Structural Diversity of Metallosupramolecular Assemblies from Cu(phen)2+ (phen = 1,10‐Phenanthroline) Building Blocks and 4,4′‐Bipyridine

Attempts to crystal engineer metallosupramolecularcomplexes from Cu(phen)²⁺ building blocks and the prototypical,rod‐like, exo‐bidentate ligand 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) by layering techniques are described. Reactions of Cu(phen)²⁺ (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline) with 4,4′‐bipy in the presence of NO₃^– counterions yielded two distinct, discrete, dinuclear, C_i symmetric, dumbbell‐typecomplexes, [{Cu(NO₃)₂(phen)}₂(4,4′‐bipy)] ( 1 ) and [{Cu(NO₃)(phen)(H₂O)}₂(4,4′‐bipy)](NO₃)₂ ( 2 ), depending upon the mixture of solvents used for crystallization. In compound 1 , a mono‐ and a bidentate nitrato group coordinate to Cu²⁺, whereas in 2 the monodentate nitrato groups are replaced by aqua ligands, which introduce additional hydrogen‐bond donor functionality to the molecule. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis at 296 and 110 K. Upon cooling, a disorder‐order transition occurs, with retention of the space group symmetry. The crystal structure of 2 at room temperature was reported previously [Z.‐X. Du, J.‐X. Li, Acta Cryst. 2007 , E63, m2282]. We have redetermined the crystal structure of 2 at 100 K. A phase transition is not observed for 2 , but the low temperature single‐crystal structure determination is of significantly higher precision than the room temperature study. Both 1 and 2 are obtained phase‐pure, as proven by powder X‐ray diffraction of the bulk materials. Crystals of [Cu(phen)(CF₃SO₃)₂(4,4′‐bipy) · 0.5H₂O]_n ( 3 ), a one‐dimensional coordination polymer, were obtained from [Cu(CF₃SO₃)₂(phen)(H₂O)₂] and 4,4′‐bipy. In 3 , Cu(phen)²⁺ corner units are joined by 4,4′‐bipy via the two vacant cis sites to form polymeric zig‐zag chains, which are tightly packed in the crystal. Compounds 1 – 3 were further studied by infrared spectroscopy.     

A Novel μ2‐(H2O)‐Bridged Double‐Chain Coordination Polymer [Cd(pc)(phen)(H2O)]n with Rhombic Grids (H2pc = pamoic acid,phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline)

A novel coordination polymer [Cd(pc)(phen)(H₂O)]_n (H₂pc = pamoic acid, phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline) has been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that the compound crystallizes in triclinic space group P1. All the Cd^II atoms in the compound are hexacoordinate and are linked by pamoicate ligands to form a one‐dimensional zigzag chain. Furthermore, two adjacent zigzag chains are connected by the μ₂‐(H₂O) molecules to form a double‐chain with rhombic grids. There exist intermolecular C–H ··· π contacts, π–π stacking and hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Compound 1 displays strong fluorescent emission in the solid state at room temperature.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures and Spectrothermal Characterization of a Heptacoordinated Dimeric Salicylato Cadmium(II) Complex with 2,2′‐Azobispyridine (abpy), (µ‐abpy)[Cd(Hsal)2(abpy)]2

µ‐2,2′‐Azobispyridinebis[2,2′‐azobispyridinesalicylato(O)salicylato(O,O′) cadmium(II)], (µ‐abpy)[Cd(Hsal)₂(abpy)]₂ ( I ) was synthesized and characterized by IR and UV/ Vis spectroscopy, thermal analysis, and X‐ray diffraction techniques. Two abpy ligands and two salicylato ligands coordinate to the Cd²⁺ ion in a monocapped trigonal‐prismatic arrangement. The capping atom is the N3 atom. One of the two abpy ligands behaves as a “s‐frame” bridging ligand and adopts a s‐cis/ E/ s‐cis conformation, whereas the other one adopts as a s‐cis/ E/ s‐trans conformation. One of the two salicylato ligands acts as a monodentate ligand, which coordinates with the carboxylate oxygen atom, whereas the other one adopts bidentate coordination through two carboxylate oxygen atoms. The hydroxy groups of salicylato ligands, which coordinate in a monodentate fashion, are disordered over two positions, with occupancies of 0.52 for group A and 0.48 for group B. The decomposition reaction takes place in the temperature range 20–1000 °C under nitrogen. Thermal decomposition of the title complex proceeds in two stages.     

Mixed‐ligand Complexes with 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylato(2‐) and 4,7‐Diphenyl‐1,10‐Phenanthroline Ligands, [MII(pdc)(DPphen)(H2O)]·H2O (M = Co or Cu). Synthesis,Crystal Structures and Properties

Iso‐type [M^II(pdc)(DPphen)(H₂O]·H₂O compounds (M = Co or Cu, pdc = 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylato(2‐) ligand and DPphen = 4,7‐diphenyl‐1,10‐Phenanthroline) were synthesized and studied by X‐ray diffraction, thermal and spectral methods. The N,N′‐equatorial bidentate DPphen‐copper(II) chelation imposes a mer‐N(equatorial)+O₂(apical) conformation to pdc in the coordination polyhedron (type 4+1+1). In the Co(II) derivative, the coordination is of type 1+2+2+1 because of a lesser Jahn‐Teller distortion. In the crystals, π,π‐interligand interactions between phen ligands connect the complex molecules in multi‐stacked chains. Aqua···O(carboxyl) H‐bonding interactions reinforce the stacked chains and build double chains in 1D supramolecular structures parallel to the a axis. Non coordinated water connect these structures by H‐bonds.     

Synthesis,DNA‐Binding and Photocleavage Studies of the Ruthenium(II) Complexes [Ru(phen)2(ppd)]2+ and [Ru(phen)(ppd)2]2+ (ppd=Pteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13(10H,12H)‐dione,phen=1,10‐Phenanthroline)

Two new complexes, [Ru(phen)₂(ppd)]²⁺ ( 1 ) and [Ru(phen)(ppd)₂]²⁺ ( 2 ) (ppd=pteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13(10H,12H)‐dione, phen=1,10‐phenanthroline) were synthesized and characterized by ES‐MS, ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. The intercalative DNA‐binding properties of 1 and 2 were investigated by absorption‐spectroscopy titration, luminescence‐spectroscopy studies, thermal denaturation, and viscosity measurements. The theoretical aspects were further discussed by comparative studies of 1 and 2 by means of DFT calculations and molecular‐orbital theory. Photoactivated cleavage of pBR322 DNA by the two complexes were also studied, and 2 was found to be a much better photocleavage reagent than 1 . The mechanism studies revealed that singlet oxygen and the excited‐states redox potentials of the complex may play an important role in the DNA photocleavage.     

Substituted 2,2′‐Bis(2‐oxidobenzylideneamino)‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐1,1′‐biphenyl Complexes of Zinc

The condensation reaction of 2,2′‐diamino‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐6,6'‐dibromo‐1,1′‐biphenyl with 2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde as well as 5‐methoxy‐, 4‐methoxy‐, and 3‐methoxy‐2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde yields 2,2′‐bis(salicylideneamino)‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐6,6′‐dibromo‐1,1′‐biphenyl ( 1a ) as well as the 5‐, 4‐, and 3‐methoxy‐substituted derivatives 1b , 1c , and 1d , respectively. Deprotonation of substituted 2,2′‐bis(salicylideneamino)‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐1,1′‐biphenyls with diethylzinc yields the corresponding substituted zinc 2,2′‐bis(2‐oxidobenzylideneamino)‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐1,1′‐biphenyls ( 2 ) or zinc 2,2′‐bis(2‐oxidobenzylideneamino)‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐6,6′‐dibromo‐1,1′‐biphenyls ( 3 ). Recrystallization from a mixture of CH₂Cl₂ and methanol can lead to the formation of methanol adducts. The methanol ligands can either bind as Lewis base to the central zinc atom or as Lewis acid via a weak O–H ··· O hydrogen bridge to a phenoxide moiety. Methanol‐free complexes precipitate as dimers with central Zn₂O₂ rings.     

The 3D Supramolecular Compound {[Cu2(L‐val)2(4,4′‐bipy)(H2O)2](NO3)2}n (L‐val = L‐valine anion, 4,4′‐bipy = 4,4′‐bipyridine)

{[Cu₂(L‐val)₂(4,4′‐bipy)(H₂O)₂](NO₃)₂}_n was synthesized and its crystal structure was determined by X‐ray diffraction. In the presence of 4,4′‐bipyridine, deprotoned L‐valine chelates Cu^II ions into coordination layers which were linked into a framework by hydrogen‐bonded chains resulting from nitrate anions and water molecules.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Two One—dimensional Chain Copper Complexes [Cu（TTA）2（4,4‘’—azpy）] and [Cu（TTA）2（3,3‘’—azpy）

Two copper complexes [Cu(TTA)₂(4,4′‐azpy)] (1) and [Cu‐(TTA)₂(3,3′‐azpy)] (2) (HTTA = 1,1,1‐trifluoro‐3‐(2‐thenoyl)‐acetone, 4,4′‐azpy = 4,4′‐azobispyridine, 3,3′‐azpy = 3,3′‐azobispyridine) were synthesized and characterized. The crystal structures were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The crystal 1 belongs to triclinic with space group P1 , a = 0.8515(2) nm, b = 0.9259(2) nm, c = 0.9468(2) nm, a = 66.126(9)°, β = 79.667(9)°, γ = 90.13(1)°, Z = 1, V = 0.6692(2) nm³, D_c = 3.425 g/cm³, γ = 2.113 mm^?1, F(000) = 694, R₁ = 0.0594, wR₂ = 0.1499. The crystal 2 belongs to monoclinic with space group P2₁/c, a = 1.0661(2) nm, b = 1.4296(3) ran, c = 1.0041(3) nm, β = 114.50(3)°, V = 1.3926(5) nm³, Z = 2, D_c = 1.646 g/ cm³, μ = 1.015 mm^?1, F(000) = 694, R₁, = 0.0535, wR₂ = 0.1113. In the crystals of complexes 1 and 2, the copper atoms have distorted octahedral symmetry. The two compounds possess very similar one‐dimensional linear chains linked through the rodlike 4,4′‐azpy ligands or 3,3′‐azpy ligands.     

Syntheses and Characterization of New Copper Complexes with the Heterocyclic Thione,AMTTO. X‐Ray Structures of [Cu(AMTTO)Cl2], [Cu(AMTTO)2]Cl,and [Cu(AMTTO)(PPh3)2Cl] (AMTTO = 4‐Amino‐6‐methyl‐1, 2, 4‐triazine‐3‐thione‐5‐one)

The complexes [Cu(AMTTO)Cl₂] ( 2 ), [Cu(AMTTO)₂]Cl ( 3 ), and [Cu(AMTTO)(PPh₃)₂Cl] ( 4 ) have been prepared and characterized by IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses. Also single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies on compound 2 , 3 and 4 revealed that AMTTO acts in 2 as a bidentate ligand via nitrogen and sulfur atoms, in 3 and 4 as a monodentate via sulfur atoms. Complex 3 was already mentioned in literature, but the structure was not described in detail. The molecules in 2 form infinite chains through additional weak Cu—S interactions along [010] indicating the Jahn‐Teller distortion of the d⁹ ion Cu²⁺. The infinite chains are connected by hydrogen bonding along [100]. Crystal data for 2 at —80°C: monoclinic, space group P2₁/m, a = 666.7(1), b = 609.4(1), c = 1132.6(2) pm, b = 95.46(2)°, Z = 2, R₁ = 0.0365; for 3 at —80°C: orthorhombic, space group Pbcn, a = 1291.2(2), b = 1146.5(1), c = 1000.5(1) pm, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0315; for 4 at —80°C: monoclinic, space group, P2₁/n, a = 879.4(1), b = 1849.3(2), c = 2293.8(3) pm, β = 92.38(1)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0688.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Properties of the Copper(I) Halide Coordination Polymers 2[CuX(μ‐2‐chloropyrazine‐N,N')] (X = Cl,Br), 1[CuI(2‐chloropyrazine‐N)], and [Cu2I2(2‐chloropyrazine)]

The new copper coordination polymers 2[CuX(μ‐2‐chlor‐opyrazine‐N, N')] (X = Cl ( I ), Br ( II ), 1[CuI(2‐chloropyrazine‐N)] ( III ) and [Cu₂I₂(2‐chloropyrazine)] ( IV ) has been prepared by the reaction of the copper(I) halides with 2‐chloropyrazine at roomtemperature or under hydrothermal conditions. The crystal structures of the 1:1 compounds I and II consist of zig‐zag CuX single chains running parallel to the crystallographic a‐axis which are linked by the 2‐chloropyrazine spacer molecules to sheets parallel to (010). For the iodine compound III a one‐dimensional structure is found which consists of CuX double chains running parallel to the crystallographic a‐axis. The thermic properties of all compounds were investigated in different gas atmospheres using simultaneously differential thermal analysis and thermogravimetry (DTA‐TG) as well as temperature resolved X‐ray powder diffraction. On heating, the 1:1 compounds I and II decompose directly to the corresponding copper(I) Halides, whereas the thermal decomposition of III occcur via IV as an intermediate.     

Cobalt (II) and Copper (I) Complexes of Rigid Bidentate [N‐(2, 6‐Diisopropyl‐phenyl)imino]acenapthenone Ligand: Synthesis and Structural Studies

The cobalt(II) complex [CoCl₂(2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO)]₂ ( 1 ) of rigid unsymmetrical imine, carbonyl mixed ligand [N‐(2, 6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐imino]acenapthenone] (2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO) ( L1 ) can be achieved by the reaction of CoCl₂ and neutral [N‐(2, 6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐imino]acenapthenone] ligand. When ligand L1 reacted with CuCl in dichloromethane solution, only nitrogen coordinated copper complex [CuCl(2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO)] ( 2 ) was obtained. In the solid‐state structure, compound 1 is dimeric through the chelating two μ₂ chlorine atoms and each cobalt atom adopts either a distorted trigonal bipyramidal or a distorted square pyramidal arrangement. In contrast, the molecular structure of compound 2 reveals that copper is coordinated by imino nitrogen and adopts a linear arrangement around the central metal atom. The crystal structure of the rigid bidentate mixed nitrogen and oxygen ligand (2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO) ( L1 ) is also reported.     

A 3D Metal‐organic Framework Containing [Cd(3‐CPOA)]n (3‐CPOA2– = 3‐Carboxyphenoxyacetato Dianion) Expanded by 4,4′‐Bipyridine

The hydrothermal reaction of Cd(NO₃) · 4H₂O with 4,4′‐bipyridine (bipy) and 3‐carboxyphenoxyacetatic acid (3‐H₂CPOA) afforded a 3D metal‐organic framework (MOF) [Cd(3‐CPOA)(bipy)]_n · 3.5nH₂O, which was characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analyses, and X‐ray diffraction. The single‐crystal structural analysis revealed that it has a Cds‐type topological network with 1D channels that contain encapsulated water molecular tapes.     

Kristallstrukturen der Terpyridin-Komplexe [Cd(terpy)Cl2], [Cu(terpy)(CN)Cl] und [Cu(terpy)][Cu(CN)3] · H2O

Crystal Structures of the Terpyridine Complexes [Cd(terpy)Cl₂], [Cu(terpy)(CN)Cl], and [Cu(terpy)][Cu(CN)₃] · H₂O By reaction of cadmium chloride with 2,2′ : 6′,2″-terpyridine (“terpy”) in water/acetone crystals of [Cd(terpy)Cl₂] ( 1) were formed. The compound crystallizes monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, a = 1111.70(10), b = 823.10(7), c = 1643.00(14) pm, β = 93.913(1)°, Z = 4. Starting from mixtures of different molar ratios of copper(II) chloride, terpyridine, and KCN in water/methanole, two complexes of different composition were obtained. At the molar ratio of 1 : 1 : 2 a copper(II) coordination compound with both halide and pseudohalide ligands, [Cu(terpy)(CN)Cl] ( 2 ), was formed which also crystallizes monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 1065.6(3), b = 824.6(2), c = 1644.5(7) pm, β = 98.214(3)°, Z = 4. At a molar ratio of 1 : 1 : 10 a partial reduction of copper(II) occured with formation of a mixed valency compound [Cu(terpy)][Cu(CN)₃] · H₂O ( 3 ) which crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P6₅22, with a = b = 800.29(1), c = 4771.05(7) pm, Z = 6. Compounds 1 and 2 are structurally similar, the coordination of the metal atoms is square pyramidal. Networks are formed by hydrogen bridges. In 3 the copper(II) ions show a distorted square planar coordination by the three N atoms of the terpy ligand and one N atom of a bridging CN^– group, the copper(I) atoms, however, show trigonal planar coordination by three CN^– ligands to which the water molecules are bonded by hydrogen bridges. Thus helical chains are formed which stretch in the direction of the screw axes. The EPR spectrum of 3 was measured.     

Homo‐ and Heteropentanuclear Coordination Compounds with Td Symmetry – the Solid State Structures of [MZn4(L)4(L′)6] (M = CoII or Zn; L = chloride or acac; L′ = 1,2,3‐benzotriazolate)

The syntheses of homo‐ and heteropentanuclear coordination compounds with the molecular formulae [MZn₄(L)₄(L′)₆] (M = Co^II or Zn; L = chloride or acac; L′ = 1,2,3‐benzotriazolate) are reported. These compounds display a highly symmetric coordination unit consisting of a central metal ion (M = Co^II or Zn) which is octahedrally coordinated by 6 tridentate benzotriazolate‐type ligands via their N(2) donor atom. The benzotriazolate ligands span the edges of an imaginary tetrahedron thus providing four coordination sites at the corners of the tetrahedron, which are then filled by four zinc ions. The coordination shell of the latter are completed by bidentate acetylacetonate (acac) ligands or by chloride anions, respectively. The solid state structures of two homopentanuclear metal complexes, namely [Zn₅(acac)₄(bta)₆]·4C₆H₁₂ ( 1 ) (acacH = acetylacetone; btaH = 1,2,3‐benzotriazole), and [Zn₅Cl₄(Me₂bta)₆]·2DMF ( 2 ) (Me₂btaH = 5,6‐dimethyl‐1,2,3‐benzotriazole) were determined by single crystal X‐ray structure analysis. The heteropentanuclear metal complex [Co^IIZn₄Cl₄(Me₂bta)₆]·2DMF ( 3 ) is isostructural with compound 2 . Compound 1 was synthesized from stoichiometric amounts of Zn(acac)₂ and btaH employing dichloromethane as solvent. The synthesis of compound 2 requires addition of an auxiliary base to the DMF solution of anhydrous ZnCl₂ and Me₂btaH. For compound 3 a stoichiometric ratio of Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, anhydrous ZnCl₂ and Me₂btaH was employed during synthesis. Phase purity of all compounds was proved by X‐ray powder diffraction (XRPD) analysis, IR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. Crystal data: for 1 (C₈₀H₁₀₀N₁₈O₈Zn₅): monoclinic, space group P2₁/c with a = 23.781(5) Å, b = 16.000(3) Å, c = 25.170(5) Å, β = 115.29(3)°, V = 8659(3) ų, Z = 4, ρ = 1.357 g cm^?3. For 2 (C₅₄H₆₂Cl₄N₂₀O₂Zn₅): cubic, space group with a = 23.367(3) Å, V = 12759(3) ų, Z = 8, ρ = 1.553 g cm^?3. For 3 (C₅₄H₆₂Cl₄CoN₂₀O₂Zn₄): cubic, space group with a = 23.443(3) Å, V = 12884(3) ų, Z = 8, ρ = 1.532 g cm^?3.     

Reactivity of 2,2′‐Bis(2N‐(1,1′,3,3′‐tetramethyl‐guanidino))diphenylene‐amine with CuI and [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6]: Benzimidazole Formation vs. Cu Oxidation

The reaction of 2,2′‐Bis(2N‐(1,1′,3,3′‐tetramethyl‐guanidino))diphenylene‐amine (TMG₂PA) ( 1 ) with CuI in MeCN results in the formation of [Cu^II(TMG₂PA^amid)I] ( 2 ) indicatingthat Cu^I is the target of an oxidative attack of the N‐H proton of the ligand which itself is converted to molecular hydrogen. In contrast, if [Cu(MeCN)₄][PF₆] is used as the Cu^I source, [Cu^I₂(TMGbenz)₂][PF₆]₂ ( 3 ) is obtained instead. The use of the non‐coordinating counterion [PF₆]^– apparently prevents Cu^I from oxidation but induces itself a cyclisation reaction within the ligand which results in the formation of a benzimidazole‐guanidine ligand.     

Molekülstruktur und thermische Stabilität des metallacyclischen Platin(II)‐Komplexes [Li(TMEDA)]2Pt(CH2CMe2CMe2CH2)2

Molecular Structure and Thermal Stability of the Metallacyclic Platinum(II) Complex [Li(TMEDA)]₂Pt(CH₂CMe₂CMe₂CH₂)₂ The X‐ray investigation at the “ate‐complex” [Li(TMEDA)]₂Pt(CH₂CMe₂CMe₂CH₂)₂ ( 1 ) revealed a new structure type of homoleptic organometallic compounds of platinum(II). Differences of the molecular structure of the “ate‐complex” [Li(TMEDA)]₂Pt(CH₂CH₂CH₂CH₂)₂ ( 2 ) as well as similarities to the structure of the homologeous “ate‐complex” of nickel(II) [Li(TMEDA)]₂Ni(CH₂CMe₂CMe₂CH₂)₂ ( 3 ) are described. A possible mechanism of the thermal decomposition of the complex 1 is discussed.     

Alkalimetalltetraethinylozincate und ‐cadmate AI2M(C2H)4 (AI = Na — Cs,M = Zn,Cd): Synthese,Kristallstruktur und spektroskopische Eigenschaften

Alkali Metal Tetraethinylozincates and ‐cadmates A^I₂M(C₂H)₄ (A^I = Na — Cs, M = Zn, Cd): Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Spectroscopic Properties By reaction of A^IC₂H (A^I = Na — Cs) with divalent zinc and cadmium salts in liquid ammonia the alkali metal tetraethinylozincates and ‐cadmates A^I₂M(C₂H)₄ (M = Zn, Cd) were accessible as polycrystalline powders. While Na₂M(C₂H)₄ is amorphous to X‐rays and the crystal structure of Cs₂Zn(C₂H)₄ could not be solved up to now, the remaining compounds are isotypic to the already known crystal structures of the potassium compounds, as was deduced from powder diffraction with X‐rays and synchrotron radiation. They crystallise in the tetragonal space group I4₁a, contain [M(C₂H)₄]^2— tetrahedra and show structural relationships to the scheelit and anatas structure types. Raman spectroscopic investigations confirm the existence of tetrahedral fragments with C‐C triple bonds in the alkali as well as in the amorphous alkaline earth metal compounds A^IIM(C₂H)₄ (A^II = Mg — Ba, M = Zn, Cd).     

Complex Formation of 2, 6‐Bis‐(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)pyridine with AlIII,FeIII and CuII

Complex formation of 2, 6‐bis(2′‐hydroxyphenyl)pyridine (H₂Lⁱ) with Fe³⁺ and Cu²⁺ was investigated in a H₂O/DMSO medium (mole fraction x_DMSO = 0.2) by potentiometric and spectrophotometric methods. The pK_a values of [H₃Lⁱ]⁺ are 2.25, 10.51 and 14.0 (25 °C, 0.1 M KCl). The formation constants of [Fe^III(Lⁱ)]⁺ and [Cu^II(Lⁱ)] (25 °C, 0.1 M KCl) are log β₁ = 21.5 for Fe³⁺ and log β₁ = 18.5 for Cu²⁺. The crystal structures of [Al(Lⁱ)₂Na(EtOH)₃], [Fe(Lⁱ)₂Na(EtOH)₃], and [Cu(Lⁱ)(py)]₂ were investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses. The Fe^III and the Al^III compound are isotypic and crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. Al‐compound (215 K): a = 12.599(3) Å, b = 16.653(3) Å, c = 17.525(4) Å, β = 100.27(3)°, Z = 4 for C₄₀H₄₀AlN₂NaO₇; Fe‐compound (293 K): a = 12.753(3) Å, b = 16.715(3) Å, c = 17.493(3) Å, β = 99.68(3)°, Z = 4 for C₄₀H₄₀FeN₂NaO₇. Both compounds contain a homoleptic, anionic bis‐complex [M(Lⁱ)₂]^‐ of approximate D₂ symmetry. The Cu compound crystallized as an uncharged, dinuclear and centrosymmetric [Cu(Lⁱ)(py)]₂ complex in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with (293 K) a = 13.386(3) Å, b = 9.368(2) Å, c = 14.656(3) Å, β = 100.65(3)°, Z = 2 for C₄₄H₃₂Cu₂N₄O₄. The structural properties and in particular the possible influence of the ligand geometry on the stability of the metal complexes is discussed.     

Photochemistry of RuII 4,4′‐Bi‐1,2,3‐triazolyl (btz) Complexes: Crystallographic Characterization of the Photoreactive Ligand‐Loss Intermediate trans‐[Ru(bpy)(κ2‐btz)(κ1‐btz)(NCMe)]2+

We report the unprecedented observation and unequivocal crystallographic characterization of the meta‐stable ligand loss intermediate solvento complex trans‐[Ru(bpy)(κ²‐btz)(κ¹‐btz)(NCMe)]²⁺ ( 1 a ) that contains a monodentate chelate ligand. This and analogous complexes can be observed during the photolysis reactions of a family of complexes of the form [Ru($\widehat{NN}$ )(btz)₂]²⁺ ( 1 a – d : btz=1,1′‐dibenzyl‐4,4′‐bi‐1,2,3‐triazolyl; $\widehat{NN}$ =a) 2,2′‐bipyridyl (bpy), b) 4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridyl (dmbpy), c) 4,4′‐dimethoxy‐2,2′‐bipyridyl (dmeobpy), d) 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen)). In acetonitrile solutions, 1 a – d eventually convert to the bis‐solvento complexes trans‐[Ru($\widehat{NN}$ )(btz)(NCMe)₂]²⁺ ( 3 a – d ) along with one equivalent of free btz, in a process in which the remaining coordinated bidentate ligands undergo a new rearrangement such that they become coplanar. X‐ray crystal structure of 3 a and 3 d confirmed the co‐planar arrangement of the $\widehat{NN}$ and btz ligands and the trans coordination of two solvent molecules. These conversions proceed via the observed intermediate complexes 2 a – d , which are formed quantitatively from 1 a – d in a matter of minutes and to which they slowly revert back on being left to stand in the dark over several days. The remarkably long lifetime of the intermediate complexes (>12 h at 40 °C) allowed the isolation of 2 a in the solid state, and the complex to be crystallographically characterized. Similarly to the structures adopted by complexes 3 a and d , the bpy and κ²‐btz ligands in 2 a coordinate in a square‐planar fashion with the second monodentate btz ligand coordinated trans to an acetonitrile ligand.     

Controlling Metal–Ligand–Metal Oxidation State Combinations by Ancillary Ligand (L) Variation in the Redox Systems [L2Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL2]n,boptz=3,6‐bis(2‐oxidophenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine,and L=acetylacetonate, 2,2′‐bipyridine,or 2‐phenylazopyridine

The new compounds [(acac)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(acac)₂] ( 1 ), [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ‐(ClO₄)₂), and [(pap)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(pap)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 3 ‐(ClO₄)₂) were obtained from 3,6‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (H₂boptz), the crystal structure analysis of which is reported. Compound 1 contains two antiferromagnetically coupled (J=?36.7 cm^?1) Ru^III centers. We have investigated the role of both the donor and acceptor functions containing the boptz^2? bridging ligand in combination with the electronically different ancillary ligands (donating acac^?, moderately π‐accepting bpy, and strongly π‐accepting pap; acac=acetylacetonate, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine pap=2‐phenylazopyridine) by using cyclic voltammetry, spectroelectrochemistry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for several in situ accessible redox states. We found that metal–ligand–metal oxidation state combinations remain invariant to ancillary ligand change in some instances; however, three isoelectronic paramagnetic cores Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru showed remarkable differences. The excellent tolerance of the bpy co ‐ ligand for both Ru^III and Ru^II is demonstrated by the adoption of the mixed ‐ valent form in [L₂Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL₂]³⁺, L=bpy, whereas the corresponding system with pap stabilizes the Ru^II states to yield a phenoxyl radical ligand and the compound with L=acac^? contains two Ru^III centers connected by a tetrazine radical‐anion bridge.