A Gadolinium Complex of the 5‐(1H‐Tetrazol‐5‐yl)isophthalic Acid Ligand: [Gd(C9H3N4O4)(H2O)3·2H2O]n

The reaction of Gd(ClO₄)₃·6H₂O with 5‐(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)isophthalic acid affords a 3D framework gadolinium coordination polymer, [Gd(C₉H₃N₄O₄)(H₂O)₃·2H₂O]_n ( 1 ). Its crystal structure belongs to a triclinic system, space group , with a = 7.909(2) Å; b = 8.448(2) Å; c = 10.994(2) Å; α = 102.65(3)°; β = 124.32(2)°; γ = 96.28(3)°; V = 704.5(2) ų; Z = 2; R₁ = 0.0245 for 3225 reflections with I >2σ(I), wR₂ = 0.0556. Fluorescent analyses show that compound 1 exhibits purple fluorescence in the solid state at room temperature.     

Reductive Coupling Reaction of Aryliminomethylferrocenes with Triethyl Orthoformate Induced by Low‐valent Titanium

Reductive coupling reaction of aryliminomethylferrocenes FcCH = NAr[(1, Ar=QHs (a), p‐ClC₆H₄ (b), p‐BrC₆H₄ (c), p‐CH₃C₆H₄ (d), m‐ClC₆H₄ (e)] with triethyl orthoformate (2) in Zn‐TiCl₄ system gave three kinds of products: 1, 3‐diaryl‐4, 5‐diferrocenyl imidazolidines (3), N, N‐disubstituted formamides (4), and 1, 2‐diferrocenyl ethylene (5). ¹H NMR spectra proved that all the compounds 3 obtained were dl‐isomers. All the new compounds 3 and 4 were characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR (for 3) and IR spectra. The molecular structure of 3c was determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Regiospecific synthesis of trichloromethyl substituted 4,5‐dihydro‐1h‐1‐tosylpyrazoles

The regiospecific synthesis of a new series of eight 3‐alkyl(aryl)‐5‐hydroxy‐5‐trichloromethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐1‐tosylpyrazoles is reported. The 1‐p‐tosyl‐2‐pyrazolines were obtained from the cyclocondensation reaction of 4‐alkyl(aryl)‐4‐alkoxy‐1,1,1‐trichloroalk‐3‐en‐2‐ones, [where alkyl = H, Me and aryl = ‐C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐OCH₃C₆H₄, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐ClC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄,] with p‐tosylhydrazine in 64 to 92 % yields, employing anhydrous toluene at reflux or diethyl ether at room temperature as the reaction condition.     

Metall‐π‐Aren‐Wechselwirkungen in den Kristallstrukturen von zwei Lewis‐Donor‐freien Arylbis(cyclopentadienyl)lanthanoiden

Metal‐π‐Arene‐Interactions in the Solid‐State Structures of Two Lewis Donor‐Free Arylbis(cyclopentadienyl)lanthanoids Ar*Yb(C₅H₄Me)₂ ( 1 ) and Ar*SmCp₂ ( 2 ) (Ar* = 2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃) have been obtained by the reaction of LiAr* with Yb(C₅H₄Me)₃ or SmCp₃ in toluene. Red crystals of 1 and orange crystals of 2 were characterized by X‐ray structure analysis. The lanthanoids are η⁵‐coordinated to the cyclopentadienyl ligands and η¹‐coordinated to the ipso carbon atom of the aryl groups. Additional π‐arene contacts to one mesityl group give rise to a different pyramidalisation of the metal centers, which depends on the size of the central lanthanoid atom.     

Cobalt(II) and cadmium(II) square grids supported with 4,4′‐bipyrazole and accommodating 3‐carboxyadamantane‐1‐carboxylate

In poly[[bis(μ‐4,4′‐bi‐1H‐pyrazole‐κ²N²:N^2′)bis(3‐carboxyadamantane‐1‐carboxylato‐κO¹)cobalt(II)] dihydrate], {[Co(C₁₂H₁₅O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (I), the Co²⁺ cation lies on an inversion centre and the 4,4′‐bipyrazole (4,4′‐bpz) ligands are also situated across centres of inversion. In its non‐isomorphous cadmium analogue, {[Cd(C₁₂H₁₅O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (II), the Cd²⁺ cation lies on a twofold axis. In both compounds, the metal cations adopt an octahedral coordination, with four pyrazole N atoms in the equatorial plane [Co—N = 2.156 (2) and 2.162 (2) Å; Cd—N = 2.298 (2) and 2.321 (2) Å] and two axial carboxylate O atoms [Co—O = 2.1547 (18) Å and Cd—O = 2.347 (2) Å]. In both structures, interligand hydrogen bonding [N...O = 2.682 (3)–2.819 (3) Å] is essential for stabilization of the MN₄O₂ environment with its unusually high (for bulky adamantanecarboxylates) number of coordinated N‐donor co‐ligands. The compounds adopt two‐dimensional coordination connectivities and exist as square‐grid [M(4,4′‐bpz)₂]_n networks accommodating monodentate carboxylate ligands. The interlayer linkage is provided by hydrogen bonds from the carboxylic acid groups via the solvent water molecules [O...O = 2.565 (3) and 2.616 (3) Å] to the carboxylate groups in the next layer [O...O = 2.717 (3)–2.841 (3) Å], thereby extending the structures in the third dimension.     

Syntheses,and Crystal Structures of Indium Complexes with η2‐Piperidinyldithiocarbamate and η2‐Pyridine‐2‐Thionate Containing Ligands: Structures of [In(η2‐S2CNC5H10)3] and [In(η2‐pyS)3]

The η²‐thio‐indium complexes [In(η²‐thio)₃] (thio = S₂CNC₅H₁₀, 2 ; SNC₄H₄, (pyridine‐2‐thionate, pyS, 3 ) and [In(η²‐pyS)₂(η²‐acac)], 4 , (acac: acetylacetonate) are prepared by reacting the tris(η²‐acac)indium complex [In(η²‐acac)₃], 1 with HS₂CNC₅H₁₀, pySH, and pySH with ratios of 1:3, 1:3, and 1:2 in dichloromethane at room temperature, respectively. All of these complexes are identified by spectroscopic methods and complexes 2 and 3 are determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Crystal data for 2 : space group, C2/c with a = 13.5489(8) Å, b = 12.1821(7) Å, c = 16.0893(10) Å, β = 101.654(1)°, V = 2600.9(3) ų, and Z = 4. The structure was refined to R = 0.033 and Rw = 0.086; Crystal data for 3 : space group, P2₁ with a = 8.8064 (6) Å, b = 11.7047 (8) Å, c = 9.4046 (7) Å, β = 114.78 (1)°, V = 880.13(11) ų, and Z = 2. The structure was refined to R = 0.030 and Rw = 0.061. The geometry around the metal atom of the two complexes is a trigonal prismatic coordination. The piperidinyldithiocarbamate and pyridine‐2‐thionate ligands, respectively, coordinate to the indium metal center through the two sulfur atoms and one sulfur and one nitrogen atoms, respectively. The short C‐N bond length in the range of 1.322(4)–1.381(6) Å in 2 and C‐S bond length in the range of 1.715(2)–1.753(6) Å in 2 and 3 , respectively, indicate considerable partial double bond character.     

Synthese und Struktur von Ruthenium(II)‐Komplexen mit Triazenido‐ und Pentaazadienido‐Liganden

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Triazenido and Pentaazadienido Ligands The ruthenium(II) triazenido complex [RuCl(ClC₆H₄N₃C₆H₄Cl)(p‐cymene)] ( 1 ) is obtained by the reaction of silver bis(p‐chlorphenyl)triazenid with [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ in CH₂Cl₂, and forms air stable, orange yellow crystals. It crystallizes as 1 ·CH₂Cl₂ in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with the lattice parameters a = 3134.3(3), b = 2105.7(2), c = 769.15(4) pm and Z = 8. In the diamagnetic mononuclear complex 1 the chelating triazenido ligand coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3). p‐Cymene binds η⁶ with its C₆ ring. The reaction of the etherphosphane complex [RuCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂C₄H₇O₂)₂] with 1, 3‐bis(p‐tolyl)triazenid in THF yields the complex [RuCl(tolyl‐N₃‐tolyl)(Ph₂PCH₂C₄H₇O₂)₂] ( 2 ). 2 forms monoclinic, red crystals with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1521.0(2), b = 1451.8(2), c = 2073.7(2) pm, β = 99.29(1)° and Z = 4. It is air stable and diamagnetic. The triazenide ion coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3). One of the two etherphosphane ligands is chelating and coordinates with the P atom and one O atom, while the other ligand binds in a monodentate fashion with its P atom, resulting in a coordination number of six for the Ru^II. [Ag(tolyl‐N₅‐tolyl)]₂ reacts in THF with [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)]₂ to afford the air stable, diamagnetic pentaazadienido complex [RuCl(tolyl‐N₅‐tolyl)(C₆H₆)] ( 3 ). 3 forms monoclinic, red crystals with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1462.4(1), b = 1056.51(8), c = 1371.4(1) pm, β = 114.36(1)° and Z = 4. The chelating pentaazadienido ligand coordinates with the atoms N(1) and N(3) at the divalent Ru atom. The benzene molecule binds η⁶ with its π system.     

Sigma‐ versus Pi‐Koordination in Bis‐indenyl‐ und Bis‐2‐methallyl‐Imidokomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs: DF‐Rechnungen und Kristallstrukturanalyse

Sigma‐ versus Pi‐Coordination in Bis‐indenyl‐ and Bis‐2‐methallyl Imido Complexes of Hexavalent Molybdenum and Tungsten: DF‐Calculations and Crystal Structure Analysis Bis‐indenyl and bis‐2‐methallyl imido complexes [(C₉H₇)₂M(NR)₂] (M = Mo, W; R = tert‐butyl, mesityl) 1 — 4 and [(H₃C‐C₃H₄)₂M(NtBu)₂] (M = Mo, W) 6 , 7 have been prepared starting from [Mo(NtBu)₂Cl₂] or [M(NR)₂Cl₂L₂] (M = W, R = tBu, L = py; M = Mo, W, R = Mes, L₂ = dme) and indenyl lithium or 2‐methallyl magnesium bromide, respectively. According to spectroscopic data and the crystal structure of 4 there are two different coordination modes of the indenyl ligands, [(η³‐C₉H₇)M(NR)₂(η¹‐C₉H₇)], in solution as well as in the solid state. These compounds show fluxional rearrangements in solution, namely σ, π‐exchange of η¹‐ and η³‐coordinated ligands. Similar behavior has been observed for the 2‐methallyl complexes 6 and 7 in solution. In agreement with experimental observations, DF calculations on models of 6 strongly suggest a (σ+π)‐coordination mode of the η³‐coordinated ligand.     

Luminescence properties of the structure built from 3‐cyano‐4‐dicyanomethylene‐5‐oxo‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐olate and caesium(I)

The structure of caesium(I) 3‐cyano‐4‐dicyanomethylene‐5‐oxo‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐olate (CsA), Cs⁺·C₈HN₄O₂⁻, is related to its luminescence properties. The structure of CsA (triclinic, P) is not isomorphous with previously reported structures (monoclinic, P2₁/c) of the KA and RbA salts. Nevertheless, the coordination numbers of the metals are equal for all salts (nine). Each anion in the CsA salt is connected by pairs of inversion‐related N—H...O hydrogen bonds to another anion, forming a centrosymmetric dimer. The dimers are linked into infinite ribbons, stacked by means of π–π interactions, thus building up an anionic wall. Time‐dependent density functional theory calculations show that the formation of the dimer shifts the wavelength of the luminescence maximum to the blue region. Shortening the distance between stacked anions in the row [from 3.431 (5) Å for RbA to 3.388 (2) Å for KA to 3.244 (10) Å for CsA] correlates with a redshift of the luminescence maximum from 574 and 580 nm to 596 nm, respectively.     

The Cocrystallization of the Cubic [Ta6Br12(H2O)6][CuBr2X2]·10H2O and Triclinic [Ta6Br12(H2O)6]X2·trans‐[Ta6Br12(OH)4(H2O)2]·18H2O (X = Cl,Br, NO3) Phases with the Coexistence of [Ta6Br12]2+ and [Ta6Br12]4+ in the Latter

Cubic [Ta₆Br₁₂(H₂O)₆][CuBr₂X₂]·10H₂O and triclinic [Ta₆Br₁₂(H₂O)₆]X₂·trans‐[Ta₆Br₁₂(OH)₄(H₂O)₂]·18H₂O (X = Cl, Br, NO₃) cocrystallize in aqueous solutions of [Ta₆Br₁₂]²⁺ in the presence of Cu²⁺ ions. The crystal structures of [Ta₆Br₁₂(H₂O)₆]Cl₂·trans‐[Ta₆Br₁₂(OH)₄(H₂O)₂]·18H₂O ( 1 ) and [Ta₆Br₁₂(H₂O)₆]Br₂·trans‐[Ta₆Br₁₂(OH)₄(H₂O)₂]·18H₂O ( 3 )have been solved in the triclinic space group P&1macr; (No. 2). Crystal data: 1 , a = 9.3264(2) Å, b = 9.8272(2) Å, c = 19.0158(4) Å, α = 80.931(1)?, β = 81.772(2)?, γ = 80.691(1)?; 3 , a = 9.3399(2) Å, b = 9.8796(2) Å, c = 19.0494(4) Å; α = 81.037(1)?, β = 81.808(1)?, γ = 80.736(1)?. 1 and 3 consist of two octahedral differently charged cluster entities, [Ta₆Br₁₂]²⁺ in the [Ta₆Br₁₂(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cation and [Ta₆Br₁₂]⁴⁺ in trans‐[Ta₆Br₁₂(OH)₄(H₂O)₂]. Average bond distances in the [Ta₆Br₁₂(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations: 1 , Ta‐Ta, 2.9243 Å; Ta‐Brⁱ , 2.607 Å; Ta‐O, 2.23 Å; 3 , Ta‐Ta, 2.9162 Å; Ta‐Brⁱ , 2.603 Å; Ta‐O, 2.24 Å. Average bond distances in trans‐[Ta₆‐Br₁₂(OH)₄(H₂O)₂]: 1 , Ta‐Ta, 3.0133 Å; Ta‐Brⁱ, 2.586 Å; Ta‐O(OH), 2.14 Å; Ta‐O(H₂O), 2.258(9) Å; 3 , Ta‐Ta, 3.0113 Å; Ta‐Brⁱ, 2.580 Å; Ta‐O(OH), 2.11 Å; Ta‐O(H₂O), 2.23(1) Å. The crystal packing results in short O···O contacts along the c axes. Under the same experimental conditions, [Ta₆Cl₁₂]²⁺ oxidized to [Ta₆Cl₁₂]⁴⁺ , whereas [Nb₆X₁₂]²⁺ clusters were not affected by the Cu²⁺ ion.     

A Novel One‐Dimensional Zinc Coordination Polymer, [Zinc{(4,5‐ditetrazoyl)‐imidazole}{(1,10)‐phenanthroline}(H2O)]n

The reaction of 4,5‐dicyanoimidazole with ZnCl₂ and NaN₃ in the presence of (1,10)‐phenanthroline and water affords a novel one‐dimensional zinc coordination polymer, [zinc{(4,5‐ditetrazoyl)‐imidazole}{(1,10)‐phenanthroline}(H₂O)]_n ( 1 ), in which 1 contains a ditetrazole ligand and strongly supports the Demko‐Sharpless' tetrazole synthesis reaction. The structure was determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. Crystal data: P2₁/n; a = 11.908(18); b = 8.133(10); c = 21.01(3) Å; β = 112.46(7)°; V = 1880(1) ų; Z = 4; R₁ = 0.0882, wR₂ = 0.2091.     

An efficient and regiospecific preparation of trifluoromethyl substituted 4‐( 1H‐pyrazol‐1 ‐yl)‐7‐chloroquinolines

A new series of 4‐[3‐alkyl(aryl)(heteroaryl)‐5‐hydroxy‐5‐trifluoromethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]‐7‐chloroquinolines, where [alkyl = CH₃; aryl = C₆H₅, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐ClC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄, 4‐CH₃OCgH₄, 4‐NO₂CgH₄, 4‐biphenyl, 1‐naphthyl; heteroaryl = 2‐furyl and 2‐thienyl] has been regiospecifi‐caly obtained from the reaction of 7‐chloro‐4‐hydrazinoquinoline with 4‐substituted‐l,1,1‐trifluoro‐4‐methoxybut‐3‐en‐2‐ones in 61 ‐ 96 % yield. Subsequently, dehydration reaction of 4,5‐dihydropyra‐zolylquinolines under acid conditions furnished a new series of 4‐(3‐substituted‐5‐trifluoromethyl‐1H‐pyra‐zol‐1‐yl)‐7‐chloroquinolines in 73 ‐ 96 % yield.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Properties of the Complexes [Ag(N∧S)n](X), N∧S = 1‐Methyl‐2‐(alkylthiomethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazoles,X = PF6 (n = 2) or PO2F2 (n = 1)

The complexes [Ag(η²‐N∧S)₂](PF₆), N∧S = 1‐methyl‐2‐(methylthiomethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole, mmb (complex 1 ) or 1‐methyl‐2‐(tert‐butylthiomethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole, mtb (complex 2 ), and [Ag(μ,η²‐mmb)(μ,η²‐O₂PF₂)] (complex 3 ) were synthesized and characterized by X‐ray crystallography. Long Ag–S (ca. 2.70 Å) and shorter Ag–N bonds (ca. 2.23 Å) are part of characteristically distorted tetrahedral coordination arrangements at the silver(I) ions in 1 and 2 . Unexpectedly, the comparison with the copper analogue [Cu(η²‐mmb)₂](PF₆) reveals a more tetrahedral and less linear coordination arrangement for the corresponding silver species. Compound 3 as obtained by hydrolysis of the PF₆ ion or by the use of AgPO₂F₂ exhibits bridging mmb and η²‐difluorophosphate ligands in a chain‐type structure.     

Pentafulvenkomplexe des Titans — Synthese,Struktur und Fluktuierendes Verhalten von Cp′Ti{η6‐C5H4=C(p‐Tol)2}Cl (Cp′ = Cp*, Cp)

Complexes of Titanium — Synthesis, Structure, and Fluxional Behaviour of CpTi{η⁶‐C₅H₄=C(p‐Tol)₂}Cl (Cp′ = Cp*, Cp) The reaction of Cp′TiCl₃ (C′ = Cp* or Cp) with magnesium and 6, 6‐di‐para‐tolylpentafulvene generates good yields of pentafulvene complexes Cp*Ti{η⁶‐C₅H₄=C(p‐Tol)₂}Cl ( 4 ) and CpTi{η⁶‐C₅H₄=C(p‐Tol)₂}Cl ( 5 ), respectively. The crystal and molecular structure of 4 have been determined from X‐ray data and exhibits compared to known η⁶‐pentafulvene complexes an unusual large Ti—C(p‐Tol)₂ (Fv)‐distance (2.535(5)Å) evoked by the bulky substituents at the exocyclic carbon. Dynamic ¹H‐NMR and spin saturation transfer experiments point out a rotation of the fulvene ligand around the Ti—Ct2 axis (Ct2 = centroid of the fulvene ring carbon atoms) with an activation barrier ΔG^≠_C = 60.6 ± 0.5 kJ mol⁻¹ (T_C = 314 ± 2 K). For 5 this barrier is significantly larger. Analogous dynamic behaviour is well known for diene complexes, but to our knowledge, it is here first‐time described for a pentafulvene complex.     

Platinum Complexes of a Borane‐Appended Analogue of 1,1′‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene: Flexible Borane Coordination Modes and in situ Vinylborane Formation

A bis(phosphine)borane ambiphilic ligand, [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh₂)‐ortho})] (FcPPB), in which the borane occupies a terminal position, was prepared. Reaction of FcPPB with tris(norbornene)platinum(0) provided [Pt(FcPPB)] ( 1 ) in which the arylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Subsequent reaction with CO and CNXyl (Xyl=2,6‐dimethylphenyl) afforded [PtL(FcPPB)] {L=CO ( 2 ) and CNXyl ( 3 )} featuring η²BC‐ and η¹B‐arylborane coordination modes, respectively. Reaction of 1 or 2 with H₂ yielded [PtH(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] in which the borane is bound to a hydride ligand on platinum. Addition of PhC₂H to [Pt(FcPPB)] afforded [Pt(C₂Ph)(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] ( 5 ), which rapidly converted to [Pt(FcPPB′)] ( 6 ; FcPPB′=[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh‐CPh=CHPh‐Z)‐ortho}]) in which the newly formed vinylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Unlike arylborane complex 1 , vinylborane complex 6 does not react with CO, CNXyl, H₂ or HC₂Ph at room temperature.     

Preparation of new 2‐amino‐ and 2,3‐diamino‐pyridine trifluoroacetyl enamine derivatives and their application to the synthesis of trifluoromethyl‐containing 3H‐pyrido[2,3‐b][1,4] diazepinols

The synthesis of a novel series of the intermediates N²(N³)‐[1‐alkyl(aryl/heteroaryl)‐3‐oxo‐4,4,4‐trifluoroalk‐1‐en‐1‐yl]‐2‐aminopyridines [F₃CC(O)CH?CR¹(2? NH?C₅H₃N)] and 2,3‐diaminopyridines [F₃CC(O)CH?CR¹(2‐NH₂‐3‐NH? C₅H₃N)], where R¹ = H, Me, C₆H₅, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐CIC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐OCH₃C₆H₄, 4,4′‐biphenyl, 1‐naphthyl, 2‐thienyl, 2‐furyl, is reported. The corresponding series of 2‐aryl(heteroaryl)‐4‐trifluoromethyl‐3H‐pyrido[2,3‐b][1,4]diazepin‐4‐ols obtained from intramolecular cyclization reaction of the respective trifluoroacetyl enamines or from the direct cyclocondensation reaction of 4‐methoxy‐1,1,1‐trifluoroalk‐3‐en‐2‐ones with 2,3‐diaminopyridine, under mild conditions, is also reported.     

Synthesis and Structure of Low‐valent η4‐Cinnamaldehyde Cobalt Complexes

Three η⁴‐(C=C–C=O) coordination cobalt(I) complexes 1 – 3 were synthesized by the reactions of cinnamaldehyde, p‐fluorocinnamaldehyde, and p‐chlorocinnamaldehyde with CoMe(PMe₃)₄. Complex 4 as η²‐(C=C) coordination was prepared by the reaction of chalcone with Co(PMe₃)₄. The structures of complexes 1 – 4 were confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Although the reactions didn't undergo C–H bond activation and decarbonylation, the formation of complexes 1 – 4 deepens our understanding of the reactions between α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde or ketone with low‐valent central cobalt atom.     

(Tetra­hydro­furan)­potassium mer‐trans‐tris­(carbazolyl)­di­chloro(tetra­hydro­furan)­zirconate

In the title compound, [K(C₄H₈O)][ZrCl₂(C₁₂H₈N)₃(C₄H₈O)], the Zr atom is pseudo‐octahedral, with two Cl ligands in trans positions. There is extensive interaction between the potassium cation and two of the aromatic carbazolyl ligands in η⁶ [C⃛K = 3.167 (3)–3.331 (3) Å] and η² [C⃛K = 3.147 (3)–3.268 (2) Å] fashions.     

Structural and NMR Studies of the Hexameric Copper(I) Complex with N‐n‐butyl‐N′‐ethoxycarbonyl‐thioureate

The copper sulfide mineral flotation collector, N‐n‐butyl‐N′‐ethoxycarbonyl‐thiourea (H₂bectu), and the 1:1 hexameric copper(I) thioureate complex, [Cu(Hbectu)]₆, have been characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. H₂bectu crystallizes in the triclinic space group with a = 5.2754(4), b = 9.0042(7), c = 12.6030(9) Å, α = 80.528(6), β = 90.173(6), γ = 76.472(7)°. An intramolecular N‐H···O hydrogen bond between the thioamide proton and carbonyl oxygen forms a planar six‐membered ring in the central core of the molecule with C=O, C=S and C‐N bond lengths in accord with those reported for other N‐alkyl/aryl‐N′‐acyl‐thiourea compounds. [Cu(Hbectu)]₆ crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a = 23.269(5), b = 13.243(4), c = 23.037(7) Å, β = 91.81(2)° as discrete hexameric clusters disposed about a crystallographic centre of symmetry with a Cu₆S₆ core consisting of two Cu₃S₃ chair‐shaped rings linked by coordination of the deprotonated amide nitrogen atom to a copper atom in the adjacent ring. The six ligands assemble as a paddlewheel structure with the ethoxy and n‐butyl substituents packing in an alternating head to tail arrangement. Temperature dependent solution ¹H NMR spectroscopic studies show that the hexameric structure of the complex is maintained in solution.