Properties of certain algebras between L∞and H∞

The main result of this paper is that if F is a closed subset of the unit circle, then $\text{(H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{+ L}{}_{\mathrm{F}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{)}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is an M-ideal of $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. Consequently, if $\text{? ∈ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ then ? has a closest element in H^∞ + L_F^∞. Furthermore, if $\text{¦F¦ >0}\text{then}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{+ L}{}_{\mathrm{F}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{)}$ is not the dual of any Banach space.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

The resolvent of a singularly perturbed elliptic operator

Let A and B be uniformly elliptic operators of orders 2m and 2n, respectively, m > n. We consider the Dirichlet problems for the equations (?^{2(m ? n)}A + B + λ²ⁿI)u_? = f and (B + λ²ⁿI)u = f in a bounded domain Ω in R^k with a smooth boundary ?Ω. The estimate is derived. This result extends the results of [7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18]by giving estimates up to the boundary, improving the rate of convergence in ?, using lower norms, and considering operators of higher order with variable coefficients. An application to a parabolic boundary value problem is given.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Harmonic analysis on hyperboloids

The regular representation of O(n, N) acting on $\text{L}{}^2\text{(}\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}\text{)}$ is decomposed into a direct integral of irreducible representations. The homogeneous space $\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}$ is realized as the Hyperboloid $\text{H = {(x, t) ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; N}}\text{: ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{? ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= 1}}$. The problem is essentially equivalent to finding the spectral resolution of a certain self-adjoint invariant differential operator □_h on H, which is the tangential part of the operator □ = Δ_x ? Δ_t on R^{n + N}. The spectrum of □_h contains a discrete part (except when N = 1) with eigenfunctions generated by restricting to H solutions of □u = 0 which vanish in the region $\text{¦ t ¦ < ¦ x ¦}$, and a continuous part $\text{H}$_?. As a representation of O(n, N), $\text{H}$_? ⊕ $\text{H}$_? is unitarily equivalent to the regular representation on L² of the cone $\text{{(x, t) : ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{}}$, and the intertwining operator is obtained by solving the equation □u = 0 with given boundary values on the cone. Explicit formulas are given for the spectral decomposition. The special case n = N = 2 gives the Plancherel formula for SL(2, R).     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

Equations du type de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés Riemanniennes compactes,III

Let (V_n, g) be a C^∞ compact Riemannian manifold without boundary. Given the following changes of metric: $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= g +}\text{Hess}\text{? ±}\text{l}\text{α}{}^2\text{(▽ ? ? ▽?),}\text{g}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= ±?g + α}{}^2\text{Hess}\text{?}$, where a is a fixed constant, we study the corresponding Monge-Ampère equations (1)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P,▽?;?)}$, (2)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦}\text{g}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P, ▽?; ?)}$. We first solve Eq. (2)^?, under some simple assumptions on F?C^∞. Then, using an appropriate change of functions that enables us to take advantage of the estimates just carried out for Eq. (2)^?, we extend to Eq.(1)^? all the results proved in our previous articles [5, 6] for the usual Monge-Ampère equation. Although equation (2)⁺ is not locally invertible, and does not even admit a solution for all $\text{F = λ? + ?, λ > 0, f ? C}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(V}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, a similar change of functions leads to partial results about Eq. (1)⁺, via C² and C³ estimates for Eq. (2)⁺. Eventually we give some comments and errata of our previous article (P. Delanoë, J. Funct. Anal.41 (1981), 341–353).     

Trace formulas for a class of Toeplitz-like operators II

Let P_T denote the orthogonal projection of L²(R¹, dΔ) onto the space of entire functions of exponential type ? T which are square summable on the line with respect to the measure $\text{dΔ(γ) = ¦ h(γ)¦}{}^2\text{dγ}$, and let G denote the operator of multiplication by a suitably restricted complex valued function g. It is shown that if $\text{(γ}{}^2\text{+ 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{log}\text{¦ h(γ)¦}$ is summable, if $\text{¦ h ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?2}}$ is locally summable, and if $\text{h}\text{h}{}^{\mathrm{\#}}$ belongs to the span in L^∞ of e^?iyTH^∞:T ? 0, in which h is chosen to be an outer function and h^#(γ) agrees with the complex conjugate of h(γ) on the line, then

$\text{lim trace}\text{T↑∞}\text{{(P}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{GP}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{? P}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{G}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{}}$

exists and is independent of h for every positive integer n. This extends the range of validity of a formula due to Mark Kac who evaluated this limit in the special case h = 1 using a different formalism. It also extends earlier results of the author which were established under more stringent conditions on h. The conclusions are based in part upon a preliminary study of a more general class of projections.     

Spectral representation for Schrödinger operators with long-range potentials

A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R³, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(1</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, grad $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(3</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, $\text{ΛV(x) = O(¦ x}\text{s}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?\delta }}\text{) (δ > 0), Λ}$ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator $\text{F}$ from PL₂(R³) onto $\text{L}{}_2\text{((0, ∞); L}{}_2\text{(Ω)), P}$ being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),

$\text{(α(H)(Pf,g)=}\text{∫}\text{0}\text{∞}\text{(α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L}{}_2\text{(ω) dλ}$

.     

The virial theorem in relativistic quantum mechanics

For a class of potentials including the Coulomb potential q = μr^?1 with ¦ μ ¦ < 1 (1) (i.e., atomic numbers Z ? 137), the virial theorem $\text{(u, α ·}\text{p}\text{u) = (u, r(}\text{?q}\text{?r}\text{)u)}$ is shown to hold, u being an eigenfunction of the operator

$\text{Hu = TU : = (α ·}\text{p}\text{+ β + q)u}$

,

$\text{D(H) = {u ¦ u ∈ [H}{}_{\mathrm{loc}}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}\text{+}{}^3\text{)]}{}^4\text{, r}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{u, TU ∈ [L}{}^2\text{(R)}{}^3\text{]}{}^4\text{}}$

($\text{R}$₊³ := $\text{R}$?{0}). The result implies in particular that H with (1) does not have any eigenvalues embedded in the continuum. The proof uses a scale transformation.     

Square roots of elliptic operators

Consider an elliptic sesquilinear form defined on $\text{V}$ × $\text{V}$ by $\text{J[u, v] = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{v}\text{?}\text{+ α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{u}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ au}\text{v}\text{?}\text{dx}$, where $\text{V}$ is a closed subspace of $\text{H}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$ which contains $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$, Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{, α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, a ? L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω),}\text{and Re}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? κ > 0}$ for all ζ?$\text{C}$ⁿ with ¦ζ¦ = 1. Let L be the operator with largest domain satisfying J[u, v] = (Lu, v) for all υ∈$\text{V}$. Then L + λI is a maximal accretive operator in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ for λ a sufficiently large real number. It is proved that $\text{(L + λI)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is a bounded operator from $\text{V}$ to $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ provided mild regularity of the coefficients is assumed. In addition it is shown that if the coefficients depend differentiably on a parameter t in an appropriate sense, then the corresponding square root operators also depend differentiably on t. The latter result is new even when the forms J are hermitian.     

Problèmes de Neumann non linéaires sur les variétés riemanniennes

Nonlinear Neumann problems on riemannian manifolds. Let ($\text{M}\text{, g}$) be a C^∞ compact riemannian manifold of dimension n ? 2 whose boundary B is an (n ? 1)-dimensional submanifold and let $\text{M =}\text{M}\text{?B}$ be the interior of $\text{M}$. Study of Neumann problems of the form: $\text{Δφ +?(φ, x) = 0}\text{in}\text{M, (}\text{dφ}\text{dn}\text{) + g(φ, y) = 0}\text{on}\text{B}$, where, for every $\text{(t, x, y) ? R × M × B, ¦?(t, x)¦}\text{and}\text{¦g(t, y)¦}$ are bounded by $\text{C(1 + ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}\text{or}\text{C}\text{exp}\text{(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}$. Application to the determination of a conformal metric for which the scalar curvature of M and the mean curvature of B take prescribed values.     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.     

Weak-1 generators for a class of subalgebras of l1

Let α ? 0 and let $\text{D(}\text{α}\text{) = {f(z) = ∑}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{¦ ∑}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(n + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha </mtext>}}\text{¦ a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{¦ < ∞}}$. Then D(α) is a subalgebra of l¹. We discuss the weak-1 generators of D(α). We use some of our techniques to prove that if ? is a weak-1 generator of H^∞ and ∥ ? ∥_∞ ? 1, then the composition operator C_? on the Dirichlet space has dense range.     

The spectra of composition operators on Hp

For H^p, 1 ? p < ∞, composition operators C_?, defined by $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{(?) = ? ° ?}$ for $\text{? ? H}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, ? analytic on $\text{D = {z ¦ ¦ z ¦ < 1}}$ are considered, and their spectra determined in the case where ? is analytic on an open region containing D?.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Global existence for a delay differential equation

An elastic-plastic bar with simply connected cross section Q is clamped at the bottom and given a twist at the top. The stress function u, at a prescribed cross section, is then the solution of the variational inequality (0.1) $\text{min}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>v</mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>K</mtext>}}\text{{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{¦}\text{▽}\text{v¦}{}^2\text{? 2θ}{}_1\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{v} = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{¦}\text{▽}\text{u¦}{}^2\text{? 2θ}{}_1\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{u, u}\text{?}\text{K,}\text{where}\text{(0.2) K = {v}\text{?}\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Q), ¦}\text{▽}\text{v¦ ? 1}\text{a.e.}\text{}}\text{and}\text{θ}{}_1$ is equal to the angle of the twist (after normalizing the units). Introducing the Lagrange multiplier λ_θ1, the unloading problem consists in solving the variational inequality (0.3) is the twisting angle for the unloaded bar; θ₂ < θ₁. Let (0.4) $\text{K}{}^1\text{= {v}\text{?}\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Q), ?d(x) ? v(x) ? d(x)},}\text{where}\text{d(x) =}\text{dist}\text{.(x, ?Q)}$, and denote by $\text{u}{}^1\text{, w}{}^1$ the solutions of (0.1), (0.3), respectively, when K is replaced by $\text{K}{}^1$. The following results are well known for the loading problem (0.1):(0.5) $\text{u = u}{}^1$; (0.6) the plastic set $\text{P = (X}\text{?}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{; ¦}\text{▽}\text{u(x)¦ = 1}}$ is connected to the boundary. In this paper we show that, in general, (0.7) $\text{w ≠ w}{}^1$; (0.8) the plastic set $\text{P}\text{?}\text{= {x}\text{?}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{; ¦}\text{▽}\text{w(x)¦ = 1}}$ is not connected to the boundary. That is, we construct domains Q for which (0.7) and (0.8) hold for a suitable choice of θ₁, θ₂.     

Étude d'une équation de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes

On a compact Kähler manifold of complex dimension m ? 2, let us consider the change of Kähler metric $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{= g}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{+ ?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{φ}$. Let F?C^∞(V × R) be a function everywhere > 0 and v a real number ≠ 0. When $\text{0 < C}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? F(x, t) ? C(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+ 1)}$ for all (x, t) ?V × ] ?∞, t₀], where C and t₀ are constants and $\text{1 ? a <}\text{m}\text{(m ? 1)}$, one exhibits a function φ?C^∞ (V) such that $\text{¦g′∥g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= e}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\nu </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gf</mtext>}}\text{F(x, φ ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf) (¦g¦}\text{and}\text{¦g′¦}$ the determinants of the metrics g and $\text{g′,}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf = (}\text{mes}\text{V)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∝ φ dV)}$.     

On the absolute continuity of Schrödinger operators with spherically symmetric,long-range potentials,II

Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = V_S(r) + V_L. Let λ = lim sup_r→∞V_L(r) < ∞ (we allow λ = ? ∞) and set λ⁺ = max(λ, 0). Assume that for some r₀, V_L(r) ?C^2k(r₀, ∞) and that there exists δ > 0 such that $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dr}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) · (λ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= O(r}{}^{\mathrm{?j\delta }}\text{), j = 1,…, 2k,}\text{as}\text{r → ∞}$. Assume further that $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{dr}\text{¦ V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r)¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{) = ∞}$ and that 2kδ > 1. It is shown that: (a) The restriction of H to C^∞(Rⁿ) is essentially self-adjoint, (b) The essential spectrum of H contains the closure of (λ, ∞). (c) The part of H over (λ, ∞) is absolutely continuous.     

Ultracontractivity and the heat kernel for Schrödinger operators and Dirichlet Laplacians

Abstract connections between integral kernels of positivity preserving semigroups and suitable L^p contractivity properties are established. Then these questions are studied for the semigroups generated by $\text{?Δ + V}\text{and}\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$, the Dirichlet Laplacian for an open, connected region Ω. As an application under a suitable hypothesis, Sobolev estimates are proved valid up to ?Ω, of the form $\text{¦η(x)¦? c?}{}_0\text{(x) ∥H}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{η∥}{}_2$, where ?₀ is the unique positive L² eigenfunction of $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$.