A dimeric constrained‐geometry titanium complex linked by double Ti–CH2–Al–CH2 heterocycles

In the structure of bis({N‐[di­methyl(1η⁵‐2,3,4,6‐tetra­methyl­in­den­yl)­silyl]­cyclo­hexyl­amido‐1κN}(methyl‐3κC)‐di‐μ₃‐methyl­ene‐1:2:3κ³C;1:3:3′κ³C‐tris(pentafluorophenyl‐2κC)titanium) benzene disolvate, [Me₂Si(η⁵‐2,3,4,6‐Me₄C₉H₂)(C₆H₁₁N)]Ti[(μ₃‐CH₂)Al(C₆F₅)₃][AlMe(μ₃‐CH₂)]₂ or [Ti₂(C₂₁H₇AlF₁₅)₂(C₂₁H₃₁NSi)₂]·2C₆D₆, the dimer is located on an inversion center, and the two Ti centers are linked by double Ti(μ₃‐CH₂)Al(C₆F₅)₃AlMe(μ₃‐CH₂) heterocycles. The electron‐deficient Ti centers are further stabilized by two α‐agostic interactions between Ti and one H atom of each bridging methyl­ene group.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.     

Two dimeric CuII benzoate derivatives solvated with aceto­nitrile

The title compounds, tetrakis(μ‐benzoato‐O:O′)­bis(2,6‐di­amino­pyridine)‐1κN,2κN‐dicopper(II)–aceto­nitrile (1/2), [Cu₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₅H₇N₃)₂]·2C₂H₃N, (I), and bis­(aceto­nitrile)‐1κN,2κN‐tetrakis(μ‐benzoato‐O:O′)­dicopper(II)–aceto­nitrile (1/1.5), [Cu₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₂H₃N)₂]·1.5C₂H₃N, (II), crystallize as aceto­nitrile solvates exhibiting different stability. They have similar molecular structures with discrete dimeric units located at crystallographic inversion centres. The copper ions are bridged by four benzoate groups and neutral N‐donor ligands, viz. 2,6‐di­amino­pyridine in (I) and aceto­nitrile in (II), are coordinated at apical positions. The diverse stability is probably due to hydrogen‐bond interactions of the solvated aceto­nitrile mol­ecules with neighbouring dimers in compound (I).     

Lewis Base Behavior of Bridging Nitrido Ligands of Titanium Polynuclear Complexes

The Lewis base behavior of μ₃‐nitrido ligands of the polynuclear titanium complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1 ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2 ) to MX Lewis acids has been observed for the first time. Complex 1 entraps one equivalent of copper(I ) halide or copper(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate through the basal NH imido groups to give cube‐type adducts [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] (X=Cl ( 3 ), Br ( 4 ), I ( 5 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 6 )). However, the treatment of 1 with an excess (≥2 equiv) of copper reagents afforded complexes [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₄‐N)(CuX)}] (X=Cl ( 7 ), Br ( 8 ), I ( 9 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 10 )) by incorporation of an additional CuX fragment at the μ₃‐N nitrido apical group. Similarly, the tetranuclear cube‐type nitrido derivative 2 is capable of incorporating one, two, or up to three CuX units at the μ₃‐N ligands to give complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)_4?n{(μ₄‐N)CuX}_n] (X=Br ( 11 ), n=1; X=Cl ( 12 ), n=2; X=OSO₂CF₃ ( 13 ), n=3). Compound 2 also reacts with silver(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate (≥1 equiv) to give the adduct [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₃{(μ₄‐N)AgOSO₂CF₃}] ( 14 ). X‐ray crystal structure determinations have been performed for complexes 8 – 13 . Density functional theory calculations have been carried out to understand the nature and strength of the interactions of [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1′ ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2′ ) model complexes with copper and silver MX fragments. Although coordination through the three basal NH imido groups is thermodynamically preferred in the case of 1′ , in both complexes the μ₃‐nitrido groups act as two‐electron donor Lewis bases to the appropriate Lewis acids.     

Molecular Nitrides with Titanium and Group 13–15 Elements

Several heterometallic nitrido complexes were prepared by reaction of the imido–nitrido titanium complex [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1 ) with amido derivatives of Group 13–15 elements. Treatment of 1 with bis(trimethylsilyl)amido [M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃] derivatives of aluminum, gallium, or indium in toluene at 150–190 °C affords the single‐cube amidoaluminum complex [{(Me₃Si)₂N}Al{(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] ( 2 ) or the corner‐shared double‐cube compounds [M(μ₃‐N)₃(μ₃‐NH)₃{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] [M=Ga ( 3 ), In ( 4 )]. Complexes 3 and 4 were also obtained by treatment of 1 with the trialkyl derivatives [M(CH₂SiMe₃)₃] (M=Ga, In) at high temperatures. The analogous reaction of 1 with [{Ga(NMe₂)₃}₂] at 110 °C leads to [{Ga(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] ( 5 ), in which two [GaTi₃N₄] cube‐type moieties are linked through a gallium–gallium bond. Complex 1 reacts with one equivalent of germanium, tin, or lead bis(trimethylsilyl)amido derivatives [M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] in toluene at room temperature to give cube‐type complexes [M{(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] [M=Ge ( 6 ), Sn ( 7 ), Pb ( 8 )]. Monitoring the reaction of 1 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] and [Sn(C₅H₅)₂] by NMR spectroscopy allows the identification of intermediates [RSn{(μ₃‐N)(μ₃‐NH)₂Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] [R=N(SiMe₃)₂ ( 9 ), C₅H₅ ( 10 )] in the formation of 7 . Addition of one equivalent of the metalloligand 1 to a solution of lead derivative 8 or the treatment of 1 with a half equivalent of [Pb{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] afford the corner‐shared double‐cube compound [Pb(μ₃‐N)₂(μ₃‐NH)₄{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] ( 11 ). Analogous antimony and bismuth derivatives [M(μ₃‐N)₃(μ₃‐NH)₃{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}₂] [M=Sb ( 12 ), Bi ( 13 )] were obtained through the reaction of 1 with the tris(dimethylamido) reagents [M(NMe₂)₃]. Treatment of 1 with [AlCl₂{N(SiMe₃)₂}(OEt₂)] affords the precipitation of the singular aluminum–titanium square‐pyramidal aggregate [{{(Me₃Si)₂N}Cl₃Al₂}(μ₃‐N)(μ₃‐NH)₂{Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ‐Cl)(μ₃‐N)}] ( 14 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 , 11 , 13 , 14 , and [AlCl{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] were determined.     

Structure and spectroscopic properties of the dimeric copper(I) N‐heterocyclic carbene complex [Cu2(CNCt‐Bu)2](PF6)2

In recent years, the use of copper N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes has expanded to fields besides catalysis, namely medicinal chemistry and luminescence applications. In the latter case, multinuclear copper NHC compounds have attracted interest, however, the number of these complexes in the literature is still quite limited. Bis[μ‐1,3‐bis(3‐tert‐butylimidazolin‐2‐yliden‐1‐yl)pyridine]‐1κ⁴C²,N:N,C^2′;2κ⁴C²,N:N,C^2′‐dicopper(I) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Cu₂(C₁₉H₂₅N₅)₂](PF₆)₂, is a dimeric copper(I) complex bridged by two CNC, i.e. bis(N‐heterocyclic carbene)pyridine, ligands. Each Cu^I atom is almost linearly coordinated by two NHC ligands and interactions are observed between the pyridine N atoms and the metal centres, while no cuprophilic interactions were observed. Very strong absorption bands are evident in the UV–Vis spectrum at 236 and 274 nm, and an emission band is observed at 450 nm. The reported complex is a new example of a multinuclear copper NHC complex and a member of a compound class which has only rarely been reported.     

The conformations of two copper(I) complexes of 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione and thiosaccharinate

(Acetonitrile‐1κN)[μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S][1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐2κS]bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₂(CH₃CN)] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₂(CH₃CN)] [tsac is thiosaccharinate and Sbim is 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione], (I), is a new copper(I) compound that consists of a triply bridged dinuclear Cu—Cu unit. In the complex molecule, two tsac anions and one neutral Sbim ligand bind the metals. One anion bridges via the endocyclic N and exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:N). The other anion and one of the mercaptobenzimidazole molecules bridge the metals through their exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:S). The second Sbim ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion (κS) to one Cu atom, while an acetonitrile molecule coordinates to the other Cu atom. The Cu^I—Cu^I distance [2.6286 (6) Å] can be considered a strong `cuprophilic' interaction. In the case of [μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S]bis[1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione]‐1κS;2κS‐bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₃] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₃], (II), the acetonitrile molecule is substituted by an additional Sbim ligand, which binds one Cu atom via the exocylic S atom. In this case, the Cu^I—Cu^I distance is 2.6068 (11) Å.     

Synthesis and Ligand Modification Chemistry of a Molybdenum Dinitrogen Complex: Redox and Chemical Activity of a Bis(imino)pyridine Ligand

The bis(imino)pyridine 2,6‐(2,6‐iPr₂‐C₆H₃N?CPh)₂‐C₅H₃N (^iPrBPDI) molybdenum dinitrogen complex, [{(^iPrBPDI)Mo(N₂)}₂(μ₂,η¹,η¹‐N₂)] has been prepared and contains both weakly (terminal) and modestly (bridging) activated N₂ ligands. Addition of ammonia resulted in sequential N? H bond activations, thus forming bridging parent imido (μ‐NH) ligands with concomitant reduction of one of the imines of the supporting chelate. Using primary and secondary amines, model intermediates have been isolated that highlight the role of metal–ligand cooperativity in NH₃ oxidation.     

Stabilization of a Silaaldehyde by its η2 Coordination to Tungsten

Treatment of pyridine‐stabilized silylene complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂(H)W?SiH(py)(Tsi)] (R=Me, Et; py=pyridine; Tsi=C(SiMe₃)₃) with an N‐heterocyclic carbene ^MeIⁱPr (1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) caused deprotonation to afford anionic silylene complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂W?SiH(Tsi)][H^MeIⁱPr] (R=Me ( 1‐Me ); R=Et ( 1‐Et )). Subsequent oxidation of 1‐Me and 1‐Et with pyridine‐N‐oxide (1 equiv) gave anionic η²‐silaaldehydetungsten complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂W{η²‐O?SiH(Tsi)}][H^MeIⁱPr] (R=Me ( 2‐Me ); R=Et ( 2‐Et )). The formation of an unprecedented W‐Si‐O three‐membered ring was confirmed by X‐ray crystal structure analysis.     

Synthesis of ReI tricarbonyl complexes with various sulfur‐ and oxygen‐donating ligands: crystal structures of two ReI dinuclear structures bridged by S atoms

The synthesis and characterization of two dinuclear complexes, namely fac‐hexacarbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ³C‐(pyridine‐1κN)[μ‐2,2′‐sulfanediyldi(ethanethiolato)‐1κ²S¹,S³:2κ³S¹,S²,S³]dirhenium(I), [Re₂(C₄H₈S₃)(C₅H₅N)(CO)₆], ( 1 ), and tetraethylammonium fac‐tris(μ‐2‐methoxybenzenethiolato‐κ²S:S)bis[tricarbonylrhenium(I)], (C₈H₂₀N)[Re₂(C₇H₇OS)₃(CO)₆], ( 2 ), together with two mononuclear complexes, namely (2,2′‐bithiophene‐5‐carboxylic acid‐κ²S,S′)bromidotricarbonylrhenium(I), ( 3 ), and bromidotricarbonyl(methyl benzo[b]thiophene‐2‐carboxylate‐κ²O,S)rhenium(I), ( 4 ), are reported. Crystals of ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) were characterized by X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure of ( 1 ) revealed two Re—S—Re bridges. The thioether S atom only bonds to one of the Re^I metal centres, while the geometry of the second Re^I metal centre is completed by a pyridine ligand. The structure of ( 2 ) is characterized by three S‐atom bridges and an Re…Re nonbonding distance of 3.4879 (5) Å, which is shorter than the distance found for ( 1 ) [3.7996 (6)/3.7963 (6) Å], but still clearly a nonbonding distance. Complex ( 1 ) is stabilized by six intermolecular hydrogen‐bond interactions and an O…O interaction, while ( 2 ) is stabilized by two intermolecular hydrogen‐bond interactions and two O…π interactions.     

Reactions of Organic Azides with Half‐sandwich Complexes of Iridium: Preparation of Mono‐ and Bis(imine) Derivatives

Imine complexes [IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}{P(OR)₃}]BPh₄ ( 1 , 2 ) (Ar = C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄; R = Me, Et) were prepared by allowing chloro complexes [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){P(OR)₃}] to react with benzyl azides ArCH₂N₃. Bis(imine) complexes [Ir(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}₂{P(OR)₃}](BPh₄)₂ ( 3 , 4 ) were also prepared by reacting [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){P(OR)₃}] first with AgOTf and then with benzyl azide. Depending on the experimental conditions, treatment of the dinuclear complex [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)]₂ with benzyl azide yielded mono‐ [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}] ( 5 ) and bis‐[IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)Ar}₂]BPh₄ ( 6 ) imine derivatives. In contrast, treatment of chloro complexes [IrCl₂(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){P(OR)₃}] with phenyl azide C₆H₅N₃ gave amine derivatives [IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(C₆H₅NH₂){P(OR)₃}]BPh₄ ( 7 , 8 ). The complexes were characterized spectroscopically (IR, NMR) and by X‐ray crystal structure determination of [IrCl(η⁵‐C₅Me₅){κ¹‐NH=C(H)C₆H₄‐4‐CH₃}{P(OEt)₃}]BPh₄ ( 2b ).     

3‐Rhoda‐1,2‐diazacyclopentanes: A Series of Novel Metallacycle Complexes Derived From CN Functionalization of Ethylene

Rh‐containing metallacycles, [(TPA)Rh^III(κ²‐(C,N)‐CH₂CH₂(NR)₂‐]Cl; TPA=N,N,N,N‐tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine have been accessed through treatment of the Rh^I ethylene complex, [(TPA)Rh(η²‐CH₂CH₂)]Cl ([ 1 ]Cl) with substituted diazenes. We show this methodology to be tolerant of electron‐deficient azo compounds including azo diesters (RCO₂N?NCO₂R; R=Et [ 3 ]Cl, R=iPr [ 4 ]Cl, R=tBu [ 5 ]Cl, and R=Bn [ 6 ]Cl) and a cyclic azo diamide: 4‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3,5‐dione (PTAD), [ 7 ]Cl. The latter complex features two ortho‐fused ring systems and constitutes the first 3‐rhoda‐1,2‐diazabicyclo[3.3.0]octane. Preliminary evidence suggests that these complexes result from N–N coordination followed by insertion of ethylene into a [Rh]?N bond. In terms of reactivity, [ 3 ]Cl and [ 4 ]Cl successfully undergo ring‐opening using p‐toluenesulfonic acid, affording the Rh chlorides, [(TPA)Rh^III(Cl)(κ¹‐(C)‐CH₂CH₂(NCO₂R)(NHCO₂R)]OTs; [ 13 ]OTs and [ 14 ]OTs. Deprotection of [ 5 ]Cl using trifluoroacetic acid was also found to give an ethyl substituted, end‐on coordinated diazene [(TPA)Rh^III(κ²‐(C,N)‐CH₂CH₂(NH)₂‐]⁺ [ 16 ]Cl, a hitherto unreported motif. Treatment of [ 16 ]Cl with acetyl chloride resulted in the bisacetylated adduct [(TPA)Rh^III(κ²‐(C,N)‐CH₂CH₂(NAc)₂‐]⁺, [ 17 ]Cl. Treatment of [ 1 ]Cl with AcN?NAc did not give the Rh?N insertion product, but instead the N,O‐chelated complex [(TPA)Rh^I ( κ²‐(O,N)‐CH₃(CO)(NH)(N?C(CH₃)(OCH?CH₂))]Cl [ 23 ]Cl, presumably through insertion of ethylene into a [Rh]?O bond.     

Constructing mixed‐metal coordination polymers from copper(II)–pyridinedicarboxylate metalloligands

In the mixed‐metal complex catena‐poly[bis[diaquasilver(I)] [bis[aquacopper(II)]‐μ₃‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐2′:1:1′κ⁵N,O²:O⁵:O⁵,O^5′‐μ‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐2:1κ⁴N,O²:O⁵,O^5′‐disilver(I)‐μ₃‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐1:1′:2′′κ⁵O⁵,O^5′:O⁵:N,O²‐μ‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐1′:2′′′κ⁴O⁵,O^5′:N,O²] hexahydrate], {[Ag(H₂O)₂][AgCu(C₇H₃NO₄)₂(H₂O)]·3H₂O}_n, a square‐pyramidal Cu^II center is coordinated by two N atoms and two O atoms from two pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylate (2,5‐pydc) ligands and a water molecule, forming a [Cu(2,5‐pydc)₂(H₂O)]²⁻ metalloligand. One Ag^I center is coordinated by five O atoms from three 2,5‐pydc ligands and, as a result, the [Cu(2,5‐pydc)₂(H₂O)]²⁻ metalloligands act as linkers in a unique μ₃‐mode connecting Ag^I centers into a one‐dimensional anionic double chain along the [101] direction. The other Ag^I center is coordinated by two water molecules, forming an [Ag(H₂O)₂]⁺ cation. Four adjacent Ag^I centers are associated by Ag...Ag interactions [3.126 (1) and 3.118 (1) Å], producing a Z‐shaped Ag₄ unit along the [010] direction and connecting the anionic chains into a two‐dimensional layer structure. This study offers information for engineering mixed‐metal complexes based on copper(II)–pyridinedicarboxylate metalloligands.     

Self‐assembly of a mixed‐ligand silver‐based coordination polymer

The novel title silver(I) coordination polymer, catena‐poly­[[aceto­nitrile­silver(I)]‐di‐μ‐4‐[N‐(di­phenyl­phosphino)­amino­meth­yl]­pyridine‐κ²N¹:P;κ²P:N¹‐[aceto­nitrile­silver(I)]‐μ₃‐4‐[N,N‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­amino­methyl]­pyridine‐κ³N¹:P:P′‐bis­[aceto­nitrile­silver(I)(Ag—Ag)]‐μ₃‐4‐[N,N‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­amino­methyl]­pyridine‐κ³P:P′:N¹] tetra­kis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) aceto­nitrile trisolvate], {[Ag₄(C₂H₃N)₄(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)₂(C₃₀H₂₆N₂P₂)₂](BF₄)₄·3C₂H₃N}_n, is formed by the self‐assembly of the Ph₂P(4‐NHCH₂C₅H₄N) and (Ph₂P)₂(4‐NCH₂C₅H₄N) ligands with silver tetra­fluoro­borate. The polymer consists of alternating rings (which lie about inversion centers) bridged by the pyridyl rings of the bis‐phosphine‐substituted ligands, with anions hydrogen bonded the length of the chain. Two distinctly different metal coordination environments exist in the polymer, viz. distorted tetrahedral and trigonal geometries.     

A dimeric heteroleptic five‐coordinate zinc(II) complex containing a non‐motionally restricted N,N′‐heterocyclic ligand

The title compound, bis(μ‐1,2‐benzene­thiol­ato)‐1:2κ³S,S′:S′;2:1κ³S,S′:S′‐bis­[(2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N,N′)­zinc(II)], [Zn₂(μ‐C₆H₄S₂)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂], crystallizes with the dinuclear mol­ecule located on a center of symmetry. The coordination geometry about the Zn atom is a modestly distorted trigonal bipyramid, with the axial ligating atoms at an angle of 170.81 (4)° and the angles in the equatorial plane in the range 112.94 (4)–129.95 (4)°. Weak π‐stacking interactions between bi­pyridine ligands on adjacent mol­ecules [interplanar spacing = 3.315 (3) Å] and a possible weak intermolecular C—H⋯S hydrogen bond (H⋯S = 2.84 Å) are seen in the crystal.     

The coordination chemistry of two symmetric double‐armed oxadiazole‐bridged organic ligands with copper salts

Two new symmetric double‐armed oxadiazole‐bridged ligands, 4‐methyl‐{5‐[5‐methyl‐2‐(pyridin‐3‐ylcarbonyloxy)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl}phenyl pyridine‐3‐carboxylate (L1) and 4‐methyl‐{5‐[5‐methyl‐2‐(pyridin‐4‐ylcarbonyloxy)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl}phenyl pyridine‐4‐carboxylate (L2), were prepared by the reaction of 2,5‐bis(2‐hydroxy‐5‐methylphenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole with nicotinoyl chloride and isonicotinoyl chloride, respectively. Ligand L1 can be used as an organic clip to bind Cu^II cations and generate a molecular complex, bis(4‐methyl‐{5‐[5‐methyl‐2‐(pyridin‐3‐ylcarbonyloxy)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl}phenyl pyridine‐3‐carboxylate)bis(perchlorato)copper(II), [Cu(ClO₄)₂(C₂₈H₂₀N₄O₅)₂], (I). In compound (I), the Cu^II cation is located on an inversion centre and is hexacoordinated in a distorted octahedral geometry, with the pyridine N atoms of two L1 ligands in the equatorial positions and two weakly coordinating perchlorate counter‐ions in the axial positions. The two arms of the L1 ligands bend inward and converge at the Cu^II coordination point to give rise to a spirometallocycle. Ligand L2 binds Cu^I cations to generate a supramolecule, diacetonitriledi‐μ₃‐iodido‐di‐μ₂‐iodido‐bis(4‐methyl‐{5‐[5‐methyl‐2‐(pyridin‐4‐ylcarbonyloxy)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl}phenyl pyridine‐4‐carboxylate)tetracopper(I), [Cu₄I₄(CH₃CN)₂(C₂₈H₂₀N₄O₅)₂], (II). The asymmetric unit of (II) indicates that it contains two Cu^I atoms, one L2 ligand, one acetonitrile ligand and two iodide ligands. Both of the Cu^I atoms are four‐coordinated in an approximately tetrahedral environment. The molecule is centrosymmetric and the four I atoms and four Cu^I atoms form a rope‐ladder‐type [Cu₄I₄] unit. Discrete units are linked into one‐dimensional chains through π–π interactions.     

Dimeric copper(II) trimethylsilyl­acetate adducts with pyridine, 2‐­methylpyridine, 3‐methylpyridine and quinoline,and a polymeric copper(II) trimethylsilylacetate

In the crystals of bis(pyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₅H₅N)₂], (I), the dinuclear Cu^II complexes have cage structures with Cu?Cu distances of 2.632 (1) and 2.635 (1) Å. In the crystals of bis(2‐­methylpyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (II), bis­(3‐methylpyridine‐N)tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (III), and bis(quinoline‐N)­tetrakis(μ‐­trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄(C₉H₇N)₂], (IV), the centrosymmetric dinuclear Cu^II complexes have a cage structure with Cu?Cu distances of 2.664 (1), 2.638 (3) and 2.665 (1) Å, respectively. In the crystals of catena‐poly­[tetrakis(μ‐trimethylsilylacetato‐O:O′)dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₅H₁₁O₂Si)₄]_n, (V), the dinuclear Cu^II units of a cage structure are linked by the cyclic Cu—O bonds at the apical positions to form a linear chain by use of a glide translation.     

Experimental and Computational Studies on the Reactivity of a Terminal Thorium Imidometallocene towards Organic Azides and Diazoalkanes

The reaction of the base‐free terminal thorium imido complex [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th?N(p‐tolyl)] ( 1 ) with p‐azidotoluene yielded irreversibly the tetraazametallacyclopentene [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th{N(p‐tolyl)N?N? N(p‐tolyl)}] ( 2 ), whereas the bridging imido complex [{[η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]Th(N₃)₂}₂{μ‐N(p‐tolyl)}₂][(n‐C₄H₉)₄N]₂ ( 3 ) was isolated from the reaction of 1 with [(n‐C₄H₉)₄N]N₃. Unexpectedly, upon the treatment of 1 with 9‐diazofluorene, the NN bond was cleaved, an N atom was transferred, and the η²‐diazenido iminato complex [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th{η²‐[N?N(p‐tolyl)]}{N?(9‐C₁₃H₈)}] ( 4 ) was formed. In contrast, the reaction of 1 with Me₃SiCHN₂ gave the nitrilimido complex [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th{NH(p‐tolyl)}{N₂CSiMe₃}] ( 5 ), which slowly converted into [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}{η⁵:κ‐N‐1,2‐(Me₃C)₂‐4‐CMe₂(CH₂NN?CHSiMe₃)C₅H₂}Th{NH(p‐tolyl)}] ( 6 ) by intramolecular C? H bond activation. The experimental results are complemented by density functional theory (DFT) studies.     

A novel two‐dimensional metal–organic supramolecular framework including π–π stacking and hydrogen‐bond interactions

[μ‐N,N′‐Bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxamide‐<!?show [forcelb]><!?tlsb=0.12pt>1:2κ²N:N′]bis{[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxamide‐κN]diiodidomercury(II)}, [Hg₂I₄(C₁₈H₁₄N₄O₂)₃], is an S‐shaped dinuclear molecule, composed of two HgI₂ units and three N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxamide (L) ligands. The central L ligand is centrosymmetric and coordinated to two Hg^II cations via two pyridine N atoms, in a syn–syn conformation. The two terminal L ligands are monodentate, with one uncoordinated pyridine N atom, and each adopts a syn–anti conformation. The HgI₂ units show highly distorted tetrahedral (sawhorse) geometry, as the Hg^II centres lie only 0.34 (2) or 0.32 (2) Å from the planes defined by the I and pyridine N atoms. Supramolecular interactions, thermal stability and solid‐state luminescence properties were also measured.     

The Potential of Molybdenum Complexes Bearing Unsubstituted Heterodiatomic Group 15 Elements as Linkers in Supramolecular Chemistry

The reactions of tetrahedral molybdenum complexes bearing unsubstituted heterodiatomic Group 15 elements, [Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄(μ,η²:η²‐PE)] (Cp=C₅H₅; E=As ( 1 ), Sb ( 2 )), with Cu^I halides afforded seven unprecedented neutral supramolecular assemblies. Depending on the Mo₂PE units and the Cu^I halide, the oligomers [?{Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄}{μ₄,η²:η²:η²:η¹‐PE}?₄?{CuX}{Cu(μ‐X)}?₂] (E=As (X=Cl ( 3 ), Br ( 4 )); E=Sb (X=Cl ( 6 ), Br ( 7 ))) or the 1D coordination polymers [{Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄}{μ₄,η²:η²:η¹:η¹‐PAs}{Cu(μ‐I)}]_n ( 5 ) and [{Cp₂Mo₂(CO)₄}{μ₄,η²:η²:η²:η¹‐PSb}₂{Cu(μ‐X)}₃]_n (X=I ( 8 ), Br ( 9 )) are accessible. These solid‐state aggregates are the first and only examples featuring the organometallic heterodiatomic Mo₂PE complexes 1 and 2 as linking moieties. DFT calculations demonstrate that complexes 1 and 2 present a unique class of mixed‐donor ligands coordinating to Cu^I centers via the P lone pair and the P?E σ‐bond, revealing an unprecedented coordination mode.