The Ramsey number for a cycle of length five vs. a complete graph of order six

It has been conjectured that r(C_m, K_n) = (m − 1)(n − 1) + 1 for all m ≥ n ≥ 4. This has been proved recently for n = 4 and n = 5. In this paper, we prove that r(C₅, K₆) = 21. This raises the possibility that r(C_m, K₆) = 5m − 4 for all m ≥ 5. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 35: 99–108, 2000     

On k-ordered Hamiltonian graphs

A Hamiltonian graph G of order n is k-ordered, 2 ≤ k ≤ n, if for every sequence v₁, v₂, …, v_k of k distinct vertices of G, there exists a Hamiltonian cycle that encounters v₁, v₂, …, v_k in this order. Define f(k, n) as the smallest integer m for which any graph on n vertices with minimum degree at least m is a k-ordered Hamiltonian graph. In this article, answering a question of Ng and Schultz, we determine f(k, n) if n is sufficiently large in terms of k. Let g(k, n) = − 1. More precisely, we show that f(k, n) = g(k, n) if n ≥ 11k − 3. Furthermore, we show that f(k, n) ≥ g(k, n) for any n ≥ 2k. Finally we show that f(k, n) > g(k, n) if 2k ≤ n ≤ 3k − 6. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 32: 17–25, 1999     

Some arrowing results for trees versus complete graphs

For an arbitrary tree T of order m and an arbitrary positive integer n, Chvátal proved that the Ramsey number r(T, K_n) = 1 + (m ? 1) (n ? 1). for graphs G, G₁, and G₂, we say that G arrows G₁ and G₂, written G → (G₁, G₂), if for every factorization G = R ⊕ B, either G₁ is a subgraph of R or G₂ is a subgraph of B. it is shown that (i) for each l ≥ 2, K₁+ (m?1)(n?1) ?E(K₁) → (T, K_n) for m ≥ 2/ ? 1 and n ≥ 2; (ii) K₁ +,(m ?1)(n ?1) ? E(H) → (T, K_n), where H is any tree of order m ? 1, m ≥ 3 and n ≥ 2. It is further shown that result (i) is sharp with respect to the inequality m ≥ 2/? 1; in particular, examples are given to show that K1 + (2l?3)(n?1) E(K₁) ? (P_21?2, K_n) for all n ≥ 2, where P_21?2 denotes the path of order 21 ? 2. Also result (ii) is sharp with respect to the order of H; examples aregiven to show that K₁ + _(m?1)(n?1)? E(K(1, m ? 1)) ?(T, K_n)for any tree T of order m and any n ≥ 2.     

All cycle‐complete graph Ramsey numbers r(Cm,K6)

The cycle‐complete graph Ramsey number r(C_m, K_n) is the smallest integer N such that every graph G of order N contains a cycle C_m on m vertices or has independence number α(G) ≥ n. It has been conjectured by Erd?s, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp that r(C_m, K_n) = (m ? 1) (n ? 1) + 1 for all m ≥ n ≥ 3 (except r(C₃, K₃) = 6). This conjecture holds for 3 ≤ n ≤ 5. In this paper we will present a proof for n = 6 and for all n ≥ 7 with m ≥ n² ? 2n. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 44: 251–260, 2003     

Induced matching extendable graphs

We say that a simple graph G is induced matching extendable, shortly IM-extendable, if every induced matching of G is included in a perfect matching of G. The main results of this paper are as follows: (1) For every connected IM-extendable graph G with |V(G)| ≥ 4, the girth g(G) ≤ 4. (2) If G is a connected IM-extendable graph, then |E(G)| ≥ ${3\over 2}|V(G)| - 2$; the equality holds if and only if G ≅ T × K₂, where T is a tree. (3) The only 3-regular connected IM-extendable graphs are C_n × K₂, for n ≥ 3, and C_2n(1, n), for n ≥ 2, where C_2n(1, n) is the graph with 2n vertices x₀, x₁, …, x_2n−1, such that x_ix_j is an edge of C_2n(1, n) if either |i − j| ≡ 1 (mod 2n) or |i − j| ≡ n (mod 2n). © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 28: 203–213, 1998     

Multiple vertex coverings by specified induced subgraphs

Given graphs H₁,…, H_k, let f(H₁,…, H_k) be the minimum order of a graph G such that for each i, the induced copies of H_i in G cover V(G). We prove constructively that f(H₁, H₂) ≤ 2(n(H₁) + n(H₂) − 2); equality holds when H₁ = H ₂ = K_n. We prove that f(H₁, K _n) = n + 2√δ(H₁)n + O(1) as n → ∞. We also determine f(K_{1, m −1}, K _n) exactly. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 180–190, 2000     

Sharp bounds for decompositions of graphs into complete r-partite subgraphs

If G is a graph on n vertices and r ≥ 2, we let m_r(G) denote the minimum number of complete multipartite subgraphs, with r or fewer parts, needed to partition the edge set, E(G). In determining m_r(G), we may assume that no two vertices of G have the same neighbor set. For such reducedgraphs G, we prove that m_r(G) ≥ log₂ (n + r − 1)/r. Furthermore, for each k ≥ 0 and r ≥ 2, there is a unique reduced graph G = G(r, k) with m_r(G) = k for which equality holds. We conclude with a short proof of the known eigenvalue bound m_r(G) ≥ max{n₊ (G, n₋(G)/(r − 1)}, and show that equality holds if G = G(r, k). © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

On the minimum number of edge-disjoint complete m-partite subgraphs into which Kn can be decomposed

Let α_m(n) denote the minimum number of edge-disjoint complete m-partite subgraphs into which K_n can be decomposed. In [2] the author proved that when m ≥ 3, if (i) n ≡ m and n ≡ m (mod m ?1), or (ii) b ∈ [2, m ?1], n ≥ b(m ?1) + m ? (b ?1), and n ≡ b(m ?1) + m ? (b ?1) (mod m? 1), then α_m(n) = ?(n + m ?3)/(m ?1)? (= ?(n ?1)/(m ?1)?), and that for every integer n, if K_n has an edge-disjoint complete m-partite subgraph decomposition, then α_m(n) ≥ ?(n? 1)/(m? 1)?. In this paper we generally discuss the question as to which integers n's satisfy (or do not) α_m(n) = ?(n ?1)/(m ?1)?. Here we also study the methods to find these integers; the methods are themselves interesting. Our main results are Theorem 2.11, 2.12, and 2.16. Besides, Theorem 2.4 and 2.6 are interesting results too. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

The number of K m,m -free graphs

A graph is called H-free if it contains no copy of H. Denote by f _n (H) the number of (labeled) H-free graphs on n vertices. Erdős conjectured that f _n (H) ≤ 2^{(1+o(1))ex(n,H)}. This was first shown to be true for cliques; then, Erdős, Frankl, and R?dl proved it for all graphs H with χ(H)≥3. For most bipartite H, the question is still wide open, and even the correct order of magnitude of log₂ f _n (H) is not known. We prove that f _n (K _m,m ) ≤ 2 ^O (n ^2−1/m ) for every m, extending the result of Kleitman and Winston and answering a question of Erdős. This bound is asymptotically sharp for m∈{2,3}, and possibly for all other values of m, for which the order of ex(n,K _m,m ) is conjectured to be Θ(n ^2−1/m ). Our method also yields a bound on the number of K _m,m -free graphs with fixed order and size, extending the result of Füredi. Using this bound, we prove a relaxed version of a conjecture due to Haxell, Kohayakawa, and Łuczak and show that almost all K _3,3-free graphs of order n have more than 1/20·ex(n,K _3,3) edges.     

Generalized degree conditions for graphs with bounded independence number

We consider a generalized degree condition based on the cardinality of the neighborhood union of arbitrary sets of r vertices. We show that a Dirac-type bound on this degree in conjunction with a bound on the independence number of a graph is sufficient to imply certain hamiltonian properties in graphs. For K_1,m-free grphs we obtain generalizations of known results. In particular we show: Theorem. Let r ≥ 1 and m ≥ 3 be integers. Then for each nonnegative function f(r, m) there exists a constant C = C(r, m, f(r, m)) such that if G is a graph of order n (n ≥ r, n > m) with δ_r(G) ≥ (n/3) + C and β (G) ≥ f(r, m), then (a) G is traceable if δ(G) ≥ r and G is connected; (b) G is hamiltonian if δ(G) ≥ r + 1 and G is 2-connected; (c) G is hamiltonian-connected if δ(G) ≥ r + 2 and G is 3-connected. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

The symmetric (2k,k)‐graphs

A noncomplete graph G is called an (n, k)‐graph if it is n‐connected and G − X is not (n − |X| + 1)‐connected for any X ⊆ V(G) with |X| ≤ k. Mader conjectured that for k ≥ 3 the graph K_{2k + 2} − (1‐factor) is the unique (2k, k)‐graph. We settle this conjecture for strongly regular graphs, for edge transitive graphs, and for vertex transitive graphs. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 35–51, 2001     

On the crossing number of cm × cn

We show that the M-crossing number cr_M(C_m × C_n) of C_m × C_n behaves asymptotically according to lim_n→∞ {cr_M(C_m × C_n)/((m − 2)n)} = 1, for each m ≥ 3. This result reinforces the conjecture cr(C_m × C_n) = (m − 2)n if 3 ≤ m ≤ n, which has been proved only for m ≤ 6. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 28: 163–170, 1998     

Off‐diagonal and asymptotic results on the Ramsey number r(K2,m,K2,n)

An upper bound on the Ramsey number r(K_2,n‐s,K_2,n) where s ≥ 2 is presented. Considering certain r(K_2,n‐s,K_2,n)‐colorings obtained from strongly regular graphs, we additionally prove that this bound matches the exact value of r(K_2,n‐s,K_2,n) in infinitely many cases if holds. Moreover, the asymptotic behavior of r(K_2,m,K_2,n) is studied for n being sufficiently large depending on m. We conclude with a table of all known Ramsey numbers r(K_2,m,K_2,n) where m,n ≤ 10. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 252–268, 2003     

On Some Three-Color Ramsey Numbers

 In this paper we study three-color Ramsey numbers. Let K _i,j denote a complete i by j bipartite graph. We shall show that (i) for any connected graphs G ₁, G ₂ and G ₃, if r(G ₁, G ₂)≥s(G ₃), then r(G ₁, G ₂, G ₃)≥(r(G ₁, G ₂)−1)(χ(G ₃)−1)+s(G ₃), where s(G ₃) is the chromatic surplus of G ₃; (ii) (k+m−2)(n−1)+1≤r(K _1,k , K _1,m , K _n )≤ (k+m−1)(n−1)+1, and if k or m is odd, the second inequality becomes an equality; (iii) for any fixed m≥k≥2, there is a constant c such that r(K _k,m , K _k,m , K _n )≤c(n/logn), and r(C _2m , C _2m , K _n )≤c(n/logn) ^m/(m−1) for sufficiently large n. Received: July 25, 2000 Final version received: July 30, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Partially supported by RGC, Hong Kong; FRG, Hong Kong Baptist University; and by NSFC, the scientific foundations of education ministry of China, and the foundations of Jiangsu Province Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to the referee for his valuable comments. AMS 2000 MSC: 05C55     

Order and chaos in Hofstadter's Q(n) sequence

A number of observations are made on Hofstadter's integer sequence defined by Q(n) = Q(n − Q(n − 1)) + Q(n − Q(n − 2)), for n > 2, and Q(1) = Q(2) = 1. On short scales, the sequence looks chaotic. It turns out, however, that the Q(n) can be grouped into a sequence of generations. The k‐th generation has 2^k members that have “parents” mostly in generation k − 1 and a few from generation k − 2. In this sense, the sequence becomes Fibonacci type on a logarithmic scale. The variance of S(n) = Q(n) − n/2, averaged over generations, is ≅2^αk, with exponent α = 0.88(1). The probability distribution p*(x) of x = R(n) = S(n)/n^α, n ≫ 1, is well defined and strongly non‐Gaussian, with tails well described by the error function erfc. The probability distribution of x_m = R(n) − R(n − m) is given by p_m(x_m) = λ_m p*(x_m/λ_m), with λ_m → √2 for large m. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Decreasing the diameter of bounded degree graphs

Let f_d (G) denote the minimum number of edges that have to be added to a graph G to transform it into a graph of diameter at most d. We prove that for any graph G with maximum degree D and n > n₀ (D) vertices, f₂(G) = n − D − 1 and f₃(G) ≥ n − O(D³). For d ≥ 4, f_d (G) depends strongly on the actual structure of G, not only on the maximum degree of G. We prove that the maximum of f_d (G) over all connected graphs on n vertices is n/⌊d/2 ⌋ − O(1). As a byproduct, we show that for the n‐cycle C_n, f_d (C_n) = n/(2⌊d/2 ⌋ − 1) − O(1) for every d and n, improving earlier estimates of Chung and Garey in certain ranges. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 35: 161–172, 2000     

On the condition numbers associated with the polar factorization of a matrix

We are interested in the calculation of explicit formulae for the condition numbers of the two factors of the polar decomposition of a full rank real or complex m × n matrix A, where m ≥ n. We use a unified presentation that enables us to compute such condition numbers in the Frobenius norm, in cases where A is a square or a rectangular matrix subjected to real or complex perturbations. We denote by σ₁ (respectively σ _n) the largest (respectively smallest) singular value of A, and by K(A) = σ₁/σ _n the generalized condition number of A. Our main results are that the absolute condition number of the Hermitian polar factor is √2(1 + K(A)²)^1/2/(1 + K(A)) and that the absolute condition number of the unitary factor of a rectangular matrix is 1/σ _n. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Edge disjoint Hamilton cycles in sparse random graphs of minimum degree at least k

Let G_n,m,k denote the space of simple graphs with n vertices, m edges, and minimum degree at least k, each graph G being equiprobable. Let G have property A_k, if G contains ⌊(k − 1)/2⌋ edge disjoint Hamilton cycles, and, if k is even, a further edge disjoint matching of size ⌊n/2⌋. We prove that, for k ≥ 3, there is a constant C_k such that if 2m ≥ C_kn then A_k occurs in G_n,m,k with probability tending to 1 as n → ∞. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 34: 42–59, 2000     

Non-traceability of large connected claw-free graphs

Let G be a connected claw-free graph on n vertices. Let ς₃(G) be the minimum degree sum among triples of independent vertices in G. It is proved that if ς₃(G) ≥ n − 3 then G is traceable or else G is one of graphs G_n each of which comprises three disjoint nontrivial complete graphs joined together by three additional edges which induce a triangle K₃. Moreover, it is shown that for any integer k ≥ 4 there exists a positive integer ν(k) such that if ς₃(G) ≥ n − k, n > ν(k) and G is non-traceable, then G is a factor of a graph G_n. Consequently, the problem HAMILTONIAN PATH restricted to claw-free graphs G = (V, E) (which is known to be NP-complete) has linear time complexity O(|E|) provided that ς₃(G) ≥ . This contrasts sharply with known results on NP-completeness among dense graphs. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 75–86, 1998     

Tilting modules for classical groups and howe duality in positive characteristics

We use the theory of tilting modules for algebraic groups to propose a characteristic free approach to “Howe duality” in the exterior algebra. To any series of classical groups (general linear, symplectic, orthogonal, or spinor) over an algebraically closed field k, we set in correspondence another series of classical groups (usually the same one). Denote byG ₁(m) the group of rankm from the first series and byG ₂(n) the group of rankn from the second series. For any pair (G ₁(m), G₂(n)) we construct theG ₁(m)×G₂(n)-module M(m, n). The construction of M(m, n) is independent of characteristic; for chark=0, the actions ofG ₁(m) andG ₂(n) on M(m, n) form a reductive dual pair in the sense of Howe. We prove that M(m, n) is a tiltingG ₁(m)-andG ₂(n)-module and that End _{G 1}(m) M(m, n) is generated byG ₂(n) and vice versa. The existence of such a module provides much information about the relations between the categoryK ₁(m, n) of rationalG ₁(m)-modules with highest weights bounded in a certain sense byn and the categoryK ₂(m, n) of rationalG ₂(n)-modules with highest weights bounded in the same sense bym. More specifically, we prove that there is a bijection of the set of dominant weights ofG ₁(m)-modules fromK ₁(m, n) to the set of dominant weights ofG ₂(m)-modules fromK ₂(m, n) such that Ext groups for inducedG ₁(m)-modules fromK ₁(m, n) are isomorphic to Ext groups for corresponding Weyl modules overG ₂(n). Moreover, the derived categoriesD ^bK₁(m, n) andD ^bK₂(m, n) appear to be equivalent. We also use our study of the modules M(m, n) to find generators and relations for the algebra of allG-invariants in , whereG=GL _m, Sp_2m, O_m and V is the naturalG-module. Research was supported in part by Grant M7N000/M7N300 from the International Science Foundation and Russian Government and by INTAS Grant 94-4720. Research was supported in part by Grant M8H000/M8H300 from the International Science Foundation and Russian Government and by INTAS Grant 94-4720.