Periodic solutions of nonlinear delay equations

Existence and uniqueness of 2π-periodic solutions of $\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{x(t)}\text{dt}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{+}\text{grad}\text{G(x(t ? τ)) = e(t, x(t), x(t ? τ)) (j = 1, 2)}$, where x(t) is in $\text{R}$ⁿ and e(t, u, v) is a given vector function, 2π-periodic in t, are shown under conditions on the spectrum of the Hessian of G. The equation is studied using a fixed point theorem in the space L²(0, 2π). One feature of this approach is that no relationship between the delay and the period is necessary.     

Generic periodic solutions of functional differential equations

Consider the class of retarded functional differential equations

$\text{x(t) = f(x}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{)}$

, (1) where x_t(θ) = x(t + θ), ?1 ? θ ? 0, so x_t?C = C([?1, 0], Rⁿ), and $\text{f∈}\textcolor{red}{}\text{=C}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(C,R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$. Let 2 ? r ? ∞ and give $\text{X}$ the appropriate (Whitney) topology. Then the set of $\text{f∈}\textcolor{red}{}$ such that all fixed points and all periodic solutions of (¹) are hyperbolic is residual in

.     

A generalization of the fast LUP matrix decomposition algorithm and applications

We show that any m × n matrix A, over any field, can be written as a product, LSP, of three matrices, where L is a lower triangular matrix with l's on the main diagonal, S is an m × n matrix which reduces to an upper triangular matrix with nonzero diagonal elements when the zero rows are deleted, and P is an n × n permutation matrix. Moreover, L, S, and P can be found in O(m^α?1n) time, where the complexity of matrix multiplication is O(m^α). We use the LSP decomposition to construct fast algorithms for some important matrix problems. In particular, we develop O(m^α?1n) algorithms for the following problems, where A is any m × n matrix: (1) Determine if the system of equations $\text{A}\text{x}\text{=}\text{b}$ (where $\text{b}$ is a column vector) has a solution, and if so, find one such solution. (2) Find a generalized inverse, $\text{A}{}^1$, of A (i.e., $\text{AA}{}^1\text{A = A}$). (3) Find simultaneously a maximal independent set of rows and a maximal independent set of columns of A.     

Permutations and successions

Let π = (π(1), π(2),…, π(n)) be a permutation on {1, 2, …, n}. A succession (respectively, ¹-succession) in π is any pair π(i), π(i + 1), where π(i + 1) = π(i) + 1 (respectively, π(i + 1) ≡ π(i) + 1 (mod n)), i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1. Let R(n, k) (respectively, $\text{R}{}^1\text{(n, k)}$) be the number of permutations with k successions (respectively, ¹-successions). In this note we determine R(n, k) and $\text{R}{}^1\text{(n, k)}$. In addition, these notions are generalized to the case of circular permutations, where analogous results are developed.     

Some improvements in Neuberger's iteration procedure for solving partial differential equations

If m and n are positive integers then let S(m, n) denote the linear space over R whose elements are the real-valued symmetric n-linear functions on E_m with operations defined in the usual way. If $\text{U}$ is a function from some sphere S in E_m to R then let $\text{U}$⁽ⁱ⁾(x) denote the ith Frechet derivative of $\text{U}$ at x. In general $\text{U}$⁽ⁱ⁾(x)∈S(m,i). In the paper “An Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations” [Advances in Math. 19 (1976), 245–265] Neuberger presents an iterative procedure for solving a partial differential equation of the form

$\text{AU}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=F(x, U(x), U′(x),…,U}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(x))}$

, where k > n, $\text{U}$ is the unknown from some sphere in E_m to R, A is a linear functional on S(m, n), and F is analytic. The defect in the theory presented there was that in order to prove that the iterates converged to a solution $\text{U}$ the condition $\text{k ?}\text{n}\text{2}$ was needed. In this paper an iteration procedure that is a slight variation on Neuberger's procedure is considered. Although the condition $\text{k ?}\text{n}\text{2}$ cannot as yet be eliminated, it is shown that in a broad class of cases depending upon the nature of the functional A the restriction $\text{k ?}\text{n}\text{2}$ may be replaced by the restriction $\text{k ?}\text{3n}\text{4}$.     

More bounds for elgenvalues using traces

Let the n × n complex matrix A have complex eigenvalues λ₁,λ₂,…λ_n. Upper and lower bounds for Σ(Reλ_i)² are obtained, extending similar bounds for Σ|λ_i|² obtained by Eberlein (1965), Henrici (1962), and Kress, de Vries, and Wegmann (1974). These bounds involve the traces of A¹A, B², C², and D², where $\text{B}\text{=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{A}\text{+}\text{A}{}^1\text{)}$, $\text{C}\text{=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{A}\text{?}\text{A}{}^1\text{) /i}$, and $\text{D}\text{=}\text{AA}{}^1\text{?}\text{A}{}^1\text{A}$, and strengthen some of the results in our earlier paper “Bounds for eigenvalues using traces” in Linear Algebra and Appl. [12].     

Abelian fibrations on S[n]

Let $\text{S}\text{→}\text{φ}\text{P}{}^1$ be an elliptic fibration on a K3 surface S. Then the composition $\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{[n]}}\text{→}\text{π}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{→}\text{sym}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{φ}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ gives an Abelian fibration on S^[n]. Let E be the exceptional divisor of π, then symⁿφ°π(E) is of dimension n?1. We prove the inverse in this Note. To cite this article: B. Fu, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

On the length of optimal TSP circuits in sets of bounded diameter

Let V be a set of n points in R^k. Let d(V) denote the diameter of V, and l(V) denote the length of the shortest circuit which passes through all the points of V. (Such a circuit is an “optimal TSP circuit”.) l^k(n) are the extremal values of l(V) defined by l^k(n)=max{l(V)|V∈V_n^k}, where V_n^k={V|V?R^k,|V|=n, d(V)=1}. A set V∈V_n^k is “longest” if l(V)=l^k(n). In this paper, first some geometrical properties of longest sets in R² are studied which are used to obtain l²(n) for small n′s, and then asymptotic bounds on l^k(n) are derived. Let δ(V) denote the minimal distance between a pair of points in V, and let: δ^k(n)=max{δ(V)|V∈V_n^k}. It is easily observed that $\text{δ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)=O(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{)}$. Hence, $\text{c}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{lim sup}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{δ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}$ exists. It is shown that for all $\text{n, c}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{≤δ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)}$, and hence, for all $\text{n, l}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)≥ c}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}$. For k=2, this implies that $\text{l}{}^2\text{(n)≥(}\text{π}{}^2\text{12}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>4</mtext>}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, which generalizes an observation of Fejes-Toth that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{l}{}^2\text{(n)n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{≥(}\text{π}{}^2\text{12}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>4</mtext>}}$. It is also shown that $\text{l}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n) ≤ [}\text{(3?√3)k}\text{(k?1)}\text{]nδ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n) + o(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{) ≤ [}\text{(3?√3)k}\text{(k?1)}\text{]n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{+ o(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{)}$. The above upper bound is used to improve related results on longest sets in k-dimensional unit cubes obtained by Few (Mathematika2 (1955), 141–144) for almost all k′s. For k=2, Few's technique is used to show that $\text{l}{}^2\text{(n)≤(}\text{πn}\text{2}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{+ O(1)}$.     

Generalized Bell numbers and zeros of successive derivatives of an entire function

Six different formulations equivalent to the statement that, for n ? 2, the sum ∑_{k = 1}ⁿ (?1)^kS(n, k) ≠ 0, where the S(n, k) are Stirling numbers of the second kind, are shown to hold. Using number-theoretic methods, a sufficient condition for the above statement to be true for a set of positive integers n having density 1 is then obtained. It remains open whether it is true for all n > 2. The equivalent statements then yield information on the irreducibility of the polynomials ∑_{k = 1}ⁿS(n, k)t^{k = 1} over the rationals, the nonreal zeros for successive derivatives $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dz}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{exp}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{iz}}\text{)}$, a gap theorem for the nonzero coefficients of exp(?e^z), and the continuous solution of the differential-difference equation $\text{?(x) = 1, 0 ? x < 1, ?′(x) = ?¦x¦?(x ? 1), 1 ? x < ∞}$, where ∥ denotes the greatest integer function.     

Some diophantine relations involving circular functions of rational angles

The eigenvalues of the 3 off-diagonal matrices of rank n with elements $\text{1}\text{+i}\text{cot}\text{[(j?k)}\text{π}\text{n}\text{],}\text{sin}{}^{-2}\text{[(j?k)}\text{π}\text{n}\text{]}$and $\text{sin}{}^{-4}\text{[(j?k)}\text{π}\text{n}\text{] (j=}\text{1,2,…,}\text{n,k=}\text{1,2,…,}\text{n,j≠k)}$, are computed. The sums over k from 1 to n?1 of $\text{cot(}\text{kπ}\text{n}\text{)sin(}\text{2skπ}\text{n}\text{)}$ and$\text{sin}{}^{\mathrm{-p}}\text{(}\text{kπ}\text{n}\text{)cos(}\text{2skπ}\text{n}\text{)}$ are moreover computed for s integer and p=2 and 4. The results are given by simple formulae in terms of integers.     

Inequalities concerning numbers of subsets of a finite set

Let S(n) denote the set of subsets of an n-element set. For an element x of S(n), let Γx and Px denote, respectively, all (|x| ?1)-element subsets of x and all (|x| + 1)-element supersets of x in S(n). Several inequalities involving Γ and P are given. As an application, an algorithm for finding an x-element antichain $\text{X}{}^1$ in S(n) satisfying $\text{| YX}{}^1\text{| ? | YX |}$ for all x-element antichains X in S(n) is developed, where YX is the set of all elements of S(n) contained in an element of X. This extends a result of Kleitman [9] who solved the problem in case x is a binomial coefficient.     

Elementary proof of the transformation formula for Lambert series involving generalized Dedekind sums

An elementary proof is given of the author's transformation formula for the Lambert series $\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(x) =}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n?1}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\infty </mtext>}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?p}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(1?x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ relating G_p(e^2πiτ) to G_p(e^2πiAτ), where p > 1 is an odd integer and $\text{Aτ =}\text{(aτ + b)}\text{(cτ + d)}$ is a general modular substitution. The method extends Sczech's argument for treating Dedekind's function $\text{log}\text{η(τ) =}\text{πiτ}\text{12}\text{? G}{}_1\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi i\tau }}\text{)}$, and uses Carlitz's formula expressing generalized Dedekind sums in terms of Eulerian functions.     

Deterministic version of Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of matrix eigenvalues

It is proved that Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of eigenvalues of random matrices, which is important in the statistical theory of energy levels of heavy nuclei, possesses the following completely deterministic version. Let A_n=(a_ij), 1?i, ?n, be the nth section of an infinite Hermitian matrix, {λ⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n its eigenvalues, and {u_k⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n the corresponding (orthonormalized column) eigenvectors. Let $\text{v}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=(a}{}_{\mathrm{n1}}\text{,a}{}_{\mathrm{n2}}\text{,?,a}{}_{\mathrm{n,n?1}}\text{)}$, put

$\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)=[n(n-1)]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>-1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{[(n-1)t]}\text{|v}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{f}}{}^{\mathrm{(n-1)}}\text{|}{}^2\text{,}\text{0?t?1}$

(bookeeping function for the length of the projections of the new row v¹_n of A_n onto the eigenvectors of the preceding matrix A_n?1), and let finally

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=n}{}^{-1}\text{(}\text{number of}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{?x}\text{n}\text{,1?k?n)}$

(empirical distribution function of the eigenvalues of $\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{n}$. Suppose (i) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{nn}}\text{n}\text{=0}$, (ii) lim_nX_n(t)=Ct(0<C<∞,0?t?1). Then

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?W(·,C)}\text{(n→∞)}$

,where W is absolutely continuous with (semicircle) density

$\text{w(x,C)=}\text{(2Cπ)}{}^{-1}\text{(4C-x}{}^2{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}\text{0}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}$

     

Geometry of the numerical range of matrices

Some techniques for the study of the algebraic curve C(A) which generates the numerical range W(A) of an n×n matrix A as its convex hull are developed. These enable one to give an explicit point equation of C(A) and a formula for the curvature of C(A) at a boundary point of W(A). Applied to the case of a nonnegative matrix A, a simple relation is found between the curvature of the function Φ(A)=p((1?α)A+ αA^T) (pbeingthePerronroot) at $\text{α=}\text{1}\text{2}$ and the curvature of W(A) at the Perron root of $\text{1}\text{2}\text{(A+A}{}^{\mathrm{T}}\text{)}$. A connection with 2-dimensional pencils of Hermitian matrices is mentioned and a conjecture formulated.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

The asymptotic distribution of lattice points in hyperbolic space

Suppose x and y are two points in the upper half-plane H⁺, and suppose Γ is a discontinuous group of conformal automorphisms of H⁺ having compact fundamental domain S. Denote by N_T(x, y) the number of points of the form γy (γ?Γ) in the closed disc of hyperbolic radius T centered about x, and set $\text{Q}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{(x, y) = N}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{(x, y) ?}\text{V(T)}\text{A}\text{,}\text{where}\text{V(T)}$ is the hyperbolic area of the disc, and A is the hyperbolic area of S. The asymptotic behavior of the quantity ?_LxL(Q_T(x,y))² is estimated in terms of small eigenvalues of the Laplacian on functions automorphic under Γ.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Function algebra invariants and the conformal structure of planar domains

Let A(S) be the sup-normed Banach algebra of analytic functions with continuous boundary values on the compact bordered Riemann surface S.For (?) in $\text{A(S)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{exp}\text{(A(S))}$, the colength of (?) is defined by $\text{∥(?)∥ =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{log inf}\text{{∥ g ∥ ∥ g}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∥; g ? (?)}}$. Colength is shown to induce a norm on the cohomology group H¹(S,R) dual to the norm induced on the homology group H₁(S,R) by harmonic length, or, equivalently, dual to the norm on Re A(S)^⊥.The existence and uniqueness of extremal functions for the colength functional is demonstrated. The aforementioned norms are shown to determine the conformal structure of S (up to reflection) and to be related to the mapping properties of S.     

Almost commuting matrices

It is shown that if A and B are n × n complex matrices with $\text{A = A}{}^1\text{and}\text{∥AB ? BA∥</}\text{2?}{}^2\text{(n ? 1)}$, then there exist n × n matrices A′ and B′ with $\text{A′ = A′}{}^1\text{such that}\text{A′B′ = B′A′}\text{and}\text{∥A ? A′∥? ?, ∥B ? B′∥? ?}$.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.