Domination with exponential decay

Let G be a graph and S⊆V(G). For each vertex u∈S and for each v∈V(G)−S, we define to be the length of a shortest path in 〈V(G)−(S−{u})〉 if such a path exists, and ∞ otherwise. Let v∈V(G). We define if v⁄∈S, and w_S(v)=2 if v∈S. If, for each v∈V(G), we have w_S(v)≥1, then S is an exponential dominating set. The smallest cardinality of an exponential dominating set is the exponential domination number, γ_e(G). In this paper, we prove: (i) that if G is a connected graph of diameter d, then γ_e(G)≥(d+2)/4, and, (ii) that if G is a connected graph of order n, then .     

On the spanning fan-connectivity of graphs

Let G be a graph. The connectivity of G, κ(G), is the maximum integer k such that there exists a k-container between any two different vertices. A k-container of G between u and v, C_k(u,v), is a set of k-internally-disjoint paths between u and v. A spanning container is a container that spans V(G). A graph G is k^∗-connected if there exists a spanning k-container between any two different vertices. The spanning connectivity of G, κ^∗(G), is the maximum integer k such that G is w^∗-connected for 1≤w≤k if G is 1^∗-connected.Let x be a vertex in G and let U={y₁,y₂,…,y_k} be a subset of V(G) where x is not in U. A spanningk−(x,U)-fan, F_k(x,U), is a set of internally-disjoint paths {P₁,P₂,…,P_k} such that P_i is a path connecting x to y_i for 1≤i≤k and . A graph G is k^∗-fan-connected (or -connected) if there exists a spanning F_k(x,U)-fan for every choice of x and U with |U|=k and x∉U. The spanning fan-connectivity of a graph G, , is defined as the largest integer k such that G is -connected for 1≤w≤k if G is -connected.In this paper, some relationship between κ(G), κ^∗(G), and are discussed. Moreover, some sufficient conditions for a graph to be -connected are presented. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of a spanning pipeline-connectivity and discuss some sufficient conditions for a graph to be k^∗-pipeline-connected.     

The upper connected geodetic number and forcing connected geodetic number of a graph

For a connected graph G of order p≥2, a set S⊆V(G) is a geodetic set of G if each vertex v∈V(G) lies on an x-y geodesic for some elements x and y in S. The minimum cardinality of a geodetic set of G is defined as the geodetic number of G, denoted by g(G). A geodetic set of cardinality g(G) is called a g-set of G. A connected geodetic set of G is a geodetic set S such that the subgraph G[S] induced by S is connected. The minimum cardinality of a connected geodetic set of G is the connected geodetic number of G and is denoted by g_c(G). A connected geodetic set of cardinality g_c(G) is called a g_c-set of G. A connected geodetic set S in a connected graph G is called a minimal connected geodetic set if no proper subset of S is a connected geodetic set of G. The upper connected geodetic number is the maximum cardinality of a minimal connected geodetic set of G. We determine bounds for and determine the same for some special classes of graphs. For positive integers r,d and n≥d+1 with r≤d≤2r, there exists a connected graph G with , and . Also, for any positive integers 2≤a<b≤c, there exists a connected graph G such that g(G)=a, g_c(G)=b and . A subset T of a g_c-set S is called a forcing subset for S if S is the unique g_c-set containing T. A forcing subset for S of minimum cardinality is a minimum forcing subset of S. The forcing connected geodetic number of S, denoted by f_c(S), is the cardinality of a minimum forcing subset of S. The forcing connected geodetic number of G, denoted by f_c(G), is f_c(G)=min{f_c(S)}, where the minimum is taken over all g_c-sets S in G. It is shown that for every pair a,b of integers with 0≤a≤b−4, there exists a connected graph G such that f_c(G)=a and g_c(G)=b.     

On the degree distance of a graph

If G is a connected graph with vertex set V, then the degree distance of G, D^′(G), is defined as , where degw is the degree of vertex w, and d(u,v) denotes the distance between u and v. We prove the asymptotically sharp upper bound for graphs of order n and diameter d. As a corollary we obtain the bound for graphs of order n. This essentially proves a conjecture by Tomescu [I. Tomescu, Some extremal properties of the degree distance of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. (98) (1999) 159-163].     

On hamiltonian colorings for some graphs

For a connected graph G and any two vertices u and v in G, let D(u,v) denote the length of a longest u-v path in G. A hamiltonian coloring of a connected graph G of order n is an assignment c of colors (positive integers) to the vertices of G such that |c(u)−c(v)|+D(u,v)≥n−1 for every two distinct vertices u and v in G. The value of a hamiltonian coloring c is the maximum color assigned to a vertex of G. The hamiltonian chromatic number of G is taken over all hamiltonian colorings c of G. In this paper we discuss the hamiltonian chromatic number of graphs G with . As examples, we determine the hamiltonian chromatic number for a class of caterpillars, and double stars.     

Rainbow domination on trees

This paper studies a variation of domination in graphs called rainbow domination. For a positive integer k, a k-rainbow dominating function of a graph G is a function f from V(G) to the set of all subsets of {1,2,…,k} such that for any vertex v with f(v)=0? we have ∪_u∈NG(v)f(u)={1,2,…,k}. The 1-rainbow domination is the same as the ordinary domination. The k-rainbow domination problem is to determine the k-rainbow domination number of a graph G, that is the minimum value of ∑_v∈V(G)|f(v)| where f runs over all k-rainbow dominating functions of G. In this paper, we prove that the k-rainbow domination problem is NP-complete even when restricted to chordal graphs or bipartite graphs. We then give a linear-time algorithm for the k-rainbow domination problem on trees. For a given tree T, we also determine the smallest k such that .     

Bandwidth of the strong product of two connected graphs

The bandwidth B(G) of a graph G is the minimum of the quantity max{|f(x)-f(y)|:xy∈E(G)} taken over all proper numberings f of G. The strong product of two graphs G and H, written as G(S_P)H, is the graph with vertex set V(G)×V(H) and with (u₁,v₁) adjacent to (u₂,v₂) if one of the following holds: (a) u₁ and v₁ are adjacent to u₂ and v₂ in G and H, respectively, (b) u₁ is adjacent to u₂ in G and v₁=v₂, or (c) u₁=u₂ and v₁ is adjacent to v₂ in H. In this paper, we investigate the bandwidth of the strong product of two connected graphs. Let G be a connected graph. We denote the diameter of G by D(G). Let d be a positive integer and let x,y be two vertices of G. Let denote the set of vertices v so that the distance between x and v in G is at most d. We define δ_d(G) as the minimum value of over all vertices x of G. Let denote the set of vertices z such that the distance between x and z in G is at most d-1 and z is adjacent to y. We denote the larger of and by . We define η(G)=1 if G is complete and η(G) as the minimum of over all pair of vertices x,y of G otherwise. Let G and H be two connected graphs. Among other results, we prove that if δ_D(H)(G)?B(G)D(H)+1 and B(H)=⌈(|V(H)|+η(H)-2)/D(H)⌉, then B(G(S_P)H)=B(G)|V(H)|+B(H). Moreover, we show that this result determines the bandwidth of the strong product of some classes of graphs. Furthermore, we study the bandwidth of the strong product of power of paths with complete bipartite graphs.     

The signed star domination numbers of the Cartesian product graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)→{-1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function of G if for every v∈V(G), where E_G(v)={uv∈E(G)|u∈V(G)}. The minimum of the values of , taken over all signed star dominating functions f on G, is called the signed star domination number of G and is denoted by γ_SS(G). In this paper, a sharp upper bound of γ_SS(G×H) is presented.     

The multiple originator broadcasting problem in graphs

Given a graph G and a vertex subset S of V(G), the broadcasting time with respect toS, denoted by b(G,S), is the minimum broadcasting time when using S as the broadcasting set. And the k-broadcasting number, denoted by b_k(G), is defined by b_k(G)=min{b(G,S)|S⊆V(G),|S|=k}.Given a graph G and two vertex subsets S, S^′ of V(G), define , d(S,S^′)=min{d(u,v)|u∈S, v∈S^′}, and for all v∈V(G). For all k, 1?k?|V(G)|, the k-radius of G, denoted by r_k(G), is defined as r_k(G)=min{d(G,S)|S⊆V(G), |S|=k}.In this paper, we study the relation between the k-radius and the k-broadcasting numbers of graphs. We also give the 2-radius and the 2-broadcasting numbers of the grid graphs, and the k-broadcasting numbers of the complete n-partite graphs and the hypercubes.     

Distance-two labellings of Hamming graphs

Let j≥k≥0 be integers. An ?-L(j,k)-labelling of a graph G=(V,E) is a mapping ?:V→{0,1,2,…,?} such that |?(u)−?(v)|≥j if u,v are adjacent and |?(u)−?(v)|≥k if they are distance two apart. Let λ_j,k(G) be the smallest integer ? such that G admits an ?-L(j,k)-labelling. Define to be the smallest ? if G admits an ?-L(j,k)-labelling with ?(V)={0,1,2,…,?} and ∞ otherwise. An ?-cyclic L(j,k)-labelling is a mapping ?:V→Z_? such that |?(u)−?(v)|_?≥j if u,v are adjacent and |?(u)−?(v)|_?≥k if they are distance two apart, where |x|_?=min{x,?−x} for x between 0 and ?. Let σ_j,k(G) be the smallest ?−1 of such a labelling, and define similarly to . We determine λ_2,0, , σ_2,0 and for all Hamming graphs K_q1□K_q2□?□K_qd (d≥2, q₁≥q₂≥?≥q_d≥2) and give optimal labellings, with the only exception being for q≥4. We also prove the following “sandwich theorem”: If q₁ is sufficiently large then for any graph G between K_q1□K_q2 and K_q1□K_q2□?□K_qd, and moreover we give a labelling which is optimal for these eight invariants simultaneously.