Radiation degradation of methyl α-chloroacrylate–methacrylonitrile copolymers

The radiation degradation behavior of methyl α-chloroacrylate (MCA) and methacrylonitrile (MCN) copolymers has been investigated as part of a program to develop high-sensitivity polymeric resists for integrated circuit manufacture. High-molecular-weight copolymers were prepared by emulsion techniques. Several different copolymer compositions were prepared varying from 19 to 68 mole % MCA. These copolymers were fractionated and then subjected to γ irradiation from a ⁶⁰Co Source. The G_s - G_s, G_s - 4G_s values were determined from M?;F>n_k^?1 and G_u^?1 versus dose plots, and the G_fs and G_s Values were then calculated. Molecular weights of both unirradiated and irradiated polymers were analyzed by membrane osmometry and gel permeation chromatography. All copolymers exhibited higher degradation susceptibilities than that of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PPMA), which has G_x = 1.3. The individual G_x and G_x values of the copolymers were found to fall between those of the two homopolymers, poly(methyl α-chloroacrylate) (G_x = 6.0) and polymethacrylonitrile (G_x ～ 3.1). The dependence of G_x and G_x values on molecular weight was minor. The crosslinking susceptibility of the poly(methyl α-chloroacrylate) (G_x ～ 0.8), was greatly decreased by copolymerization with MCN. Relatively small amounts of MCN caused a large drop in G_x, i.e., G_x ～ 0.15 at 32% MCN and G_x ～ 0.03 at 51% MCN. The observation could be attributed to the decreasing probability that crosslinking sites, in the MCA monomer units on adjacent chains, would lie in close proximity.     

Dilute solution properties of poly(α-methylstyrene–ethylene) “regular” sequence copolymers

“Regular” sequence copolymers having the structure {[? CH₂? C(CH₃)(C₆H₅)? ]_m(CH₂? CH₂)_n}_p with relatively small values of m and n were prepared by means of “living” polymerization techniques. The intrinsic viscosities of fractions of these copolymers were obtained in various solvents including a theta solvent. The molecular weights of these fractions were determined by the Archibald ultracentrifugal method. The results show that the intrinsic viscosity–molecular weight relations of the regular sequence copolymers are affected not only by the average composition of the copolymer, but also by the sequence length in the copolymer molecule. It is suggested that the effective conformation of a chain element in the copolymer is not always the same as that in the homopolymer.     

Emulsion copolymerization behavior of α-methylstyrene with methacrylonitrile

The emulsion copolymerization behavior of α-methylstyrene with methacrylonitrile is described. The effects of polymerization temperature, potassium persulfate initiator concentration, sodium lauryl sulfate emulsifier concentration on copolymer yield, molecular weight, and rate of copolymerization are described. The copolymer was found to have an azeotropic composition at 43 mole-% AMS. Reactivity ratios were determined to be 0.06 and 0.28 for AMS and MAN, respectively.     

Homogeneous polyblend of poly(vinyl chloride) with α-methylstyrene–methacrylonitrile–ethyl acrylate terpolymer

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and α-methylstyrene–methacrylonitrile–ethyl acrylate (AMS-MAN-EA) terpolymer have been prepared and properties studied. The polyblends are unusual inasmuch as they are transparent and possess a single glass transition; therefore, they are homogeneous. The single T_g suggests a single-phase system. The polyblends exhibit rarely observed polymer–polymer compatibility.     

γ–α transformation in isotactic polypropylene

A γ-phase to α-phase transformation in a specimen of isotactic polypropylene crystallized under conditions of high pressure was induced by drawing at 100°C. X-ray studies showed that the unoriented component remained in the γ-phase, and that the oriented component was found only in the α-phase. This evidence supports a previous suggestion that the phase transformation is martensitic in character. The consequences of such an assumption are discussed. The role of dislocations in polymeric systems is generally believed to be not too significant, but since martensitic reactions involve cooperative movements of atoms, an exception in this case is suggested. A possible mechanism for the phase transformation is suggested.     

α–γ transition in nylon 6

The α to γ transition that occurs in nylon 6 upon iodine treatment was investigated by infrared spectroscopy, differential thermal analysis, and x-ray diffraction techniques. Thin films of nylon (0.2 mil) were treated in either iodine–potassium iodide aqueous solution or in iodine vapor. Very short treatment times, in the order of 30 sec, were found to effect the transition when a solution 0.5M with respect to iodine was used. The infrared spectra of the iodine nylon complexes formed from either the α- or γ-nylon 6 treated in vapor or dissolved iodine were all similar. This is an indication that molecular iodine is the active species in forming the complex. The temperature of the washing solution used to remove the iodine from the nylon determines whether an α-nylon 6 or γ-nylon 6 is obtained from the complex after washing. Nylon 6 plaque surfaces and thin films are similar in their behavior towards the iodine treatment. The γ-nylon 6 is a stable modification at all temperatures below its melting point. The conversion of the γ form back to the α modification can occur only if the hydrogen bonding is severely affected, e.g., by phenol treatment, iodine treatment, melting, etc. Infrared spectroscopy provided no evidence for an α–γ transition in nylon 6 on heating the sample continuously through its melting point. The shapes of the melting peaks in the above two modifications of nylon 6 were sufficiently different to provide a means of identifying the two crystalline forms.     

γ–α Solid–solid transition of isotactic polypropylene

X-ray diffraction patterns have been taken as a function of time and temperature on a sample of polypropylene held under high pressure (4.14 kbar) for 180 hr. at a temperature of 248°C. and subsequently cooled to room temperature. The molded sample initially crystallizes in the triclinic γ–phase but transforms to the γ–phase at elevated temperatures. The rate of conversion from γ to α is a function of time and temperature and tends to approach a constant value with increasing time. The nature of the thermal changes occurring in the sample was also studied by differential scanning calorimetry. It appears that at low scan speeds, there is a solid–solid transformation from the α-phase to the γ–phase, but at high scan speeds, the γ–phase melts without conversion to the α-phase.     

Coupling reaction of poly(α-methylstyryl) anion with (MMA–α-methylstyrene) block copolymer

(MMA–α-methylstyrene)block copolymer was reacted with poly(α-methylstyryl)anion at ?78°C in a mixture of good tetrahydrofuran (THF) and poor methylcyclohexane solvents. The reaction conditions were chosen so as to produce graft copolymers made up of a backbone (AB-type block copolymer) and a single branched chain (1:2 graft copolymer). Gel permeation chromatograph (GPC), osmotic pressure measurement, and elemental analysis were used for the characterization of 1:2 graft copolymer. It appeared that poly(α-methylstyryl)anion reacted with the end pendant groups located farthest away from the branched point of AB-type block copolymer, when the dimensions of AB-type block copolymer molecule are small.     

Thermal properties and morphology of α-methylstyrene-butadiene-α-methylstyrene triblock copolymer

Poly(α-methylstyrene-butadiene-α-methylstyrene) (mSBmS) was synthesized by two stages living anionic polymerization. Sodium naphthalene was used as initiator and HMPT as promoter to accelerate cross-over reactions. The microstructure and composition of mSBmS were identified by infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopes. The domain size was roughly calculated from TEM observation. It was observed that the morphology changed with the composition. The mSBmS exhibited two T_g^s, ?4 and 172°C, that associated with polybutadiene and poly-α-methylstyrene, respectively. Comparing stress relaxation behaviors of mSBmS and styrene-butadienestyrene (SBS) at various temperatures, mSBmS showed a better thermal stability and degradation resistance than SBS. From the thermal gravimetric analysis, at 200°C, mSBmS gave a weight loss less than 1%, which provided a further evidence of better thermal stability of this material than of SBS.     

The α and α parameters for spin polarized Hartree–Fock–Slater calculations

α and α are derived for use in spin polarized Hartree–Fock–Slater programs. They are assumed to depend only on the number of up and down spin electrons in the atom. The calculated eigenvalues show a slight improvement only for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen.     

Protection Group Effects During α,γ‐Diol Lignin Stabilization Promote High‐Selectivity Monomer Production

Protection groups were introduced during biomass pretreatment to stabilize lignin's α,γ‐diol group during its extraction and prevent its condensation. Acetaldehyde and propionaldehyde stabilized the α,γ‐diol without any aromatic ring alkylation, which significantly increased final product selectivity. The subsequent hydrogenolysis catalyzed by Pd/C generated lignin monomers at near‐theoretical yields based on Klason lignin (48 % from birch, 20 % from spruce, 70 % from high‐syringyl transgenic poplar), and with high selectivity to a single 4‐n‐propanolsyringol product (80 %) in the case of the poplar. Unlike direct hydrogenation of native wood, hydrogenolysis of protected lignin with Ni/C also led to high selectivity to this single product (78 %), paving the way to high‐selectivity lignin upgrading with base metal catalysts. The use of extracted lignin facilitated valorization of polysaccharides, leading to high yields of all three major biomass polymers to a single major product.     

Solid‐state conformations of linear depsipeptide amides with an alternating sequence of α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acid and α‐hydroxy acid

Depsipeptides and cyclodepsipeptides are analogues of the corresponding peptides in which one or more amide groups are replaced by ester functions. Reports of crystal structures of linear depsipeptides are rare. The crystal structures and conformational analyses of four depsipeptides with an alternating sequence of an α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acid and an α‐hydroxy acid are reported. The molecules in the linear hexadepsipeptide amide in (S)‐Pms‐Acp‐(S)‐Pms‐Acp‐(S)‐Pms‐Acp‐NMe₂ acetonitrile solvate, C₄₇H₅₈N₄O₉·C₂H₃N, ( 3b ), as well as in the related linear tetradepsipeptide amide (S)‐Pms‐Aib‐(S)‐Pms‐Aib‐NMe₂, C₂₈H₃₇N₃O₆, ( 5a ), the diastereoisomeric mixture (S,R)‐Pms‐Acp‐(R,S)‐Pms‐Acp‐NMe₂/(R,S)‐Pms‐Acp‐(R,S)‐Pms‐Acp‐NMe₂ (1:1), C₃₂H₄₁N₃O₆, ( 5b ), and (R,S)‐Mns‐Acp‐(S,R)‐Mns‐Acp‐NMe₂, C₃₀H₃₇N₃O₆, ( 5c ) (Pms is phenyllactic acid, Acp is 1‐aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid and Mns is mandelic acid), generally adopt a β‐turn conformation in the solid state, which is stabilized by intramolecular N—H…O hydrogen bonds. Whereas β‐turns of type I (or I′) are formed in the cases of ( 3b ), ( 5a ) and ( 5b ), which contain phenyllactic acid, the torsion angles for ( 5c ), which incorporates mandelic acid, indicate a β‐turn in between type I and type III. Intermolecular N—H…O and O—H…O hydrogen bonds link the molecules of ( 3a ) and ( 5b ) into extended chains, and those of ( 5a ) and ( 5c ) into two‐dimensional networks.     

Ortho effects in organic molecules on electron-impact II– Ortho effects in substituted α,α,α-trichloracetanilides

Elimination of trichloromethyl radical from the molecular ion is the abundant fragment in the mass spectra of most of the thirteen substituted trichloracetanilides studied. Unusual ortho effects of ? OCH₃, ? NO₂ and ? COOH groups are noticed only after the initial ejection of trichloromethyl radical from the molecular ion.     

Two phosphonodehydrotripeptides: Boc0–Gly1–Δ(Z)Phe2–α‐Abu3PO3Me2 and Boc0–Gly1–Δ(Z)Phe2–α‐Nva3PO3Et2

The present paper reports the crystal structures of two short phosphonotripeptides (one in two crystal forms) containing one ΔPhe (dehydrophenylalanine) residue, namely dimethyl (3‐{[tert‐butoxycarbonylglycyl‐α,β‐(Z)‐dehydrophenylalanyl]amino}propyl)phosphonate, Boc⁰–Gly¹–Δ(Z)Phe²–α‐Abu³PO₃Me₂, C₂₁H₃₂N₃O₇P, (I), and diethyl (4‐{[tert‐butoxycarbonylglycyl‐α,β‐(Z)‐dehydrophenylalanyl]amino}butyl)phosphonate, Boc⁰–Gly¹–Δ(Z)Phe²–α‐Nva³PO₃Et₂, as the propan‐2‐ol monosolvate 0.122‐hydrate, C₂₄H₃₈N₃O₇P·C₃H₈O·0.122H₂O, (II), and the ethanol monosolvate 0.076‐hydrate, C₂₄H₃₈N₃O₇P·C₂H₆O·0.076H₂O, (III). The crystals of (II) and (III) are isomorphous but differ in the type of solvent. The phosphono group is linked directly to the last C_α atom in the main chain for all three peptides. All the amino acids are trans linked in the main chains. The crystal structures exhibit no intramolecular hydrogen bonds and are stabilized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds only.