Quermassintegrals of a random polytope in a convex body

Let K be a convex body in \mathbbRⁿ \mathbb{R}^n with volume |K| = 1 |K| = 1 . We choose N 3 n+1 N \geq n+1 points x₁,?, x_N x_1,\ldots, x_N independently and uniformly from K, and write C(x₁,?, x_N) C(x_1,\ldots, x_N) for their convex hull. Let f : \mathbbR⁺ ? \mathbbR⁺ f : \mathbb{R^+} \rightarrow \mathbb{R^+} be a continuous strictly increasing function and 0 ￡ i ￡ n-1 0 \leq i \leq n-1 . Then, the quantity¶¶E (K, N, f °W_i) = ò_K ?ò_K f[W_i(C(x₁, ?, x_N))]dx_N ?dx₁ E (K, N, f \circ W_{i}) = \int\limits_{K} \ldots \int\limits_{K} f[W_{i}(C(x_1, \ldots, x_N))]dx_{N} \ldots dx_1 ¶¶is minimal if K is a ball (W_i is the i-th quermassintegral of a compact convex set). If f is convex and strictly increasing and 1 ￡ i ￡ n-1 1 \leq i \leq n-1 , then the ball is the only extremal body. These two facts generalize a result of H. Groemer on moments of the volume of C(x₁,?, x_N) C(x_1,\ldots, x_N) .     

Wirtinger numbers and holomorphic symplectic immersions

For any subvariety of a compact holomorphic symplectic K?hler manifold, we define the symplectic Wirtinger number W(X). We show that W(X) \leqslant 1,W(X) \leqslant 1, and the equality is reached if and only if the subvariety X ì MX \subset M is trianalytic, i.e. compatible with the hyperk?hler structure on M. For a sequence X₁ ? X₂ ? ?X_n ? MX_1 \to X_2 \to \ldots X_n \to M of immersions of simple holomorphic symplectic manifolds, we show that W( X₁ ) \leqslant W( X₂ ) \leqslant ?\leqslant W( X_n ).W\left( {X_1 } \right) \leqslant W\left( {X_2 } \right) \leqslant \ldots \leqslant W\left( {X_n } \right).     

On conjugacy of some systems of functions

Summary. We investigate the bounded solutions j:[0,1]? X \varphi:[0,1]\to X of the system of functional equations¶¶j(f_k(x))=F_k(j(x)),    k=0,?,n-1,x ? [0,1] \varphi(f_k(x))=F_k(\varphi(x)),\;\;k=0,\ldots,n-1,x\in[0,1] ,(*)¶where X is a complete metric space, f₀,?,f_n-1:[0,1]?[0,1] f_0,\ldots,f_{n-1}:[0,1]\to[0,1] and F₀,...,F_n-1:X? X F_0,...,F_{n-1}:X\to X are continuous functions fulfilling the boundary conditions f₀(0) = 0, f_n-1(1) = 1, f_k+1(0) = f_k(1), F₀(a) = a,F_n-1(b) = b,F_k+1(a) = F_k(b), k = 0,?,n-2 f_{0}(0) = 0, f_{n-1}(1) = 1, f_{k+1}(0) = f_{k}(1), F_{0}(a) = a,F_{n-1}(b) = b,F_{k+1}(a) = F_{k}(b),\,k = 0,\ldots,n-2 , for some a,b ? X a,b\in X . We give assumptions on the functions f_k and F_k which imply the existence, uniqueness and continuity of bounded solutions of the system (*). In the case X = \Bbb C X= \Bbb C we consider some particular systems (*) of which the solutions determine some peculiar curves generating some fractals. If X is a closed interval we give a collection of conditions which imply respectively the existence of homeomorphic solutions, singular solutions and a.e. nondifferentiable solutions of (*).     

Commutator automorphisms of formal power series rings

For a big class of commutative rings , every continuous -automorphism of with the linear part the identity is in the commutator subgroup of . An explicit bound for the number of commutators involved and a -theoretic interpretation of this result are provided.

     

Integration of the lifting formulas and the cyclic homology of the algebras of differential operators

We integrate the Lifting cocycles Y_2n+1, Y_2n+3, Y_2n+5,? ([Sh1,2]) \Psi_{2n+1}, \Psi_{2n+3}, \Psi_{2n+5},\ldots\,([\rm Sh1,2]) on the Lie algebra Dif_n of holomorphic differential operators on an n-dimensional complex vector space to the cocycles on the Lie algebra of holomorphic differential operators on a holomorphic line bundle l \lambda on an n-dimensional complex manifold M in the sense of Gelfand--Fuks cohomology [GF] (more precisely, we integrate the cocycles on the sheaves of the Lie algebras of finite matrices over the corresponding associative algebras). The main result is the following explicit form of the Feigin--Tsygan theorem [FT1]:¶¶ H^·_Lie(\frak g\frak l^fin_￥(Dif_n);\Bbb C) = ù^·(Y_2n+1, Y_2n+3, Y_2n+5,? ) H^\bullet_{\rm Lie}({\frak g}{\frak l}^{\rm fin}_\infty({\rm Dif}_n);{\Bbb C}) = \wedge^\bullet(\Psi_{2n+1}, \Psi_{2n+3}, \Psi_{2n+5},\ldots\,) .     

Representation and Approximation of Positivity Preservers

We consider a closed set S?? ⁿ and a linear operator

$\Phi \colon \mathbb{R}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}[X_1,\ldots,X_n]$

that preserves nonnegative polynomials, in the following sense: if f≥0 on S, then Φ(f)≥0 on S as well. We show that each such operator is given by integration with respect to a measure taking nonnegative functions as its values. This can be seen as a generalization of Haviland’s Theorem, which concerns linear functionals on ?[X ₁,…,X _n ]. For compact sets S we use the result to show that any nonnegativity preserving operator is a pointwise limit of very simple nonnegativity preservers with finite dimensional range.

     

Sharp bounds for the Bernoulli numbers

We determine the best possible real constants a\alpha and b\beta such that the inequalities [(2(2n)!)/((2p)²ⁿ)] [1/(1-2^a-2n)] \leqq |B_2n| \leqq [(2(2n)!)/((2p)²ⁿ)] [1/(1-2^b-2n)]{2(2n)! \over(2\pi)^{2n}} {1 \over 1-2^{\alpha -2n}} \leqq |B_{2n}| \leqq {2(2n)! \over (2\pi )^{2n}}\, {1 \over 1-2^{\beta -2n}}hold for all integers n\geqq 1n\geqq 1. Here, B₂, B₄, B₆,... are Bernoulli numbers.     

Essential norms of some singular integral operators

Let a\alpha and b\beta be bounded measurable functions on the unit circle T. The singular integral operator S_a, bS_{\alpha ,\,\beta } is defined by S_a, b f = aPf + bQf(f ? L² (T))S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } f = \alpha Pf + \beta Qf(f \in L^2 (T)) where P is an analytic projection and Q is a co-analytic projection. In the previous paper, the norm of S_a, bS_{\alpha ,\,\beta } was calculated in general, using a,b\alpha ,\beta and a[`(b)] + H<sup>￥</sup>\alpha \bar {\beta } + H^\infty where H<sup>￥</sup>H^\infty is a Hardy space in L<sup>￥</sup> (T).L^\infty (T). In this paper, the essential norm ||S<sub>a, b</sub> ||<sub>e</sub>\Vert S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } \Vert _e of S<sub>a, b</sub>S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } is calculated in general, using a[`(b)] + H^￥ + C\alpha \bar {\beta } + H^\infty + C where C is a set of all continuous functions on T. Hence if a[`(b)]\alpha \bar {\beta } is in H^￥ + CH^\infty + C then ||S_a, b ||_e = max(||a||_￥ , ||b||_￥ ).\Vert S_{\alpha ,\,\beta } \Vert _e = \max (\Vert \alpha \Vert _\infty , \Vert \beta \Vert _\infty ). This gives a known result when a, b\alpha , \beta are in C.     

Representations of nilpotent Lie algebras

Let (L,[p]) a finite dimensional nilpotent restricted Lie algebra of characteristic p 3 3, c ? L^*p \geq 3, \chi \in L^* a linear form. In this paper we study the representation theory of the reduced universal enveloping algebra u(L,c)u(L,\chi ). It is shown that u(L,c)u(L,\chi ) does not admit blocks of tame representation type. As an application, we prove that the nonregular AR-components of u(L,c)u(L,\chi ) are of types \Bbb Z [A_￥ ]\Bbb Z [A_\infty ] or \Bbb Z [A_n]/(t)\Bbb Z [A_n]/(\tau ).     

Cancellation in primely generated refinement monoids

We prove that any primely generated refinement monoid M has separative cancellation, and even strong separative cancellation provided M has no nonzero idempotents. A form of multiplicative cancellation also holds: na ￡ nb na\leq nb implies a ￡ b a\leq b for a,b ? M a,b \in M and n ? {1,2,3,?} n \in \{1,2,3,\ldots\} . In addition, M is a semilattice in the sense that, given c₁,c₂ ? M c_1,c_2 \in M , there is an element d ? M d \in M such that c₁,c₂ ￡ d c_1,c_2 \leq d and, for all a ? M, c₁,c₂ ￡ a a \in M, c_1,c_2 \leq a implies d ￡ a d \leq a . Finally, we prove that any finitely generated refinement monoid is primely generated; in fact, this holds for any refinement monoid with a set of generators satisfying the descending chain condition.     

A combinatorial condition on a certain variety of groups

Let n be an integer and B_n \mathcal B_n be the variety defined by the law [xⁿ,y][x,yⁿ]^-1 = 1.¶ Let B_n^* \mathcal B_n^* be the class of groups in which for any infinite subsets X, Y there exist x ? X x \in X and y ? Y y \in Y such that [xⁿ,y][x,yⁿ]^-1 = 1. For $ n \in {\pm 2, 3\} $ n \in {\pm 2, 3\} we prove that¶ B_n^* = B_n èF \mathcal B_n^* = \mathcal B_n \cup \mathcal F , F \mathcal F being the class of finite groups. Also for $ n \in {- 3, 4\} $ n \in {- 3, 4\} and an infinite group G which has finitely many elements of order 2 or 3 we prove that G ? B_n^* G \in \mathcal B_n^* if and only if G ? B_n G \in \mathcal B_n .     

Orthogonalities in linear spaces and difference operators

Summary. Quite recently C. Alsina, P. Cruells and M. S. Tomás [2], motivated by F. Suzuki's property of isosceles trapezoids, have proposed the following orthogonality relation in a real normed linear space (X, ||·||) (X, \Vert \cdot \Vert) : two vectors x,y ? X x,y \in X are T-orthogonal whenever¶||z-x ||² + ||z-y ||² = ||z ||² + ||z-(x+y) ||² \Vert z-x \Vert^2 + \Vert z-y \Vert^2 = \Vert z \Vert^2 + \Vert z-(x+y) \Vert^2 ¶for every z ? X z \in X . A natural question arises whether an analogue of T-orthogonality may be defined in any real linear space (without a norm structure). Our proposal reads as follows. Given a functional j \varphi on a real linear space X we say that two vectors x,y ? X x,y \in X are j \varphi -orthogonal (and write x^_jy x\perp_{\varphi}y ) provided that D_x,yj = 0 \Delta_{x,y}\varphi = 0 (D_h1,h2 \Delta_{h_1,h_2} stands here and in the sequel for the superposition D_h1 °D_h2 \Delta_{h_1} \circ \Delta_{h_2} of the usual difference operators).¶We are looking for necessary and/or sufficient conditions upon the functional j \varphi to generate a j \varphi -orthogonality such that the pair X,^_j X,\perp_{\varphi} forms an orthogonality space in the sense of J. Rätz (cf. [6]). Two new characterizations of inner product spaces as well as a generalization of some results obtained in [2] are presented.     

Notes on the nuclearity of random subalgebras of O2{\mathcal {O}_2}

There exists a separable exact C*-algebra A which contains all separable exact C*-algebras as subalgebras, and for each norm-dense measure μ on A and independent μ-distributed random elements x ₁, x ₂, ... we have lim_{n ? ￥}\mathbb P(C^*(x₁,?,x_n) is nuclear)=0{\rm {lim}}_{n \rightarrow \infty}\mathbb {P}(C^*(x_1,\ldots,x_n) \mbox{ is nuclear})=0. Further, there exists a norm-dense non-atomic probability measure μ on the Cuntz algebra O₂{\mathcal {O}_2} such that for an independent sequence x ₁, x ₂, ... of μ-distributed random elements x _i we have lim inf_{n ? ￥}\mathbb P(C^*(x₁,?,x_n) is nuclear)=0{\rm {lim\, inf}}_{n \rightarrow \infty}\mathbb {P}(C^*(x_1,\ldots,x_n) \mbox{ is nuclear})=0. We introduce the notion of the stochastic rank for a unital C*-algebra and prove that the stochastic rank of C([0, 1] ^d ) is d.     

On matrix near-rings

Let R be a right near-ring with identity and M_n(R) be the near-ring of n 2 n matrices over R in the sense of Meldrum and Van der Walt. In this paper, M_n(R) is said to be s\sigma-generated if every n 2 n matrix A over R can be expressed as a sum of elements of X_n(R), where X_n(R)={f_ij^r | 1\leqq i, j\leqq n, r ? R}X_n(R)=\{f_{ij}^r\,|\,1\leqq i, j\leqq n, r\in R\}, is the generating set of M_n(R). We say that R is s\sigma-generated if M_n(R) is s\sigma-generated for every natural number n. The class of s\sigma-generated near-rings contains distributively generated and abstract affine near-rings. It is shown that this class admits homomorphic images. For abelian near-rings R, we prove that the zerosymmetric part of R is a ring, so the class of zerosymmetric abelian s\sigma-generated near-rings coincides with the class of rings. Further, for every n, there is a bijection between the two-sided subgroups of R and those of M_n(R).     

Quasi-duality for the rings of generalized power series *

Let A, B be associative rings with identity, and (S, ≤) a strictly totally ordered commutative monoid which is also artinian. For any bimodule _AM_B , we construct a bimodule _A[[S]]M[S]_B[[S]] and prove that _AM_B defines a quasi-duality if and only if the bimodule _A[[S]]M[S]_B[[S]] defines a quasi-duality. As a corollary, it is shown that if a ring A has a quasi-duality then the ring A[[S]] of generalized power series over A has a quasi-duality.     

Quasi-polynomial functions over bounded distributive lattices

In [6] the authors introduced the notion of quasi-polynomial function as being a mapping f : X ⁿ → X defined and valued on a bounded chain X and which can be factorized as ${f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=p(\varphi(x_1),\ldots,\varphi(x_n))}In [6] the authors introduced the notion of quasi-polynomial function as being a mapping f : X ⁿ → X defined and valued on a bounded chain X and which can be factorized as f(x₁,?,x_n)=p(j(x₁),?,j(x_n)){f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=p(\varphi(x_1),\ldots,\varphi(x_n))} , where p is a polynomial function (i.e., a combination of variables and constants using the chain operations ù{\wedge} and ú{\vee}) and j{\varphi} is an order-preserving map. In the current paper we study this notion in the more general setting where the underlying domain and codomain sets are, possibly different, bounded distributive lattices, and where the inner function is not necessarily order-preserving. These functions appear naturally within the scope of decision making under uncertainty since, as shown in this paper, they subsume overall preference functionals associated with Sugeno integrals whose variables are transformed by a given utility function. To axiomatize the class of quasi-polynomial functions, we propose several generalizations of well-established properties in aggregation theory, as well as show that some of the characterizations given in [6] still hold in this general setting. Moreover, we investigate the so-called transformed polynomial functions (essentially, compositions of unary mappings with polynomial functions) and show that, under certain conditions, they reduce to quasi-polynomial functions.     

How quadratic are the natural numbers?

Abstract. For natural numbers n we inspect all factorizations n = ab of n with a ￡ ba \le b in \Bbb N\Bbb N and denote by n=a_n b_nn=a_n b_n the most quadratic one, i.e. such that b_n - a_nb_n - a_n is minimal. Then the quotient k(n) : = a_n/b_n\kappa (n) := a_n/b_n is a measure for the quadraticity of n. The best general estimate for k(n)\kappa (n) is of course very poor: 1/n ￡ k(n) ￡ 11/n \le \kappa (n)\le 1. But a Theorem of Hall and Tenenbaum [1, p. 29], implies(logn)^-d-e ￡ k(n) ￡ (logn)^-d(\log n)^{-\delta -\varepsilon } \le \kappa (n) \le (\log n)^{-\delta } on average, with d = 1 - (1+log₂  2)/log2=0,08607 ?\delta = 1 - (1+\log _2 \,2)/\log 2=0,08607 \ldots and for every e > 0\varepsilon >0. Hence the natural numbers are fairly quadratic.¶k(n)\kappa (n) characterizes a specific optimal factorization of n. A quadraticity measure, which is more global with respect to the prime factorization of n, is k^*(n): = ?_{1 ￡ a ￡ b, ab=n} a/b\kappa ^*(n):= \textstyle\sum\limits \limits _{1\le a \le b, ab=n} a/b. We show k^*(n) ~ \frac 12\kappa ^*(n) \sim \frac {1}{2} on average, and k^*(n)=W(2^{\frac 12(1-e) log n/log ₂n})\kappa ^*(n)=\Omega (2^{\frac {1}{2}(1-\varepsilon ) {\log}\, n/{\log} _2n})for every e > 0\varepsilon>0.     

Equality of two variable weighted means: reduction to differential equations

Summary. Let F, Y \Phi, \Psi be strictly monotonic continuous functions, F,G be positive functions on an interval I and let n ? \Bbb N \{1} n \in {\Bbb N} \setminus \{1\} . The functional equation¶¶F^-1 ([(?_i=1ⁿF(x_i)F(x_i))/(?_i=1ⁿ F(x_i)]) Y^-1 ([(?_i=1ⁿY(x_i)G(x_i))/(?_i=1ⁿ G(x_i))])  (x₁,?,x_n ? I) \Phi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Phi(x_{i})F(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} F(x_{i}}\right) \Psi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Psi(x_{i})G(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} G(x_{i})}\right)\,\,(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n} \in I) ¶was solved by Bajraktarevi' [3] for a fixed n 3 3 n\ge 3 . Assuming that the functions involved are twice differentiable he proved that the above functional equation holds if and only if¶¶Y(x) = [(aF(x) + b)/(cF(x) + d)],       G(x) = kF(x)(cF(x) + d) \Psi(x) = {a\Phi(x)\,+\,b\over c\Phi(x)\,+\,d},\qquad G(x) = kF(x)(c\Phi(x) + d) ¶where a,b,c,d,k are arbitrary constants with k(c²+d²)(ad-bc) 1 0 k(c^2+d^2)(ad-bc)\ne 0 . Supposing the functional equation for all n = 2,3,... n = 2,3,\dots Aczél and Daróczy [2] obtained the same result without differentiability conditions.¶The case of fixed n = 2 is, as in many similar problems, much more difficult and allows considerably more solutions. Here we assume only that the same functional equation is satisfied for n = 2 and solve it under the supposition that the functions involved are six times differentiable. Our main tool is the deduction of a sixth order differential equation for the function j = F°Y^-1 \varphi = \Phi\circ\Psi^{-1} . We get 32 new families of solutions.     

Simplicial complexes and Macaulay’s inverse systems

Let Δ be a simplicial complex on V = {x ₁, . . . , x _n }, with Stanley–Reisner ideal ${I_{\Delta}\subseteq R=k[x_1,\ldots, x_n]}Let Δ be a simplicial complex on V = {x ₁, . . . , x _n }, with Stanley–Reisner ideal I_D í R=k[x₁,?, x_n]{I_{\Delta}\subseteq R=k[x_1,\ldots, x_n]} . The goal of this paper is to investigate the class of artinian algebras A=A(D,a₁,?,a_n) = R/(I_D,x₁^a₁,?,x_n^a_n){A=A(\Delta,a_1,\ldots,a_n)= R/(I_{\Delta},x_1^{a_1},\ldots,x_n^{a_n})} , where each a _i ≥ 2. By utilizing the technique of Macaulay’s inverse systems, we can explicitly describe the socle of A in terms of Δ. As a consequence, we determine the simplicial complexes, that we will call levelable, for which there exists a tuple (a ₁, . . . , a _n ) such that A(Δ, a ₁, . . . , a _n ) is a level algebra.     

A note on a conjecture of Borwein and Choi

A polynomial P(X) with coefficients {ǃ} of odd degree N - 1 is cyclotomic if and only if¶¶P(X) = ±F_p1 (±X)F_p2(±X^p1) ?F_pr(±X^{p1 p2 ?p_r-1}) P(X) = \pm \Phi_{p1} (\pm X)\Phi_{p2}(\pm X^{p1}) \cdots \Phi_{p_r}(\pm X^{p1 p2 \cdots p_r-1}) ¶where N = p₁ p₂ · · · p_r and the p_i are primes, not necessarily distinct, and where F_p(X) : = (X^p - 1) / (X - 1) \Phi_{p}(X) := (X^{p} - 1) / (X - 1) is the p-th cyclotomic polynomial. This is a conjecture of Borwein and Choi [1]. We prove this conjecture for a class of polynomials of degree N - 1 = 2^r p^l - 1 N - 1 = 2^{r} p^{\ell} - 1 for any odd prime p and for integers r, l\geqq 1 r, \ell \geqq 1 .