4‐Pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2) and bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate

4‐Hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid cocrystallize as a hydrate, 4‐pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2), 2C₅H₅NO·C₈H₆O₄·2H₂O, from a methanol–water solution. The molecules form a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network resulting in sheets of hydrogen‐bonded molecules that lie parallel to the (10) plane. In contrast, 3‐hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid form the salt bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate, 2C₅H₆NO⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻, giving rise to two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets extending through the lattice parallel to the (10) plane.     

Supramolecular architectures in two 1:1 cocrystals of 5‐fluorouracil with 5‐bromothiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid and thiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid

In solid‐state engineering, cocrystallization is a strategy actively pursued for pharmaceuticals. Two 1:1 cocrystals of 5‐fluorouracil (5FU; systematic name: 5‐fluoro‐1,3‐dihydropyrimidine‐2,4‐dione), namely 5‐fluorouracil–5‐bromothiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), C₅H₃BrO₂S·C₄H₃FN₂O₂, (I), and 5‐fluorouracil–thiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), C₄H₃FN₂O₂·C₅H₄O₂S, (II), have been synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. In both cocrystals, carboxylic acid molecules are linked through an acid–acid R ₂²(8) homosynthon (O—H…O) to form a carboxylic acid dimer and 5FU molecules are connected through two types of base pairs [homosynthon, R ₂²(8) motif] via a pair of N—H…O hydrogen bonds. The crystal structures are further stabilized by C—H…O interactions in (II) and C—Br…O interactions in (I). In both crystal structures, π–π stacking and C—F…π interactions are also observed.     

Water‐induced pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motifs in xanthine–inorganic acid complexes

In xanthinium nitrate hydrate [systematic name: 2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydro‐9H‐purin‐7‐ium nitrate monohydrate], C₅H₅N₄O₂⁺·NO₃⁻·H₂O, (I), and xanthinium hydrogen sulfate hydrate [systematic name: 2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydro‐9H‐purin‐7‐ium hydrogen sulfate monohydrate], C₅H₅N₄O₂⁺·HSO₄⁻·H₂O, (II), the xanthine molecules are protonated at the imine N atom with the transfer of an H atom from the inorganic acid. The asymmetric unit of (I) contains a xanthinium cation, a nitrate anion and one water molecule, while that of (II) contains two crystallographically independent xanthinium cations, two hydrogen sulfate anions and two water molecules. A pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif is formed between the xanthinium cations and the water molecules via N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds in both structures, and leads to the formation of one‐dimensional polymeric tapes. These cation–water tapes are further connected by the respective anions and aggregate into two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets in (I) and three‐dimensional arrangements in (II).     

Two pseudopolymorphic hydrates of brucine: brucine–water (1/4) and brucine–water (1/5.25) at 130 K

The structures of two pseudopolymorphic hydrates of brucine, C₂₃H₂₆N₂O₄·4H₂O, (I), and C₂₃H₂₆N₂O₄·5.25H₂O, (II), have been determined at 130 K. In both (I) and (II) (which has two independent brucine mol­ecules together with 10.5 water mol­ecules of solvation in the asymmetric unit), the brucine mol­ecules form head‐to‐tail sheet substructures, which associate with the water mol­ecules in the inter­stitial cavities through hydrogen‐bonding associations and, together with water–water associations, give three‐dimensional framework structures.     

Hydrogen bonding in 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with 4‐X‐substituted anilines (X = F,Cl or Br)

The crystal structures of three proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid (3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonic acid) with 4‐X‐substituted anilines (X = F, Cl and Br), namely 4‐fluoro­anilinium 5‐sulfosalicylate (3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate) monohydrate, C₆H₇FN⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (I), 4‐chloro­anilinium 5‐sulfosalicylate hemihydrate, C₆H₇ClN⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·0.5H₂O, (II), and 4‐bromo­anilinium 5‐sulfosalicylate monohydrate, C₆H₇BrN⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (III), have been determined. The asymmetric unit in (II) contains two formula units. All three compounds have three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded polymeric structures in which both the water molecule and the carboxylic acid group are involved in structure extension. With both (II) and (III), which are structurally similar, the common cyclic (8) dimeric carboxylic acid association is present, whereas in (I), an unusual cyclic (8) association involving all three hetero‐species is found.     

Hydrogen‐bonded networks in 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine–fumaric acid (2/1) and 2‐aminopyridinium dl‐malate

Crystals of 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine–(2E)‐but‐2‐enedioate (2/1), 2C₅H₅ClN₂·C₄H₄O₄, (I), and 2‐aminopyridinium dl ‐3‐carboxy‐2‐hydroxypropanoate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₅⁻, (II), are built from the neutral 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine molecule and fumaric acid in the case of (I) and from ring‐N‐protonated 2‐aminopyridinium cations and malate anions in (II). The fumaric acid molecule lies on an inversion centre. In (I), the neutral 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine and fumaric acid molecules interact via hydrogen bonds, forming two‐dimensional layers parallel to the (100) plane, whereas in (II), oppositely charged units interact via ionic and hydrogen bonds, forming a three‐dimensional network.     

Influence of solvent on the structures of two one‐dimensional cobalt(II) coordination polymers with tetrachloroterephthalate

The title cobalt coordination polymers, catena‐poly[[[aquatripyridinecobalt(II)]‐μ‐tetrachloroterephthalato] pyridine solvate], {[Co(C₈Cl₄O₄)(C₅H₅N)₃(H₂O)]·C₅H₅N}_n, (I), and catena‐poly[[[diaquadipyridinecobalt(II)]‐μ‐tetrachloroterephthalato] 1,4‐dioxane trihydrate], {[Co(C₈Cl₄O₄)(C₅H₅N)₂(H₂O)₂]·C₄H₈O₂·3H₂O}_n, (II), have been prepared with tetrachloroterephthalic acid (H₂BDC‐Cl₄) under different solvent media. Both complexes form infinite cobalt(II)–tetrachloroterephthalate polymeric chains. In (I), two independent Co^II ions are six‐coordinated through N₃O₃ donor sets in slightly distorted octahedral geometries provided by two carboxylate and three pyridine ligands, and one water molecule. The structure of (II) contains two independent Co^II atoms, each lying on a twofold axis, which adopt a tetragonally distorted N₂O₄ octahedral geometry via two carboxylate groups, two pyridine ligands and two water molecules. The different stoichiometry of coordinated and solvent guest molecules leads to different two‐dimensional supramolecular networks, with (I) utilizing C—H...π and weak π–π interactions and (II) utilizing mainly conventional hydrogen bonding.     

Tetra‐ and hexahydrates of bis(adeninium) zoledronate

The present paper reports the structures of bis(adeninium) zoledronate tetrahydrate {systematic name: bis(6‐amino‐7H‐purin‐1‐ium) hydrogen [1‐hydroxy‐2‐(1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)‐1‐phosphonatoethyl]phosphonate tetrahydrate}, 2C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₅H₈N₂O₇P₂²⁻·4H₂O, (I), and bis(adeninium) zoledronate hexahydrate {systematic name: a 1:1 cocrystal of bis(6‐amino‐7H‐purin‐1‐ium) hydrogen [1‐hydroxy‐2‐(1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)‐1‐phosphonatoethyl]phosphonate hexahydrate and 6‐amino‐7H‐purin‐1‐ium 6‐amino‐7H‐purine dihydrogen [1‐hydroxy‐2‐(1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)ethane‐1,1‐diyl]diphosphonate hexahydrate}, 2C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₅H₈N₂O₇P₂²⁻·6H₂O, (II). One of the adenine molecules and one of the phosphonate groups of the zoledronate anion of (II) are protonated on a 50% basis. The zoledronate group displays its usual zwitterionic character, with a protonated imidazole ring; however, the ionization state of the phosphonate groups of the anion for (I) and (II) are different. In (I), the anion has both singly and doubly deprotonated phosphonate groups, while in (II), it has one singly deprotonated phosphonate group and a partially deprotonated phosphonate group. In (I), the cations form an R₂²(10) base pair, while in (II), they form R₂²(8) and R₂²(10) base pairs. Two water molecules in (I) and five water molecules in (II) are involved in water–water interactions. The presence of an additional two water molecules in the structure of (II) might influence the different ionization state of the anion as well as the different packing mode compared to (I).     

Dibenzylammonium hydrogen maleate and a redetermination at 120 K of bis(dibenzylamino)methane

In dibenzylammonium hydrogen maleate [or dibenzylammonium (2Z)‐3‐carboxyprop‐2‐enoate], C₁₄H₁₆N⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻, (I), the anion contains a fairly short and nearly linear O—H...O hydrogen bond, with an O...·O distance of 2.4603 (16) Å, but with the H atom clearly offset from the mid‐point of the O...O vector. The counter‐ions in (I) are linked by two N—H...O hydrogen bonds to form C₂²(6) chains and these chains are weakly linked into sheets by a C—H...O hydrogen bond. Bis(dibenzylamino)methane, C₂₉H₃₀N₂, (II), crystallizes with two independent molecules lying across twofold rotation axes in the space group C2/c, and the molecules are conformationally chiral; there are no direction‐specific intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure of (II).     

Two tetranuclear zinc clusters, [Zn4(μ3‐OEt)2(μ2‐MalO)4Et2] and [Zn4(μ3‐GueO)2(μ2‐GueO)2(μ2‐MalO)2(MalO)2]·2C7H8, containing defective dicubane core geometries (MalOH is maltol and GueOH is guethol)

The zinc alkoxide molecules in di‐μ₃‐ethanolato‐diethyltetrakis(μ₂‐2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐3‐olato‐κ³O³,O⁴:O³)tetrazinc(II), [Zn₄(C₂H₅)₂(C₂H₅O)₂(C₆H₅O₃)₄], (I), and bis(μ₃‐2‐ethoxyphenolato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O¹:O¹)bis(μ₂‐2‐ethoxyphenolato‐κ³O¹,O²:O¹)bis(μ₂‐2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐3‐olato‐κ³O³,O⁴:O³)bis(2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐3‐olato‐κ²O³,O⁴)tetrazinc(II) toluene disolvate, [Zn₄(C₆H₅O₃)₄(C₈H₉O₂)₄]·2C₇H₈, (II), lie on crystallographic centres of inversion. The asymmetric units of (I) and (II) contain half of the tetrameric unit and additionally one molecule of toluene for (II). The Zn^II atoms are four‐ and six‐coordinated in distorted tetrahedral and octahedral geometries for (I), and six‐coordinated in a distorted octahedral environment for (II). The Zn^II atoms in both compounds are arranged in a defect dicubane Zn₄O₆ core structure composed of two EtZnO₃ tetrahedra and ZnO₆ octahedra for (I), and of four ZnO₆ octahedra for (II), sharing common corners. The maltolate ligands exist mostly in a μ₂‐bridging mode, while the guetholate ligands prefer a higher coordination mode and act as μ₃‐ and μ₂‐bridges.     

N‐Fluoropyridinium trifluoromethanesulfonate and 1‐fluoro‐2,4,6‐trimethoxy‐1,3,5‐triazinium hexafluoroantimonate: the first experimental determination of the F—N+ bond length involving sp2 nitrogen

The structures of N‐fluoro­pyridinium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfon­ate, C₅H₅FN⁺·CF₃O₃S⁻, (I), and 1‐fluoro‐2,4,6‐tri­methoxy‐1,3,5‐triazinium hexa­fluoro­antimonate, (C₆H₉FN₃O₃)[SbF₆], (II), are presented. The N—F bond lengths in (I), a well known electrophilic fluorinating agent, and its novel analogue, (II), are 1.357 (4) and 1.354 (4) Å, respectively.     

Comparison of the hydrogen‐bond patterns in 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1) and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1)

The X‐ray single‐crystal structure determinations of the chemically related compounds 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, C₂H₄N₃S⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, (I), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), C₂H₃N₃S·2C₄H₆O₄, (II), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₅H₈O₄, (III), and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₆H₁₀O₄, (IV), are reported and their hydrogen‐bonding patterns are compared. The hydrogen bonds are of the types N—H...O or O—H...N and are of moderate strength. In some cases, weak C—H...O interactions are also present. Compound (II) differs from the others not only in the molar ratio of base and acid (1:2), but also in its hydrogen‐bonding pattern, which is based on chain motifs. In (I), (III) and (IV), the most prominent feature is the presence of an R₂²(8) graph‐set motif formed by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, which are present in all structures except for (I), where only a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds is present, in agreement with the greater acidity of oxalic acid. There are nonbonding S...O interactions present in all four structures. The difference electron‐density maps show a lack of electron density about the S atom along the S...O vector. In all four structures, the carboxylic acid H atoms are present in a rare configuration with a C—C—O—H torsion angle of ∼0°. In the structures of (II)–(IV), the C—C—O—H torsion angle of the second carboxylic acid group has the more common value of ∼|180|°. The dicarboxylic acid molecules are situated on crystallographic inversion centres in (II). The Raman and IR spectra of the title compounds are presented and analysed.     

The 1:1 inclusion compounds zolmitriptan–benzene and zolmitriptan–phenol

In the benzene and phenol solvates of (S)‐4‐{3‐[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]‐1H‐indol‐5‐ylmethyl}oxazolidin‐2‐one, viz. C₁₆H₂₁N₃O₂·C₆H₆, (I), and C₁₆H₂₁N₃O₂·C₆H₅OH, (II), the host molecule has three linked residues, namely a planar indole ring system, an ethylamine side chain and an oxazolidinone system. It has comparable features to that of sumatriptan, although the side‐chain orientations of (I) and (II) differ from those of sumatriptan. Both (I) and (II) have host–guest‐type structures. The host molecule in (I) and (II) has an L‐shaped form, with the oxazolidinone ring occupying the base and the remainder of the molecule forming the upright section. In (I), each benzene guest molecule is surrounded by four host molecules, and these molecules are linked by a combination of N—H...N, N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds into chains of edge‐fused R₄⁴(33) rings. In (II), two independent molecules are present in the asymmetric unit, with similar conformations. The heterocyclic components are connected through N—H...N, N—H...O and C—H...O interactions to form chains of edge‐fused R₆⁴(38) rings, from which the phenol guest molecules are pendent, linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The structures are further stabilized by extensive C—H...π interactions.     

Two two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded coordination networks: bis(3‐carboxybenzoato‐κO)bis(4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN3)copper(II) and bis(3‐methylbenzoato‐κN)bis(4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN3)copper(II) monohydrate

The title two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded coordination compounds, [Cu(C₈H₅O₄)₂(C₄H₆N₂)₂], (I), and [Cu(C₈H₇O₂)₂(C₄H₆N₂)₂]·H₂O, (II), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The molecule of complex (I) lies across an inversion centre, and the Cu²⁺ ion is coordinated by two N atoms from two 4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole (4‐MeIM) molecules and two O atoms from two 3‐carboxybenzoate (HBDC⁻) anions in a square‐planar geometry. Adjacent molecules are linked through intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into a two‐dimensional sheet with (4,4) topology. In the asymmetric part of the unit cell of (II) there are two symmetry‐independent molecules, in which each Cu²⁺ ion is also coordinated by two N atoms from two 4‐MeIM molecules and two O atoms from two 3‐methylbenzoate (3‐MeBC⁻) anions in a square‐planar coordination. Two neutral complex molecules are held together via N—H...O(carboxylate) hydrogen bonds to generate a dimeric pair, which is further linked via discrete water molecules into a two‐dimensional network with the Schläfli symbol (4³)₂(4⁶,6⁶,8³). In both compounds, as well as the strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds, π–π interactions also stabilize the crystal stacking.     

Tris(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)iron(II) bis(2,4,5‐tricarboxybenzoate) monohydrate and tris(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′)iron(II) 2,5‐dicarboxybenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate–benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acid–water (1/1/2)

The title compounds, tris(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)iron(II) bis(2,4,5‐tricarboxybenzoate) monohydrate, [Fe(C₁₂H₈N₂)₃](C₁₀H₅O₈)₂·H₂O, (I), and tris(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′)iron(II) 2,5‐dicarboxybenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate–benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acid–water (1/1/2), [Fe(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃](C₁₀H₄O₈)·C₁₀H₆O₈·2H₂O, (II), were obtained during an attempt to synthesize a mixed‐ligand complex of Fe^II with an N‐containing ligand and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acid via a solvothermal reaction. In both mononuclear complexes, each Fe^II metal ion is six‐coordinated in a distorted octahedral manner by six N atoms from three chelating 1,10‐phenanthroline or 2,2′‐bipyridine ligands. In compound (I), the Fe^II atom lies on a twofold axis in the space group C2/c, whereas (II) crystallizes in the space group P2₁/n. In both compounds, the uncoordinated carboxylate anions and water molecules are linked by typical O—H...O hydrogen bonds, generating extensive three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond networks which surround the cations.     

One‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with 8‐hydroxyquinoline, 8‐aminoquinoline and quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid (quinaldic acid)

The structures of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with 8‐hydroxyquinoline, 8‐aminoquinoline and quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid (quinaldic acid), namely anhydrous 8‐hydroxyquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₉H₈NO⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (I), 8‐aminoquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₉H₉N₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), and the adduct hydrate 2‐carboxyquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate quinolinium‐2‐carboxylate monohydrate, C₁₀H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻·C₁₀H₇NO₂·H₂O, (III), have been determined at 130 K. Compounds (I) and (II) are isomorphous and all three compounds have one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain structures, formed in (I) through O—H...O_carboxyl extensions and in (II) through N⁺—H...O_carboxyl extensions of cation–anion pairs. In (III), a hydrogen‐bonded cyclic R₂²(10) pseudo‐dimer unit comprising a protonated quinaldic acid cation and a zwitterionic quinaldic acid adduct molecule is found and is propagated through carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl and water O—H...O_carboxyl interactions. In both (I) and (II), there are also cation–anion aromatic ring π–π associations. This work further illustrates the utility of both hydrogen phthalate anions and interactive‐group‐substituted quinoline cations in the formation of low‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures.     

A pair of diastereomeric 1:1 salts of (S)‐ and (R)‐2‐methylpiperazine with (2S,3S)‐tartaric acid

The structures of diastereomeric pairs consisting of (S)‐ and (R)‐2‐methylpiperazine with (2S,3S)‐tartaric acid are both 1:1 salts, namely (S)‐2‐methylpiperazinium (2S,3S)‐tartrate dihydrate, C₅H₁₄N₂²⁺·C₄H₄O₆²⁻·2H₂O, (I), and (R)‐2‐methylpiperazinium (2S,3S)‐tartrate dihydrate, C₅H₁₄N₂²⁺·C₄H₄O₆²⁻·2H₂O, (II), which reveal the formation of well defined ammonium carboxylate salts linked via strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Unlike the situation in the more soluble salt (II), the alternating columns of tartrate and ammonium ions of the less soluble salt (I) are packed neatly in a grid around the a axis, which incorporates water molecules at regular intervals. The increased efficiency of packing for (I) is evident in its lower `packing coefficient', and the hydrogen‐bond contribution is stronger in the more soluble salt (II).     

New pseudopolymorphs of 5‐fluorocytosine

In order to better understand the interaction between the pharmaceutically active compound 5‐fluorocytosine [4‐amino‐5‐fluoropyrimidin‐2(1H)‐one] and its receptor, hydrogen‐bonded complexes with structurally similar bonding patterns have been investigated. During the cocrystallization screening, three new pseudopolymorphs of 5‐fluorocytosine were obtained, namely 5‐fluorocytosine dimethyl sulfoxide solvate, C₄H₄FN₃O·C₂H₆OS, (I), 5‐fluorocytosine dimethylacetamide hemisolvate, C₄H₄FN₃O·0.5C₄H₉NO, (II), and 5‐fluorocytosine hemihydrate, C₄H₄FN₃O·0.5H₂O, (III). Similar hydrogen‐bond patterns are observed in all three crystal structures. The 5‐fluorocytosine molecules form ribbons with repeated R₂²(8) dimer interactions. These dimers are stabilized by N—H...N and N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The solvent molecules adopt similar positions with respect to 5‐fluorocytosine. Depending on the hydrogen bonds formed by the solvent, the 5‐fluorocytosine ribbons form layers or tubes. A database study was carried out to compare the hydrogen‐bond pattern of compounds (I)–(III) with those of other (pseudo)polymorphs of 5‐fluorocytosine.     

Four 7‐aryl‐substituted pyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐diones: similar molecular structures but different crystal structures

Molecules of 1,3‐dimethyl‐7‐(4‐methylphenyl)pyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione, C₁₆H₁₅N₃O₂, (I), are linked by paired C—H...O hydrogen bonds to form centrosymmetric R₂²(10) dimers, which are linked into chains by a single π–π stacking interaction. A single C—H...O hydrogen bond links the molecules of 7‐(biphenyl‐4‐yl)‐1,3‐dimethylpyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione, C₂₁H₁₇N₃O₂, (II), into C(10) chains, which are weakly linked into sheets by a π–π stacking interaction. In 7‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐3‐methylpyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione, C₁₄H₁₀FN₃O₂, (III), an N—H...O hydrogen bond links the molecules into C(6) chains, which are linked into sheets by a π–π stacking interaction. The molecules of 7‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐3‐methylpyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione, C₁₅H₁₃N₃O₃, (IV), are also linked into C(6) chains by an N—H...O hydrogen bond, but here the chains are linked into sheets by a combination of two independent C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds.     

Twinning by merohedry in bis(4‐methoxyphenyl)tellurium(IV) diiodide dimethyl sulfoxide hemisolvate

Green crystals of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₄I₂O₂Te·0.5C₂H₆OS, space group P3₂, show twinning by merohedry (class II). The asymmetric unit contains two organotellurium molecules and one dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) molecule. The crystal structure displays secondary Te...I and Te...O(DMSO) bonds that lead to [(4‐MeOC₆H₄)₂TeI₂]₂·DMSO supramolecular units in which the two independent organotellurium molecules are bridged by the DMSO O atom. In addition to these secondary bonds, I...I interactions link translationally equivalent organotellurium molecules to form nearly linear ...I—Te—I...I—Te—I... chains. These chains are crosslinked, forming two‐dimensional arrays parallel to (001). The crystal packing consists of a stacking of these sheets, which are related by the 3₂ axis. This study describes an unusual dimeric arrangement of X—Te—X groups.