Stabilization of a Discrete Lanthanide(II) Hydrido Complex by a Bulky Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate Ligand

Divalent and solvent-free : the ytterbium hydrido complex 1 was obtained by the hydrogenolysis of [(Tp^tBu,Me)Yb(CH₂SiMe₃)(thf)]. The steric demand of the bulky hydrotris(3-tert-butyl-5-methylpyrazolyl)borate ligand, Tp^tBu,Me, is sufficient to stabilize the dimer, yet facile room-temperature reactions with amines, alkynes, diynes, and CO indicate a rich chemistry of 1 .     

Enhancing the Value of Free Metals in the Synthesis of Lanthanoid Formamidinates: Is a Co‐oxidant Needed?

Treatment of N,N′‐bis(aryl)formamidines (ArFormH), N,N′‐bis(2,6‐difluorophenyl)formamidine (DFFormH) or N,N′‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)formamidine (DippFormH), with europium metal in CH₃CN is an efficient synthesis of the divalent complexes: [{Eu(DFForm)₂(CH₃CN)₂}₂] ( Eu1 ) or [Eu(DippForm)₂(CH₃CN)₄] ( Eu2 ). The synthetic method was extended to ytterbium, but the metal required activation by addition of Hg⁰. With DFFormH in CH₃CN, [{Yb(DFForm)₂(CH₃CN)}₂] ( Yb1 ) was obtained in good yield, and [Yb(DFForm)₂(thf)₃] ( Yb3 ) was obtained from a synthesis in CH₃CN/THF. Thus, this synthetic method completely circumvents the use of either salt metathesis, or redox transmetallation/protolysis (RTP) protocols to prepare divalent rare‐earth formamidinates. Heating Yb1 in PhMe/C₆D₆ resulted in decomposition to trivalent products, including one from a CH₃CN activation process. For a synthetic comparison, divalent ytterbium DFForm and DippForm complexes were synthesised by RTP reactions between Yb⁰, Hg(R)₂ (R=Ph, C₆F₅), and ArFormH in THF, leading to the isolation of either [Yb(DFForm)₂(thf)₃] ( Yb3 ), or the first five coordinate rare‐earth formamidinate complex [Yb(DippForm)₂(thf)] ( Yb4 b ), and, from adjustment of the stoichiometry, trivalent [Yb(DFForm)₃(thf)] ( Yb6 ). Oxidation of Yb3 with benzophenone (bp), or halogenating agents (TiCl₄(thf)₂, Ph₃CCl, C₂Cl₆) gave [Yb(DFForm)₃(bp)] or [Yb(DFForm)₂Cl(thf)₂], respectively. Furthermore, the structural chemistry of divalent ArForm complexes has been substantially broadened. Not only have the highest and lowest coordination numbers for divalent rare‐earth ArForm complexes been achieved in Eu2 and Yb4 b , respectively, but also dimeric Eu1 and Yb1 have highly unusual ArForm bridging coordination modes, either perpendicular μ‐1κ(N:N′):2κ(N:N′) in Eu1 , or the twisted μ‐1κ(N:N′):2κ(N′:F′) DFForm coordination in Yb1 , both unprecedented in divalent rare‐earth ArForm chemistry and in the wider divalent rare‐earth amidinate field.     

Lanthanide(II) Complexes of the Dihydrotriazinido Ligand [N{C(Ph)=N}2C(tBu)Ph]−

The potassium dihydrotriazinide K(L^Ph,tBu) ( 1 ) was obtained by a metal exchange route from [Li(L^Ph,tBu)(THF)₃] and KOtBu (L^Ph,tBu = [N{C(Ph)=N}₂C(tBu)Ph]). Reaction of 1 with 1 or 0.5 equivalents of SmI₂(thf)₂ yielded the monosubstituted Sm^II complex [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)I(THF)₄] ( 2 ) or the disubstituted [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Attempted synthesis of a heteroleptic Sm^II amido‐alkyl complex by the reaction of 2 with KCH₂Ph produced compound 3 due to ligand redistribution. The Yb^II bis(dihydrotriazinide) [Yb(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 4 ) was isolated from the 1:1 reaction of YbI₂(THF)₂ and 1 . Molecular structures of the crystalline compounds 2 , 3· 2C₆H₆ and 4· PhMe were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Dinuclear Rare‐Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes Supported by Indolyl Ligands in μ‐η2:η1:η1 Hapticities and their High Catalytic Activity for Isoprene 1,4‐cis‐Polymerization

Two series of new dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes supported by indolyl ligands in novel μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ hapticities are synthesized and characterized. Treatment of [RE(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of 3‐(tBuN?CH)C₈H₅NH ( L₁ ) in THF gives the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH(CH₂SiMe₃)}Ind)RE(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (Ind=indolyl, RE=Y, Dy, or Yb) in good yields. In the process, the indole unit of L₁ is deprotonated by the metal alkyl species and the imino C?N group is transferred to the amido group by alkyl CH₂SiMe₃ insertion, affording a new dianionic ligand that bridges two metal alkyl units in μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ bonding modes, forming the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes. When L₁ is reduced to 3‐(tBuNHCH₂)C₈H₅NH ( L₂ ), the reaction of [Yb(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of L₂ in THF, interestingly, generated the trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (major) and cis‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (minor) complexes. The catalytic activities of these dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes for isoprene polymerization were investigated; the yttrium and dysprosium complexes exhibited high catalytic activities and high regio‐ and stereoselectivities for isoprene 1,4‐cis‐polymerization.     

Synthesis,Structures and Reactivity of Lanthanoid(II) Formamidinates of Varying Steric Bulk

New reactive, divalent lanthanoid formamidinates [Yb(Form)₂(thf)₂] (Form=[RNCHNR]; R=o‐MeC₆H₄ (o‐TolForm; 1 ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ (XylForm; 2 ), 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂ (MesForm; 3 ), 2,6‐Et₂C₆H₃ (EtForm; 4 ), o‐PhC₆H₄ (o‐PhPhForm; 5 ), 2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ (DippForm; 6 ), o‐HC₆F₄ (TFForm; 7 )) and [Eu(DippForm)₂(thf)₂] ( 8 ) have been prepared by redox transmetallation/protolysis reactions between an excess of a lanthanoid metal, Hg(C₆F₅)₂ and the corresponding formamidine (HForm). X‐ray crystal structures of 2 – 6 and 8 show them to be monomeric with six‐coordinate lanthanoid atoms, chelating N,N′‐Form ligands and cis‐thf donors. However, [Yb(TFForm)₂(thf)₂] ( 7 ) crystallizes from THF as [Yb(TFForm)₂(thf)₃] ( 7 a ), in which ytterbium is seven coordinate and the thf ligands are “pseudo‐meridional”. Representative complexes undergo C? X (X=F, Cl, Br) activation reactions with perfluorodecalin, hexachloroethane or 1,2‐dichloroethane, and 1‐bromo‐2,3,4,5‐tetrafluorobenzene, giving [Yb(EtForm)₂F]₂ ( 9) , [Yb(o‐PhPhForm)₂F]₂ ( 10) , [Yb(o‐PhPhForm)₂Cl(thf)₂] ( 11) , [Yb(DippForm)₂Cl(thf)] ( 12) and [Yb(DippForm)₂Br(thf)] ( 16) . X‐ray crystallography has shown 9 to be a six‐coordinate, fluoride‐bridged dimer, 12 and 16 to be six‐coordinate monomers with the halide and thf ligands cis to each other, and 11 to have a seven‐coordinate Yb atom with “pseudo‐meridional” unidentate ligands and thf donors cis to each other. The analogous terbium compound [Tb(DippForm)₂Cl(thf)₂] ( 13 ), prepared by metathesis, has a similar structure to 11 . C? Br activation also accompanies the redox transmetallation/protolysis reactions between La, Nd or Yb metals, Hg(2‐BrC₆F₄)₂, and HDippForm, yielding [Ln(DippForm)₂Br(thf)] complexes (Ln=La ( 14 ), Nd ( 15 ), Yb ( 16 )).     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Several Ytterbium Bis(trimethylsilyl)amides Including Base‐free [Yb{N(SiMe3)2}2(μ‐Cl)]2 — A Coordinatively Unsaturated Complex with Additional Agostic Yb···(H3C—Si) Interactions

The reaction of YbCl₃ with two equivalents of NaN‐(SiMe₃)₂ has afforded a mixture of several ytterbium bis(trimethylsilyl) amides with the known complexes [Yb{N(SiMe₃)₂}2(μ‐Cl)(thf)]₂ ( 1 ) and [Yb{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃]( 4 ) as the main products and the cluster compound [Yb₃Cl₄O{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃(thf)₃]( 2 ) as a minor product. Treatment of 1 and 2 with hot n‐heptane gave the basefree complex [Yb{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂(μ‐Cl)]₂ ( 3 ) in small yield. The structures of compounds 1—4 and the related peroxo complex [Yb₂{N(SiMe₃)₂}₄(μ‐O₂)(thf)₂]( 5 ) have been investigated by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. In the solid‐state, 3 shows chlorobridged dimers with terminal amido ligands (av. Yb—Cl = 262.3 pm, av. Yb—N = 214.4 pm). Additional agostic interactions are observed from the ytterbium atoms to four methyl carbon atoms of the bis(trimethylsilyl)amido groups (Yb···C = 284—320 pm). DFT calculations have been performed on suitable model systems ([Yb₂(NH₂)₄(μ‐Cl)₂(OMe₂)₂]( 1m ), [Yb₂(NH₂)₄(μ‐Cl)₂]( 3m ), [Yb‐(NH₂)₃]( 4m ), [Yb₂(NH2₄(μ‐O₂)(OMe₂)₂]( 5m ), [Yb{N‐(SiMe₃)₂}₂Cl] ( 3m/2 ) and Ln(NH₂)₂NHSiMe₃ (Ln = Yb ( 6m ), Y ( 7m )) in order to rationalize the different experimentally observed Yb—N distances, to support the assignment of the O—O stretching vibration (775 cm ^‐1) in the Raman spectrum of complex 5 and to examine the nature of the agostic‐type interactions in σ‐donorfree 3 .     

Thiomethylmagnesium Chlorides: Synthesis via Hg–Mg Transmetallation and Crystallization of a Grignard Compound as 1/1 Adduct of [Mg(CH2SPh)2(thf)3] and [MgCl2(thf)4]

Thiomethylmercury chlorides 2 Hg(CH₂SMe)Cl · HgCl₂ and Hg(CH₂SPh)Cl react with magnesium in thf to give the Grignard compounds Mg(CH₂SR)Cl (R = Me ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 )) in nearly quantitative yields. From thf/n‐hexane solutions of 2 precipitate at –40 °C colorless crystals of the composition Mg(CH₂SPh)Cl · 3.5 thf ( 2 ′). X‐ray structure determination revealed, that the unit cell contains separated molecules of [Mg(CH₂SPh)₂(thf)₃] and [MgCl₂(thf)₄]. In the [Mg(CH₂SPh)₂(thf)₃] molecules magnesium is distorted trigonal‐bipyramidally coordinate. Two PhSCH₂ and one thf ligand occupy the equatorial positions and two further thf ligands the apical ones. In the [MgCl₂(thf)₄] molecules Mg displays an octahedral coordination with chloro ligands in mutual trans position. Temperature dependent NMR measurements of 2 reveal that in thf the Schlenk equilibrium operates; the composition of the equilibrium mixture at room temperature was estimated to be 89% Mg(CH₂SPh)Cl and 11% Mg(CH₂SPh)₂.     

Synthese und Strukturbestimmung von (tBuP)4Sn(CH3)2 und (CH3)2Sn[(tBu)P?P(tBu)]2Sn(CH3)2

Synthesis and Structure Analysis of (tBuP)₄Sn(CH₃)₂ and (CH₃)₂Sn[(tBu)P? P(tBu)]₂Sn(CH₃)₂ The diphosphides K₂[(tBu)P? (tBuP)₂? P(tBu)] 7 or K₂[(tBu)P? P(tBu)] 8 react with (CH₃)₂SnCl₂ in a molar ratio of 1 : 1 to form the binary 5-membered ring system P₄Sn 4 a and the 6-membered ring system Sn(P₂)₂Sn 5 a respectively. When (CH₃)₂SnCl₂, however, is treated with 8 in a molar ratio of 2 : 1 the 4-membered ring system P₃Sn 2 a is formed which includes the fragmentation of the intermediate K₂[(CH₃)₂Sn ((tBu)P? P(tBu))₂] 9. 4 a and 5 a could be obtained in a pure form and characterized NMR spectroscopically and by X-ray structure analyses; 2 a was identified only NMR spectroscopically.     

Amidoliganden zum Aufbau von mehrkernigen Lanthanoidkomplexen

Amido Ligands for the Synthesis of Polynuclear Lanthanoid Complexes By 1 : 1 reaction of LnBr₃ with NaNHPh in THF the Rare-Earth Complexes [Ln₂Br₄(μ₂-NHPh)₂(thf)₅] (Ln = Sm ( 1 ), Ln = Gd ( 2 )) with two bridging anilido ligands are obtained. In the system LnBr₃/NaNHPh/(Me₂SiO)₃ the tetranuclear compounds [Ln₄(μ₄-O)(NHPh)₃(OSiMe₂NPh)₆Na₅(thf)₇] · THF (Ln = Gd ( 3 ), Ln = Yb ( 4 )) can be built up. They have a central μ₄-oxygene atom in the Ln₄-tetrahedron. It has an oxa-dimethylsilyl-N-phenylamido ligand over all edges and an anilido ligand on three vertexes. By this reaction small amount of [Na₄(thf)₆Yb₂(OSiMe₂NPhSiMe₂O)₂(OSiMe₂NPh)₂(NHPh)₂] ( 5 ) with a O- and N-bridged Yb–Na polyhedron and N-phenyl-bis(dimethylsilanolato)-ligands coordinating μ₂-η² with its oxygen atoms are obtained. Reaction of Lanthanideshalides with LiNH^tBu leads to dimeric complexes. The formation of bridging oxasilylamido ligands is also observed. The compound [Li₂Ln(OSiMe₂N^tBu)₂(HN^tBu)(thf)]₂ (Ln=Sm ( 6 ), Gd ( 7 ) and Yb ( 8 )) contains now an O- and N-bridged Ln–Li polyhedron. (Crystal Data of 1–8 see ‘‘Inhaltsverzeichnis”︁”︁).     

Surprisingly Different Reaction Behavior of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Bis(trimethylsilyl)amides toward Bulky N‐(2‐Pyridylethyl)‐N′‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)pivalamidine

N‐(2,6‐Diisopropylphenyl)‐N′‐(2‐pyridylethyl)pivalamidine (Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)‐C₂H₄‐Py) ( 1 ), reacts with metalation reagents of lithium, magnesium, calcium, and strontium to give the corresponding pivalamidinates [(tmeda)Li{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}] ( 6 ), [Mg{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}₂] ( 3 ), and heteroleptic [{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ae{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}], with Ae being Ca ( 2 a ) and Sr ( 2 b ). In contrast to this straightforward deprotonation of the amidine units, the reaction of 1 with the bis(trimethylsilyl)amides of sodium or potassium unexpectedly leads to a β‐metalation and an immediate deamidation reaction yielding [(thf)₂Na{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}] ( 4 a ) or [(thf)₂K{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}] ( 4 b ), respectively, as well as 2‐vinylpyridine in both cases. The lithium derivative shows a similar reaction behavior to the alkaline earth metal congeners, underlining the diagonal relationship in the periodic table. Protonation of 4 a or the metathesis reaction of 4 b with CaI₂ in tetrahydrofuran yields N‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)pivalamidine (Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐NH₂) ( 5 ), or [(thf)₄Ca{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}₂] ( 7 ), respectively. The reaction of AN(SiMe₃)₂ (A=Na, K) with less bulky formamidine Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N(H)‐C₂H₄‐Py ( 8 ) leads to deprotonation of the amidine functionality, and [(thf)Na{Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}]₂ ( 9 a ) or [(thf)K{Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}]₂ ( 9 b ), respectively, are isolated as dinuclear complexes. From these experiments it is obvious, that β‐metalation/deamidation of N‐(2‐pyridylethyl)amidines requires bases with soft metal ions and also steric pressure. The isomeric forms of all compounds are verified by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis and are maintained in solution.     

Bis(amido)cyclodiphosph(III)azane Complexes of Yttrium and the Lanthanides

The first cyclodiphosph(III)azane complexes of the rare‐earth elements have been synthesized. Reactions of the lithium salt cis‐[(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂{Li(thf)}₂] with anhydrous yttrium trichloride or the heavier lanthanide trichlorides resulted in the corresponding cyclodiphosph(III)azane complexes [Li(thf)₄][{(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂}LnCl₂] (Ln=Y ( 1 a ), Ho ( 1 b ), Er ( 1 c )). The single‐crystal X‐ray structures showed that compounds 1 a – c consisted of ion pairs composed of a [Li(thf)₄]⁺ cation and a C_2v symmetric [{(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂}LnCl₂]^? anion. By treating cis‐[(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂{Li(thf)}₂] with anhydrous SmCl₃ in THF, the trimetallic complex [{(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂}SmCl₃Li₂(thf)₄] ( 2 ) was obtained. The influence of the ionic radii of the lanthanides can be seen in the single‐crystal X‐ray structure of compound 2 , which forms a six‐membered Cl‐Li‐Cl‐Li‐Cl‐Sm metallacycle. The ring adopts a boat conformation in which one chlorine atom and the samarium atom are displaced from the Cl₂Li₂ least‐square plane. Heating of the metalate complexes in toluene resulted in the extrusion of lithium chloride and the formation of the neutral dimeric metal chloride complexes of the composition [(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂LnCl(thf)]₂ (Ln=Y ( 3 a ), La ( 3 b ) Nd ( 3 c ), Sm ( 3 d )). Furthermore, treating 1 a with KNPh₂ resulted in a lithium metalate complex of the composition [Li(thf)₄][{(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂}Y(NPh₂)₂] ( 4 ). The coordination mode of the {(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂}^2? ligand in 4 is different to that observed in 1 a – c , 2 , and 3 a – d ; instead of a symmetric η² coordination of the ligand, a heterocubane‐type structure is observed in the solid state. The complex [(tBuNP)₂(tBuN)₂NdCl(thf)] ( 3 c ) was used as a Ziegler–Natta catalyst for the polymerization of 1,3‐butadiene to poly‐cis‐1,4‐butadiene. The observed activities of the Ziegler–Natta catalyst strongly depended upon the nature of the cocatalyst; in some case very high turnover rates and a cis selectivity of 93–94 % were observed.     

Alkali Metal Based Triimidosulfite Cages as Versatile Precursors for Single-Molecule Magnets

Based on the potassium [{S(tBuN)₂(tBuNH)}₂K₃(tmeda)-K₃{(HNtBu)(NtBu)₂S}₂] ( 1 ) and sodium precursors [S(tBuN)₃(thf)₃-Na₃SNa₃(thf)₃(NtBu)₃S] ( 2 ), [S(tBuN)₃(thf)₃Na₃{(HNtBu)(NtBu)₂S}] ( 3 ) and [(tmeda)₃S-{Na₃(NtBu)₃S}₂] ( 4 ) the syntheses and magnetic properties of three mixed metal triimidosulfite based alkali-lanthanide-metal-cages [(tBuNH)Dy{K(0.5tmeda)}₂{(NtBu)₃S}₂]_n ( 5 ) and [ClLn{Na(thf)}₂{(NtBu)₃S}₂] with Ln=Dy ( 6 ), Er ( 7 ) are reported. The corresponding potassium ( 1 ) and sodium ( 2 – 4 ) based cages are characterized through XRD and NMR experiments. Preventing lithium chloride co-complexation led to a significant increase of SMM performance to previously reported sulfur-nitrogen ligands. The subsequent Dy^III-complexes 5 and 6 display slow relaxation of magnetization at zero field, with relaxation barriers U=77.0 cm⁻¹ for 5 , 512.9 and 316.3 cm⁻¹ for 6 , respectively. Significantly, the latter complex 6 also exhibits a butterfly-shaped hysteresis up to 7 K.     

Chalcogenide Derivatives of Imidotin Cage Complexes

Reaction of the secocubane [Sn₃(μ₂‐NHtBu)₂(μ₂‐NtBu)(μ₃‐NtBu)] ( 1 ) with dibutylmagnesium produces the heterobimetallic cubane [Sn₃Mg(μ₃‐NtBu)₄] ( 4 ) which forms the monochalcogenide complexes of general formula [ESn₃Mg(μ₃‐NtBu)₄] ( 5 a , E=Se; 5 b , E=Te) upon reaction with elemental chalcogens in THF. By contrast, the reaction of the anionic lithiated cubane [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? with the appropriate quantity of selenium or tellurium leads to the sequential chalcogenation of each of the three Sn^II centres. Pure samples of the mono‐ or dichalcogenides are, however, best obtained by stoichiometric redistribution reactions of [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? and the trichalcogenides [E₃Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? (E=Se, Te). These reactions are conveniently monitored by using ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy. The anion [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? also acts as an effective chalcogen‐transfer reagent in reactions of selenium with the neutral cubane [{Snμ₃‐N(dipp)}₄] ( 8 ) (dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) to give the dimer [(thf)Sn{μ‐N(dipp)}₂Sn(μ‐Se)₂Sn{μ‐N(dipp)}₂Sn(thf)] ( 9 ), a transformation that results in cleavage of the Sn₄N₄ cubane into four‐membered Sn₂N₂ rings. The X‐ray structures of 4 , 5 a , 5 b , [Sn₃Li(thf)(μ₃‐NtBu)₄(μ₃‐Se)(μ₂‐Li)(thf)]₂ ( 6 a ), [TeSn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄][Li(thf)₄] ( 6 b ), [Te₂Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄][Li([12]crown‐4)₂] ( 7 b′′ ) and 9 are presented. The fluxional behaviour of cubic imidotin chalcogenides and the correlation between NMR coupling constants and tin–chalcogen bond lengths are also discussed.     

Multinuclear NMR Spectroscopic Characterization of Vanadium(V) Alkylperoxo Complexes VO(OOtBu)k(OnBu)3-k, where k = 1, 2, 3

Using ⁵¹V, ¹⁷O, ¹³C and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, vanadium(V) alkylperoxo complexes VO(OOtBu)_k(OnBu)_3-k, where k = 1, 2 and 3, were characterized in the reaction of VO(OnBu)₃ with tBuOOH in CH₂Cl₂.     

Cations Controlling the Chiral Assembly of Luminescent Atomically Precise Copper(I) Clusters

Chiral assembly and asymmetric synthesis are critically important for the generation of chiral metal clusters with chiroptical activities. Here, a racemic mixture of [K(CH₃OH)₂(18‐crown‐6)]⁺[Cu₅(S^tBu)₆]^? ( 1?CH₃OH ) in the chiral space group was prepared, in which the chiral red‐emissive anionic [Cu₅(S^tBu)₆]^? cluster was arranged along a twofold screw axis. Interestingly, the release of the coordinated CH₃OH of the cationic units turned the chiral 1?CH₃OH crystal into a mesomeric crystal [K(18‐crown‐6)]⁺[Cu₅(S^tBu)₆]^? ( 1 ), which has a centrosymmetric space group, by adding symmetry elements of glide and mirror planes through both disordered [Cu₅(S^tBu)₆]^? units. The switchable chiral/achiral rearrangement of [Cu₅(S^tBu)₆]^? clusters along with the capture/release of CH₃OH were concomitant with an intense increase/decrease in luminescence. We also used cationic chiral amino alcohols to induce the chiral assembly of a pair of enantiomers, [d /l ‐valinol(18‐crown‐6)]⁺[Cu₅(S^tBu)₆]^? ( d /l ‐Cu_5V ), which display impressive circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) in contrast to the CPL‐silent racemic mixture of 1?CH₃OH and mesomeric 1 .     

The Synthesis of tert‐Butyl(dichloromethyl)bis(trimethylsilyl)silane and (Dibromomethyl)ditert‐butyl(trimethylsilyl)silane and their Reactions with Organolithium Derivatives

tert‐Butyl(dichloromethyl)bis(trimethylsilyl)silane ( 4 ), prepared by the reaction of tert‐butylbis(trimethylsilyl)silane with trichloromethane and potassium tert‐butoxide, reacted with 2,4,6‐triisopropylphenyllithium (TipLi) (molar ratio 1 : 2) at room temperature to give (after hydrolytic workup) the silanol tBu(2,4,6‐iPr₃C₆H₂)Si(OH)–CH(SiMe₃)₂ ( 15 ). The formation of 15 is discussed as proceeding through the indefinitely stable silene tBu(2,4,6‐iPr₃C₆H₂)Si=C(SiMe₃)₂ ( 13 ), but attempts to isolate the compound failed. Treatment of (dibromomethyl)ditert‐butyl(trimethylsilyl)silane ( 7 ), made from tBu₂(Me₃Si)SiH, HCBr₃ and KOtBu, with methyllithium (1 : 3) at –78 °C afforded tBu₂MeSi–CHMeSiMe₃ ( 19 ); 7 and phenyllithium (1 : 3) under similar conditions gave tBu₂PhSi–CH₂SiMe₃ ( 20 ). The reaction paths leading to 15 , 19 and 20 are discussed. Reduction of 7 with lithium in THF produced the substituted ethylene tBu₂(Me₃Si)SiCH=CHSitBu₂SiMe₃ ( 21 ). For 21 the results of an X‐ray structural analysis are given.     

Alcoholysis of Al2(OtBu)6 – Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Al9O3(OEt)21

When Al₂(OtBu)₆ is treated with ethanol, Al₉O₃(OEt)₂₁ ( 1 ) is obtained, which is a missing link in the series of polynuclear aluminum alkoxides. Alcoholysis of Al₂(OtBu)₆ in 2‐propanol yields the well‐known homoleptic compound Al₄(OiPr)₁₂ ( 2 ). As recently published, similar reactions with Fe₂(OtBu)₆ gave different structures. However, there are recurring structural patterns from alkoxide chemistry found. For a deeper understanding of this hardly predictable chemistry, compounds have to be correlated by such common structural motifs. We briefly report the syntheses of 1 and 2 and the crystal structure of 1 . In addition, we provide an improved synthetic procedure for the preparation of the precursor Al₂(OtBu)₆. The structure of the new compound 1 is comprehensively compared to related structures from literature.     

Cobalt complexes of a selenium diimide and a tellurium diimide dimer

[CoCl₂{N,N′-Te₂(N^tBu)₄}] (1) was obtained in good yields by the reaction of equimolar amounts of (^tBu)NTe(μ-N^tBu)₂TeN(^tBu) and CoCl₂ in toluene under an argon atmosphere. The crystal structure of 1·CH₂Cl₂ showed that the dimeric tellurium diimide ligand is N,N′-chelated to cobalt. The related reaction of Se(N^tBu)₂ and CoCl₂ affords a green product tentatively identified as a 1:1 adduct [CoCl₂{N,N′-Se(N^tBu)₂}] (CHN analysis). However, recrystallization from thf produces the ion-separated complex [Co₂(μ-Cl)₃{N,N′-Se(N^tBu)₂}₂(thf)₂][CoCl₃{NH₂(^tBu)}]·1½thf (2·1½thf), in which the monomeric selenium diimide ligand is N,N′-chelated to cobalt in the cation. A pathway for the formation of 2 from [CoCl₂{N,N′-Se(N^tBu)₂}] in thf is proposed.     

8‐Amidoquinoline, 8‐(Trialkylsilylamido)quinoline, 2‐Pyridylmethylamide,and (2‐Pyridylmethyl)(trialkylsilyl)amide Complexes of Gallium

Lithium 8‐amidoquinoline ( 1 ) and lithium 8‐(trialkylsilylamido)quinoline [SiMe₂tBu ( 2 ), SiiPr₃ ( 3 )] react with dimethylgallium chloride to the metathesis products dimethylgallium 8‐amidoquinoline ( 4 ) as well as dimethylgallium 8‐(trialkylsilylamido)quinoline [SiMe₂tBu ( 5 ), SiiPr₃ ( 6 )]. The gallium atoms are in distorted tetrahedral environments. During the synthesis of 5 , orange dimethylgallium 2‐butyl‐8‐(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)quinoline ( 7 ) was found as by‐product. The metathesis reactions of Me₂GaCl with LiN(R)CH₂Py (Py = 2‐pyridyl) yield the corresponding 2‐pyridylmethylamides Me₂Ga‐N(H)CH₂Py ( 8 ), Me₂Ga‐N(SiMe₂tBu)CH₂Py ( 9 ) and Me₂Ga‐N(SiiPr₃)CH₂Py ( 10 ). In these complexes the gallium atoms show a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere. However, derivative 8 crystallizes dimeric with bridging amido units whereas in 9 and 10 the 2‐pyridylmethylamido moieties act as bidentate ligands leading to monomeric molecules.     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.