Locating and total dominating sets in trees

A set S of vertices in a graph G=(V,E) is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of V is adjacent to a vertex in S. We consider total dominating sets of minimum cardinality which have the additional property that distinct vertices of V are totally dominated by distinct subsets of the total dominating set.     

Domination versus disjunctive domination in graphs

A dominating set in a graph G is a set S of vertices of G such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex of S. The domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. For a positive integer b, a set S of vertices in a graph G is a b-disjunctive dominating set in G if every vertex v not in S is adjacent to a vertex of S or has at least b vertices in S at distance 2 from it in G. The b-disjunctive domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a b-disjunctive dominating set. In this paper, we continue the study of disjunctive domination in graphs. We present properties of b-disjunctive dominating sets in a graph. A characterization of minimal b-disjunctive dominating sets is given. We obtain bounds on the ratio of the domination number and the b-disjunctive domination number for various families of graphs, including regular graphs and trees.     

Bounds on the <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-tuple domatic number of a graph

Let k be a positive integer, and let G be a simple graph with vertex set V (G). A vertex of a graph G dominates itself and all vertices adjacent to it. A subset S ⊆ V (G) is a k-tuple dominating set of G if each vertex of V (G) is dominated by at least k vertices in S. The k-tuple domatic number of G is the largest number of sets in a partition of V (G) into k-tuple dominating sets.     

Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three

A set S of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set, if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. We prove that, if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least 3, then γ_t(G) ≤ 7n/13. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34:9–19, 2000     

Finding minimum dominating cycles in permutation graphs

A dominating cycle for a graph G = (V, E) is a subset C of V which has the following properties: (i) the subgraph of G induced by C has a Hamiltonian cycle, and (ii) every vertex of V is adjacent to some vertex of C. In this paper, we develop an O(n²) algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality dominating cycle in a permutation graph. We also show that a minimum cardinality dominating cycle in a permutation graph always has an even number of vertices unless it is isomorphic to C₃.     

Degree-regular triangulations of torus and Klein bottle

A triangulation of a connected closed surface is called weakly regular if the action of its automorphism group on its vertices is transitive. A triangulation of a connected closed surface is called degree-regular if each of its vertices have the same degree. Clearly, a weakly regular triangulation is degree-regular. In [8], Lutz has classified all the weakly regular triangulations on at most 15 vertices. In [5], Datta and Nilakantan have classified all the degree-regular triangulations of closed surfaces on at most 11 vertices. In this article, we have proved that any degree-regular triangulation of the torus is weakly regular. We have shown that there exists ann-vertex degree-regular triangulation of the Klein bottle if and only if n is a composite number ≥ 9. We have constructed two distinctn-vertex weakly regular triangulations of the torus for eachn ≥ 12 and a (4m + 2)-vertex weakly regular triangulation of the Klein bottle for eachm ≥ 2. For 12 ≤n ≤ 15, we have classified all then-vertex degree-regular triangulations of the torus and the Klein bottle. There are exactly 19 such triangulations, 12 of which are triangulations of the torus and remaining 7 are triangulations of the Klein bottle. Among the last 7, only one is weakly regular.     

On Trees with Double Domination Number Equal to the 2-Outer-Independent Domination Number Plus One

A vertex of a graph is said to dominate itself and all of its neighbors.A double dominating set of a graph G is a set D of vertices of G,such that every vertex of G is dominated by at least two vertices of D.The double domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a double dominating set of G.For a graph G =(V,E),a subset D V(G) is a 2-dominating set if every vertex of V(G) \ D has at least two neighbors in D,while it is a 2-outer-independent dominating set of G if additionally the set V(G)\D is independent.The 2-outer-independent domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a 2-outer-independent dominating set of G.This paper characterizes all trees with the double domination number equal to the 2-outer-independent domination number plus one.     

Restrained Domination in Claw-Free Graphs with Minimum Degree at Least Two

Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A set \({S\subseteq V}\) is a restrained dominating set if every vertex in V ? S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V ? S. The restrained domination number of G, denoted γ _r (G), is the smallest cardinality of a restrained dominating set of G. We will show that if G is claw-free with minimum degree at least two and \({G\notin \{C_{4},C_{5},C_{7},C_{8},C_{11},C_{14},C_{17}\}}\) , then \({\gamma_{r}(G)\leq \frac{2n}{5}.}\)     

Independent domination in chordal graphs

A graph chordal if it does not contain any cycle of length greater than three as an induced subgraph. A set of S of vertices of a graph G = (V,E) is independent if not two vertices in S are adjacent, and is dominating if every vertex in V?S is adjacent to some vertex in S. We present a linear algorithm to locate a minimum weight independent dominating set in a chordal graph with 0–1 vertex weights.     

Characterizations of trees with equal domination parameters

Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A set S ⊆ V is a restrained dominating set, if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V − S. The restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_r(G), is the minimum cardinality of a restrained dominating set of G. A set S ⊆ V is a weak dominating set of G if, for every u in V − S, there exists a v ∈ S such that uv ∈ E and deg u ≥ deg v. The weak domination number of G, denoted by γ_w(G), is the minimum cardinality of a weak dominating set of G. In this article, we provide a constructive characterization of those trees with equal independent domination and restrained domination numbers. A constructive characterization of those trees with equal independent domination and weak domination numbers is also obtained. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 142–153, 2000     

Trees with Equal Domination and Restrained Domination Numbers

Let G = (V,E) be a graph and let S V. The set S is a packing in G if the vertices of S are pairwise at distance at least three apart in G. The set S is a dominating set (DS) if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to a vertex in S. Further, if every vertex in V − S is also adjacent to a vertex in V − S, then S is a restrained dominating set (RDS). The domination number of G, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a DS of G, while the restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_r(G), is the minimum cardinality of a RDS of G. The graph G is γ-excellent if every vertex of G belongs to some minimum DS of G. A constructive characterization of trees with equal domination and restrained domination numbers is presented. As a consequence of this characterization we show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) T is a tree with γ(T)=γ_r(T); (ii) T is a γ-excellent tree and T ≠ K₂; and (iii) T is a tree that has a unique maximum packing and this set is a dominating set of T. We show that if T is a tree of order n with ℓ leaves, then γ_r(T) ≤ (n + ℓ + 1)/2, and we characterize those trees achieving equality.     

Graphs with Average Degree Smaller Than {\frac {30}{11}} Burn Slowly

In this paper, we consider the following firefighter problem on a finite graph G =  (V, E). Suppose that a fire breaks out at a given vertex ${v \in V}$ . In each subsequent time unit, a firefighter protects one vertex which is not yet on fire, and then the fire spreads to all unprotected neighbours of the vertices on fire. The objective of the firefighter is to save as many vertices as possible. The surviving rate ${\rho(G)}$ of G is defined as the expected percentage of vertices that can be saved when a fire breaks out at a random vertex of G. Let ε >  0. We show that any graph G on n vertices with at most ${(\frac {15}{11} - \varepsilon)n}$ edges can be well protected, that is, ${\rho(G) > \frac {\varepsilon}{60} > 0}$ . Moreover, a construction of a random graph is proposed to show that the constant ${\frac {15}{11}}$ cannot be improved.     

Dominating sets of the comaximal and ideal-based zero-divisor graphs of commutative rings

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring with nonzero identity, and let I be an ideal of R. The ideal-based zero-divisor graph of R, denoted by Γ_I (R), is the graph whose vertices are the set {x ∈ R \ I| xy ∈ I for some y∈ R \ I} and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if xy ∈ I. Define the comaximal graph of R, denoted by CG(R), to be a graph whose vertices are the elements of R, where two distinct vertices a and b are adjacent if and only if Ra+Rb=R. A nonempty set S ? V of a graph G=(V, E) is a dominating set of G if every vertex in V is either in S or is adjacent to a vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality among the dominating sets of G. The main object of this paper is to study the dominating sets and domination number of Γ_I (R) and the comaximal graph CG₂(R) \ J (R) (or CGJ (R) for short) where CG₂(R) is the subgraph of CG(R) induced on the nonunit elements of R and J (R) is the Jacobson radical of R.     

Bounds on cost effective domination numbers

A vertex υ in a set S is said to be cost effective if it is adjacent to at least as many vertices in V\S as it is in S and is very cost effective if it is adjacent to more vertices in V\S than to vertices in S. A dominating set S is (very) cost effective if every vertex in S is (very) cost effective. The minimum cardinality of a (very) cost effective dominating set of G is the (very) cost effective domination number of G. Our main results include a quadratic upper bound on the very cost effective domination number of a graph in terms of its domination number. The proof of this result gives a linear upper bound for hereditarily sparse graphs which include trees. We show that no such linear bound exists for graphs in general, even when restricted to bipartite graphs. Further, we characterize the extremal trees attaining the bound. Noting that the very cost effective domination number is bounded below by the domination number, we show that every value of the very cost effective domination number between these lower and upper bounds for trees is realizable. Similar results are given for the cost effective domination number.     

Dominating Sets of Some Graphs Associated to Commutative Rings

Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A set S ? V is a dominating set of G if every vertex in V is either in S or is adjacent to a vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality among the dominating sets of G. The main object of this article is to study and characterize the dominating sets of the zero-divisor graph Γ(R) and ideal-based zero-divisor graph Γ _I (R) of a commutative ring R.     

A Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination

A directed dominating set in a directed graph D is a set S of vertices of V such that every vertex u∈V(D)?S has an adjacent vertex v in S with v directed to u. The directed domination number of D, denoted by γ(D), is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in D. The directed domination number of a graph G, denoted Γ_d(G), is the maximum directed domination number γ(D) over all orientations D of G. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by Erd?s [P. Erd?s On a problem in graph theory, Math. Gaz. 47 (1963) 220–222], albeit in a disguised form. In this paper we prove a Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination in oriented graphs. Applying this lemma, we obtain bounds on the directed domination number. In particular, if α denotes the independence number of a graph G, we show that α≤Γ_d(G)≤α(1+2ln(n/α)).     

Nordhaus-Gaddum results for restrained domination and total restrained domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S⊆V is a total restrained dominating set if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex of V-S is adjacent to a vertex in V-S. A set S⊆V is a restrained dominating set if every vertex in V-S is adjacent to a vertex in S and to a vertex in V-S. The total restrained domination number of G (restrained domination number of G, respectively), denoted by γ_tr(G) (γ_r(G), respectively), is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set (restrained dominating set, respectively) of G. We bound the sum of the total restrained domination numbers of a graph and its complement, and provide characterizations of the extremal graphs achieving these bounds. It is known (see [G.S. Domke, J.H. Hattingh, S.T. Hedetniemi, R.C. Laskar, L.R. Markus, Restrained domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 203 (1999) 61-69.]) that if G is a graph of order n?2 such that both G and are not isomorphic to P₃, then . We also provide characterizations of the extremal graphs G of order n achieving these bounds.     

Constructive characterizations of （γp, γ）- and （γp, γpr）-trees

Let G = （V, E） be a graph without isolated vertices. A set S lohtain in V is a domination set of G if every vertex in V - S is adjacent to a vertex in S, that is N[S] = V. The domination number of G, denoted by γ（G）, is the minimum cardinality of a domination set of G. A set S lohtain in V is a paired-domination set of G if S is a domination set of G and the induced subgraph G[S] has a perfect matching. The paired-domination number, denoted by γpr（G）, is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a paired-domination set S in G. A subset S lohtain in V is a power domination set of G if all vertices of V can be observed recursively by the following rules： （i） all vertices in N[S] are observed initially, and （ii） if an observed vertex u has all neighbors observed except one neighbor v, then v is observed （by u）. The power domination number, denoted by γp（G）, is the minimum cardinality of a power domination set of G. In this paper, the constructive characterizations for trees with γp=γ and γpr = γp are provided respectively.     

Total domination changing and stable graphs upon vertex removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination vertex removal stable if the removal of an arbitrary vertex leaves the total domination number unchanged. On the other hand, a graph is total domination vertex removal changing if the removal of an arbitrary vertex changes the total domination number. In this paper, we study total domination vertex removal changing and stable graphs.