Two‐dimensional networks in 2‐methylanilinium picrate and 2,5‐dichloroanilinium picrate

Both the title molecular adducts of 2‐methylaniline or 2,5‐dichloroaniline with picric acid are 1:1 organic salts, namely 2‐methylanilinium picrate, C₇H₁₀N⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻, (I), and 2,5‐dichloroanilinium picrate, C₆H₆Cl₂N⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻, (II). In both structures, the phenoxide O atoms accept two N—H hydrogen bonds in a bifurcated acceptor fashion, which link the component ions by N—H...O hydrogen bonds into continuous two‐dimensional zigzag layers, running parallel to the (100) plane in (I) and the (010) plane in (II). A π–π interaction is observed between symmetry‐related anilinium cations in (I), while in (II), Cl...O_nitro and Cl...Cl interactions are observed. This study indicates that a substitution on aniline can exert a pivotal influence on the construction of its supramolecular structure.     

2,4‐Di­methoxy­benzoic acid and 2,5‐di­methoxy­benzoic acid

The title compounds (both C₉H₁₀O₄) have nearly planar structures, and the methyl and/or carboxylic acid groups lie out of the molecular plane, as dictated by steric interactions. 2,5‐Di­methoxy­benzoic acid (2,5‐DMBA) forms an unusual intramolecular hydrogen bond between the carboxylic acid group and the O atom of the methoxy group in the 2‐position [O⋯O = 2.547 (2) Å and O—H⋯O = 154 (3)°]. 2,4‐DMBA forms a typical hydrogen‐bond dimer with a neighboring mol­ecule.     

Hydrogen‐bonded structures of the 1:1 and 1:2 compounds of chloranilic acid with pyrrolidin‐2‐one and piperidin‐2‐one

In the four compounds of chloranilic acid (2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxycyclohexa‐2,5‐diene‐1,4‐dione) with pyrrolidin‐2‐one and piperidin‐2‐one, namely, chloranilic acid–pyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·C₄H₇NO, (I), chloranilic acid–pyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/2), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·2C₄H₇NO, (II), chloranilic acid–piperidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·C₅H₉NO, (III), and chloranilic acid–piperidin‐2‐one (1/2), C₆H₂Cl₂O₄·2C₅H₉NO, (IV), the shortest interactions between the two components are O—H...O hydrogen bonds, which act as the primary intermolecular interaction in the crystal structures. In (II), (III) and (IV), the chloranilic acid molecules lie about inversion centres. For (III), this necessitates the presence of two independent acid molecules. In (I), there are two formula units in the asymmetric unit. The O...O distances are 2.4728 (11) and 2.4978 (11) Å in (I), 2.5845 (11) Å in (II), 2.6223 (11) and 2.5909 (10) Å in (III), and 2.4484 (10) Å in (IV). In the hydrogen bond of (IV), the H atom is disordered over two positions with site occupancies of 0.44 (3) and 0.56 (3). This indicates that proton transfer between the acid and base has partly taken place to form ion pairs. In (I) and (II), N—H...O hydrogen bonds, the secondary intermolecular interactions, connect the pyrrolidin‐2‐one molecules into a dimer, while in (III) and (IV) these hydrogen bonds link the acid and base to afford three‐ and two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded networks, respectively.     

Magnesium and nickel(II) furan‐2,5‐dicarboxylate

The salts hexaaquamagnesium furan‐2,5‐dicarboxylate, [Mg(H₂O)₆](C₆H₂O₅), (I), and hexaaquanickel furan‐2,5‐dicarboxylate, [Ni(H₂O)₆](C₆H₂O₅), (II), provide the first crystallographic characterization of the furan‐2,5‐dicarboxylate dianion. Both structures exhibit extensive three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding networks between the octahedral coordinated hexaaquametal(II) ions and the dicarboxylate anions. Although the two structures are not isomorphous, they contain essentially identical two‐dimensional slabs. The distinction between the structures is that these slabs are related by translation in (II), whereas adjacent slabs in (I) are reflected relative to each other by the action of a glide plane. The reflection occurs so that the local contacts between slabs are not changed, and thus the hydrogen‐bond networks are identical except for the orientation of the water molecules at the interface between slabs.     

Two furan‐2,5‐dicarboxylic acid solvates crystallized from dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulfoxide

Furan‐2,5‐dicarboxylic acid (FDCA) has been ranked among the top 12 bio‐based building‐block chemicals by the Department of Energy in the US. The molecule was first synthesized in 1876, but large‐scale production has only become possible since the development of modern bio‐ and chemical catalysis techniques. The structures of two FDCA solvates, namely, FDCA dimethylformamide (DMF) disolvate, C₆H₄O₅·2C₃H₇NO, (I), and FDCA dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) monosolvate, C₆H₄O₅·C₂H₆OS, (II), are reported. Solvate (I) crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pbcn space group and solvate (II) crystallizes in the monoclinic P space group. In (I), hydrogen bonds form between the carbonyl O atom in DMF and a hydroxy H atom in FDCA. Whilst in (II), the O atom in one DMSO molecule hydrogen bonds with hydroxy H atoms in two FDCA molecules. Combined with intermolecular S…O interactions, FDCA molecules form a two‐dimensional network coordinated by DMSO.     

Three 2,5‐dialkoxy‐1,4‐diethynylbenzene derivatives

2,5‐Diethoxy‐1,4‐bis[(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]benzene, C₂₀H₃₀O₂Si₂, (I), constitutes one of the first structurally characterized examples of a family of compounds, viz. the 2,5‐dialkoxy‐1,4‐bis[(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]benzene derivatives, used in the preparation of oligo(phenyleneethynylene)s via Pd/Cu‐catalysed cross‐coupling. 2,5‐Diethoxy‐1,4‐diethynylbenzene, C₁₄H₁₄O₂, (II), results from protodesilylation of (I). 1,4‐Diethynyl‐2,5‐bis(heptyloxy)benzene, C₂₄H₃₄O₂, (III), is a long alkyloxy chain analogue of (II). The molecules of compounds (I)–(III) are located on sites with crystallographic inversion symmetry. The large substituents either in the alkynyl group or in the benzene ring have a marked effect on the packing and intermolecular interactions of adjacent molecules. All the compounds exhibit weak intermolecular interactions that are only slightly shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of the interacting atoms. Compound (I) displays C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms and the acetylenic C atom. Compound (II) shows π–π interactions between the acetylenic C atoms, complemented by C—H...π interactions between the methyl H atoms and the acetylenic C atoms. Unlike (I) or (II), compound (III) has weak nonclassical hydrogen‐bond‐type interactions between the acetylenic H atoms and the ether O atoms.     

Metal‐directed supramolecular architectures based on the bifunctional ligand 2,5‐bis(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)terephthalic acid

By the solvothermal reactions of 2,5‐bis(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)terephthalic acid (H₂L) with transition‐metal ions, two novel polymeric complexes, namely, poly[diaqua[μ₄‐2,5‐bis(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)terephthalato]cobalt(II)], [Co(C₁₂H₆N₆O₄)(H₂O)₂]_n, ( 1 ), and poly[[diaqua[μ₄‐2,5‐bis(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)terephthalato]nickel(II)] dihydrate], {[Ni(C₁₂H₆N₆O₄)(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O}_n, ( 2 ), were isolated. Both polymers have been characterized by FT–IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The complexes have similar two‐dimensional layered structures and coordination modes. Furthermore, the two‐dimensional layered structures bear distinct intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions and π–π stacking interactions to form two different three‐dimensional supramolecular networks based on 4⁴‐subnets. The structural variation depends on the nature of the metal cations. The results of variable‐temperature magnetization measurements (χ_MT?T and χ_M^?1?T) show that complexes ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) display antiferromagnetic behaviour.     

Comparison of the hydrogen‐bond patterns in 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1) and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1)

The X‐ray single‐crystal structure determinations of the chemically related compounds 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, C₂H₄N₃S⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, (I), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), C₂H₃N₃S·2C₄H₆O₄, (II), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₅H₈O₄, (III), and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₆H₁₀O₄, (IV), are reported and their hydrogen‐bonding patterns are compared. The hydrogen bonds are of the types N—H...O or O—H...N and are of moderate strength. In some cases, weak C—H...O interactions are also present. Compound (II) differs from the others not only in the molar ratio of base and acid (1:2), but also in its hydrogen‐bonding pattern, which is based on chain motifs. In (I), (III) and (IV), the most prominent feature is the presence of an R₂²(8) graph‐set motif formed by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, which are present in all structures except for (I), where only a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds is present, in agreement with the greater acidity of oxalic acid. There are nonbonding S...O interactions present in all four structures. The difference electron‐density maps show a lack of electron density about the S atom along the S...O vector. In all four structures, the carboxylic acid H atoms are present in a rare configuration with a C—C—O—H torsion angle of ∼0°. In the structures of (II)–(IV), the C—C—O—H torsion angle of the second carboxylic acid group has the more common value of ∼|180|°. The dicarboxylic acid molecules are situated on crystallographic inversion centres in (II). The Raman and IR spectra of the title compounds are presented and analysed.     

Two succinic acid derivatives of 2‐ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol

Crystals of bis(2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium) succinate–succinic acid (1/1), C₈H₁₂NO⁺·0.5C₄H₄O₄²⁻·0.5C₄H₆O₄, (I), and 2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium hydrogen succinate, C₈H₁₂NO⁺·C₄H₅O₄⁻, (II), were obtained by reaction of 2‐ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol with succinic acid. The succinate anion and succinic acid molecule in (I) are located about centres of inversion. Intermolecular O—H...O, N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the formation of a three‐dimensional network in the crystal structure of (I) and a two‐dimensional network in the crystal structure of (II). Both structures are additionally stabilized by π–π interactions between symmetry‐related pyridine rings, forming a rod‐like cationic arrangement for (I) and cationic dimers for (II).     

4‐Ethynyl‐4‐hydroxycyclohexan‐1‐one and 4‐ethynyl‐4‐hydroxy‐2,3,5,6‐tetramethylcyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one

The title compounds, C₈H₁₀O₂, (I), and C₁₂H₁₄O₂, (II), occurred as by‐products in the controlled synthesis of a series of bis­(gem‐alkynols), prepared as part of an extensive study of synthon formation in simple gem‐alkynol derivatives. The two 4‐(gem‐alkynol)‐1‐ones crystallize in space group P2₁/c, (I) with Z′ = 1 and (II) with Z′ = 2. Both structures are dominated by O—H?O=C hydrogen bonds, which form simple chains in the cyclo­hexane derivative, (I), and centrosymmetric dimers, of both symmetry‐independent mol­ecules, in the cyclo­hexa‐2,5‐diene, (II). These strong synthons are further stabilized by C[triple‐bond]C—H?O=C, C_methylene—H?O(H) and C_methyl—H?O(H) interactions. The direct intermolecular interactions between donors and acceptors in the gem‐alkynol group, which characterize the bis­(gem‐alkynol) analogues of (I) and (II), are not present in the ketone derivatives studied here.     

Hydrogen‐bonded structures of the isomeric 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilates

In the three isomeric salts, all C₆H₇N₂O⁺·C₆HCl₂O₄⁻, of chloranilic acid (2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone) with 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐carbamoylpyridine, namely, 2‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate (systematic name: 2‐carbamoylpyridinium 2,5‐dichloro‐4‐hydroxy‐3,6‐dioxocyclohexa‐1,4‐dienolate), (I), 3‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate, (II), and 4‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate, (III), acid–base interactions involving H‐atom transfer are observed. The shortest interactions between the cation and the anion in (I) and (II) are pyridinium N—H...(O,O) bifurcated hydrogen bonds, which act as the primary intermolecular interaction in each crystal structure. In (III), an amide N—H...(O,O) bifurcated hydrogen bond, which is much weaker than the bifurcated hydrogen bonds in (I) and (II), connects the cation and the anion.     

One‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with 8‐hydroxyquinoline, 8‐aminoquinoline and quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid (quinaldic acid)

The structures of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with 8‐hydroxyquinoline, 8‐aminoquinoline and quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid (quinaldic acid), namely anhydrous 8‐hydroxyquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₉H₈NO⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (I), 8‐aminoquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₉H₉N₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), and the adduct hydrate 2‐carboxyquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate quinolinium‐2‐carboxylate monohydrate, C₁₀H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻·C₁₀H₇NO₂·H₂O, (III), have been determined at 130 K. Compounds (I) and (II) are isomorphous and all three compounds have one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain structures, formed in (I) through O—H...O_carboxyl extensions and in (II) through N⁺—H...O_carboxyl extensions of cation–anion pairs. In (III), a hydrogen‐bonded cyclic R₂²(10) pseudo‐dimer unit comprising a protonated quinaldic acid cation and a zwitterionic quinaldic acid adduct molecule is found and is propagated through carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl and water O—H...O_carboxyl interactions. In both (I) and (II), there are also cation–anion aromatic ring π–π associations. This work further illustrates the utility of both hydrogen phthalate anions and interactive‐group‐substituted quinoline cations in the formation of low‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures.     

4‐(2‐Hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine and the 2‐(2,3‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐, 2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐ and 2‐(2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐substituted derivatives

The 1,5‐benzodiazepine ring system exhibits a puckered boat‐like conformation for all four title compounds [4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₁H₁₈N₂O, (I), 2‐(2,3‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₃H₂₂N₂O₃, (II), 2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₃H₂₂N₂O₃, (III), and 2‐(2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₃H₂₂N₂O₃, (IV)]. The stereochemical correlation of the two C₆ aromatic groups with respect to the benzodiazepine ring system is pseudo‐equatorial–equatorial for compounds (I) (the phenyl group), (II) (the 2,3‐dimethoxyphenyl group) and (III) (the 3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl group), while for (IV) (the 2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl group) the system is pseudo‐axial–equatorial. An intramolecular hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl OH group and a benzodiazepine N atom is present for all four compounds and defines a six‐membered ring, whose geometry is constant across the series. Although the molecular structures are similar, the supramolecular packing is different; compounds (I) and (IV) form chains, while (II) forms dimeric units and (III) displays a layered structure. The packing seems to depend on at least two factors: (i) the nature of the atoms defining the hydrogen bond and (ii) the number of intermolecular interactions of the types O—H...O, N—H...O, N—H...π(arene) or C—H...π(arene).     

Hydrogen bonding in 1,2‐diazine–chloranilic acid (2/1) and 1,4‐diazine–chloranilic acid (2/1) determined at 110 K

The crystal structures of the isomeric title compounds [systematic names: pyridazine–2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐p‐benzoquinone (2/1), (I), and pyrazine–2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐p‐benzoquinone (2/1), (II)], 2C₄H₄N₂·C₆H₂Cl₂O₄, have been redetermined at 110 K. The H atom in the intermolecular O...H...N hydrogen bond in each compound was revealed to be disordered; the relative occupancies at the O and N sites are 0.33 (3) and 0.67 (3), respectively, for (I), and 0.56 (4) and 0.44 (4) for (II). The formal charges of the chloranilic acid in (I) and (II) estimated from the occupancy factors are ca−1.3 and −0.8, respectively. The geometries of the centrosymmetric chloranilic acid molecule in (I) and (II) are compared with the neutral, monoanionic and dianionic forms of chloranilic acid optimized by density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6–311+G(3df,2p) level. The result implies that the chloranilic acid molecule in (I) is close to the monoanionic state, while that in (II) is between neutral and monoanionic, consistent with the result derived from the H‐atom occupancies.     

Hydrogen‐bonded assemblies of 20‐(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin‐54,104,154‐tribenzoic acid with dimethyl sulfoxide and 4‐acetylpyridine in their dimethyl sulfoxide and tetrahydrofuran solvates

Crystals of the title compounds, 20‐(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin‐5⁴,10⁴,15⁴‐tribenzoic acid–dimethyl sulfoxide (2/5), C₄₆H₂₉N₅O₆·2.5C₂H₆OS, (I), and 20‐(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin‐5⁴,10⁴,15⁴‐tribenzoic acid–4‐acetylpyridine–tetrahydrofuran (1/2/10), C₄₆H₂₉N₅O₆·2C₇H₇NO·10C₄H₈O, (II), consist of hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular chains of porphyrin units solvated by molecules of dimethyl sulfoxide [in (I)] and 4‐acetylpyridine [in (II)]. In (I), these chains consist of heterogeneous arrays with alternating porphyrin and dimethyl sulfoxide species, being sustained by COOH...O=S hydrogen bonds. They adopt a zigzag geometry and link on both sides to additional molecules of dimethyl sulfoxide. In (II), the chains consist of homogeneous linear supramolecular arrays of porphyrin units, which are directly connected to one another via COOH...N(pyridyl) hydrogen bonds. As in the previous case, these arrays are solvated on both sides by molecules of the 4‐acetylpyridine ligand via similar COOH(porphyrin)...N(ligand) hydrogen bonds. The two crystal structures contain wide interporphyrin voids, which accommodate disordered/diffused solvent molecules, viz. dimethyl sulfoxide in (I) and tetrahydrofuran in (II).     

Hydrogen‐bonded sheets in the 1:1 cocrystal of biphenyl‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid with 2,5‐di‐4‐pyrid­yl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole

The combination of biphenyl‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂bpa) and the bent dipyridyl base 2,5‐di‐4‐pyridyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole (4‐bpo) in a 1:1 molar ratio leads to the formation of the mol­ecular cocrystal (H₂bpa)·(4‐bpo) or C₁₄H₁₀O₄·C₁₂H₈N₄O. The asymmetric unit contains one‐half of an H₂bpa unit lying across a centre of inversion and one‐half of a 4‐bpo mol­ecule lying across a twofold rotation axis. Inter­molecular O—H⋯N inter­actions connect the acid and base mol­ecules to form a one‐dimensional zigzag chain. Through further weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between adjacent chains, a two‐dimensional sheet‐like supramolecular network is afforded. As an extended analogue of terephthalic acid (H₂tp), the backbone geometry of H₂bpa has an evident influence on the hydrogen‐bonding pattern of the title cocrystal compared with that of (H₂tp)·(4‐bpo).     

2‐(Benzoylsulfanyl)acetic acid and 2,5‐dioxopyrrolidin‐1‐yl 2‐(benzoylsulfanyl)acetate by powder X‐ray diffraction studies

The structures of the title compounds, C₉H₈O₃S, (I), and C₁₃H₁₁NO₅S, (II), were determined by X‐ray powder diffraction. Both were solved using the direct‐space parallel tempering algorithm and refined using the Rietveld method. In (I), the C—S—C bond angle is slightly smaller than normal, indicating more p character in the bonding orbitals of the S atom. The carboxylic acid group joins across an inversion centre to form a dimer. The crystal packing includes a weak C—H...O hydrogen bond between an aromatic C—H group and a carboxylic acid O atom to form a two‐dimensional network parallel to (10). The C—S—C bond angle in (II) is larger than its counterpart in (I), indicating that the S atom of (II) has less p character in its bonding orbitals than that of (I), according to Bent's rule. The crystal structure of (II) includes weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds between the H atoms of the methylene groups and carbonyl O atoms, forming a three‐dimensional network.     

Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded networks in adeninium phenylacetate phenylacetic acid monohydrate and adeninium 3‐carboxypropionate monohydrate

In the title compounds, C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₈H₇O₂⁻·C₈H₈O₂·H₂O, (I), and C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻·H₂O, (II), the adeninium cations form N—H...O hydrogen bonds with their anion counterparts and adeninium–adeninium self‐association base pairs with the R₂²(10) motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). A complete hydrogen‐bonding motif analysis is presented. Conventional hydrogen bonds lead to layer structures in (I) and to two‐dimensional infinite polymeric ribbons in (II). C—H...O interactions are found in both structures, while weak π–π stacking interactions are only observed in (I).     

Four oxoindole‐linked α‐alkoxy‐β‐amino acid derivatives

Four structures of oxoindolyl α‐hydroxy‐β‐amino acid derivatives, namely, methyl 2‐{3‐[(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)amino]‐1‐methyl‐2‐oxoindolin‐3‐yl}‐2‐methoxy‐2‐phenylacetate, C₂₄H₂₈N₂O₆, (I), methyl 2‐{3‐[(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)amino]‐1‐methyl‐2‐oxoindolin‐3‐yl}‐2‐ethoxy‐2‐phenylacetate, C₂₅H₃₀N₂O₆, (II), methyl 2‐{3‐[(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)amino]‐1‐methyl‐2‐oxoindolin‐3‐yl}‐2‐[(4‐methoxybenzyl)oxy]‐2‐phenylacetate, C₃₁H₃₄N₂O₇, (III), and methyl 2‐[(anthracen‐9‐yl)methoxy]‐2‐{3‐[(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)amino]‐1‐methyl‐2‐oxoindolin‐3‐yl}‐2‐phenylacetate, C₃₈H₃₆N₂O₆, (IV), have been determined. The diastereoselectivity of the chemical reaction involving α‐diazoesters and isatin imines in the presence of benzyl alcohol is confirmed through the relative configuration of the two stereogenic centres. In esters (I) and (III), the amide group adopts an anti conformation, whereas the conformation is syn in esters (II) and (IV). Nevertheless, the amide group forms intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds with the ester and ether O atoms in all four structures. The ether‐linked substituents are in the extended conformation in all four structures. Ester (II) is dominated by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen‐bond interactions. In contrast, the remaining three structures are sustained by C—H...O hydrogen‐bond interactions.