大体积搅拌棒吸附萃取技术与热脱附-气相色谱-质谱法测定地表水中多环芳烃

基于搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)技术建立了气相色谱-质谱测定地表水中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)的分析方法。该法采用多搅拌吸附棒同时富集,依次热脱附冷聚焦后进样的方式有效解决了搅拌棒吸附时间长、富集水样体积小等问题。优化后的结果表明,在0.2~10 ng/L范围内(萘为0.5~10 ng/L范围),16种PAHs的线性关系良好,相关系数(r)均0.99,方法检出限(MDL)为0.03~0.20 ng/L(萘为0.50 ng/L)。用该方法对钱塘江流域地表水进行测定,共检测出11种PAHs,含量为0.13~1.57 ng/L,不同添加水平下的加标回收率为75.6%~108.9%。该法可应用于地表水样品中该类物质的超痕量检测。     

竹炭固相萃取/气相色谱-质谱联用对环境水样中16种多环芳烃的测定

以竹炭为固相萃取吸附材料,考察了其对环境水样中16种多环芳烃的吸附富集能力,采用DB-35MS弹性石英毛细管色谱柱对16种多环芳烃进行分离,气相色谱-质谱联用法对多环芳烃进行定性及定量分析.结果表明,1 000 mg竹炭作为固相萃取吸附剂,10 mL二氯甲烷作为洗脱剂,上样速率5 mL/min,水样中甲醇体积分数为15%的条件下,16种多环芳烃有较好的回收率,竹炭固相萃取柱的穿透体积大于500 mL,通过实验比较竹炭的萃取回收率优于商品化的C18固相萃取柱.16种多环芳烃的质量浓度在10 ～500 ng/L范围内与峰面积的线性关系良好(苯并(k)荧蒽,苯并(a)芘,二苯并(a,h)蒽,苯并(g,h,i)苝为25 ～500 ng/L),相关系数为0.983 6 ～0.998 4.方法的检出限为0.6 ～8.0 ng/L,实际水样的加标回收率为67% ～113%,相对标准偏差为2.1% ～11.3%.通过对白沙河河水的分析表明,该方法能够满足实际水样的测定,竹炭可以作为固相萃取材料应用于水中16种多环芳烃的分析测定.     

固相萃取-气相色谱串联质谱法测定饮用水中的多环芳烃和邻苯二甲酸酯

采用固相萃取、中性硅胶-中性氧化铝复合柱对水样进行提取和净化,采用气相色谱串联质谱法测定水样中的16种多环芳烃和6种邻苯二甲酸酯.该方法对水样中的多环芳烃和邻苯二甲酸酯的检测限分别为0.10～0.26 ng/L和0.20～2.0 ng/L,加标回收率分别在88.6％～111.7％和85.3％～110.5％之间,样品重复测定6次,相对标准偏差(RSD)均小于15％.实验结果表明,该方法灵敏度高、重复性好、定量准确,可用于饮用水中多环芳烃和邻苯二甲酸酯的测定.     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法测定水中多环芳烃

用分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法测定水样中的16种多环芳烃(PAHs)。通过实验确定最佳萃取条件为:20μL四氯化碳作萃取剂,1.0 mL乙腈作分散剂,超声萃取1 min。在优化条件下,多环芳烃的富集倍数达到216～511,方法在0.05～50μg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数(R2)在0.9873～0.9983之间,检出限为0.0020～0.14μg/L。相对标准偏差(RSD)在3.82%～12.45%(n=6)之间。该方法成功用于实际水样中痕量多环芳烃的测定。     

在线固相萃取-液相色谱法直接测定水中超痕量多环芳烃

建立了在线固相萃取-液相色谱直接测定水体中16种超痕量多环芳烃（PAHs）的方法。水样经高速离心后，加入适量甲醇，配制成40%（体积分数）甲醇水溶液，直接进样2 mL至在线固相萃取流路，进行萃取富集，再通过阀切换将洗脱的PAHs转移至分析流路进行分离检测。16种PAHs在各自范围内线性关系良好，相关系数均大于0.996；方法的检出限为0.14~12.50 ng/L，其中苯并[a]芘（B（a）P）的检出限为0.38 ng/L。实际水样在10、40和200 ng/L加标水平下的加标回收率为76.1%~134.9%，RSD为0.3%~16.6%。B（a）P在1 ng/L加标水平下的回收率为71.8%~92.7%，RSD为3.9%。结果表明，该方法操作简单，灵敏度高，溶剂消耗量少，可满足水样中PAHs，尤其是B（a）P的超痕量分析要求。     

分散固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定蔬菜中多环芳烃及卤代多环芳烃

建立了同时检测蔬菜中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)和11种卤代多环芳烃(X-PAHs)污染水平的分散固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)分析方法。样品中的多环芳烃和卤代多环芳烃经正己烷提取,N-丙基乙二胺吸附剂(PSA)和十八烷基键合硅胶吸附剂(C18)分散固相萃取净化剂净化,气相色谱-串联质谱方法测定,外标法定量。16种PAHs和11种X-PAHs在50,100和200μg/kg添加浓度下的回收率为74.7%～115.1%,相对标准偏差为1.6%～15.3%,方法检出限为0.03～7.4μg/kg。     

β-环糊精对燃煤焦油和烟气中环芳烃的清除作用

采用三维荧光法测定了7处产地煤样燃烧的焦油和烟气中多环芳烃（PAHs）的含量,焦油中PAHs含量为0.201～0.419 mg/g,烟气中PAHs含量为1.1～3.2 μg/g;测试了β-环糊精（β-CD）溶液对煤烟气中多环芳烃的清除作用,最高去除率可达65.6%。 结果表明：不同产地煤的烟气中PAHs含量不同, 煤焦油中PAHs浓度(mol/L)在10-5数量级,远高于烟气中的浓度(mol/L,10-7数量级)。 用β-CD去除不同产地煤燃烧烟气中多环芳烃的去除率不同。 所选7种煤平均清除率为38.4%。 β-CD溶液有希望成为煤烟气中多环芳烃的清除剂。     

加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化-气相色谱/质谱法测定沉积物中多氯联苯和多环芳烃

建立了加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化-气相色谱/三重四极杆串联质谱联用(ASE-SPE-GC-QqQ-MS/MS)法同时测定沉积物中28种多氯联苯(PCBs)和16种多环芳烃(PAHs)。对萃取、净化及仪器分析条件进行了优化。优化条件为:ASE萃取温度90℃,萃取时间6 min;净化小柱为硅胶-Florisil固相复合柱(填料自下而上为弗罗里硅土、0.7 g活化硅胶、1 g无水硫酸钠);洗脱溶液为丙酮-正己烷(1∶19,V/V)混合溶液,洗脱速率为0.6 mL/min。PCBs和PAHs在2～500μg/L和5～1000μg/L浓度范围内的线性相关系数(R2)分别为0.9987～0.9999和0.9939～0.9999;PCBs和PAHs方法检出限分别为0.001～0.08 ng/g和0.07～0.45 ng/g;定量限为0.003～0.25 ng/g和0.24～1.67 ng/g;实际样品平均加标回收率为95.6%～125.7%和70.4%～124.7%;方法相对标准偏差(n=6)为0.7%～6.4%和1.1%～12.8%。运用本方法对滇池入湖河口表层沉积物样品进行测定,该区域PCBs单体浓度为n.d.(未检出)～0.13 ng/g,PAHs单体浓度为0.79～131.12 ng/g。     

使用C18固相萃取膜-色质联用定量分析饮用水中痕量多环芳烃的初步研究

参照美国EPA525.1方法,C18-固相萃取膜萃取饮用水中的有机物,利用GC/MS法鉴定多环芳烃(PAHs),使用16种多环芳烃混合标准样绘制标准曲线,以内标法对PAHs进行定量分析.采用本方法研究某水厂经过深度处理后的出厂水中的7种多环芳烃的含量,PAHs的平均回收率为94.0%～97.7%.检测限为0.001μg/L.     

搅拌子固相吸附-热脱附-气相色谱/质谱/质谱法快速测定空气中多环芳烃

利用聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)涂层的搅拌子作为大气被动采样器,建立了搅拌子固相吸附-热脱附-气相色谱/质谱/质谱联用法(SBSE-TD-GC/MS/MS)快速测定室内空气中多环芳烃的方法。在搅拌子表面涂渍标准样品,待溶剂挥发后放于脱附管内,在多反应监测模式(MRM)下,对多环芳烃子离子、碰撞能量、热脱附参数(脱附温度300℃,冷阱捕集温度-60℃和脱附时间6 min)等条件进行了优化,并建立标准曲线;以12种氘代同位素PAHs为内标,建立了多窗口下16种美国环保署优先检测多环芳烃的分析方法,方法回收率在45.1%~109%之间,检出限为0.020~0.054 ng。利用本方法对模拟燃煤前后室内大气中悬挂搅拌子中的多环芳烃进行了被动吸附与检测,燃煤前后室内大气样品中16种多环芳烃含量分别为4.24~5.32 ng和172~200 ng。     

应用搅拌棒吸附萃取-热脱附-气相色谱-质谱测定烟叶和茶叶中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

应用搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)技术分别萃取烟叶和茶叶中的5种拟除虫菊酯,并利用热脱附系统将萃取到的物质进行热脱附,然后通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)进行分析测定。实验过程中对影响SBSE的因素及影响热脱附的条件进行了优化。在优化条件下,采用外标法分别对烟叶和茶叶中的5种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留进行了定量分析。结果表明,烟叶中5种拟除虫菊酯的检出限范围为3.3~11.4 ng,加标回收率为94.8%~103.4%,6次测定的相对标准偏差（RSD）为5.3%~8.6%;茶叶中5种拟除虫菊酯的检出限范围为4.2~10.5 ng,加标回收率为98.2%~110.1%,6次测定的RSD为5.0%~9.6%。实验证明该法具有较高的准确度、灵敏度和较好的重现性,可用于烟叶和茶叶中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的快速分析测定。     

气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱法检测环境空气中的多环芳烃

建立了气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱检测环境空气中多环芳烃的方法,并利用同位素稀释法对多环芳烃进行了测定。将该方法应用于华南地区某大型石化企业周边环境空气中多环芳烃的检测,并与气相色谱-质谱方法进行了对比。结果表明,该方法的仪器检出限（0.01~0.15 μg/L）和定量限（0.03~1.5 μg/L）均优于气相色谱-质谱法（0.1~0.8 μg/L和0.3~3.5 μg/L）,并有更好的灵敏度与选择性。当利用气相色谱-质谱作为检测手段时,回收率指示物氘代菲和进样内标六甲基苯均受到了杂质的严重干扰,影响了定量结果的准确性,而三重四极杆串联质谱很好地解决了这些问题。实际样品分析时,标准曲线中16种多环芳烃相对响应因子的相对标准偏差为2.60%~15.6%,氘代化合物的回收率为55.2%~82.3%,空白加标样品的回收率为98.9%~111%,平行样品的相对标准偏差为6.50%~18.4%,采样空白含量范围为未检出~44.3 pg/m³,实验室空白含量范围为未检出~36.5 pg/m³。上述研究表明,分析环境空气中的多环芳烃时,气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱方法值得推广。     

中空结构的双金属有机骨架材料作为固相微萃取纤维涂层用于多环芳烃的高灵敏检测

环境样品中多环芳烃(PAHs)含量较低且样品基质复杂,直接利用仪器进行含量测定比较困难,因此在仪器分析之前需要对环境样品进行必要的前处理。大多数前处理技术的萃取效率取决于萃取材料的特性。目前,金属有机骨架材料(MOFs)作为一种由金属离子与有机配体自组装而成的多孔材料,已经被用作固相微萃取(SPME)的涂层材料应用于PAHs的萃取,但是这些MOFs涂层材料由于目标物较难达到其深层的吸附位点,使得萃取过程往往需要较长的平衡时间;此外,大多数MOFs由单金属离子配位构成,能够提供的开放金属活性位点种类比较单一,较难获得最佳的萃取性能。这些问题在一定程度上限制了MOFs材料在SPME领域的应用。该研究制备了一种中空结构的双金属有机骨架材料(H-BiMOF),并将其作为SPME的涂层材料,用于萃取环境样品中痕量的PAHs。由于中空的结构和双金属的组成,H-BiMOF涂层材料拥有比表面积利用率高、传质距离短等优点,可以使萃取过程快速地达到平衡。同时,双金属的引入提供了种类丰富的金属活性位点,提高了对PAHs这类富电子云目标物的萃取效率。与气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)相结合,建立了一种用于环境水样中PAHs分析的新方法。所建立的分析方法具有检出限低(0.01~0.08 ng/L)、线性范围宽(0.03~500.0 ng/L)、重复性良好(相对标准偏差≤9.8%, n=5)等优点,并成功地用于实际湖水样品中7种PAHs的检测。实验结果表明,所建立的分析方法适用于环境样品中PAHs的分析与监测。     

Trace analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in suspended particulate matter by accelerated solvent extraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

An analytical procedure based on extraction by accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis has been developed for the determination of particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from large-volume water samples (20 L). The effect of temperature and number of cycles on the efficiency of ASE was investigated: the best results were obtained by using a temperature of 100°C and one static cycle. A mixture of hexane/acetone 1:1 (v/v) was used as extraction solvent. Mean total method recovery under optimized conditions was 85%. The developed methodology was applied to the analysis of suspended particulate matter from Lake Maggiore waters (north of Italy). Mean PAH concentrations in suspended particulate matter from Lake Maggiore ranged from 0.2 ng L⁻¹ for anthracene to 18.7 ng L⁻¹ for naphthalene.     

高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定表层水体中5类40种抗生素

建立了固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱（SPE-HPLC-MS/MS）同时检测表层水中5类40种抗生素的分析方法。水样经过滤、固相萃取柱富集净化后，以乙腈-0.2%（v/v）甲酸水溶液为流动相进行梯度洗脱，采用电喷雾电离源，在多反应监测、正离子模式进行定性定量分析。结果显示，40种抗生素在1~200 μg/L水平下线性关系良好，平均加标回收率为41.3%~112.6%。采用该方法对长江南京段表层水体进行检测，共检出13种抗生素，含量为13.4~780.5 ng/L，其中喹诺酮类抗生素恩诺沙星检出率达100%，大环内酯类抗生素克林霉素最高检出水平达739.4 ng/L。该法高效、灵敏、可靠，可用于实际水样中多种抗生素的分析。     

Trace analysis of diethylstilbestrol, dienestrol and hexestrol in environmental water by Nylon 6 nanofibers mat-based solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

A simple, rapid and sensitive method for the determination of diethylstilbestrol (DES), dienestrol (DE) and hexestrol (HEX) was developed by using the Nylon 6 nanofibers mat-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). These estrogens were separated within 8 min by LC using an ODS column and methanol/water (80/20, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min(-1). Electrospray ionization conditions in the negative ion mode were optimized for MS detection of the estrogens. Under the optimum SPE conditions, all target analytes in 50 mL environmental water samples can be completely extracted by 1.5 mg Nylon 6 nanofibers mat at flow rate of 3.0 mL min(-1) and easily eluted by passage of 500 μL mobile phase. By using the novel SPE-LC/MS method, good linearity of the calibration curve (r(2) ≥ 0.9992) was obtained in the concentration range from 0.10 ng L(-1) to 1.0 mg L(-1) (except for DE which was 0.20 ng L(-1) to 1.0 mg L(-1)) for all analytes examined. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) of the three estrogens ranged from 0.05 ng L(-1) to 0.10 ng L(-1). This method was applied successfully to the analysis of environmental water samples without any other pretreatment and interference peaks. Several water samples were collected from Jinchuan River and Xuanwu Lake, and in Jinchuan River water DES was detected at 0.13 ng L(-1). The recoveries of estrogens spiked into tap water were above 98.2%, and the relative standard deviations were below 4.78%.     

PDMS Rod-SBSE System Coupled with Gas Chromatography for Determination of PAHs in Aqueous Samples

A method for the analysis of trace polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) in aqueous samples has been established by polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS) rod aided stir bar sorptive extraction(SBSE). The homemade PDMS rod has a size of 30 mm?3 mm o.d. with a volume of ca. 200 ?L, stable in thermal desorption process. The enriched PAHs by the PDMS rod were released in a homemade thermal desorption system coupled with gas chromatography. Experimental parameters for extraction of six PAHs were optimized including extraction time, pH, ionic strength and temperature of solution. The procedure has good recoveries of 80.0%―100.3% and very low limits of detection of 4.0―33 ng/L. PAHs in rain and river water were analyzed by this method.     

An experimental design approach to optimise the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from rainfall water using stir bar sorptive extraction and high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection

Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) followed by HPLC-fluorescence detection (FLD) was optimised for analysing 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from water samples, especially rainfall water with low PAH content. The literature data described widely different experimental conditions for the extraction of PAHs by SBSE. A chemometric approach was therefore used to evaluate the statistically influential and/or interacting factors, among those described in the literature, and to find the best extraction and desorption conditions. Among six factors studied in a 2(6-2) fractional factorial design, only sample volume, extraction time and the interaction between both of them had significant effects on the PAH extraction recoveries. Optimal sample volume of 10 mL and extraction time of 140 min were obtained with a response surface design. For the desorption conditions, a Box-Behnken design showed that desorption time, temperature and PAH concentrations had significant effects. The best conditions were two successive desorptions with 100 microL of acetonitrile for 25 min at 50 degrees C. The optimised method was repeatable (RSD< or =5.3% for 50 ng L(-1) spiked water and < or =12.8% for 5 ng L(-1) spiked water), linear (R(2)> or =0.9956), with quantitative absolute recoveries (> or =87.8% for 50 ng L(-1) spiked water), and with the LOD between 0.2 and 1.5 ng L(-1). The optimised method was successfully applied to six-rainfall water samples collected in a suburban area. The total PAHs concentrations studied ranged from 31 to 105.1 ng L(-1). Seasonal variation was observed and on average three PAHs were at the highest concentrations (phenanthrene, fluoranthene and pyrene).