On the weight-spectrum of a compact space

The weight-spectrumSp(w, X) of a spaceX is the set of weights of all infinite closed subspaces ofX. We prove that ifκ>ω is regular andX is compactT ₂ withω(X)≥κ then some λ withκ≤λ≤2^<κ is inSp(ω, X). Under CH this implies that the weight spectrum of a compact space can not omitω ₁, and thus solves problem 22 of [M]. Also, it is consistent with 2^ω=c being anything it can be that every countable closed setT of cardinals less thanc withω ∈ T satisfiesSp(w, X)=T for some separable compact LOTSX. This shows the independence from ZFC of a conjecture made in [AT]. Research supported by OTKA grant no. 1908.     

Chang’s conjecture for ℵω

We establish, starting from some assumptions of the order of magnitude of a huge cardinal, the consistency of (ℵ_ω+1,ℵ_ω)↠(ω₁,ω₀), as well as of some other transfer properties of the type (κ⁺,κ)↠(α⁺,α), where κ is singular.     

Finite combinations of Baire numbers

Letκ be a regular cardinal. Consider the Bair numbers of the spaces (2^θ)κ for variousθ≥κ. Letl be the number of such different Baire numbers. Models of set theory withl=1 orl=2 are known and it is also known thatl is finite. We show here that ifκ>ω, thenl could be any given finite number.     

Instances of the Conjecture of Chang

We consider various forms of the Conjecture of Chang. Part A constitutes an introduction. Donder and Koepke have shown that if ρ is a cardinal such that ρ ≧ ω₁, and (ρ⁺⁺,ρ⁺↠(ρ⁺, ρ), then 0⁺ exists. We obtain the same conclusion in Part B starting from some other forms of the transfer hypothesis. As typical corollaries, we get: Theorem A.Assume that there exists cardinals λ, κ, such that λ ≧ K ⁺ ≧ω₂ and (λ⁺, λ)↠(K ⁺,K. Then 0⁺ exists. Theorem B.Assume that there exists a singularcardinal κ such that(K ⁺,K↠(ω₁, ω₀. Then 0⁺ exists. Theorem C.Assume that (λ ⁺⁺, λ). Then 0⁺ exists (also ifK=ω ₀. Remark. Here, as in the paper of Donder and Koepke, “O⁺ exists” is a matter of saying that the hypothesis is strictly stronger than “L(μ) exists”. Of course, the same proof could give a few more sharps overL(μ), but the interest is in expecting more cardinals, coming from a larger core model. Theorem D.Assume that (λ ⁺⁺, λ)↠(K ⁺, K) and thatK≧ω ₁. Then 0⁺ exists. Remark 2. Theorem B is, as is well-known, false if the hypothesis “κ is singular” is removed, even if we assume thatK≧ω ₂, or that κ is inaccessible. We shall recall this in due place. Comments. Theorem B and Remark 2 suggest we seek the consistency of the hypothesis of the form:K ⁺, K↠(ω_n +1, ω_n), for κ singular andn≧0. 0266 0152 V 3 The consistency of several statements of this sort—a prototype of which is (N _ω+1,N _ω)↠(ω₁, ω₀) —have been established, starting with an hypothesis slightly stronger than: “there exists a huge cardinal”, but much weaker than: “there exists a 2-huge cardinal”. These results will be published in a joint paper by M. Magidor, S. Shelah, and the author of the present paper.     

Resolvability and monotone normality

A space X is said to be κ-resolvable (resp., almost κ-resolvable) if it contains κ dense sets that are pairwise disjoint (resp., almost disjoint over the ideal of nowhere dense subsets). X is maximally resolvable if and only if it is Δ(X)-resolvable, where Δ(X) = min{|G| : G ≠ open}. We show that every crowded monotonically normal (in short: MN) space is ω-resolvable and almost μ-resolvable, where μ = min{2 ^ω , ω ₂}. On the other hand, if κ is a measurable cardinal then there is a MN space X with Δ(X) = κ such that no subspace of X is ω ₁-resolvable. Any MN space of cardinality < ℵ _ω is maximally resolvable. But from a supercompact cardinal we obtain the consistency of the existence of a MN space X with |X| = Δ(X) = ℵ _ω such that no subspace of X is ω ₂-resolvable. The preparation of this paper was supported by OTKA grant no. 61600     

On dualL 1-spaces and injective bidual Banach spaces

In a previous paper (Israel J. Math.28 (1977), 313–324), it was shown that for a certain class of cardinals τ,l ¹(τ) embeds in a Banach spaceX if and only ifL ¹([0, 1]^τ) embeds inX ^*. An extension (to a rather wider class of cardinals) of the basic lemma of that paper is here applied so as to yield an affirmative answer to a question posed by Rosenthal concerning dual ℒ₁-spaces. It is shown that ifZ ^* is a dual Banach space, isomorphic to a complemented subspace of anL ¹-space, and κ is the density character ofZ ^*, thenl ¹(κ) embeds inZ ^*. A corollary of this result is that every injective bidual Banach space is isomorphic tol ^∞(κ) for some κ. The second part of this article is devoted to an example, constructed using the continuum hypothesis, of a compact spaceS which carries a homogeneous measure of type ω₁, but which is such thatl ¹(ω₁) does not embed in ℰ(S). This shows that the main theorem of the already mentioned paper is not valid in the case τ = ω₁. The dual space ℰ(S)^* is isometric to , and is a member of a new isomorphism class of dualL ¹-spaces.     

More on countably compact,locally countable spaces

Following [5], aT ₃ spaceX is called good (splendid) if it is countably compact, locally countable (andω-fair).G(κ) (resp.S(κ)) denotes the statement that a good (resp. splendid) spaceX with |X|=κ exists. We prove here that (i) Con(ZF)→Con(ZFC+MA+2 ^ω is big+S(κ) holds unlessω=cf(κ)<κ); (ii) a supercompact cardinal implies Con(ZFC+MA+2suω>_ω+₁+┐G(ω_ω+₁); (iii) the “Chang conjecture” (ω_ω+₁),→(ω ₁,ω) implies ┐S(κ) for allκ≧k≧ω_ω; (iv) ifP addsω ₁ dominating reals toV iteratively then, in , we haveG(λ^ω) for allλ. Research supported by Hungarian National Foundation for Scientific Research grant no. 1805.     

Exponents of someN-compact spaces

For any topological spaceT, S. Mrówka has defined Exp (T) to be the smallest cardinal κ (if any such cardinals exist) such thatT can be embedded as a closed subset of the productN ^κ of κ copies ofN (the discrete space of cardinality ℵ₀). We prove that forQ, the space of the rationals with the inherited topology, Exp (Q) is equal to a certain covering number, and we show that by modifying some earlier work of ours it can be seen that it is consistent with the usual axioms of set theory including the choice that this number equal any uncountable regular cardinal less than or equal to 2^ℵ ₀. Mrówka has also defined and studied the class ℳ={κ: Exp (N _κ)=κ} whereN _κ is the discrete space of cardinality κ. It is known that the first cardinal not in ℳ must not only be inaccessible but cannot even belong to any of the first ω Mahlo classes. However, it is not known whether every cardinal below 2^ℵ ₀ is contained in ℳ. We prove that if there exists a maximal family of almost-disjoint subsets ofN of cardinality κ, then κ∈ℳ, and we then use earlier work to prove that if it is consistent that there exist cardinals which are not in the first ω Mahlo classes, then it is consistent that there exist such cardinals below 2^ℵ ₀ and that ℳ nevertheless contain all cardinals no greater than 2^ℵ ₀. Finally, we consider the relationship between ℳ and certain “large cardinals”, and we prove, for example, that if μ is any normal measure on a measurable cardinal, then μ(ℳ)=0.     

The Lindel?f number of Cp(X)×Cp(X) for strongly zero-dimensional X

We prove that if X is a strongly zero-dimensional space, then for every locally compact second-countable space M, C _p (X, M) is a continuous image of a closed subspace of C _p (X). It follows in particular, that for strongly zero-dimensional spaces X, the Lindel?f number of C _p (X)×C _p (X) coincides with the Lindel?f number of C _p (X). We also prove that l(C _p (X ⁿ )^κ) ≤ l(C _p (X)^κ) whenever κ is an infinite cardinal and X is a strongly zero-dimensional union of at most κcompact subspaces.     

Strong Arens irregularity of Beurling algebras with a locally convex topology

Let G be a locally compact group with a weight function ω. Recently, we have shown that the Banach space L₀^∞ (G,1/ω) can be identified with the strong dual of L¹(G, ω)equipped with some locally convex topologies τ. Here we use this duality to introduce an Arens multiplication on (L¹(G, ω), τ)**, and prove that the topological center of (L¹(G, ω), τ)** is (L¹(G, ω); this enables us to conclude that (L¹(G, ω), τ) is Arens regular if and only if G is discrete. We also give a characterization for Arens regularity of L₀^∞ (G, 1/ω)¹. Received: 8 March 2005     

Maximal subspaces for solutions of the second order abstract cauchy problem

For a continuous, increasing function ω: R → R \{0} of finite exponential type, this paper introduces the set Z(A, ω) of all x in a Banach space X for which the second order abstract differential equation (2) has a mild solution such that [ω(t)]-1u(t,x) is uniformly continues on R , and show that Z(A, ω) is a maximal Banach subspace continuously embedded in X, where A ∈ B(X) is closed. Moreover, A|z(A,ω) generates an O(ω(t))strongly continuous cosine operator function family.     

Maxwell equations and the direction of the electromagnetic field

Let M₀ be the Minkowski space, let Λ₂(M₀) be the space of bivectors in M₀, and let G¹ ⊂ Λ₂(M₀) be the manifold of directions of the physical space, consisting of simple bivectors with square −1. A mapping F: U → Λ₂(M₀), U ⊂ ℝ⁴, satisfying the Maxwell equations is regarded as the tensor of an electromagnetic field in vacuum. The field is described on the basis of a special decomposition F = eω + h(*ω), where the mapping ω: U → G¹ is called the direction of the field, and e: U → (0, +∞) and h: U → ℝ are the electric and magnetic coefficients of the field. The Maxwell equations are reformulated in terms of ω, e, and h. Electromagnetic fields whose set of directions is a point or a one-dimensional subset of G¹ are considered. Bibliography: 7 titles. __________ Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 329, 2005, pp. 118–146.     

Characterizations of finite groups by sets of orders of their elements

For a finite group G, ω(G) denotes the set of orders of its elements. If ω is a subset of the set of natural numbers, h(ω) stands for the number of pairwise nonisomorphic finite groups G for which ω(G)=ɛ. We prove that h(ω(G))=1, if G is isomorphic to S₉, S₁₁, S₁₂, S₁₃, or A₁₂, and h(ω(G))=2 if G is isomorphic to S₂(6) or to O ₈ ⁺ (2). 01 Supported by RFFR grant No. 96-01-01893. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 37–53, January–February, 1997.     

Recognition of the Projective Special Linear Group over GF（3）

Let P be a finite group and denote by w（P） the set of its element orders. P is called k-recognizable by the set of its element orders if for any finte group G with ω（G） =ω（P） there are, up to isomorphism, k finite groups G such that G ≌P. In this paper we will prove that the group Lp（3）, where p 〉 3 is a prime number, is at most 2-recognizable.     

Adjoint bi-continuous semigroups and semigroups on the space of measures

For a given bi-continuous semigroup (T(t)) _t⩾0 on a Banach space X we define its adjoint on an appropriate closed subspace X° of the norm dual X′. Under some abstract conditions this adjoint semigroup is again bi-continuous with respect to the weak topology σ(X°,X). We give the following application: For Ω a Polish space we consider operator semigroups on the space C_b(Ω) of bounded, continuous functions (endowed with the compact-open topology) and on the space M(Ω) of bounded Baire measures (endowed with the weak*-topology). We show that bi-continuous semigroups on M(Ω) are precisely those that are adjoints of bi-continuous semigroups on C_b(Ω). We also prove that the class of bi-continuous semigroups on C_b(ω) with respect to the compact-open topology coincides with the class of equicontinuous semigroups with respect to the strict topology. In general, if is not a Polish space this is not the case.     

Chains of baire class 1 functions and various notions of special trees

Following Laczkovich we consider the partially ordered setB ₁(ℝ) of Baire class 1 functions endowed with the pointwise order, and investigate the order types of the linearly ordered subsets. Answering a question of Komjáth and Kunen we show (inZFC) that special Aronszajn lines are embeddable intoB ₁(ℝ). We also show that under Martin's Axiom a linearly ordered set ℒ with |ℒ| < 2^ω is embeddable intoB ₁(ℝ) iff ℒ does not contain a copy of ω₁ or ω _* ¹ . We present aZFC example of a linear order of size 2^ω showing that this characterisation is not valid for orders of size continuum. These results are obtained using the notion of a compact-special tree; that is, a tree that is embeddable into the class of compact subsets of the reals partially ordered under reverse inclusion. We investigate how this notion is related to the well-known notion of an ℝ-special tree and also to some other notions of specialness. Partially supported by Hungarian Scientific Foundation grant no. 37758, 49786 and F 43620. The second author's research for this paper was partially supported by NSERC of Canada.     

An extension theorem for separable Banach spaces

We construct a totally disconnected ω^*, norming subsetF of the unit ballB ^* of an arbitrary separable Banach space,X, and an operator fromC(F) toC(B^*) that “amost” commutes with the natural embeddings ofX. This is used to give a new proof of Milutin's theorem and to prove some new results on complemented subspaces ofC[0, 1] with separable dual. In particular we show that a complemented subspace ofC(ω^ω), is either isomorphic toC(ω^ω) or toc _u.     

Recognition of finite groups by a set of orders of their elements

For G a finite group, ω(G) denotes the set of orders of elements in G. If ω is a subset of the set of natural numbers, h(ω) stands for the number of nonisomorphic groups G such that ω(G)=ω. We say that G is recognizable (by ω(G)) if h(ω(G))=1. G is almost recognizable (resp., nonrecognizable) if h(ω(G)) is finite (resp., infinite). It is shown that almost simple groups PGL_n(q) are nonrecognizable for infinitely many pairs (n, q). It is also proved that a simple group S₄(7) is recognizable, whereas A₁₀, U₃(5), U₃(7), U₄(2), and U₅(2) are not. From this, the following theorem is derived. Let G be a finite simple group such that every prime divisor of its order is at most 11. Then one of the following holds: (i) G is isomorphic to A₅, A₇, A₈, A₉, A₁₁, A₁₂, L₂(q), q=7, 8, 11, 49, L₃(4), S₄(7), U₄(3), U₆(2), M₁₁, M₁₂, M₂₂, HS, or M^cL, and G is recognizable by the set ω(G); (ii) G is isomorphic to A₆, A₁₀, U₃(3), U₄(2), U₅(2), U₃(5), or J₂, and G is nonrecognizable; (iii) G is isomorphic to S₆(2) or O ₈ ⁺ (2), and h(ω(G))=2. Supported by RFFR grant No. 96-01-01893. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 651–666, November–December, 1998.     

Uncountable admissibles II: Compactness

AssumeV=L. Let κ be a cardinal and forX⊆κ, n<ω let α _n (X) denote the least ordinal α such thatL _α[X] is Σ _n admissible. In our earlier paperUncountable admissibles I: forcing, we characterized those ordinals of the form σ _n (X) when κ is regular. This paper treats the singular case using Barwise compactness, an effective version of Jensen's covering lemma and β-recursion theory.