Hydrogen‐bonded structures of the isomeric compounds of quinoline with 2‐chloro‐5‐nitrobenzoic acid, 3‐chloro‐2‐nitrobenzoic acid, 4‐chloro‐2‐nitrobenzoic acid and 5‐chloro‐2‐nitrobenzoic acid

The structures of four isomeric compounds, all C₇H₄ClNO₄·C₉H₇N, of quinoline with chloro‐ and nitro‐substituted benzoic acid, namely, 2‐chloro‐5‐nitrobenzoic acid–quinoline (1/1), (I), 3‐chloro‐2‐nitrobenzoic acid–quinoline (1/1), (II), 4‐chloro‐2‐nitrobenzoic acid–quinoline (1/1), (III), and 5‐chloro‐2‐nitrobenzoic acid–quinoline (1/1), (IV), have been determined at 185 K. In each compound, a short hydrogen bond is observed between the pyridine N atom and a carboxyl O atom. The N...O distances are 2.6476 (13), 2.5610 (13), 2.5569 (12) and 2.5429 (12) Å for (I), (II), (III) and (IV), respectively. Although in (I) the H atom in the hydrogen bond is located at the O site, in (II), (III) and (IV) the H atom is disordered in the hydrogen bond over two positions with (N site):(O site) occupancies of 0.39 (3):0.61 (3), 0.47 (3):0.53 (3) and 0.65 (3):0.35 (3), respectively.     

Hydrogen‐bonded structures of the isomeric 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilates

In the three isomeric salts, all C₆H₇N₂O⁺·C₆HCl₂O₄⁻, of chloranilic acid (2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone) with 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐carbamoylpyridine, namely, 2‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate (systematic name: 2‐carbamoylpyridinium 2,5‐dichloro‐4‐hydroxy‐3,6‐dioxocyclohexa‐1,4‐dienolate), (I), 3‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate, (II), and 4‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate, (III), acid–base interactions involving H‐atom transfer are observed. The shortest interactions between the cation and the anion in (I) and (II) are pyridinium N—H...(O,O) bifurcated hydrogen bonds, which act as the primary intermolecular interaction in each crystal structure. In (III), an amide N—H...(O,O) bifurcated hydrogen bond, which is much weaker than the bifurcated hydrogen bonds in (I) and (II), connects the cation and the anion.     

Hydrogen‐bonded two‐ and three‐dimensional polymeric structures in the ammonium salts of 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid, 4‐nitrobenzoic acid and 2,4‐dichlorobenzoic acid

The structures of ammonium 3,5‐dinitrobenzoate, NH₄⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆⁻, (I), ammonium 4‐nitrobenzoate dihydrate, NH₄⁺·C₇H₄NO₄⁻·2H₂O, (II), and ammonium 2,4‐dichlorobenzoate hemihydrate, NH₄⁺·C₇H₃Cl₂O₂⁻·0.5H₂O, (III), have been determined and their hydrogen‐bonded structures are described. All three salts form hydrogen‐bonded polymeric structures, viz. three‐dimensional in (I) and two‐dimensional in (II) and (III). With (I), a primary cation–anion cyclic association is formed [graph set R₄³(10)] through N—H...O hydrogen bonds, involving a carboxylate group with both O atoms contributing to the hydrogen bonds (denoted O,O′‐carboxylate) on one side and a carboxylate group with one O atom involved in two hydrogen bonds (denoted O‐carboxylate) on the other. Structure extension involves N—H...O hydrogen bonds to both carboxylate and nitro O‐atom acceptors. With structure (II), the primary inter‐species interactions and structure extension into layers lying parallel to (001) are through conjoined cyclic hydrogen‐bonding motifs, viz.R₄³(10) (one cation, an O,O′‐carboxylate group and two water molecules) and centrosymmetric R₄²(8) (two cations and two water molecules). The structure of (III) also has conjoined R₄³(10) and centrosymmetric R₄²(8) motifs in the layered structure but these differ in that the first motif involves one cation, an O,O′‐carboxylate group, an O‐carboxylate group and one water molecule, and the second motif involves two cations and two O‐carboxylate groups. The layers lie parallel to (100). The structures of salt hydrates (II) and (III), displaying two‐dimensional layered arrays through conjoined hydrogen‐bonded nets, provide further illustration of a previously indicated trend among ammonium salts of carboxylic acids, but the anhydrous three‐dimensional structure of (I) is inconsistent with that trend.     

Hydrogen‐bonded structures of the 1:1 and 1:2 compounds of chloranilic acid with pyrrolidin‐2‐one and piperidin‐2‐one

In the four compounds of chloranilic acid (2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxycyclohexa‐2,5‐diene‐1,4‐dione) with pyrrolidin‐2‐one and piperidin‐2‐one, namely, chloranilic acid–pyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·C₄H₇NO, (I), chloranilic acid–pyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/2), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·2C₄H₇NO, (II), chloranilic acid–piperidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·C₅H₉NO, (III), and chloranilic acid–piperidin‐2‐one (1/2), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·2C₅H₉NO, (IV), the shortest interactions between the two components are O—H...O hydrogen bonds, which act as the primary intermolecular interaction in the crystal structures. In (II), (III) and (IV), the chloranilic acid molecules lie about inversion centres. For (III), this necessitates the presence of two independent acid molecules. In (I), there are two formula units in the asymmetric unit. The O...O distances are 2.4728 (11) and 2.4978 (11) Å in (I), 2.5845 (11) Å in (II), 2.6223 (11) and 2.5909 (10) Å in (III), and 2.4484 (10) Å in (IV). In the hydrogen bond of (IV), the H atom is disordered over two positions with site occupancies of 0.44 (3) and 0.56 (3). This indicates that proton transfer between the acid and base has partly taken place to form ion pairs. In (I) and (II), N—H...O hydrogen bonds, the secondary intermolecular interactions, connect the pyrrolidin‐2‐one molecules into a dimer, while in (III) and (IV) these hydrogen bonds link the acid and base to afford three‐ and two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded networks, respectively.     

2:1 Complexes of 2‐chloro‐4‐nitro­benzoic acid and 2‐chloro‐5‐nitro­benzoic acid with pyrazine

2‐Chloro‐4‐nitro­benzoic acid and 2‐chloro‐5‐nitro­benzoic acid form O—H?N hydrogen bonds with pyrazine to afford 2:1 complexes of 2C₇H₄ClNO₄·C₄H₄N₂, (I) and (II), respectively, that are located on inversion centers. The 2C₇H₄ClNO₄·­C₄H₄N₂ units in both complexes are connected by weak C—H?O hydrogen bonds; the units build a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network in (I) and a ribbon structure in (II).     

Hydrogen‐bonded 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene and maleic acid

The title compound (systematic name: 4,4′‐ethyl­ene­dipyridinium dimaleate), C₁₂H₁₂N₂²⁺·2C₄H₃O₄^?, is a 1:2 adduct of 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethyl­ene (BPE) and maleic acid (MA). The interaction between the two components in the molecular complex is due to intermolecular hydrogen bonding via an N⁺—H?O^? hydrogen bond.     

Supramolecular structures of 2‐chloro‐5‐methyl­phenol and 4‐chloro‐3‐methyl­phenol (chlorocresol)

The crystal structures of the title compounds (both C₇H₇ClO) are characterized by two independent mol­ecules in each of the asymmetric units and feature O—H...O, C—H...π and π–π interactions. In addition, intermolecular C—H...Cl and intramolecular O—H...Cl interactions are present in 2‐chloro‐5‐methyl­phenol. For each crystal, the non‐covalent interactions emphasize the different spatial environments for the two independent mol­ecules.     

Hydrogen‐bonded molecular ladders in S‐(4‐nitrophenyl)thioglycolic acid

Molecules of the title compound, [(4‐nitro­phenyl)­sulfanyl]­acetic acid, C₈H₇NO₄S, are linked by paired O—H?O hydrogen bonds [H?O 1.81 Å, O?O 2.6456 (15) Å and O—H?O 178°] into centrosymmetric dimers containing an R(8) motif. A single C—H?O hydrogen bond having a nitro O atom as acceptor [H?O 2.47 Å, 3.3018 (19) Å and C—H?O 147°] links the dimers into a molecular ladder, and neighbouring ladders are weakly linked into sheets by aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions.     

2‐Chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoic acid as a coformer with pharmaceutical cocrystals and molecular salts

A series of five binary complexes, i.e. three cocrystals and two molecular salts, using 2‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoic acid as a coformer have been produced with five commonly available compounds, some of pharmaceutical relevance, namely, 2‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoic acid–isonicotinamide (1/1), C₇H₄ClNO₄·C₆H₆N₂O, 2‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoic acid–3,3‐diethylpyridine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione (2/1), 2C₇H₄ClNO₄·C₉H₁₃NO₂, 2‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoic acid–pyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₇H₄ClNO₄·C₄H₇NO, 2‐carboxypiperidinium 2‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoate, C₆H₁₂NO₂^?·C₇H₃ClNO₄^?, and (2‐hydroxyethyl)ammonium 2‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzoate, C₂H₈NO⁺·C₇H₃ClNO₄^?. The coformer falls under the classification of a `generally regarded as safe' compound. All five complexes make use of a number of different heteromeric hydrogen‐bonded interactions. Intermolecular potentials were evaluated using the CSD‐Materials module.     

Hydrogen‐bonded layers in the 1:2 cocrystal of 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid with isonicotinohydrazide

Cocrystallization of 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid with isonicotinohydrazide from methanol solution yields the 1:2 cocrystal 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid–isonicotinohydrazide (1/2), C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂·2C₆H₇N₃O. The component molecules are linked by intermolecular O—H...N, N—H...O, N—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds into layers running parallel to the (010) plane, and these layers are further linked into a three‐dimensional framework structure by means of weak aromatic π–π stacking interactions. As a potential cocrystallization agent, isonicotinohydrazide may be used for effective and versatile synthetic supramolecular strategies utilizing hydrogen bonding of specific molecular building blocks.     

Hydrogen‐bonded network in biphenyl‐4,4′‐diphosphonic acid

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₂H₁₂O₆P₂, displays two different regions alternating along the a axis: a hydrogen‐bonded region encompassing the end‐positioned phosphonic acid groups and a hydrophobic region formed by the aromatic spacers. The asymmetric unit contains only half of the biphenyl‐4,4′‐diphosphonic acid (4,4′‐bpdp) molecule, which is symmetric with an inversion centre imposed at the mid‐point between the two aromatic rings. The periodic organization of the molecules is controlled by two strong O—H...O interactions between the phosphonic acid sites. Weak C—H...π interactions are established in the aromatic regions.     

Hydrogen‐bonded sheet structures in neutral,anionic and hydrated 6‐amino‐2‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐5‐nitrosopyrimidines

In each of 6‐amino‐3‐methyl‐2‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐5‐nitrosopyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one, C₉H₁₃N₅O₃, (I), morpholin‐4‐ium 4‐amino‐2‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐5‐nitroso‐6‐oxo‐1,6‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ide, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₈H₁₀N₅O₃⁻, (II), and 6‐amino‐2‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐5‐nitrosopyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one hemihydrate, C₈H₁₁N₅O₃·0.5H₂O, (III), the bond distances within the pyrimidine components are consistent with significant electronic polarization, which is most marked in (II) and least marked in (I). Despite the high level of substitution, the pyrimidine rings are all effectively planar, and in each of the pyrimidine components, there are intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds. In each compound, the organic components are linked by multiple N—H...O hydrogen bonds to form sheets of widely differing construction, and in compound (III) adjacent sheets are linked by the water molecules, so forming a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded framework. This study also contains the first direct geometric comparison between the electronic polarization in a neutral aminonitrosopyrimidine and that in its ring‐deprotonated conjugate anion in a metal‐free environment.     

Two isomeric 2‐[4‐chloro‐2‐fluoro‐5‐(prop‐2‐ynyloxy)phenyl]hexahydro­isoindole‐1,3‐dione compounds

The molecular structures of 2‐[4‐chloro‐2‐fluoro‐5‐(prop‐2‐ynyloxy)phenyl]‐1,3,4,5,6,7‐hexahydro­isoindole‐1,3‐dione, C₁₇H₁₃ClFNO₃, (I), and the isomeric compound 2‐[4‐chloro‐2‐fluoro‐5‐(prop‐2‐ynyloxy)phenyl]‐cis‐1,3,3a,4,7,7a‐hexahydro­isoindole‐1,3‐dione, (II), are, as anticipated, significantly different in their conformations and in the distances between the farthest two atoms. The six‐membered ring of the 1,3,4,5,6,7‐hexahydro­isoindole‐1,3‐dione moiety in (I) adopts a half‐chair conformation. The dihedral angle between the five‐membered dione ring of (I) and the benzene ring is 50.96 (7)°. The six‐membered ring of the cis‐1,3,3a,4,7,7a‐hexahydro­isoindole‐1,3‐dione moiety in (II) adopts a boat conformation. The dihedral angle in (II) between the five‐membered dione ring and the benzene ring is 61.03 (13)°. In the crystal structures, the molecules are linked by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak π–π interactions. Compound (I) is a much more potent herbicide than (II). The Cl⋯H distances between the farthest two atoms in (I) and (II) are 11.37 and 9.97 Å, respectively.     

Two‐ and three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the isomeric monoaminobenzoic acids

The crystal structures of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the three isomeric monoaminobenzoic acids, namely the hydrate 2‐carboxyanilinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate dihydrate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻·2H₂O, (I), and the anhydrous salts 3‐carboxyanilinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), and 4‐carboxyanilinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (III), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) has a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheet structure, while (II) and (III) are three‐dimensional. All three compounds feature sheet substructures formed through anilinium N⁺—H...O_carboxyl and anion carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl interactions and, in the case of (I), additionally linked through the donor and acceptor associations of the solvent water molecules. However, (II) and (III) have additional lateral extensions of these substructures though cyclic R²₂(8) associations involving the carboxylic acid groups of the cations. Also, (II) and (III) have cation–anion π–π aromatic ring interactions. This work provides further examples illustrating the regular formation of network substructures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer salts of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the bifunctional aromatic amines.     

Hydrogen‐bonded assemblies of 5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(4‐hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin with dimethylformamide,dimethylacetamide and water

The title free base porphyrin compound forms hydrogen‐bonded adducts with N,N‐dimethylformamide, C₄₄H₃₀N₄O₄·4C₃H₇NO, (I), a mixture of N,N‐dimethylformamide and water, C₄₄H₃₀N₄O₄·4C₃H₇NO·H₂O, (II), and a mixture of N,N‐dimethylacetamide and water, C₄₄H₃₀N₄O₄·6C₃H₇NO·2H₂O, (III). Total solvation of the four hydroxy functions of the porphyrin molecules characterizes all three compounds, thus preventing its supramolecular association into extended network architectures. In (I), the asymmetric unit consist of two five‐component adduct species, while in (III), the nine‐component entities reside on centres of inversion. This report provides the first structural characterizations of the free base tetra(hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin. It also demonstrates that the presence of strong Lewis bases, such as dimethylformamide or dimethylacetamide, in the crystallization mixture prevents direct supramolecular networking of the porphyrin ligands via O—H...O—H hydrogen bonds, due to their competing O—H...N(base) interaction with the hydroxy functions. The crystal packing of compounds (I)–(III) resembles that of other hydrogen‐bonding‐assisted tetraarylporphyrin clathrates.     

Hydrogen‐bonded sheet structures in methyl 4‐(4‐chloroanilino)‐3‐nitrobenzoate and methyl 1‐benzyl‐2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole‐5‐carboxylate

In methyl 4‐(4‐chloroanilino)‐3‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₄H₁₁ClN₂O₄, (I), there is an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond and the intramolecular distances provide evidence for electronic polarization of the o‐quinonoid type. The molecules are linked into sheets built from N—H...O, C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds, together with an aromatic π–π stacking interaction. The molecules of methyl 1‐benzyl‐2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole‐5‐carboxylate, C₂₂H₁₇ClN₂O₂, (II), are also linked into sheets, this time by a combination of C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π stacking interactions.     

Theoretical calculations on the mechanisms of the gas‐phase elimination kinetics of 2‐chloro‐1‐phenylethane, 3‐chloro‐1‐phenylpropane, 4‐chloro‐1‐phenylbutane, 5‐chloro‐1‐phenylpentane,and their corresponding chloroalkanes: The effect of the phenyl ring

The kinetics and mechanisms of the dehydrochlorination of 2‐chloro‐1‐ phenylethane, 3‐chloro‐1‐phenylpropane, 4‐chloro‐1‐phenylbutane, 5‐chloro‐1‐phenylpentane, and their corresponding chloroalkanes were examined by means of electronic structure calculation using density functional theory methods B3LYP/6–31G(d,p), B3LYP/6–31++G(d,p), MPW1PW91/6–31G(d,p), MPW1PW91/6–31++G(d,p), PBEPBE/6–31G(d,p), and PBEPBE/6–31++G(d,p). The potential energy surface was investigated for the minimum energy path. Calculated enthalpies and energies of activation are in good agreement with experimental values using the MPW1PW91 and B3LYP methods. The transition state of these reactions is a four‐centered cyclic structure. The reported experimental results proposing neighboring group participation by the phenyl group was not supported by theoretical calculations. The rate‐determining process in these reactions is the breaking of Cl? C bond. The reactions are described as concerted moderately polar and nonsynchronous. © 2011 Wiley Peiodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 43: 292–302, 2011     

Experimental and theoretical IR,Raman, NMR spectra of 2‐, 3‐, and 4‐nitrobenzoic acids

The influence of the position of nitro group toward the carboxylic group on the vibration structure of the molecule was estimated. Optimized geometrical structures were calculated (HF, B3PW91, B3LYP). Experimental and theoretical FT‐IR, FT‐Raman, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the title compounds were recorded and analyzed. The most important vibrational bands of nitro and carboxyl groups and the benzene ring were assigned. Wavenumbers and intensities for the three acids studied were compared and discussed. Data of chemical shifts in ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra of 2‐, 3‐, and 4‐nitrobenzoic acids were analyzed in comparison with benzoic acid molecule. The calculated parameters are compared with experimental characteristics of these molecules. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2007     

Quantum mechanical studies of isomeric and conformeric structures of methyl‐chloro‐peroxide

Ab initio quantum mechanical studies are carried out for the isomeric structures and the torsional potential of methyl‐chloro‐peroxide. These species are important intermediates in the atmospheric reactions of methyl, methoxy, and methylperoxy radicals with chlorine dioxide, chlorine monoxide, and atomic chlorine, respectively. The calculations indicate that the peroxide form, CH₃OOCl, with a skew geometry for C, O, O, and Cl atoms, is the lowest minimum energy structure followed by CH₃OClO. The CH₃ClO₂ adduct is found to be much higher in energy. The calculated isomerization barriers are found to be relatively high to permit possible interconversion pathways. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004