The insertion of cycloheptatriene and cyclohepta-1,3-diene into the RuH bond of RuHCl(PPh3)3 to give Ru(η5-C7H9)Cl(PPh3)2 and Ru(η3-C7H11)Cl(PPh3)2

RuHCl(PPh₃)₃ reacts quantitatively with cycloheptatriene in CH₂Cl₂ at 35°C in 15 min to give Ru(η⁵-C₇H₉)Cl(PPh₃)₂ and PPh₃. The major isomer adopts a conformation with inequivalent phosphorus ligands and no plane of symmetry through the C₇H₉ ligand, but rapid intramolecular scrambling with δG³ = 10.6 kcal mol⁻¹ results in an averaged ¹H, ¹³C, and ³¹P NMR spectrum at room temperature. RuHCl(PPh₃)₃ reacts with cyclohepta-1,3-diene to give initially Ru(η³-C₇H₁₁)Cl(PPh₃)₂, but in a subsequent reaction this is dehydrogenated to give Ru(η⁵-C₇H₉)Cl(PPh₃)₂.     

Conformational analysis and x-ray crystal structure of [(η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)(PPh3)CH2CH3]

The complex [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)(PPh₃)CH₂CH₃] is shown by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and an X-ray crystal structure analysis to adopt a single conformation with the methyl group residing between the cyclopentadienyl and carbon monoxide ligands.     

Crystal structure of twinned (η5-C5(CH3)4CF3) (η5-C5(CH3)5)Ru

The substituted sandwich complex crystallizes in monoclinic space groupP2₁/m withZ=2. Twinning to the (001) direction with the special conditionc ^*/4a ^* = cos ^* causes systematic superposition of the reciprocal lattices of both domains and results in an apparent unit cell with double volume and the reflection condition (2h)kl, l=2n. The structure solution was obtained with the subset of intensity data for the predominant individuum and converged atR = 0.040,R _w =0.046 for 832 independent observations and 122 variables. The molecules show disorder with respect to the crystallographic mirror plane. The structure is closely related to that of decamethylruthenocene.     

Heteronuclear (WFe) and homonuclear (FeFE) μ-alkylidene complexes of transition metals from mononuclear terminal carbene complexes. crystal structures of {WFe[μ-η1, η3-C(OCH2CH3)(CHCHCH3](CO)8} and [fe2{μ-η2,η3-C[OCH2CH3[CHC(OCH2CH3)(CH3]}(CO)6

The reactions of mononuclear carbene complexes of W and Fe of the type CO)_mMC(OR)(CH_2nCHCR′″ (M  = FE, W; m = 4 and 5; n = 0, 2, 3; R′, R″ = C, CH₃, OEt) with Fe(CO)₅ have been studied. In all cases the reaction leads to new hetero (WFe) or homo (FeFe) μ-alkylidene complexes, the position of the double bond depending strongly on n.     

Insertions of nitriles and pyridine into the ZrSi bond of (η5-C5H5)(η5-C5Me5)Zr[Si(SiMe3)3]Me

The zirconium silyl complex CpCpZr[Si(SiMe₃)₃]Me (1; Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅; Cp = η⁵-C₅Me₅) reacts with nitriles RCN (R = Me, CHCH₂, Ph) to form the azomethine derivatives CpCpZr[NC(R)Si(SiMe₃)₃]Me (2, R = Me; 3, R = CHCH₂; 4, R = Ph). Pyridine reacts with 1 to give a 75% yield of CpCpZr[NC₅H₅Si(SiMe₃)₃]Me (5), which results from 1,2-addition of the ZrSi bond of 1 to pyridine. These reactions provide the first examples of nitrile and pyridine insertions into a transition metal-silicon bond. The related silyl complexes Cp₂Zr[Si(SiMe₃)₃]Me and CpCpZr[Si(SiMe₃)₃]Cl are much less reactive toward nitriles and pyridine.     

Ligand-centred coupling of the alkynyl radical cations [Mo(CCR)(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)(η-C7H7)]+ (R = Ph or Bun: crystal structure of the dimeric product [Mo2(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)2(η-C7H7)2(μ-C4R2)][PF6]2 (R = Ph)

The radical cations [Mo(CCR)(dppe)(η-C₇H₇)]⁺ (R = Ph or Buⁿ); dppe = Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) undergo coupling at C_β of the alkynyl ligand to afford the divinylidene-bridged, dimeric products [Mo₂(dppe)₂(η-C₇H₇)₂(μ-C₄R₂)]²⁺, characterised crystallographically for R = Ph.     

Organometallic polymorphism. Synthesis and structural characterization of two forms of [Ru(η6-C6H6)(η6-C6H4(CH3)COOCH3)][BF4]2 and the phase transition in [Ru(η5-C5H5)(η6-C6H5OH)][PF6]

The synthesis and structural characterization of the complex [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₆)(η⁶-C₆H₄(CH₃)COOCH₃)] [BF₄]₂ (2) and of its precursor [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₄(CH₃)COOCH₃)Cl₂]₂ (1) are reported. Compound (2) has been characterized in two polymorphic modifications (2a and 2b) and the molecular organization in the solid state has been investigated. The complex [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(η⁶-C₆H₅OH)][PF₆] (3) has also been investigated; it has been shown to possess a disorder similar to that observed in the high temperature phase of related systems such as [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(η⁶-C₆H₆)][PF₆].     

Reaction of alkyne cluster Os3(μ-CO)(CO)9(μ3-η1:η1:η2-Me3SiC2Me) with HC≡CCOOMe. Molecular and crystal structures of Os3(CO)9{μ3-η1:η1:η2:η2-C(SiMe3)C(Me)C(COOMe)CH× and Os3(CO)8{μ3-η1:η1:η4:η1-C(SiMe3)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)CH× complexes

Reaction of the cluster Os₃(μ-CO)(CO)₉(μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²-Me₃SiC₂Me) with HC≡CCOOMe in benzene at 70 °C results in Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(COOMe)CH× (5), Os₃(CO)₉{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η²:η²-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)CH× (6), Os₃(CO)₉{μ-η¹:η¹:η⁴-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)CH× (7), and Os₃(CO)_δ{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η⁴:η¹-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)× complexes (8), containing an osmacyclopentadiene moiety. Complexes5–8 were characterized by¹H NMR and IR spectroscopy. The structure of clusters5 and8 was confirmed by X-ray analysis. Complex7 is formed from cluster5 as a result of a new intramolecular rearrangement and complex8 is obtained by decarbonylation of compound6. Complex8 adds PPh₃ to give Os₃(CO)_δ(PPh₃){μ-η¹:η¹:η⁴-C(SiMe₃)C(Me)C(H)C(COOMe)×.     

The stereoselective reaction of sodium cyanide with the cationic ruthenium vinylidene complex [(η5-C5H5)(PMe3)2RuCC(Me)Ph]+

The reaction of sodium cyanide with [(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PMe₃)₂RuCC(Me)Ph]PF₆ (1) proceeds with high stereoselectivity (> 95 : 5) to give (Z)-(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PMe₃)₂RuC(CN)C(Me)Ph, which under acid conditions isomerises (< 5 : 95) to the E isomer.     

Syntheses,spectroscopic and structural studies of indenyl ruthenium complexes incorporating amine and nitrile ligands: molecular structures of [(η5-C9H7) Ru(η2-dppe)(CH3CN)]PF6 and [(η5-C9H7)Ru(η2-dppe)(NH3)]PF6

The reaction of [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(η²-dppe)Cl] (1) with monodentate nitriles, (L) in the presence of NH₄PF₆ afforded the complexes [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(η²-dppe)(L)]PF₆, with L?=?CH₃CN (2a), CH₃CH=CHCN (2b), NCC₆H₄CN (2c), C₆H₅CH₂CN (2d), respectively. However, reaction of 1 with NH₄PF₆ in methanol yielded an amine complex of the type [(η⁵-C₉H₇) Ru(η²-dppe)(NH₃)]PF₆ (3a). The complexes were fully characterized by spectroscopy and analytical data. The molecular structures of the complexes [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(η²-dppe) (CH₃CN)]PF₆ (2a) and [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(η²-dppe)(NH₃)]PF₆ (3a) have been determined by single crystal X-ray analyses.     

Comparison of the Bonding of Benzene and C60 to a Metal Cluster: Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η 2,η2-C6H6) and Ru3(CO)9(μ3-η2,η2,η2-C60)

The electron distributions and bonding in Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆) and Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) are examined via electronic structure calculations in order to compare the nature of ligation of benzene and buckminsterfullerene to the common Ru₃(CO)₉ inorganic cluster. A fragment orbital approach, which is aided by the relatively high symmetry that these molecules possess, reveals important features of the electronic structures of these two systems. Reported crystal structures show that both benzene and C₆₀ are geometrically distorted when bound to the metal cluster fragment, and our ab initio calculations indicate that the energies of these distortions are similar. The experimental Ru–C_fullerene bond lengths are shorter than the corresponding Ru–C_benzene distances and the Ru–Ru bond lengths are longer in the fullerene-bound cluster than for the benzene-ligated cluster. Also, the carbonyl stretching frequencies are slightly higher for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) than for Ru₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆H₆). As a whole, these observations suggest that electron density is being pulled away from the metal centers and CO ligands to form stronger Ru–C_fullerene than Ru–C_benzene bonds. Fenske-Hall molecular orbital calculations show that an important interaction is donation of electron density in the metal–metal bonds to empty orbitals of C₆₀ and C₆H₆. Bonds to the metal cluster that result from this interaction are the second highest occupied orbitals of both systems. A larger amount of density is donated to C₆₀ than to C₆H₆, thus accounting for the longer metal–metal bonds in the fullerene-bound cluster. The principal metal–arene bonding modes are the same in both systems, but the more band-like electronic structure of the fullerene (i.e., the greater number density of donor and acceptor orbitals in a given energy region) as compared to C₆H₆ permits a greater degree of electron flow and stronger bonding between the Ru₃(CO)₉ and C₆₀ fragments. Of significance to the reduction chemistry of M₃(CO)₉( ³- ², ², ²-C₆₀) molecules, the HOMO is largely localized on the metal–carbonyl fragment and the LUMO is largely localized on the C₆₀ portion of the molecule. The localized C₆₀ character of the LUMO is consistent with the similarity of the first two reductions of this class of molecules to the first two reductions of free C₆₀. The set of orbitals above the LUMO shows partial delocalization (in an antibonding sense) to the metal fragment, thus accounting for the relative ease of the third reduction of this class of molecules compared to the third reduction of free C₆₀.     

Optically active [(η-C5H5)Ru{(R)-Ph2PCH(CH3)CH2PPh2}(Olefin)]PF6 complexes: Influence of the stereogenic metal atom on the enantioface selection

The synthesis and characterization of optically active olefinic complexes of the type [(η-C₅H₅)Ru{Ph₂PCH(CH₃)CH₂PPh₂}(CH₂CHR″)]PF₆ (R″  H, CH₃, C₆H₅, COOCH₃), in which the metal is a stereogenic center, are reported. The enantioface discrimination of the prochiral olefin is influenced by the chiral ligand and by the stereogenic metal atom. The chiral center at the metal appears to be optically labile. The rates of the epimerization at the metal and of the olefin enantioface depend on the structure of the coordinated olefin.     

Regioselective permethylation,perallylation and perbenzylation of the arene ligand in [Ru(η5-C5Me5)(η6-C6Me6)][PF6]: a remarkable periodic effect

The reactions of [MCp^*(η⁶-C₆Me₆)][PF₆], M = Fe: 1, Ru: 2, Cp^* = η⁵-C₅Me₅, with KOH (in DME) or tert-BuOK (in THF) and methyl iodide, allyl bromide or benzyl bromide are regioselective on the arene ligand only for 2, giving the complexes [RuCp^*{η⁶-C₆(CH₂R)₆}][PF₆], R = methyl (3), allyl (4) or benzyl (5), although some formations of C-C bonds also occur on the Cp^* ligand in the case of the reactions of allyl and benzyl bromides. This contrasts with the complete lack of regioselectivity formerly observed with the iron analogue 1, and is best taken into account by the difference of steric effects which are less marked in 2 than in 1.     

[2 + 2] Photodimerization of the acenaphthylene ruthenium complex [(C5Me4CH2OMe)Ru(η6-C12H8)]+

The [2 + 2] photodimerization of the complex [(C₅Me₄CH₂OMe)Ru(η⁶-C₁₂H₈)]⁺ under visible-light irradiation leads to a mixture of the head-to-head heptacyclene products [(μ-η⁶: η⁶-C₂₄H₁₆)Ru₂(C₅Me₄CH₂OMe)₂]²⁺ (syn- and anti-) with the predominant formation of the syn-isomer; the structures of both isomers were established by X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Enantioselective synthesis: Catalysis of the aldol reaction by neutral gold(I)-chiral ferrocenylphosphine complexes. Crystal structure of the complex [{(η5-C5H4PPh2)(η5-C5H3(PPh2)CH(Me)N(Me)CH2CH2NMe2)Fe}2(AuCl)3] · Et2O

The chiral aminoferrocenylphosphine [(η⁵-C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵-C₅H₃(PPh₂)CH(CH₃)-N(CH₃)CH₂CH₂N(CH₃)₂)Fe] (1) reacts with (H₃C)₂SAuCl to give neutral gold(I) complexes that are active catalysts for the enantioselective coupling of isocyanoacetate esters with aldehydes, forming dihydrooxazoles. The structure of the trimeric complex [(rac-1)₂(AuCl)₃] · Et₂O has been determined by X-ray diffraction.     

Triphospha-Ferrocenes as Ligands. Crystal Structures of [Fe(η5-C5Me5)(η5-C2 TBu2P3)M(CO)5)], (M= Cr,MO, W) and the Novel ruthenium and Nickel Complexes [Fe(η5-C5Me5) (η5-C2 TBu2P3)Ru3(CO)9] and [Fe(η5-C5Me5)(η5-C2 tBu2P3)Ni(Co)2]2

Abstract

Syntheses and structures of penta- and hexaphosphorus analogues of ferrocene have been described recently¹. Unlike their simple ferrocene analogues, these complexes have further ligating potential towards other transition metal centres by virtue of the availability of the ring phosphorus lone-pair electrons that are not involved in the η⁵-coordination. We now describe the first examples of coordination compounds of the triphospha-ferrocene [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅) (η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃]. In the ruthenium complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃) Ru₃(CO)₉] ² two adjacent phosphorus atoms of the η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃ ring are interlinked by a ruthenium carbonyl cluster in which all three ruthenium atoms interact with the phosphorus atoms. The tetrametallic nickel complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃)Ni(CO)₂]₂ ³ represents the first example of intermolecular interlinkage of two phospha-ferrocene systems by two metal centres.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of (η5-Dp)Ru(PPh3)2H (Dp = C8H9−, 1,2-dihydropentalenyl)

Transition Metal Chemistry - (η5-Dp)Ru(PPh3)2H (Dp?=?C8H9?, 1,2-dihydropentalenyl) was synthesized in 90% yield by reaction of (η5-Dp)Ru(PPh3)2Cl with sodium formate....     

Formation and crystal structure of MeIr(CO)(PPh3)2(MeCO2CHCHCO2Me). Comparison of the structures of analogous alkene and alkyne complexes

The complex MeIr(CO)(PPh₃)₂(MeCO₂CHCHCO₂Me), synthesized from trans-MeIr(CO)(PPh₃)₂ and dimethyl maleate, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P2/n with a 13.997(5), b 17.878(5), c 15.709(4) Å, β 91.00(2)°, V 3930(2) ų and Z = 4. X-ray data (Mo-K_α, 2θ 4.5–45.0°) were collected with a Syntex P2₁ automated four-circle diffractometer; the structure was solved and converged with R 5.5% for all 5069 unique reflections and R 4.3% for those 4343 data with |F_o| > 3σ(|F_o|). The iridium(I) center has a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry with the Me and CO ligands occupying axial sites (Ir-Me(1) 2.159(8), IrCO 1.907(8) Å. The MeCO₂CHCHCO₂Me ligand is bonded in η² fashion to the iridium, with its coordinated double bond parallel to the equatorial plane. Bonds to the equatorial ligands are IrP(1) 2.344(2), Ir-P(2) 2.376(2) and Ir-(center of olefin) 2.017 Å. The observed ligand configuration is different from that for MeIr(CO)(PPh₃)₂(MeCO₂CCCO₂Me) which has axial Me and PPh₃ ligands in its thermodynamically stable isomer.     

Efficient Diastereoselective Synthesis of Chiral Diferrocenylphosphine‐diamines: X‐ray Crystal Structure of [(η5‐C5H5)Fe{(η5‐C5H3)PPh2CH(CH3) N(CH2)2(CH2)2NCH(CH3)PPh2 (η5‐C5H3)}Fe(η5‐C5H5)]

Abstract

Three novel chiral planar diferrocenylphosphine‐diamines 5 (a–c) were designed and synthesized starting with (s)‐(?)‐N,N‐dimethyl‐1‐ferrocenylethylamine‐1 [(S)‐1]. All new compounds were identified by ¹H NMR and MS. The structure of chiral diferrocenylphosphine‐diamine 5c was determined by X‐ray crystallography. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that the molecular structure of compound 5c [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe{(η⁵‐C₅H₃)PPh₂CH(CH₃) N(CH₂)₂(CH₂)₂NCH(CH₃)PPh₂‐(η⁵‐C₅H₃)}Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] is enantiomerically pure and crystallizes in the noncentrosymmetric P2(1)2(1)2(1) space group; it maintains “Z” shape and contains a piperazine hexahydrate ring bridge. The piperazine ring adopts a favored chair conformation and the chiral center C₂₃ and C₂₉ substituents in S‐configuration.