Capital Allocation for Sarmanov’s Class of Distributions

This paper is a follow-up of the study realized by Vernic (2014) on the aggregation of dependent random variables joined by Sarmanov’s multivariate distribution, with accent on the particular case of exponentially distributed marginals. More precisely, in this paper we present capital allocation formulas for a portfolio of risks following the just mentioned Sarmanov’s distribution. The overall capital and its allocation to the risk sources are evaluated using the TVaR rule. The resulting formulas are illustrated in some particular cases.     

On the Distribution of a Sum of Sarmanov Distributed Random Variables

Built from given marginals with a flexible dependency structure, Sarmanov’s family of multivariate distributions became of interest in various fields. In this paper, we present some formulas for the density of the sum of several random variables joined by Sarmanov’s distribution, with accent on the particular case of exponentially distributed marginals. Such results are useful in solving, e.g., financial and actuarial problems.     

A participatory multi-criteria approach for power generation and transmission planning

It is well-known that reinsurance can be an effective risk management solution for financial institutions such as the insurance companies. The optimal reinsurance solution depends on a number of factors including the criterion of optimization and the premium principle adopted by the reinsurer. In this paper, we analyze the Value-at-Risk based optimal risk management solution using reinsurance under a class of premium principles that is monotonic and piecewise. The monotonic piecewise premium principles include not only those which preserve stop-loss ordering, but also the piecewise premium principles which are monotonic and constructed by concatenating a series of premium principles. By adopting the monotonic piecewise premium principle, our proposed optimal reinsurance model has a number of advantages. In particular, our model has the flexibility of allowing the reinsurer to use different risk loading factors for a given premium principle or use entirely different premium principles depending on the layers of risk. Our proposed model can also analyze the optimal reinsurance strategy in the context of multiple reinsurers that may use different premium principles (as attributed to the difference in risk attitude and/or imperfect information). Furthermore, by artfully imposing certain constraints on the ceded loss functions, the resulting model can be used to capture the reinsurer’s willingness and/or capacity to accept risk or to control counterparty risk from the perspective of the insurer. Under some technical assumptions, we derive explicitly the optimal form of the reinsurance strategies in all the above cases. In particular, we show that a truncated stop-loss reinsurance treaty or a limited stop-loss reinsurance treaty can be optimal depending on the constraint imposed on the retained and/or ceded loss functions. Some numerical examples are provided to further compare and contrast our proposed models to the existing models.     

Optimal quota-share and stop-loss reinsurance from the perspectives of insurer and reinsurer

Reinsurance plays a vital role in the insurance activities. The insurer and the reinsurer, which have conflicting interests, compose the two parties of a reinsurance contract. In this paper, we extend the results achieved by Tan et al. (N Am Actuar J 13(4):459–482, 2009) to the case in which the perspectives of both the insurer and the reinsurer are considered. We study the optimal quota-share and stop-loss reinsurance models by minimizing the convex combination of the VaR risk measures of the insurer’s cost and the reinsurer’s cost. Furthermore, as many as 16 reinsurance premium principles are investigated. The results show that optimal quota-share and stop-loss reinsurance may or may not exist depending on the chosen principles. Moreover, we establish the sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence of the nontrivial optimal reinsurance.     

Optimal reinsurance with regulatory initial capital and default risk

In a reinsurance contract, a reinsurer promises to pay the part of the loss faced by an insurer in exchange for receiving a reinsurance premium from the insurer. However, the reinsurer may fail to pay the promised amount when the promised amount exceeds the reinsurer’s solvency. As a seller of a reinsurance contract, the initial capital or reserve of a reinsurer should meet some regulatory requirements. We assume that the initial capital or reserve of a reinsurer is regulated by the value-at-risk (VaR) of its promised indemnity. When the promised indemnity exceeds the total of the reinsurer’s initial capital and the reinsurance premium, the reinsurer may fail to pay the promised amount or default may occur. In the presence of the regulatory initial capital and the counterparty default risk, we investigate optimal reinsurance designs from an insurer’s point of view and derive optimal reinsurance strategies that maximize the expected utility of an insurer’s terminal wealth or minimize the VaR of an insurer’s total retained risk. It turns out that optimal reinsurance strategies in the presence of the regulatory initial capital and the counterparty default risk are different both from optimal reinsurance strategies in the absence of the counterparty default risk and from optimal reinsurance strategies in the presence of the counterparty default risk but without the regulatory initial capital.     

Solvency II,regulatory capital,and optimal reinsurance: How good are Conditional Value-at-Risk and spectral risk measures?

We study the problem of optimal reinsurance as a means of risk management in the regulatory framework of Solvency II under Conditional Value-at-Risk and, as its natural extension, spectral risk measures. First, we show that stop-loss reinsurance is optimal under both Conditional Value-at-Risk and spectral risk measures. Spectral risk measures thus constitute a more general class of suitable regulatory risk measures than specific Conditional Value-at-Risk. At the same time, the established type of stop-loss reinsurance can be maintained as the optimal risk management strategy that minimizes regulatory capital. Second, we derive the optimal deductibles for stop-loss reinsurance. We show that under Conditional Value-at-Risk, the optimal deductible tends towards restrictive and counter-intuitive corner solutions or “plunging”, which is a serious objection against its use in regulatory risk management. By means of the broader class of spectral risk measures, we are able to overcome this shortcoming as optimal deductibles are now interior solutions. Especially, the recently discussed power spectral risk measures and the Wang risk measure are shown to avoid any plunging. They yield a one-to-one correspondence between the risk parameter and the optimal deductible and, thus, provide economically plausible risk management strategies.     

Optimality of general reinsurance contracts under CTE risk measure

By formulating a constrained optimization model, we address the problem of optimal reinsurance design using the criterion of minimizing the conditional tail expectation (CTE) risk measure of the insurer’s total risk. For completeness, we analyze the optimal reinsurance model under both binding and unbinding reinsurance premium constraints. By resorting to the Lagrangian approach based on the concept of directional derivative, explicit and analytical optimal solutions are obtained in each case under some mild conditions. We show that pure stop-loss ceded loss function is always optimal. More interestingly, we demonstrate that ceded loss functions, that are not always non-decreasing, could be optimal. We also show that, in some cases, it is optimal to exhaust the entire reinsurance premium budget to determine the optimal reinsurance, while in other cases, it is rational to spend less than the prescribed reinsurance premium budget.     

On randomized reinsurance contracts

In this paper we discuss the potential of randomizing reinsurance treaties for efficient risk management. While it may be considered counter-intuitive to introduce additional external randomness in the determination of the retention function for a given occurred loss, we indicate why and to what extent randomizing a treaty can be interesting for the insurer. We illustrate the approach with a detailed analysis of the effects of randomizing a stop-loss treaty on the expected profit after reinsurance in the framework of a one-year reinsurance model under regulatory solvency constraints and cost of capital considerations.     

Multivariate skew-normal distributions with applications in insurance

In this paper, we discuss the skew-normal distribution as an alternative to the classical normal one in the context of both risk measurement and capital allocation. As main risk measure, we consider the tail conditional expectation (TCE). Hence, we investigate an allocation formula based on the TCE, but we also consider Wang’s [Wang, S., 2002. A set of new methods and tools for enterprise risk capital management and portfolio optimization. Working paper. SCOR reinsurance company (www.casact.com/pubs/forum/02sforum/02sf043.pdf)] allocation formula.     

关于停止损失再保险的调节系数最大化问题

停止损失再保险作为一种再保险方式,在具有相同保费的前提下,能使保险人的期望效用最大,并能使其自留风险方差最小.另外在保费和费率相等的前提下,停止损失再保险的调节系数不可能比其他再保险方式的调节系数小.本论文在此基础上作了相应推广,讨论了在保费相等的前提下,停止损失再保险的费率满足时,其调节系数不小于其他再保险方式的调节系数.     

Multivariate reinsurance designs for minimizing an insurer’s capital requirement

This paper investigates optimal reinsurance strategies for an insurer with multiple lines of business under the criterion of minimizing its total capital requirement calculated based on the multivariate lower-orthant Value-at-Risk. The reinsurance is purchased by the insurer for each line of business separately. The premium principles used to compute the reinsurance premiums are allowed to differ from one line of business to another, but they all satisfy three mild conditions: distribution invariance, risk loading and preserving the convex order, which are satisfied by many popular premium principles. Our results show that an optimal strategy for the insurer is to buy a two-layer reinsurance policy for each line of business, and it reduces to be a one-layer reinsurance contract for premium principles satisfying some additional mild conditions, which are met by the expected value principle, standard deviation principle and Wang’s principle among many others. In the end of this paper, some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the effects of marginal distributions, risk dependence structure and reinsurance premium principles on the optimal layer reinsurance.     

Optimal reinsurance policy: The adjustment coefficient and the expected utility criteria

This paper is concerned with the optimal form of reinsurance from the ceding company point of view, when the cedent seeks to maximize the adjustment coefficient of the retained risk. We deal with the problem by exploring the relationship between maximizing the adjustment coefficient and maximizing the expected utility of wealth for the exponential utility function, both with respect to the retained risk of the insurer.Assuming that the premium calculation principle is a convex functional and that some other quite general conditions are fulfilled, we prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions and provide a necessary optimal condition. These results are used to find the optimal reinsurance policy when the reinsurance premium calculation principle is the expected value principle or the reinsurance loading is an increasing function of the variance. In the expected value case the optimal form of reinsurance is a stop-loss contract. In the other cases, it is described by a nonlinear function.     

Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures

Let X denote the loss initially assumed by an insurer. In a reinsurance design, the insurer cedes part of its loss, say f(X), to a reinsurer, and thus the insurer retains a loss I_f(X)=X−f(X). In return, the insurer is obligated to compensate the reinsurer for undertaking the risk by paying the reinsurance premium. Hence, the sum of the retained loss and the reinsurance premium can be interpreted as the total cost of managing the risk in the presence of reinsurance. Based on a technique used in [Müller, A., Stoyan, D., 2002. Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks. In: Willey Series in Probability and Statistics] and motivated by [Cai J., Tan K.S., 2007. Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measure. Astin Bull. 37 (1), 93–112] on using the value-at-risk (VaR) and the conditional tail expectation (CTE) of an insurer’s total cost as the criteria for determining the optimal reinsurance, this paper derives the optimal ceded loss functions in a class of increasing convex ceded loss functions. The results indicate that depending on the risk measure’s level of confidence and the safety loading for the reinsurance premium, the optimal reinsurance can be in the forms of stop-loss, quota-share, or change-loss.     

How retention levels influence the variability of the total risk under reinsurance

Recently, Escudero and Ortega (Insur. Math. Econ. 43:255–262, 2008) have considered an extension of the largest claims reinsurance with arbitrary random retention levels. They have analyzed the effect of some dependencies on the Laplace transform of the retained total claim amount. In this note, we study how dependencies influence the variability of the retained and the reinsured total claim amount, under excess-loss and stop-loss reinsurance policies, with stochastic retention levels. Stochastic directional convexity properties, variability orderings, and bounds for the retained and the reinsured total risk are given. Some examples on the calculation of bounds for stop-loss premiums (i.e., the expected value of the reinsured total risk under this treaty) and for net premiums for the cedent company under excess-loss, and complementary results on convex comparisons of discounted values of benefits for the insurer from a portfolio with risks having random policy limits (deductibles) are derived.      

基于风险调整资本收益率下的最优再保险策略

风险调整资本收益率是一个用来描述赚取收益所承担风险的重要指标,是衡量风险调整后的财务绩效的一个有效工具,在银行业中得到广泛采用。近年来,在保险公司的再保险业务中,也越来越多地采用风险调整资本收益率这一指标来衡量收益和风险。本文重新考虑了有再保险控制下的风险调整资本收益率,并得到:在一般再保险自留函数下,我们证明了分层再保险策略是最优再保险形式;进一步,我们获得了最优再保险分层水平及最优风险调整资本收益率;最后,我们也给出了算例及数值分析。     

Concave distortion risk minimizing reinsurance design under adverse selection

This article makes use of the well-known Principal–Agent (multidimensional screening) model commonly used in economics to analyze a monopolistic reinsurance market in the presence of adverse selection, where the risk preference of each insurer is guided by its concave distortion risk measure of the terminal wealth position; while the reinsurer, under information asymmetry, aims to maximize its expected profit by designing an optimal policy provision (menu) of “shirt-fit” stop-loss reinsurance contracts for every insurer of either type of low or high risk. In particular, the most representative case of Tail Value-at-Risk (TVaR) is further explored in detail so as to unveil the underlying insight from economics perspective.     

GlueVaRʧ����ն����µ������ٱ���

??Motivated by[1] and [2], we study in this paper the optimal (from the insurer's point of view) reinsurance problem when risk is measured by a general risk measure, namely the GlueVaR distortion risk measures which is firstly proposed by [3].Suppose an insurer is exposed to the risk and decides to buy a reinsurance contract written on the total claim amounts basis, i.e. the reinsurer covers and the cedent covers . In addition, the insurer is obligated to compensate the reinsurer for undertaking the risk by paying the reinsurance premium, ( is the safety loading), under the expectation premium principle. Based on a technique used in [2], this paper derives the optimal ceded loss functions in a class of increasing convex ceded loss functions. It turns out that the optimal ceded loss function is of stop-loss type.     

Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures

This paper studies the optimal reinsurance problem when risk is measured by a general risk measure. Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions are given for a wide family of risk measures, including deviation measures, expectation bounded risk measures and coherent measures of risk. The optimality conditions are used to verify whether the classical reinsurance contracts (quota-share, stop-loss) are optimal essentially, regardless of the risk measure used. The paper ends by particularizing the findings, so as to study in detail two deviation measures and the conditional value at risk.     

具有共同冲击相依性的跳扩散金融市场中有着延迟和违约风险的鲁棒最优再保险和投资策略

在本文中,我们考虑跳扩散模型下具有延迟和违约风险的鲁棒最优再保险和投资问题,保险人可以投资无风险资产,可违约的债券和两个风险资产,其中两个风险资产遵循跳跃扩散模型且受到同种因素带来共同影响而相互关联.假设允许保险人购买比例再保险,特别地再保险保费利用均值方差保费原则来计算.在考虑与绩效相关的资本流入/流出下,保险公司的...