD) were less than 9.2 and 13.1%, respectively. The method was applied to routine analysis of soyasaponins in hypocotyls.     

Pharmacokinetics of honokiol after intravenous guttae in beagle dogs assessed using ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

A simple, rapid and sensitive ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the determination of honokiol in beagle dog plasma after intravenous guttae. With addition of the internal standard magnolol, plasma samples were precipitated with methanol and separated on a Shim‐pack XR‐ODS II (2.0 × 100 mm, 2.2 µm) with isocratic elution of methanol and water (80:20) solution at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. A good separation of honokiol was achieved within 3.5 min. Quantification was performed on a Waters Quattro Premier XE triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization inlet in the negative multiple reaction monitoring mode. Good linearity was obtained over the concentration range of 5.12–15580 ng/mL (r² > 0.998). Intra‐ and inter‐day precisions were <13.10%, and accuracy ranged from 89.21 to 99.92%. The lower limit of quantification for honokiol was 5.12 ng/mL, and honokiol was stable under various conditions (three freeze–thaw cycles, short‐term temperature, post‐preparative and long‐term temperature conditions.). This validated method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of honokiol in dogs by intravenous guttae. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of honokiol and magnolol in rat plasma

A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method is described for the simultaneous determination of honokiol and magnolol in rat plasma. The plasma was deproteinized with acetonitrile which contained an internal standard (diphenyl) and was separated from the aqueous layer by adding sodium chloride. Honokiol and magnolol are extracted into the acetonitrile layer with high yield, and determined by reversed-phase HPLC and ultraviolet detection. The limits of quantitation for honokiol and magnolol were 13 and 25 ng ml⁻¹ in plasma, respectively, and recovery of both analytes was greater than 93%. The assay was linear from 20 to 200 ng ml⁻¹ for honokiol and from 40 to 400 ng ml⁻¹ for magnolol. Variation over the range of the standard curve was less than 15%. The method was used to determine the concentration-time profiles of honokiol and magnolol in the plasma following rectal administration of Houpo extract at a dose of 245 mg kg⁻¹, equivalent to 13.5, 24.4 mg kg⁻¹ of honokiol and magnolol, respectively.     

Application of Sol–Gel Based Poly(ethylene glycol)/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Coated Fiber for SPME of Methyl tert-Butyl Ether in Environmental Water Samples

In this research, the sol–gel technology was applied for the preparation of solid-phase microextraction fibers for extracting of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from environmental water samples. For this purpose, two different polymers such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and combination of PEG and multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were prepared using sol–gel technology as coating procedure for the fibers. The pre-concentration process followed by GC–FID determination was used and the results evidenced that pre-concentration factor for PEG/CNTs fiber was approximately five times higher than PEG. Parameters affecting the extraction efficiency such as temperature, extraction time, stirring speed and salt effect for each fiber were investigated and optimized. On the optimal conditions, the linear range for MTBE with PEG and PEG/CNT fibers were 10–3,000 and 1–1,000 ng mL^?1 and the detection limits (S/N = 3) were 1.0 and 0.3 ng mL^?1, respectively. The sol–gel PEG/CNTs fiber has good performance and therefore relatively better figures of merit and experimental results such as thermal stability (up to 320 °C), average of life time (over 150 times) and repeatability (RSD < 4) in comparison to conventional PDMS/Carboxen fiber, which was already reported for determination of MTBE.     

Sesquiterpene-neolignans from Manglietia hookeri

The comet assay-guided fractionation of the twigs of Manglietia hookeri resulted in the isolation of three sesquiterpene-neolignans, including a new one 5-allyl-2-(4-allyl-phenoxy)-3-[7-(1-hydroxy-1-methyl-ethyl)-1, 4a-dimethyl-decahydro-naphthalen-1-yloxy]-phenol (1), and eudesobovatol A (2) and eudesobovatol B (3), together with three lignans, obovatol (4), honokiol (5) and magnolol (6). Their structures were elucidated on the basis of spectral analysis and by comparison with related literature data. Compounds 1, 4–6 showed a protective effect on UV inductive DNA damage in mice lymphocyte cells, while compound 1 indicated the smallest Olive Tail Moment 7.34 ± 2.09 at 6 × 10^?6 μM.     

Multiwalled‐carbon‐nanotubes‐based matrix solid‐phase dispersion extraction coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography for the determination of honokiol and magnolol in Magnoliae Cortex

In this paper, multiwalled‐carbon‐nanotube‐based matrix solid‐phase dispersion coupled to HPLC with diode array detection was used to extract and determine honokiol and magnolol from Magnoliae Cortex. The extraction efficiency of the multiwalled‐carbon‐nanotube‐based matrix solid‐phase dispersion was studied and optimized as a function of the amount of dispersing sorbent, volume of elution solvent, and flow rate of elution solvent, with the aid of response surface methodology. An amount of 0.06 g of carboxyl‐modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes and 1.5 mL of methanol at a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min were selected. The method obtained good linearity (r² > 0.9992) and precision (RSD < 4.7%) for honokiol and magnolol, with limits of detection of 0.045 and 0.087 μg/mL, respectively. The recoveries obtained from analyzing in triplicate spiked samples were determined to be from 90.23 to 101.10% and the RSDs from 3.5 to 4.8%. The proposed method that required less samples and reagents was simpler and faster than Soxhlet and maceration extraction methods. The optimized method was applied for analyzing five real samples collected from different cultivated areas.     

Ionic Liquid-Based Ultrasonic/Microwave-Assisted Extraction Combined with UPLC for the Determination of Anthraquinones in Rhubarb

Ionic liquid-based ultrasonic/microwave-assisted extraction (IL-UMAE) of five anthraquinones (physcion, chrysophanol, emodin, rhein, and aloe-emodin) from rhubarb was first studied. Several parameters of UMAE were optimized, and the results were compared with of the heat-reflux extraction (HRE), ultrasound, and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE and UAE). The optimal UMAE conditions were as follows: the solvent was 2.0 mol L^?1 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide [bmim]Br solution, the ration of solid/liquid (g mL^?1) was 1:15, time was 2 min, and microwave power was 500 W. Under these UMAE conditions, total content of five anthraquinones was 28.00 mg g^?1. Compared with the conventional HRE, regular MAE and UAE techniques, the proposed approach exhibited higher efficiency (18.90?C24.40% enhanced) and shorter extraction time (from 6 h to 2 min). The anthraquinones were then determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). Based on optimized conditions, contents of physcion, chrysophanol, emodin, rhein and aloe-emodin in rhubarb collected from different cultivated areas were 0.68?C2.99, 5.03?C15.40, 0.48?C4.34, 0.025?C3.93 and 0.26?C2.56 mg g^?1, respectively. This study suggests that IL-UMAE was an efficient, rapid, simple and green preparation technique.     

Determination of BTEX Compounds by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction with GC–FID

Rapid, inexpensive, and efficient sample-preparation by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) then gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC–FID) have been used for extraction and analysis of BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) in water samples. In this extraction method, a mixture of 25.0 μL carbon disulfide (extraction solvent) and 1.00 mL acetonitrile (disperser solvent) is rapidly injected, by means of a syringe, into a 5.00-mL water sample in a conical test tube. A cloudy solution is formed by dispersion of fine droplets of carbon disulfide in the sample solution. During subsequent centrifugation (5,000 rpm for 2.0 min) the fine droplets of carbon disulfide settle at the bottom of the tube. The effect of several conditions (type and volume of disperser solvent, type of extraction solvent, extraction time, etc.) on the performance of the sample-preparation step was carefully evaluated. Under the optimum conditions the enrichment factors and extraction recoveries were high, and ranged from 122–311 to 24.5–66.7%, respectively. A good linear range (0.2–100 μg L⁻¹, i.e., three orders of magnitude; r ² = 0.9991–0.9999) and good limits of detection (0.1–0.2 μg L⁻¹) were obtained for most of the analytes. Relative standard deviations (RSD, %) for analysis of 5.0 μg L⁻¹ BTEX compounds in water were in the range 0.9–6.4% (n = 5). Relative recovery from well and wastewater at spiked levels of 5.0 μg L⁻¹ was 89–101% and 76–98%, respectively. Finally, the method was successfully used for preconcentration and analysis of BTEX compounds in different real water samples.

     

Determination of Protoberberine Alkaloids in Coptis chinensis by Microextraction and High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Sample preparation technique based on an organic filter membrane (pH-resolved filter membrane microextraction) (pH-RFMME) was developed, coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography, and used to determine protoberberine alkaloids (jatrorrhizine, epiberberine, coptisine, palmatine, and berberine) in Coptis chinensis at different pH values through a one-step procedure. This green procedure provides a desirable sample pretreatment technology. The main variables affecting the extraction such as filter membrane area (or volumes of extraction solvents), sample pH, eluent pH, ionic strength, extraction stirring rate, extraction time, and sample volume were optimized. Under the optimized conditions, the enrichment factors of the analytes were 40.4–52.0, the linear ranges were 3.2–6250 ng · mL^?1 for jatrorrhizine and epiberberine, 6.0–12000 ng · mL^?1 for coptisine, 1.8–3600 ng · mL^?1 for palmatine, and 18.8–18800 ng · mL^?1 for berberine, with r ² ≥ 0.9945. The limits of detection were less than 0.3 ng · mL^?1. Satisfactory recoveries (84.8%–115.5%) and precision (1.8%–10.0%) were also achieved. These results confirmed that pH-RFMME is a simple, rapid, practical, and environmentally friendly method to isolate analytes that exhibit significant differences in acidity or alkalinity from complex samples.     

三维荧光光谱结合二阶校正算法测定人体血浆和厚朴药材中的厚朴酚及和厚朴酚

利用三维荧光光谱与化学计量学二阶校正算法相结合, 直接测定人体血浆中和厚朴药材中的厚朴酚及和厚朴酚. 采用平行因子分析(PARAFAC)算法解析所得两种物质的回收率分别为(99.5±2.6)%和(90.2±1.8)%. 采用交替三线性分解(ATLD)算法解析, 当组分数N取3时, 回收率分别为(104.2±3.2)%和(98.7±4.0)%; 当N取4时, 回收率分别为(102.7±2.9)%和(99.0±4.6)%. 同时用该方法对厚朴药材中的厚朴酚及和厚朴酚进行快速定量测定, 结果令人满意. 实验结果表明, 此法可用于复杂试样中未知干扰共存下厚朴酚及和厚朴酚的同时测定.     

Gas chromatography–triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry for analysis of selected polyhalogenated pollutants in plants. Comparison of extraction methods

Different extraction methods, followed by gas chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry, were evaluated for simultaneous extraction of seven polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and six polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from common weeds. Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) with in-cell clean-up, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with in-column clean-up, and UAE with dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) clean-up were evaluated and compared. In-cell clean-up with 4 g Florisil and 0.5 g graphitized carbon black (GCB) and two extraction cycles of 10 min with n-hexane–ethyl acetate 80:20 (v/v) at 60 °C were used for the PLE procedure. UAE with in-column clean-up was conducted under conditions similar to those reported for the PLE method whereas in UAE with dSPE clean-up purification of the extract was performed after extraction using primary and secondary amine sorbent (PSA) and GCB. Recovery from 82 to 104 % was obtained for all the compounds by PLE whereas, in general, lower extraction efficiency was obtained by UAE with in-column clean-up (especially for BDE-17 and BDE-183, for which recovery was 70 and 41 %, respectively) and by UAE with dSPE clean-up, for which the main drawback is that BDE-183 cannot be extracted. Finally, PLE was used for analysis of PCBs and PBDEs in different plants (Lolium rigidum, Lactuca serriola, Malva sylvestris, and Verbascum thapsus) collected from residential and/or rural areas of Madrid (Spain). Several of the analyzed compounds were detected at low levels in these plants, but only PCB-153 could be quantified.

Three‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent as acceptor phase for extraction and preconcentration of main active compounds in a traditional Chinese medicinal formula

A three‐phase hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent as acceptor phase was developed and coupled with high‐performance capillary electrophoresis for the simultaneous extraction, enrichment, and determination of main active compounds (hesperidin, honokiol, shikonin, magnolol, emodin, and β,β′‐dimethylacrylshikonin) in a traditional Chinese medicinal formula. In this procedure, two hollow fibers, impregnated with n‐heptanol/n‐nonanol (7:3, v/v) mixture in wall pores as the extraction phase and a combination (9:1, v/v) of methyltrioctylammonium chloride/glycerol (1:3, n/n) and methanol in lumen as the acceptor phase, were immersed in the aqueous sample phase. The target analytes in the sample solution were first extracted through the organic phase, and further back‐extracted to the acceptor phase during the stirring process. Important extraction parameters such as types and composition of extraction solvent and deep eutectic solvent, sample phase pH, stirring rate, and extraction time were investigated and optimized. Under the optimal conditions, detection limits were 0.3–0.8 ng/mL with enrichment factors of 6–114 for the analytes and linearities of 0.001–13 μg/mL (r² ≥ 0.9901). The developed method was successfully applied to the simultaneous extraction and concentration of the main active compounds in a formula of Zi‐Cao‐Cheng‐Qi decoction with the major advantages of convenience, effectiveness, and environmentally friendliness.     

Polythiophene–Chitosan Magnetic Nanocomposite as a Novel Sorbent for Disperse Magnetic Solid Phase Extraction of Triazine Herbicides in Aquatic Media

In this paper, polythiophene/chitosan magnetic nanocomposite as a novel adsorbent is proposed for the preconcentration of triazines in aqueous samples prior to gas chromatography. The synthesized nanoparticles, magnetic chitosan and polythiophene–chitosan magnetic nanocomposite were characterized by scanning electron microscopy. The magnetic polythiophene–chitosan nanocomposite containing analytes could be removed from the sample solution by applying a permanent magnet. The major factors influencing the extraction efficiency including desorption conditions, nanocomposite components ratio, sorbent amount, extraction time, ionic strength and sample pH were optimized. The developed method proved to be rather convenient and offers sufficient sensitivity and good reproducibility. The limit of detection (S/N = 3) and limit of quantification (S/N = 10) of the method under optimized conditions were 10–30 and 100 ng L⁻¹, respectively. Under the optimum conditions, good linearity was obtained within the range of 100–5000 ng L⁻¹ for all triazines with correlation coefficients >0.9994. The relative standard deviation at a concentration level of 150 ng L⁻¹ was 7–12 %. Furthermore, the method was successfully applied to the determination of triazines in real samples, where relative recovery percentages of 96–102 % were obtained. Compared with other methods, the current method is characterized by easy, fast separation and low detection limits.

     

Separation and determination of honokiol and magnolol in herbal medicines by flow injection-capillary electrophoresis

A simple, rapid, and accurate method for the separation and determination of honokiol and magnolol in Magnolia officinalis and related herbal medicines was developed by combination of flow injection (FI) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). The analysis was carried out using an unmodified fused-silica capillary (50-μm I.D.; total length 7.5 cm; effective length 4.5 cm). A series of optimization steps afforded the following conditions: the sample solvent consisted of 150 mM NaOH and a running buffer composed of 10 mM sodium tetraborate/10 mM sodium dihydrogenphosphate (NaH₂PO₄) at pH 12 was applied for the separation of the analytes. The separation could be achieved within 5 min with a sample throughput rate of up to 28 h⁻¹. The repeatability (defined as the relative standard deviation, RSD) for honokiol and magnolol was 2.0% and 1.6% with peak area evaluation, 3.6% and 2.0% with peak height evaluation, and 2.0% and 1.4% with migration time evaluation, respectively. Regression equations revealed linear relationships (r = 0.9991–0.9998) between the peak area of each analyte and the concentration.     

Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Nitrophenols Using Supramolecular Solvent and Their Determination by HPLC with UV Detection

A novel, efficient, and environmentally friendly method—supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction (SMS-LLME) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)—was first established for the determination of p-nitrophenol and o-nitrophenol in water samples. Several important parameters influencing extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction solvent, pH of sample, temperature, salt effect, extraction time, and stirring rate, were optimized in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the enrichment factor was 166 for p-nitrophenol and 160 for o-nitrophenol, and the limits of detection by HPLC were 0.26 and 0.58 μg L⁻¹, respectively. Excellent linearity with coefficients of correlation from 0.9996 to 0.9997 was observed in the concentration range of 2–1,000 μg L⁻¹. The ranges of intra- and interday precision (n = 5) at 100 μg L⁻¹ of nitrophenols were 5.85–7.76 and 10.2–11.9 %, respectively. The SMS-LLME method was successfully applied for preconcentration of nitrophenols in environmental water samples.

     

Separation and determination of magnolol and honokiol inMagnolia officinalis bark by capillary zone electrophoresis

The effects of pH on separation parameters such as migration mobility, resolution, sensitivity, column efficiency and peak shape were emphatically studied. Better separation of magnolol and honokiol using capillary zone electrophoresis was achieved by optimizing pH in the range 5.0–11.7. The influences of applied voltage and temperature were also investigated. We adopted a better sample extraction procedure by which higher contents of honokiol and magnolol with sample compositions unchanged were obtained. The analysis was performed with direct UV detection using a 10 mM borate-10 mM phosphate buffer at pH of 11.6. The method was successfully applied to the simultaneous determination of magnolol and honokiol inMagnolia officinalis bark within 9 min.     

Rapid Determination of DDT and Its Metabolites in Environmental Water Samples with Mixed Ionic Liquids Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Prior to HPLC-UV

In this paper, a novel mixed ionic liquids-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method was developed for rapid enrichment and determination of environmental pollutants in water samples. In this method, two kinds of ionic liquids, hydrophobic ionic liquid and hydrophilic ionic liquid, were used as extraction solvent and disperser solvent, respectively. DDT and its metabolites were used as model analytes and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detector for the analysis. Factors that may affect the extraction recoveries, such as type and volume of extraction solvent (hydrophobic ionic liquid) and disperser solvent (hydrophilic ionic liquid), extraction time, sample pH and ionic strength, were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the linear range was 1–100 μg L⁻¹, limits of detection could reach 0.21–0.49 μg L⁻¹, and relative standard deviation was 6.01–8.48 % (n = 7) for the analytes. Satisfactory results were achieved when the method was applied to analyze the target pollutants in environmental water samples with spiked recoveries over the range of 85.7–106.8 %.

     

Bamboo Charcoal as Solid-Phase Extraction Adsorbent for the Determination of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Water Samples by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

In this paper, bamboo charcoal was successfully developed for the solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the determination of six organophosphorus pesticides in water samples. After the bamboo charcoal was pretreated and packed in the solid-phase extraction cartridge, the organophosphorus pesticides in water samples were carried out the solid-phase extraction. To establish a perfect solid-phase extraction procedure, the experimental conditions including the eluent, eluent volume, pH of the sample, flow rate of the sample, and loading volume of the sample were all investigated. When 100 mL water samples in the pH range of 6–7 were loaded with the flow rate of 2.5 mL · min^?1 and then eluted with 10 mL acetonitrile, the proposed extraction method was validated by the recovery, correlation coefficient (R²), repeatability (RSD, n = 7) and LODs, which were 69.6–93.4%, 0.9982–0.9998, 2.9–5.6%, and 0.08–1.04 µg · L^?1, respectively. Furthermore, the analysis of the tap, snow, and river water samples demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed SPE method for real water samples. Based on the aforementioned factors, it could be concluded that bamboo charcoal was a good solid-phase extraction adsorbent, and this proposed solid-phase extraction method was suitable for the effective enrichment and determination of the organophosphorus pesticides in water samples.     

Magnetic solid-phase extraction using Schiff base ligand supported on magnetic nanoparticles as sorbent combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the extraction of phenols from water samples

ABSTRACT

In this work, the magnetic sorbent was developed by covalent binding of a Schiff base ligand, N,N’-bis(3-salicyliden aminopropyl)amine (salpr), on the surface of silica coated magnetic nanoparticles (Salpr@SCMNPs). The core-shell nanoparticle was applied for the magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) of phenolic compounds from water samples prior to gas chromatography-flame ionisation detector (GC?FID). Characterisation of the Salpr@SCMNPs was performed with different physicochemical methods such as Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Variables affecting the performance of both extraction steps such as pH of the water sample, the sorbent amount, the desorption conditions, the extraction time; and extraction solvent were studied. Under the optimised conditions, the analytical performances were determined with a linear range of 0.01–100 ng mL^?1 and a limit of detection at 0.003–0.02 ng mL^?1 for all of the analytes studied. The intra-day (n = 5) and inter-day (n = 3) relative standard deviations (RSD%) of three replicates were each demonstrated in the range of 6.9–8.9% and 7.3–10.1%, respectively. The proposed method was executed for the analysis of real water samples, whereby recoveries in the range of 92.9–99.0% and RSD% lower than 6.1% were attained.