On the Minimum Number of Spanning Trees in k‐Edge‐Connected Graphs

We show that a k‐edge‐connected graph on n vertices has at least spanning trees. This bound is tight if k is even and the extremal graph is the n‐cycle with edge multiplicities . For k odd, however, there is a lower bound , where . Specifically, and . Not surprisingly, c₃ is smaller than the corresponding number for 4‐edge‐connected graphs. Examples show that . However, we have no examples of 5‐edge‐connected graphs with fewer spanning trees than the n‐cycle with all edge multiplicities (except one) equal to 3, which is almost 6‐regular. We have no examples of 5‐regular 5‐edge‐connected graphs with fewer than spanning trees, which is more than the corresponding number for 6‐regular 6‐edge‐connected graphs. The analogous surprising phenomenon occurs for each higher odd edge connectivity and regularity.     

Aztec Diamonds, Checkerboard Graphs, and Spanning Trees

This note derives the characteristic polynomial of a graph that represents nonjump moves in a generalized game of checkers. The number of spanning trees is also determined.     

Expression for the Number of Spanning Trees of Line Graphs of Arbitrary Connected Graphs

For any graph G, let be the number of spanning trees of G, be the line graph of G, and for any nonnegative integer r, be the graph obtained from G by replacing each edge e by a path of length connecting the two ends of e. In this article, we obtain an expression for in terms of spanning trees of G by a combinatorial approach. This result generalizes some known results on the relation between and and gives an explicit expression if G is of order and size in which s vertices are of degree 1 and the others are of degree k. Thus we prove a conjecture on for such a graph G.     

Multi-Faithful Spanning Trees of Infinite Graphs

For an end and a tree T of a graph G we denote respectively by m() and m _T () the maximum numbers of pairwise disjoint rays of G and T belonging to , and we define tm() := min{m _T(): T is a spanning tree of G}. In this paper we give partial answers — affirmative and negative ones — to the general problem of determining if, for a function f mapping every end of G to a cardinal f() such that tm() f() m(), there exists a spanning tree T of G such that m _T () = f() for every end of G.     

Anti‐Ramsey Problems for t Edge‐Disjoint Rainbow Spanning Subgraphs: Cycles,Matchings, or Trees

We seek the maximum number of colors in an edge‐coloring of the complete graph not having t edge‐disjoint rainbow spanning subgraphs of specified types. Let , , and denote the answers when the spanning subgraphs are cycles, matchings, or trees, respectively. We prove for and for . We prove for and for . We also provide constructions for the more general problem in which colorings are restricted so that colors do not appear on more than q edges at a vertex.     

弦图的补图的最小填充

从图论观点讲,最小填充问题就是在一个图G中添加边集F,使得图G的母图G F是一个弦图而且所添边的边数| F|是最小的,其中最小值| F|称为图G的填充数,表示为f( G) .对一般图来说,最小填充问题是NP-困难的,但是对一些特殊图类来说,这个问题是在多项式时间内可解的.本文给出了弦图的补图-G的填充数f(-G) .     

Spanning Trees with Vertices Having Large Degrees

Let G be a connected simple graph, and let f be a mapping from to the set of integers. This paper is concerned with the existence of a spanning tree in which each vertex v has degree at least . We show that if for any nonempty subset , then a connected graph G has a spanning tree such that for all , where is the set of neighbors v of vertices in S with , , and is the degree of x in T. This is an improvement of several results, and the condition is best possible.     

Edge‐Disjoint Spanning Trees,Edge Connectivity,and Eigenvalues in Graphs

Let and denote the second largest eigenvalue and the maximum number of edge‐disjoint spanning trees of a graph G, respectively. Motivated by a question of Seymour on the relationship between eigenvalues of a graph G and bounds of , Cioab? and Wong conjectured that for any integers and a d‐regular graph G, if , then . They proved the conjecture for , and presented evidence for the cases when . Thus the conjecture remains open for . We propose a more general conjecture that for a graph G with minimum degree , if , then . In this article, we prove that for a graph G with minimum degree δ, each of the following holds.

• (i) For , if and , then .
• (ii) For , if and , then .

Our results sharpen theorems of Cioab? and Wong and give a partial solution to Cioab? and Wong's conjecture and Seymour's problem. We also prove that for a graph G with minimum degree , if , then the edge connectivity is at least k, which generalizes a former result of Cioab?. As corollaries, we investigate the Laplacian and signless Laplacian eigenvalue conditions on and edge connectivity.     

几乎无爪图的叶子数较少的生成树

A spanning tree with no more than 3 leaves is called a spanning 3-ended tree.In this paper, we prove that if G is a k-connected(k ≥ 2) almost claw-free graph of order n and σ_(k+3)(G) ≥ n + k + 2, then G contains a spanning 3-ended tree, where σk(G) =min{∑_(v∈S)deg(v) : S is an independent set of G with |S| = k}.     

Connected Factors and Spanning Trees in Graphs

 Let G be a graph, and g, f, f′ be positive integer-valued functions defined on V(G). If an f′-factor of G is a spanning tree, we say that it is f′-tree. In this paper, it is shown that G contains a connected (g, f+f′−1)-factor if G has a (g, f)-factor and an f′-tree. Received: October 30, 2000 Final version received: August 20, 2002     

Bounding the Clique‐Width of H‐Free Chordal Graphs

A graph is H‐free if it has no induced subgraph isomorphic to H. Brandstädt, Engelfriet, Le, and Lozin proved that the class of chordal graphs with independence number at most 3 has unbounded clique‐width. Brandstädt, Le, and Mosca erroneously claimed that the gem and co‐gem are the only two 1‐vertex P₄‐extensions H for which the class of H‐free chordal graphs has bounded clique‐width. In fact we prove that bull‐free chordal and co‐chair‐free chordal graphs have clique‐width at most 3 and 4, respectively. In particular, we find four new classes of H‐free chordal graphs of bounded clique‐width. Our main result, obtained by combining new and known results, provides a classification of all but two stubborn cases, that is, with two potential exceptions we determine all graphs H for which the class of H‐free chordal graphs has bounded clique‐width. We illustrate the usefulness of this classification for classifying other types of graph classes by proving that the class of ‐free graphs has bounded clique‐width via a reduction to K₄‐free chordal graphs. Finally, we give a complete classification of the (un)boundedness of clique‐width of H‐free weakly chordal graphs.     

Minors in ‐ Chromatic Graphs,II

Let denote the graph obtained from the complete graph by deleting the edges of some ‐subgraph. The author proved earlier that for each fixed s and , every graph with chromatic number has a minor. This confirmed a partial case of the corresponding conjecture by Woodall and Seymour. In this paper, we show that the statement holds already for much smaller t, namely, for .     

On Non‐Hamiltonian Graphs for which every Vertex‐Deleted Subgraph Is Traceable

We call a graph G a platypus if G is non‐hamiltonian, and for any vertex v in G, the graph is traceable. Every hypohamiltonian and every hypotraceable graph is a platypus, but there exist platypuses that are neither hypohamiltonian nor hypotraceable. Among other things, we give a sharp lower bound on the size of a platypus depending on its order, draw connections to other families of graphs, and solve two open problems of Wiener. We also prove that there exists a k‐connected platypus for every .     

The Average Degree of Minimally Contraction‐Critically 5‐Connected Graphs

An edge of a 5‐connected graph is said to be 5‐removable (resp. 5‐contractible) if the removal (resp. the contraction) of the edge results in a 5‐connected graph. A 5‐connected graph with neither 5‐removable edges nor 5‐contractible edges is said to be minimally contraction‐critically 5‐connected. We show the average degree of every minimally contraction‐critically 5‐connected graph is less than . This bound is sharp in the sense that for any positive real number ε, there is a minimally contraction‐critically 5‐connected graph whose average degree is greater than .     

Leaf‐Critical and Leaf‐Stable Graphs

The minimum leaf number ml(G) of a connected graph G is defined as the minimum number of leaves of the spanning trees of G if G is not hamiltonian and 1 if G is hamiltonian. We study nonhamiltonian graphs with the property for each or for each . These graphs will be called ‐leaf‐critical and l‐leaf‐stable, respectively. It is far from obvious whether such graphs exist; for example, the existence of 3‐leaf‐critical graphs (that turn out to be the so‐called hypotraceable graphs) was an open problem until 1975. We show that l‐leaf‐stable and l‐leaf‐critical graphs exist for every integer , moreover for n sufficiently large, planar l‐leaf‐stable and l‐leaf‐critical graphs exist on n vertices. We also characterize 2‐fragments of leaf‐critical graphs generalizing a lemma of Thomassen. As an application of some of the leaf‐critical graphs constructed, we settle an open problem of Gargano et al. concerning spanning spiders. We also explore connections with a family of graphs introduced by Grünbaum in correspondence with the problem of finding graphs without concurrent longest paths.     

Every DFS Tree of a 3‐Connected Graph Contains a Contractible Edge

Tutte proved that every 3‐connected graph G on more than 4 vertices contains a contractible edge. We strengthen this result by showing that every depth‐first‐search tree of G contains a contractible edge. Moreover, we show that every spanning tree of G contains a contractible edge if G is 3‐regular or if G does not contain two disjoint pairs of adjacent degree‐3 vertices.     

Global Connectivity And Expansion: Long Cycles and Factors In f-Connected Graphs

Given a function f : ℕ→ℝ, call an n-vertex graph f-connected if separating off k vertices requires the deletion of at least f(k) vertices whenever k≤(n−f(k))/2. This is a common generalization of vertex connectivity (when f is constant) and expansion (when f is linear). We show that an f-connected graph contains a cycle of length linear in n if f is any linear function, contains a 1-factor and a 2-factor if f(k)≥2k+1, and contains a Hamilton cycle if f(k)≥2(k+1)². We conjecture that linear growth of f suffices to imply hamiltonicity.     

Toughness, degrees and 2-factors

In this paper we generalize a Theorem of Jung which shows that 1-tough graphs with are hamiltonian. Our generalization shows that these graphs contain a wide variety of 2-factors. In fact, these graphs contain not only 2-factors having just one cycle (the hamiltonian case) but 2-factors with k cycles, for any k such that .     

Covering 2‐connected 3‐regular graphs with disjoint paths

A path cover of a graph is a set of disjoint paths so that every vertex in the graph is contained in one of the paths. The path cover number of graph G is the cardinality of a path cover with the minimum number of paths. Reed in 1996 conjectured that a 2‐connected 3‐regular graph has path cover number at most . In this article, we confirm this conjecture.     

Large ‐ or ‐Minors in 3‐Connected Graphs

There are numerous results bounding the circumference of certain 3‐connected graphs. There is no good bound on the size of the largest bond (cocircuit) of a 3‐connected graph, however. Oporowski, Oxley, and Thomas (J Combin Theory Ser B 57 (1993), 2, 239–257) proved the following result in 1993. For every positive integer k, there is an integer such that every 3‐connected graph with at least n vertices contains a ‐ or ‐minor. This result implies that the size of the largest bond in a 3‐connected graph grows with the order of the graph. Oporowski et al. obtained a huge function iteratively. In this article, we first improve the above authors' result and provide a significantly smaller and simpler function . We then use the result to obtain a lower bound for the largest bond of a 3‐connected graph by showing that any 3‐connected graph on n vertices has a bond of size at least . In addition, we show the following: Let G be a 3‐connected planar or cubic graph on n vertices. Then for any , G has a ‐minor with , and thus a bond of size at least .