Synthesis of diblock methylcellulose derivatives with regioselective functionalization patterns

This article describes a new synthesis strategy to prepare diblock copolymers as model compounds for industrially produced cellulose ethers exemplified with methylcellulose (MC). To elucidate a key structure for thermoreversible gelation of MC, five regioselectively methylated celluloses 1 – 5 (236, 23, 26, 3, and 6 MC), five corresponding methyl‐β‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐cellulosides 6 – 10 , and five equiv methyl‐β‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐cellulosides 11 – 15 were synthesized for the first time via combination of the glycosyl trichloroacetimidate method and the acid‐catalyzed methanolysis method. The structure of compounds 1 – 15 was confirmed by means of NMR spectroscopy and MALDI‐TOF MS. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Tetrapterosides A and B,two new oleanane‐type saponins from Tetrapleura tetraptera

From the stem bark of Tetrapleura tetraptera, two new oleanane‐type saponins, tetrapteroside A 3‐O‐{6‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐hydroxyocta‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐[β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)]‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl}‐3,27‐dihydroxyoleanolic acid (1), and tetrapteroside B 3‐O‐{ β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐6‐O‐[(E)‐feruloyl]‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐[β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)]‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl}‐3,27‐dihydroxyoleanolic acid (2), were isolated. Further extractions from the roots led to the isolation of four known oleanane‐type saponins. Their structures were elucidated by the combination of mass spectrometry (MS), one and two‐dimensional NMR experiments. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Separation and purification of four flavonol diglucosides from the flower of Meconopsis integrifolia by high‐speed counter‐current chromatography

Flavonoids are the main components of Meconopsis integrifolia (Maxim.) Franch, which is a traditional Tibetan medicine. However, traditional chromatography separation requires a large quantity of raw M. integrifolia and is very time consuming. Herein, we applied high‐speed counter‐current chromatography in the separation and purification of flavonoids from the ethanol extracts of M. integrifolia flower. Ethyl acetate/n‐butanol/water (2:3:5, v/v/v) was selected as the optimum solvent system to purify the four components, namely quercetin‐3‐O‐β‐d‐ glucopyrannosy‐(1→6)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranoside (compound 1 , 60 mg), quercetin 3‐O‐[2’’’‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranoside (compound 2 , 40 mg), quercetin 3‐O‐[3’’’‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranoside (compound 3 , 11 mg), and quercetin 3‐O‐[6’’’‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranoside (compound 4 , 16 mg). Among the four compounds, 3 and 4 were new acetylated flavonol diglucosides. After the high‐speed counter‐current chromatography separation, the purities of the four flavonol diglucosides were 98, 95, 90, and 92%, respectively. The structures of these compounds were identified by mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy.     

Xanthone O‐Glycosides from the Roots of Pteris Multifida

Two new xanthone glycosides and six known compounds were isolated from the roots of Pteris multifida. Based on spectroscopic and chemical methods, the structures of the new compounds were elucidated as 1‐hydroxy‐4,7‐dimethoxy‐8‐(3‐methyl‐2‐butenyl)‐6‐O‐α‐L‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐[β‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐β‐D‐glucopyranosylxanthone ( 1 ), and 1,3‐dihydroxy‐7‐methoxy‐8‐(3‐methyl‐2‐butenyl)‐6‐O‐α‐L‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 →2)‐[β‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐β‐D‐glucopyranosylxanthone ( 2 ), respectively.     

Structure elucidation of new acacic acid‐type saponins from Albizia coriaria

Three new acacic acid derivatives, named coriariosides C, D, and E ( 1–3 ) were isolated from the roots of Albizia coriaria. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of extensive 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR studies and mass spectrometry as 3‐O‐[β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐β‐D ‐fucopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐2‐(acetamido)‐2‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]‐21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐6‐O‐{4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐ 6‐O‐(β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐O‐(β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl}‐2,6‐dimethylocta‐2,7‐dienoyl}acacic acid 28‐O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl ester ( 1 ), 3‐O‐{β‐D ‐fucopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐[β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)]‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl}‐21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐6‐O‐{4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐O‐(β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐O‐(β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl}‐2,6‐dimethylocta‐2,7‐dienoyl}acacic acid 28‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamno pyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl ester ( 2 ), and 3‐O‐[β‐D ‐fucopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]‐21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐6‐O‐{4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐O‐(β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl)‐β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyl]octa‐2,7‐dienoyl}acacic acid 28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl ester ( 3 ). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of β-（ 1→6）-Branched （ 1→3）-Glucononaoside with Alter-nate β- and α-Bonds in the Backbone

Lauryl glycoside of β-D-Glcp-(1→3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1→6)-]α-D-Glcp-(1→3)-β-D-Glcp-(1→3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1→6)-]α-D-Glcp-(1→3)-β-D-Glcp-(1→3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1→6)-]β-D-Glcp was synthesized through 3 3 3 strategy. 3-O-Allyl-2,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)- -[2, 3, 4, 6-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→6)-] 1,2-O-isopropylidene-α-D-glucofuranose was used as the key intermediate which was converted to the corresponding trisaccharide donor and acceptor readily.     

Synthesis of a Blocked Tetrasaccharide Related to the Repeating Unit of the Antigen from Shigella dysenteriae Type 9 in the Form of Its Methyl (R)‐Pyruvate Ester and 2‐(Trimethylsilyl)Ethyl Glycoside

Starting from d‐mannose, d‐galactose and d‐glucosamine hydrochloride, two disaccharide blocks were synthesized. Schmidt's inverse addition technique of trichloroacetimidate was utilized for the construction of a disaccharide with a β‐mannosidic linkage in good yield. The other disaccharide had a methyl 4,6‐(R)‐pyruvate ester. The two disaccharides in the appropriate form were then allowed to react in the presence of N‐iodosuccinimide (NIS) and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) to give the desired tetrasaccharide derivative, 2‐(trimethylsilyl)ethyl 2‐acetamido‐3,4,6‐tri‐O‐benzoyl‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐2‐O‐benzoyl‐4,6‐O‐[(R)‐1‐methoxycarbonylethylidene]‐β‐d‐galactopyranosyl‐(l→4)‐2,3,6‐tri‐O‐benzyl‐β‐d‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐2,6‐di‐O‐benzyl‐3‐O‐(4‐methoxybenzyl)‐β‐d‐galactopyranoside.     

Four new ursane‐type saponins from Morina nepalensis var. alba

Four new ursane‐type saponins, monepalosides C–F, together with a known saponin, mazusaponin II, were isolated from Morina nepalensis var. alba Hand.‐Mazz. Their structures were determined to be 3‐O‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐&[alpha;‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)]‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosylpomolic acid 28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranoside (monepaloside C, 1 ), 3‐O‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐&[alpha;‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)]‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosylpomolic acid 28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranoside (monepaloside D, 2 ), 3‐O‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐&[beta;‐D ‐glucopyranosy‐(1 → 2)]‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosylpomolic acid 28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranoside (monepaloside E, 3 ) and 3‐O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosylpomolic acid 28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranoside (monepaloside F, 4 ) on the basis of chemical and spectroscopic evidence. 2D NMR techniques, including ¹H–¹H COSY, HMQC, 2D HMQC‐TOCSY, HMBC and ROESY, and selective excitation experiments, including SELTOCSY and SELNOESY, were utilized in the structure elucidation and complete assignments of ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Structure elucidation of new oleanane‐type glycosides from three species of Acanthophyllum

From the roots of three species of Acanthophyllum (Caryophyllaceae), two new gypsogenic acid glycosides, 1 and 2, were isolated, 1 from A. sordidum and A. lilacinum, 2 from A. elatius and A. lilacinum, together with three known saponins, glandulosides B and C, and SAPO50. The structures of 1 and 2 were established mainly by 2D NMR techniques as 23‐O‐β‐D ‐galactopyranosylgypsogenic acid‐28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐[β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→6)]‐β‐D ‐galactopyranoside (1) and gypsogenic acid‐28‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐[β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→6)]‐β‐D ‐galactopyranoside (2). The cytotoxicity of several of these saponins was evaluated against two human colon cancer cell lines (HT‐29 and HCT 116). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Complexation of 4‐dimethylaminoazobenzene with various kinds of cyclodextrins: Effects of cyclodextrins on the thermal cis‐to‐trans isomerization

On the basis of the change in electronic and induced circular dichroism spectra for complex formation, the complexation of 4‐dimethylaminoazobenzene (DAAB) with four kinds of cyclodextrins (α‐ and β‐cyclodextrin (CD), heptakis(2,6‐di‐O‐methyl)‐β‐cyclodextrin, and heptakis(2,3,6‐tri‐O‐methyl)‐β‐cyclodextrin) was studied in methanol–water and dimethyl sulfoxide–water mixtures. It was found that the trans and cis isomers of DAAB form two different types of complex (inclusion and lid type) with CDs, depending on the kinds of CDs and solvents. Further, we have examined the effect of CDs on the thermal cis‐to‐trans isomerization of DAAB. The accelerated or decelerated effect on the thermal isomerization was observed upon adding CDs. The effects of CDs on the thermal isomerization are discussed in connection with the complexation of the cis‐isomer of DAAB with CDs. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 34: 481–487, 2002     

Two new complex triterpenoid saponins from Gledistsia dolavayi Franch.

Two new triterpenoid saponins, gledistside A ( 1 ) and gledistside B ( 2 ), isolated from the fruits of Gledistsia dolavayi Franch., were characterized as the 3,28‐O‐bisdesmoside of echinocystic acid acylated with monoterpene carboxylic acids. On the basis of spectroscopic and chemical evidence, their structures were elucidated as 3‐O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐28‐O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐[β‐D ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐{6‐O‐[2,6‐dimethyl‐6(S)‐hydroxy‐2‐trans‐2,7‐octadienoyl]}‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosylechinocystic acid ( 1 ) and 3‐O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐28‐O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐[β‐D ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐{6‐O‐[2‐hydroxymethyl‐6‐methyl‐6(S)‐hydroxy‐2‐trans‐2,7‐octadienoyl]}‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosylechinocystic acid ( 2 ). The complete ¹H and ¹³C assignments of saponins 1 and 2 were achieved on the basis of 2D NMR spectra including HMQC‐TOCSY, TOCSY, ¹H–¹H COSY, HMBC, ROESY and HMQC spectra. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

New saponins from Sechium mexicanum

The chemical study of Sechium mexicanum roots led to the isolation of the two new saponins {3‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl (1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐2β,3β,16α,23‐tetrahydroxyolean‐12‐en‐28‐oic acid 28‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranoside} (1) and {3‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl (1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐2β,3β,16α,23‐tetrahydroxyolean‐12‐en‐28‐oic acid 28‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐[β‐D ‐apiosyl‐(1 → 3)]‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranoside} (2), together with the known compounds {3‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐2β,3β,6β,16α,23‐pentahydroxyolean‐12‐en‐28‐oic acid 28‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 3)‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranoside} (3), tacacosides A₁ (4) and B₃ (5). The structures of saponins 1 and 2 were elucidated using a combination of ¹H and ¹³C 1D‐NMR, COSY, TOCSY, gHMBC and gHSQC 2D‐NMR, and FABMS of the natural compounds and their peracetylated derivates, as well as by chemical degradation. Compounds 1–3 are the first examples of saponins containing polygalacic and 16‐hydroxyprotobasic acids found in the genus Sechium, while 4 and 5, which had been characterized partially by NMR, are now characterized in detail. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Enantioselective comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography of lavender essential oil

The enantiomeric composition of several chiral markers in lavender essential oil was studied by flow modulated comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography operated in the reverse flow mode and hyphenated to flame ionization and quadrupole mass spectrometric detection. Two capillary column series were used in this study, 2,3‐di‐O‐ethyl‐6‐O‐tert‐butyldimethylsilyl‐β‐cyclodextrin or 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin, as the chiral column in the first dimension and α polyethylene glycol column in the second dimension. Combining the chromatographic data obtained on these column series, the enantiomeric and excess ratios for α‐pinene, β‐pinene, camphor, lavandulol, borneol, and terpinen‐4‐ol were determined. This maybe a possible route to assess the authenticity of lavender essential oil.     

Two New Cytotoxic Nonsulfated Pentasaccharide Holostane (=20‐Hydroxylanostan‐18‐oic Acid γ‐Lactone) Glycosides from the Sea Cucumber Holothuria grisea

Two new lanostane‐type nonsulfated pentasaccharide triterpene glycosides, 17‐dehydroxyholothurinoside A ( 1 ) and griseaside A ( 2 ), were isolated from the sea cucumber Holothuria grisea. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic methods, including 2D‐NMR and MS experiments, as well as chemical evidence. Compounds 1 and 2 possess the same pentasaccharide moieties but differ slightly in their side chains of the holostane‐type triterpene aglycone. The structures of the two new glycosides were established as (3β,12α)‐22,25‐epoxy‐3‐{(O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐O‐[O‐3‐O‐methyl‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐6‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl)oxy}‐12,20‐dihydroxylanost‐9(11)‐en‐18‐oic acid γ‐lactone ( 1 ) and (3β,12α)‐3‐{(O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐O‐[O‐3‐O‐methyl‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐6‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl)oxy}‐12,20,22‐trihydroxylanost‐9(11)‐en‐18‐oic acid γ‐lactone ( 2 ). The 17‐dehydroxyholothurinoside A ( 1 ) and griseaside A ( 2 ) exhibited significant cytotoxicity against HL‐60, BEL‐7402, Molt‐4, and A‐549 cancer cell lines.     

Synthesis of benzyl O-(2,3,3'-tri-O-acetyl-β-D-apiofuranosyl)-(1→3)-2,4-di-O-benzoyl-α-D-xylopyranoside and its X-ray structure

The protected apiose-containing disaccharide, benzyl O-(2,3, 3'-tri-O-acetyl-β-D-apiofuranosyl)-( 1→3)-2, 4-di-O-benzoyl-α-D-xylopyranoside, was synthesized and its X-ray structure provided.     

Application of high‐performance countercurrent chromatography for the isolation of steroidal saponins from Liriope plathyphylla

High‐performance countercurrent chromatography (HPCCC) with electrospray light‐scattering detection was applied for the first time to isolate a spirostanol and a novel furostanol saponin from Liriope platyphylla. Due to the large differences in K_D values between the two compounds, a two‐step HPCCC method was applied in this study. The primary HPCCC employed methylene chloride/methanol/isopropanol/water (9:6:1:4 v/v, 4 mL/min, normal‐phase mode) conditions to yield a spirostanol saponin ( 1 ). After the primary HPCCC run, the solute retained in the stationary phase (SP extract) in HPCCC column was recovered and subjected to the second HPCCC on the n‐hexane/n‐butanol/water system (1:9:10 v/v, 5 mL/min, reversed‐phase mode) to yield a novel furostanol saponin ( 2 ). The isolated spirostanol saponin was determined to be 25(S)‐ruscogenin 1‐O‐β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl (1→2)‐[β‐d ‐xylopyranosyl (1→3)]‐β‐d ‐fucopyranoside (spicatoside A), and the novel furostanol saponin was elucidated to be 26‐O‐β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl‐25(S)‐furost‐5(6)‐ene‐1β‐3β‐22α‐26‐tetraol‐1‐O‐β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl (1→2)‐[β‐d ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐β‐d ‐fucopyranoside (spicatoside D).     

New Triterpenoidal Saponins Acylated with Monoterpenic Acid from Albizia adianthifolia

Four new triterpenoidal saponins acylated with monoterpenic acid, i.e., adianthifoliosides C, D, E, and F ( 1 – 4 ), besides the two known julibroside III and the monodesmonoterpenyl elliptoside A, were isolated from the roots of Albizia adianthifolia. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of extensive 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR studies and mass spectrometry as 3‐O‐{O‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐O‐β‐d‐ fucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐O‐[β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl}‐21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐6‐{{4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐(β‐D ‐quinovopyranosyloxy)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐β‐d‐ quinovopyranosyl}oxy}‐2‐(hydroxymethyl)‐6‐methylocta‐2,7‐dienoyl}acacic acid 28‐{O‐α‐L ‐arabinofuranosyl‐(1→4)‐O‐[β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl} ester ( 1 ), 21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐6‐{{4‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐(β‐d‐ quinovopyranosyloxy)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐β‐d‐ quinovopyranosyl}oxy}‐2‐(hydroxymethyl)‐6‐methylocta‐2,7‐dienoyl}‐3‐O‐{O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐O‐β‐d‐ fucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐2‐(acetylamino)‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl}acacic acid 28‐{O‐α‐L ‐arabinofuranosyl‐(1→4)‐O‐[β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl} ester ( 2 ), 21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐6‐{{3‐O‐[(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐(β‐d‐ quinovopyranosyloxy)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl]‐β‐d‐ quinovopyranosyl}oxy}‐2,6‐dimethylocta‐2,7‐dienoyl}‐3‐O‐{O‐β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐O‐β‐d‐ fucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐2‐(acetylamino)‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl}acacic acid 28‐{O‐α‐L ‐arabinofuranosyl‐(1→4)‐O‐[β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl} ester ( 3 ), and 3‐O‐{O‐α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐O‐β‐d‐ fucopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐O‐[β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl}‐21‐O‐{(2E,6S)‐2,6‐dimethyl‐6‐(β‐d‐ quinovopyranosyloxy)octa‐2,7‐dienoyl}acacic acid 28‐{O‐α‐L ‐arabinofuranosyl‐(1→4)‐O‐[β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐β‐d‐ glucopyranosyl} ester ( 4 ).     

Brauhenefloroside E and F; acylated flavonol glycosides from Stocksia brauhica Linn

Two new acylated flavonol glycosides, 3‐O‐{[2‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]‐3‐[O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]‐4‐[(6‐O‐p‐coumaroyl)‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]}‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐kaempferol 7‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranoside and 3‐O‐{2‐[(6‐O‐p‐coumaroyl)‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]‐3‐[O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]‐4‐[(6‐O‐p‐coumaroyl)‐O‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl]}‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl‐kaempferol 7‐O‐α‐L ‐rhamnopyranoside, trivially named as brauhenefloroside E (1) and F (2), respectively, were isolated from the fruits of Stocksia brauhica and their structures were elucidated using spectroscopic methods, including 2D NMR experiments. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Diversity of Chemical Constituents from Saxifraga Montana H.

A thorough phytochemical investigation of the whole plant of Saxifraga montana H. afforded a new glucoside, methyl 6″‐O‐(E)‐p‐hydroxycinnamoxyl‐glucosyringate ( 1 ), and seventeen known natural products, 3‐methyl‐6‐methoxy‐3,4‐dihydroisocoumarin‐8‐O‐β‐D‐glucospyranoside ( 2 ), gallic acid ( 3 ), glucosyringic acid ( 4 ), daphnoretin ( 5 ), chamaejasmoside ( 6 ), myricetin ( 7 ), quercetin ( 8 ), quercetin‐3‐O‐β‐D‐galactopyranoside ( 9 ), quercetin‐3‐O‐α‐L‐arabinoside ( 10 ), quercetin‐3‐O‐β‐D‐glucospyranoside ( 11 ), rutin ( 12 ), quercetin‐3‐O‐β‐D‐glucopyranosyl (6‐1) glucopyranoside ( 13 ), ursolic acid ( 14 ), 5,28‐stigmastadien‐3β‐ol ( 15 ), β‐sitosterol ( 16 ), β‐daucosterin ( 17 ), 6′‐palmitoxyl‐β‐daucosterin ( 18 ). On the basis of various spectroscopic methods, especially intensive 2D‐NMR (COSY, HMQC and HMBC), FAB‐MS and HR‐ESI‐MS techniques, their structures were elucidated.     

Synthesis of Laminarin Oligosaccharide Derivatives Having d‐Arabinofuranosyl Side‐Chains

An efficient glycosylation strategy was applied in the synthesis of β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐[α‐d‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1→4)]‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐[α‐d‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1→6)]‐d‐glucopyranose to secure β‐d‐(1→3) glycosidic bond formation between glucopyranosyl residues. The new strategy using a 4,6‐O‐benzylidenated acceptor avoided generation of the α major isomer in the attempted β‐d‐(1→3) glycosylation under standard glycosylation conditions. The hexasaccharide we prepared showed about 30% tumor growth inhibition towards S180 model study.