Reactions of [Ru(CO)3Cl2]2 with aromatic nitrogen donor ligands in alcoholic media

The reactions of mono‐ and bidentate aromatic nitrogen‐containing ligands with [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ in alcohols have been studied. In alcoholic media the nitrogen ligands act as bases promoting acidic behaviour of alcohols and the formation of alkoxy carbonyls [Ru(N–N)(CO)₂Cl(COOR)] and [Ru(N)₂(CO)₂Cl(COOR)]. Other products are monomers of type [Ru(N)(CO)₃Cl₂], bridged complexes such as [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂(N), and ion pairs of the type [Ru(CO)₃Cl₃]^? [Ru(N–N)(CO)₃Cl]⁺ (N–N = chelating aromatic nitrogen ligand, N = non‐chelating or bridging ligand). The reaction and the product distribution can be controlled by adjusting the reaction stoichiometry. The reactivity of the new ruthenium complexes was tested in 1‐hexene hydroformylation. The activity can be associated with the degree of stability of the complexes and the ruthenium–ligand interaction. Chelating or bridging nitrogen ligands suppresses the activity strongly compared with the bare ruthenium carbonyl chloride, while the decrease in activity is less pronounced with monodentate ligands. A plausible catalytic cycle is proposed and discussed in terms of ligand–ruthenium interactions. The reactivity of the ligands as well as the catalytic cycle was studied in detail using the computational DFT methods. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Reactions of trans-[RuCl2(CO)2(PEt3)2] with 1,1-dithiolates: Stepwise formation of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt3)(S2X)] (X = CNMe2, CNEt2, COEt,P(OEt)2, PPh2)

Trans-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PEt₃)₂] reacts with two equivalents of a series of 1,1-dithiolate ligands to form the bis(dithiolate) complexes, cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = CNMe₂, CNEt₂, COEt, P(OEt)₂, PPh₂). Two intermediates have been isolated; trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}] and trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)], allowing a simple reaction scheme to be postulated involving three steps; (i) initial replacement of cis carbonyl and chloride ligands, (ii) substitution of the second chloride, (iii) loss of a phosphine. Thermolysis of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂CNMe₂)₂] with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in xylene affords trinuclear [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] as a result of dithiocarbamate degradation. Crystal structures of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = NMe₂, COEt), trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}], trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)] and [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] are reported.     

Addition von kationischen Lewis‐Säuren [M′Ln]+ (M′Ln = Fe(CO)2Cp,Fe(CO)(PPh3)Cp,Ru(PPh3)2Cp,Re(CO)5, ${1 \over 2}$ Pt(PPh3)2, W(CO)3Cp an die anionischen Thiocarbonyl‐Komplexe [HB(pz)3(OC)2M(CS)]− (M = Mo,W; pz = 3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl)

Addition of Cationic Lewis Acids [M′L_n]⁺ (M′L_n = Fe(CO)₂Cp, Fe(CO)(PPh₃)Cp, Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp, Re(CO)₅, Pt(PPh₃)₂, W(CO)₃Cp to the Anionic Thiocarbonyl Complexes [HB(pz)₃(OC)₂M(CS)]⁻ (M = Mo, W; pz = 3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl) Adducts from Organometallic Lewis Acids [Fe(CO)₂Cp]⁺, [Fe(CO)(PPh₃)Cp]⁺, [Ru(PPh₃)₂Cp]⁺, [Re(CO)₅]⁺, [ Pt(PPh₃)₂]⁺, [W(CO)₃Cp]⁺ and the anionic thiocarbonyl complexes [HB(pz)₃(OC)₂M(CS)]⁻ (M = Mo, W) have been prepared. Their spectroscopic data indicate that the addition of the cations occurs at the sulphur atom to give end‐to‐end thiocarbonyl bridged complexes [HB(pz)₃(OC)₂MCSM′L_n].     

Polymere Thiolatokomplexe [M(SPh)3]∞ der Metalle Molybdän,Wolfram, Eisen und Ruthenium mit linearen Metallketten. Synthese und Struktur von (OC)3Fe(SPh)3Fe(SPh)3Fe(CO)3 · 2(CH3)2CO

Polymeric Thiolato Complexes [M(SPh)₃]∞ of the Metals Mo, W, Fe, and Ru with Linear Metal Chains. Synthesis and Crystal Structure of (OC)₃Fe(SPh)₃Fe(SPh)₃Fe(CO)₃ · 2(CH₃)₂CO At high temperature the reaction of the metal carbonyls Mo(CO)₆, W(CO)₆ and Fe(CO)₅ with S₂Ph₂ (Ph = C₆H₅) yields the polymeric complexes [M(SPh)₃]∞. Similarly [Ru(SPh)₃]∞ can be obtained from ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate and HSPh. At room temperature under UV-irradiation Fe(CO)₅ reacts with S₂Ph₂ to form the oligomeric complex (OC)₃Fe(SPh)₃Fe(SPh)₃Fe(CO)₃. The polymeric complexes [M(SPh)₃]∞ (M = Mo, W, Fe, Ru) are composed of linear chains with bridging SPh-ligands between the metal atoms. Of these complexes [Fe(SPh)₃]∞ is paramagnetic, whereas the others exhibit antiferromagnetic behaviour. The spin coupling is presumably connected with the formation of metal pairs, resulting in alternating shortened and extended distances in the metal chain. The oligomeric complex (OC)₃Fe(SPh)₃Fe(SPh)₃Fe(CO)₃ crystallizes triclinic in the space group P1 with z = 2. It has almost the symmetry D_3d with a linear arrangement of the Fe atoms. The paramagnetism of Fe₃(CO)₆(SPh)₆ can be explained by a d⁶ high spin configuration of the central atom and low spin behaviour of the two other Fe atoms, which are bonded to CO.     

Übergangsmetallkomplexe mit Schwefelliganden. XLIV. Ruthenium(II)-Komplexe mit dem sterisch anspruchsvollen Thioether-Thiolat-Liganden ‚buS4’︁2− (= 1,2-Bis(3,5-di(tertiärbutyl)-2-mercaptophenylthio)-ethan (2-)) sowie den Koliganden PPh3, PMe3, CO,NH3 und N2H4

Transition Metal Complexes with Sulfur Ligands. XLIV. Ruthenium(II) Complexes with the Sterically Demanding Thioether-thiolate Ligand ?^buS₄’?^2?(= 1,2-Bis(3,5-di(tertiarybutyl)-2-mercaptophenylthio) ethane (2-)) and PPh₃, CO, PMe₃, NH₃, and N₂H₄ Coligands The coordination properties of the sterically demanding thioether-thiolate ligand ‘^buS₄’^2? (= 1,2-Bis(3,5-di(tertiarybutyl)-2-mercaptophenylthio)ethane (2-)) towards Ruthenium were investigated. [Ru(PPh₃)₂ (‘^buS₄’)], 1 , was obtained from [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] and ‘^buS₄’? Li₂. One PPh₃ ligand in 1 is labile towards substitution and can be exchanged by L ? CO ( 2 ), PMe₃ ( 3 ), or NH₃ ( 5 ) yielding [Ru(L)(PPh₃)(‘^buS₄’)]. The PMe₃ complex [Ru(PMe₃)₂(‘^buS₄’)], 4 , is thermically inert as well as 2, 3 , and [Ru(CO)₂(‘^buS₄’)], 6 , which was obtained from [RuCl₂(CO)₃THF] and ‘^buS₄’? Li₂. Considering the thermical reaction inertness of 6 , its fast reaction with N₂H₄ yielding [Ru(N₂H₄) (CO) (‘^buS₄’)], 7 , is remarkable; the reaction probably takes place via 19e- intermediates. All ‘^buS₄’ complexes are better soluble in organic solvents than the corresponding [Ru(‘S₄’)] parent compounds, their ν(CO)frequencies or ³¹PNMR shifts, however, are nearly identical, allowing the conclusion that the influence of the t-butyl groups is topological and not electronic. All now complexes were characterized by elemental analyses as well as IR, NMR, and mass spectroscopy.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and X‐ray Structures of Ru3(CO)9(dotpm)(L) Complexes [L = PPh3, P(C6H4Cl‐p)3, and PPh2(C6H4Br‐p)]

The reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₀(dotpm) ( 1 ) [dotpm = (bis(di‐ortho‐tolylphosphanyl)methane)] and one equivalent of L [L = PPh₃, P(C₆H₄Cl‐p)₃ and PPh₂(C₆H₄Br‐p)] in refluxing n‐hexane afforded a series of derivatives [Ru₃(CO)₉(dotpm)L] ( 2 – 4 ), respectively, in ca. 67–70 % yield. Complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by elemental analysis (CHN), IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The molecular structures of 2 , 3 , and 4 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The bidentate dotpm and monodentate phosphine ligands occupy equatorial positions with respect to the Ru triangle. The effect of substitution resulted in significant differences in the Ru–Ru and Ru–P bond lengths.     

Homo- und Hetero-Zweikernkomplexe des D2h-symmetrischen Bis(chelat)-Liganden 2,2′-Bipyrimidin mit den elektronenreichen Metallfragmenten Mo(CO)4, Re(CO)3Cl, [Cu(PPh3)2]+ und [Ru(bpy)2]2+

Homo- and Heterodinuclear Complexes of the D_2h-symmetric Bis(chelate) Ligand 2,2′-Bipyrimidine with Electron-Rich Metal Fragments Mo(CO)₄, Re(CO)₃Cl, [Cu(PPh₃)₂]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂]²⁺ All homo- and heterodinuclear complexes (L_nM)(μ-bpym)(ML_n)′, bpym = 2,2′-bipyrimidine, ML_n (ML_n)′ = Mo(CO)₄, Re(CO)₃Cl, [Cu(PPh₃)₂]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂]²⁺, have been synthesized and studied by cyclic voltammetry, absorption spectroscopy, and by electron spin resonance of singly reduced forms. The individual capabilities of the low-valent metal fragments to undergo oxidation and to shift the reduction potential of the bpym π acceptor ligand on coordination combine to result in variable electrochemical potential differences. After consideration of different Franck-Condon factors, absorption intensities, additional low-lying unoccupied orbitals of the bridging acceptor ligand and solvatochromic effects, we have assigned the considerably varying metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions in the visible.     

The Influence of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHC) on the Reactivity of [Ru(NHC)4H]+ With H2, N2, CO and O2

The five‐coordinate ruthenium N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) hydrido complexes [Ru(IiPr₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 1 ; IiPr₂Me₂=1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene; Ar^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃), [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; IEt₂Me₂=1,3‐diethyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 3 ; IMe₄=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) have been synthesised following reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₃HCl] with 4–8 equivalents of the free carbenes at ambient temperature. Complexes 1 – 3 have been structurally characterised and show square pyramidal geometries with apical hydride ligands. In both dichloromethane or pyridine solution, 1 and 2 display very low frequency hydride signals at about δ ?41. The tetramethyl carbene complex 3 exhibits a similar chemical shift in toluene, but shows a higher frequency signal in acetonitrile arising from the solvent adduct [Ru(IMe₄)₄(MeCN)H][BAr^F₄], 4 . The reactivity of 1 – 3 towards H₂ and N₂ depends on the size of the N‐substituent of the NHC ligand. Thus, 1 is unreactive towards both gases, 2 reacts with both H₂ and N₂ only at low temperature and incompletely, while 3 affords [Ru(IMe₄)₄(η²‐H₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄(N₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 8 ) in quantitative yield at room temperature. CO shows no selectivity, reacting with 1 – 3 to give [Ru(NHC)₄(CO)H][BAr^F₄] ( 9 – 11 ). Addition of O₂ to solutions of 2 and 3 leads to rapid oxidation, from which the Ru^III species [Ru(NHC)₄(OH)₂][BAr^F₄] and the Ru^IV oxo chlorido complex [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄(O)Cl][BAr^F₄] were isolated. DFT calculations reproduce the greater ability of 3 to bind small molecules and show relative binding strengths that follow the trend CO ? O₂ > N₂ > H₂.     

Formation of Isomeric Tetrathiotungstate Clusters [{Cp*Ru(CO)}2(WS4){W(CO)4}] by the Reaction of [Cp*2Ru2S4] with [W(CO)3(MeCN)3]

Thermal and photochemical interconversion occurs between the isomeric pair of tetrathiotungstate [WS₄]²⁻ clusters 1 and 2 , which were formed by thermolysis of [Cp^*₂Ru₂S₄] and [W(CO)₃(MeCN)₃] [Eq. (1)] and then structurally characterized. During synthesis, a dramatic redistribution of ligands between the Ru and W atoms takes place without the loss of any CO and S ligands.     

Theoretical studies on Ru(fppz)2(CO)L (L = N-heterocyclic ligand): Electronic structure, absorption, phosphorescence, and solvatochromism

A series of ruthenium(II) complexes Ru(fppz)₂(CO)L [fppz = 3-trifluoromethyl-5(2-pyridyl)pyrazole; L = pyridine (1), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (2), 4-cyanopyridine (3)] were designed and investigated theoretically to explore their electronic structures, absorption, and emissions as well as the solvatochromism. The singlet ground state and triplet excited state geometries were fully optimized at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ and CIS/LANL2DZ level, respectively. The HOMO of 1–3 is composed of d_yz(Ru) atom and π(fppz). The LUMO of 1 and 2 is dominantly contributed by π*(fppz) orbital, but that of 3 is contribute by π*(L). Absorption and phosphorescence in vacuo, C₆H₁₂, and CH₃CN media were calculated using the TD-DFT level of theory with the PCM model based on the optimized ground and excited state geometries, respectively. The lowest-lying absorption of 1 and 2 at 387 and 391 nm is attributed to {[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] → [π*(fppz)]} transition, but that of 3 at 479 nm is assigned to {[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] → [π*(L)]} transition. The phosphorescence of 1 and 2 at 436 and 438 nm originates from ³{[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] [π*(fppz)]} excited state, while that of 3 at 606 nm is from ³{[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] [π*(L)]} excited state. The calculation results showed that the absorption and emission transition character can be changed from MLCT/ILCT to MLCT/LLCT transition by altering the substituent on the L ligand. The phosphorescence of 1 and 2 does not have solvatochromism, but that of 3 at 606 nm (vacuo), 584 nm (C₆H₁₂), and 541 nm (CH₃CN) is strongly dependent on the solvent polarity, so introducing electron-withdrawing group on ligand L will induce remarkable solvatochromism.     

Ruthenium(II)-Phthalocyaninate(2–): Darstellung und Eigenschaften von Acido(carbonyl)phthalocyaninato(2–)ruthenat(II), [Ru(X)(CO)Pc2−]− (X = Cl,Br, I,NCO, NCS,N3)

Ruthenium(II) Phthalocyaninates(2–): Synthesis and Properties of (Acido)(carbonyl)phthalocyaninato(2–)ruthenate(II), [Ru(X)(CO)Pc^2?]^? (X = Cl, Br, I, NCO, NCS, N₃) (ⁿBu₄N)[Ru(OH)₂Pc^2?] is reduced in acetone with carbonmonoxid to blue-violet [Ru(H₂O)(CO)Pc^2?], which yields in tetrahydrofurane with excess (ⁿBu₄N)X acido(carbonyl)phthalocyaninato(2–)ruthenate(II), [Ru(X)(CO)Pc^2?]^? (X = Cl, Br, I, NCO, NCS, N₃) isolated as red-violet, diamagnetic (ⁿBu₄N) complex salt. The UV-Vis spectra are dominated by the typical π-π* transitions of the Pc^2? ligand at approximately 15100 (B), 28300 (Q₁) und 33500 cm^?1 (Q₂), only fairly dependent of the axial ligands. v(C? O) is observed at 1927 (X = I), 1930 (Cl, Br), 1936 (N₃, NCO) 1948 cm^?1 (NCS), v(C? N) at 2208 cm^?1 (NCO), 2093 cm^?1 (NCS) and v(N? N) at 2030 cm^?1 only in the MIR spectrum. v(Ru? C) coincides in the FIR spectrum with a deformation vibration of the Pc ligand, but is detected in the resonance Raman(RR) spectrum at 516 (X = Cl), 512 (Br), 510 (N₃), 504 (I), 499 (NCO), 498 cm^?1 (NCS). v(Ru? X) is observed in the FIR spectrum at 257 (X = Cl), 191 (Br), 166 (I), 349 (N₃), 336 (NCO) and 224 cm^?1 (NCS). Only v(Ru? I) is RR-enhanced.     

Dihapto-acyl derivatives of ruthenium(II). Preparation and structure of Ru[η2-C(O)CH3] I(CO)(PPh3)2 and Ru[η2-C(O)p-tolyl]I(C0) (PPh3) 2

Reaction between Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₃ and MeHgI yields Ru[η²-C(O)CH₃]I(CO)(PPh₃)₂ which in solution exists mainly as RuCH₃I(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ and crystal structure determination of Ru[η²-C(O)CH₃]I(CO)(PPh₃)₂ and previously described Ru[η²-C(O)p-tolyl]I(CO) (PPh₃)₂ confirms that in the solid state both molecules contain dihapto-acyl ligands.     

Synthesis of cis-[Ru(CO)2(S2X)2] [X = CNMe2, COEt, PPh2, P(OEt)2] and Molecular Structure of [Ru(CO){η2-S2P(OEt)2}{μ,η1,η2-S2P(OEt)2}]2

Two routes to 1,1-dithiolate complexes cis-[Ru(CO)₂(S₂X)₂] [X = NMe₂, OEt, PPh₂, P(OEt)₂] are presented. From the reaction of NH₄S₂P(OEt)₂ with the ruthenium(II) complex generated upon reduction of RuCl₃.3H₂O by CO in 2-methoxyethanol, along with the expected mononuclear product, cis-[Ru(CO)₂{η²-S₂P(OEt)₂}₂], binuclear [Ru(CO){η²-S₂P(OEt)₂} {μ,η¹,η²-S₂P(OEt)₂}]₂ was also produced. The latter has been crystallographically characterized and shows a trans-arrangement of carbonyls and cis-arrangement of terminal and bridging dithiolate ligands.     

Reactions of RSe− (R = Me,Ph) Groups in [RSeFe(CO)4I and [RSeCr(CO)5−]

The anionic [MeSeFe(CO)₄] and [MeSeCr(CO)₅] complexes were synthesized by reaction of [PPN][HFe(CO)₄] and [PPN][HCr(CO)₅] with MeSeSeMe respectively via nucleophilic cleavage of the Se-Se bond. The ease of cleavage of the Se-Se bond follows the nucleophilic strength of metal-hydride complexes. Methylation of [RSeCr(CO)₅^?] by the soft alkylating agent MeI resulted in the formation of neutral (MeSeMe)Cr(CO)₅ in THF at 0°C. In contrast, the [ICr(CO)₅^?] was isolated at ambient temperature. Reaction of [MeSeFe(CO)₄^?] or [MeSeCr(CO)₅^?] with HBF₄ yielded (CO)₃Fc(μ-SeMe)₂Fe(CO)₃ dimer and anionic [(CO )₅Cr (μ-SeMe)Cr(CO)₅^?] respectively, and no neutral (HSeMe)Fe(CO)₄ and (HSeMe)Cr(CO)₅ were detected spectrally (IR) even at low temperature. Reaction of NOBF₄ or [Ph₃C][BF₄] and [MeSeCr(CO)₅^?] resulted in the neutral monodentate (MeSeSeMe)Cr(CO)₅ complex. Addition of 1 equiv CpFe(CO)₂I to 2 equiv [MeSeCr(CO)₅^?] gave CpFe(CO)₂(SeMe) and the anionic [(CO)₅Cr(μ-SeMe)Cr(CO)₅^?] in THF at ambient temperature.     

Preparation of Ru(CO)3(PMe3)MeI and its acetyl derivatives

[Ru(CO)₄PMe₃] reacts with MeI to give fac-[Ru(CO)₃(PMe₃)(Me)I]. The latter reacts with PMe₃ to give a mixture of the three isomers of cis-bis(trimethylphosphine)-cis-dicarbonyl acetyl iodide [Ru(CO)₂(PMe₃)₂(COMe)I]. Decarbonylation of the mixture gives only the trans-bis(trimethylphosphine)-cis-dicarbonyl methyl iodide complex [Ru(CO)₂(PMe₃)₂MeI], which was also prepared by oxidative addition of MeI to [Ru(CO)₃(PMe₃)₂].     

1,3-diaryltriazenido complexes of ruthenium(I), (II) and (III), and of osmium(III), rhodium(III) and iridium(III)

The synthesis and characterization of the platinum metal—1,3-diaryltriazenido complexes [Ru(ArNNNAr)(CO)₃]₂, [Ru(ArNNNAr)₂]₂, cis-Ru(ArNNNAr)₂(CO)₂, MX₂(ArNNNAr)(PPh₃)₂ (M = Ru, Os; X = Cl, Br) and M′(ArNNNAr)₃ (M′= Ru, Os, Rh and Ir) are reported. Axial ligand substitution in [Ru(ArNNNAr)(CO)₃]₂ and adduct formation by [Ru(ArNNNAr)₂]₂ are described. In contrast to other known Ru(II)/Ru(II) “lantern” molecules, the species [Ru(ArNNNAr)₂]₂ have measured magnetic moments equivalent to ca one unpaired electron per dimer, which are presumably due to population of the spin states σ²π⁴δ²π^*4 and σ²π⁴δ²π^*3σ^*1.     

Use of the Cationic Fragments [Ru(η5-C5H5) (MeCN)3]+ and [M(η6-C6H5R)(MeCN)3]+ (M=Os, Ru; R=H, Me) as Ionic Coupling Reagents in the Synthesis of the Clusters [Os4M2(CO)12(η6-C6H5R)], [Os4M(CO)12(η6-C6H6)(Au2dppm)] and [Os5Ru(CO)15(η5-C5H5)(AuPPh3)]*

The clusters [H₂Os₄M(CO)₁₂eta⁶-C₆H₆)] (M=Os, Ru) may be deprotonated to generate anions [Os₄M(CO)₁₂eta⁶-C₆H₆)]^2- which react with [M′eta⁶-C₆H₅R) (MeCN)₃]²⁺(M^′=Os, Ru; R=H, Me) to give the bicapped tetrahedral clusters [Os₄(CO)₁₂MM′eta⁶-C₆H₅R)₂]. Whereas [Os₄(CO)₁₂M₂eta⁶-C₆H₆)₂] (M=Os, Ru) have one Meta⁶-C₆H₆) unit in a site connected to three other metals, {3}, and one in a site connected to four other metals, {4}, [Os₄(CO)₁₂OsRueta⁶-C₆H₆)₂] has the Rueta⁶-C₆H₆) unit in the {3} site irrespective of whether the Os or Ru anion is capped. Coupling of these anions with Au₂dppm yields [Os₄M(CO)₁₂eta⁶-C₆H₆)(Au₂dppm)] (M=Os, Ru), which have the arene ligand in the axial site of a trigonal bipyramid and the digold unit capping two faces. Reduction of [H₂Os₅(CO)₁₅] with K/Ph₂CO and coupling with [Rueta⁵-C₅H₅)(MeCN)₃]²⁺yields the monoanion [Os₅(CO)₁₅Rueta⁵-C₅H₅)]^? which reacts with [AuPPh₃]⁺ generating [Os₅(CO)₁₅Rueta⁵-C₅H₅)(AuPPh₃)] with the “Ru(C₅H₅)” unit in the terminal {3} site.     

Neue Phosphor-verbrückte Übergangsmetallcarbonyl-Komplexe Die Kristallstrukturen von [Re2(CO)7(PtBu)3], [Co4(CO)10(PtBu)2], [Ir4(CO)6(PtBu)6] und [Ni4(CO)10(PiPr)6]

New Phosphorus-bridged Transition Metal Carbonyl Complexes. The Crystal Structures of [Re₂(CO)₇(P^tBu)₃], [Co₄(CO)₁₀(P^tBu)₂], [Ir₄(CO)₆(P^tBu)₆], and [Ni₄(CO)₁₀(PⁱPr)₆], (P^tBu)₃ reacts with [Mn₂(CO)₁₀], [Re₂(CO)₁₀], [Co₂(CO)₈] and [Ir₄(CO)₁₂] to form the multinuclear complexes [M₂(CO)₇(P^tBu)₃] (M = Re ( 1 ), Mn ( 5 )), [Co₄(CO)₁₀(P^tBu)₂] ( 2 ) and [Ir₄(CO)₆(P^tBu)₆] ( 3 ). The reaction of (PⁱPr)₃ with [Ni(CO)₄] leads to the tetranuclear cluster [Ni₄(CO)₁₀(PⁱPr)₆] ( 4 ). The complex structures were obtained by X-ray single crystal structure analysis: ( 1 : space group P1 (Nr. 2), Z = 2, a = 917.8(3) pm, b = 926.4(3) pm, c = 1 705.6(7) pm, α = 79.75(3)°, β = 85.21(3)°, γ = 66.33(2)°; 2 : space group C2/c (Nr. 15), Z = 4, a = 1 347.7(6) pm, b = 1 032.0(3) pm, c = 1 935.6(8) pm, β = 105.67(2)°; 3 : space group P1 (Nr. 2), Z = 4, a = 1 096.7(4)pm, b = 1 889.8(10)pm, c = 2 485.1(12) pm, α = 75.79(3)°, β = 84.29(3)°, γ = 74.96(3)°; 4 : space group P2₁/c (Nr. 14), Z = 4, a = 2 002.8(5) pm, b = 1 137.2(8) pm, c = 1 872.5(5) pm, β = 95.52(2)°).     

Improved syntheses of Ru(CO)2 (O3SCF3)2 (bidentate) complexes and their conversion into new [Ru(CO)2 (bidentate)2]2+ complexes

Reaction of the complexes Ru(CO)₂Cl₂L [L = 2,2′-bipyridyl (bpy) or 1,10-phenanthroline (phen)] with trifluoromethanesulphonic acid under carefully controlled conditions yields Ru[cis-(CO)₂] [cis-(O₃SCF₃)₂] (bidentate complexes. From reactions of the trifluoromethanesulphonates with the appropriate bidentate ligands, the new complexes [cis-Ru(CO)₂-L(L′)]²⁺ (L as above; L′ = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl or 4,4′-diisopropyl-2,2′-bipyridyl) as well as the known [_cis-Ru(CO)₂L₂]²⁺ and [cis-Ru(CO)₂bpy(phen)]²⁺ have been prepared.     

Acetylene Dithiolate Linking up the [Tp′W(CO)(CN)] Moiety with RuII or PdII

A series of heterodinuclear complexes with acetylene dithiolate (acdt^2?) as the bridging moiety were synthesised by a facile one‐pot procedure that avoided use of the highly elusive acetylene dithiol. Generation of the W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] (Tp’=hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) and the W–Pd complexes [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] and [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)][PF₆] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphoshino)ethane), which exhibit a [W(η²‐κ²‐C₂S₂)M] core (M=Ru, Pd), was accomplished by using a transition‐metal‐assisted solvolytical removal of the Me₃Si‐ethyl thiol protecting groups. All intermediate species of the reaction have been fully characterised. The highly coloured W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] shows reversible redox chemistry, as does the prototype complex [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)][PF₆]. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction and IR, EPR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies in conjunction with DFT calculations prove the high electronic delocalisation of states over the acdt^2? linker. Comparative studies revealed a higher donor strength and more pronounced dithiolate character of acdt^2? in [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] relative to [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)]⁺. In addition, the influence of the overall complex charge on the metric parameters was investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies with the W–Pd complexes [Tp′WL₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] (L=(CN^?)(CO) or (CO)₂). The central [W(C₂S₂)Pd] units exhibit high structural similarity, which indicates the extensive delocalisation of charge over both metals.