Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Via Flotation Assistance (HLLME-FA) Method for the Pretreatment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Aqueous Samples and Determination by GC–MS

This work proposes a new, rapid and simple homogeneous liquid–liquid microextraction via flotation assistance technique for the analysis of six organochlorine pesticides in water samples. A special extraction cell was used to facilitate collection of the low-density solvent extract. No centrifugation was required in this procedure. Determination was carried using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The water sample solution was then added into the extraction cell containing appropriate mixture of extract and homogeneous solvents. In the first step, a homogeneous solution and then with the continuation of water sample injection, a cloudy solution was formed. Using air flotation, the organic solution was collected at the conical part of the designed cell. The optimized levels of effective parameters were found based on response surface methodology approach. Applying the optimized conditions to the system understudy, the limits of detection of all target analytes were obtained in the range of 1.4–7 ng mL^?1, while the precisions were found to be in the range of 11.08–14.87 (RSD, n = 3). The linearity of the method lay in the range of 10–150 ng mL^?1 with the coefficients of correlation (r ² ) ranging from 0.998 to 0.999.     

Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Via Flotation Assistance (HLLME-FA) Method for the Pretreatment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Aqueous Samples and Determination by GC–MS

This work proposes a new, rapid and simple homogeneous liquid–liquid microextraction via flotation assistance technique for the analysis of six organochlorine pesticides in water samples. A special extraction cell was used to facilitate collection of the low-density solvent extract. No centrifugation was required in this procedure. Determination was carried using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The water sample solution was then added into the extraction cell containing appropriate mixture of extract and homogeneous solvents. In the first step, a homogeneous solution and then with the continuation of water sample injection, a cloudy solution was formed. Using air flotation, the organic solution was collected at the conical part of the designed cell. The optimized levels of effective parameters were found based on response surface methodology approach. Applying the optimized conditions to the system understudy, the limits of detection of all target analytes were obtained in the range of 1.4–7 ng mL⁻¹, while the precisions were found to be in the range of 11.08–14.87 (RSD, n = 3). The linearity of the method lay in the range of 10–150 ng mL⁻¹ with the coefficients of correlation (r ²) ranging from 0.998 to 0.999.

     

Simultaneous Determination of Deltamethrin and Permethrin in Water Samples Using Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Microextraction via Flotation Assistance and GC-FID

A new method was developed for the simultaneous determination of deltamethrin and permethrin in water samples with homogeneous liquid–liquid microextraction via flotation assistance and gas chromatography–flame ionization detection. A special extraction cell was designed to facilitate collection of the low density solvent extracts. The sample solution was added into the extraction cell, which contained an appropriate mixture of n-hexane (as an extraction solvent) and acetone (as a homogeneous solvent). Air flotation allowed the extraction solvent to be collected from the top of the solution. Under the optimum conditions, good linearity was observed in the range of 1.0–200 μg L^?1 with a correlation coefficient (r ²) greater than 0.9980 for both of the analytes. The limits of detection were 0.2 and 0.3 μg L^?1 for deltamethrin and permethrin, respectively (S/N = 3). The developed method was successfully applied to determine the two pesticides in three different water samples.     

Improved Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Extraction Combined with GC–ECD for the Determination of Organochlorinated Pesticides in Water

In this study, improved homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction (HLLE), equipped with GC–ECD has been developed for the extraction and determination of organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs) in water. The phase separation phenomenon occurred by temperature in a ternary solvent (water/methanol/chloroform) system. Several factors influencing the extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized with orthogonal array design. Furthermore, in this study, for the first time, before immiscible organic phase formation, different volumes of deionized water were subjected to homogeneous solution to investigate the effect of this factor on the extraction performance of HLLE. Optimal results were as follows: volume of the extracting solvent (chloroform), 50?μL; volume of the consolute solvent (methanol), 1.2?mL; volume of the sample, 2.5?mL; volume of the deionized water, 0.5?mL; time of centrifuge, 7?min. Under the optimum conditions, repeatability was obtained by spiking OCPs at concentration level of 20?μg?L^?1, the RSDs varied between 4.8 and 10.7% (n?=?4). The limits of detection of 0.02–0.12?μg?L^?1 were obtained for the OCPs. Enrichment factors and the extraction percent of the studied compounds were in the range of 240–300 and 69.2–84.0%, respectively. Finally, the results of the proposed HLLE method were compared with the same HLLE method without addition of deionized water. The results indicated that the proposed method has higher enrichment factors and lower detection limits.     

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Preconcentration of Multiple Classes of Pesticides in Water

A simple, rapid, efficient, and environmentally friendly method was developed for the preconcentration of atrazine, simazine, diuron, bentazone, tebuconazole, and fipronil from water. Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was employed with determination by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The volumes of extraction and disperser solvents, the concentration of sodium chloride, and the pH were optimized by response surface methodology. The optimum conditions involved the use of 150 µL of 1:1 (v/v) monochlorobenzene:dichlorobenzene as the extraction solvent, 2 mL acetonitrile as the disperser solvent, and 10 mL of sample at pH 3.0. The accuracy was evaluated in terms of recovery values that were from 54 to 112%. The relative standard deviations ranged from 4 to 27%. The limits of quantification were between 0.005 and 0.05 µg L^?1. The optimized method had low matrix effects for the analytes and the results demonstrated application for the determination of pesticides in water.     

Ultra-Preconcentration and Determination of Multiple Pesticide Residues in Water Samples Using Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction and GC-FID

In this study, a simple and efficient method has been developed to analyze pesticides in water samples using ultrasonic-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (UA-DLLME) combined with gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Several parameters, including type and volume of extractant and dispersant, extraction time, and amount of salt on extraction performance, were optimized in detail. A mixture of acetonitrile (1.0 mL, dispersant) and carbon tetrachloride (15 μL, extractant) was used for extraction. Under optimal conditions, enrichment factors were obtained between 315 and 1153. The linearity of the method ranged from 1 to 100 μg L⁻¹ with correlation coefficients ≥0.9990. Limits of detection (S/N = 3) ranged between 0.09 and 0.57 μg L⁻¹, depending on the compounds. Relative standard deviations were <8.0 % (n = 5) for both intra- and inter-day analyses. The proposed method was successfully applied for the preconcentration and determination of pesticides in water samples (river water, tap water, and lake water) with recoveries that varied from 90.5 to 107.7 %.

     

Ultra-Preconcentration and Determination of Multiple Pesticide Residues in Water Samples Using Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction and GC-FID

In this study, a simple and efficient method has been developed to analyze pesticides in water samples using ultrasonic-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (UA-DLLME) combined with gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Several parameters, including type and volume of extractant and dispersant, extraction time, and amount of salt on extraction performance, were optimized in detail. A mixture of acetonitrile (1.0 mL, dispersant) and carbon tetrachloride (15 μL, extractant) was used for extraction. Under optimal conditions, enrichment factors were obtained between 315 and 1153. The linearity of the method ranged from 1 to 100 μg L^?1 with correlation coefficients ≥0.9990. Limits of detection (S/N = 3) ranged between 0.09 and 0.57 μg L^?1, depending on the compounds. Relative standard deviations were <8.0 % (n = 5) for both intra- and inter-day analyses. The proposed method was successfully applied for the preconcentration and determination of pesticides in water samples (river water, tap water, and lake water) with recoveries that varied from 90.5 to 107.7 %.     

Determination of Estrone and 17β-Estradiol in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by LC

A new method, termed dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), was developed for the extraction and pre-concentration of estrone (E1) and 17β-estradiol (E2) in water samples. The samples were extracted by 0.50 mL methanol (disperser solvent) containing 25.0 μL tetrachloroethane (extraction solvent). Important factors such as the volume and type of extraction and disperser solvent, extraction time and salt effect were studied. Under optimum conditions, the enrichment factors and the limits of detection were 347 and 0.2 ng mL^?1 for E1, and 203 and 0.1 ng mL^?1 for E2, respectively. The linear range was 0.5–5,000 ng mL^?1. Compared to other methods, DLLME–LC–VWD has advantages for E1 and E2 analysis in water: high enrichment factor, low cost, simplicity, quick and easy operation.     

Simultaneous Derivatization and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for Fatty Acid GC Determination in Water

Simultaneous derivatization and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction technique for gas chromatographic determination of fatty acids in water samples is presented. One hundred microlitre of ethanol:pyridine (4:1) were added to 4 mL aqueous sample. Then a solution containing 0.960 mL of acetone (disperser solvent), 10 μL of carbon tetrachloride (extraction solvent) and 30 μL of ethyl chloroformate (derivatization reagent) were rapidly injected into the aqueous sample. After centrifugation, 1 μL sedimented phase with the analytes was analyzed by gas chromatography. The effects of extraction solvent type, derivatization, extraction, and disperser solvents volume, extraction time were investigated. The calibration graphs were linear up to 10 mg L^?1 for azelaic acid (R ² = 0.998) and up to 1 mg L^?1 for palmitic and stearic acids (R ² = 0.997). The detection limits were 14.5, 0.67 and 1.06 μg L^?1 for azelaic, palmitic, and stearic acids, respectively. Repeatabilities of the results were acceptable with relative standard deviations (RSD) up to 13%. A possibility to apply the proposed method for fatty acids determination in tap, lake, sea, and river water was demonstrated.     

Determination of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners in Water by Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Procedure and Gas-Chromatography

Polychlorinated biphenyls are toxic pollutants characterized by persistence in the atmosphere and ability to accumulate in food chains. Like other persistent organic pollutants, polychlorinated biphenyls are still present in the environment despite their almost worldwide prohibition. In this study we propose a simple and a rapid liquid-liquid microextraction procedure to determine ten representative polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in rain and mineral water. The procedure combined extraction and concentration in a single step followed by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. The proposed methodology showed good linearity, reproducibility, and a limit of detection with a range of 10–30 ng/l. Real mineral water samples were analyzed using the optimized method.     

Comparison of Air-Assisted,Vortex-Assisted and Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Determination of BTEX Compounds in Water Samples Prior to GC-FID Analysis

Three new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods, air-assisted (AA-DLLME), vortex-assisted (VA-DLLME) and ultrasound-assisted (UA-DLLME), were compared from the point of view of their analytical application for preconcentration of trace amounts of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene isomers (BTEX) in water samples. In all of these methods, no dispersive solvent is required and dispersion of extractant is carried out by air bubbles, vortex and ultrasound for AA-DLLEM, VA-DLLME, and UA-DLLME, respectively. Advantages and disadvantages of these three liquid phase microextraction methods and their capability in dispersion of a similar extractant phase in sample solutions were comprehensively compared. All other extraction parameters, which have an influence on the microextraction, were also investigated and optimized. Under optimized conditions, analytical figures of merit for the three techniques were determined and compared. It was found that the limit of detection of the three methods is almost the same, while AA-DLLME has a wider linear dynamic range and the shortest analysis time. Enrichment factors of 182, 45 and 245 were achieved for AA-DLLEM, VA-DLLME, and UA-DLLME, respectively.     

Determination of Two Pesticides in Soils by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined with LC-Fluorescence Detection

In the present work, a simple, rapid and sensitive sample pre-treatment technique, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (LC-FLD), has been developed to determine carbamate (carbaryl) and organophosphorus (triazophos) pesticide residues in soil samples. Methanol was first used as extraction solvent for the extraction of pesticides from the soil samples and then as dispersive solvent in the DLLME procedure. Under the optimum extraction conditions, the linearity was obtained in the concentration range of 0.1–1,000 ng g⁻¹ for carbaryl and 1–5,000 ng g⁻¹ for triazophos, respectively. Correlation coefficients varied from 0.9997 to 0.9999. The limits of detection (LODs), based on signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 3, ranged from 14 to 110 pg g⁻¹. The relative standard deviation (RSDs, for 20.0 ng g⁻¹ of each pesticide) varied from 1.96 to 4.24% (n = 6). The relative recoveries of two pesticides from soil A1, A2 and A3 at spiking levels of 10.0, 20.0 and 50.0 ng g⁻¹ were in the range of 88.2–108.8%, 80.8–110.7% and 81.0–111.1%, respectively. The results demonstrated that DLLME was a sensitive and accurate method to determine the target pesticides, at trace levels, in soils.

     

Determination of Two Pesticides in Soils by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined with LC-Fluorescence Detection

In the present work, a simple, rapid and sensitive sample pre-treatment technique, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (LC-FLD), has been developed to determine carbamate (carbaryl) and organophosphorus (triazophos) pesticide residues in soil samples. Methanol was first used as extraction solvent for the extraction of pesticides from the soil samples and then as dispersive solvent in the DLLME procedure. Under the optimum extraction conditions, the linearity was obtained in the concentration range of 0.1–1,000 ng g^?1 for carbaryl and 1–5,000 ng g^?1 for triazophos, respectively. Correlation coefficients varied from 0.9997 to 0.9999. The limits of detection (LODs), based on signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 3, ranged from 14 to 110 pg g^?1. The relative standard deviation (RSDs, for 20.0 ng g^?1 of each pesticide) varied from 1.96 to 4.24% (n = 6). The relative recoveries of two pesticides from soil A1, A2 and A3 at spiking levels of 10.0, 20.0 and 50.0 ng g^?1 were in the range of 88.2–108.8%, 80.8–110.7% and 81.0–111.1%, respectively. The results demonstrated that DLLME was a sensitive and accurate method to determine the target pesticides, at trace levels, in soils.     

Liquid–Liquid–Liquid Micro Extraction Combined with CE for the Determination of Rare Earth Elements in Water Samples

A simple method for determination of rare earth elements (REEs) by liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction (LLLME) coupled with capillary electrophoresis and ultraviolet technique was developed. In the LLLME system, 40 mmol L^?1 4-benzoyl-3-methy-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolinone (PMBP) acted as extractant and 4% (v/v) formic acid was used as back-extraction solution. The parameters influencing the LLLME, including the type of the organic solvent, sample pH, formic acid concentration, PMBP concentration, extraction time, volume of organic solvent, stirring rate and phase volume ratio, were investigated. Under the optimized conditions, the detection limits (S/N = 3) of REEs were in the range of 0.19–0.70 ng mL^?1. The developed method was successfully applied to the determination of trace amounts of REEs in water samples.     

Determination of Anilines and Toluidines in Water by Salt-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined with GC-FID

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) assisted with salting-out was applied for the determination of five aromatic amines in water samples by using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. In this extraction method, several factors influencing the extraction efficiency of the target analytes, such as extraction and disperser solvent type and their volume, salt addition and amount, and pH, were studied and optimized. Under the optimal DLLME conditions, good linearity was observed in the range of 4–1,000 ng mL⁻¹ with the RSDs from 1.2 to 7.9 %. The LODs based on S/N of 3 ranged from 0.2 to 3.4 ng mL⁻¹ and the enrichment factors ranged from 207 to 4,315. The proposed method was successfully applied to the water samples collected from the tap and the lake, and the relative recoveries were in the range of 87.7–108.4 %.

     

Determination of Anilines and Toluidines in Water by Salt-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined with GC-FID

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) assisted with salting-out was applied for the determination of five aromatic amines in water samples by using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. In this extraction method, several factors influencing the extraction efficiency of the target analytes, such as extraction and disperser solvent type and their volume, salt addition and amount, and pH, were studied and optimized. Under the optimal DLLME conditions, good linearity was observed in the range of 4–1,000 ng mL^?1 with the RSDs from 1.2 to 7.9 %. The LODs based on S/N of 3 ranged from 0.2 to 3.4 ng mL^?1 and the enrichment factors ranged from 207 to 4,315. The proposed method was successfully applied to the water samples collected from the tap and the lake, and the relative recoveries were in the range of 87.7–108.4 %.     

Determination of Cadmium in Human Serum and Blood Samples after Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Using a Task-Specific Ionic Liquid

Task-specific ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (TSIL-DLLME) is a simple and rapid preconcentration approach for the measurement of cadmium in serum and blood samples of human subjects. In this method a novel task-specific ionic liquid, trioctylmethyl ammonium thiosalicylate (TOMATS), which has dual characteristics as a chelating agent and extractive solvent, was investigated. TOMATS complexes with Cd due to the chelating effect of the ortho-positioned carboxylate relative to the thiol functionality. The assessment of the optimum values of variables including the pH, amount of reagents (TOMATS, diluents, Triton X114, and back extracting acid solution), temperature, and incubation time, which affect the recoveries of analyte by TSIL-DLLME method were studied. After enrichment experiments, acidic solution was used to back extract the metal ions from the ionic liquid rich phase and with determination by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Using the optimal experimental conditions, the limit of detection (3?s), precision (relative standard deviation), preconcentration, and enhancement factors of developed method for Cd were found to be 0.05?µg/L, greater than 5%, 62.5, and 52.8, respectively. To check the accuracy of the developed method, certified reference material of serum and blood were analyzed by the developed method, and the measured values of Cd were in good agreement with the certified values. The developed method was applied successfully to determine Cd in blood and serum samples of lymphatic cancer patients relative to healthy controls.     

Rapid Determination of DDT and Its Metabolites in Environmental Water Samples with Mixed Ionic Liquids Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Prior to HPLC-UV

In this paper, a novel mixed ionic liquids-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method was developed for rapid enrichment and determination of environmental pollutants in water samples. In this method, two kinds of ionic liquids, hydrophobic ionic liquid and hydrophilic ionic liquid, were used as extraction solvent and disperser solvent, respectively. DDT and its metabolites were used as model analytes and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detector for the analysis. Factors that may affect the extraction recoveries, such as type and volume of extraction solvent (hydrophobic ionic liquid) and disperser solvent (hydrophilic ionic liquid), extraction time, sample pH and ionic strength, were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the linear range was 1–100 μg L⁻¹, limits of detection could reach 0.21–0.49 μg L⁻¹, and relative standard deviation was 6.01–8.48 % (n = 7) for the analytes. Satisfactory results were achieved when the method was applied to analyze the target pollutants in environmental water samples with spiked recoveries over the range of 85.7–106.8 %.

     

Enhancement of Sensitivity for Determination of Phenols in Environmental Water Samples by Single-drop Liquid Phase Microextraction Using Ionic Liquid prior to HPLC

In recent years, single-drop liquid phase microextraction (LPME) has attracted great attentions, and provides some merits including rapidness, simplicity, and low cost. In general, there are two modes of LPME sampling: direct-immersed LPME (DI-LPME) and h…