Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

An existence theorem for antichains

Let k₁, k₂,…, k_n be given integers, 1 ? k₁ ? k₂ ? … ? k_n, and let S be the set of vectors x = (x₁,…, x_n) with integral coefficients satisfying 0 ? x_i ? k_i, i = 1, 2, 3,…, n. A subset H of S is an antichain (or Sperner family or clutter) if and only if for each pair of distinct vectors x and y in H the inequalities x_i ? y_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, do not all hold. Let |H| denote the number of vectors in H, let K = k₁ + k₂ + … + k_n and for 0 ? l ? K let (l)H denote the subset of H consisting of vectors h = (h₁, h₂,…, h_n) which satisfy h₁ + h₂ + … + h_n = l. In this paper we show that if H is an antichain in S, then there exists an antichain H′ in S for which |(l)H′| = 0 if $\text{l <}\text{K}\text{2}$, $\text{|(}\text{K}\text{2}\text{)H′| = |(}\text{K}\text{2}\text{)H|}$ if K is even and |(l)H′| = |(l)H| + |(K ? l)H| if $\text{l>}\text{K}\text{2}$.     

A generalization of the Kruskal-Katona theorem

Let k_n ? k_n?1 ? … ? k₁ be positive integers and let ($\text{i}\text{j}$) denote the coefficient of xⁱ in $\text{Π}\text{r=1}\text{j}\text{(1 + x + x}{}^2\text{+ … + x}{}^{\mathrm{kr}}\text{)}$. For given integers l, m, where 1 ? l ? k_n + k_n?1 + … + k₁ and $\text{1 ? m ? (}\text{n}\text{n}\text{)}$, it is shown that there exist unique integers m(l), m(l ? 1),…, m(t), satisfying certain conditions, for which $\text{m = (}\text{m(l)}\text{l}\text{+ (}\text{m(l?1)}\text{l?1}\text{) + … + (}\text{m(t)}\text{t}\text{)}$. Moreover, any m l-subsets of a multiset with k_i elements of type i, i = 1, 2,…, n, will contain at least $\text{(}\text{m(l)}\text{l?1}\text{) + (}\text{m(l?1)}\text{l?2}\text{) + … + (}\text{m(t)}\text{t?1}$ different (l ? 1)-subsets. This result has been anticipated by Greene and Kleitman, but the formulation there is not completely correct. If k₁ = 1, the numbers ($\text{j}\text{i}$) are binomial coefficients and the result is the Kruskal-Katona theorem.     

Prime interchange graphs of classes of matrices of zeros and ones

Let R = (r₁,…, r_m) and S = (s₁,…, s_n) be nonnegative integral vectors, and let $\text{U}$(R, S) denote the class of all m × n matrices of 0's and 1's having row sum vector R and column sum vector S. An invariant position of $\text{U}$(R, S) is a position whose entry is the same for all matrices in $\text{U}$(R, S). The interchange graph G(R, S) is the graph where the vertices are the matrices in $\text{U}$(R, S) and where two matrices are joined by an edge provided they differ by an interchange. We prove that when 1 ≤ r_i ≤ n ? 1 (i = 1,…, m) and 1 ≤ s_j ≤ m ? 1 (j = 1,…, n), G(R, S) is prime if and only if $\text{U}$(R, S) has no invariant positions.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

On a class of relatively prime sequences

For each natural number n, let a₀(n) = n, and if a₀(n),…,a_i(n) have already been defined, let a_i+1(n) > a_i(n) be minimal with (a_i+1(n), a₀(n) … a_i(n)) = 1. Let g(n) be the largest a_i(n) not a prime or the square of a prime. We show that g(n) ～ n and that $\text{g(n) > n + cn}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{log}\text{(n)}$ for some c > 0. The true order of magnitude of g(n) ? n seems to be connected with the fine distribution of prime numbers. We also show that “most” a_i(n) that are not primes or squares of primes are products of two distinct primes. A result of independent interest comes of one of our proofs: For every sufficiently large n there is a prime $\text{p < n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ with [$\text{n}\text{p}$] composite.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

Oscillatory properties of strongly superlinear differential equations with deviating arguments

We regard a graph G as a set {1,…, v} together with a nonempty set E of two-element subsets of {1,…, v}. Let p = (p₁,…, p_v) be an element of $\text{R}$^nv representing v points in $\text{R}$ⁿ and consider the realization G(p) of G in $\text{R}$ⁿ consisting of the line segments [p_i, p_j] in $\text{R}$ⁿ for {i, j} ?E. The figure G(p) is said to be rigid in $\text{R}$ⁿ if every continuous path in $\text{R}$^nv, beginning at p and preserving the edge lengths of G(p), terminates at a point q ? $\text{R}$^nv which is the image (Tp₁,…, Tp_v) of p under an isometry T of $\text{R}$ⁿ. We here study the rigidity and infinitesimal rigidity of graphs, surfaces, and more general structures. A graph theoretic method for determining the rigidity of graphs in $\text{R}$² is discussed, followed by an examination of the rigidity of convex polyhedral surfaces in $\text{R}$³.     

A characterization of the class of credibility matrices corresponding to a certain class of discrete distributions

Recently (see De Vylder & Goovaerts (1984), this issue) so called credibility matrices have been introduced and studied in the framework of general properties of matrices, such as non-negativity, total positivity etc. In the present note we characterize a class of credibility matrices generated by the normed sequence of functions (p_l, p_l,…, p_n) on K = [0, b] where $\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(θ) =?(i)g(θ)h}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(θ)}$, i=0, …, n, θ ? K, and where ?, g, h are nonnegative (eventually depending on n, n may be finite or infinite). For simplicity we suppose h to be monotonic and continuous.     

Existence of stable equilibrium point for dynamical systems of Volterra type

This paper presents sufficient conditions for the existence of a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point of a dynamical system of Volterra type, (1) $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{) x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) = ?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)[f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{(t),…, x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)) ? q}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{], i = 1,…, n}$, for every q = (q₁,…, q_n)^T?Rⁿ. Results of a nonlinear complementarity problem are applied to obtain the conditions. System (1) has a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point if (i) f(x) = (f₁(x),…,f_n(x))^T is a continuous and differentiable M-function and it satisfies a certain surjectivity property, or (ii), f(x) is continuous and strongly monotone on R₊₀ⁿ.     

The number of Hamiltonian circuits

G = 〈V(G), E(G)〉 denotes a directed graph without loops and multiple arrows. $\text{K}$(G) denotes the set of all Hamiltonian circuits of G. Put H(n, r) = max{|E(G)|, |V(G)| = n, 1 ≤ |$\text{K}$(G)| ≤ r}. Theorem: $\text{H(n, 1) = (}\text{n}{}^2\text{2}\text{) + (}\text{n}\text{2}\text{) ?1}$. Further, H(n, 2),…, H(n, 5) are given.     

A class of facet producing graphs for vertex packing polyhedra

We examine a family of graphs called webs. For integers n ? 2 and $\text{k, 1 ? k ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{n}$, the web W(n, k) has vertices V_n = {1, …, n} and edges {(i, j): j = i+k, …, i+n ? k, for i?V_n (sums mod n)}. A characterization is given for the vertex packing polyhedron of W(n, k) to contain a facet, none of whose projections is a facet for the lower dimensional vertex packing polyhedra of proper induced subgraphs of W(n, k). Simple necessary and sufficient conditions are given for W(n, k) to contain W(n′, k′) as an induced subgraph; these conditions are used to show that webs satisfy the Strong Perfect Graph Conjecture. Complements of webs are also studied and it is shown that if both a graph and its complement are webs, then the graph is either an odd hole or its complement.     

Asymptotic independence of distributions of normalized order statistics of the underlying probability measure

Let n denote the sample size, and let r_i ∈ {1,…,n} fulfill the conditions r_i ? r_i?1 ≥ 5 for i = 1,…,k. It is proved that the joint normalized distribution of the order statistics Z_ri:n, i = 1,…,k, is independent of the underlying probability measure up to a remainder term of order $\text{O((}\text{k}\text{n}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$. A counterexample shows that, as far as central order statistics are concerned, this remainder term is not of the order $\text{O((}\text{k}\text{n}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ if r_i ? r_i?1 = 1 for i = 2,…,k.     

Permutations and successions

Let π = (π(1), π(2),…, π(n)) be a permutation on {1, 2, …, n}. A succession (respectively, ¹-succession) in π is any pair π(i), π(i + 1), where π(i + 1) = π(i) + 1 (respectively, π(i + 1) ≡ π(i) + 1 (mod n)), i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1. Let R(n, k) (respectively, $\text{R}{}^1\text{(n, k)}$) be the number of permutations with k successions (respectively, ¹-successions). In this note we determine R(n, k) and $\text{R}{}^1\text{(n, k)}$. In addition, these notions are generalized to the case of circular permutations, where analogous results are developed.     

A conjecture of recski in combinatorial set theory

A p-cover of $\text{n = {1, 2,…,}\text{n}\text{}}$ is a family of subsets $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{≠ ?}$ such that ∪ S_i = n and |S_i ∩ S_i| ? p for i ≠ j. We prove that for fixed p, the number of p-cover of n is O(n^p+1logn).     

On decomposition of r-partite graphs into edge-disjoint hamilton circuits

Let K(n;r) denote the complete r-partite graph K(n, n,…, n). It is shown here that for all even n(r ? 1) ? 2, K(n;r) is the union of $\text{n(r ? 1)}\text{2}$ of its Hamilton circuits which are mutually edge-disjoint, and for all odd n(r ? 1) ? 1, K(n;r) is the union of $\text{(n(r ? 1) ? 1)}\text{2}$ of its Hamilton circuits and a 1-factor, all of which are mutually edge-disjoint.     

Lattice paths in regions with the catalan property

If α = {α₀, α₁,…, α_n} and β = {β₀, β₁,…, β_n} are two non-decreasing sets of integers such that α₀ = 0 < β₀, α_n < β_n = n, and α_i < i < β_i for 1 ? i ? n ? 1, let L denote the set of lattice points (p, q) such that 0 ? p ? n and α_p ? q ? β_p. We determine all such regions L with the property that the number of lattice paths from (0, 0) to (p, p) in L is the Catalan number$\text{(p + 2)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{(}\text{2p+2}\text{p+1}\text{)}$ for 0 ? p ? n.     

On maximal antichains containing no set and its complement

Let 1?k₁?k₂?…?k_n be integers and let S denote the set of all vectors x = (x₁, …, x_n with integral coordinates satisfying 0?x_i?k_i, i = 1,2, …, n; equivalently, S is the set of all subsets of a multiset consisting of k_i elements of type i, i = 1,2, …, n. A subset X of S is an antichain if and only if for any two vectors x and y in X the inequalities x_i?y_i, i = 1,2, …, n, do not all hold. For an arbitrary subset H of S, (i)H denotes the subset of H consisting of vectors with component sum i, i = 0, 1, 2, …, K, where K = k₁ + k₂ + …k_n. |H| denotes the number of vectors in H, and the complement of a vector x?S is (k₁-x₁, k₂-x₂, …, k_n -x_n). What is the maximal cardinality of an antichain containing no vector and its complement? The answer is obtained as a corollary of the following theorem: if X is an antichain, K is even and$\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)X|}$ does not exceed the number of vectors in $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)S}$ with first coordinate different from k₁, then

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{K}\text{i≠}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K}\text{|(i)X|}\text{|(i)S|}\text{+}\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)X|}\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K-1)S|}\text{?1}$

.