A sufficient condition for F-purity

It is well known that nice conditions on the canonical module of a local ring have a strong impact in the study of strong F-regularity and F  -purity. In this note, we prove that if (R,m)$(R,\mathfrak{m})$ is an equidimensional and _S2$S_2$ local ring that admits a canonical ideal I≅_ωR$I\cong {\omega }_R$ such that R/I$R/I$ is F-pure, then R is F-pure. This greatly generalizes one of the main theorems in [2]. We also provide examples to show that not all Cohen–Macaulay F-pure local rings satisfy the above property.     

Selections and their absolutely continuous invariant measures

Let I=[0,1]$I=[0,1]$ and let P be a partition of I   into a finite number of intervals. Let _τ1${\tau }_1$, _τ2${\tau }_2$; I→I$I\to I$ be two piecewise expanding maps on P  . Let G⊂I×I$G\subset I\times I$ be the region between the boundaries of the graphs of _τ1${\tau }_1$ and _τ2${\tau }_2$. Any map τ:I→I$\tau :I\to I$ that takes values in G is called a selection of the multivalued map defined by G  . There are many results devoted to the study of the existence of selections with specified topological properties. However, there are no results concerning the existence of selection with measure-theoretic properties. In this paper we prove the existence of selections which have absolutely continuous invariant measures (acim). By our assumptions we know that _τ1${\tau }_1$ and _τ2${\tau }_2$ possess acims preserving the distribution functions F⁽¹⁾$F^{(1)}$ and F⁽²⁾$F^{(2)}$. The main result shows that for any convex combination F   of F⁽¹⁾$F^{(1)}$ and F⁽²⁾$F^{(2)}$ we can find a map η   with values between the graphs of _τ1${\tau }_1$ and _τ2${\tau }_2$ (that is, a selection) such that F is the η-invariant distribution function. Examples are presented. We also study the relationship of the dynamics of our multivalued maps to random maps.     

Regularity for the fractional Gelfand problem up to dimension 7

We study the problem (−Δ)^su=λe^u${(-\mathrm{\Delta })}^{s}u=\lambda e^u$ in a bounded domain Ω⊂Rⁿ$\Omega \subset {\mathbb{R}}^n$, where λ   is a positive parameter. More precisely, we study the regularity of the extremal solution to this problem. Our main result yields the boundedness of the extremal solution in dimensions n≤7$n\le 7$ for all s∈(0,1)$s\in (0,1)$ whenever Ω   is, for every i=1,...,n$i=1,...,n$, convex in the _xi$x_i$-direction and symmetric with respect to {_xi=0}$\{x_i=0\}$. The same holds if n=8$n=8$ and s?0.28206...$s?0.28206...$, or if n=9$n=9$ and s?0.63237...$s?0.63237...$. These results are new even in the unit ball Ω=_B1$\Omega =B_1$.     

An approximation method for strictly pseudocontractive mappings

Let K$K$ be a closed convex subset of a q$q$-uniformly smooth separable Banach space, T:K→K$T:K\to K$ a strictly pseudocontractive mapping, and f:K→K$f:K\to K$ an L$L$-Lispschitzian strongly pseudocontractive mapping. For any t∈(0,1)$t\in (0,1)$, let _xt$x_t$ be the unique fixed point of tf+(1-t)T$\mathit{tf}+(1-t)T$. We prove that if T$T$ has a fixed point, then {_xt}$\{x_t\}$ converges to a fixed point of T$T$ as t$t$ approaches to 0.     

Disjoint paths in tournaments

Given k   pairs of vertices (_si,_ti)$(s_i,t_i)$(1≤i≤k)$(1\le i\le k)$ of a digraph G, how can we test whether there exist k   vertex-disjoint directed paths from _si$s_i$ to _ti$t_i$ for 1≤i≤k$1\le i\le k$? This is NP-complete in general digraphs, even for k=2$k=2$ [2], but for k=2$k=2$ there is a polynomial-time algorithm when G is a tournament (or more generally, a semicomplete digraph), due to Bang-Jensen and Thomassen [1]. Here we prove that for all fixed k there is a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the problem when G is semicomplete.     

The Dirichlet problem for the fractional Laplacian: Regularity up to the boundary

We study the regularity up to the boundary of solutions to the Dirichlet problem for the fractional Laplacian. We prove that if u   is a solution of (−Δ)^su=g${(-\mathrm{\Delta })}^{s}u=g$ in Ω  , u≡0$u\equiv 0$ in Rⁿ\Ω${\mathbb{R}}^n\backslash \Omega$, for some s∈(0,1)$s\in (0,1)$ and g∈L^∞(Ω)$g\in L^{\infty }(\Omega )$, then u   is C^s(Rⁿ)$C^s({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ and u/δ^s_|Ω$u/{\delta }^s{|}_{\Omega }$ is C^α$C^{\alpha }$ up to the boundary ∂Ω   for some α∈(0,1)$\alpha \in (0,1)$, where δ(x)=dist(x,∂Ω)$\delta (x)=\mathrm{dist}(x,\partial \Omega )$. For this, we develop a fractional analog of the Krylov boundary Harnack method.     

On the norming constants for normal maxima

Given n   independent standard normal random variables, it is well known that their maxima _Mn$M_n$ can be normalized such that their distribution converges to the Gumbel law. In a remarkable study, Hall proved that the Kolmogorov distance _dn$d_n$ between the normalized _Mn$M_n$ and its associated limit distribution is less than 3/log?n$3/\log ?n$. In the present study, we propose a different set of norming constants that allow this upper bound to be decreased with _dn≤C(m)/log?n$d_n\le C(m)/\log ?n$ for n≥m≥5$n\ge m\ge 5$. Furthermore, the function C(m)$C(m)$ is computed explicitly, which satisfies C(m)≤1$C(m)\le 1$ and _limm→∞?C(m)=1/3${\lim }_{m\to \infty }?C(m)=1/3$. As a consequence, some new and effective norming constants are provided using the asymptotic expansion of a Lambert W type function.     

Sur la répartition des puissances modulo 1

For almost all x>1$x>1$, (xⁿ)$(x^n)$(n=1,2,…)$(n=1,2,\dots )$ is equidistributed modulo 1, a classical result. What can be said on the exceptional set? It has Hausdorff dimension one. Much more: given an (b_n)$(b_n)$ in [0,1[$[0,1[$ and ε>0$\epsilon >0$, the x  -set such that |xⁿ−b_n|<ε$|x^n-b_n|<\epsilon$ modulo 1 for n   large enough has dimension 1. However, its intersection with an interval [1,X]$[1,X]$ has a dimension <1, depending on ε and X. Some results are given and a question is proposed.     

Poincaré series of modules over compressed Gorenstein local rings

Given two positive integers e and s we consider Gorenstein Artinian local rings R   whose maximal ideal m$\mathfrak{m}$ satisfies m^s≠0=m^s+1${\mathfrak{m}}^s\ne 0={\mathfrak{m}}^{s+1}$ and _rankR/m(m/m²)=e${\mathrm{rank}}_{R/\mathfrak{m}}(\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2)=e$. We say that R is a compressed Gorenstein local ring   when it has maximal length among such rings. It is known that generic Gorenstein Artinian algebras are compressed. If s≠3$s\ne 3$, we prove that the Poincaré series of all finitely generated modules over a compressed Gorenstein local ring are rational, sharing a common denominator. A formula for the denominator is given. When s is even this formula depends only on the integers e and s  . Note that for s=3$s=3$ examples of compressed Gorenstein local rings with transcendental Poincaré series exist, due to Bøgvad.     

Asymptotic expansions for elliptic-like regularizations of semilinear evolution equations

Consider in a real Hilbert space H the Cauchy problem (_P0$P_0$): u^′(t)+Au(t)+Bu(t)=f(t)$u^{\prime }(t)+Au(t)+Bu(t)=f(t)$, 0≤t≤T$0\le t\le T$; u(0)=_u0$u(0)=u_0$, where −A   is the infinitesimal generator of a _C0$C_0$-semigroup of contractions, B is a nonlinear monotone operator, and f is a given H-valued function. Inspired by the excellent book on singular perturbations by J.L. Lions, we associate with problem (_P0$P_0$) the following regularization (_Pε$P_{\epsilon }$): −εu^″(t)+u^′(t)+Au(t)+Bu(t)=f(t)$-\epsilon u^{″}(t)+u^{\prime }(t)+Au(t)+Bu(t)=f(t)$, 0≤t≤T$0\le t\le T$; u(0)=_u0$u(0)=u_0$, u^′(T)=_uT$u^{\prime }(T)=u_T$, where ε>0$\epsilon >0$ is a small parameter. We investigate existence, uniqueness and higher regularity for problem (_Pε$P_{\epsilon }$). Then we establish asymptotic expansions of order zero, and of order one, for the solution of (_Pε$P_{\epsilon }$). Problem (_Pε$P_{\epsilon }$) turns out to be regularly perturbed of order zero, and singularly perturbed of order one, with respect to the norm of C([0,T];H)$C([0,T];H)$. However, the boundary layer of order one is not visible through the norm of L²(0,T;H)$L^2(0,T;H)$.     

A converse of Loewner–Heinz inequality and applications to operator means

Let f(t)$f(t)$ be an operator monotone function. Then A?B$A?B$ implies f(A)?f(B)$f(A)?f(B)$, but the converse implication is not true. Let A?B$A?B$ be the geometric mean of A,B?0$A,B?0$. If A?B$A?B$, then B⁻¹?A?I$B^{-1}?A?I$; the converse implication is not true either. We will show that if f(λB+I)⁻¹?f(λA+I)?I$f{(\lambda B+I)}^{-1}?f(\lambda A+I)?I$ for all sufficiently small λ>0$\lambda >0$, then f(λA+I)?f(λB+I)$f(\lambda A+I)?f(\lambda B+I)$ and A?B$A?B$. Moreover, we extend it to multi-variable matrices means.