Darstellung carboxylatsubstituierter Rhenium-Gold-Metallatetrahedrane Re2(AuPPh3)2(μ-PCy2)(CO)7(η1-OC(R)O) (R = H,Me, CF3, Ph, 3,4-(OMe)2C6H3)

Synthesis of Carboxylate Substituted Rhenium Gold Metallatetrahedranes Re₂(AuPPh₃)₂(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O) (R = H, Me, CF₃, Ph, 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃) The reaction of the in situ prepared salt Li[Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(ax-C(Ph)O)] ( 2 ) with 1,5 equivalents of monocarboxylic acid RCOOH (R = H ( 4 a ), Me ( 4 b ), CF₃ ( 4 c ), Ph ( 4 d ), 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃ ( 4 e ) in tetrahydrofruan (THF) solution at 60 °C gives within 4 h under release of benzaldehyde (PhCHO) the η¹-carboxylate substituted dirhenium salt Li[Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O)] (R = H ( 4 a ), Me ( 4 b ), CF₃ ( 4 c ), Ph ( 4 d ), 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃ ( 4 e )) in almost quantitative yield. The lower the pK_a value of the respective carboxylic acid the faster the reaction proceeds. It was only in the case of CF₃COOH possible to prove the formation of the hydroxycarbene complex Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(=C(Ph)OH) ( 5 ) prior to elimination of PhCHO. The new compounds 4 a–4 e were only characterized by ³¹P NMR and ν(CO) IR spectroscopy as they are only stable in solution. They are converted with two equivalents of BF₄AuPPh₃ at 0 °C in a so-called cluster expansion reaction into the heterometallic metallatetrahedrane complexes Re₂(AuPPh₃)₂(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O) (R = H ( 7 a ), Me ( 7 b ), CF₃ ( 7 c ), Ph ( 7 d ), 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃ ( 7 e )) (yield 47–71% ). The expected precursor complexes of 7 a–7 e Li[Re₂(AuPPh₃)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O] ( 8 ) were not detected by NMR and IR spectroscopy in the course of the reaction. Their existence was retrosynthetically proved by the reaction of 7 b with an excess of the chelating base TBD (1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-en) forming [(TBD)_xAuPPh₃][Re₂(AuPPh₃)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(Me)O] ( 8 b ) in solution. The η¹-bound carboxylate ligand in 7 a–7 e can photochemically be converted into a μ-bound ligand in Re₂(AuPPh₃)₂(μ-PCy₂)(μ-OC(R)O)(CO)₆ (R = H ( 9 a ), Me ( 9 b ), CF₃ ( 9 c ), Ph ( 9 d ), 3.4-(MeO)₂C₆H₃ ( 9 e )) under release of one equivalent CO. All isolated cluster complexes were characterized and identified by the following analytical methods: elementary analysis, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy, ν(CO) IR spectroscopy and in the case of 7 d and 9 b by X-ray structure analysis.     

Addition of primary phosphines to the unsaturated triosmium cluster [(μ-H)Os3(CO)8{Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4}]: Synthesis of triosmium clusters bearing dppm, phosphide and phosphinidene ligands via P-H bond activation

Treatment of the electronically unsaturated cluster [(μ-H)Os₃(CO)₈{Ph₂PCH₂P(Ph)C₆H₄}] (1) with primary phosphines PPhH₂ and PCyH₂ gives the phosphido bridged compounds [(μ-H)Os₃(CO)₈(μ-PPhH)(μ-dppm)] (2) and [(μ-H)Os₃(CO)₈(μ-PCyH)(μ-dppm)] (3), respectively, by P-H bond activation of the phosphines and demetallation of the phenyl ring of the diphosphine ligand. Thermolysis of 2 and 3 in refluxing octane at 128 °C results in the formation of the phosphinidene compounds [(μ-H)₂Os₃(CO)₇(μ₃-PPh)(μ-dppm)] (4) and [(μ-H)₂Os₃(CO)₇(μ₃-PCy)(μ-dppm)] (5), respectively, by further P-H bond cleavage of the phosphido groups. All the compounds have been characterized by infrared, ¹H NMR, ³¹P{¹H} NMR and mass spectroscopic data together with single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies for 4. Compound 4 consists of a triangular cluster of osmium atoms with a symmetrically capped phosphinidene ligand and a bridging dppm ligand.     

A stable binuclear complex containing PdHPd bonds

The preparations of the binuclear hydrido-bridged cations [(terdentate ligand)Pd(μ-H)Pd(terdentate ligand)]⁺ from [(terdentate ligand)Pd(acetone)]⁺ and NaO₂CH and [(terdentate ligand)Pd(μ-H)Pt(terdentate ligand)]⁺ from [(terdentate ligand)Pd(acetone)]⁺ and [(terdentate ligand)PtH] (terdentate ligand = 2,6-(Ph₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃) are reported. The preparation of the cation [(terdentate ligand)Pt(μ-H)Pt(terdentate ligand)]⁺ is also reported.     

Synthesis and characterization of η<Superscript>3</Superscript>-allyl palladium(II) complexes with Ph<Subscript>2</Subscript>P(S)CHP(S)Ph<Subscript>2</Subscript> and OC(CF<Subscript>3</Subscript>)CHCO(C<Subscript>4</Subscript>H<Subscript>3</Subscript>S) co-ligands

The new complexes [(η³-Me₂CCMeCH₂)Pd{η²-Ph₂P(S)CHP(S)Ph₂] (1), [(η³-Me₂CCMeCH₂)Pd{η²-OC(CF₃) CHCO(C₄H₃S)}] (2) and [(η³-CH₂CMeCH₂)Pd{η²-OC(CF₃)CHCO(C₄H₃S)}] (3) have been synthesized by reacting [(η³-allyl)Pd(μ-Cl)]₂ with Ph₂P(S)CH₂P(S)Ph₂ and OC(CF₃)CH₂CO(C₄H₃S) in the presence of base. All have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR, ¹H-n.m.r and FAB-mass spectroscopy. Spectroscopic studies suggest that both ligands are bidentate, forming six-membered Pd-S-P-C-P-S and Pd-O-C-C-C-O palladacycles, the η³-allyl group completing the coordination sphere.     

tert‐Butyl(tert‐butoxy)zinc Hydroxides: Hybrid Models for Single‐Source Precursors of ZnO Nanocrystals

Alkylzinc alkoxides, [RZnOR′]₄, have received much attention as efficient precursors of ZnO nanocrystals (NCs), and their “Zn₄O₄” heterocubane core has been regarded as a “preorganized ZnO”. A comprehensive investigation of the synthesis and characterization of a new family of tert‐butyl(tert‐butoxy)zinc hydroxides, [(tBu)₄Zn₄(μ₃‐OtBu)_x(μ₃‐OH)_4?x], as model single‐source precursors of ZnO NCs is reported. The direct reaction between well‐defined [tBuZnOH]₆ ( 1₆ ) and [tBuZnOtBu]₄ ( 2₄ ) in various molar ratios allows the isolation of new mixed cubane aggregates as crystalline solids in a high yield: [(tBu)₄Zn₄(μ₃‐OtBu)₃(μ₃‐OH)] ( 3 ), [(tBu)₄Zn₄(μ₃‐OtBu)₂(μ₃‐OH)₂] ( 4 ), [(tBu)₄Zn₄(μ₃‐OtBu)(μ₃‐OH)₃] ( 5 ). The resulting products were characterized in solution by ¹H NMR and IR spectroscopy, and in the solid state by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The thermal transformations of 2 – 5 were monitored by in situ variable‐temperature powder X‐ray diffraction and thermogravimetric measurements. The investigation showed that the Zn?OH groups appeared to be a desirable feature for the solid‐state synthesis of ZnO NCs that significantly decreased the decomposition temperature of crystalline precursors 3 – 5 .     

Gallium(III) halide complexes with phosphines,arsines and phosphine oxides – a comparative study

The phosphine oxide complexes [GaX₃(Me₃PO)] and [(GaX₃)₂{μ-o-C₆H₄(CH₂P(O)Ph₂)₂}] have been prepared and characterised by microanalysis, IR and multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C{¹H}, ³¹P{¹H} and ⁷¹Ga) spectroscopy. The structures of [GaCl₃(Me₃PO)], [(GaBr₃)₂{μ-o-C₆H₄(CH₂P(O)Ph₂)₂}] and of the ionic product [GaI₂(Me₃PO)₂][GaI₄] have been determined and show that the Lewis acidity of the gallium halides towards phosphinoyl ligands diminishes as the halogen becomes heavier. The [GaX₃(Ph₃E)] (X = Cl, Br or I; E = P or As) and [(GaX₃)₂{μ-o-C₆H₄(CH₂PPh₂)₂}] (X = Br or I) have been prepared and their structural and spectroscopic properties compared with those of the phosphinoyl complexes. The results, and competitive solution NMR studies, show that Ga(III) binds the hard R₃PO in preference to the softer phosphine or arsine ligands. Hydrolysis of gallium(III) phosphines is shown to lead to [R₃PH][GaX₄], but in contrast to some other p-block halides, GaX₃ do not promote air-oxidation of R₃P to R₃PO.     

New Heteronuclear Bridged Borylene Complexes That Were Derived from [{Cp*CoCl}2] and Mono‐Metal?Carbonyl Fragments

The synthesis, structural characterization, and reactivity of new bridged borylene complexes are reported. The reaction of [{Cp*CoCl}₂] with LiBH₄ ? THF at ?70 °C, followed by treatment with [M(CO)₃(MeCN)₃] (M=W, Mo, and Cr) under mild conditions, yielded heteronuclear triply bridged borylene complexes, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)M(CO)₅] ( 1 – 3 ; 1 : M=W, 2 : M=Mo, 3 : M=Cr). During the syntheses of complexes 1 – 3 , capped‐octahedral cluster [(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐H)(BH)₄{Co(CO)₂}] ( 4 ) was also isolated in good yield. Complexes 1 – 3 are isoelectronic and isostructural to [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 5 ) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CO){Mn(CO)₃}] ( 6 ), with a trigonal‐pyramidal geometry in which the μ₃‐BH ligand occupies the apical vertex. To test the reactivity of these borylene complexes towards bis‐phosphine ligands, the room‐temperature photolysis of complexes 1 – 3 , 5 , 6 , and [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)Fe(CO)₃}₂(μ‐CO)] ( 7 ) was carried out. Most of these complexes led to decomposition, although photolysis of complex 7 with [Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂] (n=1–3) yielded complexes 9 – 11 , [3,4‐(Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)‐closo‐1,2,3,4‐Ru₂Fe₂(BH)₂] ( 9 : n=1, 10 : n=2, 11 : n=3). Quantum‐chemical calculations by using DFT methods were carried out on compounds 1 – 3 and 9 – 11 and showed reasonable agreement with the experimentally obtained structural parameters, that is, large HOMO–LUMO gaps, in accordance with the high stabilities of these complexes, and NMR chemical shifts that accurately reflected the experimentally observed resonances. All of the new compounds were characterized in solution by using mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy and their structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of complexes 1 , 2 , 4 , 9 , and 10 .     

Synthesis and structural characterization of iron–sulfur complexes with hydrophilic nitrogen–phosphorus ligands

Reaction of the parent complex (μ-PDT)Fe₂-(CO)₆ (A) (PDT = 1,3-SCH₂CH₂CH₂S^2?) with the bidentate N/P ligand [(Ph₂P)₂N(C₆H₄Cl-p)] in the presence of Me₃NO as decarbonylating agent produced an unexpected iron–sulfur complex [(μ-PDT)Fe₂(CO)₅{PPh₂(NHC₆H₄Cl-1,4)}] (1). Extending this chemistry further, two similar complexes [(μ-PDT)Fe₂(CO)₅{PPh₂(NHC₆H₄NO₂-1,4)}] (2) and [(μ-PDT)Fe₂(CO)₅{PPh₂(NHC₆H₄CO₂Et-1,4)}] (3) could be prepared from the simple substitution reactions of the precursor A with the monodentate N/P ligands Ph₂P(NHC₆H₄NO₂-1,4) and Ph₂P(NHC₆H₄CO₂Et-1,4), respectively. These new complexes, which can be considered as active site models of [FeFe] hydrogenases, have been characterized by elemental analysis, FTIR, and NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P) spectroscopies, as well as by X-ray crystallography for complex 1.     

2-(2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzoyl)benzoic acid derivatives of Group 4 metal alkoxides

Continued exploration of the coordination behavior of derivatives of 2-benzophenone-based ligands with metal alkoxides ([M(OR)₄]) was undertaken from the reaction of 2-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzoyl)benzoic acid (H₂-OBzA) with a series of Group 4 precursors. The products of these reactions were identified as: [(OR)₂Ti(μ-(c,c-OBzA))]₂ (OR?=?OCHMe₂ (OPrⁱ; 1 ?2tol); OCMe₃ (OBu^t; 2 ?THF); OCH₂CMe₃ (ONep; 3)), [[(OPrⁱ)₃Ti(μ-OPrⁱ)Ti(OPrⁱ)₂]₂(μ-(μ_c,μ-OBzA))₂]₂ (4), [(ONep)₃Zr(μ-ONep)₂Zr(ONep)₂]₂(μ-(c,μ-OBzA)₂) (5 ?tol), [(py)(OBu^t)₃Zr]₂(μ-(c,c-OBzA)) (6), [(OBu^t)₂Hf(μ-OBu^t)]₂(μ-(c,η¹-OBzA)) (7) where ‘c’?=?chelating or η²; ‘μ’?=?bridging or η¹,η¹(O,O’); and μ_c?=?bridging chelating or η¹,η¹(O,O’); η^2?:?η¹. The metal centers for each of these compounds adopt a pseudo-octahedral geometry employing the OBzA ligand in numerous binding modes. The different functional oxygens (carboxylate, hydroxyl, and carbonyl) were employed in a variety of coordination modes for 1–7. The complexity of these OBzA-modified compounds is driven by a combination of the coordination behavior of the OBzA moieties, the size of the metal cation, and the pendant chain of the OR ligand. Solution NMR indicates a complex structure exists in solution that was considered to be consistent with the solid-state structure.     

Preparation, X-ray structure, copolymerization with styrene of [(μ-H)Os3(μ-OCNMe2)(CO)9{P(CH2CHCH2)Ph2}] and catalytic properties of the cluster/styrene copolymer

The complex [(μ-H)Os₃(μ-OCNMe₂)(CO)₉{P(CH₂CHCH₂)Ph₂}] derived from the replacement of a lightly-stabilizing NMe₃ ligand in [(μ-H)Os₃(μ-OCNMe₂)(CO)₉(NMe₃)] by allyldiphenylphosphine molecule was physico-chemically and X-ray structurally characterized and served further as a metal cluster monomer to be immobilized on a polymer surface. The copolymerization of this cluster monomer with styrene was studied. It was found that the cluster molecule, when copolymerized, maintains its integrity and the overall structure. The cluster copolymers obtained have been tested as catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation and cyclohexenol hydroxylation reactions.     

Synthesis and structures of (3-methyl-2-pyridyl)diphenylphosphane derivatives of metal clusters

An unsymmetric bidentate ligand (3-methyl-2-pyridyl)diphenylphosphane (P(Mepy)Ph₂) is able to react with various tetranuclear transition metal clusters such as HRuCo₃(CO)₁₂, HRuRh₃(CO)₁₂ and Rh₄(CO)₁₂. The synthesis and crystal structures of HRuCo₃(CO)₁₀(P(Mepy)Ph₂) (1), HRuRh₃(CO)₁₀(P(Mepy)Ph₂) (2), RuRh₂(CO)₉(P(Mepy)Ph) (3) and Rh₆(CO)₁₄(P(Mepy)Ph₂) (4) are described. In 1, 2 and 4 the phosphane ligand replaces the carbonyls and acts as a bridging bidentate P-N group. The formation of 3 includes degradation of both the metal cluster core and the ligand itself. One of the P-C bonds in the ligand is cleaved and the ligand caps a metal triangle with a bridging phosphido group together with the nitrogen donor. The reaction between dinuclear Rh₂(CO)₄Cl₂ and P(Mepy)Ph₂ gives a binuclear Rh₂(μ-CO)Cl₂(P(Mepy)Ph₂)₂ (5) with bridging ligands in a head-to-tail arrangement. The crystal structure is also given.     

Photochemically promoted regiospecific P–C bond cleavage in the diruthenium compound Ru2(CO)2(bmf): X-ray diffraction structure of Ru2(CO)6[μ-C=C(PPh2)C(O)OCH(OMe)](μ-PPh2)

The ruthenium cluster Ru₃(CO)₁₂ reacts with the diphosphine ligand 3,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)-5-methoxy-2(5H)-furanone (bmf) in refluxing toluene to furnish the donor–acceptor compound Ru₂(CO)₂(bmf) as a 1?:?1 mixture of diastereomers. Photolysis of Ru₂(CO)₂(bmf) using 366?nm light leads to the oxidative cleavage of a P–C bond and formation of the phosphido-bridged complex Ru₂(CO)₆[μ-C=C(PPh₂)C(O)OCH(OMe)](μ-PPh₂). The regioselective Ph₂P–C(furanone ring) bond activation attendant upon optical excitation is traced to the phosphine group that was β to the furanone carbonyl group, as established by X-ray analysis of one of the diastereomers of Ru₂(CO)₆[μ-C=C(PPh₂)C(O)OCH(OMe)](μ-PPh₂). Both diruthenium products have been fully characterized in solution by IR and NMR (¹H and ³¹P) spectroscopies and elemental analyses. The observed regioselectivity associated with the P–C bond activation in Ru₂(CO)₂(bmf) is discussed with respect to the chemistry of other bmf-substituted compounds prepared by our groups.     

Anion‐Controlled Switching of an X Ligand into a Z Ligand: Coordination Non‐innocence of a Stiboranyl Ligand

The tetravalent platinum stiboranyl complex [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₂(o‐C₆Cl₄O₂)Sb]PtCl₂Ph ( 2 ) has been synthesized by reaction of [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₂SbClPh]PtCl ( 1 ) with o‐chloranil. In the presence of fluoride anions, the stiboranyl moiety of 2 displays non‐innocent behavior and is readily converted into a fluorostiborane unit. This transformation, which is accompanied by elimination of a chloride ligand from the Pt center, results in the formation of [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₂(o‐C₆Cl₄O₂)SbF]PtClPh ( 3 ). Structural, spectroscopic, and computational studies show that the conversion of 2 into 3 is accompanied by a cleavage of the covalent Pt? Sb bond present in 2 and formation of a longer and weaker Pt→Sb interaction in 3 . These results show that this new Pt–Sb platform supports the fluoride‐induced metamorphosis of a stiboranyl X ligand into a stiborane Z ligand.     

Synthesis and spectroscopic properties of selenolato- and tellurolato-bridged dimolybdenum(MoMo) complexes [(η5-MeCp)Mo(CO)(μ-EPh)]2 (E = Se,Te)

UV irradiation of the diphenylchalcogenides Ph₂Se₂ or Ph₂Te₂ in the presence of [(η⁵-MeCp)Mo(CO)₃]₂ induces rapid reaction to give the double μ-EPh bridged compounds [(η⁵-MeCp)Mo(CO)₂(μ-EPh)]₂. Subsequent decarbonylation by mild thermolysis in vacuo gives [(η⁵-MeCp)Mo(CO)(μ-SePh)]₂ or [(η⁵-MeCp)Mo(CO)(μ-TePh)₂ in good yields. The new compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, infrared and mass spectra. The mixed Se/ Te bridged complex [(η⁵-MeCp)Mo₂(Co)₄(μ-SePh)(μ-TePh)] was not obtained by UV irradiation of [(η⁵-MeCp)Mo(CO)₃]₂ in the presence of a mixture of Ph₂Se₂ and Ph₂Te₂.     

Cyclopentadienyl Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Bridging Alkynylphosphine Ligands: Synthesis and Electrochemical Studies

The reaction of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl) and [CpRuCl(dppe)] (dppe=Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) with bis‐ and tris‐phosphine ligands 1,4‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₂C₆H₄ ( 1 ) and 1,3,5‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₃C₆H₃ ( 2 ), prepared by Ni‐catalysed cross‐coupling reactions between terminal alkynes and diphenylchlorophosphine, has been investigated. Using metal‐directed self‐assembly methodologies, two linear bimetallic complexes, [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₂(μ‐dppab)] ( 3 ) and [{CpRu(dppe)}₂(μ‐dppab)](PF₆)₂ ( 4 ), and the mononuclear complex [CpRuCl(PPh₃)(η¹‐dppab)] ( 6 ), which contains a “dangling arm” ligand, were prepared (dppab=1,4‐bis[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene). Moreover, by using the triphosphine 1,3,5‐tris[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene (tppab), the trimetallic [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₃(μ₃‐tppab)] ( 5 ) species was synthesised, which is the first example of a chiral‐at‐ruthenium complex containing three different stereogenic centres. Besides these open‐chain complexes, the neutral cyclic species [{CpRuCl(μ‐dppab)}₂] ( 7 ) was also obtained under different experimental conditions. The coordination chemistry of such systems towards supramolecular assemblies was tested by reaction of the bimetallic precursor 3 with additional equivalents of ligand 2 . Two rigid macrocycles based on cis coordination of dppab to [CpRu(PPh₃)] were obtained, that is, the dinuclear complex [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₂](PF₆)₂ ( 8 ) and the tetranuclear square [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₄](PF₆)₄ ( 9 ). The solid‐state structures of 7 and 8 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis and show a different arrangement of the two parallel dppab ligands. All compounds were characterised by various methods including ESIMS, electrochemistry and by X‐band ESR spectroscopy in the case of the electrogenerated paramagnetic species.     

Syntheses and molecular structures of organo-tellurium(IV) halides trans-[(Ph2Te)(μ-Cl)2]n,cis-[(Ph2Te)(μ-Cl)2]n, [(p-MeC6H4)2TeBr2], and [{(p-MeC6H4)2TeBr}2(μ-O)]

Abstract

Treatment of Ph₂Te with aqueous hydrogen chloride under air in refluxing THF gave trans-[(Ph₂Te)(μ-Cl)₂]_n (1), whereas interaction of Ph₂Te with ammonium chloride under similar condition afforded cis-[(Ph₂Te)(μ-Cl)₂]_n (2). Reaction of (p-MeC₆H₄)₂Te and bromine in refluxing THF resulted in formation of a discrete complex [(p-MeC₆H₄)₂TeBr₂] (3) with a step-like tetrameric structure, which further reacted with sodium hydroxide in refluxing THF to give a dinuclear tellurium oxide [{(p-Me-C₆H₄)₂TeBr}₂(μ-O)] (4) with a bridging oxygen atom. Complexes 1–4 have been spectroscopically characterized and their crystal structures have been established by X-ray crystallography.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)4(μ‐PCy2)2(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)(μ3‐S){μ3‐η2‐CSC(S)S}]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)(μ₃‐S){μ₃‐η²‐CSC(S)S}] [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐H)₃(μ‐PCy₂)₃(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts with CS₂ at room temperature and yields the open 50 valence electron cluster [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)(μ₃‐S){μ₃‐η²‐CSC(S)S}] ( 3 ) containing the unusual μ₃‐η²‐C₂S₃ mercaptocarbyne ligand. Compound 3 was characterized by single crystal X‐ray structure analysis.     

New Tetracobalt Cluster Compounds for Electrocatalytic Proton Reduction: Syntheses,Structures, and Reactivity

Reaction of Co₂(CO)₈ and 1,3‐propanedithiol in a 1:1 molar ratio in toluene affords a novel tetracobalt complex, [(μ₂‐pdt)₂(μ₃‐S)Co₄(CO)₆] (pdt=‐SCH₂CH₂CH₂S‐, 1 ), which possesses some of the structural features of the active site of [FeFe]‐hydrogenase. Carbonyl displacement reaction of complex 1 in the presence of mono‐ or diphosphine ligands leads to the formation of [(μ₂‐pdt)₂(μ₃‐S)Co₄(CO)₅(PCy₃)] ( 2 ) and [(μ₂‐pdt)₂(μ₃‐S)Co₄(CO)₄(L)] [L=Ph₂PCH?CHPPh₂, 3 ; Ph₂PCH₂N(Ph)CH₂PPh₂, 4 ; Ph₂PCH₂N(iPr)CH₂PPh₂, 5 ]. Complexes 1 – 5 have been fully characterized by spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. Cyclic voltammetry has revealed that complexes 1 – 5 show a reversible first reduction wave and are active for electrocatalytic proton reduction in the presence of CF₃COOH. Protonation reactions have been monitored by ³¹P and ¹H NMR and infrared spectroscopies, which revealed the formation of different protonated species. The mono‐reduced species of 1 – 5 have been spectroscopically characterized by EPR and spectro‐electro‐infrared techniques.     

Nitridorhenium(V) Complexes with 1,3,4‐Triphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐ylidene

[ReNCl₂(PPh₃)₂] and [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] react with the N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) 1,3,4‐triphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐ylidene (HL^Ph) under formation of the stable rhenium(V) nitrido complex [ReNCl(HL^Ph)(L^Ph)], which contains one of the two NHC ligands with an additional orthometallation. The rhenium atom in the product is five‐coordinate with a distorted square‐pyramidal coordination sphere. The position trans to the nitrido ligand is blocked by one phenyl ring of the monodentate HL^Ph ligand. The Re–C(carbene) bond lengths of 2.072(6) and 2.074(6) Å are comparably long and indicate mainly σ‐bonding between the NHC ligand and the electron deficient d² metal atom. The chloro ligand in [ReNCl(HL^Ph)(L^Ph)] is labile and can be replaced by ligands such as pseudohalides or monoanionic thiolates such as diphenyldithiophosphinate (Ph₂PS₂^?) or pyridine‐2‐thiolate (pyS^?). X‐ray structure analyses of [ReN(CN)(HL^Ph)(L^Ph)] and [ReN(pyS)(HL^Ph)(L^Ph)] show that the bonding situation of the NHC ligands (Re–C(carbene) distances between 2.086(3) and 2.130(3) Å) in the product is not significantly influenced by the ligand exchange. The potentially bidentate pyS^? ligand is solely coordinated via its thiolato functionality. Hydrogen atoms of each one of the phenyl rings come close to the unoccupied sixth coordination positions of the rhenium atoms in the solid state structures of all complexes. Re–H distances between 2.620 and 2.712Å do not allow to discuss bonding, but with respect to the strong trans labilising influence of “N^3?”, weak interactions are indicated.     

Redox and Anion Exchange Chemistry of a Stibine–Nickel Complex: Writing the L,X, Z Ligand Alphabet with a Single Element

According to the covalent bond classification (CBC) method, two‐electron donors are defined as L‐type ligands, one‐electron donors as X‐type ligands, and two‐electron acceptors as Z‐type ligands. These three ligand functions are usually associated to the nature of the ligating atom, with phosphine, alkyl, and borane groups being prototypical examples of L‐, X‐ and Z‐ligands, respectively. A new SbNi platform is reported in which the ligating Sb atom can assume all three CBC ligand functions. Using both experimental and computational data, it is shown that PhICl₂ oxidation of (o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃SbNi(PPh₃) ( 1 ) into [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃ClSb]NiCl ( 2 ) is accompanied by a conversion of the stibine L‐type ligand of 1 into a stiboranyl X‐type ligand in 2 . Furthermore, the reaction of 2 with the catecholate dianion in the presence of cyclohexyl isocyanide results in the formation of [(o‐(Ph₂P)C₆H₄)₃(o‐O₂C₆H₄Sb)]Ni(CNCy) ( 4 ), a complex featuring a nickel atom coordinated by a Lewis acidic, Z‐type, stiborane ligand.