2J(P,C) and 3J(P,C) Coupling Constants in Some New Phosphoramidates. Crystal Structures of CF3C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2 and 4‐NO2‐C6H4N(H)P(O)[4‐CH3‐NC5H9]2

Some new phosphoramidates were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of CF₃C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH₃)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂ ( 1 ) and 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄N(H)P(O)[4‐CH₃‐NC₅H₉]₂ ( 6 ) were confirmed by X‐ray single crystal determination. Compound 1 forms a centrosymmetric dimer and compound 6 forms a polymeric zigzag chain, both via ‐N‐H…O=P‐ intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Also, weak C‐H…F and C‐H…O hydrogen bonds were observed in compounds 1 and 6 , respectively. ¹³C NMR spectra were used for study of ²J(P,C) and ³J(P,C) coupling constants that were showed in the molecules containing N(C₂H₅)₂ and N(C₂H₅)(CH₂C₆H₅) moieties, ²J(P,C)>³J(P,C). A contrast result was obtained for the compounds involving a five‐membered ring aliphatic amine group, NC₄H₈. ²J(P,C) for N(C₂H₅)₂ moiety and in NC₄H₈ are nearly the same, but ³J(P, C) values are larger than those in molecules with a pyrrolidinyl ring. This comparison was done for compounds with six and seven‐membered ring amine groups. In compounds with formula XP(O)[N(CH₂R)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂, ²J(P,CH₂)_benzylic>²J(P,CH₂)_aliphatic, in an agreement with our previous study.     

New rac‐XP(O)(OC6H5)(NHC6H4‐p‐CH3) [X = N(CH3)(cyclo‐C6H11) and NH(C3H5)] and rac‐(C6H5CH2NH)P(O)(OC6H5)(NH‐cyclo‐C6H11) mixed‐amide phosphinates

The mixed‐amide phosphinates, rac‐phenyl (N‐methylcyclohexylamido)(p‐tolylamido)phosphinate, C₂₀H₂₇N₂O₂P, (I), and rac‐phenyl (allylamido)(p‐tolylamido)phosphinate, C₁₆H₁₉N₂O₂P, (II), were synthesized from the racemic phosphorus–chlorine compound (R,S)‐(Cl)P(O)(OC₆H₅)(NHC₆H₄‐p‐CH₃). Furthermore, the phosphorus–chlorine compound ClP(O)(OC₆H₅)(NH‐cyclo‐C₆H₁₁) was synthesized for the first time and used for the synthesis of rac‐phenyl (benzylamido)(cyclohexylamido)phosphinate, C₁₉H₂₅N₂O₂P, (III). The strategies for the synthesis of racemic mixed‐amide phosphinates are discussed. The P atom in each compound is in a distorted tetrahedral (N¹)P(=O)(O)(N²) environment. In (I) and (II), the p‐tolylamido substituent makes a longer P—N bond than those involving the N‐methylcyclohexylamido and allylamido substituents. In (III), the differences between the P—N bond lengths involving the cyclohexylamido and benzylamido substituents are not significant. In all three structures, the phosphoryl O atom takes part with the N—H unit in hydrogen‐bonding interactions, viz. an N—H...O=P hydrogen bond for (I) and (N—H)(N—H)...O=P hydrogen bonds for (II) and (III), building linear arrangements along [001] for (I) and along [010] for (III), and a ladder arrangement along [100] for (II).     

Synthesis,characterization, and molecular structures of Ni(II) and Cd(II) complexes derived from dithiophosphonate

Two novel dithiophosphonate ligands, HS₂P(p‐C₆H₄OMe)(OCH₂CH₂CH(CH₃)₂) ( 1 ) and HS₂P(p‐C₆H₄OMe)(OCH(CH₃)₂) ( 2 ), were synthesized and characterized by multinuclear (¹H, ³¹P, and ¹³C) NMR, infrared spectroscopy as well as elemental analysis. The reactions of 1 and 2 with NiCl₂·6H₂O and Cd(NO₃)₂·4H₂O in methanol led to novel complexes 3 and 4 . The single crystal X‐ray structures of 3 and 4 showed tetracoordinated structure with square planar geometry for the nickel complex, while it showed pentacoordinated structure with distorted square‐pyramid environment for the cadmium complex.     

Addition Reactions of Me3SiCN with Aldehydes Catalyzed by Aluminum Complexes Containing in their Coordination Sphere O,S, and N Ligands

The reaction of one equivalent of LAlH₂ ( 1 ; L=HC(CMeNAr)₂, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃, β‐diketiminate ligand) with two equivalents of 2‐mercapto‐4,6‐dimethylpyrimidine hydrate resulted in LAl[(μ‐S)(m‐C₄N₂H)(CH₂)₂]₂ ( 2 ) in good yield. Similarly, when N‐2‐pyridylsalicylideneamine, N‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)salicylaldimine, and ethyl 3‐amino‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene‐2‐carboxylate were used as starting materials, the corresponding products LAl[(μ‐O)(o‐C₆H₄)CN(C₅NH₄)]₂ ( 3 ), LAlH[(μ‐O)(o‐C₄H₄)CN(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)] ( 4 ), and LAl[(μ‐NH)(o‐C₈SH₈)(COOC₂H₅)]₂ ( 5 ) were isolated. Compounds 2 – 5 were characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy as well as by single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis. Surprisingly, compounds 2 – 5 exhibit good catalytic activity in addition reactions of aldehydes with trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN).     

Two conformers in the solid state for a novel organotin(IV) complex of a phosphoramidate: Syntheses, spectroscopic study and crystal structures of several new organotin(IV) complexes of N-benzoylphosphoric triamides

Several novel organotin(IV) complexes with formula SnCl₂(CH₃)₂(X)₂, X = C₆H₅C(O)NHP(O)(NC₄H₈)₂ (1), C₆H₅C(O)NHP(O)(NC₅H₁₀)₂ (2), C₆H₅C(O)NHP(O)[N(CH₃)(C₆H₁₁)]₂ (3), C₆H₅C(O)NHP(O)[NH-C(CH₃)₃]₂ (4) were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures have been determined for each of the four compounds. Compound 1 exists in the form of two symmetrically independent molecules in the crystalline state due to differences in their similar torsion angles. In all of the four structures there are intramolecular -Sn-Cl?H-N- hydrogen bonds, in addition to weak C-H?O and C-H?Cl hydrogen bonds. Both ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra show the coupling of ^119/117Sn nuclei with methyl proton and carbon atoms. The δ(³¹P) of these complexes are in upfields with respect to their corresponding reported ligands. The spectroscopic and structural properties of these complexes were compared with those corresponding ligands.     

Synthesen nitro-substituierter cis-bis(phenyl)platin(II)-verbindungen

Syntheses of the compounds [Pt(η⁴-COD)(4-XC₆H₄)(4-O₂NC₆H₄)] (X = (CH₃₂N, CH₃O, CH₃, NO₂; COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) and cis-{Pt[P(C₆H₅₃]₂- (4-O₂NC₆H₄(4-XC₆H₄)} (X = CF₃, NO₂) are reported. Experiments to synthesize cis-{Pt[P(C₆H₅)₃]₂(4-O₂NC₆H₄(4-XC₆H₄} (X = (CH₃₂N, CH₃O, CH₃) with an electron donor in one and an electron acceptor in the second platinum-bonded phenyl ring resulted in the spontaneous reductive elimination of 4-O₂NC₆H₄C₆-H₄X-(4). This observation supports the hypothesis of a donor-acceptor interaction in the transition state of the reductive biphenyl elimination.     

Syntheses and characterization of new palladium(II) complexes with functionally substituted cyclopentadienyl groups

Thallium [1-(p-tolylimino)-2-methylpropyl]cyclopentadienide, Tl[C₅H₄C(=NC₆H₄CH₃)CH(CH₃)₂], was prepared and treatment of the salt with [{PdCl₂(PREt₂)}₂] (R = Ph and Et) yielded mononuclear palladium(II) complexes, [Pd{η⁵-C₅H₄C(=NC₆H₄CH₃)CH(CH₃)₂}Cl(PREt₂)], with an imidoyl-substituted η⁵-cyclopentadienyl group. In addition, [Pd(η⁵-C₅H₄-COY)Cl(PPhEt₂)] (Y = CH₃ and OCH₃) complexes were obtained from the sodium salts of their substituted cyclopentadienyl groups. These new compounds were characterized by means of ¹H and ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopy.     

Synthesis of Heteroleptic Cerium(IV) Complexes Using a Heptadentate (N4O3) Tripodale Schiff‐base Ligand

The Cerium(IV) complexes [{N[CH₂CH₂N=CH(2‐O‐3,5‐^tBu₂C₆H₂)]₃}CeCl] ( 1 ) and [{N[CH₂CH₂N=CH(2‐O‐3,5‐^tBu₂C₆H₂)]₃}Ce(NO₃)] ( 2 ) were derived from the condensation of tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine and 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylsalicylaldehyde and the appropriate Ce starting material CeCl₃(H₂O)₆ and (NH₄)₂[Ce(NO₃)₆], respectively. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction studies reveal monomeric complexes.     

Reactions of p-nitrobenzyl halides with dialkyl phosphite anions in dimethyl sulfoxide

The reactions of p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂Cl with (RO)₂PO⁻ in Me₂SO with R = Me, Et, Pr, Bu, CF₃CH₂, i-Pr or Ph involve the formation of p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂P(O)(OR)₂ by S_N2 substitution followed by a further S_RN1 p-nitrobenzylation of p-O₂NC₆H₄CH[P(O)(OR)₂]⁻ and p-O₂NC₆H₄C(CH₂C₆H₄NO₂-p)[P(O)(OR)₂]⁻. With p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂Br, the reactions proceed mainly to form p-O₂NC₆H₄CH, which undergoes reaction with p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂Br to form p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂CH₂C₆H₄NO₂-p. Halophilic reaction of (RO)₂PO⁻ with p-O₂NC₆H₄CH(CH₃)X (X = Cl, Br) leading to the bibenzyl is the preferred reaction course. Reactions of (RO)₂PO⁻ or p-O₂NC₆H₄CH[P(O)(OR)₂]⁻ with p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂X in Me₂SO do not form significantamounts of p-O₂NC₆H₄CHX⁻ that would yieldp-O₂NC₆H₄CH=CHC₆H₄NO₂-p. However, p-Cl-C₆H₄CH[P(O)(OEt)₂]⁻ readily abstracts the benzylic proton from p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂X to form the stilbene, although p-O₂NC₆H₄CH₂Br reacts with p-O₂NC₆H₄-CH[P(O)(OR)₂]⁻ to form p-O₂NC₆H₄CH(CH₂C₆-H₄NO₂-p)P(O)(OR)₂ in a reaction mixture not inhibited by (t-Bu)₂NO•. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 9:201–208, 1998     

Crystalline Radicals Derived from Classical N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes

One‐electron reduction of C2‐arylated 1,3‐imidazoli(ni)um salts (IPr^Ar)Br (Ar=Ph, 3 a ; 4‐DMP, 3 b ; 4‐DMP=4‐Me₂NC₆H₄) and (SIPr^Ar)I (Ar=Ph, 4 a ; 4‐Tol, 4 b ) derived from classical NHCs (IPr=:C{N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂CHCH, 1 ; SIPr=:C{N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂CH₂CH₂, 2 ) gave radicals [(IPr^Ar)]^. (Ar=Ph, 5 a ; 4‐DMP, 5 b ) and [(SIPr^Ar)]^. (Ar=Ph, 6 a ; 4‐Tol, 6 b ). Each of 5 a , b and 6 a , b exhibited a doublet EPR signal, a characteristic of monoradical species. The first solid‐state characterization of NHC‐derived carbon‐centered radicals 6 a , b by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction is reported. DFT calculations indicate that the unpaired electron is mainly located at the original carbene carbon atom and stabilized by partial delocalization over the adjacent aryl group.     

Simulating the active sites of copper-trafficking proteins. Density functional structural and spectroscopy studies on copper(I) complexes with thiols,carboxylato, amide and phenol ligands

A series of mononuclear binary and ternary Cu(I) complexes with formato, formamide, methylphenol, and methanethiolato ligands were optimized at DFT-B3LYP/6-31G** (BS1) and DFT-B3LYP/6-311++G** (BS2) levels of theory. The solvent effect was taken into account via PCM method (BS1W and BS2W, respectively). The coordination arrangement for [Cu^I(SCH₃/S(H)CH₃)(OOCH)]^?/0 and [Cu^I(SCH₃/S(H)CH₃)(O(H)(C₆H₄)CH₃)]^0/+ was pseudo-linear and for [Cu^I(SCH₃/S(H)CH₃)(OOCH)(OC(H)NH₂)]^?/0 was pseudo-trigonal. The [Cu^I(S-S(H)CH₃/Cu^I(S-SCH₃)]^+/0 link even to amide carbonyl and to general O(H)R residues (R=C₆H₅CH₃). [Cu^I(SCH₃)₂(O(H)(C₆H₄)CH₃)]^? went towards dissociation of the O(H)(C₆H₄)CH₃ ligand, whereas [Cu^I(S(H)CH₃)₂(O(H)(C₆H₄)CH₃)]⁺ converged nicely, maintaining the hydroxy function linked to the metal. The trends of total electronic energies seemed to be significant, suggesting that linear Cu^IS₂ coordination is more suitable than Cu^IS, Cu^IS₃ and Cu^IS₄ arrangements. The formation energies of [Cu^I(S(H)CH₃/SCH₃)(OOCH)]^0/?1 were higher than those of [Cu^I(S(H)CH₃/SCH₃)₂]^+/? on starting from [Cu^I(S(H)CH₃/Cu^I(SCH₃)]^+/0 by ca. 11–9 kcal mol^?1 (BS2W). The structural arrangements, bond distances, and angles as well as computed spectroscopic parameters resulted in good agreement with experimental data for corresponding synthetic complexes and with metal site regions of several copper(I)-proteins. These data help in interpreting structural data of complex biological systems and in constructing reliable force fields for molecular mechanics computations.     

A novel cis-push–pull effect in cycloruthenated azobenzene thiocarbonyl-containing complexes: crystal and molecular structures of [RuX(CS)(η-C,N-C6H4N=NPh)(PPh3)2](X=Cl, I)

Treatment of [RuHCl(CS)(PPh₃)₃] with Hg(o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)₂ affords [RuCl(CS)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂] (1) in good yield, where the cyclometallated azobenzene ligand coordinates through an ortho-C and one azo-N to give a five-membered chelate ring. Reaction of 1 with AgNO₃ followed by NaBr or NaI affords the chloride-exchanged products [RuX(CO)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄N=NC₆H₅)(PPh₃)₂] (2, 3), whereas reaction of 1 with AgOC(O)Me or NaS₂CNEt₂·2H₂O gives the halide mono-phosphine-substituted complexes [Ru(CS)(LL)(η²C,N-o-C₆H₄NNC₆H₅)(PPh₃)] (4, 5). In the solid-state structures of 1 and 3 there are significant changes in the bond lengths for the cyclometallated azobenzene ligand are observed relative to free azobenzene. These are discussed, with the aid of spectroscopic and crystallographic data, in terms of a cis-push–pull effect.     

Synthesis,Spectroscopy, X‐ray Crystallography,and DFT Computations of Nanosized Phosphazenes

Nanoparticles of nine phosphazenes with general formula 4‐CH₃C₆H₄S(O)₂N=PX₃ [X = Cl ( A ), NC₄H₈ ( 1 ), NC₆H₁₂ ( 2 ), NC₄H₈N–C(O)OC₂H₅ ( 3 ), NC₄H₈N–C(O)OC₆H₅ ( 4 ), NC₄H₈O ( 5 ), NHCH₂–C₄H₇O ( 6 ), N(CH₃)(C₆H₁₁) ( 7 ), NHCH₂–C₆H₅ ( 8 ), and 2‐NH‐NC₅H₄ ( 9 )] were synthesized using ultrasonic method and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, FT‐IR, fluorescence, as well as UV/Vis spectroscopy and additionally with XRD, FE‐SEM, N₂ sorption, and elemental analysis. The ³¹P NMR spectra of compounds 1 – 9 reveal the most up field shift δ(³¹P) for 9 at –11.45 ppm reflecting the most electron donation of 2‐aminopyridinyl rings through resonance to the phosphorus atom. The ¹H, ¹³C NMR spectra of 7 exhibit two sets of signals for the hydrogen and carbon atoms of its two isomers present in the solution state in 1:4 ratio. The FE‐SEM micrographs illustrate that the nanoparticles of compounds 1 – 9 have spherical morphology and a size of 27–42 nm. From the XRD patterns, the crystal sizes were estimated to about 24–86 nm. The highest bandgap was measured for 3 (3.81 eV) whereas the smallest was measured for 8 (3.50 eV). The structures of two polymorphs of compound 5 ( 5 , 5′ ) were determined by X‐ray crystallography at 120 K. Both of these polymorphs are triclinic with P1 space group but 5 has a doubled unit cell volume and two symmetrically independent molecules ( 5a and 5b ). In structures 5a and 5′ , the phosphorus and all endocyclic atoms of two morpholinyl rings display disorder, whereas the molecule 5b does not show disorder. The strong intermolecular O–H ··· O hydrogen bonds plus weak intermolecular C–H ··· O and C–H ··· N interactions create three‐dimensional polymers in the crystalline networks of 5 and 5′ . The DFT computations illustrate that molecule 5b is more stable than 5a by –1.1062 and –0.9779 kcal · mol^–1 at B3LYP and B3PW91 levels, respectively. The NBO calculations presented sp³d hybridization for phosphorus and sulfur atoms and sp², sp³ hybrids for the nitrogen and oxygen atoms.     

Synthese,Struktur und Photochemie von Olefiniridium(I)‐Komplexen mit Acetylacetonatoliganden

Synthesis, Structure, and Photochemical Behavior of Olefine Iridium(I) Complexes with Acetylacetonato Ligands The bis(ethene) complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 1 ) reacts with tertiary phosphanes to give the monosubstitution products [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)(PR₃)] ( 2 – 5 ). While 2 (R = iPr) is inert toward PiPr₃, the reaction of 2 with diphenylacetylene affords the π‐alkyne complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂Ph₂)(PiPr₃)] ( 6 ). Treatment of [IrCl(C₂H₄)₄] with C‐functionalized acetylacetonates yields the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 8 , 9 ), which react with PiPr₃ to give [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)(PiPr₃)] ( 10 , 11 ) by displacement of one ethene ligand. UV irradiation of 5 (PR₃ = iPr₂PCH₂CO₂Me) and 11 (R² = (CH₂)₃CO₂Me) leads, after addition of PiPr₃, to the formation of the hydrido(vinyl)iridium(III) complexes 7 and 12 . The reaction of 2 with the ethene derivatives CH₂=CHR (R = CN, OC(O)Me, C(O)Me) affords the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acac)(CH₂=CHR)(PiPr₃)] ( 13 – 15 ), which on photolysis in the presence of PiPr₃ also undergo an intramolecular C–H activation. In contrast, the analogous complexes [Ir(κ²‐acac)(olefin)(PiPr₃)] (olefin = (E)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 16 , (Z)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 17 ) are photochemically inert.     

Synthesis, X-ray studies, spectroscopic characterization and DFT calculations of p-tolylimido rhenium(V) complexes bearing an imidazole-based ligand

Novel p-tolylimido rhenium(V) complexes [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)X₂(hpb)(PPh₃)] and [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)(hpb)₂(PPh₃)]X (X = Cl, Br) have been obtained in the reactions of [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)X₃(PPh₃)₂] with 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-1H-benzimidazole (Hhpb). The compounds were identified by elemental analysis IR, UV-Vis spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. The electronic structures of the complex [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)Cl₂(hpb)(PPh₃)] and the cation [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)(hpb)₂(PPh₃)]⁺ have been calculated with the density functional theory (DFT) method. Additional information about binding in the [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)Cl₂(hpb)(PPh₃)] and [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)(hpb)₂(PPh₃)]⁺ has been obtained by NBO analysis. The electronic spectra of [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)Cl₂(hpb)(PPh₃)] and [Re(p-NC₆H₄CH₃)(hpb)₂(PPh₃)]Cl were investigated at the TDDFT level employing B3LYP functional in combination with LANL2DZ.     

Transition metal catalyzed alternating copolymerizations of olefins and co

Well defined Pd(II) catalysts of the type (N′N)Pd(CH₃)(Solv.)⁺ B(Ar_f)₄- (Ar_f = −3, 5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) have been prepared for living alternating copolymerizations of olefins with CO. This talk will focus on the mechanistic details of chain growth as elucidated by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, model studies of key migratory insertion steps and synthesis and properties of various copolymers and block copolymers based on styrenes, CH₂=CHC₆H₄X [X = p-C(CH₃)₃, p-OC(O)CH₃, p-OC(O)C-t-Bu), p-NHC(O)(C-t-Bu)]. Use of the catalysts based on the C₂ symmetric, homochiral ligand 2, 2'-bis[2-[4(S)-(Alkyl)-1, 3-oxazolinyl]]propane [Alkyl = CH₃, CH(CH₃)₂] produces a copolymer, 1, with a highly isotactic microstructure and high optical activity in contrast to achiral ligands such as 1,10-phenanthroline which produce copolymers with predominantly syndiotactic microstructure.     

Synthesis and Spectroscopic Study of Some New Phosphoramidates,Crystal Structures of N‐Benzoyl‐N′,N″‐bis(azetidinyl)phosphoric Triamide and N‐Benzoyl‐N′,N″‐bis(hexamethylenyl)phosphoric Triamide

Some new N‐carbonyl, phosphoramidates with formula C₆H₅C(O)N(H)P(O)R₂ (R = NC₃H₆ ( 1 ), NC₆H₁₂ ( 2 ), NHCH₂CH=CH₂ ( 3 ), N(C₃H₇)₂ ( 4 )) and CCl₃C(O)N(H)P(O)R′₂ (R′ = NC₃H₆ ( 5 ), NHCH₂CH=CH₂ ( 6 )) were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR and IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures were determined for compounds 1 and 2 . Compound 1 exists as two crystallographically independent molecules in crystal lattice. Both compounds 1 and 2 produced dimeric aggregates via intermolecular ‐P=O…H‐N‐ hydrogen bonds, which in compound 2 is a centrosymmetric dimer. In compounds with four‐membered ring amine groups, ³J(P,C)>²J(P,C), in agreement with our previous studies about five‐membered ring amine groups. Also, ³J(P,C) values in compounds 1 and 5 are greater than in compounds with five‐, six‐ and seven‐membered ring amine groups.     

The Influence of Substituents at C2 Carbon Atom of Thiosemicarbazones {R(H)C2=N3‐N2(H)‐C1(=S)‐N1H2} on their Dentacy in PtII/PdII Complexes: Synthesis,Spectroscopy, and Crystal Structures

The coordination chemistry of platinum(II) with a series of thiosemicarbazones {R(H)C²=N³‐N²(H)‐C¹(=S)‐N¹H₂, R = 2‐hydroxyphenyl, H₂stsc; pyrrole, H₂ptsc; phenyl, Hbtsc} is described. Reactions of trans‐PtCl₂(PPh₃)₂ precursor with H₂stsc (or H₂ptsc) in 1 : 1 molar ratio in the presence of Et₃N base yielded complexes, [Pt(η³‐ O, N³, S‐stsc)(PPh₃)] ( 1 ) and [Pt(η³‐ N⁴, N³, S‐ptsc)(PPh₃)] ( 2 ), respectively. Further, trans‐PtCl₂(PPh₃)₂ and Hbtsc in 1 : 2 (M : L) molar ratio yielded a different compound, [Pt(η²‐ N³, S‐btsc)(η¹‐S‐btsc)(PPh₃)] ( 3 ). Complex 1 involved deprotonation of hydrazinic (‐N²H‐) and hydroxyl (‐OH) groups, and stsc^2? is coordinating via O, N³, S donor atoms, while complex 2 involved deprotonation of hydrazinic (‐N²H‐) and ‐N⁴H groups and ptsc^2? is probably coordinating via N⁴, N³, S donor atoms. Reaction of PdCl₂(PPh₃)₂ with Hbtsc‐Me {C₆H₅(CH₃)C²=N³‐N²(H)‐C¹(=S)‐N¹H₂} yielded a cyclometallated complex [Pd(η³‐C, N³, S‐btsc‐Me)(PPh₃)] ( 4 ). These complexes have been characterized with the help of analytical data, spectroscopic techniques {IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P), U.V} and single crystal X‐ray crystallography ( 1 , 3 and 4 ). The effects of substituents at C² carbon of thiosemicarbazones on their dentacy and cyclometallation are emphasized.     

Synthese und strukturelle Studien von Aluminiumdialkylaminen und ‐amiden: N‐Chiralität von (CH3)3AlNHRR′ und cis‐trans‐Isomerie an X2AlNRR′ (X = CH3, Cl,H)

Synthesis and Structural Studies of Aluminum Dialkylamines and Dialkylamides: N‐Chirality of (CH₃)₃AlNHRR′ and cis‐trans ‐Isomerism at X₂AlNRR′ (X = CH₃, Cl, H) Aluminum dialkylamines and dialkylamides were prepared from Al(CH₃)₃ and NH(CH₃)R′ (R′: –C₂H₅, –^tC₄H₉) and characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ²⁷Al‐NMR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of [(CH₃)₂AlN(CH₃)(–^tC₄H₉)]₂ ( IV ), [Cl₂AlN(CH₃)(C₂H₅)]₂ ( V ), and [H₂AlN(CH₃)(C₂H₅)]_∞ ( VI‐trans and VI‐cis ) are discussed.     

Comparative Study of Phosphine and N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Stabilized Group 13 Adducts [L(EH3)] and [L2(E2Hn)]

Quantum chemical calculations using density functional theory at the BP86/TZ2P level have been carried out to determine the geometries and stabilities of Group 13 adducts [(PMe₃)(EH₃)] and [(PMe₃)₂(E₂H_n)] (E=B–In; n=4, 2, 0). The optimized geometries exhibit, in most cases, similar features to those of related adducts [(NHC^Me)(EH₃)] and [(NHC^Me)₂(E₂H_n)] with a few exceptions that can be explained by the different donor strengths of the ligands. The calculations show that the carbene ligand L=NHC^Me (:C(NMeCH)₂) is a significantly stronger donor than L=PMe₃. The equilibrium geometries of [L(EH₃)] possess, in all cases, a pyramidal structure, whereas the complexes [L₂(E₂H₄)] always have an antiperiplanar arrangement of the ligands L. The phosphine ligands in [(PMe₃)₂(B₂H₂)], which has C_s symmetry, are in the same plane as the B₂H₂ moiety, whereas the heavier homologues [(PMe₃)₂(E₂H₂)] (E=Al, Ga, In) have C_i symmetry in which the ligands bind side‐on to the E₂H₂ acceptor. This is in contrast to the [(NHC^Me)₂(E₂H₂)] adducts for which the NHC^Me donor always binds in the same plane as E₂H₂ except for the indium complex [(NHC^Me)₂(In₂H₂)], which exhibits side‐on bonding. The boron complexes [L₂(B₂)] (L=PMe₃ and NHC^Me) possess a linear arrangement of the LBBL moiety, which has a B?B triple bond. The heavier homologues [L₂(E₂)] have antiperiplanar arrangements of the LEEL moieties, except for [(PMe₃)₂(In₂)], which has a twisted structure in which the PInInP torsion angle is 123.0°. The structural features of the complexes [L(EH₃)] and [L₂(E₂H_n)] can be explained in terms of donor–acceptor interactions between the donors L and the acceptors EH₃ and E₂H_n, which have been analyzed quantitatively by using the energy decomposition analysis (EDA) method. The calculations predict that the hydrogenation reaction of the dimeric magnesium(I) compound L′MgMgL′ with the complexes [L(EH₃)] is energetically more favorable for L=PMe₃ than for NHC^Me.