Preparation and characterization of Ru?Pb supported catalysts

Decomposition of Mn₃Mo₂TeO₁₂ during oxidation of toluene to benzaldehyde was observed. Depending on the surface composition of the initial catalyst, the decomposition leads to less active but highly selective MnMoTeO₆ or to MnMoO₄ which is not selective in toluene oxidation.

---

Mn₃Mo₂TeO₁₂ . , MnMoTeO₆, MnMoO₆.

     

Thermodynamics of Formation of Ru(III) and Ru(IV)-μ-Peroxo Complexes

Abstract

Reaction of one half and one equivalents of H₂O₂ with K[Ru^III(pdta-H)Cl].2H₂O gives rise to the μ-peroxo complexes [Ru^III (pdta-H)]₂H₂O₂ and [Ru^IV(pdta-H)]₂O₂, respectively. Equilibrium constants for the formation of the various peroxo species were determined between pH 3-11, in the temperature range 283-313 K and with μ = 0.10 M in KC1. The existence of the various peroxo species was substantiated by potentiometry, spectrophotometry and electrochemical studies. Thermodynamic quantities associated with the formation of the (pdta)Ru^III and (pdta)Ru^IV-μ-peroxo species and their hydrolysis products are reported.     

Methanol Electrooxidation on Smooth Platinum Modified with Ru：the Influence of Ru Coverage and Potentials on Oxidative Current and Products

Methanol oxidation on smooth Pt electrode modified with differ-ent coverage of Ru was studied using cyclic voltammetry and potential step combined with differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy. The current efficiency of formed CO2 was calcu-lated from faraday current and ion current of m/z = 44. The results show that Ru modified Pt electrode with the coverage of ca. 0.3 has the highest catalytic activity for methanol electroox-idation, i. e. faraday current and the current efficiency of CO2 at the low potentials reach to the maximum. In addition, Ru loses its co-catalytic properties at the high potentials.     

The insertion of cycloheptatriene and cyclohepta-1,3-diene into the RuH bond of RuHCl(PPh3)3 to give Ru(η5-C7H9)Cl(PPh3)2 and Ru(η3-C7H11)Cl(PPh3)2

RuHCl(PPh₃)₃ reacts quantitatively with cycloheptatriene in CH₂Cl₂ at 35°C in 15 min to give Ru(η⁵-C₇H₉)Cl(PPh₃)₂ and PPh₃. The major isomer adopts a conformation with inequivalent phosphorus ligands and no plane of symmetry through the C₇H₉ ligand, but rapid intramolecular scrambling with δG³ = 10.6 kcal mol⁻¹ results in an averaged ¹H, ¹³C, and ³¹P NMR spectrum at room temperature. RuHCl(PPh₃)₃ reacts with cyclohepta-1,3-diene to give initially Ru(η³-C₇H₁₁)Cl(PPh₃)₂, but in a subsequent reaction this is dehydrogenated to give Ru(η⁵-C₇H₉)Cl(PPh₃)₂.     

Electrochemical and Photochemical Conversion of [Ru3Ir(μ 3-H)(CO)13] into [Ru3Ir(μ-H)3(CO)12]

Electrochemical and photochemical properties of the tetrahedral cluster [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] were studied in order to prove whether the previously established thermal conversion of this cluster into the hydrogenated derivative [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] also occurs by means of redox or photochemical activation. Two-electron reduction of [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] results in the loss of CO and concomitant formation of the dianion [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₂]^2–. The latter reduction product is stable in CH₂Cl₂ at low temperatures but becomes partly protonated above 283K into the anion [Ru₃Ir(-H)₂(CO)₁₂]^– by traces of water. The dianion [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₂]^2– is also the product of the electrochemical reduction of [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] accompanied by the loss of H₂. Stepwise deprotonation of [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] with Et₄NOH yields [Ru₃Ir(-H)₂(CO)₁₂]^– and [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₂]^2–. Reverse protonation of the anionic clusters can be achieved, e.g., with trifluoromethylsulfonic acid. Thus, the electrochemical conversion of [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] into [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] is feasible, demanding separate two-electron reduction and protonation steps. Irradiation into the visible absorption band of [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] in hexane does not induce any significant photochemical conversion. Irradiation of this cluster in the presence of CO with _irr>340nm, however, triggers its efficient photofragmentation into reactive unsaturated ruthenium and iridium carbonyl fragments. These fragments are either stabilised by dissolved CO or undergo reclusterification to give homonuclear clusters. Most importantly, in H₂-saturated hexane, [Ru₃Ir( ₃-H)(CO)₁₃] converts selectively into the [Ru₃Ir(-H)₃(CO)₁₂] photoproduct. This conversion is particularly efficient at _irr >340nm.     

Hydride addition to Ru3(CO)12. Synthesis and characterization of the transient formyl cluster complex Ru3(CO)11(CHO)−

The reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ (1) with LiEt₃BH at −78°C affords the transient cluster formyl complex Ru₃(CO)₁₁(CHO)⁻ (2) which is observed to decompose by CO loss to give the known hydride cluster Ru₃(CO)₁₁(H)⁻ (3) rapidly at temperatures above −50°C. The formyl cluster has been characterized by low temperature FT-IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR measurements. Formyl trapping experiments and the effect of Bu₃SnH on the rate of formyl decomposition are briefly described.     

The problem of Ru dissolution from Pt–Ru catalysts during fuel cell operation: analysis and solutions

Platinum–ruthenium catalysts are widely used as anode materials in polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEMFCs) operating with reformate gas and in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). Ruthenium dissolution from the Pt–Ru anode catalyst at potentials higher than 0.5?V vs. DHE, followed by migration and deposition to the Pt cathode can give rise to a decrease of the activity of both anode and cathode catalysts and to a worsening of cell performance. A major challenge for a suitable application of Pt–Ru catalysts in PEMFC and DMFC is to improve their stability against Ru dissolution. The purpose of this paper is to provide a better knowledge of the problem of Ru dissolution from Pt–Ru catalysts and its effect on fuel cell performance. The different ways to resolve this problem are discussed.     

Conversion of dichlorodifluoromethane with hydrogen over Pd/AlF3 and Ru/AlF3 prepared by sol–gel method

The reaction of dichlorodifluoromethane and hydrogen has been studied in the gas phase at temperatures 438–538 K and atmospheric pressure over Pd and Ru supported AlF₃ catalysts prepared by sol–gel method. For the hydrogenation of CF₂Cl₂, CH₂F₂ and CH₄ represented more than 97% of the products. The catalytic properties of the catalysts are unchanged with time and they showed no significant difference in their activities. At the steady state, the kinetics of the reaction described by a mechanism of a halogenation/dehalogenation of the Pd and Ru surfaces by CF₂Cl₂ and H₂, respectively. The values of the respective rate constants were then determined. It was concluded that at 448 K, the interaction between the Pd and Ru surfaces with CF₂Cl₂ or H₂ is of the same order of magnitude. The conversion ratio on Ru/Pd supported catalysts within the temperature range used was increased from 1.5 to 4.1, while the selectivity of CH₂F₂/CH₄ ratio was decreased from about 17.4 to 1.8 on the surfaces of both catalysts. This leads to the proposition that the high dispersion of Pd and Ru over the support are responsible for the high activity and high selectivity in CH₂F₂.     

Structure of Oxygen and CO Adsorption on Ru(0001) Electrode

It is important to understand the chemisorption of oxygen and CO on Ru(0001) surface. CO oxidation at oxygen precovered Ru(0001) surface at low oxygen coverages gave an extremely low CO oxidation rate, and it was also observed that, with a nominal oxygen coverage exceeding ca. 3 mL, rather high CO/CO2 conversion probabilities were achieved1. In the case of coadsorption of CO and oxygen on Ru(0001) surface under UHV conditions, a model comprising two CO molecules in an (22)-O unit cel…     

Selected properties of bi- and trinuclear complexes prepared by the reactions of Ru3(CO)12 with β-substituted oxadienes

The reactions of Ru₃(CO)₁₂with 4-phenylbut-3-an-2-ine (1a), 3-phenyl-1-p-tolylprop-2-an-1-ine (1b), and 1,3-diferrocenylprop-2-an-1-ine (1c) afforded the Ru₂(CO)₆(-H)(O=C(R¹)C(H)=C(R²)) (2) and Ru₃(CO)₈(O=C(R¹)C(H)=C(R²))₂(3) complexes. Dissolution of these complexes in CHCl₃or CH₂Cl₂gave rise to the Ru₂(CO)₄(-Cl)₂(O=C(R¹)C(H)=C(R²)) complexes (4). The thermal transformations of complexes 2and 3in the presence of an excess of the ligand yielded the Ru₂O₂(CO)₄(³-OC(R¹)C(H)(CH₂R²)C(R²)C(H)C(R¹))₂(5) and Ru(CO)₂(O=C(R¹)C(H)=C(R²))₂(6) complexes. Analogous complexes were obtained upon more prolonged heating of the starting reaction mixtures. The structures of complexes 4a, 5a, and 6cwere established by X-ray diffraction analysis and confirmed by spectroscopic data.     

Quantum-chemical study of the potential anti-cancer drug Ru–NAMI-A in complex with estrogen and the simulated VA and VCD spectra of estrogen, the Ru–NAMI-A drug, and possible/proposed estrogen–Ru–NAMI-A complexes

Following up on an earlier theoretical report by Knapp-Mohammady (Phys Lett A 372:1881–1884, 2008) on the ground state of the neutral Ru complex NAMI-A (trans-imidazoledimethylsulfoxide-tetrachlororuthenate), we first report here a quantum-chemical study of the effect of both oxidation and reduction of the parent molecule to form the anionic and cationic species. The new structures are compared with the equilibrium nuclear structure reported earlier for the neutral complex. We anticipate that one such Ru cluster, with potential as an anti-cancer drug, will interact via an appropriate receptor, rather than directly with DNA. A receptor for NAMI-A binding in here proposed to be the steroid hormone, estrogen, C₁₈H₂₄O₂. The biomolecular structure of the dicomplex is predicted from restricted Hartree–Fock theory and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The vibrational frequencies of NAMI-A and the dicomplex with estrogen are also reported. Some maps of the ground-state electron-density for the three neutral biomolecular species are finally presented. The use of vibrational spectroscopy, vibrational absorption (VA) and vibrational circular dichorism (VCD) are advocated to be measured, simulated and be used to understand the nature of the interaction of the Ru complex NAMI-A in complex with estrogen. Our aim in presenting these spectral simulations is to motivate the measurement of the VA and VCD spectra of estrogen, the Ru complex NAMI-A and finally of the estrogen–Ru NAMI-A complex. It should also be instructive to measure the VA and VCD spectra of estrogen and the estrogen receptor, both alone, together and finally together in the presence of the Ru NAMI-A complex to substantiate our claim that the Ru complex NAMI-A ties up estrogen, and hence prevents estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of a Heteronuclear Fe–Ru Silyl Complex*

The reaction of the iron metalate [Fe{Si(OMe)₃}(CO)₃(dppm-P)]⁻ (1b) with [Ru(CO)₃Cl(μ-Cl)]₂ afforded the heterodinuclear complex [(OC)₃{(MeO)₃Si}Fe(μ-dppm)Ru(CO)₃Cl)] (Fe–Ru) (3) in which a long Fe–Ru separation of 2.956(1) ? has been crystallographically evidenced. It was shown by density functional theory (DFT) calculations to correspond to the minimum-energy structure. Upon treatment of the corresponding hydrido complex [HFe{Si(OMe)₃}(CO)₃(dppm-P)] (1a) with [Ru(CO)₃Cl(μ-Cl)]₂, the chloride-bridged tetranuclear hydrido complex [(OC)₃{(MeO)₃Si}Fe(H)(μ-dppm)Ru(CO)₂Cl(μ-Cl)]₂ (4) was formed in which the Fe and Ru centers are only linked via bridging dppm ligands. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fabrication of PtRu/Ru core–shell nanowires by exchanging Ru phases

In this study, we successfully fabricated PtRu/Ru core–shell nanowires (NWs) prepared from as-spun Ru/Pt core–shell NWs via a co-electrospinning method. Their formation mechanism together with the structural characteristics, morphology, and composition of the resulting PtRu/Ru core–shell NWs was elucidated by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). PtRu/Ru core–shell NWs fabricated from as-spun Ru/Pt core–shell NWs were formed as a result of interdiffusion between Ru atoms and Pt atoms during calcination after co-electrospinning.     

Mobility of the dppm ligand in dinuclear RuRh complexes: formation of trinuclear RuRh2 and RuRhCu derivatives,and X-ray structure of a new heterobimetallic hydrido-bridged complex

Protonation of RuRhH₂Cl(COD)(dppm)₂ (1) (COD = 1,5 cyclooctadiene, dppm = bisdiphenylphosphinomethane) with HBF₄ · Et₂O gives [RuRhHCl(COD)-(dppm)₂]BF₄ (2), which has been shown to contain two chelating dppm ligands on ruthenium and a bridging hydride (RuH 2.08(7) Å; RhH 1.64(8) Å). Complex 2 reacts with CO to give [RuRhHCl(CO)₃(dppm)₂]BF₄ (3) containing two bridging dppm groups. Reaction of 1 with 0.5 molar equivalents of [RhCl(COD)]₂ at 80°C affords the trinuclear RuRh₂H₂Cl(PhPCH₂PPh₂)(COD)₂(dppm) (4) in low yield (25%), and that with CuCl at room temperature gives RuRhCuH₂Cl₂ (COD)(dppm)₂ (5) in high yield. Complex 5 is not very stable in solution and is converted into RuCuH₂Cl(dppm)₂ (6), a typical adduct between a Lewis acid and a hydride complex, which can be more easily obtained from RuH₂(dppm)₂ and CuCl in toluene at 80°C.     

Ru/Me-BIPAM-catalyzed asymmetric addition of arylboronic acids to aliphatic aldehydes and α-ketoesters

A ruthenium-catalyzed asymmetric arylation of aliphatic aldehydes and α-ketoesters with arylboronic acids has been developed, giving chiral alkyl(aryl)methanols and α-hydroxy esters in good yields. The use of a chiral bidentate phosphoramidite ligand (Me-BIPAM) achieved excellent enantioselectivities.     

A study of the photochemistry and thermal chemistry of Ru3(CO)9(PR3)3{R = Ph,OMe} with two-electron donor ligands

The photochemistry of the tris-substituted clusters Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ (R=Ph or OMe) with no added ligands, with CO, C₂H₄, alkynes and H₂ is compared and contrasted with results obtained for analogous thermal reactions. Photolysis of a CH₂Cl₂ solution of Ru₃(CO)₉(PPh₃)₃ leads to the metallated complex HRu₃(CO)₈(PPh₃)₂(PPh₂C₆H₄). In CCl₄, Ru(CO)₃(PR₃)Cl₂ is formed on photolysis of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃. Photolysis of CO saturated solutions of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ leads to Ru(CO)₄(PR₃). C₂H₄ saturated solutions of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ generate the novel Ru(CO)₃(PR₃)(²-C₂H₄) complexes upon photolysis. With C₂H₂, photolysis of solutions of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ leads to the novel complexes Ru(CO)₃(PR₃)(²-C₂H₂). Substituted alkyne complexes have been prepared. Thermolysis of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ with HCCPh leads to the novel acetylide clusters HRu₃(CO)₆(PR₃)₃(₃-²-C₂Ph). With PhC CPh, only Ru₃(CO)₉{P(OMe)₃}₃ reacts, yielding the novel alkyne cluster Ru₃(CO)₆{P(OMe)₃}₃(₃-²-C₂Ph₂). With H₂, photolysis of CH₂Cl₂ solutions of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ leads to H₂Ru(CO)₂(PR₃)₂. Irradiating a 4:1 CH₂Cl₂ to EtOAc solution of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ under an atmosphere of H₂ leads to the novel dihydrido species H₂Ru₃(CO)₇(PR₃)₃. Thermolysis of H₂ saturated solutions of Ru₃(CO)₉(PR₃)₃ leads to H₄Ru₄(CO)₈(PR₃)₄.     

Carbonylation. 9. Alkoxycarbonylation of pent-3-ene nitrile with homogeneous Co−Ru catalysts: The respective roles of cobalt and ruthenium

Addition of ruthenium compounds (Ru(acac)₃, Ru₃(CO)₁₂) to cobalt catalysts for pent-3-ene nitrile alkoxycarbonylation increases both activity and selectivity in the production of cyanoesters by (i) reducing the amount of Co(II) and facilitating the generation of the active carbonylation species, HCo(CO)_n, and (ii) improving the isomerisation of pentene nitriles, providing significant amounts of pent-4-ene nitrile for the formation of the ω-ester.     

Mixed Ruthenium–Iridium Carbonyl Cluster Complexes. Synthesis of the Anions [Ru3Ir2(CO)14]2− and [Ru3Ir2(CO)14H]− and Crystal Structures of Their [tetraphenylphosphonium]+ Salts

The reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ and [Ir(CO)₄]^- (as [PPh₄]⁺ or [N(PPh₃)₂]⁺ salts) yields the anion [Ru₃Ir₂(CO)₁₄]^2- (1) which has been found to derive from the intermediate [Ru₃Ir(CO)₁₃]^- anion. Treatment of (1) with acids gives the conjugated hydrido species [Ru₃Ir₂(CO)₁₄H]^- (2). The two anions were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction of their [PPh₄]⁺ salts. [PPh₄]₂[Ru₃Ir₂(CO)₁₄]: space group C2/c, Z=4, a=22.121(5) Å, b=10.546(5) Å, c=25.931(5) Å, =103.870(5)°, R=0.052 and R_w=0.130 for 3128 independent reflections with I>2(I ). [PPh₄][Ru₃Ir₂(CO)₁₄H]: space group P2₁/c, Z=8, a=22.833(5) Å, b=13.893(5) Å, c=25.810(5) Å, =92.650(5)°, R=0.070 and R_w=0.150 for 12141 independent reflections with I>2(I). Both anions 1 and 2 have a trigonal bipyramidal metal frame. There are two independent anions in the asymmetric unit of 2 differing in their ligand stereochemistry.     

Comprehensive thermochemistry of W-H bonding in the metal hydrides CpW(CO)2(IMes)H, [CpW(CO)2(IMes)H](•+), and [CpW(CO)2(IMes)(H)2]+. Influence of an N-heterocyclic carbene ligand on metal hydride bond energies

The free energies interconnecting nine tungsten complexes have been determined from chemical equilibria and electrochemical data in MeCN solution (T = 22 °C). Homolytic W-H bond dissociation free energies are 59.3(3) kcal mol(-1) for CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H and 59(1) kcal mol(-1) for the dihydride [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)(H)(2)](+) (where IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene), indicating that the bonds are the same within experimental uncertainty for the neutral hydride and the cationic dihydride. For the radical cation, [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H](?+), W-H bond homolysis to generate the 16-electron cation [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)](+) is followed by MeCN uptake, with free energies for these steps being 51(1) and -16.9(5) kcal mol(-1), respectively. Based on these two steps, the free energy change for the net conversion of [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H](?+) to [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)(MeCN)](+) in MeCN is 34(1) kcal mol(-1), indicating a much lower bond strength for the 17-electron radical cation of the metal hydride compared to the 18-electron hydride or dihydride. The pK(a) of CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H in MeCN was determined to be 31.9(1), significantly higher than the 26.6 reported for the related phosphine complex, CpW(CO)(2)(PMe(3))H. This difference is attributed to the electron donor strength of IMes greatly exceeding that of PMe(3). The pK(a) values for [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H](?+) and [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)(H)(2)](+) were determined to be 6.3(5) and 6.3(8), much closer to the pK(a) values reported for the PMe(3) analogues. The free energy of hydride abstraction from CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H is 74(1) kcal mol(-1), and the resultant [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)](+) cation is significantly stabilized by binding MeCN to form [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)(MeCN)](+), giving an effective hydride donor ability of 57(1) kcal mol(-1) in MeCN. Electrochemical oxidation of [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)](-) is fully reversible at all observed scan rates in cyclic voltammetry experiments (E° = -1.65 V vs Cp(2)Fe(+/0) in MeCN), whereas CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)H is reversibly oxidized (E° = -0.13(3) V) only at high scan rates (800 V s(-1)). For [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)(MeCN)](+), high-pressure NMR experiments provide an estimate of ΔG° = 10.3(4) kcal mol(-1) for the displacement of MeCN by H(2) to give [CpW(CO)(2)(IMes)(H)(2)](+).     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [ Cp* Ru(η6- C6H5B Ph3)]

The title complex [Cp*Ru(η6-C6H5BPh3)] has been synthesized by the reaction of [Cp*Ru(H2O)(NBD)]BF4 with H2 and NaBPh4, and its crystal structure was determined by singlecrystal X-ray diffraction analysis. It crystallizes in triclinic, space group P(1) with a = 11.0610(10), b = 11.2317(10), c = 12.3633(11) (A), α = 81.419(2), β = 67.8370(10), γ = 88.370(2)°, V= 1405.9(2) (A)3,Z= 2, C34H35BRu, Mr= 555.50, Dc = 1.312 g/cm3, F(000) = 576 and μ(MoKa) = 0.577 mm-1. The final R and wR are 0.0559 and 0.1483, respectively for 4365 observed reflections with I ＞ 2σ(Ⅰ). In the title complex, the four phenyl rings bonded to the B atom are deposited in a tetrahedral geometry,and one of the phenyl rings is η6-bonded to ruthenium.