Zur Reaktion von cyclo‐Tristannazanen, [(CH3)2Sn–N(R)]3, mit den Trimethylderivaten des Aluminiums,Galliums und Indiums

The Reactions of cyclo ‐Tristannazanes, [(CH₃)₂Sn–N(R)]₃, with the Trimethyl Derivatives of Aluminium, Gallium, and Indium The cyclo‐tristannazanes [Me₂Sn–N(R)]₃ (with R = Me, ⁿPr, ⁱPr, ⁱBu) have been prepared from Me₂SnCl₂ and LiN(H)R in a 1 : 2 molar ratio. With MMe₃ (M = Al, Ga, In) they form the dimeric dimethylmetal trimethylstannyl(alkyl)amides [Me₂M–N(R)SnMe₃]₂ in good yields. The mass, NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn), and vibrational spectra are discussed and compared with the spectra of the tristannazanes. Thermolysis of the gallium amidocompounds splits SnMe₄ to form methylgallium imido derivatives with cage structures. The crystal structures of selected stannylamido complexes have been determined by X‐ray structure analysis.     

Synthese,NMR‐Spektren und Molekülstruktur von [(CH3)2Ga{μ‐P(H)Si(CH3)3}2Ga(CH3)2{μ‐P(Si(CH3)3)2}Ga(CH3)2]

Synthesis, NMR Spectra and Structure of [(CH₃)₂Ga{μ‐P(H)Si(CH₃)₃}₂Ga(CH₃)₂{μ‐P(Si(CH₃)₃)₂}Ga(CH₃)₂] The title compound has been prepared in good yield by the reaction of [Me₂GaOMe]₃ (Me = CH₃) with HP(SiMe₃)₂ in toluene (ratio 1 : 1,1) and purified by crystallization from pentane or toluene, respectively. This organogallium compound forms (Ga–P)₃ ring skeletons with one Ga–P(SiMe₃)₂–Ga and two Ga–P(H)SiMe₃–Ga bridges and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c. The known homologous Al‐compound is isotypic, both (M^III–P)₃ heterocycles have twist‐conformations, the ligands of the monophosphane bridges have trans arrangements.     

Über Bildung und Reaktionen der CH2Li‐Derivate von tBu2P–P=P(CH3)tBu2 und (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(CH3)tBu2

Formation and Reactions of the CH₂Li‐Derivatives of ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ and (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ With ⁿBuLi, (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 2 ) yield (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₂Li)^tBu₂ ( 3 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₂Li)^tBu₂ ( 4 ), wich react with Me₃SiCl to give (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₂–SiMe₃)^tBu₂ ( 5 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₂–SiMe₃)^tBu₂ ( 6 ), respectively. With ^tBu₂P–P(SiMe₃)–P^tBuCl ( 7 ), compound 3 forms 5 as well as the cyclic products [H₂C–P(^tBu)₂=P–P(^tBu)–P^tBu] ( 8 ) and [H₂C–P(^tBu)₂=P–P(P^tBu₂)–P(^tBu)] ( 9 ). Also 3 forms 8 with ^tBuPCl₂. The cleavage of the Me₃Si–P‐bond in 1 by means of C₂Cl₆ or N‐bromo‐succinimide yields (Cl)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 10 ) or (Br)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 11 ), resp. With LiP(SiMe₃)₂, 10 forms (Me₃Si)₂P–P(^tBu)–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 12 ), and Et₂P–P(^tBu)–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 13 ) with LiPEt₂. All compounds are characterized by ³¹P NMR Data and mass spectra; the ylide 5 and the THF adduct of 4 additionally by X‐ray structure analyses.     

8‐Amidoquinoline, 8‐(Trialkylsilylamido)quinoline, 2‐Pyridylmethylamide,and (2‐Pyridylmethyl)(trialkylsilyl)amide Complexes of Gallium

Lithium 8‐amidoquinoline ( 1 ) and lithium 8‐(trialkylsilylamido)quinoline [SiMe₂tBu ( 2 ), SiiPr₃ ( 3 )] react with dimethylgallium chloride to the metathesis products dimethylgallium 8‐amidoquinoline ( 4 ) as well as dimethylgallium 8‐(trialkylsilylamido)quinoline [SiMe₂tBu ( 5 ), SiiPr₃ ( 6 )]. The gallium atoms are in distorted tetrahedral environments. During the synthesis of 5 , orange dimethylgallium 2‐butyl‐8‐(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)quinoline ( 7 ) was found as by‐product. The metathesis reactions of Me₂GaCl with LiN(R)CH₂Py (Py = 2‐pyridyl) yield the corresponding 2‐pyridylmethylamides Me₂Ga‐N(H)CH₂Py ( 8 ), Me₂Ga‐N(SiMe₂tBu)CH₂Py ( 9 ) and Me₂Ga‐N(SiiPr₃)CH₂Py ( 10 ). In these complexes the gallium atoms show a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere. However, derivative 8 crystallizes dimeric with bridging amido units whereas in 9 and 10 the 2‐pyridylmethylamido moieties act as bidentate ligands leading to monomeric molecules.     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Yttrium Siloxide Complexes Bearing Terminal Methyl Ligands: Molecular Models for Ln−CH3 Terminated Silica Surfaces

Surface organometallic chemistry (SOMC) on silica materials is a prominent approach for the generation of highly active heterogenized polymerization catalysts. Despite advanced methods of characterization, the elucidation of the catalytically active surface species remains a challenging task. Alkylated rare‐earth metal siloxide complexes can be regarded as molecular models of respective covalently bonded alkylated surface species, primarily used for 1,3‐diene polymerization. Here, we performed both salt metathesis reactions of [Y(MMe₄)₃] (M = Al, Ga) with [K{OSi(OtBu)₃}] and alkylation reactions of [Y{OSi(OtBu)₃}₃]₂ with AlMe₃. The obtained complexes [Y(CH₃)[(AlMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂](AlMe₄)]₂, [Y(CH₃)[(AlMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂]‐{OSi(OtBu)₃}], [Y{OSi(OtBu)₃}₃(μ‐Me)Y(μ‐Me)₂Y{OSi(OtBu)₃}₂(AlMe₄)], and [Y(CH₃)(GaMe₄){OSi(OtBu)₃}]₂ represent rare examples of organoyttrium species with terminal methyl groups. The formation and purity of the mixed methyl/siloxy yttrium complexes could be enhanced by treating [Y(MMe₄)₃] with [K(MMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂]_n (M=Al: n=2; M=Ga: n=∞). Complexes [K(MMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂]_n were obtained by addition of [K{OSi(OtBu)₃}] to [Me₂M{OSi(OtBu)₃}]₂. Deeper insight into the fluxional behavior of the mixed methyl/siloxy yttrium complexes in solution was gained by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic studies at variable temperature and ¹H–⁸⁹Y HSQC NMR spectroscopy.     

Functionalization of [Ge9] with Small Silanes:[Ge9(SiR3)3]– (R = iBu,iPr, Et) and the Structures of (CuNHCDipp)[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}3], (K‐18c6)Au[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}3]2, and (K‐18c6)2[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}2]

Novel silylation reactions at [Ge₉] Zintl clusters starting from the chlorosilanes SiR₃Cl (R = iBu, iPr, Et) and the Zintl phase K₄Ge₉ are reported. The formation of the tris‐silylated anions [Ge₉(SiR₃)₃]^– [R = iBu ( 1a ), iPr ( 1b ), Et ( 1c )] by heterogeneous reactions in acetonitrile was monitored by ESI‐MS measurements. For R = iBu ¹H, ¹³C and ²⁹Si NMR experiments confirmed the exclusive formation of 1a . Subsequent reactions of 1a with CuNHC^DippCl and Au(PPh₃)Cl result in formation of the neutral metal complex (CuNHC^Dipp)[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]·0.5 tol ( 2 ·0.5 tol) and the metal bridged dimeric unit {Au[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]₂}^– ( 3a ), isolated as a (K‐18c6)⁺ salt in (K‐18c6)Au[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]₂·tol ( 3 ·tol), respectively. Finally, from a toluene/hexane solution of 1a in presence of 18‐crown‐6, crystals of the compound (K‐18c6)₂[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₂]·tol ( 4 ·tol), containing the bis‐silylated cluster anion [Ge₉(Si(iBu)₃)₂]^2– ( 4a ), were obtained. The compounds 2 ·0.5 tol, 3 ·tol and 4 ·tol were characterized by single‐crystal structure determination.     

Ligandverhalten von P‐funktionellen Organozinnhalogeniden: Nickel(II)‐, Palladium(II)‐ und Platin(II)‐halogenid‐Komplexe mit Me2(Cl)SnCH2CH2PPh2

Ligand Behaviour of P‐functional Organotin Halides: Nickel(II), Palladium(II), and Platinum(II) Complexes with Me₂(Cl)SnCH₂CH₂PPh₂ Me₂(Cl)SnCH₂CH₂PPh₂ ( 1 ) reacts with Ni^II, Pd^II, and Pt^II halides in molar ratio 2 : 1 forming the complexes [MX₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] (M = Ni, Pd, Pt; X = Cl, Br) ( 3 – 6 , 9 , 10 ) ( 7 , 8 : M = Ni; Br instead of Cl). The nickel complexes were isolated and characterized both as the planar ( 3 , 5 , 7 ) and the tetrahedral ( 4 , 6 , 8 ) isomer. Crystal structure analyses and NMR data indicate for the planar nickel complexes 3 , 5 , 7 and [MCl₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] ( 9 : M = Pd; 10 : M = Pt) the existence of intra and intermolecular M–Hal…Sn bridges. In a ligand : metal molar ratio of 3 : 1 the complexes [M^éCl{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn^⊖Cl₂Me₂}{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] ( 11 : M = Pd; 12 : M = Pt) are formed which represent intramolecular ion pairs. By dehalogenation of [PdCl₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}₂] ( 9 ) with sodium amalgam and graphite potassium (C₈K), respectively, the palladacycles cis‐[Pd{PPh₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂}₂] ( 13 ) and trans‐[Pd(Cl)PPh₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂{PPh₂CH₂CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂}] ( 14 ) are formed. From the compounds 1 , 3 , 9 , 11 , and 12 the crystal structures are determined. All compounds are characterized by ¹H, ³¹P, and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy.     

Iodostannate mit polymeren Anionen: (Me3PhN)4 [Sn3I10], [Me2HN–(CH2)2–NMe2H]2 [Sn3I10] und [Me2HN–(CH2)2–NMe2H][Sn3I8]

Iodostannates with Polymeric Anions: (Me₃PhN)₄ [Sn₃I₁₀], [Me₂HN–(CH₂)₂–NMe₂H]₂ [Sn₃I₁₀], and [Me₂HN–(CH₂)₂–NMe₂H] [Sn₃I₈] The polymeric iodostannate anions in (Me₃PhN)₄ [Sn₃I₁₀] ( 1 ) and [Me₂HN–(CH₂)₂–NMe₂H]₂ [Sn₃I₁₀] ( 2 ) consist of Sn₃I₁₂‐trioctahedra, which share four common iodine atoms with adjacent units to form infinite layers in 1 and polymeric chains in 2 . In the anion of [Me₂HN–(CH₂)₂–NMe₂H] [Sn₃I₈] ( 3 ) distorted SnI₆ octahedra sharing common edges and vertices form a two‐dimensional network. (Me₃PhN)₄ [Sn₃I₁₀] ( 1 ): Space group C2/c (No. 15), a = 2406.9(2), b = 968.26(7), c = 2651.7(2) pm, β = 111.775(9), V = 5738.9(8) · 10⁶ pm³; [Me₂HN–(CH₂)₂–NMe₂H]₂ [Sn₃I₁₀] ( 2 ): Space group P2₁/n (No. 14), a = 1187.2(1), b = 1554.4(1), c = 1188.9(1) pm, β = 116.620(8), V = 1961.4(3) · 10⁶ pm³; [Me₂HN–(CH₂)₂–NMe₂H] [Sn₃I₈] ( 3 ): Space group P2₁/c (No. 14), a = 1098.9(2), b = 803.93(7), c = 1571.5(2) pm, β = 102.96(1), V = 1352.9(2) · 10⁶ pm³.     

Zur Struktur und Reaktivität von stannylierten Propylaminen und -sulfiden. Kristall- und Molekülstruktur von Bis(3-dimethylchlorostannylpropyl)sulfid S(CH2CH2CH2SnMe2Cl)2

Structure and Reactivity of Stannylated Propyl Amines and Propyl Sulfides. Crystal and Molecular Structure of Bis(3-chlorodimethylstannylpropyl)sulfide S(CH₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂Cl)₂ The synthesis and reactivity of stannylated propyl amines and propyl sulfides, respectively, E(CH₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₃)₂ ( 1 , E ? NMe; 2 E ? S) and N(CH₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₃)₃ 3 are reported. 1 and 3 react with dimethyl dichlorostannane under thermal cyclisation to 1,5-dimethyl-5-chloro-1aza-5-stannabicyclo[3.3.0^1,5]octane Me(Cl)Sn(CH₂CH₂CH₂)₂NMe 4 and 5-chloro-1-aza-5-stannatricyclo[3.3.3.0^1,5]-undecane ClSn(CH₂CH₂CH₂)₃N 5 , respectively. The reaction of 2 with dimethyl dichlorostannane leads to the formation of bis(3-chloro-dimethylstannylpropyl)sulfide S(CH₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂Cl)₂ 6 , whereas the treatment of 2 with tin tetrachloride yields the bis(3-di-chloro-methylstannylpropyl)sulfide S(CH₂CH₂CH₂SnMeCl₂)₂ 7 . The ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR data are discussed. 6 crystallizes in the ortho-rhombic space group Pna2₁ with the unit cell parameters a = 2275.0(1), b = 733.6(2), c = 1062.0(4) pm, V = 1.77273 nm³, Z = 4. The structure was refined to a final R value of 0.041. Both tin atoms adopt distorted trigonal bipyramidal configurations as a result of intramolecular interactions with the bridging sulphur. The sulphur and the chlorine atoms occupy the apical positions. The Sn? S distances amount to 309.7(4) and 311.8(4) pm.     

Neue amido‐ und imidoverbrückte Kupferkomplexe – Synthesen und Strukturen von [{Li(OEt2)}2][Cu(NPh2)3], [ClCuN(SnMe3)3], [{CuN(SnMe3)2}4], [Cu16(NH2tBu)12Cl16], [{CuNHtBu}8], [Li(dme)3][Cu6(NHMes)3(NMes)2], [PPh3(C6H4)CuNHMes], [{[Li(dme)][Cu(NHMes)(NHPh)]}2] und [{Li(dme)3}3][Li(dme)2][Cu12(NPh)8]

New Amido and Imido Bridged Complexes of Copper – Syntheses and Structures of [{Li(OEt₂)}₂][Cu(NPh₂)₃], [ClCuN(SnMe₃)₃], [{CuN(SnMe₃)₂}₄], [Cu₁₆(NH₂^tBu)₁₂Cl₁₆], [{CuNH^tBu}₈], [Li(dme)₃][Cu₆(NHMes)₃(NMes)₂], [PPh₃(C₆H₄)CuNHMes], [{[Li(dme)][Cu(NHMes)(NHPh)]}₂], and [{Li(dme)₃}₃][Li(dme)₂][Cu₁₂(NPh)₈] The reactions of stannylated and lithiated amines with coppersalts (halogenides, thiocyanates) lead to amido and imido bridged complexes which contain one to twelve metal atoms. [{Li(OEt₂)}₂][Cu(NPh₂)₃] ( 1 ) results from the reaction of CuCl with LiNPh₂ in the presence of trimethylphosphine. With N(SnMe₃)₃, CuCl reacts to the donor‐acceptor complex [ClCuN(SnMe₃)₃] ( 2 ) that is transformed into the tetrameric complex [{CuN(SnMe₃)₂}₄] ( 3 ) by thermolysis. 3 can also be obtained by the reaction of LiN(SnMe₃)₂ with Cu(SCN)₂. While terminally bound in 1 , the amido ligand is μ₂‐bridging between copper atoms in compound 3 . The influence of the alkyl amide's leaving group can be seen from a comparison of the reactivity of Me₃SnNH^tBu and LiNH^tBu, respectively. With Me₃SnNH^tBu, CuCl₂ forms the polymeric compound [Cu₁₆(NH₂^tBu)₁₂Cl₁₆] ( 4 ) whereas in the case of LiNH^tBu with both CuCl and CuSCN, the complex [{CuNH^tBu}₈] ( 5 ) is obtained. The latter contains two planar Cu₄N₄‐rings similar to those in 3 . If a mesityl group is introduced at the lithium amide, different products are accessible. Both, CuBr and CuSCN, lead to the formation of [Li(dme)₃][Cu₆(NHMes)₃(NMes)₂] ( 6 ) whose anion consists of a prismatic copper core with μ₂‐bridging amido and μ₃‐bridging imido ligands. In the presence of PPh₄Cl, a mixture of Cu(SCN)₂ and LiNHMes enables an ortho‐metallation reaction that produces [PPh₃(C₆H₄)CuNHMes] ( 7 ). From the reaction of CuSCN with LiNHMes and LiNHPh either the dimeric complex [{[Li(dme)][Cu(NHMes)(NHPh)]}₂] ( 8 ) or the cluster [{Li(dme)₃}₃][Li(dme)₂][Cu₁₂(NPh)₈] ( 9 ) results. The anion in 9 exhibits a cubo‐octahedron of copper atoms μ₃‐bridged by (NPh)^2–‐ligands. The solid state structures of compounds 1 – 9 have been determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

From Dibismuthenes to Three‐ and Two‐Coordinated Bismuthinidenes by Fine Ligand Tuning: Evidence for Aromatic BiC3N Rings through a Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study

The reduction of N,C,N‐chelated bismuth chlorides [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH?NR)₂]BiCl₂ [where R=tBu ( 1 ), 2′,6′‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 2 ), or 4′‐Me₂NC₆H₄ ( 3 )] or N,C‐chelated analogues [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH?N‐2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]BiCl₂ ( 4 ) and [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH₂NEt₂)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]BiCl₂ ( 5 ) is reported. Reduction of compounds 1 – 3 gave monomeric N,C,N‐chelated bismuthinidenes [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH?NR)₂]Bi [where R=tBu ( 6 ), 2′,6′‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 7 ) or 4′‐Me₂NC₆H₄ ( 8 )]. Similarly, the reduction of 4 led to the isolation of the compound [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH?N‐2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]Bi ( 9 ) as an unprecedented two‐coordinated bismuthinidene that has been structurally characterized. In contrast, the dibismuthene {[C₆H₂‐2‐(CH₂NEt₂)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]Bi}₂ ( 10 ) was obtained by the reduction of 5 . Compounds 6 – 10 were characterized by using ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and their structures, except for 7 , were determined with the help of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. It is clear that the structure of the reduced products (bismuthinidene versus dibismuthene) is ligand‐dependent and particularly influenced by the strength of the N→Bi intramolecular interaction(s). Therefore, a theoretical survey describing the bonding situation in the studied compounds and related bismuth(I) systems is included. Importantly, we found that the C₃NBi chelating ring in the two‐coordinated bismuthinidene 9 exhibits significant aromatic character by delocalization of the bismuth lone pair.     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

[Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g3‐tBu2PPCH–CH3)] aus [Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g2‐C2H4)2] und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVII [1] [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] from [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g²‐C₂H₄)₂] and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] 1 is formed in the reaction of [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η²‐C₂H₄)₂] 2 with ^tBu₂P–P 4 (generated from ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 ) by elimination of one C₂H₄ ligand and coupling of the phosphinophosphinidene with the second one. The structure of 1 is proven by ³¹P, ¹³C, ¹H NMR spectra and the X‐ray structure analysis. Within the ligand ^tBu₂P¹P²C¹H–CH₃ in 1 , the angle P1–P2–C1 amounts to 90°. The Co, P1, P2, C1 atoms in 1 look like a „butterfly”︁. The reaction of 2 with a mixture of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 and ^tBu–C?P 5 yields [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅){η⁴‐(^tBuCP)₂}] 6 and 1 . While 6 is spontaneously formed, 1 appears only after complete consumption of 5 .     

MAO‐free polymerization of propylene by rac‐ Me2Si(1‐C5H2‐2‐Me‐4‐tBu)2Zr(NMe2)2 compound

Ansa‐zirconocene diamide complex rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂Zr(NMe₂)₂ (rac‐1, CMB = 1‐C₅H₂‐2‐Me‐4‐^tBu) reacts with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et, i‐Bu) and then with [CPh₃]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]⁻ (2) in toluene in order to in situ generate cationic alkylzirconium species. In the sequential NMR‐scale reactions of rac‐1 with various amount of AlMe₃ and 2, rac‐1 transforms first to rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂Zr(Me)(NMe₂) (rac‐3) and rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂ZrMe₂ (rac‐4) by the reaction with AlMe₃, and then to [rac‐Me₂Si(CMB)₂ZrMe]⁺ (5⁺) cation by the reaction of the resulting mixtures with 2. The activities of propylene polymerizations by rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 system are dependent on the type and concentration of AlR₃, resulting in the order of activity: rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 > rac‐1/AlEt₃/2 > rac‐1/MAO ≫ rac‐1/AlMe₃/2 system. The bulkier isobutyl substituents make inactive catalytic species sterically unfavorable and give rise to more separated ion pairs so that the monomers can easily access to the active sites. The dependence of the maximum rate (R_{p, max}) on polymerization temperature (T_p) obtained by rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 system follows Arrhenius relation, and the overall activation energy corresponds to 0.34 kcal/mol. The molecular weight (MW) of the resulting isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is not sensitive to Al(i‐Bu)₃ concentration. The analysis of regiochemical errors of iPP shows that the chain transfer to Al(i‐Bu)₃ is a minor chain termination. The 1,3‐addition of propylene monomer is the main source of regiochemical sequence and the [mr] sequence is negligible, as a result the meso pentad ([mmmm]) values of iPPs are very high ([mmmm] > 94%). These results can explain the fact that rac‐1/Al(i‐Bu)₃/2 system keeps high activity over a wide range of [Al(i‐Bu)₃]/[Zr] ratio between 32 and 3,260. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 1071–1082, 1999     

[Mo2(O2C–CH3)4 · 1/2 {(CH2)6N4} · 1/2 CH2Cl2] – ein Donor‐Akzeptor‐Komplex mit supramolekularer Struktur

[Mo₂(O₂C–CH₃)₄ · ¹/₂ {(CH₂)₆N₄} · ¹/₂ CH₂Cl₂] – a Donor‐Acceptor Complex with Supramolecular Structure Yellow single crystals of [Mo₂(O₂C–CH₃)₄ · ¹/₂ {(CH₂)₆N₄} · ¹/₂ CH₂Cl₂] ( 1 ) have been obtained by the reaction of the silylated phosphaneimine Me₃SiNPEt₃ with [Mo₂(O₂C–CH₃)₄] in dichloromethane solution. 1 forms a three‐dimensional network with linear N–Mo:Mo–N and tetrahedral (CH₂)₆N₄Mo₄ moieties, which is topologically related with the PtS type. Space group P4₂/nnm, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –70 °C: a = b = 1121.7(1), c = 1395.0(3) pm, R₁ = 0.0413.     

Structure and formation of gaseous [C4H6O]+˙ ions: 1—The enolic ions [CH2C(OH)?CHCH2]+˙ and [CH2CH?CHCH(OH)]+˙ and their relationship with their keto counterparts

The [C₄H₆O]^+˙ ion of structure [CH₂?CHCH?CHOH]^+˙ (a) is generated by loss of C₄H₈ from ionized 6,6-dimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ol. The heat of formation ΔH_f of [CH₂?CHCH?CHOH]^+˙ was estimated to be 736 kJ mol^?1. The isomeric ion [CH₂?C(OH)CH?CH₂]^+˙ (b) was shown to have ΔH_f, ? 761 kJ mol^?1, 54 kJ mol^?1 less than that of its keto analogue [CH₃COCH?CH₂]^+˙. Ion [CH₂?C(OH)CH?CH₂]^+˙ may be generated by loss of C₂H₄ from ionized hex-1-en-3-one or by loss of C₄H₈ from ionized 4,4-dimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ol. The [C₄H₆O]^+˙ ion generated by loss of C₂H₄ from ionized 2-cyclohexen-1-ol was shown to consist of a mixture of the above enol ions by comparing the metastable ion and collisional activation mass spectra of [CH₂?CHCH?CHOH]^+˙ and [CH₂?C(OH)CH?CH₂]^+˙ ions with that of the above daughter ion. It is further concluded that prior to their major fragmentations by loss of CH₃˙ and CO, [CH₂?CHCH?CHOH]⁺˙ and [CH₂?C(OH)CH?CH₂]^+˙ do not rearrange to their keto counterparts. The metastable ion and collisional activation characteristics of the isomeric allenic [C₄H₆O]^+˙ ion [CH₂?C?CHCH₂OH]^+˙ are also reported.     

Bis(pyrazolylethyl)thioether ligation to zinc and cadmium: structural characterization of [S(CH2CH2pzMe2)2]ZnCl2, [S(CH2CH2pzMe2)2]CdI2 and [S(CH2CH2pzMe2)2]Cd(NO3)2

Structural characterization of [S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂]ZnCl₂ by X-ray diffraction demonstrates that the potentially tridentate [NNS] donor ligand S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂ does not coordinate via sulfur, but only binds through the pyrazolyl groups. Furthermore, the ligand does not chelate, but preferentially bridges two zinc centers, thereby resulting in a polymeric, helical, structure. In contrast to the zinc system, the thioether functionality does bind to cadmium in related derivatives, [S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂]CdI₂ and [S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂]Cd(NO₃)₂.     

Die Kristallstruktur von tert-Butylimidomethylindan, [CH3In?NC(CH3)3]4

The X-Ray Structure Determination of tert-Butylimido Methylindane, [CH₃In? NC(CH₃)₃]₄ The reaction of MeInCl₂ with LiN(H)^tBu in a 1 : 2 molar ratio forms [MeIn? N^tBu]₄ in high yield, lithium chloride, and the free amine H₂N^tBu. The crystal structure of the imidomethylindane with a cubic In₄N₄ skeleton has been determined.     

Die Reaktion des [(Me3Si)2CH]2Al?CH2?Al [CH(SiMe3)2]2 mit Neopentyllithium: Bildung des {[(Me3Si)2CH]2Al?CH2?Al [CH(SiMe3)2]2CH2CMe3}⊖ [Li(TMEDA)2]⊕

Reaction of [(Me₃Si)₂CH]₂Al? CH₂? Al [CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with Neopentyllithium: Formation of {[(Me₃Si)₂CH]₂Al? CH₂? Al [CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂CH₂CMe₃} ? [Li(TMEDA)₂]⊕ The recently synthesized methylene bridged dialuminium compound [(Me₃Si)₂CH]₂Al? CH₂? Al [CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ reacts with neopentyl lithium in the presence of TMEDA to give the stable {[(Me₃Si)₂CH]₂Al? CH₂? Al [CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂CH₂ · CMe₃}? [Li(TMEDA)₂]⊕ decomposing at 115°C. The aluminium atoms therein are not additionally bridged, but the new substituent is occupying a terminal position as detected by crystal structure determination. A compound is formed containing a saturated, fourfold coordinated neighbouring a formally unsaturated, threefold coordinated aluminium atom. Due to high sterical restrictions the Al? C bonds are lengthened up to 209.0(3) pm at the alanate site and the Al? C? Al angle in the methylene bridge is extraordinarily enlarged to 144.4(2)°.