纤维素键合手性固定相拆分6种萘满酮衍生物对映体

使用Chiralpak IC（纤维素-三（3,5-二氯苯基氨基甲酸酯）共价键合硅胶）手性柱,建立了采用手性固定相高效液相色谱拆分6种 α -芳基萘满酮类衍生物对映体的方法。考察了流动相中有机改性剂的种类和比例、柱温和流速对对映体分离的影响。结果显示6种化合物在异丙醇为改性剂的条件下均可获得较高的对映体分离度。热力学研究表明6种化合物对映体的手性拆分过程均受焓驱动影响,且低温有利于对映体分离。最终推荐分离化合物Ⅰ对映体的流动相是正己烷-异丙醇（90：10,v/v）;分离化合物Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ对映体的流动相是正己烷-异丙醇（99：1,v/v）;分离化合物Ⅴ对映体的流动相是正己烷-异丙醇（85：15,v/v）;分离化合物Ⅵ对映体的流动相是正己烷-异丙醇（80：20,v/v）。柱温为25℃,流速为1.0 mL/min。6种化合物对映体均可在Chiralpak IC手性固定相上得到完全分离,证明该色谱柱对6种化合物具有较高的对映体选择性。     

高效液相色谱手性固定相法拆分尼拉帕尼对映体

建立了测定药物尼拉帕尼对映体纯度的HPLC分析方法。以正己烷与乙醇或异丙醇为流动相,在Chiralpak AD-H手性固定相上对尼拉帕尼对映体进行了拆分,并考察了流动相组成、柱温和流速对该对映体分离的影响。尼拉帕尼对映体在正己烷-异丙醇-二乙胺(85:15:0.1,V/V/V)为流动相、流速为1.0 m L/min、检测波长260 nm、柱温为30℃时,分析时间在15 min内,分离度大于2。本方法操作简单、重现性好,可用于尼拉帕尼对映体的质量控制。     

高效液相手性固定相法拆分1-苯乙烯基-3-己基丙炔醇

以纤维素衍生物为手性固定相,建立药物中间体1-苯乙烯基-3-己基丙炔醇对映体的HPLC手性分析方法。以正己烷与乙醇或异丙醇为流动相,在Chiralcel OD-H手性固定相上对1-苯乙烯基-3-己基丙炔醇进行了拆分,并考察了流动相组成、流速和柱温对该对映体分离的影响,获得较优分析条件,分析时间在15 min内,分离度大于1.5。结果表明,1-苯乙烯基-3-己基丙炔醇对映体在正己烷-异丙醇(体积比90:10)为流动相、流速为1.0 m L/min、柱温为25℃时,分离效果最佳。本方法可用于1-苯乙烯基-3-己基丙炔醇对映体的质量控制。     

液相色谱分析AEE788对映体纯度

在Chiralcel OD-H色谱柱上,采用正己烷与异丙醇或乙醇为流动相,对AEE788对映体进行了拆分,考察了流动相组成、柱温和流速等条件对拆分效果的影响。结果表明,AEE788对映体在正己烷-异丙醇-二乙胺(75:25:0.15,V/V/V)为流动相、柱温25℃、流速1.0 mL/min条件下,分离度为1.85,分析时间小于12 min。该分析方法的建立对药物AEE788不对称反应研究、分析/分离方法的开发及其生产过程的质量监控都具有非常重要的意义。     

手性固定相HPLC法直接拆分奈他地尔对映体EI北大核心CSCD

以纤维素衍生物为手性固定相,建立药物奈他地尔的HPLC手性分析方法。以正己烷与乙醇或异丙醇为流动相,在Chiralpak AD-H手性固定相上对奈他地尔对映体进行了拆分,并考察了流动相组成、柱温和流速对该对映体分离的影响,获得较优分析条件,分析时间在15 min内,分离度大于1.7。结果表明,奈他地尔对映体在正己烷-异丙醇-二乙胺(80:20:0.1,V:V:V)为流动相、流速为1.0 m L/min、柱温为30℃时,分离效果最佳。本方法操作简单、重现性好,可用于奈他地尔对映体的质量控制。     

人血清白蛋白柱上药物的手性拆分

考察了４种酸性药物和１种中性药物对映体在人血清白蛋白手性固定相上的保留行为。这５种药物与人血清白蛋白结合的亲和力高，难于实现快速分离，作者提出在流动相中加入短链脂肪酸－正己酸，可快速手性拆分非诺洛芬、萘普生和布洛芬。酮基布洛芬对映体分离选择性随乙腈浓度升高而增大，流动相中加入适量异丙醇可使对映体选择性大大增加（α～１．２３），华法令同样可取得很好分离。     

手性固定相HPLC法直接拆分奈他地尔对映体

以纤维素衍生物为手性固定相,建立药物奈他地尔的HPLC手性分析方法。以正己烷与乙醇或异丙醇为流动相,在Chiralpak AD-H手性固定相上对奈他地尔对映体进行了拆分,并考察了流动相组成、柱温和流速对该对映体分离的影响,获得较优分析条件,分析时间在15 min内,分离度大于1.7。结果表明,奈他地尔对映体在正己烷-异丙醇-二乙胺(80:20:0.1,V:V:V)为流动相、流速为1.0 m L/min、柱温为30℃时,分离效果最佳。本方法操作简单、重现性好,可用于奈他地尔对映体的质量控制。     

直链淀粉手性固定相分离马来酸曲美布汀和昂丹司琼对映体

建立了马来酸曲美布汀和昂丹司琼对映体的高效液相色谱拆分方法。使用Chiralpak AD-H手性色谱柱,采用正相洗脱方式,考察了流动相中有机改性剂的种类和浓度、酸碱比(冰乙酸-三乙胺)、柱温及流速等因素对对映体拆分的影响。确定了最佳拆分条件:分离马来酸曲美布汀的流动相为正己烷-异丙醇-冰乙酸-三乙胺(97∶3∶0.1∶0.3),流速为0.6mL/min;分离昂丹司琼的流动相为正己烷-异丙醇-冰乙酸-三乙胺(70∶30∶0.2∶0.4),流速为0.4mL/min,柱温均为20℃。在上述色谱条件下,两种手性药物对映体达到基线分离。     

直链淀粉手性固定相拆分联二萘酚对映体

建立了联二萘酚对映体的高效液相色谱拆分方法。使用ChiralpakAD-H手性色谱柱,考察了流动相中极性调节剂的种类和比例、柱温以及流速对拆分联二萘酚对映体的影响。确定了最佳拆分条件:流动相为V(正己烷):V(乙醇)=55:45;流速为0.8mL/min;检测波长254nm;柱温30℃。计算了联二萘酚与固定相相互作用的焓变差值Δ(ΔH0)和熵变差值Δ(ΔS0)分别为-2.10kJ/mol和-4.94J/(mol.K),并考察了在以乙醇或异丙醇为极性调节剂流动相中两对映体的出峰顺序,结果发现在这两种流动相中出峰顺序是相反的。方法可用于联二萘酚的手性分离与检测。     

纤维素键合手性固定相拆分喹禾灵对映体

采用Chiralpak IC(纤维素-三(3,5-二氯苯基氨基甲酸酯)键合在5μm硅胶上)键合型手性柱,建立了喹禾灵对映体的高效液相色谱拆分方法。系统考察了流动相组成、流速和柱温对喹禾灵对映体分离效果的影响。结果表明,在正己烷-异丙醇(95∶5,体积比)为流动相,流速1.0 mL/min,柱温25℃的条件下,喹禾灵对映体能获得基线分离,分离度Rs为3.97,R-构型先出峰,两对映体的检出限均为0.045 mg/L,定量下限均为0.15 mg/L。在15～35℃柱温范围内,lnα对1/T Van’t Hoff曲线呈良好的线性关系,相关系数(r2)大于0.99,分离因子α随温度升高而降低,焓变差和熵变差热力学参数显示,喹禾灵对映体的拆分过程受焓控制。     

酸催化的二芳基甲醇脱水环化氧化芳构化直接构筑4-芳基喹啉

我们发展了酸催化的二芳基甲醇的脱水环化氧化芳构化的方法,直接高产率（高达81%）的合成轴手性的4-芳基喹啉.而且,Lewis酸Zn（OTf）₂和手性膦酸都能催化这个反应,初步的不对称研究可以用er 71：29得到产物.     

双手性选择单元手性固定相的研究进展

手性固定相（chiral stationary phase,CSP）作为手性色谱分离的核心技术,在手性化合物的识别和分离中得到广泛应用。以双手性选择单元结合作为CSP是近些年的研究热点,研究表明,两种手性选择单元相结合的CSP可增加手性识别位点,显著提高分离效果。本文介绍了近几年双手性选择单元手性固定相在手性分离中的研究进展,并对其发展前景进行了展望。     

Simultaneous chiral analyses of multiple analytes: case studies, implications and method development considerations

The field of chiral separations had a modest beginning some two decades ago. However, due to rapid technological advancement coupled with simultaneous availability of innovative chiral stationary phases and novel chiral derivatization agents, the field of chiral separations has now totally outpaced many other separation fields. Keeping pace with rapid changes in the field of chiral separations, investigators continue to add stereoselective pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, pharmacologic and toxicological data of new and/or marketed racemic compounds to the literature. Examination of the evolution of chiral separations suggests that in the beginning many investigators attempted to separate and quantify a single pair of enantiomers, adopting either direct (separation made on a chiral stationary phase) or indirect (separation made following precolumn conversion of enantiomers to corresponding diastereomers) approaches. However, more recent trends in chiral separations suggest that investigators are attempting to separate and quantify multiple pairs of enantiomers with available technologies. Added to this, some interesting trends have been observed in many of the recently reported chiral applications, including preferences regarding internal standard selection, mobile phase contents and composition, sorting out issues with mass spectrometric detection, determination of elution order, analytical manipulations of metabolite(s) without reference standards and addressing some specificity-related issues. This review mainly focuses on chiral separations involving multiple chiral analytes and attempts to justify the need for such chiral separations involving multiple analytes. In this context, several cases studies are described on the utility and applicability of such chiral separations under discrete headings to provide an account to the readership on the implications of such tasks. The topics of case studies covered in this review include: (a) therapy markers--differentiation from drug abuse and/or applicability in forensics; (b) role in pharmacogenetic/polymorphic evaluation; (c) monitoring and understanding the role of parent and active metabolite(s) in clinical and preclinical investigations; (d) exploration on the pharmacokinetic utility of an active chiral metabolite vis-a-vis the racemic parent moiety; (e) understanding the chirality play in delineating peculiar toxic effects; (f) exploration of chiral inversion phenomenon, and understanding the role of stereoselective metabolism. For the further benefit of readership, some select examples (n = 19) of the separation of multiple chiral analytes with appropriate information on chromatography, detection system, validation parameters and applicable conclusion are also provided. Finally, the review covers some useful considerations for method development involving multiple chiral analytes.     

16种手性化合物在不同自制手性固定相上的拆分比较

采用高效液相色谱法,在自制的纤维素-三(3,5-二甲基苯基氨基甲酸酯)(ATEO-OD)、纤维素-三(4-甲基苯基氨基甲酸酯)(ATEO-OG)和纤维素-三(4-甲基苯基甲酸酯)(ATEO-OJ)3种手性柱上对16种不同结构的手性化合物进行了拆分和比较.试验结果表明:16个手性样品在这3种手性固定相上分别获得了不同程度的拆分,A TEO-OD对所分析样品具有更好的手性识别能力,ATEO-OG和ATEO-OJ的手性识别能力相当.     

Last ten years (2008–2018) of chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography in HPLC: An updated review

Chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography is one of the elective strategies for the direct enantioresolution of small chelating compounds: amino acids, diamines, amino alcohols, diols, small peptides, etc. Unlike other methods, the interaction between chiral selector and analyte enantiomers is mediated by a cation, thus producing diastereomeric ternary complexes. Two main approaches are conventionally applied in chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography. The first relies upon chiral stationary phases where the chiral selector is either covalently immobilized or physically adsorbed onto suitable packing materials (coated phases). In the second approach, chiral molecules are added to the eluent, thus generating chiral eluent systems. Among the advantages of chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography, the generation of UV/vis‐active metal complexes, and the use of commercially available or easy‐to‐synthesize chiral selectors, in combination to rather inexpensive achiral columns for coated phases and chiral eluents, are noteworthy. Besides amino acids and amino alcohols, other species have proven suitable for chiral ligand‐exchange chromatography applications. Recently, the use of either chiral ionic liquids or micellar liquid chromatography systems as well as the successful off‐column formation of diastereomeric complexes have expanded the selectivity profiles and application fields. All of these issues are touched in the review, shedding light to the contributions appeared in the last decade.     

环境中手性污染物对映体分析方法的研究进展

手性污染物对映体尽管具有相似的物理化学性质,但在环境中的吸附、转移、降解等过程往往存在一定差异。生态安全问题与人类健康密切相关,因此,对手性环境污染物进行对映体水平上的分离分析是十分重要的研究课题。目前,国内外对环境中的手性污染物已开展了相关研究,然而全面评述相关分析测定方法的新进展鲜有报道。本文主要对环境中手性污染物的种类以及近5年环境中手性污染物的分析检测技术如液相色谱-质谱联用法、气相色谱-质谱联用法、毛细管电泳法、超临界流体色谱-质谱联用法等进行了归纳、综述和展望,为后续手性污染物的分析检测提供依据和参考。     

手性2-噁唑烷酮的无溶剂合成法

手性2-噁唑烷酮的无溶剂合成法;手性氨基醇;脲;手性噁唑烷酮     

Methods of studies on quantitative structure–activity relationships for chiral compounds

Chiral compounds are very important in drug development, organic synthesis, materials science, toxicology, or environmental chemistry. Therefore, for creating new drugs, several methods have been suggested in recent years. In several laboratories in the world, some new methods for the derivations of the parameters were constructed and used for studies on quantitative structure–activity/property relationships of chiral molecules. The algorithms reviewed in this paper involve Zargeb group chiral indices, chiral molecular connectivity index, chiral topological charge index, chiral A_m index, chiral indices based on the matrixes, chiral indices based on chiral product, conformation‐independent chirality code, conformation‐dependent chirality code, quantitative two‐dimensional chirality degrees of benzenoids, and so on. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

手性2-(口恶)唑烷酮的无溶剂合成法

在无溶剂条件下,手性的β-氨基醇和脲在160-180℃反应0．5-1 h,在200℃反应0．5 h,高产率地获得手性噁唑烷酮。