On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

The covering problem for the fields Q(−1)12 and Q(−3)12

Let k be a positive square free integer, $\text{N(?k)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ the ring of algebraic integers in $\text{Q(?k)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ and S the unit sphere in C_n, complex n-space. If A₁,…, A_n are n linearly independent points of C_n then L = {u₁Au + … + u_nA_n} with $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{∈ N(?k)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is called a k-lattice. The determinant of L is denoted by d(L). If L is a covering lattice for S, then $\text{θ(S, L) =}\text{V(S)}\text{d(L)}$ is the covering density. L is called locally (absolutely) extreme if θ(S, L) is a local (absolute) minimum. In this paper we determine unique classes of extreme lattices for k = 1 and k = 3.     

On the closability of some positive definite symmetric differential forms on c0∞(ω)

Let $\text{S}$ be a Dirichlet form in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω; m)}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 2, and m a Radon measure on Ω; for each integer k with 1 ? k < n, let $\text{S}$_k be a Dirichlet form on some k-dimensional submanifold $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$ of Ω. The paper is devoted to the study of the closability of the forms E with domain $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ and defined by: $\text{(?,g)=}$$\text{E}$$\text{(?, g)+}\text{∑}\text{i}\text{p}\text{=1}$$\text{E}$k_i where 1 ? k_p < ? < n, and where , g^k_i denote restrictions of ?, g in $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ to . Conditions are given for E to be closable if, for each i = 1,…, p, one has k_i = n ? i. Other conditions are given for E to be nonclosable if, for some i, k_i < n ? i.     

Singular perturbations in the interaction representation,II

Perturbations of $\text{(?Δ)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>m</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{in}\text{L}{}^2\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{),}\text{for}\text{k ? 1}$ and suitable m, by distributions V for which $\text{V}\text{?}\text{(k) = 0(¦k¦}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{),}\text{where}\text{α =}\text{(m + 1 ? ε)}\text{2 ? k}\text{, 0 < ε ? m + 1 ? 2k}$, are shown to correspond to self-adjoint operators H_v, in such a way that H_v depends continuously on V, and agrees with H + V when V is sufficiently regular. These results extend joint work with Irving E. Segal [J. Functional Analysis38 (1980), 71–98], in which perturbations of $\text{(}\text{?id}\text{dx}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ by distributions V with bounded Fourier transforms in L²(R¹) were considered.     

The probability that k positive integers are relatively r-prime

If r, k are positive integers, then $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples of positive integers (x₁, x₂, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r = 1. An explicit formula for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ is derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{ζ(rk)}$.If S = {p₁, p₂, …, p_a} is a finite set of primes, then 〈S〉 = {p₁^a₁p₂^a₂…p_s^a_s; p_i ∈ S and a_i ≥ 0 for all i} and $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples (x₁, x₃, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r ∈ 〈S〉. Asymptotic formulas for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ are derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(p}{}_1\text{… p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{ζ(rk)(p}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1) … (p}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1)}$.     

On the order of the error function of the (k,r)-integers

Let k and r be fixed integers such that 1 < r < k. Any positive integer n of the form n = a^kb, where b is r-free, is called a (k, r)-integer. In this paper we prove that if Q_k,r(x) denotes the number of (k, r)-integers ≤ x, then $\text{Q}{}_{\mathrm{k,r}}\text{(x) =}\text{xζ(k)}\text{ζ(r)}\text{+ Δ}{}_{\mathrm{k,r}}\text{(x)}$, where $\text{Δ}{}_{\mathrm{k,r}}\text{(x) = O(x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>r</mtext>}}\text{exp}\text{[?B}\text{log}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext>}}\text{x (}\text{log log}\text{x)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>5</mtext>}}\text{])}$, B being a positive constant depending on r and the O-estimate is uniform in k. On the assumption of the Riemann hypothesis, we improve the above order estimate of Δ_k,r(x) and prove that

$\text{1}\text{x}\text{∫}\text{1}\text{α}\text{δ}{}_{\mathrm{k,r}}\text{(t)dt=0(x}\text{1}\text{k}\text{ω(x))}\text{or}\text{0(x}{}^{\mathrm{3/(4r+1)}}\text{ω(x))}$

, according as $\text{k ≤}\text{(4r + 1)}\text{3}$ or $\text{k >}\text{(4r + 1)}\text{3}$, where ω(x) = exp [B log x(log log x)^?1].     

Pairs of additive equations II. Large odd degree

Let k be an odd positive integer. Davenport and Lewis have shown that the equations

$\text{a}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{+…+a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=0}$

with integer coefficients, have a nontrivial solution in integers x₁,…, x_N provided that

$\text{N?[36klog6k]}$

Here it is shown that for any ? > 0 and k > k₀(?) the equations have a nontrivial solution provided that

$\text{N?}\text{8}\text{log 2}\text{+?}\text{k log k.}$

     

A note on the probabilistic approach to Turán's problem

The Turán number T(n, l, k) is the smallest possible number of edges in a k-graph on n vertices such that every l-set of vertices contains an edge. Given a k-graph H = (V(H), E(H)), we let X_s(S) equal the number of edges contained in S, for any s-set S?V(H). Turán's problem is equivalent to estimating the expectation E(X_l), given that min(X_l) ≥ 1. The following lower bound on the variance of X_s is proved:

$\text{Var(X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)?mm}\text{n?2k}\text{s?k}\text{n}\text{s}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{n}\text{k}{}^1$

, where m = |E(H)| and $\text{m}\text{= (}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ? m}$. This implies the following: putting t(k, l) = lim_n→∞T(n, l, k)(_kⁿ)^?1 then t(k, l) ≥ T(s, l, k)((_k^s) ? 1)^?1, whenever s ≥ l > k ≥ 2. A connection of these results with the existence of certain t-designs is mentioned.     

Estimées Ck pour les couronnes de convexes de type fini de Cn

C^k estimates for convex domains of finite type in $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are known from Alexandre (C. R. Acad. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 23–26). We now want to show the same result for annuli. Precisely, we show that for all convex domains D and D′ relatively compact of $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, of finite type m and m′ such that $\text{D}\text{?D′}$, for all q=1,…,n?2, there exists a linear operator $\text{T}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{q}}$ from $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{0,q}}\text{(}\text{D′?D}\text{)}$ to $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{0,q?1}}\text{(}\text{D′?D}\text{)}$ such that for all $\text{k∈}\text{N}$ and all (0,q)-form f, $\text{?}\text{?}$-closed of regularity C^k up to the boundary, $\text{T}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{f}$ is of regularity C^{k+1/max(m,m′)} up to the boundary and $\text{?}\text{?}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^1\text{f=f}$. We fit the method of Diederich, Fisher and Fornaess to the annuli by switching z and ζ. However, the integration kernel will not have the same behavior on the frontier as in the Diederich–Fischer–Fornaess case and we have to alter the Diederich–Fornaess support function which will not be holomorphic anymore. Also, we take care of the so generated residual term in the homotopy formula and show that it is extremely regular so that solve the $\text{?}\text{?}$ problem for it will not be difficult. To cite this article: W. Alexandre, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

On solutions of “equations in symmetric groups”

Let x?S_n, the symmetric group on n symbols. Let θ? Aut(S_n) and let the automorphim order of x with respect to θ be defined by

$\text{γθ(x)=}\text{min}\text{{k:x xθ xθ}{}^2\text{? xθ}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{=1}}$

where xθ is the image of x under θ. Let α_g? Aut(S_n) denote conjugation by the element g?S_n. Let where s and k are positive integers and $\text{a}\text{b}$ denotes a divides b. Further h(s, k : n) ≡ b(1; s, k : n), where 1 denotes the identity automorphim. If g?S_n let c = f(g, s) denote the number of symbols in g which are in cycles of length not dividing the integer s, and let g_s denote the product of all cycles in g whose lengths do not divide s. Then g_s moves c symbols. The main results proved are: (1) recursion: if n ? c + 1 and t = n ? c ? 1 then $\text{b(g; s, 1:n)=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>i</mtext><mtext>s</mtext>}}\text{b(g; s, 1:n?1)(}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(i?1)!}$ (2) reduction: b(g; s, 1 : c)h(s, 1 : i) = b(g; s, 1 : i + c); (3) distribution: let D(θ, n) ≡ {(k, b) : k?Z⁺ and b = b(θ; 1, k : n) ≠ 0}; then D(θ, m) = D(φ, m) ∨ m ? N = N(θ, φ) iff θ is conjugate to φ; (4) evaluation: the number of cycles in g_s^s of any given length is smaller than the smallest prime dividing s iff b(g_s; s, 1 : c) = 1. If g = (12 … p^m)^t and $\text{sk}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ then $\text{b(g;s,k:p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{) {}{}^0{}_{\mathrm{\pm 1}}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{p)}$.     

On matrix functions which commute with their derivative

We improve several results published from 1950 up to 1982 on matrix functions commuting with their derivative, and establish two results of general interest. The first one gives a condition for a finite-dimensional vector subspace E(t) of a normed space not to depend on t, when t varies in a normed space. The second one asserts that if A is a matrix function, defined on a set ?, of the form A(t)= U diag(B₁(t),…,B_p(t)) U^-1, t ∈ ?, and if each matrix function B_k has the polynomial form

$\text{B}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(t)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{ki}}\text{(t)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{, t∈ ?, k∈{1,…,p}}$

then A itself has the polynomial form

$\text{A(t)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{d?1}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)C}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{,t∈?}$

, where

$\text{d=}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{p}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$

, d_k being the degree of the minimal polynomial of the matrix C_k, for every k ∈ {1,…,p}.     

A remark to the preceding paper by Chernoff

It is shown that the method of Chernoff developed in the preceding paper can be modified to prove the essential self-adjointness on C₀^∞(R^m) of all positive powers of the Schrödinger operator T = ? Δ + q if q real and in C^∞(R^m) and if $\text{T ? ?a ? b ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{on}\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}$.     

Votes and a half-binomial

In two party elections with popular vote ratio $\text{p}\text{q}\text{,}\text{1}\text{2}\text{≤p=1 ?q}$, a theoretical model suggests replacing the so-called MacMahon cube law approximation $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^3$, for the ratio $\text{P}\text{Q}$ of candidates elected, by the ratio $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(q)}$ of the two half sums in the binomial expansion of (p+q)^2k+1 for some k. This ratio is nearly $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^3$ when k = 6. The success probability $\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)=(}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{(p}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+q}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}$ for the power law $\text{(}\text{p}\text{q}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{?}\text{P}\text{Q}$ is shown to so closely approximate $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)=Σ}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1}}\text{)p}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1?r}}\text{q}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, if we choose $\text{a = a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(2k+1)!}\text{4}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{k!k!}$, that $\text{1≤}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}\text{≤1.01884086}$ for $\text{k≥1}\text{if}\text{1}\text{2}\text{≤p≤1}$. Computationally, we avoid large binomial coefficients in computing $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)}$ for k>22 by expressing $\text{2?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(p)?1}$ as the sum $\text{(p?q) Σ}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(4pq)}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(2s+1)}$, whose terms decrease by the factors $\text{(4pq)(1?}\text{1}\text{2s}\text{)}$. Setting K = 4k+3, we compute a_k for the large k using a continued fraction $\text{πa}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^2\text{=}\text{K+1}{}^2\text{(}\text{2K+3}{}^2\text{(}\text{2K+5}{}^2\text{(2K+…)}\text{)}\text{)}$ derived from the ratio of π to the finite Wallis product approximation.     

On a conjecture by D. Ž. D̄okovic

It is shown that if $\text{A?Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?{J}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$ satisfies

$\text{nkσ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(A)?(n?k+1)}{}^2\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{(A)}$

$\text{(k=1,2,…,n)}$

, where σ_k(A) denotes the sum of all kth order subpermanent of A, then Per[λJ_n+(1?λ)A] is strictly decreasing in the interval 0<λ<1.     

On the fair coin tossing process

Let Ω = {1, 0} and for each integer n ≥ 1 let $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= Ω × Ω × … × Ω}$ (n-tuple) and $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{= {(a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)|(a}{}_1\text{, a}{}_2\text{, … , a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{and}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= k}}$ for all k = 0,1,…,n. Let {Y_m}_m≥1 be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables such that $\text{P(Y}{}_1\text{= 0) = P(Y}{}_1\text{= 1) =}\text{1}\text{2}$. For each A in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$, let T_A be the first occurrence time of A with respect to the stochastic process {Y_m}_m≥1. R. Chen and A.Zame (1979, J. Multivariate Anal. 9, 150–157) prove that if n ≥ 3, then for each element A in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$, there is an element B in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ such that the probability that T_B is less than T_A is greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$. This result is sharpened as follows: (I) for n ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ k ≤ n ? 1, each element A in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$, there is an element B also in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$ such that the probability that T_B is less than T_A is greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$; (II) for n ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ k ≤ n ? 1, each element A = (a₁, a₂,…,a_n) in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$, there is an element C also in $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}$ such that the probability that T_A is less than T_C is greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$ if n ≠ 2m or n = 2m but a_i = a_{i + 1} for some 1 ≤ i ≤ n?1. These new results provide us with a better and deeper understanding of the fair coin tossing process.     

Positive definite distributions on K\GK

Let G be a semisimple noncompact Lie group with finite center and let K be a maximal compact subgroup. Then W. H. Barker has shown that if T is a positive definite distribution on G, then T extends to Harish-Chandra's Schwartz space $\text{C}$¹(G). We show that the corresponding property is no longer true for the space of double cosets $\text{K}\text{G}\text{K}$. If G is of real-rank 1, we construct liner functionals $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{? (C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{))′}$ for each p, 0 < p ? 2, such that $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$ but T_p does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. In particular, if p ? 1, T_v does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^1\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. We use this to answer a question (in the negative) raised by Barker whether for a K-bi-invariant distribution T on G to be positive definite it is enough to verify that $\text{T(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. The main tool used is a theorem of Trombi-Varadarajan.     

A divided difference inequality for n-convex functions

For a₍₁₎ ? a₍₂₎ ? ··· ? a_(n) ? 0, b₍₁₎ ? b₍₂₎ ? ··· ? b_(n) ? 0, the ordered values of a_i, b_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that

$\text{∑}\text{1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m?k?1}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{+}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{[m?k]}}\text{(k+1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>q</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$

where $\text{1}\text{p}\text{+}\text{1}\text{q}\text{= 1, b}{}_{\mathrm{[j]}}\text{= b}{}_{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{+ b}{}_{\mathrm{(j\; +\; 1)}}\text{+ ··· + b}{}_{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{,}\text{and}\text{k}$ is the integer such that $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k\; ?\; 1)}}\text{?}\text{b[m ? k]}\text{(k + 1)}$ and $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k)}}\text{<}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{[m\; ?\; k\; +\; 1]}}\text{k}$. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a_(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.     

Author index

A matrix T=(t_ik) is introduced, the coefficients of which are defined by $\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{ik}}\text{:= (}\text{i}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(ik)!)}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{x?S}}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{, i, k?N={1, 2, 3,…,}}$, where a_i(x) denotes the s the number of i cycles in the element x of the symmetric group S_n. It is shown that these numbers are natural numbers, that they are easy to evaluate, and that they serve very well in order to formulate an infinite number of characterizations of multiply transitive subgroups of symmetric groups in terms of the cycle structure of their elements.