The Kujang sulhae 九章術解: Nam Pyoˇng-Gil’s reinterpretation of the mathematical methods of the Jiuzhang suanshu

In this article, a discussion and analysis is presented of the Kujang sulhae by Nam Pyoˇng-Gil (1820-1869), a 19th-century Korean commentary on the Jiuzhang suanshu. Nam copied the problems and procedures from the ancient Chinese classic, but replaced Liu Hui’s and Li Chunfeng’s commentaries with his own. In his postface Nam expressed his dissatisfaction with the earlier commentaries, because the approaches of Liu and Li did not match those of his contemporary readers well. This can be seen from the most important features of Nam’s commentary: the use of a synthesis of European and Chinese mathematical methods, easy explanations appealing to intuition, and disuse of the methods of infinitesimals and limits in Liu’s and Li’s commentaries. Based on his own postface and these features of his commentary, I believe that Nam Pyoˇng-Gil treated the Jiuzhang suanshu as a very important historical document, which he intended to explain according to the new mathematical canon in both Qing China and Chosoˇn Korea, the Shuli jingyun. Thus the Kujang sulhae is an example of the endeavor of 19th-century Korean mathematicians to reinterpret ancient Chinese mathematical texts with their contemporary knowledge.     

Une ambition éditoriale “universelle et confraternelle” : le bulletin bibliographique de L'Enseignement mathématique (1899–1920)

In 1899 Henri Fehr and Charles Laisant founded L'Enseignement mathématique (EM) with the ambition to involve teachers in the then-growing internationalization movement of mathematics. To this purpose, their editorial project gave an important place to a bibliographical bulletin reviewing periodicals which could be of interest for the world of mathematical education. This article is dedicated to the study of this bulletin, from its creation to the 1920s, and to the initiatives and choices that Laisant and Fehr made to carry out this internationalist editorial ambition, as well as to the limits and constraints of their project. During that time, many bibliographical initiatives for periodicals developed in the mathematical press, which can be considered as a first form of interaction between journals. Our study will concern initially the year 1899 and this interaction in which EM took part, dealing at first with the bulletin of EM, then, secondly, with the confrontation between bibliographical sections of other journals. Lastly, considering the first thirty years of the 20th century, we will study the different dynamics at work in the world of mathematical periodicals which the EM serves to depict.     

Force,deflection, and time: Proposition VI of Newton's Principia

In this extended study of Proposition VI, and its first corollary, in Book I of Newton's Principia, we clarify both the statements and the demonstrations of these fundamental results. We begin by tracing the evolution of this proposition and its corollary, to see how their texts may have changed from their initial versions. To prepare ourselves for some of the difficulties our study confronts, we then examine certain confusions which arise in two recent commentaries on Proposition VI. We go on to note other confusions, not in any particular commentary, but in Newton's demonstration and, especially, in his statement of the proposition. What, exactly, does Newton mean by a “body [that] revolves … about an immobile center”? By a “just-nascent arc”? By the “sagitta of the arc”? By the “centripetal force”? By “will be as”? We search for the mathematical meanings that Newton has in mind for these fragments of the Proposition VI statement, a search that takes us to earlier sections of the Principia and to discussions of the “method of first and last ratios,” centripetal force, and the second law of motion. The intended meaning of Proposition VI then emerges from the combined meanings of these fragments. Next we turn to the demonstration of Proposition VI, noting first that Newton's own argument could be more persuasive, before we construct a modern, more rigorous proof. This proof, however, is not as simple as one might expect, and the blame for this lies with the “sagitta of the arc,” Newton's measure of deflection in Proposition VI. Replacing the sagitta with a more natural measure of deflection, we obtain what we call Platonic Proposition VI, whose demonstration has a Platonic simplicity. Before ending our study, we examine the fundamental first corollary of Proposition VI. In his statement of this Corollary 1, Newton replaces the sagitta of Proposition VI by a not quite equal deflection from the tangent and the area swept out (which represents the time by Proposition I) by a not quite equal area of a triangle. These two approximations create small errors, but are these errors small enough? Do the errors introduced by these approximations tend to zero fast enough to justify these replacements? Newton must believe so, but he leaves this question unasked and unanswered, as have subsequent commentators on this crucial corollary. We end our study by asking and answering this basic question, which then allows us to give Corollary 1 a convincing demonstration.     

Varieties of wonder:: John Wilkins' mathematical magic and the perpetuity of invention

Akin to the mathematical recreations, John Wilkins' Mathematicall Magick ( 1648) elaborates the pleasant, useful and wondrous part of practical mathematics, dealing in particular with its material culture of machines and instruments. We contextualize the Mathematicall Magick by studying its institutional setting and its place within changing conceptions of art, nature, religion and mathematics. We devote special attention to the way Wilkins inscribes mechanical innovations within a discourse of wonder. Instead of treating ‘wonder’ as a monolithic category, we present a typology, showing that wonders were not only recreative, but were meant to inspire Wilkins' readers to new mathematical inventions.     

Meta-mathematical rhetoric: Hero and Ptolemy against the philosophers

Bringing the meta-mathematics of Hero of Alexandria and Claudius Ptolemy into conversation for the first time, I argue that they employ identical rhetorical strategies in the introductions to Hero's Belopoeica, Pneumatica, Metrica and Ptolemy's Almagest. They each adopt a paradigmatic argument, in which they criticize the discourses of philosophers and declare epistemological supremacy for mathematics by asserting that geometrical demonstration is indisputable. The rarity of this claim—in conjunction with the paradigmatic argument—indicates that Hero and Ptolemy participated in a single meta-mathematical tradition, which made available to them rhetoric designed to introduce, justify, and bolster the value of mathematics.     

A treatise on proportion in the tradition of Thomas Bradwardine: The De proportionibus libri duo (1528) of Jean Fernel

The famous French physician Jean Fernel published in 1528 in Paris the De proportionibus libri duo. This treatise belongs to the tradition of texts on proportion that follow Bradwardine?s Tractatus de proportionibus seu de proportionibus velocitatum in motibus (1328). In the first book, Fernel presented a theory of ratios that is traditional but contains some distinctive features, on denominating ratios, on fractions, on irrational ratios. The second book is devoted to a theory of ratio of ratios of which I give an account in this paper.     

The function of diorism in ancient Greek analysis

This paper is a contribution to our knowledge of Greek geometric analysis. In particular, we investigate the aspect of analysis know as diorism, which treats the conditions, arrangement, and totality of solutions to a given geometric problem, and we claim that diorism must be understood in a broader sense than historians of mathematics have generally admitted. In particular, we show that diorism was a type of mathematical investigation, not only of the limitation of a geometric solution, but also of the total number of solutions and of their arrangement. Because of the logical assumptions made in the analysis, the diorism was necessarily a separate investigation which could only be carried out after the analysis was complete.     

The Grand Astrologerʼs platform and ramp: Four problems in solid geometry from Wang Xiaotongʼs ‘Continuation of ancient mathematics’ (7th century AD)

Wang Xiaotong?s Jigu suanjing is primarily concerned with problems in solid and plane geometry leading to cubic equations which are to be solved numerically by the Chinese variant of Horner?s method. The problems in solid geometry give the volume of a solid and certain constraints on its dimensions, and the dimensions are required; we translate and analyze four of these. Three are solved using dissections, while one is solved using reasoning about calculations with very little recourse to geometrical considerations. The problems in Wang Xiaotong?s text cannot be seen as practical problems in themselves, but they introduce mathematical methods which would have been useful to administrators in organizing labor forces for public works.     

Mathematical tables in Ptolemy's Almagest

This paper is a discussion of Ptolemy's use of mathematical tables in the Almagest. By focusing on Ptolemy's mathematical practice and terminology, I argue that Ptolemy used tables as part of an organized group of units of text, which I call the table nexus. In the context of this deductive structure, tables function in the Almagest in much the same way as theorems in a canonical work, such as the Elements, both as means of presenting acquired knowledge and as tools for producing further knowledge.     

W.W. Rouse Ball and the mathematics of string figures

This article examines a chapter of the popular book Mathematical Recreations and Essays (5th to 9th editions) written by the Cambridge mathematician Walter William Rouse Ball (1850–1925). This chapter is devoted to “String Figures”, a procedural activity which consists in producing geometrical forms with a loop of string and which is carried out in many traditional societies throughout the world. By analyzing the way in which Ball selected some string figures within ethnographical publications and conceived the structure of this chapter, it appears that he implicitly brought to light the mathematical dimension of this practice.     

What Descartes knew of mathematics in 1628

The aim of this paper is to give an account of Descartes’ mathematical achievements in 1628–1629 using, as far as is possible, only contemporary documents, and in particular Beeckman’s Journal for October 1628. In the first part of the paper, I study the content of these documents, bringing to light the mathematical weaknesses they display. In the second part, I argue for the significance of these documents by comparing them with other independent sources, such as Descartes’ Regulae ad directionem ingenii. Finally, I outline the main consequences of this study for understanding the mathematical development of Descartes before and after 1629.     

Comparative analysis in Greek geometry

This article is a contribution to our knowledge of ancient Greek geometric analysis. We investigate a type of theoretic analysis, not previously recognized by scholars, in which the mathematician uses the techniques of ancient analysis to determine whether an assumed relation is greater than, equal to, or less than. In the course of this investigation, we argue that theoretic analysis has a different logical structure than problematic analysis, and hence should not be divided into Hankel’s four-part structure. We then make clear how a comparative analysis is related to, and different from, a standard theoretic analysis. We conclude with some arguments that the theoretic analyses in our texts, both comparative and standard, should be regarded as evidence for a body of heuristic techniques.     

The ovals in the Excerpta Mathematica and the origins of Descartes’ method of normals

The only occurrence of Descartes’ method of normals before La Géométrie (1637) is to be found in the Excerpta Mathematica. These mathematical fragments, published posthumously among others works in 1701, and dated by Tannery before 1629, deal with curves used in dioptrics which Descartes called ovals. I study in detail two of the texts on ovals together with the related texts in La Géométrie in order to shed light on the geometrical origins of Descartes’ method of normals.     

Some remarks on the meaning of equality in Diophantos’s Arithmetica

Diophantos in Arithmetica, without having defined previously any concept of “equality” or “equation,” employs a concept of the unknown number as a tool for solving problems and finds its value from an equality ad hoc created. In this paper we analyze Diophantos’s practices in the creation and simplification of such equalities, aiming to adduce more evidence on certain issues arising in recent historical research on the meaning of the “equation” in Diophantos’s work.     

Récréations et mathématiques mondaines au XVIII siècle: le cas de Guyot

In this paper, we study the most popular book of recreational mathematics published in the second half of the 18th century: The Nouvelles Récréations by Guyot. We indicate the motivations of the author, a simple postman, and the conditions which led him to write this book. We describe the spirit of the book and the public at which it aims. The success of the Nouvelles Récréations illustrates the rise of a science in polite society whose main goal is to amaze and amuse. Then, we examine the place of mathematics in this project and analyze the repertoire of problems and tricks. We focus on problems of combinatorics proposed by Guyot, like anagrams and card shuffles, which inspired some real mathematical work on the part of Monge and Gergonne.