d‐ Versus l‐Glucose Conjugation: Mitochondrial Targeting of a Light‐Activated Dual‐Mode‐of‐Action Ruthenium‐Based Anticancer Prodrug

Light‐activated ruthenium polypyridyl anticancer prodrugs often suffer from poor water solubility, poor selectivity, and/or ill‐defined intracellular targets. Coordination of the d ‐ or l ‐glucose thioether ligand 3 (2‐(2‐(2‐(methylthio)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl‐β‐glucopyranoside) to the highly lipophilic ruthenium complex [Ru(tpy)(dppn)(H₂O)]²⁺ ([ 1 ]²⁺; dppn=benzo[i]dipyrido‐[3,2‐a:2′,3′‐c]phenazine, tpy=2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine) solved all these problems at once. The two enantiomers of [Ru(tpy)(dppn)( 3) ][PF₆]₂, [d ‐ 2 ][PF₆]₂ and [l ‐ 2 ][PF₆]₂, were soluble in water, which allowed the influence of the chirality of the glucose moiety on uptake, toxicity, and intracellular localization of the prodrug to be probed without changing any other physicochemical properties. Both compounds showed mild, but different, cytotoxicity in A549 (human lung carcinoma) and MCF‐7 (human breast adenocarcinoma) cancer cells in the dark, whereas following low doses of visible light irradiation (3.1 J cm^?2 at λ = 454 nm), a similar, but high cytotoxicity (EC₅₀ < 1 μm ), was observed. Irrespective of the chirality, both slightly emissive Ru complexes were found in the mitochondria, and two modes of action may contribute to light‐induced cell death: 1) the glucose thioether ligand is photosubstituted by water, thus [ 1 ]²⁺, which interacts with DNA at an exceptionally high 400:1 base pair/Ru ratio, is released; 2) both [ 1 ]²⁺ and [ 2 ]²⁺ produce massive amounts of singlet oxygen, which leads to very efficient photodynamic DNA cleavage.     

Induced Self‐Assembly of Platinum(II) Alkynyl Complexes through Specific Interactions between Citrate and Guanidinium for Proof‐of‐Principle Detection of Citrate and an Assay of Citrate Lyase

Water‐soluble alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine complexes appended with guanidinium moieties, [Pt(tpy)(C?C?Ar)][OTf]₂ (tpy=terpyridine; OTf=trifluoromethanesulfonate; Ar=C₆H₄‐{NHC(?NH₂⁺)(NH₂)}‐4 ( 1 ), C₆H₄‐{CH₂NHC(?NH₂⁺)(NH₂)}‐4 ( 2 )), and [Pt(tBu₃tpy)(C?CC₆H₄‐{NHC(?NH₂⁺)(NH₂)}‐4)][OTf]₂ ( 3 ; tBu₃tpy=4,4′,4′′‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine), have been synthesized and characterized. The photophysical properties of the complexes have been studied. Based on the results of UV/Vis absorption, resonance light scattering, and dynamic light scattering experiments, in aqueous buffer solutions complexes 1 and 2 undergo aggregation in the presence of citrate through strong and specific electrostatic and hydrogen‐bonding interactions with citrate. The emergence of a triplet metal–metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (³MMLCT) emission in the near‐infrared (NIR) region brought on by the induced self‐assembly of complex 1 has been demonstrated for proof‐of‐principle detection of citrate with good sensitivity and selectivity over other mono‐ and dicarboxylate substrates in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle as well as phosphate and lactate anions. Such a good selectivity toward citrate has been rationalized by the high charge density of citrate under physiological conditions and specific interactions between the guanidinium moiety on complex 1 and citrate. Extension of the work to citrate detection in fetal bovine serum and real‐time monitoring of the activity of citrate lyase by the NIR emission of complex 1 have also been demonstrated.     

Dichloro­(4,4′‐dialkyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′)platinum(II), where alkyl is pentyl and heptyl

Dichloro­(4,4′‐dipentyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′)platinum(II), [PtCl₂(C₂₀H₂₈N₂)], adopts a discrete π–π stacking structure, where the alkyl chains are located in a random manner. In contrast, dichloro­(4,4′‐diheptyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′)platinum(II), [PtCl₂(C₂₄H₃₆N₂)], forms a layer structure comprised of alkyl chain layers and paired coordination sites, as observed for analogous complexes with longer alkyl chains.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Extended Bis(terpyridine)ruthenium Amino Acids

(Oligopyridine)ruthenium(II) complexes have been widely used in dye sensitized solar cells and other sophisticated optical devices due to their outstanding photophysical properties and their chemical stability. Herein, we describe the longitudinal extension of our previously reported bis(terpyridine)ruthenium(II) amino acid [Ru(tpy–NH₂)(tpy–COOH)]²⁺ (tpy = 4′‐substituted 2,2′:6′,2″‐terpyridine) by insertion of para‐phenylene spacers –C₆H₄– between the terpyridine and the functional groups. The influence of the para‐phenylene spacer on the absorption and emission properties is investigated using UV/Vis absorption and emission spectroscopy and is discussed within a qualitative molecular orbital picture.     

Oligodeoxynucleotide Duplexes Containing (5′S)‐5′‐C‐Alkyl‐Modified 2′‐Deoxynucleosides: Can an Alkyl Zipper across the DNA Minor‐Groove Enhance Duplex Stability?

A series of oligonucleotides containing (5′S)‐5′‐C‐butyl‐ and (5′S)‐5′‐C‐isopentyl‐substituted 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides were designed, prepared, and characterized with the intention to explore alkyl‐zipper formation between opposing alkyl chains across the minor groove of oligonucleotide duplexes as a means to modulate DNA‐duplex stability. From four possible arrangements of the alkyl groups that differ in the density of packing of the alkyl chains across the minor groove, three (duplex types I – III , Fig. 2) could experimentally be realized and their duplex‐forming properties analyzed by UV‐melting curves, CD spectroscopy, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), as well as by molecular modeling. The results show that all arrangements of alkyl residues within the minor groove of DNA are thermally destabilizing by 1.5–3°/modification in T_m. We found that, within the proposed duplexes with more loosely packed alkyl groups (type‐ III duplexes), accommodation of alkyl residues without extended distorsion of the helical parameters of B‐DNA is possible but does not lead to higher thermodynamic stability. The more densely packed and more unevenly distributed arrangement (type‐ II duplexes) seems to suffer from ecliptic positioning of opposite alkyl groups, which might account for a systematic negative contribution to stability due to steric interactions. The decreased stability in the type‐ III duplexes described here may be due either to missing hydrophobic interactions of the alkyl groups (not bulky enough to make close contacts), or to an overcompensation of favorable alkyl‐zipper formation presumably by loss of structured H₂O in the minor groove.     

Ligand‐to‐Ligand Charge‐Transfer Transitions of Platinum(II) Complexes with Arylacetylide Ligands with Different Chain Lengths: Spectroscopic Characterization,Effect of Molecular Conformations,and Density Functional Theory Calculations

The complexes [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1R}]⁺ (n=1: R=alkyl and aryl (Ar); n=1–3: R=phenyl (Ph) or Ph‐N(CH₃)₂‐4; n=1 and 2, R=Ph‐NH₂‐4; tBu₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) and [Pt(Cl₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=tert‐butyl (tBu), Ph, 9,9’‐dibutylfluorene, 9,9’‐dibutyl‐7‐dimethyl‐amine‐fluorene; Cl₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐trichloro‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) were prepared. The effects of substituent(s) on the terpyridine (tpy) and acetylide ligands and chain length of arylacetylide ligands on the absorption and emission spectra were examined. Resonance Raman (RR) spectra of [Pt(tBu₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=n‐butyl, Ph, and C₆H₄‐OCH₃‐4) obtained in acetonitrile at 298 K reveal that the structural distortion of the C?C bond in the electronic excited state obtained by 502.9 nm excitation is substantially larger than that obtained by 416 nm excitation. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations on [Pt(H₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R= n‐propyl (nPr), 2‐pyridyl (Py)), [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1Ph}]⁺ (n=1–3), and [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺/+H⁺ (n=1–3; H₃tpy=nonsubstituted terpyridine) at two different conformations were performed, namely, with the phenyl rings of the arylacetylide ligands coplanar (“cop”) with and perpendicular (“per”) to the H₃tpy ligand. Combining the experimental data and calculated results, the two lowest energy absorption peak maxima, λ₁ and λ₂, of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl, R=aryl) are attributed to ¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] in the “cop” conformation and mixed ¹[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] transitions in the “per” conformation. The lowest energy absorption peak λ₁ for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐H‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3) shows a redshift with increasing chain length. However, for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C6H4C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3), λ₁ shows a blueshift with increasing chain length n, but shows a redshift after the addition of acid. The emissions of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl) at 524–642 nm measured in dichloromethane at 298 K are assigned to the ³[π(C?CAr)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states and mixed ³[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/³[π(C?C)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states for R=aryl and alkyl groups, respectively. [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1 and 2) are nonemissive, and this is attributed to the small energy gap between the singlet ground state (S₀) and the lowest triplet excited state (T₁).     

catena‐Poly­[bis­[(2,2‐bi­pyridine‐κ2N,N′)­copper(II)]‐μ4‐1,2,4,5‐benzene­tetra­carboxyl­ato‐κ4O1:O2:O3:O4]

In the title complex, [Cu₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂]_n, the Cu^II cation has a four‐coordinated environment, completed by two carboxyl O atoms belonging to two 1,2,4,5‐benzene­tetra­carboxyl­ate anions (TCB⁴⁻) and two N atoms from one 2,2′‐bi­pyridine (2,2′‐bipy) ligand, forming a distorted square‐planar geometry. The [Cu(2,2′‐bipy)]²⁺ moieties are bridged by TCB⁴⁻ anions, which lie about inversion centres, forming an infinite one‐dimensional coordination polymer with a double‐chain structure along the a axis. A two‐dimensional network structure is formed via a face‐to‐face π–π interaction between the 2,2′‐bipy rings belonging to two adjacent double chains, at a distance of approximately 3.56 Å.     

Coordination‐Driven Macrocyclization for Locking of Photo‐ and Thermal cis→trans Isomerization of Azobenzene

Both trans and cis isomers of azobenzene‐linked bis‐terpyridine ligand L1 were incorporated in rigid macrocycles linked by Fe^II(tpy)₂ (tpy: terpyridine) units. The complex of the longer trans‐ L1 is dinuclear [(trans‐ L1 )₂ ? Fe^II₂], whereas the complex of the shorter cis‐ L1 is mononuclear [cis‐ L1? Fe^II]. The complex cis‐ L1? Fe^II was not only thermally stable but also photochemically inactive. These results indicate a perfectly locked state of cis‐azobenzene. The stable macrocyclic structure of cis‐ L1? Fe^II causes locking of the isomerization. To the best of our knowledge, this is first example of dual locking of photo‐ and thermal isomerization of cis‐azobenzene.     

An unusual three‐dimensional chiral threefold polycatenating network self‐assembled from inclined two‐dimensional (4,4) layer motifs

In the coordination compound poly[diaqua(μ₂‐4,4′‐bipyridine)(μ₂‐4‐carboxylatocinnamato)nickel(II)], [Ni(C₁₀H₆O₄)(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, both the 4‐carboxylatocinnamate and 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bpy) ligands act as bidentate bridges, connecting the Ni^II centres in an octahedral coordination geometry into a two‐dimensional (4,4) layer. Each layer polycatenates two other identical layers, thus giving a rare 2D → 3D polycatenating network (2D and 3D are two‐ and three‐dimensional, respectively), with a mutually parallel arrangement of the layers. The chiral 4,4′‐bpy ligands link the Ni^II centres into chiral chains, thus introducing chirality into the layer and the resulting 3D network.     

Interactions between dimers of {1,1′‐[o‐phenylenebis(nitrilomethylidyne)]di‐2‐naphtholato‐κ4O,N,N′,O′}nickel(II)

In the title compound, [Ni(C₂₈H₁₈N₂O₂)], the Ni^II centre has a square‐planar coordination geometry in which the Schiff base ligand acts as a cis‐O,N,N′,O′‐tetradentate ligand. The crystal structure is built up of centrosymmetric dimer units stacked into chains along the [010] direction. Adjacent chains associate via C—H...O hydrogen bonding only, leading to a two‐dimensional sheet‐like structure consisting of layers parallel to (10). The cofacial dimeric complex contains an Ni...Ni contact of 3.291 (4) Å.     

Poly[[diaqua‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐dinitratodi‐μ‐l‐tyrosinato‐dicopper(II)]: a chiral two‐dimensional coordination polymer

The title compound, [Cu₂(C₉H₁₀NO₃)₂(NO₃)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, contains Cu^II atoms and l ‐tyrosinate (l ‐tyr) and 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) ligands in a 2:2:1 ratio. Each Cu atom is coordinated by one amino N atom and two carboxylate O atoms from two l ‐tyr ligands, one N atom from a 4,4′‐bipy ligand, a monodentate nitrate ion and a water molecule in an elongated octahedral geometry. Adjacent Cu atoms are bridged by the bidentate carboxylate groups into a chain. These chains are further linked by the bridging 4,4′‐bipy ligands, forming an undulated chiral two‐dimensional sheet. O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds connect the sheets in the [100] direction. This study offers useful information for the engineering of chiral coordination polymers with amino acids and 4,4′‐bipy ligands by considering the ratios of the metal ion and organic components.     

Chloro(η6‐p‐cymene)(2‐methyl‐5‐oxo‐7‐phenyl‐5,6‐di­hydro‐2H‐1,2,4‐triaz­epine‐3‐thiol­ato‐κ2N4,S)­ruthenium(II)

The novel title ruthenium(II) complex, [RuCl(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₁₀H₁₀N₃OS)], was synthesized from the reaction of 1,2,4‐triazepine, a new class of bidentate ligands, with [Ru(p‐cymene)Cl₂]₂. The 1,2,4‐triazepine ligand is coordinated to the metal centre through the N‐4 and S atoms, forming a four‐membered chelate ring. This is the first structural example of a transition metal complex containing a 1,2,4‐triazepine ligand.     

(Nitro‐κN)[2‐(phenyldiazenyl‐κN2)pyridine‐κN](2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ3N)ruthenium(II) tetrafluoroborate

The Ru—N bond distances in the title complex, [Ru(NO₂)(C₁₁H₉N₃)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]BF₄ or [Ru(NO₂)(tpy)(azpy)]BF₄, [tpy is 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine and azpy is 2‐(phenyl­azo)­pyridine], are Ru—N_py 2.063 (4), Ru—N_azo 2.036 (4), Ru—N_nitro 2.066 (3) Å, and Ru—N_tpy 2.082 (4), 1.982 (3) and 2.074 (4) Å. The azo N atom is trans to the nitro group. The azo N=N bond length is 1.265 (5) Å, which is the shortest found in such complexes to date. This indicates a multiple bond between Ru and the N atom of the nitro group, and π‐­backbonding [dπ(Ru) π*(azo)] is decreased.     

Binuclear and chain‐structure zinc(II) complexes constructed from 3,4‐dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamic acid and N‐donor coligands 4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine

3,4‐Dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamic acid (Dmca) reacts with zinc sulfate in the presence of 4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine (L₁) or 4,4′‐bipyridine (L₂) under hydrothermal conditions to afford two mixed‐ligand coordination complexes, namely tetrakis(μ‐3,4‐dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamato‐κ²O:O′)bis[[4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine]zinc(II)] heptahydrate, [Zn₂(C₁₁H₁₁O₄)₄(C₈H₇N₃)₂]·7H₂O or [Zn₂(Dmca)₄(L₁)₂]·7H₂O, (I), and catena‐poly[[bis(3,4‐dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamato‐κO)zinc(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′], [Zn(C₁₁H₁₁O₄)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)]_n or [Zn(Dmca)₂(L₂)]_n, (II). The Zn^II centres in the two compounds display different coordination polyhedra. In complex (I), the Zn^II cation is five‐coordinated with a pseudo‐square‐pyramidal geometry, while in complex (II) the Zn^II cation sits on a twofold axis and adopts a distorted tetrahedral coordination environment. Complex (I) features a centrosymmetric binuclear paddle‐wheel‐like structure, while complex (II) shows a chain structure. This study emphasizes the significant effect of the coordination mode of both carboxylate‐group and N‐donor coligands on the formation of complex structures.     

A cyanide‐bridged FeII–NdIII bimetallic assembly with a one‐dimensional ladder‐like chain structure

The title complex, catena‐poly[[[(2,2′‐bipyridine‐1κ²N,N′)tris(methanol‐2κO)(nitrato‐2κ²O,O′)‐μ‐cyanido‐1:2C:N‐cyanido‐1κC‐iron(II)neodymium(III)]‐di‐μ‐cyanido‐1:2′C:N;2:1′N:C] methanol solvate], {[Fe^IINd^III(CN)₄(NO₃)(C₁₀H₈N₂)(CH₃OH)₃]·CH₃OH}_n, is made up of ladder‐like one‐dimensional chains oriented along the c axis. Each ladder consists of two strands based on alternating Fe^II and Nd^III centers connected by cyanide bridges. Furthermore, two such parallel chains are connected by additional cyanide cross‐pieces (the `rungs' of the ladder), which likewise connect Fe^II and Nd^III centers, such that each [Fe(CN)₄(bipy)]²⁻ unit (bipy is 2,2′‐bipyridine) coordinates with three Nd^III centers and each Nd^III center connects with three different [Fe(CN)₄(bipy)]²⁻ units. In the complex, the iron(II) cation is six‐coordinated with a distorted octahedral geometry and the neodymium(III) cation is eight‐coordinated with a distorted dodecahedral environment.     

Syntheses and Structural Studies of Several Diynyl‐Ruthenium Complexes and their Adducts with Cyano‐Alkenes

Herein are described some continuing investigations into the reactions of cyano‐alkenes with diynyl‐ruthenium complexes which have resulted in the preparation and characterisation of diynyl‐ruthenium compounds Ru(C≡CC≡CR)(PP)Cp [R = Ph, PP = dppe; R = Fc, PP = dppf; R = CPh=CBr₂, PP = (PPh₃)₂], together with the polycyanobutadienyls Ru{C≡CC[=C(CN)₂]CR=CR′(CN)}(PP)Cp′ [R = Fc, (PP)Cp′ = (dppf)Cp; R = H, SiMe₃, (PP)Cp′ = (dppe)Cp*] formed by [2 + 2]‐cycloaddition of the cyano‐alkenes to the outer C≡C triple bonds and subsequent ring‐opening reactions. Single‐crystal XRD molecular structure determinations of six complexes are reported.     

fac‐Tri­carbonyl(4,4′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine)­tri­phenyl­tin(II)­rhenium(I)

The title organometallic compound, fac‐tri­carbonyl‐2κ³C‐(4,4′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine)‐2κ²N,N′‐tri­phenyl‐1κ³C¹‐tin(II)­rhenium(I)(Sn—Re), [ReSn(C₆H₅)₃(C₁₂H₁₂N₂)(CO)₃], con­tains three unique π–π stacking interactions. The result is an infinite chain of uninterrupted alternating intra‐ and intermolecular offset π–π stacking interactions throughout the crystal lattice. This extended π–π stacking arrangement, and an additional isolated intramolecular π–π interaction between the remaining 4,4′‐di­methyl‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine ring and a second phenyl group, impose geometric constraints on the Re and Sn atoms, yielding distorted octahedral and tetrahedral coordinations, respectively, for the metal centers.     

A twofold interwoven two‐dimensional→two‐dimensional (2‐D→2‐D) cluster–organic network based on the [Cu2I2] cluster and the 4,4′‐(diazenediyl)dipyridine ligand: poly[[μ2‐4,4′‐(diazenediyl)dipyridine]‐μ2‐iodido‐copper(I)]

In the polymeric title compound, [CuI(C₁₀H₈N₄)]_n, the Cu^I atom is in a four‐coordinated tetrahedral geometry, formed by two I atoms and two pyridine N atoms from two different 4,4′‐(diazenediyl)dipyridine (4,4′‐azpy) ligands. Two μ₂‐I atoms link two Cu^I atoms to form a planar rhomboid [Cu₂I₂] cluster located on an inversion centre, where the distance between two Cu^I atoms is 2.7781 (15) Å and the Cu—I bond lengths are 2.6290 (13) and 2.7495 (15) Å. The bridging 4,4′‐azpy ligands connect the [Cu₂I₂] clusters into a two‐dimensional (2‐D) double‐layered grid‐like network [parallel to the (10) plane], with a (4,4)‐connected topology. Two 2‐D grid‐like networks interweave each other by long 4,4′‐azpy bridging ligands to form a dense 2‐D double‐layered network. To the best of our knowledge, this interwoven 2‐D→2‐D network is observed for the first time in [Cu₂I₂]–organic compounds.     

Light Harvesting and Directional Energy Transfer in Long‐Lived Homo‐ and Heterotrimetallic Complexes of FeII,RuII, and OsII

A new family of trimetallic complexes of the form [(bpy)₂M(phen‐Hbzim‐tpy)M′(tpy‐Hbzim‐phen)M(bpy)₂]⁶⁺ (M=Ru^II, Os; M′=Fe^II, Ru^II, Os; bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) derived from heteroditopic phenanthroline–terpyridine bridge 2‐{4‐[2,6‐di(pyridin‐2‐yl) pyridine‐4‐yl]phenyl}‐1H‐imidazole[4,5‐f][1,10]phenanthroline (phen‐Hbzim‐tpy) were prepared and fully characterized. Zn²⁺ was used to prepare mixed‐metal trimetallic complexes in situ by coordinating with the free tpy site of the monometallic precursors. The complexes show intense absorptions throughout the UV/Vis region and also exhibit luminescence at room temperature. The redox behavior of the compounds is characterized by several metal‐centered reversible oxidation and ligand‐centered reduction processes. Steady‐state and time‐resolved luminescence data show that the potentially luminescent Ru^II‐ and Os^II‐based triplet metal‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer (³MLCT) excited states in the triads are quantitatively quenched, most likely by intercomponent energy transfer to the lower lying ³MLCT (for Ru and Os) or triplet metal‐centered (³MC) excited states of the Fe^II subunit (nonluminescent). Interestingly, iron did not adversely affect the photophysics of the respective systems. This suggests that the multicomponent molecular‐wire‐like complexes investigated here can behave as efficient light‐harvesting antennas, because all the light absorbed by the various subunits is efficiently channeled to the subunit(s) in which the lowest‐energy excited states are located.     

A Novel,One‐Pot Four‐Component Route to 2′‐Thioxo‐2′,3′‐dihydrospiro[indole‐3,6′‐[1,3]thiazin]‐2‐one Derivatives

An efficient route to 2′,3′‐dihydro‐2′‐thioxospiro[indole‐3,6′‐[1,3]thiazin]‐2(1H)‐one derivatives is described. It involves the reaction of isatine, 1‐phenyl‐2‐(1,1,1‐triphenyl‐λ⁵‐phosphanylidene)ethan‐1‐one, and different amines in the presence of CS₂ in dry MeOH at reflux (Scheme 1). The alkyl carbamodithioate, which results from the addition of the amine to CS₂, is added to the α,β‐unsaturated ketone, resulting from the reaction between 1‐phenyl‐2‐(1,1,1‐triphenyl‐λ⁵‐phosphanylidene)ethan‐1‐one and isatine, to produce the 3′‐alkyl‐2′,3′‐dihydro‐4′‐phenyl‐2′‐thioxospiro[indole‐3,6′‐[1,3]thiazin]‐2(1H)‐one derivatives in excellent yields (Scheme 2). Their structures were corroborated spectroscopically (IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, and EI‐MS) and by elemental analyses.