Two polymorphic forms of N‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐5‐[(4‐chlorophenyl)aminomethyl]‐6‐methyl‐2‐phenyl­pyrimidin‐4‐amine

Two polymorphic forms of the title compound, C₂₄H₂₀Cl₂N₄, were obtained and characterized using X‐ray crystal structure analysis. Colourless crystals of polymorph (Ia) were obtained from the oily mother residue. Recrystallization of polymorph (Ia) from an acetone–methanol mixture resulted in pale‐yellow crystals of polymorph (Ib). The major feature distinguishing the two polymorphic forms is their inter­action modes, and hence their packing arrangements. In the crystal structure of polymorph (Ia), there are N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and also aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions between mol­ecules. The mol­ecules of polymorph (Ib) are linked by N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds only.     

2‐Ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate,its 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone and dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvates and a corrected structure of 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)di(4,5‐dihydroimidazolium) bis(4‐aminobenzenesulfonate) dihydrate

2‐Ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate, C₇H₈ClNO₃S, (Ia), is an intermediate in the synthesis of lake red azo pigments. The present structure determination from single‐crystal data confirms the results of a previous powder diffraction determination [Bekö, Thoms, Brüning, Alig, van de Streek, Lakatos, Glaubitz & Schmidt (2010). Z. Kristallogr. 225 , 382–387]. The zwitterionic tautomeric form is confirmed. During a polymorph screening, two additional pseudopolymorphs were obtained, viz. 2‐ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone monosolvate, C₇H₈ClNO₃S·C₅H₉NO, (Ib), and 2‐ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₇H₈ClNO₃S·C₂H₆OS, (Ic). The molecules of (Ib) have crystallographic m symmetry. The 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone solvent molecule has an envelope conformation and is disordered around the mirror plane. The structure shows hydrogen‐bonded ladders of molecules [graph‐set notation C₂²(6)R₂²(12)] in the [010] direction. The benzene groups of adjacent ladders are also stacked in this direction. A different type of hydrogen‐bonded ladder [graph‐set notation C(6)R₂²(4)R₄⁴(12)] occurs in (Ic). In (Ia), (Ib) and (Ic), the molecules correspond to the zwitterionic tautomer. The structure of the cocrystal of 4‐aminobenzenesulfonic acid with 1,4‐bis(4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐yl)benzene [Shang, Ren, Wang, Lu & Yang (2009). Acta Cryst. E 65 , o2221–o2222] is corrected; it actually contains 4‐aminobenzenesulfonate anions and 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)di(dihydroimidazolium) dications, i.e. 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)di(4,5‐dihydroimidazolium) bis(4‐aminobenzenesulfonate) dihydrate, C₁₂H₁₆N₄²⁺·2C₆H₆NO₃S⁻·2H₂O. Hence, all known structures of aminobenzenesulfonic acid complexes contain ionic or zwitterionic molecules; there is no known structure with a neutral aminobenzenesulfonic acid molecule.     

Polymorphism of 2,5‐[(diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]‐1,1,2,4,4,5‐hexaphenyl‐1,4‐diphospha‐2,5‐diboracyclohexane

2,5‐[(Diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]‐1,1,2,4,4,5‐hexaphenyl‐1,4‐diphospha‐2,5‐diboracyclohexane shows polymorphism as two tetrahydrofuran (THF) disolvates [C₆₄H₅₈B₂P₄·2C₄H₈O, (Ia) and (Ib)] and pseudo‐polymorphism as its toluene monosolvate [C₆₄H₅₈B₂P₄·C₇H₈, (Ic)]. In each of polymorphs (Ia) and (Ib), the diphosphadiboracyclohexane molecule is located on a centre of inversion. The THF molecule of (Ib) is disordered over two sites, with a site‐occupation factor of 0.612 (8) for the major‐occupied site. Both structures crystallize in the same space group (P2₁/n), but they display a different crystal packing. For pseudo‐polymorph (Ic), although the space group is P2₁/c, which is just a different setting of the P2₁/n space group of (Ia) and (Ib), the crystal packing is completely different. Although the crystal packing in these three structures is significantly different, their molecular conformations are surprisingly the same.     

Enantiotropic phase transition and twinning in 2,2,3,3,4,4‐hexafluoropentane‐1,5‐diol

Four crystal structure determinations of 2,2,3,3,4,4‐hexafluoropentane‐1,5‐diol (HFPD), C₅H₆F₆O₂, were conducted on a single specimen by varying the temperature. Two polymorphs of HFPD were found to be enantiotropically related as phases (I) and (II), both in the space group P1. These structures contain closely related R₄⁴(20) sheets. A structure determination was completed on form (Ia) at 283 K. Form (Ia) was then supercooled below the phase transition temperature at 279 to 173 K to give form (Ib) for a second structure determination. Metastable form (Ib) was transformed by momentary warming and recooling to give form (II) for a third structure determination at 173 K. Form (II) transformed to form (Ic) upon warming to 283 K. Enantiotropic phase transitions between phases (I) and (II) were confirmed with X‐ray powder diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. Form (Ia) was found as a twin by nonmerohedry by a reflection in (011). This twinning persists in all phases described. Additional twinning was found after the phase (I) to phase (II) transformation. These two additional twin components are related to the first pair by a 180° rotation about the (012) plane. This latter pair of twins persisted as the specimen was warmed back to form (Ic) at 283 K.     

Solvothermal Synthesis and Structural Characterization of an Organic‐Templated New Aluminogermanate with the GIS Topology

A new organic‐templated aluminogermanate [C₄H₁₂N][AlGe₃O₈] ( 1 ) has been prepared under solvothermal conditions by using 2‐propanol as solvent. The structure of the title compound was characterized by IR spectroscopic, elemental analysis, TG, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and powder X‐ray diffraction. Compound 1 crystallizes in the tetragonal space group I4₁/a, a = b = 10.7754(8) Å, c = 9.9116(14) Å, V = 1150.8(2) Å³, Z = 4. The structure of the title compound shows eight‐membered ring channels along a and b axes with a typical GIS topology, and – most importantly – the structure of the inorganic framework is retained when the organic amine is removed by calcination.     

Two polymorphs,with Z′ = 1 and 2, of 2‐amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐morpholino­pyrimidine in P21/c,and 2‐amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐piperidino­pyrimidine,which is isomorphous and almost isostructural with the Z′ = 2 polymorph

Crystallization of 2‐amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐morpholino­pyrimidine, C₈H₁₁ClN₄O, (I), yields two polymorphs, both with space group P2₁/c, having Z′ = 1 (from diethyl ether solution) and Z′ = 2 (from di­chloro­methane solution), denoted (Ia) and (Ib), respectively. In polymorph (Ia), the mol­ecules are linked by an N—H⋯O and an N—H⋯N hydrogen bond into sheets built from alternating R(8) and R(40) rings. In polymorph (Ib), one mol­ecule acts as a triple acceptor of hydrogen bonds and the other acts as a single acceptor; one N—H⋯O and three N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules in a complex chain containing two types of R(8) and one type of R(18) ring. 2‐Amino‐4‐chloro‐6‐piperidino­pyrimidine, C₉H₁₃ClN₄, (II), which is isomorphous with polymorph (Ib), also has Z′ = 2 in P2₁/c, and the mol­ecules are linked by three N—­H⋯N hydrogen bonds into a centrosymmetric four‐mol­ecule aggregate containing three R(8) rings.     

(E)‐(4‐Hydroxyphenyl)(4‐nitrophenyl)diazene, (E)‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)(4‐nitrophenyl)diazene and (E)‐[4‐(6‐bromohexyloxy)phenyl](4‐cyanophenyl)diazene

Syntheses and X‐ray structural investigations have been carried out for (E)‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)(4‐nitro­phenyl)­diazene, C₁₂H₉N₃O₃, (Ia), (E)‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)(4‐nitro­phenyl)­diazene, C₁₃H₁₁N₃O₃, (IIIa), and (E)‐[4‐(6‐bromo­hexyl­oxy)­phenyl](4‐cyano­phenyl)­diazene, C₁₉H₂₀BrN₃O, (IIIc). In all of these compounds, the mol­ecules are almost planar and the azo­benzene core has a trans geometry. Compound (Ia) contains four and compound (IIIc) contains two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, both in space group P (No. 2). In compound (Ia), the independent mol­ecules are almost identical, whereas in crystal (IIIc), the two independent mol­ecules differ significantly due to different conformations of the alkyl tails. In the crystals of (Ia) and (IIIa), the mol­ecules are arranged in almost planar sheets. In the crystal of (IIIc), the mol­ecules are packed with a marked separation of the azo­benzene cores and alkyl tails, which is common for the solid crystalline precursors of mesogens.     

Conformational studies of hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid and orotic acid

Hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid [2‐(2,5‐dioxoimidazolidin‐4‐yl)acetic acid] and orotic acid (2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐4‐carboxylic acid) each contain one rigid acceptor–donor–acceptor hydrogen‐bonding site and a flexible side chain, which can adopt different conformations. Since both compounds may be used as coformers for supramolecular complexes, they have been crystallized in order to examine their conformational preferences, giving solvent‐free hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid, C₅H₆N₂O₄, (I), and three crystals containing orotic acid, namely, orotic acid dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₅H₄N₂O₄·C₂H₆OS, (IIa), dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (1/1), C₂H₈N⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·C₅H₄N₂O₄, (IIb), and dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (3/1), 3C₂H₈N⁺·3C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·C₅H₄N₂O₄, (IIc). The crystal structure of (I) shows a three‐dimensional network, with the acid function located perpendicular to the ring. Interestingly, the hydroxy O atom acts as an acceptor, even though the carbonyl O atom is not involved in any hydrogen bonds. However, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), the acid functions are only slightly twisted out of the ring planes. All H atoms of the acidic functions are directed away from the rings and, with respect to the carbonyl O atoms, they show an antiperiplanar conformation in (I) and synperiplanar conformations in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc). Furthermore, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), different conformations of the acid O=C—C—N torsion angle are observed, leading to different hydrogen‐bonding arrangements depending on their conformation and composition.     

Seven 3‐methylidene‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐ones related to the multiple‐receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib

The solid‐state structures of a series of seven substituted 3‐methylidene‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one derivatives have been determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and are compared in detail. Six of the structures {(3Z)‐3‐(1H‐pyrrol‐2‐ylmethylidene)‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one, C₁₃H₁₀N₂O, (2a); (3Z)‐3‐(2‐thienylmethylidene)‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one, C₁₃H₉NOS, (2b); (3E)‐3‐(2‐furylmethylidene)‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one monohydrate, C₁₃H₉NO₂·H₂O, (3a); 3‐(1‐methylethylidene)‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one, C₁₁H₁₁NO, (4a); 3‐cyclohexylidene‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one, C₁₄H₁₅NO, (4c); and spiro[1,3‐dioxane‐2,3′‐indolin]‐2′‐one, C₁₁H₁₁NO₃, (5)} display, as expected, intermolecular hydrogen bonding (N—H...O=C) between the 1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one units. However, methyl 3‐(1‐methylethylidene)‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐indole‐1‐carboxylate, C₁₃H₁₃NO₃, (4b), a carbamate analogue of (4a) lacking an N—H bond, displays no intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The structure of (4a) contains three molecules in the asymmetric unit, while (4b) and (4c) both contain two independent molecules.     

Preparation and structural analysis of (±)‐cis‐ethyl 2‐sulfanylidenedecahydro‐1,6‐naphthyridine‐6‐carboxylate and (±)‐trans‐ethyl 2‐oxooctahydro‐1H‐pyrrolo[3,2‐c]pyridine‐5‐carboxylate

Bicycle ring closure on a mixture of (4aS,8aR)‐ and (4aR,8aS)‐ethyl 2‐oxodecahydro‐1,6‐naphthyridine‐6‐carboxylate, followed by conversion of the separated cis and trans isomers to the corresponding thioamide derivatives, gave (4aSR,8aRS)‐ethyl 2‐sulfanylidenedecahydro‐1,6‐naphthyridine‐6‐carboxylate, C₁₁H₁₈N₂O₂S. Structural analysis of this thioamide revealed a structure with two crystallographically independent conformers per asymmetric unit (Z′ = 2). The reciprocal bicycle ring closure on (3aRS,7aRS)‐ethyl 2‐oxooctahydro‐1H‐pyrrolo[3,2‐c]pyridine‐5‐carboxylate, C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₃, was also accomplished in good overall yield. Here the five‐membered ring is disordered over two positions, so that both enantiomers are represented in the asymmetric unit. The compounds act as key intermediates towards the synthesis of potential new polycyclic medicinal chemical structures.     

Channel‐forming solvates of 6‐chloro‐2,5‐dihydroxypyridine and its solvent‐free tautomer 6‐chloro‐5‐hydroxy‐2‐pyridone

On crystallization from CHCl₃, CCl₄, CH₂ClCH₂Cl and CHCl₂CHCl₂, 6‐chloro‐5‐hydroxy‐2‐pyridone, C₅H₄ClNO₂, (I), undergoes a tautomeric rearrangement to 6‐chloro‐2,5‐dihydroxypyridine, (II). The resulting crystals, viz. 6‐chloro‐2,5‐dihydroxypyridine chloroform 0.125‐solvate, C₅H₄ClNO₂·0.125CHCl₃, (IIa), 6‐chloro‐2,5‐dihydroxypyridine carbon tetrachloride 0.125‐solvate, C₅H₄ClNO₂.·0.125CCl₄, (IIb), 6‐chloro‐2,5‐dihydroxypyridine 1,2‐dichloroethane solvate, C₅H₄ClNO₂·C₂H₄Cl₂, (IIc), and 6‐chloro‐2,5‐dihydroxypyridine 1,1,2,2‐tetrachloroethane solvate, C₅H₄ClNO₂·C₂H₂Cl₄, (IId), have I4₁/a symmetry, and incorporate extensively disordered solvent in channels that run the length of the c axis. Upon gentle heating to 378 K in vacuo, these crystals sublime to form solvent‐free crystals with P2₁/n symmetry that are exclusively the pyridone tautomer, (I). In these sublimed pyridone crystals, inversion‐related molecules form R²₂(8) dimers via pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The dimers are linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds into R⁴₆(28) motifs, which join to form pleated sheets that stack along the a axis. In the channel‐containing pyridine solvate crystals, viz. (IIa)–(IId), two independent host molecules form an R²₂(8) dimer via a pair of O—H...N hydrogen bonds. One molecule is further linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds to two 4₁ screw‐related equivalents to form a helical motif parallel to the c axis. The other independent molecule is O—H...O hydrogen bonded to two related equivalents to form tetrameric R⁴₄(28) rings. The dimers are π–π stacked with inversion‐related dimers, which in turn stack the R⁴₄(28) rings along c to form continuous solvent‐accessible channels. CHCl₃, CCl₄, CH₂ClCH₂Cl and CHCl₂CHCl₂ solvent molecules are able to occupy these channels but are disordered by virtue of the site symmetry within the channels.     

Monosodium [1‐hydroxy‐2‐(1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐4‐yl)ethane‐1,1‐diyl]bis(phosphonate) tetrahydrate (monosodium isozoledronate)

The title compound, Na⁺·C₅H₉N₂O₇P₂^?·4H₂O, is an isomer of zoledronate, a potent bone antiresorptive bis­phospho­nate drug having significant activity against several parasitic protozoa. The crystal structure of isozoledronate consists of bisphosphonate dimers coordinated by two Na⁺ ions. The dimers are held together through an extensive hydrogen‐bonding network. The crystals exhibit non‐merohedral twinning that roughly superimposes the a and b axes, and inverts the c axis.     

Thermodynamic Phase Transition Through Crystal‐to‐Crystal Process of Photochromic 1,2‐Bis(5‐phenyl‐2‐propyl‐3‐thienyl)perfluorocyclopentene

A photochromic diarylethene, 1,2‐bis(5‐phenyl‐2‐propyl‐3‐thienyl)perfluorocyclopentene ( 1a ), was found to have two polymorphic crystal forms, α‐ and β‐crystals. From X‐ray crystallographic analysis, the space groups of α‐ and β‐crystals were determined to be P2₁/c and C2/c, respectively. The difference between two crystal forms is ascribed to the orientation of two of four molecules in the unit cell. The thermodynamic phase transition from α‐ to β‐forms occurred via a crystal‐to‐crystal process, as confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry measurements, optical microscopic observations in the reflection mode and under crossed Nicols, and powder X‐ray diffraction measurements. The movement of the molecules in the crystal was evaluated by analyzing the change of face indices before and after the phase transition.     

Variationen modulo 4–4+, 4+3–3+4–, 4–5+, 5–4+4–5+4–4+ bei Seltenerdcarbidhalogeniden

The new compounds Pr₈(C₂)₄Cl₅ (1), Pr₁₄(C₂)₇Cl₉ (2), Pr₂₂(C₂)₁₁Cl₁₄ (3), Ce₂(C₂)Cl (4), La₂(C₂)Br (5), Ce₂(C₂)Br (6), Pr₂(C₂)Br (7), Ce₁₈(C₂)₉Cl₁₁ (8), and Ce₂₆(C₂)₁₃Cl₁₆ (9) were prepared by heating mixtures of LnX₃, Ln and carbon or in an alternatively way LnX₃, and “Ln₂C_3–x” in appropriate amounts for several days between 750 and 1200 °C. The crystal structures were investigated by X‐ray powder analysis (5–7) and/or single crystal diffraction (1–4, 8, 9). Pr₈(C₂)₄Cl₅ crystallizes in space group P2₁/c with the lattice parameters a = 7.6169(12), b = 16.689(2), c = 6.7688(2) Å, β = 103.94(1) °, Pr₁₄(C₂)₇Cl₉ in Pc with a = 7.6134(15), b = 29.432(6), c = 6.7705(14) Å, β = 104.00(3) °, Pr₂₂(C₂)₁₁Cl₁₄ in P2₁/c with a = 7.612(2), b = 46.127(9), c = 6.761(1) Å, β = 103.92(3) °, Ce₂(C₂)₂Cl in C2/c with a = 14.573(3), b = 4.129(1), c = 6.696(1) Å, β = 101.37(3) °, La₂(C₂)₂Br in C2/c with a = 15.313(5), b = 4.193(2), c = 6.842(2) Å, β = 100.53(3) °, Ce₂(C₂)₂Br in C2/c with a = 15.120(3), b = 4.179(1), c = 6.743(2) Å, β = 101.09(3) °, Pr₂(C₂)₂Br in C2/c with a = 15.054(5), b = 4.139(1), c = 6.713(3) Å, β = 101.08(3) °, Ce₁₈(C₂)₉Cl₁₁ in P$\bar{1}$ with a = 6.7705(14), b = 7.6573(15), c = 18.980(4) Å,α = 88.90(3) °, β = 80.32(3) °, γ = 76.09(3) °, and Ce₂₆(C₂)₁₃Cl₁₆ in P2₁/c with a = 7.6644(15), b = 54.249(11), c = 6.7956(14) Å, β = 103.98(3) ° The crystal structures are composed of Ln octahedra centered by C₂ dumbbells. Such Ln₆(C₂)‐octahedra are condensed into chains which are joined into undulated sheets. In compounds 1–4 three and four up and down inclined ribbons alternate (4₊4_–, 4₊3_–3₊4_–, 4₊4_–3₊4_–4₊3_–), in compounds 8 and 9 four and five (4₊5_–, 5₊4_–4₊5_–4₊4_–), and in compounds 4–7 one, one ribbons (1₊1_–) are present. The Ln‐(C₂)‐Ln layers are separated by monolayers of X atoms.     

3‐Amino‐1,2,4‐triazine

In the crystal structure of 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazine, C₃H₄N₄, the mol­ecules form hydrogen‐bonded chains that are almost parallel to the b axis (3.2°), and which are inclined to the a and c axes by ～21 and ～69°, respectively. The distortion of the 1,2,4‐triazine ring in the crystal is compared with gas‐phase ab initio molecular‐orbital calculations.     

Polymorphism of 3‐(5‐phenyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl)‐ and 3‐[5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]‐2H‐chromen‐2‐ones

This study of 3‐(5‐phenyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl)‐2H‐chromen‐2‐one, C₁₇H₁₀N₂O₃, 1 , and 3‐[5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]‐2H‐chromen‐2‐one, C₁₆H₉N₃O₃, 2 , was performed on the assumption of the potential anticancer activity of the compounds. Three polymorphic structures for 1 and two polymorphic structures for 2 have been studied thoroughly. The strongest intermolecular interaction is stacking of the `head‐to‐head' type in all the studied crystals. The polymorphic structures of 1 differ with respect to the intermolecular interactions between stacked columns. Two of the polymorphs have a columnar or double columnar type of crystal organization, while the third polymorphic structure can be classified as columnar‐layered. The difference between the two structures of 2 is less pronounced. Both crystals can be considered as having very similar arrangements of neighbouring columns. The formation of polymorphic modifications is caused by a subtle balance of very weak intermolecular interactions and packing differences can be identified only using an analysis based on a study of the pairwise interaction energies.     

Synthesis and crystal structures of some bis(3‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐2‐yl)(salicyl)methanes

Four 2,2′‐bisindolylmethanes (BIMs), a useful class of polyindolyl species joined to a central carbon, were synthesized using salicylaldehyde derivatives and simple acid catalysis; these are 2‐[bis(3‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐6‐methylphenol, (IIa), 2‐[bis(3‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐4,6‐dichlorophenol, (IIb), 2‐[bis(3‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐4‐nitrophenol, (IIc), and 2‐[bis(3‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐4,6‐di‐tert‐butylphenol, (IId). BIMs (IIa) and (IIb) were characterized crystallographically as the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) disolvates, i.e. C₂₆H₂₄N₂O·2C₂H₆OS and C₂₅H₂₀Cl₂N₂O·2C₂H₆OS, respectively. Both form strikingly similar one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding chain motifs with the DMSO solvent molecules. BIM (IIa) packs into double layers of chains whose orientations alternate every double layer, while (IIb) forms more simply packed chains along the a axis. BIM (IIa) has a remarkably long c axis.     

γ‐HIO3 – a Metastable,Centrosymmetric Polymorph of Iodic Acid

From solutions of chromium(III) perchlorate and periodic acid, single crystals of γ‐HIO₃ were obtained and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and thermal analysis. The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system, space group Pbca (a = 563.92, b = 611.10, c = 1507.16 pm). The structure is built up by dimers (HIO₃)₂, which are formed by hydrogen bonds. The crystals are metastable and transform into the stable modification, α‐HIO₃, within a couple of weeks.     

Absolute structures and conformations of the spongian diterpenes spongia‐13(16),14‐dien‐3‐one,epispongiadiol and spongiadiol

The absolute configurations of spongia‐13(16),14‐dien‐3‐one [systematic name: (3bR,5aR,9aR,9bR)‐3b,6,6,9a‐tetramethyl‐4,5,5a,6,8,9,9a,9b,10,11‐decahydrophenanthro[1,2‐c]furan‐7(3bH)‐one], C₂₀H₂₈O₂, (I), epispongiadiol [systematic name: (3bR,5aR,6S,7R,9aR,9bR)‐7‐hydroxy‐6‐hydroxymethyl‐3b,6,9a‐trimethyl‐3b,5,5a,6,7,9,9a,9b,10,11‐decahydrophenanthro[1,2‐c]furan‐8(4H)‐one], C₂₀H₂₈O₄, (II), and spongiadiol [systematic name: (3bR,5aR,6S,7S,9aR,9bR)‐7‐hydroxy‐6‐hydroxymethyl‐3b,6,9a‐trimethyl‐3b,5,5a,6,7,9,9a,9b,10,11‐decahydrophenanthro[1,2‐c]furan‐8(4H)‐one], C₂₀H₂₈O₄, (III), were assigned by analysis of anomalous dispersion data collected at 130 K with Cu Kα radiation. Compounds (II) and (III) are epimers. The equatorial 3‐hydroxyl group on the cyclohexanone ring (A) of (II) is syn with respect to the 4‐hydroxymethyl group, leading to a chair conformation. In contrast, isomer (III), where the 3‐hydroxyl group is anti to the 4‐hydroxymethyl group, is conformationally disordered between a major chair conformer where the OH group is axial and a minor boat conformer where it is equatorial. In compound (I), a carbonyl group is present at position 3 and ring A adopts a distorted‐boat conformation.     

Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von (2‐Methylpyridinium)3[TbCl6] und (2‐Methylpyridinium)2[TbCl5(1‐Butanol)]

Preparation and Structure of (2‐Methylpyridinium)₃[TbCl₆] and (2‐Methylpyridinium)₂[TbCl₅(1‐Butanol)] The complex chlorides (2‐Methylpyridinium)₃[TbCl₆] (1) and (2‐Methylpyridinium)₂[TbCl₅(1‐Butanol)] (2) have been prepared for the first time. The crystal structures have been determinated from single crystal X‐ray diffraction data. 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (Z = 8) with a = 3241,2(5) pm, b = 897,41(9) pm, c = 1774,2(2) pm and β = 97,83(2)°, 2 in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (Z = 4) with a = 1372,96(16) pm, b = 997,57(9) pm, c = 1820,5(2) pm and β = 108,75(1)°. The structures contain isolated octahedral building units [TbCl₆]^3– and [TbCl₅(1‐Butanol)]^2–, respectively.