Stabilization of a Chiral Dirhodium Carbene by Encapsulation and a Discussion of the Stereochemical Implications

For the first time, the stereochemical course of an asymmetric cyclopropanation can be discussed on the basis of experimental structural information on a pertinent chiral dirhodium carbene intermediate. Key to success was the formation of racemic single crystals of a heterochiral [Rh₂{(S*)‐PTTL}₄{=C(Ar)COOMe}][Rh₂{(R*)‐PTTL}₄] (Ar=MeOC₆H₄; PTTL=N‐phthaloyl‐tert‐leucinate) capsule, which has been characterized by X‐ray diffraction. NMR spectroscopic data confirm that the obtained structural portrait is also relevant in solution and provide additional information about the dynamics of this species. The chiral binding pocket is primarily defined by the conformational preferences of the N‐phthaloyl‐protected amino acid ligands and reinforced by a network of weak interligand interactions that get stronger when chlorinated phthalimide residues are used.     

Reaction of dirhodium(II) tetraacetate with S-methyl-L-cysteine

Abstract

The reaction of antitumor active dirhodium(II) tetraacetate, [Rh₂(AcO)₄], with S-methyl-L-cysteine (HSMC) was studied at the pH of mixing (=4.8) in aqueous media at various temperatures under aerobic conditions. The results from UV–vis spectroscopy and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) showed that HSMC initially coordinates via its sulfur atom to the axial positions of the paddlewheel framework of the dirhodium(II) complex, and was confirmed by the crystal structure of [Rh₂(AcO)₄(HSMC)₂]. After some time (48?h at 25?°C), or at elevated temperature (40?°C), Rh-SMC chelate formation causes breakdown of the paddlewheel structure, generating the mononuclear Rh(III) complexes [Rh(SMC)₂]⁺, [Rh(AcO)(SMC)₂] and [Rh(SMC)₃], as indicated by ESI–MS. These aerobic reaction products of [Rh₂(AcO)₄] with HSMC have been compared with those of the two proteinogenic sulfur-containing amino acids methionine and cysteine. Comparison shows that the (S,N)-chelate ring size influences the stability of the [Rh₂(AcO)₄] paddlewheel cage structure and its Rh^II–Rh^II bond, when an amino acid with a thioether group coordinates to dirhodium(II) tetraacetate.     

Asymmetric Total Synthesis of (−)‐Englerin A through Catalytic Diastereo‐ and Enantioselective Carbonyl Ylide Cycloaddition

An asymmetric total synthesis of the guaiane sesquiterpene (?)‐englerin A, a potent and selective inhibitor of the growth of renal cancer cell lines, was accomplished. The basis of the approach is a highly diastereo‐ and enantioselective carbonyl ylide cycloaddition with an ethyl vinyl ether dipolarophile under catalysis by dirhodium(II) tetrakis[N‐tetrachlorophthaloyl‐(S)‐tert‐leucinate], [Rh₂(S‐TCPTTL)₄], to construct the oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane framework with concomitant introduction of the oxygen substituent at C9 on the exo‐face. Another notable feature of the synthesis is ruthenium tetraoxide‐catalyzed chemoselective oxidative conversion of C9 ethyl ether to C9 acetate.     

Paddlewheel dirhodium complexes bridged by para‐substituted benzoates

The dirhodium complex bis­(benzonitrile)tetra­kis[μ‐4‐(diethyl­amino)benzoato‐κ²O:O′]dirhodium(II)(Rh—Rh) benzonitrile disolvate, [Rh₂(C₁₁H₁₄NO₂)₄(C₇H₅N)₂]·2C₇H₅N, lies about an inversion centre. The dirhodium complex (methanol)tetra­kis(μ‐4‐nitro­benzoato‐κ²O:O′)(pyridine)dirhodium(II)(Rh—Rh) dichloro­methane solvate, [Rh₂(C₇H₄NO₄)₄(C₅H₅N)(CH₄O)]·CH₂Cl₂, lies in a general position in the unit cell, but the complexes dimerize around an inversion centre via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding of the axial MeOH to a carboxyl­ate O atom. In the latter crystal structure, π–π stacking inter­actions between the bridging 4‐nitro­benzoate ligands and the axial pyridine ligand are observed between adjacent mol­ecules.     

Variation of hydrogen‐bonded networks in hexa­fluoro­phosphate salts of amidate‐bridged dirhodium(II,III) complexes with axial aqua ligands

In diaqua­tetra‐μ‐acetamidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐di­rhodium(II,III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Rh₂(C₂H₄NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆, and diaqua­tetra‐μ‐acetamidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐di­rho­dium(II,III)hexa­fluoro­phosphate dihydrate, [Rh₂(C₂H₄NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆·2H₂O, the cations and anions lie on inversion centers. Diaqua­tetra‐μ‐propionamidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐dirhodium(II,III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate dihydrate, [Rh₂(C₃H₆NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆·2H₂O, and diaqua­tetra‐μ‐butyramidato‐κ⁴N:O;κ⁴O:N‐dirhodium(II,III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Rh₂(C₄H₈NO)₄(H₂O)₂]PF₆, crystallize with two crystallographically independent complexes that lie on inversion centers. In all of the structures, the dirhodium units are hydrogen bonded to one another. The hydrogen‐bonded networks vary with the alkyl substituents.     

Selective oxidation of benzylic,allylic and propargylic alcohols using dirhodium(II) tetraamidinate as catalyst and aqueous tert‐butyl hydroperoxide as oxidant

We show that the dirhodium(II) tetraamidinate complex Rh₂(Msip)₄ efficiently catalyzes the oxidation of activated secondary alcohols at only 0.1 mol% loading. In this approach, we oxidized various benzylic, allylic and propargylic alcohols to the corresponding carbonyl compounds under mild aqueous conditions using the inexpensive oxidant T‐HYDRO® (70 wt% aqueous tert‐butyl hydroperoxide). Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Amide‐Functionalized Naphthyridines on a RhII–RhII Platform: Effect of Steric Crowding,Hemilability, and Hydrogen‐Bonding Interactions on the Structural Diversity and Catalytic Activity of Dirhodium(II) Complexes

Ferrocene‐amide‐functionalized 1,8‐naphthyridine (NP) based ligands {[(5,7‐dimethyl‐1,8‐naphthyridin‐2‐yl)amino]carbonyl}ferrocene (L¹H) and {[(3‐phenyl‐1,8‐naphthyridin‐2‐yl)amino]carbonyl}ferrocene (L²H) have been synthesized. Room‐temperature treatment of both the ligands with Rh₂(CH₃COO)₄ produced [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₃(L¹)] ( 1 ) and [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₃(L²)] ( 2 ) as neutral complexes in which the ligands were deprotonated and bound in a tridentate fashion. The steric effect of the ortho‐methyl group in L¹H and the inertness of the bridging carboxylate groups prevented the incorporation of the second ligand on the {Rh^II–Rh^II} unit. The use of the more labile Rh₂(CF₃COO)₄ salt with L¹H produced a cis bis‐adduct [Rh₂(CF₃COO)₄(L¹H)²] ( 3 ), whereas L²H resulted in a trans bis‐adduct [Rh₂(CF₃COO)₃(L²)(L²H)] ( 4 ). Ligand L¹H exhibits chelate binding in 3 and L²H forms a bridge‐chelate mode in 4 . Hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the amide hydrogen and carboxylate oxygen atoms play an important role in the formation of these complexes. In the absence of this hydrogen‐bonding interaction, both ligands bind axially as evident from the X‐ray structure of [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₂(CH₃CN)₄(L²H)₂](BF₄)₂ ( 6 ). However, the axial ligands reorganize at reflux into a bridge‐chelate coordination mode and produce [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₂(CH₃CN)₂(L¹H)](BF₄)₂ ( 5 ) and [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₂(L²H)₂](BF₄)₂ ( 7 ). Judicious selection of the dirhodium(II) precursors, choice of ligand, and adaptation of the correct reaction conditions affords 7 , which features hemilabile amide side arms that occupy sites trans to the Rh–Rh bond. Consequently, this compound exhibits higher catalytic activity for carbene insertion to the C?H bond of substituted indoles by using appropriate diazo compounds, whereas other compounds are far less reactive. Thus, this work demonstrates the utility of steric crowding, hemilability, and hydrogen‐bonding functionalities to govern the structure and catalytic efficacyof dirhodium(II,II) compounds.     

Intramolecular Asymmetric Amidations of Sulfonamides and Sulfamates Catalyzed by Chiral Dirhodium(II) Complexes

Enantioselective intramolecular amidation of aliphatic sulfonamides was achieved for the first time by means of chiral carboxylatodirhodium(II) catalysts in conjunction with PhI(OAc)₂ and MgO in high yields and with enantioselectivities of up to 66% (Scheme 3, Table 1). The best results were obtained with [Rh₂{(S)‐nttl)₄] and [Rh₂{(R)‐ntv)₄] as catalysts ((S)‐nttl=(αS)‐α‐(tert‐butyl)‐1,3‐dioxo‐2H‐benz[de]isoquinoline‐2‐acetato, (R)‐nto=(αR)‐α‐isopropyl‐1,3‐dioxo‐2H‐benz[de] isoquinoline‐2‐acetato). In addition, these carboxylatodirhodium(II) catalysts were also efficient in intramolecular amidations of aliphatic sulfamates esters, although the enantioselectivity of these latter reactions was significantly lower (Scheme 4, Table 3).     

Intramolecular C–H insertion catalyzed by dirhodium(II) complexes using CO2 as the reaction media

Abstract

In this work, the intramolecular C–H insertion of diazoacetamides catalyzed by dirhodium(II) complexes and using CO₂ as solvent is disclosed. The expected lactams were obtained in yields over 97%. The asymmetric intramolecular C–H insertion was also achieved and the β-lactam 14 was obtained in >97% yield and 65% ee using the chiral dirhodium(II) catalyst Rh₂(S-PTTL)₄. Finally, the dirhodium(II) complex Rh₂(OAc)₄ was used in two consecutive cycles in which complete conversion to the lactam was observed.     

Redox Materials by the Covalent Entrapment of Redox‐Active Dirhodium(II,II) Species in a Siloxane Network

Summary: Hydrolysis and polycondensation of the coupling agent (aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APS), axially coordinated to the redox‐active complex [Rh₂(form)₂(CH₃COO)₂(APS)₂], lead to the insertion of redox‐active inorganic microdomains into a siloxane network; the new polymers undergo cyclic redox reactions indicating that dirhodium(II ,II ) centres retain their redox activity even when incorporated into siloxane networks.

The redox‐active complex [Rh₂(form)₂(CH₃COO)₂(APS)₂] (form = N,N′‐di‐p‐tolylformamidinate) incorporated into a siloxane network here.     

Reversal of the Regiochemistry in the Rhodium‐Catalyzed [4+3] Cycloaddition between Vinyldiazoacetates and Dienes

A regio‐, diastereo‐, and enantioselective [4+3] cycloaddition between vinylcarbenes and dienes has been achieved using the dirhodium tetracarboxylate catalyst [Rh₂(S‐BTPCP)₄]. This methodology provides facile access to 1,4‐cycloheptadienes that are regioisomers of those formed from the tandem cyclopropanation/Cope rearrangement reaction of vinylcarbenes with dienes.     

Enantioselective amination of silylketene acetals with (N-arylsulfonylimino)phenyliodinanes catalyzed by chiral dirhodium(II) carboxylates: asymmetric synthesis of phenylglycine derivatives

The first catalytic enantioselective amination of silylketene acetals with (N-arylsulfonylimino)phenyliodinanes is described. The reaction of silylketene acetals derived from methyl phenylacetates with [N-(2-nitrophenylsulfonyl)imino]phenyliodinane (NsN = IPh) under the catalysis of dirhodium(II) tetrakis[N-tetrachlorophthaloyl-(S)-tert-leucinate], Rh₂(S-TCPTTL)₄, proceeds in benzene at room temperature to give N-(2-nitrophenylsulfonyl)phenylglycine derivatives in high yields and with enantioselectivities of up to 99% ee.     

Two isomorphous ZnII/CoII complexes with tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiol and histamine,and (4‐hydroxymethyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN)bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κ2O,S)zinc(II)

The complexes [2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)ethylamine‐κN]bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κS)cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₂H₂₇O₃SSi)₂(C₅H₉N₃)], and [2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)ethylamine‐κN]bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κS)zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₂H₂₇O₃SSi)₂(C₅H₉N₃)], are isomorphous. The central Zn^II/Co^II ions are surrounded by two S atoms from the tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolate ligand and by two N atoms from the chelating histamine ligand in a distorted tetrahedral geometry, with two intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the histamine NH₂ groups and tert‐butoxy O atoms. Molecules of the complexes are joined into dimers via two intermolecular bifurcated N—H...(S,O) hydrogen bonds. The Zn^II atom in [(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl‐κN³)methanol]bis(tri‐tert‐butoxysilanethiolato‐κ²O,S)zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₂H₂₇O₃SSi)₂(C₄H₆N₂O)], is five‐coordinated by two O and two S atoms from the O,S‐chelating silanethiolate ligand and by one N atom from (1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl)methanol; the hydroxy group forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with sulfur. Molecules of this complex pack as zigzag chains linked by N—H...O hydrogen bonds. These structures provide reference details for cysteine‐ and histidine‐ligated metal centers in proteins.     

Bis(dimethyl sulfoxide‐S)tetrakis(μ‐p‐hydroxybenzoato‐O:O′)dirhodium(II)–tetrakis(μ‐butyrato‐O:O′)bis(dimethyl sulfoxide‐S)dirhodium(II) cocrystal ethanol disolvate

The title structure, [Rh₂(C₇H₅O₃)₄(C₂H₆OS)₂]·[Rh₂(C₄H₇­O₂)₄(C₂H₆OS)₂]·2C₂H₆O, contains two discrete neutral Rh–Rh dimers cocrystallized as the ethanol disolvate. Each dimer is situated on an inversion center. The butyrate chain displays disorder in one C‐atom position. In each dimer, the di­methyl sulfoxide ligand (dmso) is bound via S, as expected. The ethanol is a hydrogen‐bond acceptor for one p‐hydroxy­benzoate hydroxyl group and acts as a hydrogen‐bond donor to the dmso O atom of a neighboring p‐hydroxy­benzoate dirhodium complex. A third hydrogen bond is formed from the other p‐hydroxy­benzoate hydroxyl group to the dmso O atom of a butyrate–dirhodium complex.     

Enantio- and diastereoselective cyclopropanation with tert-butyl α-diazopropionate catalyzed by dirhodium(II) tetrakis[N-tetrabromophthaloyl-(S)-tert-leucinate]

The first successful example of a catalytic asymmetric cyclopropanation with α-diazopropionates is described. The cyclopropanation reaction of 1-aryl-substituted and related conjugated alkenes with tert-butyl α-diazopropionate has been achieved by catalysis with dirhodium(II) tetrakis[N-tetrabromophthaloyl-(S)-tert-leucinate], Rh₂(S-TBPTTL)₄, providing the corresponding cyclopropane products containing a quarternary stereogenic center in good to high yields and with high diastereo- and enantioselectivities (trans:cis = 90:10 to >99:1, 81-93% ee).     

Electrochemical oxidative addition of chloride to Rh2(μ-dppm)2(CO)2Cl2

The electrochemical oxidation of trans-Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(CO)₂Cl₂ (dppm = bis (diphenylphosphino)methane) in the presence of chloride has afforded the new dirhodium(II) unsymmetrical complex Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)(CO)Cl₃ which is readily converted to the complex [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Co)(μ-Cl)Cl₂]PF₆. This species has been shown to undergo addition reactions with chloride to regenerate [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)Cl₃(CO)], and with carbon monoxide and t-butylisocyanide to give the additional new dirhodium(II) complexes [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)Cl₂(CO)₂]PF₆ and [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)(CNC(CH₃)₃)₂Cl₂]PF₆, respectively. During prolonged exposure to carbon monoxide [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Co)(μ-Cl)Cl₂]PF₆ undergoes reduction with the loss of chloride to give [Rh₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-Cl)(CO)₂]PF₆.     

Facile Synthesis and Versatile Reactivity of an Unusual Cyclometalated Rhodium(I) Pincer Complex

The synthesis of the reactive PN(C^H) ligand 2‐di(tert‐butylphosphanomethyl)‐6‐phenylpyridine ( 1^H ) and its versatile coordination to a Rh^I center is described. Facile C?H activation occurs in the presence of a (internal) base, thus resulting in the new cyclometalated complex [Rh^I(CO)(κ³‐P,N,C‐ 1 )] ( 3 ), which has been structurally characterized. The resulting tridentate ligand framework was experimentally and computationally shown to display dual‐site proton‐responsive reactivity, including reversible cyclometalation. This feature was probed by selective H/D exchange with [D₁]formic acid. The addition of HBF₄ to 3 leads to rapid net protonolysis of the Rh?C bond to produce [Rh^I(CO)(κ³‐P,N,(C?H)‐ 1 )] ( 4 ). This species features a rare aryl C?H agostic interaction in the solid state, as shown by X‐ray diffraction studies. The nature of this interaction was also studied computationally. Reaction of 3 with methyl iodide results in rapid and selective ortho‐methylation of the phenyl ring, thus generating [Rh^I(CO)(κ²‐P,N‐ 1^Me )] ( 5 ). Variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy indicates the involvement of a Rh^III intermediate through formal oxidative addition to give trans‐[Rh^III(CH₃)(CO)(I)(κ³‐P,N,C‐ 1 )] prior to C?C reductive elimination. The Rh^III–trans‐diiodide complex [Rh^I(CO)(I)₂(κ³‐P,N,C‐ 1 )] ( 6 ) has been structurally characterized as a model compound for this elusive intermediate.     

Design of a Heterogeneous Catalyst Based on Cellulose Nanocrystals for Cyclopropanation: Synthesis and Solid‐State NMR Characterization

Heterogeneous dirhodium(II) catalysts based on environmentally benign and biocompatible cellulose nanocrystals (CNC‐Rh₂) as support material were obtained by ligand exchange between carboxyl groups on the CNC surface and Rh₂(OOCCF₃)₄, as was confirmed by solid‐state ¹⁹F and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. On average, two CF₃COO^? groups are replaced during ligand exchange, which is consistent with quantitative analysis by a combination of ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy and thermogravimetry. CNC‐Rh₂ catalysts performed well in a model cyclopropanation reaction, in spite of the low dirhodium(II) content on the CNC surface (0.23 mmol g^?1). The immobilization through covalent bonding combined with the separate locations of binding positions and active sites of CNC‐Rh₂ guarantees a high stability against leaching and allows the recovery and reuse of the catalyst during the cyclopropanation reaction.     

Catalytic Divergent [3+3]‐ and [3+2]‐Cycloaddition by Discrimination Between Diazo Compounds

Highly selective divergent cycloaddition reactions of enoldiazo compounds and α‐diazocarboximides catalyzed by copper(I) or dirhodium(II) have been developed. With tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate as the catalyst epoxypyrrolo[1,2‐a]azepine derivatives were prepared in good yields and excellent diastereoselectivities through the first reported [3+3]‐cycloaddition of a carbonyl ylide. Use of Rh₂(pfb)₄ or Rh₂(esp)₂ directs the reactants to regioselective [3+2]‐cycloaddition generating cyclopenta[2,3]pyrrolo[2,1‐b]oxazoles with good yields and excellent diastereoselectivities.     

Enantioselectivity and cis/trans-Selectivity in Dirhodium(II)-Catalyzed addition of diazoacetates to olefins

The Rh¹¹-catalyzed carbenoid addition of diazoacetates to olefins was investigated with [Rh₂{(4S)-phox}₄] ( 1 ;phox = tetrakis[(4S)-tetrahydro-4-phenyloxazol-2-one]), [Rh₂{(2S)-mepy}₄] ( 2 ; mepy = tetrakis[methyl (2S)-tetrahydro-5-oxopyrrole-2-carboxylate]), and [Rh₂(OAc)₄] ( 3 ). While catalysis with 2 and 3 afford preferentially trans-cyclopropanecarboxylates, the cis-isomers are the major products with 1 . In general, the enantioselectivities achieved with 1 and 2 are comparable. Additions catalyzed by 1 are strongly sensitive to steric effects. Highly substituted olefins afford cyclopropanes in only poor yield. The preferential cis-selectivity observed in reactions catalyzed by 1 is attributed to dominant interactions between the ligand of the catalyst and the substituents of both olefin and diazoacetate, which overrule the steric interactions between olefin and diazoacetate in the transition state for carbene transfer.