List Ramsey numbers

We introduce a list‐coloring extension of classical Ramsey numbers. We investigate when the two Ramsey numbers are equal, and in general, how far apart they can be from each other. We find graph sequences where the two are equal and where they are far apart. For $?$‐uniform cliques we prove that the list Ramsey number is bounded by an exponential function, while it is well known that the Ramsey number is superexponential for uniformity at least 3. This is in great contrast to the graph case where we cannot even decide the question of equality for cliques.     

Star-critical Ramsey numbers

The graph Ramsey numberR(G,H) is the smallest integer r such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the largest star that can be removed from K_r such that the underlying graph is still forced to have a red G or a blue H. Thus, we introduce the star-critical Ramsey numberr_∗(G,H) as the smallest integer k such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r−K_1,r−1−k contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the star-critical Ramsey number for trees versus complete graphs, multiple copies of K₂ and K₃, and paths versus a 4-cycle. In addition to finding the star-critical Ramsey numbers, the critical graphs are classified for R(T_n,K_m), R(nK₂,mK₂) and R(P_n,C₄).     

Size bipartite Ramsey numbers

Let B, B₁ and B₂ be bipartite graphs, and let B→(B₁,B₂) signify that any red-blue edge-coloring of B contains either a red B₁ or a blue B₂. The size bipartite Ramsey number is defined as the minimum number of edges of a bipartite graph B such that B→(B₁,B₂). It is shown that is linear on n with m fixed, and is between c₁n²2ⁿ and c₂n³2ⁿ for some positive constants c₁ and c₂.     

ContributionsChromatic Ramsey numbers

Suppose G is a graph. The chromatic Ramsey number r_c(G) of G is the least integer m such that there exists a graph F of chromatic number m for which the following is true: for any 2-colouring of the edges of F there is a monochromatic subgraph isomorphic to G. Let M_n = min[r_c(G): χ(G) = n]. It was conjectured by Burr et al. (1976) that M_n = (n − 1)² + 1. This conjecture has been confirmed previously for n 4. In this paper, we shall prove that the conjecture is true for n = 5. We shall also improve the upper bounds for M₆ and M₇.     

Linear Ramsey numbers of sparse graphs

The Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) of two graphs G₁ and G₂ is the least integer p so that either a graph G of order p contains a copy of G₁ or its complement G^c contains a copy of G₂. In 1973, Burr and Erd?s offered a total of $25 for settling the conjecture that there is a constant c = c(d) so that R(G,G)≤ c|V(G)| for all d‐degenerate graphs G, i.e., the Ramsey numbers grow linearly for d‐degenerate graphs. We show in this paper that the Ramsey numbers grow linearly for degenerate graphs versus some sparser graphs, arrangeable graphs, and crowns for example. This implies that the Ramsey numbers grow linearly for degenerate graphs versus graphs with bounded maximum degree, planar graphs, or graphs without containing any topological minor of a fixed clique, etc. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities for the fractional and circular chromatic numbers

For a graph G on n vertices with chromatic number χ(G), the Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities state that , and . Much analysis has been done to derive similar inequalities for other graph parameters, all of which are integer-valued. We determine here the optimal Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities for the circular chromatic number and the fractional chromatic number, the first examples of Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities where the graph parameters are rational-valued.     

Size Ramsey numbers for some regular graphs

P. Erdös, R.J. Faudree, C.C. Rousseau and R.H. Schelp [P. Erdös, R.J. Faudree, C.C. Rousseau, R.H. Schelp, The size Ramsey number, Period. Math. Hungar. 9 (1978) 145-161] studied the asymptotic behaviour of for certain graphs G,H. In this paper there will be given a lower bound for the diagonal size Ramsey number of K_n,n,n. The result is a generalization of a theorem for K_n,n given by P. Erdös and C.C. Rousseau [P. Erdös, C.C. Rousseau, The size Ramsey numbers of a complete bipartite graph, Discrete Math. 113 (1993) 259-262].Moreover, an open question for bounds for size Ramsey number of each n-regular graph of order n+t for t>n−1 is posed.     

Some properties of Ramsey numbers

In this paper, some properties of Ramsey numbers are studied, and the following results are presented.

1. (1) For any positive integers k₁, k₂, …, k_m l₁, l₂, …, l_m (m> 1), we have

.

2. (2) For any positive integers k₁, k₂, …, k_m, l₁, l₂, …, l_n , we have

. Based on the known results of Ramsey numbers, some results of upper bounds and lower bounds of Ramsey numbers can be directly derived by those properties.

     

Conditions on Ramsey Nonequivalence

Given a graph H , a graph G is called a Ramsey graph of H if there is a monochromatic copy of H in every coloring of the edges of G with two colors. Two graphs G , H are called Ramsey equivalent if they have the same set of Ramsey graphs. Fox et al. (J Combin Theory Ser B 109 (2014), 120–133) asked whether there are two nonisomorphic connected graphs that are Ramsey equivalent. They proved that a clique is not Ramsey equivalent to any other connected graph. Results of Ne?et?il et al. showed that any two graphs with different clique number (Combinatorica 1(2) (1981), 199–202) or different odd girth (Comment Math Univ Carolin 20(3) (1979), 565–582) are not Ramsey equivalent. These are the only structural graph parameters we know that “distinguish” two graphs in the above sense. This article provides further supportive evidence for a negative answer to the question of Fox et al. by claiming that for wide classes of graphs, the chromatic number is a distinguishing parameter. In addition, it is shown here that all stars and paths and all connected graphs on at most five vertices are not Ramsey equivalent to any other connected graph. Moreover, two connected graphs are not Ramsey equivalent if they belong to a special class of trees or to classes of graphs with clique‐reduction properties.     

Size Ramsey numbers of stars versus cliques

The size Ramsey number of two graphs and is the smallest integer such that there exists a graph on edges with the property that every red-blue colouring of the edges of yields a red copy of or a blue copy of . In 1981, Erdős observed that and he conjectured that this upper bound on is sharp. In 1983, Faudree and Sheehan extended this conjecture as follows: They proved the case . In 2001, Pikhurko showed that this conjecture is not true for and , by disproving the mentioned conjecture of Erdős. Here, we prove Faudree and Sheehan's conjecture for a given and .     

Lower bounds for multicolor classical Ramsey numbers

A method is put forward to establish the lower bounds for somen-color classical Ramsey numbers . With this method six new explicit lower boundsR ₄(4) ≥458,R ₃(5) ≥ 242,R ₃(6)≥1070,R ₃(7) ≥ 1214,R ₃(8) ≥2834 andR ₃(9) ≥ 5282 are obtained using a computer. Project supported by Guangxi Natural Science Foundation     

Star chromatic numbers of some planar graphs

The concept of the star chromatic number of a graph was introduced by Vince (A. Vince, Star chromatic number, J. Graph Theory 12 (1988), 551–559), which is a natural generalization of the chromatic number of a graph. This paper calculates the star chromatic numbers of three infinite families of planar graphs. More precisely, the first family of planar graphs has star chromatic numbers consisting of two alternating infinite decreasing sequences between 3 and 4; the second family of planar graphs has star chromatic numbers forming an infinite decreasing sequence between 3 and 4; and the third family of planar graphs has star chromatic number 7/2. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 33–42, 1998     

7个经典Ramsey数R(k,l)的新下界

利用构造性的方法,得到7个经典Ramsey数的新下界R(3,29)≥174,R(4,23)≥272,R(5,24)≥488,R(7,12)≥312,R(8,18)≥728,R(8,20)≥860,R(9,21)≥1278.     

Multichromatic numbers,star chromatic numbers and Kneser graphs

We investigate the relation between the multichromatic number (discussed by Stahl and by Hilton, Rado and Scott) and the star chromatic number (introduced by Vince) of a graph. Denoting these by χ* and η*, the work of the above authors shows that χ*(G) = η*(G) if G is bipartite, an odd cycle or a complete graph. We show that χ*(G) ≤ η*(G) for any finite simple graph G. We consider the Kneser graphs , for which χ* = m/n and η*(G)/χ*(G) is unbounded above. We investigate particular classes of these graphs and show that η* = 3 and η* = 4; (n ≥ 1), and η* = m - 2; (m ≥ 4). © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 26: 137–145, 1997     

Fractional chromatic number and circular chromatic number for distance graphs with large clique size

An Erratum has been published for this article in Journal of Graph Theory 48: 329–330, 2005 . Let M be a set of positive integers. The distance graph generated by M, denoted by G(Z, M), has the set Z of all integers as the vertex set, and edges ij whenever |i?j| ∈ M. We investigate the fractional chromatic number and the circular chromatic number for distance graphs, and discuss their close connections with some number theory problems. In particular, we determine the fractional chromatic number and the circular chromatic number for all distance graphs G(Z, M) with clique size at least |M|, except for one case of such graphs. For the exceptional case, a lower bound for the fractional chromatic number and an upper bound for the circular chromatic number are presented; these bounds are sharp enough to determine the chromatic number for such graphs. Our results confirm a conjecture of Rabinowitz and Proulx 22 on the density of integral sets with missing differences, and generalize some known results on the circular chromatic number of distance graphs and the parameter involved in the Wills' conjecture 26 (also known as the “lonely runner conjecture” 1 ). © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 47: 129–146, 2004