2‐Chloro‐3‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐1,4‐naphtho­quinone

The structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₂ClNO₂, (I), comprises essentially planar mol­ecules which crystallize in a monoclinic lattice. C—H?O interactions exist to both naphtho­quinone O atoms and the Cl atom.     

meso‐Bis{η5‐1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl}iron(II) and the cobalt(II) analogue

The two title crystalline compounds, viz.meso‐bis{η⁵‐1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl}iron(II), [Fe(C₁₂H₂₀NSi)₂], (II), and meso‐bis{η⁵‐1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl}cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₂H₂₀NSi)₂], (III), were obtained by the reaction of lithium 1‐[1‐(dimethylamino)ethenyl]‐3‐(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienide with FeCl₂ and CoCl₂, respectively. For (II), the trimethylsilyl‐ and dimethylaminoethenyl‐substituted cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings present a nearly eclipsed conformation, and the two pairs of trimethylsilyl and dimethylaminoethenyl substituents on the Cp rings are arranged in an interlocked fashion. In the case of (III), the same substituted Cp rings are perfectly staggered leading to a crystallographically centrosymmetric molecular structure, and the two trimethylsilyl and two dimethylaminoethenyl substituents are oriented in opposite directions, respectively, with the trimethylsilyl group of one Cp ring and the dimethylaminoethenyl group of the other Cp ring arranged more closely than in (II).     

Three ruthenocene derivatives: (η5‐4,7‐dimethylindenyl)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II), [η5‐[2](4,7)indeno[2]paracyclophanyl](η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II) and bis[η5‐[2](4,7)indeno[2]paracyclophanyl]­ruthenium(II)

In the title compounds, [Ru(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₁H₁₁)], (III), [Ru(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₉H₁₇)], (IV), and [Ru(C₁₉H₁₇)₂], (V), respectively, the coordinating ring systems are planar and parallel, with the Ru atoms lying at perpendicular distances of Ru–Cp* 1.790 (1) Å and Ru–indenyl 1.836 (1) Å in (III), Ru–Cp* 1.791 (1) Å and Ru–indenyl 1.837 (1) Å in (IV), and Ru–indenyl 1.812 (1) Å and 1.809 (1) Å in (V) (Cp* is penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl). The ring conformations are eclipsed for (III), staggered for (IV) and intermediate for (V). All three compounds show short intermolecular contacts from C—H groups to some ring centroids; these could be regarded as C—H?π hydrogen bonds. The mol­ecules of each compound are thus connected via the 2₁ screw axis to form layers parallel to the xy plane.     

(η5‐Cyclopentadienyl)(η6‐phenoxathiin 10,10‐dioxide)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate and phenoxathiin 10,10‐dioxide

In the structure of the title complex salt, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₂H₈O₃S)]PF₆, the coordinated cyclopentadienyl (Cp) and benzene ring planes are almost parallel, with a hinge angle between the planes of 0.8 (2)°. The hinge angle between the planes of the peripheral (coordinated and uncoordinated) benzene rings in the coordinated phenoxathiin 10,10‐dioxide molecule is 169.9 (2)°, and the FeCp moiety is located inside the shallow fold of the heterocycle. The hinge angle between the benzene ring planes in the free heterocycle, C₁₂H₈O₃S, is 171.49 (6)°.     

2‐[2‐(Pyrrolidin‐2‐yl)propan‐2‐yl]‐1H‐pyrrole and its amide derivative 1‐{2‐[2‐(1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl)propan‐2‐yl]pyrrolidin‐1‐yl}ethanone

In the title compounds, C₁₁H₁₈N₂, (II), and C₁₃H₂₀N₂O, (III), the pyrrolidine rings have twist conformations. Compound (II) crystallizes with two independent molecules (A and B) in the asymmetric unit. The mean planes of the pyrrole and pyrrolidine rings are inclined to one another by 89.99 (11) and 89.35 (10)° in molecules A and B, respectively. In (III), the amide derivative of (II), the same dihedral angle is much smaller, at only 13.42 (10)°. In the crystal structure of (II), the individual molecules are linked via N—H...N hydrogen bonds to form inversion dimers, each with an R²₂(12) graph‐set motif. In the crystal structure of (III), the molecules are linked via N—H...O hydrogen bonds to form inversion dimers with an R²₂(16) graph‐set motif.     

(η5‐Cyclopentadienyl)[(1,2,3,4,4a,10a‐η)‐1‐methylthianthrene]iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate acetone 0.33‐solvate

The title complex salt, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₃H₁₀S₂)]PF₆·0.33C₃H₆O, obtained from an acetone–diethyl ether–dichloromethane mixture at 280 (2) K, has three cationic molecules (A–C), three hexafluoridophosphate counter‐anions and one acetone solvent molecule in the asymmetric unit. Two of the three cations contain FeCp (Cp is cyclopentadienyl) inside the fold of the heterocycle. The dihedral angles between the planes of the external (complexed and uncomplexed) benzene rings in the thianthrene molecule are 146.5 (2)° for FeCp‐out‐of‐fold molecule A, and 139.0 (3) and 142.5 (2)° for the two FeCp‐in‐fold molecules B and C, respectively. The complexed Cp and benzene rings in each molecule are almost parallel, with a dihedral angle between the planes of 0.2 (5)° for molecule A, 2.8 (5)° for B, and 2.19 (4) and 6.86 (6)° for the disordered Cp ring in C.     

[(8a,9,9a‐η)‐9‐(η5‐Cyclopentadienyl)‐9‐nickelafluorenyl](η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)nickel(II)

The title compound, [Ni₂(C₅H₅)(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₂H₈)] or [Ni(C₁₀H₁₅){Ni(C₅H₅)(C₁₂H₈)}], is a rare example (and the first obtained from nickelafluorenyllithium) of an analogue of nickelocene in which the central Ni atom is coordinated to one pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ring and one nickelafluorenyl ring. Both rings lie almost parallel to one another: the dihedral angle between the planes which include these rings is 4.4 (1)°. Slip parameter analysis indicates that the bonding mode of the central Ni atom to the nickelacyclic ring is between η³ and η⁵. Two‐dimensional layers of molecules are formed by C—H...π interactions.     

Ethyl β‐{2‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyliminomethyl]‐1‐(phenylsulfonyl)indol‐3‐yl}acrylate

The title compound, C₂₈H₂₇N₃O₄S, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/n, with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. In the indole ring, the dihedral angle between the fused rings is 3.6 (1)°. The phenyl ring of the sulfonyl substituent makes a dihedral angle of 79.2 (1)° with the best plane of the indole moiety. The phenyl ring of the di­methyl­amino­phenyl group is orthogonal to the phenyl ring of the phenyl­sulfonyl group. The dihedral angle formed by the weighted least‐squares planes through the pyrrole ring and the phenyl ring of the di­methyl­amino­phenyl group is 7.8 (1)°. The molecular structure is stabilized by C—H?O and C—H?N interactions.     

Synthesis of Novel 3‐(3‐(5‐Methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐7H‐[1,2,4]Triazolo [3,4‐b][1,3,4]Thiadiazin‐6‐yl)‐2H‐Chromen‐2‐Ones

A novel series of coumarin substituted triazolo‐thiadiazine derivatives were designed and synthesized by using 5‐methyl isoxazole‐3‐carboxylic acid ( 1 ), thiocarbohydrazide ( 2 ), and various substituted 3‐(2‐bromo acetyl) coumarins ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4e , 4d , 4f , 4g , 4h , 4i , 4j ). Fusion of 5‐methyl isoxazole‐3‐carboxylic acid with thiocarbohydrazide resulted in the formation of the intermediate 4‐amino‐5‐(5‐methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐thiol ( 3 ). This intermediate on further reaction with substituted 3‐(2‐bromo acetyl) coumarins under simple reaction conditions formed the title products 3‐(3‐(5‐methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐7H‐[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazin‐6‐yl‐2H‐chromen‐2‐ones ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d , 5e , 5f , 5g , 5h , 5i , 5j ) in good to excellent yields. All the synthesized compounds were well characterized by physical, analytical, and spectroscopic techniques.     

5‐Amino‐4‐(4‐diethyl­amino­phenyl)‐2‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)‐7‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐1,6‐naphthyridine‐8‐carbo­nitrile

In the title compound, C₂₉H₃₀N₆O, the naphthyridine moiety is planar with a dihedral angle between the fused rings of 1.9 (1)°. The phenol ring is nearly coplanar, while the diethyl­amino­phenyl substituent is orthogonal to the central naphthyridine ring and the pyrrolidine ring makes an angle of 11.2 (1)° with it. The O atom of the hydroxy substituent is coplanar with the phenyl ring to which it is attached. The molecular structure is stabilized by a C—H?N‐type intramolecular hydrogen bond and the packing is stabilized by intermolecular C—H?π, O—H?N and N—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Dichloro{N‐[3‐(η5‐cyclopentadienyl)propyl]‐4‐toluenesulfonamido‐κ2N,O}titanium(IV)

The title compound, [Ti(C₁₅H₁₇NO₂S)Cl₂], has a Ti atom bound to the N and O atoms of a p‐toluene­sulfon­amide ligand, which is tethered by a three‐carbon chain to a η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl group. The distorted square‐pyramidal geometry is completed by two Cl atoms. The Ti—N bond length of 2.0375 (13) Å is longer than that in related compounds, the N atom having asymmetric trigonal–planar geometry. Conformational strain relief is noted when compared with ethyl‐tethered compounds.     

1‐(β‐d‐Erythrofuranos­yl)cytidine (β‐erythrocytidine)

1‐(β‐d ‐Erythrofuranosyl)cytidine, C₈H₁₁N₃O₄, (I), a derivative of β‐cytidine, (II), lacks an exocyclic hydroxy­methyl (–CH₂OH) substituent at C4′ and crystallizes in a global conformation different from that observed for (II). In (I), the β‐d ‐erythrofuranosyl ring assumes an E₃ conformation (C3′‐exo; S, i.e. south), and the N‐glycoside bond conformation is syn. In contrast, (II) contains a β‐d ‐ribofuranosyl ring in a ³T₂ conformation (N, i.e. north) and an anti‐N‐glycoside linkage. These crystallographic properties mimic those found in aqueous solution by NMR with respect to furan­ose conformation. Removal of the –CH₂OH group thus affects the global conformation of the aldofuranosyl ring. These results provide further support for S/syn–anti and N/anti correlations in pyrimidine nucleosides. The crystal structure of (I) was determined at 200 K.     

(η6‐Bi­phenyl)­tri­carbonyl­chromium and μ‐(η6:η6)‐bi­phenyl‐bis­(tricarbonyl­chromium)

The title compounds, [Cr(C₁₂H₁₀)(CO)₃] and [Cr₂(C₁₂H₁₀)(CO)₆], serve as a fundamental standard of comparison for other mono‐ and polysubstituted (η⁶‐bi­phenyl)­tri­carbonyl­chromium compounds. (η⁶‐Bi­phenyl)­tri­carbonyl­chromium has a typical piano‐stool coordination about the Cr center, and the dihedral angle between the planes of the phenyl rings is 23.55 (5)°. The corresponding angle in μ‐(η⁶:η⁶)‐bi­phenyl‐bis­(tri­carbonyl­chromium) is 0° because the mol­ecule occupies a crystallographic inversion center; the Cr atoms reside on opposite sides of the bi­phenyl ligand. Density functional theory and natural bonding orbital theory analyses were used to scrutinize the geometry of these and closely related compounds to explain important structural features.     

Synthesis of 6‐(5‐Methylisoxazol‐3yl)‐3‐alkyl Sulfanyl‐[1,2,4]triazolo‐[3,4‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazoles

A new series of isoxazole substituted fused triazolo‐thiadiazoles have been synthesized by the cyclocondensation of 5‐methylisoxazole‐3‐craboxylic acid and 4‐amino 1,2‐4‐triazole‐ 3,5‐dithiol using phosphorous oxychloride. The cyclised intermediate 6‐(5‐methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazole‐3‐thiol later on S‐alkylated with different alkyl halides in ethanol to give the title products in good to excellent yields.     

Trapping of Tricarbonyl(η1,η2‐homoallyl)iron and Tricarbonyl(η3‐allyl)iron Anion Intermediates with 2‐(Phenylsulfonyl)‐3‐phenyloxaziridine

The addition of reactive carbanions to (η⁴‐1,3‐diene)Fe(CO)₃ complexes at ?78 °C and 25 °C produced putative homoallyl and allyl anion complexes, respectively. Reaction of the reactive intermediates with 2‐(phenylsulfonyl)‐3‐phenyloxaziridine afforded nucleophilic substituted (η⁴‐1,3‐diene)Fe(CO)₃ complexes.     

Quantification of the β‐Stabilizing Effect of the Dicarbonyl(η5‐cyclopentadienyl)iron Group

Kinetic investigations of the reactions of (prop‐2‐enyl)dicarbonyl(cyclopentadienyl)iron complexes 1 with benzhydrylium ions 3 , and of dicarbonyl(cyclopentadienyl)[(1,2‐η)propene]iron(II) tetrafluoroborate ( 9 ⋅BF₄) with π‐nucleophiles have been performed to elucidate the magnitude of the β‐effect of the [(CO)₂FeCp] group (Fp group). Introduction of the Fp group into the allylic position of propene and 2‐methylpropene increases the nucleophilicity of the π‐bonds by nine and six orders of magnitude, respectively, with the result that the allyl‐Fp complexes 1a (N=6.78) and 1b (N=8.45) are among the strongest neutral π‐nucleophiles. Replacement of one β‐H‐atom in the isopropyl cation by the Fp group reduces the electrophilicity by more than 20 orders of magnitude, so that 9 ⁺ ranks among the weakest cationic C‐electrophiles (E=−11.2).     

The solid‐state emmissive chalcone (2E)‐1‐(5‐chlorothiophen‐2‐yl)‐3‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]prop‐2‐en‐1‐one

Orange rectangular blocks suitable for X‐ray diffraction analysis were obtained for the previously reported [Ahmad & Bano (2011). Int. J. ChemTech Res. 3 , 1470–1478] title chalcone, C₁₅H₁₄ClNOS. This solid‐emissive chalcone exhibits a planar structure and the bond parameters are compared with related compounds already described in the literature. The determination of the structure of this chalcone is quite relevant because it will play an important role in theoretical calculations to investigate potential two‐photon absorption processes and could also be useful for studying the interaction of such compounds with a biological target.     

Tris­[2‐(2‐oxazolin‐2‐yl)­phenolato]­iron(III)

The title compound, tris­[2‐(4,5‐dihydrooxazol‐2‐yl‐κN)phenolato‐κO]­iron(III), [Fe(C₉H₈NO₂)₃], is disordered over a non‐crystallographic twofold rotation axis perpendicular to the crystallographic threefold rotation axis. The disorder can be a pure rotational disorder of an iron complex in the facial configuration, or the consequence of a mixture of facial and meridional configurations. In the latter case, at least 25% of the iron complexes must adopt the facial configuration in order to obtain the disorder ratio observed in the crystal.