Chiral Fluorinated α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Enantioselective Synthesis and Electrophilic Capture,Racemization Dynamics,and Structure

Enantiomerically pure triflones R¹CH(R²)SO₂CF₃ have been synthesized starting from the corresponding chiral alcohols via thiols and trifluoromethylsulfanes. Key steps of the syntheses of the sulfanes are the photochemical trifluoromethylation of the thiols with CF₃Hal (Hal=halide) or substitution of alkoxyphosphinediamines with CF₃SSCF₃. The deprotonation of RCH(Me)SO₂CF₃ (R=CH₂Ph, iHex) with nBuLi with the formation of salts [RC(Me)? SO₂CF₃]Li and their electrophilic capture both occurred with high enantioselectivities. Displacement of the SO₂CF₃ group of (S)‐MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)SO₂CF₃ (95 % ee) by an ethyl group through the reaction with AlEt₃ gave alkane MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)Et of 96 % ee. Racemization of salts [R¹C(R²)SO₂CF₃]Li follows first‐order kinetics and is mainly an enthalpic process with small negative activation entropy as revealed by polarimetry and dynamic NMR (DNMR) spectroscopy. This is in accordance with a C_α? S bond rotation as the rate‐determining step. Lithium α‐(S)‐trifluoromethyl‐ and α‐(S)‐nonafluorobutylsulfonyl carbanion salts have a much higher racemization barrier than the corresponding α‐(S)‐tert‐butylsulfonyl carbanion salts. Whereas [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂tBu]Li/DMPU (DMPU = dimethylpropylurea) has a half‐life of racemization at ?105 °C of 2.4 h, that of [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li at ?78 °C is 30 d. DNMR spectroscopy of amides (PhCH₂)₂NSO₂CF₃ and (PhCH₂)N(Ph)SO₂CF₃ gave N? S rotational barriers that seem to be distinctly higher than those of nonfluorinated sulfonamides. NMR spectroscopy of [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂R]M (M=Li, K, NBu₄; R=CF₃, tBu) shows for both salts a confinement of the negative charge mainly to the C_α atom and a significant benzylic stabilization that is weaker in the trifluoromethylsulfonyl carbanion. According to crystal structure analyses, the carbanions of salts {[PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li? L }₂ ( L =2 THF, tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA)) and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ have the typical chiral C_α? S conformation of α‐sulfonyl carbanions, planar C_α atoms, and short C_α? S bonds. Ab initio calculations of [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]^? and [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]^? showed for the fluorinated carbanion stronger n_C→σ* and n_O→σ* interactions and a weaker benzylic stabilization. According to natural bond orbital (NBO) calculations of [R¹C(R²)SO₂R]^? (R=tBu, CF₃) the n_C→σ*_{S? R} interaction is much stronger for R=CF₃. Ab initio calculations gave for [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,C_α contact ion pair (CIP) and for [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,O CIP. According to cryoscopy, [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li, [iHexC(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li, and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ predominantly form monomers in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at ?108 °C. The NMR spectroscopic data of salts [R¹(R²)SO₂R³]Li (R³=tBu, CF₃) indicate that the dominating monomeric CIPs are devoid of C_α? Li bonds.     

Acetalization and Transacetalization Reactions Catalyzed by Ruthenium,Rhodium, and Iridium Complexes with {2‐{{Bis[3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphino}methyl}‐2‐methylpropane‐ 1,3‐diyl}bis[bis[3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphine] (MeC[CH2P(m‐CF3C6H4)2]3)

The complexes [RhCl_(3−n)(MeCN)_n(CF₃triphos)](CF₃SO₃)_n (n=1, 2; CF₃triphos=MeC[CH₂P(m‐CF₃C₆H₄)₂]₃) and [M(MeCN)₃ (CF₃triphos)](CF₃SO₃)_n (M=Ru, n=2; M=Ir, n=3) are catalyst precursors for some typical acetalization and transacetalization reactions. The activity of these complexes is higher than those of the corresponding species containing the parent ligand MeC[CH₂P(C₆H₅)₂]₃(Htriphos). Also the complexes [MCl₃(tripod)] (tripod=Htriphos and CF₃triphos) are active catalysts for the above reactions. The complex [RhCl₂(MeCN)(CF₃triphos)](CF₃SO₃) catalyzes the acetalization of benzophenone.     

Ethylene/α‐olefin copolymerization with bis(β‐enaminoketonato) titanium complexes activated with modified methylaluminoxane

Copolymerizations of ethylene with α‐olefins (i.e., 1‐hexene, 1‐octene, allylbenzene, and 4‐phenyl‐1‐butene) using the bis(β‐enaminoketonato) titanium complexes [(Ph)NC(R₂)CHC(R₁)O]₂TiCl₂ ( 1a : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = CH₃; 1b : R₁ = Ph, R₂ = CF₃; and 1c : R₁ = t‐Bu, R₂ = CF₃), activated with modified methylaluminoxane as a cocatalyst, have been investigated. The catalyst activity, comonomer incorporation, and molecular weight, and molecular weight distribution of the polymers produced can be controlled over a wide range by the variation of the catalyst structure, α‐olefin, and reaction parameters such as the comonomer feed concentration. The substituents R₁ and R₂ of the ligands affect considerably both the catalyst activity and comonomer incorporation. Precatalyst 1a exhibits high catalytic activity and produces high‐molecular‐weight copolymers with high α‐olefin insertion. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6323–6330, 2005     

From C1 to C3: Copper‐Catalyzed gem‐Bis(trifluoromethyl)olefination of α‐Diazo Esters with TMSCF3

A Cu‐catalyzed gem‐bis(trifluoromethyl)olefination of α‐diazo esters, using TMSCF₃ as the only fluorocarbon source, has been developed and provides an exquisite method to access gem‐bis(trifluoromethyl)alkenes. This unprecedented olefination process involves a carbene migratory insertion into “CuCF₃” to generate the α‐CF₃‐substituted organocopper species, which then undergoes β‐fluoride elimination and two consecutive addition‐elimination processes to give the desired products. The key to this efficient one‐pot C₁‐to‐C₃ synthetic protocol lies in the controllable double (over single and triple) trifluoromethylations of the gem‐difluoroalkene intermediates.     

Strukturen von Bis(trifluormethyl)halogeno‐ und ‐thiocyanato‐mercuraten, [Hg(CF3)2X]— (X = Br,I, SCN), und ein Vergleich der Strukturparameter der CF3‐Gruppen

Structures of Bis(trifluoromethyl)halogeno and thiocyanato Mercurates, [Hg(CF₃)₂X]^— (X = Br, I, SCN), and a Comparison of the Structural Parameters of the CF₃ Groups [(18‐C‐6)K]₂[Hg(CF₃)₂SCN]₂ (1) and [P(CH₃)(C₆H₅)₃]₂[Hg(CF₃)₂X]₂ (X = Br (2) , I (3) ) are prepared and their crystal structures are determined. [(18‐C‐6)K]₂[Hg(CF₃)₂SCN]₂ (1) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with Z = 2, [P(CH₃)(C₆H₅)₃]₂[Hg(CF₃)₂Br]₂ (2) in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with Z = 2 and [P(CH₃)(C₆H₅)₃]₂[Hg(CF₃)₂I]₂ (3) in the triclinic space group P1¯ with Z = 1. In the solid state the three compounds form dimeric anions with planar Hg₂X₂ rings. The structural parameters of the Hg(CF₃)₂ units in the till now known bis(trifluoromethyl)halogeno mercurates are compared. In all compounds one nearly symmetric and one distorted CF₃ group exist. The largest differences of the C—F bond lengths is found for [(18‐C‐6)K][Hg(CF₃)₂I]. This can be regarded as the experimental evidence for the properties of trifluoromethyl mercury compounds to act as excellent difluorocarbene sources in the presence of alkali iodides.     

Synthesen und NMR‐Untersuchungen von Salzen mit den neuen Anionen [PtXn(CF3)6‐n]2— (n = 0 ‐ 5, X = F,OH, Cl,CN) und die Kristallstrukturanalyse von K2[(CF3)2F2Pt(μ‐OH)2PtF2(CF3)2]·2H2O

Syntheses and NMR Spectroscopic Ivestigations of Salts containing the Novel Anions [PtX_n(CF₃)_6‐n]^2— (n = 0 ‐ 5, X = F, OH, Cl, CN) and Crystal Structure of K₂[(CF₃)₂F₂Pt(μ‐OH)₂PtF₂(CF₃)₂]·2H₂O The first syntheses of trifluoromethyl‐complexes of platinum through fluorination of cyanoplatinates are reported. The fluorination of tetracyanoplatinates(II), K₂[Pt(CN)₄], and hexacyanoplatinates(IV), K₂[Pt(CN)₆], with ClF in anhydrous HF leads after working up of the products to K₂[(CF₃)₂F₂Pt(μ‐OH)₂PtF₂(CF₃)₂]·2H₂O. The structure of the salt is determined by a X‐ray structure analysis, P2₁/c (Nr. 14), a = 11.391(2), b = 11.565(2), c = 13.391(3)Å, β = 90.32(3)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0326 (I > 2σ(I)). The reaction of [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CN)₄] with ClF in CH₂Cl₂ generates mainly cis‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtCl₂(CF₃)₄] and fac‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtCl₃(CF₃)₃], but in contrast that of [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CN)₆] with ClF in CH₂Cl₂ results cis‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtX₂(CF₃)₄], [Bu₄N]₂[PtX(CF₃)₅] (X = F, Cl) and [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CF₃)₆]. In the products [Bu₄N]₂[PtX_n(CF₃)_6‐n] (X = F, Cl, n = 0—3) it is possibel to exchange the fluoro‐ligands into chloro‐ and cyano‐ligands by treatment with (CH₃)₃SiCl und (CH₃)₃SiCN at 50 °C. With continuing warming the trifluoromethyl‐ligands are exchanged by chloro‐ and cyano‐ligands, while as intermediates CF₂Cl and CF₂CN ligands are formed. The identity of the new trifluoromethyl‐platinates is proved by ¹⁹⁵Pt‐ and ¹⁹F‐NMR‐spectroscopy.     

A Convenient,Selective Synthesis of Bis[2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphane Derivatives Starting from 1,3‐Bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene

The reaction of the sterically shielded phosphane derivative, dichlorodiethylaminophosphane, Cl₂PNEt₂, with an excess of a mixture of 2,6‐bis(trifluoromethyl) and 2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl lithium gives bis[2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]diethylaminophosphane, [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂PNEt₂, in 72 % yield as a colourless solid, while 2,6‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl lithium remains unchanged in solution. The amino derivative crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c (a 869.2(1), b 1857.4(1), c 1357.6(1) pm, β 100.57(4)°, Z = 4). Treatment of [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂PNEt₂ in CHCl₃ solution with conc. HCl allows the synthesis of [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃)]₂PCl. [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂PCl reacts with H₂O in THF solution with quantitative formation of the corresponding secondary phosphane oxide. To obtain bis[2,4‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]phosphinic acid, [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂P(O)OH, quantitatively, a CHCl₃ solution of [2,4‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃]₂P(O)H, has to be stirred in an NO₂ atmosphere. The phosphinic acid crystallizes is the triclinic space group (a 754.2(1), b 927.6(2), c 1305.5(2) pm, α 85.11(2)°, β 75.45(1)°, γ 79.99(2)°, Z = 2). From the reaction of the phosphinic acid with either elemental sodium or with cyanide salts, the corresponding phosphinate salts are obtained in an almost quantitatively yield.     

Zweikernige Palladium(II)‐, Platin(II)‐ und Iridium(III)‐Komplexe von Bis[imidazol‐4‐yl]alkanen

Dinuclear Palladium(II), Platinum(II), and Iridium(III) Complexes of Bis[imidazol‐4‐yl]alkanes The reaction of bis(1,1′‐triphenylmethyl‐imidazol‐4‐yl) alkanes ((CH₂)_n bridged imidazoles L(CH₂)_nL, n = 3–6) with chloro bridged complexes [R₃P(Cl)M(μ‐Cl)M(Cl)PR₃] (M = Pd, Pt; R = Et, Pr, Bu) affords the dinuclear compounds [Cl₂(R₃P)M–L(CH₂)_nL–M(PR₃)Cl₂] 1 – 17 . The structures of [Cl₂(Et₃P)Pd–L(CH₂)₃L–Pd(PEt₃)Cl₂] ( 1 ), [Cl₂(Bu₃P)Pd–L(CH₂)₄L–Pd(PBu₃)Cl₂] ( 10 ), [Cl₂(Et₃P)Pd–L(CH₂)₅L–Pd(PEt₃)Cl₂] ( 3 ), [Cl₂(Et₃P)Pt–L(CH₂)₃L–Pt(PEt₃)Cl₂] ( 13 ) with trans Cl–M–Cl groups were determined by X‐ray diffraction. Similarly the complexes [Cl₂(Cp*)Ir–L(CH₂)_nL–Ir(Cp*)Cl₂] (n = 4–6) are obtained from [Cp*(Cl)Ir(μ‐Cl)₂Ir(Cl)Cp*] and the methylene bridged bis(imidazoles).     

Phosphonium Salts of 1,8‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)naphthalene: Molecular Structures and NMR‐spectroscopic Studies

A representative series of diphosphine monophosphonium salts [1‐Ph₂P(C₁₀H₆)‐8‐PRPh₂]⁺X^– ( 2 b : R = H, X = CF₃SO₃; 4 : R = Me, X = CF₃SO₃; 5 : R = C₆H₅CH₂ = Bn, X = Br) has been prepared by treatment of 1,8‐bis(diphenylphosphino)naphthalene (dppn, 1 ) with stoichiometric amounts of HSO₃CF₃ or CH₃SO₃CF₃ in CH₂Cl₂ at +20 °C and with C₆H₅CH₂Br in toluene at +80 °C. Their X‐ray crystal structures show that there is no evidence for dative P → P⁺ interactions. Instead, steric repulsion deflects the substituent groups to opposite faces of the naphthalene plane [splay angles: +11.4° ( 2 b ), +13.6° ( 4 ); +16.7° ( 5 )]. In solution 2 b , 4 , and 5 were dynamic according to ³¹P, ¹³C, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The fluxionality of 2 b involves rapid intramolecular proton exchange between the two phosphorus atoms, which slows down at low temperature, whereas the dynamic behaviour of 4 and 5 is interpreted in terms of hindered rotation of the bulky RPh₂P⁺ groups (R = Me or Bn) about the P–C(naphthyl) bond. Treatment of 1,8‐bis(diphenylphosphoryl)naphthalene (dppnO₂, 6 ) with HSO₃CF₃ gave the protonated bis(phosphine oxide), as the triflate salt, dppnO₂H⁺ CF₃SO₃^– ( 7 ). The X‐ray structure analysis of 7 revealed a highly strained molecule (P1…P2 365.5 pm) in which the P=O bonds point to the same face of the naphthalene plane to accommodate the proton. All isolated compounds were characterised by a combination of ³¹P, ¹H, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy ( 7 ), mass spectrometry and elemental analysis.     

Syntheses and structures of one CuI‐containing coordination polymer and two macrocyclic supramolecular complexes based on flexible 1,3,4‐oxadiazole‐containing ligands

Three coordination complexes with Cu^I centres have been prepared using the symmetrical flexible organic ligands 1,3‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}propane (L1) and 1,4‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}butane (L2). Crystallization of L1 with Cu(SO₃CF₃)₂ and of L2 with Cu(BF₄)₂ and Cu(ClO₄)₂ in a CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH mixed‐solvent system at room temperature afforded the coordination complexes catena‐poly[[copper(I)‐μ‐1,3‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}propane] methanesulfonate dichloromethane 0.6‐solvate], {[Cu(C₂₅H₁₈N₆O₂S₂)](CF₃SO₃)·0.6CH₂Cl₂}_n, (I), bis(μ‐1,4‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}butane)dicopper(I) bis(tetrafluoridoborate)–dichloromethane–methanol (1/1.5/1), [Cu₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆O₂S₂)₂](BF₄)₂·1.5CH₂Cl₂·CH₃OH, (II), and bis(μ‐1,4‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}butane)dicopper(I) bis(perchlorate)–dichloromethane–methanol (1/2/1), [Cu₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆O₂S₂)₂](ClO₄)₂·2CH₂Cl₂·CH₃OH, (III). Under the control of the dumbbell‐shaped CF₃SO₃⁻ anion, complex (I) forms a one‐dimensional chain and neighbouring chains form a spiral double chain. Under the control of the regular tetrahedron‐shaped BF₄⁻ and ClO₄⁻ anions, complexes (II) and (III) have been obtained as bimetallic rings, which further interact viaπ–π interactions to form two‐dimensional networks. The anions play a decisive role in determining the arrangement of these discrete molecular complexes in the solid state.     

Positional disorder manifested as compositional in a pseudo‐C2‐symmetrical Pd complex

The title compound {2‐[3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐ylmethyl]‐6‐(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐ylmethyl)pyridine}methylpalladium(II) tetrakis[3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate, [Pd(C₁₈H₁₈F₆N₅)][B(C₈H₃F₆)₄], crystallizes as discrete cations and anions. The cation possesses a pseudo‐twofold axis about which positional disorder of the tridentate ligand is exhibited. The four substituents on the two pyrazole rings exhibit CH₃/CF₃ disorder, while all other atoms are ordered. Thus, this disorder can be conveniently described `locally' as compositional, while `globally' for the entire tridentate ligand it is positional. The anion also exhibits typical rotational positional disorder in three of the CF₃ groups. All disordered CF₃ groups were modeled with idealized C_3v geometry.     

Fluoroborates by Cleavage of Trimethylamine‐bis(trifluoromethyl)boranes with NEt3 × 3 HF. Structures of C6F5(CF3)2B · NMe3, K[C6H5CH2(CF3)2BF], and K[C6H5(CF3)2BF]

Trimethylamine‐bis(trifluoromethyl)boranes R(CF₃)₂B · NMe₃ (R = cis/trans‐CF₃CF=CF ( 1/2 ), HC≡C ( 3 ), H₂C=CH ( 4 ), C₂H₅ ( 5 ), C₆H₅CH₂ ( 6 ), C₆F₅ ( 7 ), C₆H₅ ( 8 )) react with NEt₃ × 3 HF depending on the nature of R at 155–200 °C under replacement of the trimethylamine ligand to form the corresponding fluoro‐bis(trifluoromethyl)borates [R(CF₃)₂BF]^– ( 1 a/2 a – 8 a ). The structures of 7 , K[C₆H₅CH₂(CF₃)₂BF] ( K‐6 a ), and K[C₆H₅(CF₃)₂BF] ( K‐8 a ) have been investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In 7 the CF₃ groups make short repulsive contacts with NMe₃ and C₆F₅ entities – the B–CF₃ bonds being unusually long. The B–F bond lengths of K‐6 a and K‐8 a (1.446(3) and 1.452(2) Å, respectively) are long for a fluoroborate.     

Two 2,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazo­le–metal complexes (M = Cu and Ni)

The reaction of the diazine ligand 3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazole (pod, C₁₂H₈N₄O), with Cu(CF₃SO₃)₂ or Ni(ClO₄)₂ afforded the title complexes di­aqua­bis­[3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazole‐N²,N³]copper(II) bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sul­fon­ate), [Cu(pod)₂(H₂O)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂, and di­aqua­bis­[3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazo­le‐N²,N³]­nickel(II) diperchlorate, [Ni(pod)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂. Both complexes present a crystallographically centrosymmetric mononuclear cation structure which consists of a six‐coordinated Cu^II or Ni^II ion with two pod mol­ecules acting as bidentate ligands and two axially coordinated water mol­ecules.     

Difluoromethylation of Amines with Zn(CF3)Br · 2 CH3CN,Cd(CF3)2 · 2 CH3CN and the System Bi(CF3)3/AlCl3

The reactions of Zn(CF₃)Br · 2 CH₃CN, Cd(CF₃)₂ · 2 CH₃CN or Bi(CF₃)₃/AlCl₃ with tertiary amines lead to the formation of quaternary ammonium salts of the general formula [R₃NCF₂H]X. The reaction of 4‐N,N‐dimethylaminopyridine with Zn(CF₃)Br · 2 CH₃CN yields (N‐difluoromethyl)‐4‐N,N‐dimethylaminopyridinium bromide. Bi(CF₃)₃/AlCl₃ reacts with 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane to form a mixture of mono‐ and bis(difluoromethylammonium) salts.     

Oxidative addition of substituted arsines and stibines with bis(trifluoromethyl)nitroxyl

Reactions of bis(trifluoromethyl)nitroxyl with a number of methyl- and trifluoromethyl- substituted arsines and stibines at room temperature lead to the formation of pentavalent arsenic and antimony derivatives, namely (CH₃)_3?n(CF₃)_nM[ON(CF₃)₂]₂ (M = As, n = 0, 1, 2; M = Sb, n = 0, 1). The derivatives yield bis(trifluoromethyl)- hydroxylamine and the corresponding dichlorides on treatment with hydrogen chloride. A free radical mechanism is proposed for the oxidative addition reactions.     

Palladium‐Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Cross‐Coupling of Secondary α‐(Trifluoromethyl)benzyl Tosylates

A palladium‐catalyzed C(sp³)−C(sp²) Suzuki–Miyaura cross‐coupling of aryl boronic acids and α‐(trifluoromethyl)benzyl tosylates is reported. A readily available, air‐stable palladium catalyst was employed to access a wide range of functionalized 1,1‐diaryl‐2,2,2‐trifluoroethanes. Enantioenriched α‐(trifluoromethyl)benzyl tosylates were found to undergo cross‐coupling to give the corresponding enantioenriched cross‐coupled products with an overall inversion in configuration. The crucial role of the CF₃ group in promoting this transformation is demonstrated by comparison with non‐fluorinated derivatives.     

A Design Strategy for Single‐Stranded Helicates using Pyridine‐Hydrazone Ligands and PbII

The reactions of py‐hz ligands ( L1–L5 ) with Pb(CF₃SO₃)₂?H₂O resulted in some rare examples of discrete single‐stranded helical Pb^II complexes. L1 and L2 formed non‐helical mononuclear complexes [Pb L1 (CF₃SO₃)₂]?CHCl₃ and Pb L2 (CF₃SO₃)₂][Pb L2 CF₃SO₃]CF₃SO₃?CH₃CN, which reflected the high coordination number and effective saturation of Pb^II by the ligands. The reaction of L3 with Pb^II resulted in a dinuclear meso‐helicate [Pb₂ L3 (CF₃SO₃)₂Br]CF₃SO₃?CH₃CN with a stereochemically‐active lone pair on Pb^II. L4 directed single‐stranded helicates with Pb^II, including [Pb₂ L4 (CF₃SO₃)₃]CF₃SO₃?CH₃CN and [Pb₂ L4 CF₃SO₃(CH₃OH)₂](CF₃SO₃)₃?2 CH₃OH?2 H₂O. The acryloyl‐modified py‐hz ligand L5 formed helical and non‐helical complexes with Pb^II, including a trinuclear Pb^II complex [Pb₃ L5 (CF₃SO₃)₅]CF₃SO₃?3CH₃CN?Et₂O. The high denticity of the long‐stranded py‐hz ligands L4 and L5 was essential to the formation of single‐stranded helicates with Pb^II.     

Linkage isomeric oxamate chelates: rac‐bis(ethane‐1,2‐diamine)oxamatocobalt(III) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) dihydrate and Λ(+)578‐bis(ethane‐1,2‐diamine)[oxamato(2−)]cobalt(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate

The structures of rac‐bis(ethane‐1,2‐diamine)(oxamato‐κ²O¹,O²)cobalt(III) bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) dihydrate, [Co(C₂H₂NO₃)(C₂H₈N₂)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂·2H₂O, (I), and Λ(+)₅₇₈‐bis(ethane‐1,2‐diamine)[oxamato(2−)‐κ²N,O¹]cobalt(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate, [Co(C₂HNO₃)(C₂H₈N₂)₂]CF₃SO₃, (II), are compared. Together, the two complexes constitute the first pair of linkage isomers of bidentate oxamate available for structural comparison.     

P‐bis(trifluoromethyl) ylides: Synthesis and reactions

Bis(trifluoromethyl)phosphines RP(CF₃)₂ (R = Me, NEt₂) were methylated by MeOSO₂CF₃, yielding the respective phosphonium salts [RP(CF₃)₂Me]⁺ and CF₃SO₃⁻. Deprotonation using MeNP(NEt₂)₃ led to the phosphorus ylides RP(CF₃)₂CH₂, stable in solution at ambient temperature, which could be converted into 1,2λ⁵σ⁵‐oxaphosphetanes by adding hexafluoroacetone. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 13:650–653, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/hc.10061     

Darstellung von Dimethyl-N-Chlorammoniumtrifluormethansulfonat ((CH3)2NClH+ CF3SO3−)

Synthesis of Dimethyl-N-Chloroammonium Trifluoromethane Sulfonate ((CH₃)₂NClH⁺ CF₃SO₃^?) The weak base dimethyl-N-chloroamine, (CH₃)₂NCl, reacts with trifluormethane sulfonic acid at ?40 to ?30°C to give dimethyl-N-chloroammonium trifluoromethane sulfonate (CH₃)₂NClH⁺CF₃SO₃^?. The extremely hygroscopic salt decomposes upon melting at 107 to 108°C and thus is slightly more stable than the hydrogensulfate. Water or methanole liberate dimethyl-N-chloroamine from the salt. The salt is insoluble in ether and decomposes after dissolving in methylene chloride to give dimethylammonium trifluoromethane sulfonate (CH₃)₂NH₂⁺CF₃SO₃^?.